The Roles of Serotonin and Dopamine in Reactive and Proactive Aggression

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Roles of Serotonin and Dopamine in Reactive and Proactive Aggression UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM – BRAIN AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE – COGNITIVE TRACK The roles of serotonin and dopamine in reactive and proactive aggression A literature thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Jonathan Krikeb, BSc, 10065180 12 June 2015 Supervisor: Co-assessor: dhr. prof. dr. C.K.W. de Dreu dhr. dr. M.P. Lebreton Krikeb, J., Serotonin and dopamine in predator-prey aggression Abstract: Aggression is often linked to violence but this is not a necessary connection. Aggression could also be motivating choices for economic-decision making. The question of what leads to aggression is what this paper will address as it discusses the bi-modal classification of aggression: proactive and reactive. These two classes will be linked to a new predator-prey research paradigm that separates the greed and its proactive tendencies, from the fear and its reactive actions. This, as well as a few other economic games, will be linked to the wide scope of research into aggressive violent behaviour, that is mostly based on clinical cases, as well as decision-making research that is founded on the idea that focuses on impulsive behaviour as it has been linked to aggression in the past. These past findings have also found correlations between serotonin hypoactivity, and also dopamine hyperactivity, in cases of irregular aggressive behaviour. We will attempt to establish how activities of the serotonergic and the dopaminergic circuitries parallel aggression in predator and prey type of interactions. 1 Krikeb, J., Serotonin and dopamine in predator-prey aggression Table of Contents 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................4 1.1. Aggressive behaviour.................................................................................................................4 1.2. Bi-modal classification of aggression.........................................................................................6 1.3. Aggression networks..................................................................................................................8 2. Experimental paradigms..................................................................................................................10 2.1. Aggressive behaviour in economic games...............................................................................10 2.2. The predator prey game..........................................................................................................11 2.2.1. Greed and calculated aggression in the predator............................................................14 2.2.2. PFC and goal-oriented behaviour....................................................................................14 2.2.3. Fear and reactive aggression in the prey.........................................................................16 2.2.4. Amygdala and fearful behaviour......................................................................................16 2.3. Aggressive behaviour in current research on neurotransmitters............................................18 2.4. Impulsive behaviour in experiments........................................................................................20 2.5. Experimental paradigms of impulsivity....................................................................................21 2.5.1. 5-CSRT..............................................................................................................................22 2.5.2. Go/no-go.........................................................................................................................22 2.5.3. SSRT.................................................................................................................................23 2.5.4. Reversal learning.............................................................................................................23 2.5.5. Delayed reward...............................................................................................................23 3. Serotonin.........................................................................................................................................23 3.1.1. Molecule..........................................................................................................................24 3.1.2. Different receptors in different brain regions..................................................................25 3.1.3. Tryptophan depletion......................................................................................................27 3.1.4. Tryptophan supplementation..........................................................................................28 2 Krikeb, J., Serotonin and dopamine in predator-prey aggression 3.1.5. Serotonin knockouts........................................................................................................28 3.1.6. Specific agonists/antagonists and neurotoxins................................................................29 3.2. Serotonin and impulsivity........................................................................................................29 3.3. Link between serotonin research to predator and prey behaviours........................................30 4. Dopamine........................................................................................................................................35 4.1.1. Molecule..........................................................................................................................35 4.1.2. Different receptors in different brain