DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis Master Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thesis Master Copy FEAR AND LOATHING IN ACADEMIA: CHALLENGING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN SCIENCE AND THE HUMANITIES IN THE MODERN UNIVERSITY by Lauren Jeanne DeGraffenreid A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2010 © COPYRIGHT by Lauren Jeanne DeGraffenreid 2010 All Rights Reserved iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Lauren Jeanne DeGraffenreid April 2010 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TWO: “BACK OFF MAN, I’M A SCIENTIST!” WHY I CHOSE TO TOUCH THIS SUBJECT WITH CONSIDERABLY LESS THAN A TEN FOOT POLE........................1 2. WHAT WE HAVE HERE...IS A FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE”: A BRIEF HISTORY OF AN INTERNECINE CONFLICT.............................................................29 3. QUE SAIS JE? STEPHEN JAY GOULD AND THE HUMANISTIC FIELD TRIP FOR SCIENCE.........................................................................................................................55 4. STOP COCKBLOCKING ME: GOULD, WILSON, AND THE FOXY REDHEAD AT THE END OF THE BAR.................................................................................................72 5. THE FORMLESS, MUTE, INFANT, AND TERRIFYING FORM OF MONSTROSITY: THE BIRTH OF PHILOSOPHY, SOCIOLOGY, AND THE RHETORIC OF SCIENCE.......................................................................................................................100 6. SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL: THE SPECTER OF RELIGION IN THE POPULAR SCIENCE NARRATIVE................................................................................................123 7. “IT’S JUST A JUMP TO THE LEFT” : ON THE BENEFITS OF BEING AN ACADEMIC TRANSVESTITE.....................................................................................154 v. ABSTRACT This paper examines the status of the conflict between science and the humanities in the context of modern university studies, and, through an examination of historical and disciplinary voices, suggests that such conflicts are not only needless, but unfounded as well. I propose a radical reorientation of the disciplines under the singular aegis of human cognition, and postulate that radical interdisciplinarity would lead not a dissolution of speciality, but rather to marked improvement in human epistemology. 1 CHAPTER 1 TWO: “BACK OFF MAN, I’M A SCIENTIST!”: WHY I CHOSE TO TOUCH THIS SUBJECT WITH CONSIDERABLY LESS THAN A TEN-FOOT POLE “We were somewhere around [a masters degree] when the drugs began to take hold...” -Hunter S. Thompson (well, sort of), Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas “Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable; you are a poor scientist, Dr. Venkman.” -Dean Yaeger, Ghostbusters “Maybe I shouldn’t be singing this song; ranting and raving and carry ing on. Maybe they’re right when they tell me I’m wrong....NAH!” -Dr. Denis Leary, “The Asshole Song,” No Cure For Cancer “Our present business is with inward preparation, especially the prepara tion of those who have ceased to be content with the old, and find no satisfaction in half measures. I have wished, and I still wish, to disturb no man’s peace of mind, no man’s beliefs; but only to point out to those in whom they are already shattered, the direction in which, in my conviction, firmer ground lies.” -D.F. Strauss, qtd by T.H. Huxley As a child, I once made a game of ramming a stick into a hornet’s nest and then running like hell. Needless to say, this was a bad idea (although it should be distinctly noted that I can run like the wind, and was only stung once, on the back of my left knee). As an undergraduate at Tulane, I frequently made a game of suggesting, in my own plac- idly infuriating way, that good expository writing in the field of comparative literature was not structurally different from the various forms of composition evinced by the hard sciences. After all, I would suggest time and again, both involve the presentation of hard 2 evidence in support of a theory. I meant only to provide evidence to this effect when I stated that I have unabashedly approached my scientific and humanistic journal articles heretofore with the exact same philosophical and rhetorical stance: I always 1) formulate a hypothesis 2) collect data 3) locate related scholarship and 4) explain why it matters (admittedly, this last one’s always been more of a challenge). Why were they getting up- set when they were told that what they held in their hands was actually a scientific paper, complete with abstract, and containing quotations and direct text instead of raw data? But as primal, incandescent rage filled venerable humanist eyes and untold scores of creaky formalists raised rusty scimitars, I would realize the amusing truth: I’m a slow learner. But as I attempted to parry the overweening thrusts of this new-age Army of Darkness and (only somewhat successfully, I confess) dodged the potent barbs of their domineering necromancer overlord, I wondered: why all the fuss over such a seemingly innocuous comparison? After all, students frequently charged Hamlet with being gay in my Shakespeare courses, and the professors never once projectile-vomited, nor (to my continued disappointment) did they commence violating themselves with Folger editions. Surely my claim wasn’t that outrageous. And besides, weren’t modern universities al- ways advertising the close working relationships between their various colleges and sub- sequent enrichment of their students? Was this all (gasp) mere lip service in reverence of the