DOCSLIB.ORG

Tfl Purchase Orders Over £5000 PDF 804KB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Transport for London Purchase Order List Over £5000 Period 1 - 13 FY2020/2021 Value Added Tax Local Authority that can't SME Reference Department Supplier Sum to be be Yes/ Number Responsible Description of the Good/Services Code Supplier Paid recovered Start Date No 3101139571 Transport for London BSP Electricity 2020 - 2021 13002978 EDF Energy 33,586,475.31 N/A 27/04/2020 NO 3101138343 Transport for London REQ000000056167-Variation No. 009-9 10000189 Capita Business Services Ltd 18,919,573.00 N/A 15/04/2020 NO 3101139848 Transport for London BTP B Division budget 2020_21 10021911 British Transport Police 17,375,000.00 N/A 29/04/2020 NO 3101139624 Transport for London Alstom Norther Line 10002476 ALSTOM NL SERV PROV 11,777,152.00 N/A 27/04/2020 NO 3101139580 Transport for London Stations and Ops Quarter 1 PO -ABM Clean 10020318 ABM Facility Services UK Ltd 8,012,289.69 N/A 27/04/2020 NO 3101138485 Transport for London REQ000000056079-Variation No. 009-10 10000189 Capita Business Services Ltd 6,541,953.00 N/A 16/04/2020 NO 3101139624 Transport for London Alstom Northern Line Service Contract 10002476 ALSTOM NL SERV PROV 6,277,348.00 N/A 27/04/2020 NO 3101140004 Transport for London AO Fleet & Depot cleaning services -QTR1 10020318 ABM Facility Services UK Ltd 5,782,638.60 N/A 30/04/2020 NO 3101140167 Transport for London ITT Contract, Budget Period 2 Quarter1 13002267 BALFOUR BEATTY RAIL LIMITED 4,836,926.00 N/A 01/05/2020NO 3101139478 Transport for London Asset Ops LoHAC Yr 8 Ord Maint - Central 13001356 Ringway Jacobs Limited 4,690,107.00 N/A 24/04/2020 NO 3101138794 Transport for London Telent TCMS2 ATS Reg Maint 20/21 13000145 Telent Technology Services Ltd 4,441,241.46 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101140072 Transport for London LoHAC Yr 8 Lump Sums - North East 13001356 Ringway Jacobs Limited 4,374,255.00 N/A 30/04/2020 NO 3101140240 Transport for London Asset Ops LoHAC Yr 8 Lump Sums - Central 13001356 Ringway Jacobs Limited 3,575,066.00 N/A 02/05/2020 NO 3101138279 Transport for London Siemens D&EI Instation Support & Maint 13000655 Siemens Traffic Solutions 3,348,613.25 N/A 14/04/2020 NO 3101138432 Transport for London 1FM Bundle 3.2 Premises TFL-00926 Qtr1 13002290 Lanes Group Plc 3,259,288.74 N/A 15/04/2020 NO 3101140071 Transport for London LoHAC Yr 8 Ord Maint - North East 13001356 Ringway Jacobs Limited 3,221,095.00 N/A 30/04/2020 NO 3101139178 Transport for London TFL01230_Comms Preventative/Reactive_LU 13000145 Telent Technology Services Ltd 3,148,480.14 N/A 22/04/2020 NO 3101138795 Transport for London Siemens TCMS2 ATS Reg Maint 20/21 13000655 Siemens Traffic Solutions 2,896,753.68 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101138980 Transport for London NSL Operational Direct Costs 2020-21 10006745 NSL Ltd 2,790,264.24 N/A 21/04/2020 NO 3101138967 Transport for London C740 Pan TfL Otis - PPM 13000044 OTIS LIMITED 2,751,377.10 N/A 21/04/2020 NO 3101138793 Transport for London Cubic TCMS2 ATS Reg Maint 20/21 10027449 CSTS Ltd 2,534,800.87 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101138277 Transport for London Siemens D&EI Outstation Support & Maint 13000655 Siemens Traffic Solutions 2,521,216.81 N/A 14/04/2020 NO 3101140239 Transport for London Bus Stations & Stands Cleaning 2020/21 10020318 ABM Facility Services UK Ltd 2,381,062.13 N/A 02/05/2020 NO 3101139410 Transport for London LU Mechanical Maintenance 2020-21 Q1 10024726 Engie Services Ltd 2,326,608.00 N/A 24/04/2020 NO 3101137196 Transport for London VCS - Fire Systems Build Order 13001356 Ringway Jacobs Limited 2,285,000.00 N/A 02/04/2020 NO 3101139180 Transport for London LU Fleet Security Core Services Q1 20-21 10027987 Interserve (Facilities Mgmt) Ltd 2,191,266.69 N/A 22/04/2020 NO 3101139586 Transport for London 1FM Lanes Additional works 13002290 Lanes Group Plc 2,189,596.03 N/A 27/04/2020 NO 3101138975 Transport for London PH Licensing Inspection - 2020-2021 10006745 NSL Ltd 1,917,128.84 N/A 21/04/2020 NO 3101138799 Transport for London RedSpeed Lot1 RegMa SafetyCam SpotSp2021 10010310 Redspeed International Ltd 1,895,080.98 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101138889 Transport for London CSTS TOMS Regular Maintenance 20/21 10027449 CSTS Ltd 1,890,959.59 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101139847 Transport for London Lot 1 Bridges and Structures 2020-21 13002448 Skanska Construction UK Ltd t/a IS 1,865,640.00 N/A 29/04/2020 NO 3101138769 Transport for London 3rd Party & Cams CCTV Comms 20/21 10013089 Interoute Networks Ltd 1,709,564.22 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101139456 