regions..................................................................35 4.1.3. Parkinson’s and L-dopa....................................................................................................37 4.1.4. Other manipulations to dopamine..................................................................................37 4.2. Dopamine and impulsivity.......................................................................................................38 4.3. Link between dopamine research to predator and prey behaviours.......................................38 5. Interactions between serotonin and dopamine...............................................................................39 6. Discussion........................................................................................................................................40 3 Krikeb, J., Serotonin and dopamine in predator-prey aggression 1. Introduction An attack to gain more resources by someone who has an abundance of them does not have the same motivation as the defensive reaction of the prey, in this same scenario, that defends its limited resources. In this sort of predator against prey interaction, two types of aggression come into play: proactive and reactive. Reactive aggression has been widely studied, often in context of impulsive aggression, while the literature on proactive aggression is more scarce. In light of the research into the motives behind these behaviours, and how this is reflected in terms of neurotransmitters, this paper will follow past studies and look at how the key neurotransmitters serotonin and dopamine interact in these two different types of aggression, namely predator and prey. 1.1. Aggressive behaviour Aggression traditionally requires a conflict between at least two parties that may compete for the same object, physical or otherwise (Nelson & Trainor, 2007).Since aggression and violence often go hand-in-hand, the results of aggressive behaviour often lead to damage, which is often physical, and therefore aggression is dangerous and not always the best choice in conflict circumstances. It does have an evolutionary role in food, or mate, acquisition, or protection, as well as inner motivations such as fear, greed, anger or even pleasure. When these motives lead to aggressive acts that hurt, or injure others, then we consider aggression as unaccepted in our current human society – war or criminal acts such as robbery or battery (de Almeida, Ferrari, Parmigiani, & Miczek, 2005). There is a wide selection of literature available on aggression, much of it is composed of psychological research focusing on clinical and criminal cases such as: workplace aggression (Hills & Joyce, 2013; Piquero, Piquero, Craig, & Clipper, 2013; S. F. Smith & Lilienfeld, 2013), domestic aggression (George et al., 2001; Soler, Vinayak, & Quadagno, 2000), alcohol and drug related (Anholt 4 Krikeb, J., Serotonin and dopamine in predator-prey aggression & Mackay, 2012; Badawy, 2003; de Almeida et al., 2005; George et al., 2001; Gowin, Swann, Moeller, & Lane, 2010; Skara et al., 2008), and arson (Linnoila, Virkkunen, & Scheinin, 1983). All this research shows how ingrained in human society aggression is and how destructive it could get, thus necessitating a deeper understanding of the motives behind it. In order to better understand aggression and its motives, different classification systems were established. In this paper, as the introduction suggests, we will focus on a binary classification system. Two other systems were suggested in previous studies as well. First, as described both by Siegel and Victoroff (2009) and Umukoro, Aladeokin, and Eduviere (2013) where they divide aggression into seven separate motivations it may originate from: fear -induced, maternal, irritable, inter-male, sex-related, predatory, and territorial.
Recommended publications
  • Peropsin, a Novel Visual Pigment-Like Protein Located in the Apical Microvilli of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 9893–9898, September 1997 Neurobiology Peropsin, a novel visual pigment-like protein located in the apical microvilli of the retinal pigment epithelium HUI SUN*, DEBRA J. GILBERT†,NEAL G. COPELAND†,NANCY A. JENKINS†, AND JEREMY NATHANS*‡§¶i *Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, §Department of Neuroscience, ¶Department of Ophthalmology, ‡Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; and †Mammalian Genetics Laboratory, Advanced BioScience Laboratories Basic Research Program, National Cancer Institute–Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD 21702 Contributed by Jeremy Nathans, June 19, 1997 ABSTRACT A visual pigment-like protein, referred to as bovine RPE binds to all-trans but not 11-cis retinal and absorbs peropsin, has been identified by large-scale sequencing of both visible and ultraviolet light (8, 9). The sequences of cDNAs derived from human ocular tissues. The corresponding retinochrome and RGR opsin form a distinct and highly mRNA was found only in the eye, where it is localized to the divergent branch within the visual pigment family (6, 10). retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Peropsin immunoreactiv- Whether retinochrome and RGR act as signal-transducing ity, visualized by light and electron microscopy, localizes the light receptors, participate in the visual cycle as retinal isomer- protein to the apical face of the RPE, and most prominently ases, or function in both capacities, is not known. to the microvilli that surround the photoreceptor outer seg- In the vertebrate eye, the RPE lies adjacent to the photo- ments. These observations suggest that peropsin may play a receptor cells and performs a number of functions critical for role in RPE physiology either by detecting light directly or by the viability and activity of the retina (11).