academic synergy gods? Did humanities and science faculty nod to one another as 3 they passed on the quad, only to hiss and make obscene gestures behind one another’s backs? Were silent alarms tripped when they tried to enter each other’s buildings? Did they put anti-humanist bear-traps by the coke machines and set anti-scientist claymores on the couches of the second-floor lounges? So, in the interest of full disclosure, I decided to ask. Ask my evolutionary biol- ogy professors, that is. Right smack in the middle of one of my evolutionary biology classes. In the presence of other evolutionary biology students. Because though I am pas- sionate about literature, I am, quite literally, a child of science. Geology and engineering have taken me around the world: I grew up in Malaysia and Venezuela. I’m a tomboy. I’m a geek. I like bugs, for heaven’s sake. I tend to collate data and look for trends and patterns and cause and effect (and once--swear to god--I had to reassure a cubicle-mate that I was not a robot, directly after an English professor told me my thought patterns re- sembled a computer algorithm). And, ironically, it is that quality that has made me an academically successful, professionally published scholar (my first humanistic paper was accepted for publication a semester before earning my masters degree): I am as compre- hensively thorough in my research as possible, and even my humanistic journal papers tend to read like validated hypotheses. But, as I said before, I am also a student of sci- ence. Since this doubtless will leave you quivering with antici....pation in regards to my personal viewpoints, I guess I might as well go for broke: I am a constructive empiricist: observation, evidence, and replicability are crucial for accurate interpretation of natural phenomena; of course, not all phenomena can be directly observed (as with atomic the 4 ory), but hypotheses can be validated if we can accurately and reliably predict the out- comes a theory explains (which is why metaphysics, religious ontology, and extreme postmodernism are all bunk). This is different from hard-line positivism, which teaches that only data we can perceive with our senses is reliable, that our theories must hold true for all times and places (obviously there are two grades of physics, so no) and that no human values can ever influence ‘true’ science. Nor am I a reductionist: like most mod- ern scientists, I do not believe that all human studies can be reduced to factors in a single, unilateral, big TOE (theory-of-everything). On the other hand, I do not believe that all disciplines inherently deal in separate, non-overlapping objectives and methods (Gould’s concept of non-overlapping magisteria, or NOMA). To believe this is to hint at extreme postmodernism, particularly the belief that, in academia, there is never any common ground; that no human can ever understand or relate to the condition of any but his disci- plinary fellows. On the other hand, knowledge is socially constructed. And so, caveat emptor: if you are irrationally opposed to any of these concepts, you as may well set this book down now, and save yourself some time and petty cash. And now, back to our story. I came ready for a fight. Finally, the appropriate moment came. My lips parted. The question was posed. Silence for several milliseconds...my breath caught in my throat. My heart pounded. I listened for the soft squish of dozens of sphincters violently clamping shut...but it never came. And then--a miracle. The professor shrugged. “Yeah, I guess that makes sense.” My eyes opened wide. My palms sweated, ready for a sneak 5 attack. I hung on his next words, hearing them in epic slow-mo: “Okay, that wraps it up for today. See you next time.” Students (normal, flesh-clad ones) were rising to leave, packing up notebooks and chattering about the midterm. No one seemed to care.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ten Misunderstandings About Evolution a Very Brief Guide for the Curious and the Confused by Dr
    Ten Misunderstandings About Evolution A Very Brief Guide for the Curious and the Confused By Dr. Mike Webster, Dept. of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University ([email protected]); February 2010 The current debate over evolution and “intelligent design” (ID) is being driven by a relatively small group of individuals who object to the theory of evolution for religious reasons. The debate is fueled, though, by misunderstandings on the part of the American public about what evolutionary biology is and what it says. These misunderstandings are exploited by proponents of ID, intentionally or not, and are often echoed in the media. In this booklet I briefly outline and explain 10 of the most common (and serious) misunderstandings. It is impossible to treat each point thoroughly in this limited space; I encourage you to read further on these topics and also by visiting the websites given on the resource sheet. In addition, I am happy to send a somewhat expanded version of this booklet to anybody who is interested – just send me an email to ask for one! What are the misunderstandings? 1. Evolution is progressive improvement of species Evolution, particularly human evolution, is often pictured in textbooks as a string of organisms marching in single file from “simple” organisms (usually a single celled organism or a monkey) on one side of the page and advancing to “complex” organisms on the opposite side of the page (almost invariably a human being). We have all seen this enduring image and likely have some version of it burned into our brains.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Jay Gould Papers M1437