Transport for London OneFMBundle-CoreContract-M&E - BI 20/21 13000907 VINCI Construction UK Limited 1,628,251.16 N/A 24/04/2020 NO 3101139149 Transport for London TfL-00925 LU Elec Add Works 2020-21 10024726 Engie Services Ltd 1,513,487.12 N/A 22/04/2020 NO 3101140029 Transport for London SR139261 Base Station Hotel 10000189 Capita Business Services Ltd 1,455,025.00 N/A 30/04/2020 NO 3101139411 Transport for London TfL00924_1FM Fire Maintenance Q1 2020-21 10024726 Engie Services Ltd 1,403,121.83 N/A 24/04/2020 NO 4500528227 Transport for London MASK, DISPOSABLE SURGICAL 3 PLY 10025219 Tower Supplies 1,400,000.00 N/A 20/04/2020 YES 3101138765 Transport for London Interoute Comms TS OVD VMS 20/21 10013089 Interoute Networks Ltd 1,399,170.24 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101139791 Transport for London Bus Shelter Cleaning 20/21 10018867 MITIE Cleaning & Environmental 1,373,292.05 N/A 28/04/2020 NO 3101139760 Transport for London LU Electrical Maintenance 2020-21 Q1 10024726 Engie Services Ltd 1,236,613.00 N/A 28/04/2020 NO 3101137320 Transport for London Conamar-Refurb-Victoria Arc-IP 13003304 CONAMAR BUILDING SERVICES LTD 1,209,265.00 N/A 02/04/2020 YES 3101140148 Transport for London VNT158 St James Park Diversion (VTP015) 13000215 THALES TRANSPORT & SECURITY LIMITED 1,069,664.00 N/A 01/05/2020 NO 3101137165 Transport for London CBRE valuations 10014124 CBRE LIMITED 1,050,000.00 N/A 01/04/2020 NO 3101138805 Transport for London Telent TCMS2 SlotCutting OrdMaint 20/21 13000145 Telent Technology Services Ltd 1,040,000.00 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101138320 Transport for London SMA10 CRMS Installation uplift i 13001335 KN Network Services Ltd 955,653.00 N/A 15/04/2020 NO 3101140169 Transport for London Asset Ops LoHAC Yr 8 Piers Maint Central 13001356 Ringway Jacobs Limited 953,544.87 N/A 01/05/2020 NO 3101140216 Transport for London VCS Office Cleaning 2020/21 10020318 ABM Facility Services UK Ltd 916,814.20 N/A 01/05/2020 NO 3101138527 Transport for London Redspeed Lot 2 RegMtce SafetyCams 2021 10010310 Redspeed International Ltd 912,201.94 N/A 16/04/2020 NO 4500528274 Transport for London MASK, DISPOSABLE SURGICAL 3 PLY TYPE II 10018077 HAYLEY GROUP LIMITED (EDI) 912,000.00 N/A 20/04/2020 NO 3101137993 Transport for London Telent RegMtce CCTV Str&CtrlCentEq20/21 13000145 Telent Technology Services Ltd 900,576.35 N/A 08/04/2020 NO 3101140080 Transport for London TransWBS BCV3084 - Track Realignment 13003032 Ductclean (UK) Ltd t/a DCUK FM 871,792.88 N/A 30/04/2020 YES 3101139179 Transport for London Kone JIC 1760 PPM 13000042 Kone Escalators Ltd 858,330.94 N/A 22/04/2020 NO 3101138110 Transport for London Siemens TCMS2 SlotCutting OrdMaint 20/21 13000655 Siemens Traffic Solutions 845,000.00 N/A 09/04/2020 NO Page 1 of 172 Transport for London Purchase Order List Over £5000 Period 1 - 13 FY2020/2021 3101140027 Transport for London 2019-20 - Vinci M&E - Annual AW Uplift 13000907 VINCI Construction UK Limited 797,350.78 N/A 30/04/2020 NO 3101140076 Transport for London TransWBS JNP0325 Trackwork Picc Circus 13000134 TRACKWORK LTD 763,899.65 N/A 30/04/2020 NO 4500528396 Transport for London VMI VMI Consumable Item Quarterly 10018077 HAYLEY GROUP LIMITED (EDI) 758,333.33 N/A 23/04/2020 NO 3101138320 Transport for London SMA11 CRMS Installation uplift i 13001335 KN Network Services Ltd 747,115.00 N/A 15/04/2020 NO 3101137447 Transport for London GIS Licence renewal 2020/21 10007129 Esri (UK) Limited 700,000.00 N/A 03/04/2020 NO 3101139483 Transport for London NSL Operational Direct Costs 2020-21 10006745 NSL Ltd 697,566.06 N/A 24/04/2020 NO 3101138110 Transport for London Siemens TCMS2 SwitchOut OrdMaint 20/21 13000655 Siemens Traffic Solutions 648,196.39 N/A 09/04/2020 NO 3101137357 Transport for London JIC1760 - KONE - CRW E3 - FY19/20 13000042 Kone Escalators Ltd 640,575.93 N/A 03/04/2020 NO 3101139176 Transport for London LOT 2: TFL 01127 PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC 10024745 Z-Tech Control Systems Limited 624,064.87 N/A 22/04/2020 YES 3101137621 Transport for London SMS Works on Tranche 2 Stations 13000145 Telent Technology Services Ltd 611,779.70 N/A 06/04/2020 NO 3101137356 Transport for London JIC1760 - KONE - LOB E8 - FY19/20 13000042 Kone Escalators Ltd 605,928.61 N/A 03/04/2020 NO 3101139622 Transport for London Car Free Day Management 12002231 The Creative Engagement Group Ltd 599,865.00 N/A 27/04/2020 YES 3101137903 Transport for London VCCP fees 2020/21 Apr-Jun 10027060 VCCP Group LLP 581,010.00 N/A 08/04/2020 NO 3101139667 Transport for London TfL94754 CashMgt Yr1Maint 2020 10016344 Suzohapp (UK) Ltd.
Recommended publications

