A Collision on the Boston and Providence Rail Road at Roxbury, Massachusetts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Collision on the Boston and Providence Rail Road at Roxbury, Massachusetts A collision on the Boston and Providence Rail Road at Roxbury, Massachusetts Harry Chase, March 2012 Abstract On Wednesday, 29 June 1836, at 12:40 p.m., an 11-car northbound through passenger train on the single-track Boston and Providence Rail Road collided head-on with a 3-car southbound local passenger train, at Roxbury, Massachusetts, 1.5 miles south of Pleasant Street depot, Boston. The collision, caused by failure of the conductor and engineer of the northward train to observe safety precautions, resulted in one employee fatality, numerous injuries to passengers, and major damage to locomotives and cars. A suit brought in Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court against the railroad corporation by some of the more seriously injured passengers resulted in the plaintiffs receiving generous monetary awards. The Boston and Providence Rail Road Company then took steps to prevent the recurrence of such an accident. Background The Boston and Providence Rail Road connecting the capital cities of Massachusetts and Rhode Island was chartered 22 June 1831 and opened for service over its 42-mile main line 28 July 1835. It was built as a single-track railroad, but the roadbed was made wide enough to permit addition of a second track. A number of sidings with turnouts at either end allowed trains to meet or pass one another.[1] Most pioneer railroads in the Atlantic coastal region of the United States ran from a seaport into the interior. The Boston and Providence was an exception. It was planned primarily to connect one important seaport – Boston -- to another – New York – by means of coordinated train-boat service having a connection at Providence. The Boston and Providence, which was the only railroad entering the Rhode Island capital, enjoyed a monopoly on rail travel and shipping to and from that city. It also dominated the passenger business between Boston and New York. At Providence its trains met the Long Island Sound steamboats President and Benjamin Franklin of the New York and Boston Transportation Company, and Lexington and Cleopatra of “Commodore” Cornelius Vanderbilt's rival firm also based in New York City.[2] Interlocking directorates of the railroad and steamboat companies solidified the arrangements between them.[3] A contract between the Boston and Providence Rail Road Company and the New York and Boston Transportation Company contained the agreement that the steamboat trains connecting with the New York boats “shall at all times proceed to and from the steamboats at a rate more rapid, so as to effect the passage in less time than ordinary passenger trains of equal burden, and without stopping more than three times on the route.”[4] The northbound boat trains averaged 20 or 21 miles per hour on their runs between Providence and Boston.[5] Quick and reliable overnight rail-water service from Boston to New York commenced as soon as the railway opened. It was possible for Manhattan-bound travelers to eat a leisurely noon dinner at a fine hotel in Boston, be in Providence after a two-hour train trip in time to board a luxurious steamboat at four in the afternoon, and arrive in New York before businesses opened the next morning. The best locomotives and cars and the most competent and reliable engine and train crews were drawn for the steamboat trains. In the beginning, the only stop for the boat trains was Mansfield, the junction of the Taunton Branch Rail Road, 18.2 miles from India Point station in Providence, 23.8 miles from Pleasant Street depot, Boston. At Mansfield the engine took on wood and water, while passengers who wished to do so transferred to and from Taunton Branch trains. The departure time of the northbound steamboat train from Providence depended on the arrival of the boat from New York, which in bad weather might be delayed from one to 12 hours. This created a dangerous uncertainty on the railroad, because southward trains leaving Boston at regularly scheduled times were operating on single track head-to-head with northward boat trains running at irregular and unpredictable intervals out of Providence. This practice caught up with Boston and Providence after it had been in operation a bit less than a year. Risky operating practices One of the hazards of single-track railroading is unplanned violent encounters between opposing trains. On the Boston and Providence, regularly scheduled opposing trains leaving the terminals at fixed times were expected to meet at the approximate midpoint of Foxborough, 21.5 miles from Boston, 20.5 miles from Providence, the train that reached there first taking siding to let the other through on the main track.