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt229036tr No online items Guide to the Stephen Jay Gould Papers M1437 Jenny Johnson Department of Special Collections and University Archives August 2011 ; revised 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Stephen Jay Gould M1437 1 Papers M1437 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Stephen Jay Gould papers creator: Gould, Stephen Jay source: Shearer, Rhonda Roland Identifier/Call Number: M1437 Physical Description: 575 Linear Feet(958 boxes) Physical Description: 1180 computer file(s)(52 megabytes) Date (inclusive): 1868-2004 Date (bulk): bulk Abstract: This collection documents the life of noted American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science, Stephen Jay Gould. The papers include correspondence, juvenilia, manuscripts, subject files, teaching files, photographs, audiovisual materials, and personal and biographical materials created and compiled by Gould. Both textual and born-digital materials are represented in the collection. Preferred Citation [identification of item], Stephen Jay Gould Papers, M1437. Dept. of Special Collections, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Publication Rights While Special Collections is the owner of the physical and digital items, permission to examine collection materials is not an authorization to publish. These materials are made available for use
    [Show full text]
  • I Have Landed
    I Have Landed IHL 1. I Have Landed ......................................................................................................... 1 IHL 2. No Science Without Fancy, No Art Without Facts: The Lepidoptery of Nabokov 3 IHL 3. Jim Bowie’s Letter and Bill Buckner’s Legs .......................................................... 4 IHL 4. The True Embodiment of Everything That’s Excellent .......................................... 6 IHL 5. Art Meets Science in The Heart of the Andes: Church Paints, Humboldt Dies, Darwin Writes, and Nature Blinks in the Fateful Year of 1859 ......................................... 7 IHL 6. The Darwinian Gentleman at Marx’s Funeral ......................................................... 9 IHL 7. The Pre-Adamite in a Nutshell .............................................................................. 11 IHL 8. Freud’s Evolutionary Fantasy ............................................................................... 13 IHL 9. The Jew and the Jewstone ..................................................................................... 16 IHL 10. When Fossils Were Young .................................................................................. 18 IHL 11. Syphilis and the Shepherd of Atlantis ................................................................. 20 IHL 12. Darwin and the Munchkins of Kansas ................................................................ 22 IHL 13. Darwin’s More Stately Mansion ......................................................................... 23 IHL 14.
    [Show full text]
  • A Darwinist View of the Living Constitution
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 61 Issue 5 Issue 5 - October 2008 Article 1 10-2008 A Darwinist View of the Living Constitution Scott Dodson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Scott Dodson, A Darwinist View of the Living Constitution, 61 Vanderbilt Law Review 1319 (2008) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol61/iss5/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 61 OCTOBER 2008 NUMBER 5 A Darwinist View of the Living Constitution Scott Dodson* I. INTRODU CTION ................................................................... 1320 II. THE METAPHOR OF A "LIVING" CONSTITUTION .................. 1322 III. EVALUATING THE METAPHOR ............................................. 1325 A. MetaphoricalAccuracies and Gaps ........................ 1326 B. ConstitutionalEvolution? ....................................... 1327 1. By Natural Selection ................................... 1329 2. O ther O ptions .............................................. 1333 a. Artificial Selection ............................ 1333 b. Intelligent Design ............................. 1335 c. Hybridization.................................... 1337 IV. EXTENDING THE METAPHOR ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Index
    Stephen Jay Gould’s Essays on Natural History: A Cumulative Index Hyperlinks A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A Word of Introduction. This large file comines the indeces of all ten volumes of Stephen Jay Gould’s collections of essays reprinted from Natural History magazine. The goal is to reduce the effort to locate the reference to a particular person, item, or event; and similarly, to allow the reader to find all references to (say) Luis Alvarez in all volumes in one place. The row of hyperlinks will take you directly to the beginning of each letter’s section. To see this list at all times, click on the “bookmarks” icon in Adobe (found on the upper left of the screen). The file itself is also searchable, so you may seek the key word of your interest directly. As with all of these tasks, the identifying nomenclature is given as three or four letters followed by a number. The letters identify the volume; ESD refers to “Ever Since Darwin,” for example. (The entire sequence is listed below, in chronological order.) Similarly, the number refers to the order in which the essay appears in that volume, following Gould’s own numbering scheme. For ease of identification, I include the essay’s title as well. ESD: Ever Since Darwin. TPT: The Panda’s Thumb. HTHT: Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes. TFS: The Flamingo’s Smile. BFB: Bully for Brontosaurus. ELP: Eight Little Piggies.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Science Books Recommended by Various Teachers on NSTA's Listserv