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Regulation of Serotonin 2A Receptor Responsiveness by Agonist
    Differential regulation of serotonin 2A receptor responsiveness by agonist- directed interactions with arrestin2 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Cullen Laura Schmid, B.S. Neuroscience Graduate Studies Program The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Laura M. Bohn, Co-advisor Georgia A. Bishop, Co-advisor Candice C. Askwith Wolfgang Sadee Copyright by Cullen Laura Schmid 2011 Abstract The G protein-coupled, serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor is a major drug target for the treatment of a number of mental health disorders, including schizophrenia, anxiety and depression. In addition to modulating several of the physiological effects of the neurotransmitter serotonin, activation of the 5-HT2A receptor mediates the psychotomimetic effects of serotonergic hallucinogenic drugs, such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) and 5-methoxy-N,N- dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT). Though hallucinogens are agonists at the 5-HT2A receptor, not all 5-HT2A receptor agonists induce hallucinations in humans, including the endogenous ligand serotonin. Therefore, the activation of the 5-HT2A receptor can result in different biological responses depending upon the chemical nature of the ligand, a concept that has been referred to as “functional selectivity.” One way in which ligands can induce differential signaling at GPCRs is through interactions with arrestins, which can act to dampen or facilitate receptor signaling cascades or mediate the internalization of receptors into intracellular vesicles. The overarching hypothesis of this dissertation is that the interaction between the regulatory protein, arrestin2, and the 5-HT2A receptor is a critical point in the divergence of agonist-directed 5-HT2A receptor responsiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Functionality of Proteins Involved in GPCR and G Protein Signaling: Making Sense of Structure–Function Continuum with In
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019) 76:4461–4492 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1 Cellular andMolecular Life Sciences REVIEW Multi‑functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder‑based proteoforms Alexander V. Fonin1 · April L. Darling2 · Irina M. Kuznetsova1 · Konstantin K. Turoverov1,3 · Vladimir N. Uversky2,4 Received: 5 August 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published online: 19 August 2019 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract GPCR–G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signal- ing cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand–GPCR and GPCR–G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defnes an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR–G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure–function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of diferently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fne-tuned by various post-translational modifcations and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specifc partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal 37.Pdf
    Biomaterials 34 (2013) 1911e1920 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Biomaterials journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biomaterials The activation of directional stem cell motility by green light-emitting diode irradiation Wei-Kee Ong a,1, How-Foo Chen b,1, Cheng-Ting Tsai b, Yun-Ju Fu a, Yi-Shan Wong a, Da-Jen Yen c, Tzu-Hao Chang d,e, Hsien-Da Huang d, Oscar Kuang-Sheng Lee f, Shu Chien g, Jennifer Hui-Chun Ho a,h,i,* a Center for Stem Cell Research, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan b Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan c Department of Material Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, HsinChu, Taiwan d Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, HsinChu, Taiwan e Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan f Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan g Departments of Bioengineering and Medicine, Institute of Engineering in Medicine, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA h Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan i Department of Ophthalmology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan article info abstract Article history: Light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation is potentially a photostimulator to manipulate cell behavior by Received 12 November 2012 opsin-triggered phototransduction and thermal energy supply in living cells. Directional stem cell Accepted 29 November 2012 motility is critical for the efficiency and specificity of stem cells in tissue repair. We explored that green Available online 19 December 2012 LED (530 nm) irradiation directed the human orbital fat stem cells (OFSCs) to migrate away from the LED light source through activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)/MAP kinase/p38 signaling Keywords: pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genetic Animal Model of Alcoholism for Screening Medications to Treat Addiction
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Int Rev Manuscript Author Neurobiol. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 April 29. Published in final edited form as: Int Rev Neurobiol. 2016 ; 126: 179–261. doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2016.02.017. A Genetic Animal Model of Alcoholism for Screening Medications to Treat Addiction Richard L. Bell, Ph.D.a,*, Sheketha Hauser, Ph.D.a, Zachary A. Rodd, Ph.D.a, Tiebing Liang, Ph.D.b, Youssef Sari, Ph.D.c, Jeanette McClintick, Ph.D.d, Shafiqur Rahman, Ph.D.e, and Eric A. Engleman, Ph.D.a aDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, USA bDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, USA cDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, 43614, USA dDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Center for Medical Genomics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, USA eDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA Abstract The purpose of this review is to present up-to-date pharmacological, genetic and behavioral findings from the alcohol-preferring P rat and summarize similar past work. Behaviorally, the focus will be on how the P rat meets criteria put forth for a valid animal model of alcoholism with a highlight on its use as an animal model of polysubstance abuse, including alcohol, nicotine and psychostimulants. Pharmacologically and genetically, the focus will be on the neurotransmitter and neuropeptide systems that have received the most attention: cholinergic, dopaminergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, corticotrophin releasing hormone, opioid, and neuropeptide Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Amy Sue Bogard University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    University of Tennessee Health Science Center UTHSC Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations (ETD) College of Graduate Health Sciences 12-2013 Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Amy Sue Bogard University of Tennessee Health Science Center Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations Part of the Medical Cell Biology Commons, and the Medical Molecular Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bogard, Amy Sue , "Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells" (2013). Theses and Dissertations (ETD). Paper 330. http://dx.doi.org/10.21007/etd.cghs.2013.0029. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Graduate Health Sciences at UTHSC Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (ETD) by an authorized administrator of UTHSC Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Document Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Program Biomedical Sciences Track Molecular Therapeutics and Cell Signaling Research Advisor Rennolds Ostrom, Ph.D. Committee Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, Ph.D. Edwards Park, Ph.D. Steven Tavalin, Ph.D. Christopher Waters, Ph.D. DOI 10.21007/etd.cghs.2013.0029 Comments Six month embargo expired June 2014 This dissertation is available at UTHSC Digital Commons: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations/330 Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells A Dissertation Presented for The Graduate Studies Council The University of Tennessee Health Science Center In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy From The University of Tennessee By Amy Sue Bogard December 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Amy Sue Bogard.