[6] In those early days, when there were no wayside signals or other advanced forms of communication, if the opposing train failed to arrive at the meeting point in a certain number of minutes, the waiting train was authorized to leave the siding and proceed cautiously, slowing to a crawl at danger points and sending a brakeman with a blue flag[7] ahead on foot to peer around the next curve; while the tardy train, when its conductor saw by his watch that he had overrun his time at the meeting point, was required to stop and then back cautiously to the nearest siding in its rear, to the annoyance of its passengers. The Boston and Providence Rail Road up until 29 June 1836 had experienced several train accidents The line was open for only 11 days when a car in a moving train near Providence became detached from the engine, though apparently there were no injuries.[8] An unidentified locomotive nicknamed “Creeping Turtle,” hauling an outbound work train loaded with wood, stone and iron near Boston on 28 November 1834, suddenly lost its steam pressure and stopped when “one of its boiler bolts flew out.” Luckily, no one was injured in the explosion.[9] On 22 August 1835 a mishap near Providence caused by lack of a locomotive headlight was reported: An accident occurred on the Providence rail-road on Saturday evening, but fortunately no lives were lost, although the cars were detained two or three hours. The train which left Providence at sunset, came in contact with the cars on their way from the city [Boston] – one of the locomotives had a light, and the other had not. Some damage was done to the cars, which did not reach the city till nearly 12 o'clock.[10] Five days later, the locomotive Philadelphia, later to be involved in the 1836 Roxbury collision, hauling a southbound 2-car night train jumped the track on a curve near the Dedham Branch junction. Little or no damage resulted, but the train was delayed 90 minutes.[11] Either a spark from the engine or flammable material in the car ignited the baggage car of a 9-car southbound steamboat train carrying 150 to 200 passengers within 7 miles of Providence on 13 April 1836. No passengers were injured, though the newspaper mail for New York and half the baggage were destroyed.[12] One week before the 29 June 1836 Roxbury collision, two freight trains ran into one another near Roxbury, one engine being overturned, with a cylinder ripped loose, producing a great cloud of escaping steam.[13] Approach to collision The “Steamboat Train” leaving Providence on Wednesday morning, 29 June 1836, consisted of the locomotive Philadelphia and 11 passenger coaches. The engine was a typical one of that era. Built by American Steam Carriage Company in Philadelphia, it had been in service for about a year. Before coming to the Boston and Providence it was tried out by the Boston and Worcester Rail Road, which found it unsatisfactory.[14] A 30-horsepower 4-2-0 type with two driving wheels, it hardly seemed powerful enough to pull the 11-car load assigned to it. But cars in those days were small, and between Providence and Boston there were no heavy northward grades (steepest was about 0.5 percent for a short distance just north of Mansfield and again at Toll Gate, 4.4 miles from Boston),[15] so on the Boston and Providence Rail Road, apparently, Philadelphia had proved itself as “the little engine that could.” It was said to be “equal in speed to the best foreign [engine],”[16] which may have been why it was picked to handle the “Steamboat Train.” Most of the 300 passengers who boarded the train at Providence had left New York the previous evening under a full moon aboard the six-year-old, twin-engine, side-wheel steamboat Benjamin Franklin of the New York and Boston Transportation Company. The Franklin, commanded by Captain Robert B. Coleman, was considered the “crack boat” on Long Island Sound. The connecting “Steamboat Train” being the Amtrak “Acela Express” of its day, the passengers expected a safe, fast ride to Boston. Among them were 120 seamen and marines from the Brooklyn Navy Yard, bound for Charlestown Navy Yard near Boston, where they were to be assigned to the U. S. sloop-of-war Boston, which had already “hauled off into the stream” and was about to sail.[17] In charge of the United States Navy detachment was Passed Midshipman John A. Russ.[18] He and his men boarded the boat train’s first two cars, which apparently had been reserved for them. The train pulled out of Providence’s India Point station at about 10 a.m., crossed the movable bridge over Seekonk River, then headed north on the longest straight track in New England – a 16.1-mile bee line to the first curve, 1.2 mile north of Mansfield depot. After the customary wood and water stop at Mansfield the “Steamboat Train” proceeded without a problem until it neared the station called Toll Gate, 37.6 miles from Providence, 0.4 mile south of Forest Hills and 4.4 miles from the Boston terminal.