    Good Science Books Recommended by various teachers on NSTA’s listserv - Apologies for not acknowledging individually those who contributed to this book list. - Have added details such as publisher, year, ISBN etc when these were easily accessible - Grateful for feedback (to [email protected] please) re errors etc. A million thanks. Herbert Tsoi, NSTA Life Member, Hong Kong. Author(s) / Editor(s) Name of book Publisher, Comments accompanying some of the original recommendations year of publication, ISBN Abbey, Edward Desert Solitaire Abbott, Edwin Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions The best introduction one can find into the manner of perceiving dimensions (Asimov). Thought provoking very short book. Ackerman, Diane A natural history of the senses Vintage Books, 1991. Ackerman, Diane The Moon by Whale Light: And Other Adventures Among First Vintage Books, 1992. Bats, Penguins, Crocodilians, and Whales ISBN 0-679-74226-3 Ackerman, Diane The Rarest of the Rare: Vanishing Animals, Timeless Vintage, 1997. ISBN 978- Worlds 0679776239 Adams, Douglas The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Adler, Irving & De Witt, The Wonders of Physics: An Introduction to the Physical Golden Press, 1966. ASIN Cornelius World B0007DVHGQ Albom, Mitch & Stacy Tuesdays with Morrie: An Old Man, a Young Man, and Broadway Books; (October Creamer, Stacy Life's Greatest Lesson. 8, 2002) ISBN: 076790592X Alder, K. The Measure of All Things: The seven-year odyssey and Free Press, 2002. The story of the two astronomers/scientists commissioned by the French Academy hidden error that transformed the world of Sciences to measure the length of the prime meridian through France in order to determine the length of the prime meridian and, thereby, the meter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox: Mending the Gap
    the HEDGEHOG, the FOX, and the MAGISTER’S POX [To view this image, refer to the print version of this title.] the HEDGEHOG, [To view this image, refer to the print version of this title.] MENDING THE GAP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND THE HUMANITIES the FOX, and the MAGISTER’S POX [To view this image, refer to the print version of this title.] STEPHEN JAY GOULD The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts • London, England 2011 Copyright © 2003 by Turbo, Inc. Foreword copyright © 2003 by Leslie Meredith All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Published by arrangement with Harmony Books, an imprint of The Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc. First Harvard University Press edition, 2011. Design by Lynne Amft Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gould, Stephen Jay. The hedgehog, the fox, and the magister’s pox : mending the gap between science and the humanities / Stephen Jay Gould. — 1st Harvard University Press ed. p. cm. Originally published: New York : Harmony Books, c2003. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-674-06166-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Science—Social aspects. 2. Science and state. I. Title. Q175.5 .G69 2011 303.48’3—dc21 2011017925 For the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), a truly exemplary organization, serving so well as the “offi- cial” voice of professional science here and elsewhere. With thanks for allowing me to serve as their president and then chairman of the board during the millennial transition of 1999–2001. This book began as my presidential address in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    ABSTRACT Science historian Ronald Numbers once remarked that the two most influential historians of science of the 20th century were Thomas Kuhn and Stephen Jay Gould. All historians are deeply familiar with Kuhn’s work and influence, and most know of the remarkable impact Gould has had on evolutionary theory through both his professional and popular works. But little attention has been paid to the depth, scope, and importance of Gould’s role ˆ as historian and philosopher of science, and his use of popular science exposition to reinforce old knowledge and generate new. This paper presents the results of an extensive quantitative content analysis of Gould’s 22 books, 101 book reviews, 479 scientific papers, and 300 Natural History essays, in terms of their subject matter (Evolutionary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Natural History, Paleontology/Geology, Social Science/Commentary), and thematic dichotomies (Theory-Data, Time’s Arrow-Time’s Cycle, Adaptationism- Nonadaptationism, Punctuationism-Gradualism, Contingency-Necessity). Special emphasis is placed on the interaction between the subjects and themata, how Gould has used the history of science to reinforce his evolutionary theory (and vice versa), and how his philosophy of science has influenced both his evolutionary theory and his historiography. That philosophy can best be summed up in a quotation from Charles Darwin, frequently cited by Gould: ‘All observation must be for or against some view if it is to be of any service’. Gould followed Darwin’s advice throughout his career, including his extensive writings on the history and philosophy of science. Keywords Darwin’s Dictum, dichotomies, evolutionary theory, grandeur, historiography, philosophy, Sagan Effect, themata, time This View of Science: Stephen Jay Gould as Historian of Science and Scientific Historian, Popular Scientist and Scientific Popularizer Michael B.
    [Show full text]