  • The London Congestion Charge

    Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 20, Number 4—Fall 2006—Pages 157–176 The London Congestion Charge Jonathan Leape y the 1990s, the average speed of trips across London was below that at the beginning of the twentieth century—before the car was introduced (New- B bery, 1990, p. 35). Traffic speeds in central London had fallen more than 20 percent since the 1960s, from an average 12.7 mph for the morning peak period in 1968 (and a high of 14.2 mph in 1975) to 10 mph in 1998. Even in the larger area of inner London, drivers in 1998 spent almost 30 percent of their time stationary during peak periods and more than half their time traveling at speeds of less than 10 mph (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998). By 2002, the all-day average travel speed in central London was just 8.6 mph (14.3 km/hour), compared to an uncongested (night-time or “free flow”) average speed of around 20 mph (32 km/hour). Congestion, measured in terms of minutes of delay per mile compared to uncongested conditions, averaged 3.7 minutes/mile (2.3 min/km) (Transport for London, 2003a, p. 11). With more than one million people entering central London between 7:00 and 10:00 a.m. on an average workday, and more than one-quarter of those by road, the cost of congestion was clearly considerable. Public concern over levels of traffic congestion was high. An independent survey in 1999 identified public transport and congestion as the two most “impor- tant problems requiring action”—selected by 46 and 33 percent of London resi- dents, respectively, compared to 20 percent for crime or law and order.
  • Extended Impregnation Kraft Cooking of Softwood: Effects on Reject, Yield, Pulping Uniformity, and Physical Properties