Recommended publications
  • The DISPATCHER
    the DISPATCHER THE OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE CENTRAL OKLAHOMA RAILFAN CLUB LTD VOLUME XXV JULY 1993 NUMBER 7 THE NEXT CORC CLUB MEETING TO RI & KATY former agent Jimmy Bounds, and BE HELD JULY 10 Yukon Museum Director Jack Austerman. By Howard Thornton Members are welcome to suggest program ideas as well as assist with refreshments. Just call Ron Clarkson, Union Pacific Manager of Train HOWARD at 732-0566. • Operations for the Oklahoma City area will be the speaker for the Saturday, July 10, Central OK. HOUSE BILL 1078 PASSES BOTH Oklahoma Railfan Club meeting at the HOUSES! OMNIPLEX at 7 pm. He will show a Video Reprinted from Oklahoma Passenger Rail sent by Alex Tice, Union Pacific Director of By Roger Carter, President, OPRA Public Relations outlining the history of the railroad as well as its current operations, and (Friday, June 4, 1993; Chickasha, Oklahoma) then be ready to answer any questions members Yes! You've read the headline correctly! Barring might have. The usual refreshments and draw any negative action by Governor Walters it ap­ prizes will be program features. • pears that H.B. ft 1078 will become state law. This is a significant milestone for the Oklahoma EXCELLENT CORA PROGRAMS Passenger Rail Association as it is the first real PLANNED FOR NEXT SIX MONTHS victory for us in getting Amtrak back to Oklahoma for good. Top-notch programs featuring at least two major speakers monthly as well as refreshments and The battle is not over, however. Amtrak sup­ railroad draw prizes have been planned for the porters are contacting Amtrak and their elected next six months by CORA Program Director, representatives and Senators.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 3.3.2 List of Prioritized Route / Section
    The Preparatory Study on The Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit Development Project (Line 1) Final Report (Summary) Table 3.3.2 List of Prioritized Route / Section Route Section Length (km) Kamalapur – Bashundhara ( Main Line) MRT Line 1 28.2 Future Park - Purbachal Terminal (Purbachal Line) MRT Line 5 Hemayetpur- Vatara 22.4 MRT Line 6 Kamalapur – Uttara 20.4 BRT Line 3 Airport – Joydepur 20.4 Source:JICA Study Team Note: The length is based on RSTP. Source: JICA Study Team Figure 3.3.9 Prioritized Route / Section 2) LOS and Fare Setting of Mass Transit LOS and fare setting assumed in this demand forecast model is shown in Table 3.3.3. Table 3.3.3 List and Fare Setting of Mass Transit Mode 2025/2028 2035 Headway (min) 3.5 Capacity (000 pax/day/ direction) 200 MRT Speed (km/h) 35 Fare (Tk) 22.6+2.8 /km 30.6+3.8 /km Headway (min) 3.0 Capacity (000 pax/day/ direction) 64 BRT Speed (km/h) 23 Fare (Tk) 9.9+4.5/km 13.4+6.1 /km Headway (min) 60 Capacity (000 pax/day/ direction) 64 BR Speed (km/h) 15 Fare (Tk) 0.7 / km 1.0 / km Source: JICA Study Team 3-38 The Preparatory Study on The Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit Development Project (Line 1) Final Report (Summary) Daily Passenger Demand Result Table 3.3.4 shows the estimated railway performance indicators of MRT Line 1. PPHPD (Passenger Per Hour Per Direction) will be 26,500 pax in 20251, 48,000 in 2035 and 58,500 in 2055.
    [Show full text]
  • April 25, 2016 Volume 36 Number 4
    APRIL 25, 2016 ■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 36 ■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 4 E8 #224 with the Toronto-Chicago train at Windsor, Ontario. Since discontinued. Amtrak #649, the last SDP40F built—Amtrak’s first brand-new power. Shown in Florida. E8 #4316, a one-of-a-kind paint job. Quickly-painted ex-PC unit for Amtrak’s inaugural May 1, 1971. Shown at Detroit’s station. The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski “Amtrak News”……………………………. .. Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page and photographer…………………… Joe Dumas Guest Contributors ……………………………… Savery Moore, Ron Clough …………... Rick Sutton The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2015 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 36 ■■■■■ NUMBER 4 ■■■■■ APRIL 2016 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner.......……….3 Treasurer………………....Will Baker Contests .................….
    [Show full text]
  • September 25, 2017 Volume 37
    SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 37 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 9 CLUB IN TRANSITION-4 The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Bryan Miller Web Page …………………..…………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………….Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2017 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 37 ■■■■■ NUMBER 9 ■■■■■ SEPTEMBER 2017 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….3 Treasurer………………....Will Baker Contests ................ ………..3 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Clinic……………..….…….5 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Editor’s Notes. ….…....….12 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’19) Members .............. ….…....13 …………………………...Rick Sutton (‘19) Memories ............. .………..4 Potpourri .............. ..……….6 Running Extra ...... ………..13 ON THE COVER: (Clockwise from top left) Mechanical Committee room; Model Shop clinic; Woodshop; back of temp.