    [Show full text]
  • Etude Structurale Des Cassures D'hélices Et
    Etude structurale des cassures d’hélices et son application à la modélisation des récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPG) Julie Devillé To cite this version: Julie Devillé. Etude structurale des cassures d’hélices et son application à la modélisation des ré- cepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPG). Modélisation et simulation. Université d’Angers, 2007. Français. tel-00346950 HAL Id: tel-00346950 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00346950 Submitted on 12 Dec 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE D’ANGERS Année : 2007 N° d’ordre : 889 ETUDE STRUCTURALE DES CASSURES D’HELICES ET SON APPLICATION A LA MODELISATION DES RECEPTEURS COUPLES AUX PROTEINES G (RCPG) THESE DE DOCTORAT Spécialité : Bioinformatique ECOLE DOCTORALE D’ANGERS Présentée et soutenue publiquement Le : 19/12/2007 à : Angers par Julie Devillé Devant le jury ci-dessous : Dr J.F. Gibrat (rapporteur), DR, INRA, Jouy-en-Josas Dr I. Milazzo (rapporteur), MCU, UMR CNRS 6014, Rouen Pr C. Delamarche (examinateur), PU, UMR CNRS 6026, Rennes Dr C. Legros (examinateur), MCU, UPRES EA 2647, Angers Dr M. Chabbert (examinateur), CR, UMR CNRS 6214- INSERM 771, Angers Directeur de Thèse : Dr M.
    [Show full text]
  • (Raav)-Vector Elements in Ocular Gene Therapy Clinical Trials and Transgene Expression and Bioactivity Assays
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors (rAAV)-Vector Elements in Ocular Gene Therapy Clinical Trials and Transgene Expression and Bioactivity Assays Thilo M. Buck 1 and Jan Wijnholds 1,2,* 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), 2333 ZC Leiden, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Netherlands Institute of Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), 1105 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-71-52-69269 Received: 20 May 2020; Accepted: 10 June 2020; Published: 12 June 2020 Abstract: Inherited retinal dystrophies and optic neuropathies cause chronic disabling loss of visual function. The development of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors (rAAV) gene therapies in all disease fields have been promising, but the translation to the clinic has been slow. The safety and efficacy profiles of rAAV are linked to the dose of applied vectors. DNA changes in the rAAV gene cassette affect potency, the expression pattern (cell-specificity), and the production yield. Here, we present a library of rAAV vectors and elements that provide a workflow to design novel vectors. We first performed a meta-analysis on recombinant rAAV elements in clinical trials (2007–2020) for ocular gene therapies. We analyzed 33 unique rAAV gene cassettes used in 57 ocular clinical trials. The rAAV gene therapy vectors used six unique capsid variants, 16 different promoters, and six unique polyadenylation sequences. Further, we compiled a list of promoters, enhancers, and other sequences used in current rAAV gene cassettes in preclinical studies. Then, we give an update on pro-viral plasmid backbones used to produce the gene therapy vectors, inverted terminal repeats, production yield, and rAAV safety considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Material