    Extended Impregnation Kraft Cooking of Softwood: Effects on Reject, Yield, Pulping Uniformity, and Physical Properties

    Extended Impregnation Kraft Cooking of Softwood: Effects on reject, yield, pulping uniformity, and physical properties Katarina Karlström Licentiate thesis Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology Division of Wood Chemistry and Pulp Technology Stockholm 2009 TRITA-CHE-Report 2009:59 ISSN 1654-1081 ISBN 978-91-7415-496-2 Extended impregnation kraft cooking of softwood: Effects on reject, yield, pulping uniformity, and physical properties Katarina Karlström AKADEMISK AVHANDLING Som med tillstånd av Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan i Stockholm framlägges till offentlig granskning för avläggande av teknologie licentiatexamen fredagen den 18:e december 2009, kl. 10.00 i STFI-salen, Innventia AB, Drottning Kristinas väg 61, Stockholm. Avhandlingen försvaras på svenska. © Katarina Karlström Stockholm 2009 Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology Teknikringen 56-58 SE-100 44 Stockholm Sweden Abstract Converting wood into paper is a complex process involving many different stages, one of which is pulping. Pulping involves liberating the wood fibres from each other, which can be done either chemically or mechanically. This thesis focuses on the most common chemical pulping method, the kraft cooking process, and especially on a recently developed improvement of the impregnation phase, which is the first part of a kraft cook. Extended impregnation kraft cooking (EIC) technique is demonstrated to be an improvement of the kraft pulping process and provides a way to utilize softwood to a higher degree, at higher pulp yield. We demonstrate that it is possible to produce softwood ( Picea abies ) kraft pulp using a new cooking technique, resulting in a pulp that can be defibrated without inline refining at as high lignin content as 8% on wood, measured as kappa numbers above 90.

  • London Guide Welcome to London

    Visitor information Welcome to London Your guide to getting around central London on public transport and making the most of your visit. tfl.gov.uk/visitinglondon Tube and central London bus maps inside #LondonIsOpen Welcome to London Paying for your travel Public transport is the best way to get There are different ways to pay for your around London and discover all that the travel. For most people, pay as you go - city has to offer. This guide will help you paying for the trips you make - with a plan how to get around the Capital on contactless payment card, an Oyster card or public transport. a Visitor Oyster card, is the best option as it If you have just arrived at an airport and are offers value, flexibility and convenience. looking for ways to get to central London, go to page 11 in this guide. Getting around London London’s transport system is iconic. With its world famous Underground (Tube) and iconic red buses, travelling around the Capital is an experience in itself. But London is much more than just the Tube or the bus; our vast network of transport services includes: Contactless payment cards If your credit, debit, charge card or wearable device has the contactless symbol above you can use it for pay as you go travel on London’s public transport. Android Pay and Apple Pay are also accepted. Benefits of contactless • It’s quick and easy – there’s no need to queue to buy a ticket • It offers great value – pay as you go with contactless is better value than buying a single ticket and you can benefit from both Night Tube daily and weekly capping (see page 5) • 14 million people have used contactless Night Tube services run on the to travel in London – including customers Jubilee, Victoria and most of from over 90 countries the Central and Northern lines all night on Fridays and Saturdays.
  • Traffic Accidents and the London Congestion Charge

    Traffic Accidents and the London Congestion Charge

    Economics Working Paper Series 2014/015 Traffic Accidents and the London Congestion Charge Colin P. Green, John. S. Heywood and Maria Navarro The Department of Economics Lancaster University Management School Lancaster LA1 4YX UK © Authors All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission, provided that full acknowledgement is given. LUMS home page: http://www.lums.lancs.ac.uk/ Traffic Accidents and the London Congestion Charge Colin P. Green1, John. S. Heywood2,1 and Maria Navarro1 1Lancaster University 2 University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Abstract In a rare effort to internalize congestion costs, London recently instituted charges for traveling by car to the central city during peak hours. Although the theoretical influence on the number and severity of traffic accidents is ambiguous, we show that the policy generated a substantial reduction in both accidents and fatalities in the charged area and hours. At the same time, the spatial, temporal and vehicle specific nature of the charge may cause unintended substitutions as traffic and accidents shift to other proximate areas, times and to uncharged vehicles. We demonstrate that, to the contrary, the congestion charge reduced accidents and fatalities in adjacent areas, times and for uncharged vehicles. These results are consistent with the government's objective to use the congestion charge to more broadly promote public transport and change driving habits. JEL Codes: I18, R48, H27 Keywords: Traffic Congestion; Pricing; Vehicle Accidents The authors thank the Melvin Lurie Memorial Fund at UWM which allowed Heywood and Navarro to work together in the fall of 2013.
  • Niche Innovation Dynamics and the Urban Mobility Transition the Case of Dockless Bike-Sharing in London