    [Show full text]
  • May 22, 2017 Volume 37
    MAY 22, 2017 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 37 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 5 A Club in Transition 3 The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page …………………..…………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………….Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2017 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 37 ■■■■■ NUMBER 5 ■■■■■ MAY 2017 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….4 Treasurer………………....Will Baker A Club in Transition….…..13 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Contests ................ ………..4 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Clinic……………..….…….7 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’17) Editor’s Notes. ….…....… .13 …………………………...Rick Sutton (‘17) Form 19 Orders .... ………..4 Members .............. ….…....14 Memories ............. .………..5 Potpourri .............. ..……….7 ON THE COVER: The first 25% of our building was Running Extra .....
    [Show full text]
  • Scenes from a Lost Hotel: the Cape Codder, 1930-1945 by Norah Schneider, Collections Manager
    Scenes from a Lost Hotel: The Cape Codder, 1930-1945 by Norah Schneider, Collections Manager Most people are familiar with the Cape Codder Hotel in West Falmouth. Opened as the Sippewissett Hotel in 1900 by John C. Haynes on the former site of Richard L. Swift’s sheep farm, over the years it was also called the Cleveland Hotel and the Mayflower Hotel. In 1930, owners Mr. and Mrs. Percival F. Brine renamed it the Cape Codder. When Captain John R. Peterson leased it in 1936—later buying it in 1940—he kept the name, and so it was known until the hotel was torn down to make room for condos in 1988. Well, if those walls could have talked . Fortunately for us, The Enterprise served as the social media of the day, so tales of the Cape Codder still remain today. Police activity at the Cape Codder in July 1936 resulted from two illegal slot machines—one nickel machine and one dime machine. Falmouth police seized the machines and hotel manager Charles Edward pleaded guilty to “possessing gaming implements.”1 The Cape Codder Hotel and its signs became the center of town and state debates in the summer of 1937. In July, Falmouth selectmen would not allow owner John R. Peterson to maintain three signs measuring eighteen square feet and directing traffic to the hotel. A few weeks later, the state Department of Public Works found three signs illegally on Route 28 in Falmouth—two advertising the Cape Codder and one advertising Charlotte Crest campground.2 The Boston Shamrocks, a team in the American Football League and 1936 champions, trained for their season opener at the Cape Codder in 1 “Slot Machines Seized,” Falmouth Enterprise, Thursday, July 16, 1936, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Sandwich Open Space and Recreation Plan
    Town of Sandwich Open Space and Recreation Plan Sandwich Planning and Development Department November, 2018 Open Space & Recreation Plan 2018 Table of Contents Section 1 – Plan Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 Section 2 – Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 Statement of Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Planning Process and Public Participation............................................................................................................. 7 Section 3 – Community Setting ................................................................................................................. 8 Regional Context...................................................................................................................................................... 8 History of the Community ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Population Characteristics .................................................................................................................................... 10 Past, Present and Future Population........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Water Main Specifications
    INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STANDARDS STANDARD WATER MAIN SPECIFICATIONS August 1, 2009 Environmental Protection THE CITY OF NEW YORK BUREAU OF WATER AND SEWER OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATIONS DDC Publications TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION I GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1.06 Definitions And General Provisions I-3 1.06.1 Definition Of Terms I-3 1.06.2 Sewers, Water Mains, Etc., To Be Built As Shown On The Contract Plans I-3 1.06.2a Means And Methods Of Construction I-4 1.06.3 Hours Of Work I-4 1.06.4 Adjusting Existing Pavements, Sidewalks, Etc. I-4 1.06.5 Tree Preservation, Protection, Removal And Replacement I-4 1.06.6 Encumbrances I-5 1.06.7 Disposal Of Excess Excavated Material I-6 1.06.8 Lines And Grades (Contractor’s Survey Party) I-6 1.06.9 Preservation Of Points, Stakes, Etc. I-6 1.06.10 Contractor Not To Disturb City Monuments I-7 1.06.11 Right To Construct Sewers, Water Mains, House Connections, Etc. I-7 1.06.12 Flow Of Sewers And Drains, Etc. Interrupted; Sewers To Be Kept Clean; I-7 Removing And Abandoning Sewers, Water Mains, Etc. 1.06.13 City Not Responsible For Accuracy Of Subsurface Records Or Information I-9 1.06.14 Notice To Utility Companies, Etc., To Remove Structures Occupying I-10 Place Of Sewers, Water Mains Or Appurtenances 1.06.15 Notice To Utility Companies, Etc., To Support, Protect, Temporarily I-10 Remove And Replace Structures Within Limits Of Ordered Excavation 1.06.16 Contractor To Make Or Entertain Offer To Protect, Support, Temporarily I-11 Remove And Replace, Pipes And Other Structures Of Private
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3.2 Existing Standard for Fire Fighting and Management of Metro the Characteristics of the Fire Accidents Are Indicated in the Preceding Section