    Supplemental material Systems Pharmacology Approach to Prevent Retinal Degeneration in Stargardt Disease Yu Chen, Grazyna Palczewska, Debarshi Mustafi, Marcin Golczak, Zhiqian Dong, Osamu Sawada, Tadao Maeda, Akiko Maeda, and Krzysztof Palczewski Table of Contents: 1. Supplemental Table 1. 2. Supplemental Table 2. 3. Supplemental Table 3. 4. References. 1 Supplemental Table 1. Expression of GPCRs in the eye and retina of C57BL/6J mice and the retina of a human donor eye (normalized FPKM values)A. Genes B6 mouse B6 mouse Human retina eye retina Rho 6162.04 11630.18 6896.09 Rgr 355.74 97.66 123.98 Opn1sw 125.13 198.54 31.69 Drd4 93.84 241.78 139.49 Opn1mw 62.97 95.77 172.56 Gprc5b 29.82 12.95 22.85 Gpr162 29.37 73.32 46.29 Gpr37 28.47 41.28 66.65 Ednrb 22.27 1.94 5.77 Rorb 21.69 23.52 24.31 Gpr153 20.42 37.18 15.31 Gabbr1 19.78 40.24 35.38 Rrh 19.29 9.23 40.34 2 Gpr152 18.55 40.46 3.05 Adora1 16.20 18.26 13.55 Lphn1 15.98 29.73 31.85 Tm2d1 15.56 10.31 17.63 Cxcr7 14.30 3.58 2.37 Ppard 13.68 19.37 21.61 Agtrap 13.64 17.21 8.18 Cd97 12.93 1.77 1.55 Gpr19 12.21 8.45 1.11 Fzd1 11.99 3.29 7.35 Fzd6 11.34 1.85 2.76 Gpr87 11.34 0.04 0.00 Lgr4 11.09 9.50 18.07 Drd2 10.82 23.10 26.33 Smo 10.75 6.35 5.91 S1pr1 10.66 11.21 11.78 Bai1 10.08 27.10 10.82 3 Glp2r 9.94 34.85 0.31 Ptger1 9.59 14.88 0.94 Gpr124 9.56 8.94 19.82 F2r 9.31 5.32 0.15 Adra2c 8.96 7.17 2.38 Gpr146 8.91 7.49 6.17 Vipr2 8.79 14.33 10.69 Fzd5 8.69 10.01 7.73 Gpr110 8.59 0.08 0.02 Adrb1 8.43 20.18 3.84 S1pr3 8.42 6.95 3.56 Gabbr2 7.80 17.03 10.57 Lphn2 7.66 9.02 8.79 Lpar1 7.47 0.91
    [Show full text]
  • (OPN5) (NM 181744) Human Tagged ORF Clone – RC214800
    OriGene Technologies, Inc. 9620 Medical Center Drive, Ste 200 Rockville, MD 20850, US Phone: +1-888-267-4436 [email protected] EU: [email protected] CN: [email protected] Product datasheet for RC214800 GPR136 (OPN5) (NM_181744) Human Tagged ORF Clone Product data: Product Type: Expression Plasmids Product Name: GPR136 (OPN5) (NM_181744) Human Tagged ORF Clone Tag: Myc-DDK Symbol: OPN5 Synonyms: GPR136; GRP136; PGR12; TMEM13 Vector: pCMV6-Entry (PS100001) E. coli Selection: Kanamycin (25 ug/mL) Cell Selection: Neomycin ORF Nucleotide >RC214800 ORF sequence Sequence: Red=Cloning site Blue=ORF Green=Tags(s) TTTTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGGCCGGGAATTCGTCGACTGGATCCGGTACCGAGGAGATCTGCC GCCGCGATCGCC ATGGCGTTAAATCACACTGCCCTGCCTCAGGACGAGCGCCTGCCCCATTACCTTCGAGATGGGGATCCTT TTGCTTCCAAACTTTCTTGGGAAGCGGATTTAGTGGCTGGCTTTTACCTAACAATAATTGGGATTCTGTC CACATTTGGAAATGGATATGTCCTTTACATGTCTTCTAGACGAAAGAAGAAGCTGAGACCCGCTGAAATA ATGACTATCAATTTAGCAGTCTGTGATCTGGGGATTTCAGTTGTAGGCAAGCCGTTCACCATCATCTCTT GCTTTTGTCACCGCTGGGTGTTTGGCTGGATCGGCTGCCGCTGGTATGGATGGGCTGGATTTTTCTTTGG CTGTGGAAGCCTTATCACCATGACTGCTGTCAGCCTGGATCGATATTTGAAAATCTGCTATTTATCTTAT GGGGTTTGGCTGAAAAGAAAGCACGCCTACATCTGCCTGGCAGCCATCTGGGCCTATGCTTCCTTCTGGA CCACCATGCCCTTGGTAGGTCTGGGGGACTACGTACCTGAGCCCTTCGGAACCTCGTGCACCCTGGACTG GTGGCTGGCCCAGGCCTCGGTAGGGGGCCAGGTTTTCATCCTGAACATCCTCTTCTTCTGCCTCTTGCTC CCAACGGCTGTGATCGTGTTCTCCTACGTAAAGATCATTGCCAAGGTTAAGTCCTCTTCCAAAGAAGTAG CTCATTTCGACAGTCGGATCCATAGCAGCCATGTGCTGGAAATGAAACTGACAAAGGTAGCGATGTTGAT TTGTGCTGGATTCCTGATTGCCTGGATTCCTTATGCAGTGGTGTCTGTGTGGTCAGCTTTTGGAAGGCCA
    [Show full text]
  • The Latrophilin Family: Multiply Spliced G Protein-Coupled Receptors with Di¡Erential Tissue Distribution