    Niche Innovation Dynamics and the Urban Mobility Transition the Case of Dockless Bike-Sharing in London

    Niche innovation dynamics and the urban mobility transition The case of dockless bike-sharing in London Russell Cannon Urban Studies Master’s Programme (Two-Year) 30 Credits VT2019 Supervisor: Désirée Nilsson 1 Abstract This thesis seeks to provide a detailed understanding of the introduction of dockless bike-sharing to London. As part of a wave of new smart and shared mobility services that are aiming to transform the way people move around cities, this emerging form of transport has created disruptions in London since its launch in 2017. This study aims analyse to what extent dockless bike-sharing aligns or conflicts with the aims and objectives of local authorities governing public space in London. In doing so, it also aims to reveal insights into transformations in contemporary mobility by exploring the dynamics of niche innovations within socio-technical transitions, thus contributing to knowledge in the field of transition studies. To do this, a qualitative case study methodology was employed using document analysis and interviews with four stakeholders integrally involved in the case study, representing both public authorities and a private sector dockless bike-sharing operator, Mobike. The findings demonstrate that dockless bike-sharing is well aligned with the city’s explicit objectives to reduce car dependency and encourage active travel. It has particular potential to make cycling more accessible by bringing bike-sharing to parts of the city that do not have access to the pre-existing, docked bike-sharing scheme, operated by the central transport authority, Transport for London. Despite this, dockless bike-sharing, as a niche innovation, has struggled to break into the existing urban mobility regime.
  • Black Liquor Gasification

    Black Liquor Gasification

    Black Liquor Gasification Summary and Conclusions from the IEA Bioenergy ExCo54 Workshop This publication provides Wood and Wastes the record of a workshop organised by IEA Bioenergy. CO2 Pool Black liquor gasification is an interesting option for production of synthesis gas that can subsequently be converted to a variety of motor fuels. The technology can be integrated into modern, Carbon ecocyclic, kraft pulp mill Dioxide Pulp and Paper biorefineries. USA and Sweden lead developments in this field. It is of interest primarily among countries with strong pulp and paper industries and national policies which promote substitution of petrol and diesel by biofuels. IEA Bioenergy IEA BIOENERGY: ExCo:2007:03 INTRODUCTION a large pulp and paper industry. It is thus of great interest to convert the primary energy in the black liquor to an This publication provides a summary and the conclusions energy carrier of high value. from a workshop organised by IEA Bioenergy. It was held in conjunction with the 54th meeting of the Executive Worldwide, the pulp and paper industry currently processes Committee in Ottawa on 6 October 2004. The purpose of the about 170 million tonnes of black liquor (measured as dry workshop was to present the developments of black liquor solids) per year, with a total energy content of about 2EJ, gasification for the production of energy and/or biofuels making black liquor a very significant biomass source (see for transport and discuss the remaining barriers, either Figure 1). In comparison with other potential biomass technical or strategic, that need to be overcome in order sources for chemicals production, black liquor has the to accelerate the successful demonstration of black liquor great advantage that it is already partially processed and gasification technologies and subsequently their penetration exists in a pumpable, liquid form.
  • Eccleston Place, London, England

    Eccleston Place, London, England

    A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Eccleston Place, London, England 13-18 May 2012 1 A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report About ULI ULI – the Urban Land Institute – is a non-profit research We are a think tank, providing advice and best practices in and education organisation supported by its members. a neutral setting – valuable for practical learning, involving Founded in Chicago in 1936, the Institute now has over public officials and engaging urban leaders who may not 30,000 members in 95 countries worldwide, representing have a real estate background. By engaging experts from the entire spectrum of land use and real estate development various disciplines we can arrive at advanced answers to disciplines and working in private enterprise and public problems which would be difficult to achieve independently. service. In Europe, we have around 2,000 members supported by a regional office in London and a small ULI shares knowledge through discussion forums, research, team based in Frankfurt. publications and electronic media. All these activities are aimed at providing information that is practical, down to ULI brings together leaders with a common commitment to earth and useful so that on-the-ground changes can be improving professional standards, seeking the best use of made. By building and sustaining a diverse network of land and following excellent practices. local experts, we are able to address the challenges facing Europe’s cities. Copyright ©2012 by ULI – the Urban Land Institute. ULI Europe, all rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the publisher.
  • 50 Years Ago – a Postscript