    JICA PREPARATORY SURVEY ON GREATER CAIRO METRO LINE NO. 4 4.3.2 Existing Standard for Fire Fighting and Management of Metro The characteristics of the fire accidents are indicated in the preceding section. According to the type of tunnels, the standard/design guideline for fire accident management is regulated by some countries taking these characteristics into consideration. On the other hand, the countries which do not have tunnels and underground stations blindly use or apply other country’s standard/design guideline. As a result, the scale of the tunnel and station becomes more excessive than its requirement in some cases. In order to apply appropriate measure and method, the present conditions of standards/guidelines for metro construction/operation in the world are explained in this section and some points of these standards are studied in the following section. (1) NFPA 130 (USA) NFPA 130 which is the “Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems” is the standard of USA for the design of the metro. It is widely used in countries which do not have their own standard/regulation and it has strong influence in other countries. So far, this standard is applied for the metro in India, Singapore, etc. NFPA 130 is one of the strictest standards and it could not be often applied for the old metro which was constructed before NFPA 130, which was established in 1983. If this standard is applied strictly, the structure of the tunnel and station tends to be bigger and the cost of the construction also tends to be higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscape Report for Fort Hill, Cape Cod National Seashore
    CULTURAL f)-13 If LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR FORT HILL [Eape Cod National Seashore United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation 15 State Street • Boston, Massachusetts 02109 IN REPLY REFER TO: June 4, 1996 Memorandum To: DSC Technical Information Center Information and Product Services National Park Service PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 From: Director, Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation Subject: Transmittal of Cultural Landscape Report for Fort Hill, Cape Cod National Seashore We are pleased to send you a copy of the Cultural La,ndscape Report for Fort Hill. The report is the result of exacting historical research and field analysis. It documents the evolution of the landscape, evaluates • the historic context of the site, and analyzes the landscape's significance and integrity. It also includes recommendations for the treatment and management of the Fort Hill Historic District. The cultural landscape report was completed in part under a cooperative agreement between the National Park Service and the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. It is part of the Cultural Landscape Publication Series continuing at the Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation. If you would like additional copies of the report, of it you have any comments or questions, please contact me at the Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation (617) 223-5059. Nora Mitchell Enclosure • • CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR FORT HILL Cape Cod National Seashore by Lynn Kneedler-Schad, • Katharine Lacy, and Larry Lowenthal CULTURAL LANDSCAPE PUBLICATION #10 Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation National Park Service Boston, Massachusetts • 1995 • Cover Illustration: Stone Walls at Fort Hill, 1995, by Lynn Kneedler-Schad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    Public Document No. 12 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Report of the Attorney General for Fiscal Year 2004 July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004 PUBLICATION OF THIS DOCUMENT APPROVED BY ELLEN M. BICKELMAN, STATE PURCHASING AGENT. Publication Number CR1097-06/05-4.50−Docuprint Express THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE A SHBURTON PLACE THOMAS F. REILLY ATTORNEY GENERAL BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108-1698 In accordance with the provisions of Section 11 of Chapter 12 of the Massachusetts General Laws, I hereby submit the Annual Report for the Office of the Attorney General. This Annual Report covers the period from July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004. Respectfully submitted, Thomas F. Reilly Attorney General TABLE OF CONTENTS ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL APPOINTMENTS ................................. i EXECUTIVE BUREAU ......................................................................................... 1 General Counsel’s Office ................................................................................... 2 Human Resource Management Office ............................................................... 4 External Affairs Office ....................................................................................... 6 Information Technology Division ...................................................................... 7 Budget Office ................................................................................................... 8 Operations Division .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Delaware & Hudson Was a Classy Railroad!
    SUMMER 2016 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 36 ■■■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBERS 6 & 7 The Delaware & Hudson was a Classy Railroad! The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page and photographer…………………… Joe Dumas Guest Contributors ……………………………… The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2015 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 36 ■■■■■ NUMBERS 6 & 7 ■■■■■ JUNE-JULY 2016 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….3 Treasurer………………....Will Baker Contests ................ ………..3 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Clinic……………..……….6 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Editor’s Notes. ….……….11 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’17) Election Results ... ………..3 …………………………...Rick Sutton (Temp) Members .............. ……....11 Memories ............. ………..4 The Operator ........ ……….14 Potpourri .............. .……….6 On the cover: 1993 was the D&H’s Sesquicentennial Running Extra .....
    [Show full text]