    View metadata,FEBS Letters citation 443 and (1999) similar 348^352 papers at core.ac.uk broughtFEBS to you 21482 by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector The latrophilin family: multiply spliced G protein-coupled receptors with di¡erential tissue distribution Hiroaki Matsushita, Vera G. Lelianova, Yuri A. Ushkaryov* Department of Biochemistry, Imperial College, London SW7 2AY, UK Received 2 December 1998 homologues, termed latrophilin-2 and latrophilin-3 (LPH2 Abstract Latrophilin is a brain-specific Ca2+-independent receptor of K-latrotoxin, a potent presynaptic neurotoxin. We and LPH3). Our results reveal that all latrophilins possess now report the finding of two novel latrophilin homologues. All the same architecture as unusual GPCRs, whilst multiple al- three latrophilins are unusual G protein-coupled receptors. They ternative splicing makes these proteins highly variable. Di¡er- exhibit strong similarities within their lectin, olfactomedin and ential tissue distribution of latrophilins and the ability of only transmembrane domains but possess variable C-termini. Latro- LPH1 to bind LTX suggest distinct functions for the members philins have up to seven sites of alternative splicing; some splice of this family of receptors. variants contain an altered third cytoplasmic loop or a truncated cytoplasmic tail. Only latrophilin-1 binds K-latrotoxin; it is 2. Materials and methods abundant in brain and is present in endocrine cells. Latrophilin-3 is also brain-specific, whereas latrophilin-2 is ubiquitous. The full size insert from the rat latrophilin clone R9-15 [11] was Together, latrophilins form a novel family of heterogeneous G used for conventional screening of a bovine brain oligo(dT)-primed protein-coupled receptors with distinct tissue distribution and cDNA library in VZAP II (Stratagene).
    [Show full text]
  • The Molecular and Cellular Basis of Rhodopsin Retinitis Pigmentosa Reveals Potential Strategies for Therapy
    The molecular and cellular basis of rhodopsin retinitis pigmentosa reveals potential strategies for therapy. Dimitra Athanasiou1, Monica Aquila1, James Bellingham1, Wenwen Li1, Caroline McCulley1, Philip J. Reeves2*, anD Michael E. Cheetham1* 1UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, 11-43 Bath Street, LonDon EC1V 9EL, UK 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK *CorresponDence shoulD be aDDresseD to Professor Mike Cheetham, [email protected] or Dr Phil Reeves, [email protected] Keywords rhoDopsin, GPCR, retinal Dystrophy, neuroDegeneration, mutation, protein misfolDing, proteostasis, therapy, protein traffic, enDocytosis, CRISPR 1 Contents Page Title page 1 Contents 2 Abbreviations 4 Glossary 6 Abstract 7 1. IntroDuction 8 1.1 IDentification of mutations in rhoDopsin (RHO) 8 1.2 Phenotypes of rhoDopsin associateD retinal Dystrophies 9 1.2.1 CSNB 10 1.2.2 arRP 11 1.2.3 aDRP 11 1.3 Variation in the RHO gene, when is a variant a mutation? 12 2. Structural anD biochemical basis of rhoDopsin RP mutants 14 2.1 Why so many Dominant rhoDopsin RP mutants? 14 2.2 The Distribution of RP mutants in rhoDopsin 15 2.2.1 RP mutations locateD in the N-terminus of rhoDopsin: the role of the N- terminal cap 15 2.2.2 RP mutations in the transmembrane helices 18 2.3 Structural stuDies of CSNB mutants 19 2.4 Dimerization Deficiency in adRP mutants 20 3. RhoDopsin biogenesis, post-translational moDifications anD trafficking 21 3.1 MisfolDing, ER retention anD instability 22 3.2 Post Golgi trafficking anD OS targeting 24 3.3 DisrupteD vesicular traffic anD enDocytosis 26 3.4 AltereD post-translational moDifications anD reDuceD stability 27 3.5 AltereD transducin activation 28 3.6 Constitutive activation 28 4.
    [Show full text]