    50 Years Ago – a Postscript

    50 YEARS AGO – A POSTSCRIPT METROPOLITAN MODERNISATION Whilst some of us will recall the late-1950s and early 1960s as the period “when it all happened”, there was a lot going on much earlier. Here is a selection of what happened, details being obtained from the Traffic Circulars of the time. Some items may not be directly relevant but nevertheless are included for interest, if only that London Transport were bringing the Metropolitan Line up to date and ‘in line’ with the rest of the network. Date Brief details 02.01.50 “Stop-and-Proceed” abolished north of Harrow-on-the-Hill and all signals, semi- automatic and automatic, provided with signal post telephones. All trains to receive authority from relevant signalman before passing any signal at danger. Signal boxes affected were Watford Station (JL), Croxley (B), Watford Junction (C), Northwood (E), Pinner (G) and Harrow Station (JB). 01.50 Telephones provided on Chesham line (to signalmen at Chalfont & Latimer and Chesham) at One Mile Post, Two Mile Post and Three Mile Post. 04.06.50 Track slewed on a new alignment 30ft west of present from 1,000ft north of Watford South Junction to 1,500ft south of Watford South Junction, to allow bridges MR78, MR80 and MR81 to be taken out of use. 17.06.50 From midnight, maintenance responsibility for track, works & buildings and signalling between 28½ mile post (Mantles Wood) and 37 miles 195 yards, about ¾ mile south of Aylesbury South Junction, will be transferred from Railway Executive to London Transport. 25.06.50 London Transport to take over responsibility for management of ex-Joint Line from Harrow to Aylesbury South Junction including Watford and Chesham branches.
  • Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the Challenge

    Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the Challenge

    Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the challenge District heating networks are a key component These challenges and complexities are best of a future low carbon London. They will addressed by bringing together engineering, provide the means to capture and distribute planning, finance and regulatory expertise into heat from a diverse mix of primary as well as an integrated project delivery unit. secondary heat sources to serve homes and businesses. Development of district heating Arup’s multidisciplinary approach to district networks at scale across the capital over the heating project delivery underpins our work next ten years is therefore essential for London in London and across the UK. We support to meet the Mayor’s target of meeting 25% public and private sector clients from early of London’s energy needs from decentralised stage resource assessments and policy advice sources by 2025. through to scheme design, business case and procurement. We work closely with clients at Thanks to previous mayoral programmes such each stage to scope the opportunities, analyse as the London Heat Map and Decentralised the fundamentals and develop practicable Energy Masterplanning (DEMaP), the solutions for bankable projects. challenge today is no longer knowing where the opportunities lie; it is understanding how to deliver them in the face of multiple barriers, including: - long investment horizons; - limited windows of opportunity; - an opaque regulatory framework; - a stigma of poorly performing schemes in the past; and - limited experience among local authorities and developers. 2 Understanding the challenge Delivering solutions The unique working philosophy at Arup – Through our global knowledge management founded on flexibility, transparency and systems, we are able to harness ideas and ability to deliver – is ideally suited to practical experience from projects worldwide.
  • 5G Implementation in Non-EU Countries of Europe Region

    5G Implementation in Non-EU Countries of Europe Region

    5G IMPLEMENTATION IN NON-EU COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPE REGION ITU Regional Initiative for Europe on Broadband Infrastructure, Broadcasting and Spectrum Management © ITU November 2020 Version 1.2 5G Implementation in non-EU countries of the Europe Region ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper was developed by the ITU Office for Europe within the framework of the ITU Regional Initiative for Europe on broadband infrastructure, broadcasting and spectrum management. It was elaborated by ITU Office for Europe team including Mr. Iago Bojczuk, Junior Policy Analyst, and Mr. Julian McNeill, Consultant, under the supervision and direction of Mr. Jaroslaw Ponder, Head of ITU Office for Europe. Moreover, important feedback has been provided to this report by: - Electronic and Postal Communications Authority (AKEP), Albania; - Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, Albania; - Communications Regulatory Agency (CRA), Bosnia and Herzegovina; - Post and Telecom Administration (PTA), Iceland; - Ministry of Communications of Israel; - Office for Communications of Liechtenstein; - Ministry of Economy and Infrastructure of Moldova; - National Regulatory Agency for Electronic Communications and Information Technology (ANRCETI); - Ministry of Economy, Montenegro; - Agency for Electronic Communications and Postal Services (EKIP), Montenegro; - Ministry of Information Society and Administration, North Macedonia; - Agency for Electronic Communications of North Macedonia; - Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Telecommunications, Serbia; - Information and Communication Technologies Authority, Turkey; - National Commission for the State Regulation of Communications and Informatization, Ukraine; - Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS), United Kingdom; - Dicastero per la Comunicazione - Direzione Tecnologica, Vatican City. The paper was prepared as the background contribution to the ITU Regional Forum for Europe on 5G strategies, policies and implementation, held on 22 and 23 October 2020.
  • EE LIMITED and (2) HUTCHISON 3G UK LIMITED

    EE LIMITED and (2) HUTCHISON 3G UK LIMITED

    SECOND DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2021] CSIH 27 XA63/20 Lord Justice Clerk Lord Malcolm Lord Doherty OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by LORD MALCOLM in the appeal by (1) EE LIMITED and (2) HUTCHISON 3G UK LIMITED Appellants against JOHN STEWART DUNCAN Respondent Appellants: Barne QC; Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP Respondent: Upton; Davidson Chalmers Stewart LLP 7 May 2021 [1] This is an appeal against a decision of the Lands Tribunal for Scotland (the tribunal). The main issue concerns the proper approach to paragraph 33(14) of the Electronic Communications Code contained in schedule 3A to the Communications Act 2003, as amended by the Digital Economy Act 2017. This new code replaced the old code set out in schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1984. In terms of transitional provisions the old code remains relevant to agreements made under it. 2 Background [2] In 2003 Mr John Stewart Duncan (the owner) entered into an agreement with EE Ltd, which that company subsequently assigned to itself and Hutchison 3G UK Ltd (the operators), granting certain rights to keep, operate and inspect telecommunications apparatus on a site at Wester Dullatur Farm, North Lanarkshire. After the expiry of the agreed term in 2012 the lease has continued from year to year by way of tacit relocation (a rule under Scots law whereby a lease will be extended beyond its agreed term if neither party serves a notice ending the agreement). [3] In 2018 the operators sought agreement as to a new lease containing provisions designed to update the agreement in accordance with the minimum provisions imposed by the new code, including assignation rights; ability to share and upgrade the facilities without additional payment; and a “no network scheme” basis for the assessment of rental and compensation (which would be less costly for the operators).
  • We're Working Hard on How We Deal with Delays

    We're Working Hard on How We Deal with Delays

    Suggested alternative routes during disruption When Thameslink services from this station are subject to unplanned disruption, we have Issued Date: arranged for your ticket to be accepted as indicated below to get you to your destination May 2017 National rail and local bus alternatives Suggested alternative route details from Bedford Thameslink ticket holders To: Suggested routes: Walk (9 minutes/0.4 miles) via Woburn Road, Alexandra Road, Alexandra Place and Greyfriars to Bedford Flitwick, Harlington bus station; then bus 42# (from stand B) to your destination Walk (9 minutes/0.4 miles) via Woburn Road, Alexandra Road, Alexandra Place and Greyfriars to Bedford bus BEDFORD Leagrave station; then bus 81# Mondays to Saturdays only (from stand L) to Luton (Gallaxy Centre); walk (5 minutes/0.3 X5# X5# St Neots miles) to Luton (Silver Street) via Bridge Street and Library Road; then bus 23#, 27#, 28# to Leagrave MILTON Sandy KEYNES Walk (9 minutes/0.4 miles) via Woburn Road, Alexandra Road, Alexandra Place and Greyfriars to Bedford Flitwick Biggleswade CENTRAL Harlington 81# Luton bus station; then bus 81# Mondays to Saturdays only (from stand L) to Luton (Gallaxy Centre); then walk Arlesey (6 minutes/0.3 miles) to Luton Station Interchange via Bridge Street, Guildford Street and Station Road Leagrave 101 See above how to get to Luton Station Interchange; then bus A# (from stand 1) or bus 100 (from stand 4) LUTON Luton Airport Parkway to Luton Hampton Hotel; walk (2 minutes) to Luton Airport Parkway station via adjoining footpath Bletchley