DOCSLIB.ORG

HISTORY the Real Authorsofthesepamphletsare Unlikely Ever Tobeestablished

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HISTORY the Real Authorsofthesepamphletsare Unlikely Ever Tobeestablished J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2005; 35:356–364 PAPER © 2005 Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh The excoriation of Benjamin Bell: who was ‘Jonathan Dawplucker’? MH Kaufman School of Biomedical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland ABSTRACT Because of a perceived lack of continuity of care of the surgical patients Correspondence to MH Kaufman, in the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, James Gregory, one of its managers, suggested School of Biomedical and Clinical that from 1800 a total of only six surgeons should be appointed full-time to that Laboratory Sciences, Hugh Robson institution. As considerable animosity existed between Gregory and John Bell, a Building, George Square, Edinburgh, senior Edinburgh teacher and surgeon, a pamphlet that was extremely hostile to EH8 9XD his activities was posted in prominent locations throughout Edinburgh. While the tel. +44 (0)131 650 3113 author was named as ‘Jonathan Dawplucker’ it was speculated that Gregory, or one of his close associates, was its real author. The contents of a second fax. +44 (0)131 650 3711 Dawplucker pamphlet, in the same style, but probably written by John Bell, was subsequently published. This was extremely hostile to Benjamin Bell, one of e-mail [email protected] Gregory’s close surgical colleagues. While much distress was caused at that time, the real authors of these pamphlets are unlikely ever to be established. KEYWORDS Benjamin Bell, care of surgical patients, Dawplucker pamphlets, James Gregory, John Bell, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh DECLARATION OF INTERESTS No conflict of interests declared. INTRODUCTION Towards the end of the eighteenth century, an enormous amount of bad feeling existed in the Edinburgh medical community. This was principally because of the suggestion that had been made by one of the managers of the Royal Infirmary, Professor James Gregory (1753–1821) (see Figure 1A), that the arrangements then in force for looking after the surgical patients in the House were both unsatisfactory and unacceptable. Gregory was a particularly influential figure on the Board of Managers of the Infirmary. From 1790 he had been Professor of the Practice of Physic in the University of Edinburgh, and subsequently held this post until 1821. He was also President of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh from 6 December 1798 until William Wright was elected to this office on 3 December 1801, and until his death was First Physician to the King in Scotland. The managers recognised from an early stage, after the establishment of the Infirmary, that it was of critical importance that there was both continuity of patient care FIGURE 1A One of the three of the individuals who might have and an adequate standard of clinical teaching achieved in authored the first Dawplucker pamphlet. Professor James the medical wards. Accordingly, from 1751, they Gregory, portrait by Sir Henry Raeburn, by courtesy Royal appointed two Fellows of the College of Physicians who College of Physicians of Edinburgh. were to be styled Physicians-in-Ordinary to the staff of faculty agreed to give a joint series of didactic lectures the Infirmary. The College of Physicians also arranged that each year. They each lectured for five weeks, and in this some of its Fellows should visit the Infirmary on a regular way covered the subjects of Anatomy and Surgery HISTORY basis. These men acted in a purely consulting capacity, (Alexander Monro primus), Chemistry in relation to were readily available, and could always be consulted by Medicine (William Cullen), the Institutes of Medicine, or the Physicians-in-Ordinary should this be needed. From Physiology (Robert Whytt) and the Practice of Physic, or 1757, four of the professors of the University medical Medicine (John Rutherford). The managers also assigned 356 The excoriation of Benjamin Bell: who was ‘Jonathan Dawplucker’? This was a theme approved by John Thomson (see Figure 1B). He was a young and ambitious surgeon, who had previously attended the Edinburgh Medical School, and gained the fellowship diploma of the Edinburgh College of Surgeons in 1793. He had previously spent a year in London attending the Great Windmill Street School, and gained a large circle of Whig friends in the Capital. In 1800, he was the youngest of the six surgeons appointed to the Infirmary. Shortly before this time, Thomson had indicated in his pamphlet that he was distressed: ‘by the present mode of allowing indiscriminately every young member of the College of Surgeons to take his turn of public duty in the Infirmary, some of them must be supposed to have but little previous preparation for so important a trust, so very arduous an undertaking.’ He did, however, express his reservations about the selection of the most senior and experienced surgeons, FIGURE 1B One of the three of the individuals who might have stating that: authored the first Dawplucker pamphlet. Mr John Thomson, by courtesy Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, artist ‘If the permanent surgeons were selected from unknown. among the older and more experienced members of the College, and who of course must be supposed to them special wards from where they could select be much occupied in private practice, they could not individual patients to illustrate their lectures.1 give that punctual, constant, and regular attendance, which is necessary in the conduct of the surgical A feeling had for some time existed amongst the department of the Infirmary.’ managers, as well as amongst many of the surgical patients, that they experienced little in the way of In this regard he was in agreement with Gregory’s more continuity of care in the Infirmary. For the previous three recent view on this topic. Thomson further indicated or more decades, all Fellows of the Edinburgh that, in his opinion, there were considerable advantages Incorporation (later Royal College) of Surgeons were to be gained by appointing permanent surgeons to the entitled to look after the surgical patients there. In order Royal Infirmary.3 In 1804, he was elected Professor of for this arrangement to function properly, the surgeons Surgery to the College of Surgeons, and in 1806, due to were required to work a rotation system. the influence of his Whig friends in London, he was appointed the first holder of the Regius Chair of ATTENDANCE OF THE SURGEONS AT THE Military Surgery in the University of Edinburgh.4 EDINBURGH ROYAL INFIRMARY BEFORE 1800 Two of the most distinguished surgeons who attended The attendance of the surgeons was on a number of the Infirmary between 1770 and 1800 were Benjamin occasions a cause for concern. In December 1793, for (1749–1806) and John Bell (1763–1820). While both example, the Board of Managers felt it necessary to set shared the same surname, they were unrelated.5 Both up a committee to enquire into the effectiveness of were skilful surgeons and impressive teachers of the the rotation system. They had noted that an increasing subject, although, as will be seen below, for the latter number of recently qualified surgeons were placing part of this period they were not on particularly their names on the register for service in the friendly terms. It is likely that one of the reasons for Infirmary, while the older and more experienced their animosity was because Benjamin Bell was a close surgeons were declining to do so. The Board was ally of Gregory, and had written a pamphlet in support forced to recommend: of the latter’s views on the staffing of the surgical wards of the Infirmary,6 while John Bell strongly ‘That no future Intrant Member of the College of opposed Gregory’s views on this topic. He also acted Surgeons shall be admitted to practise as an as the spokesman for the younger members of the HISTORY Attendant Surgeon in the Infirmary till after the lapse College of Surgeons.7 As the century drew to a close, of five years from the time of his being admitted a difficulties were encountered due to the increasingly member of the Incorporation of Surgeons.’2 irregular and less frequent attendance of the senior J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2005; 35:356–364 357 © 2005 RCPE MH Kaufman surgeons at the Infirmary. Gregory came to the another, one of the Surgeons-in-Ordinary be absent conclusion that continuity of patient care was the from the Infirmary, his, or their, posts would be filled by greatest priority, and could only be achieved if an the surgeon or surgeons next on the list. Their entirely new system of surgical cover was implemented successors in office were required to attend the in the Infirmary.8 When his views were offered to the Infirmary for one month before taking over their duties College of Surgeons they gained little sympathy from on a regular basis in order that they should become fully that and other quarters, and numerous acrimonious acquainted with all of the patients in the wards. The pamphlets were published, most of which were latter feature of his proposal was of particular directed towards the managers.9 importance in ensuring that continuity of patient care was maintained. SUGGESTIONS BY PROFESSOR JAMES GREGORY FOR THE STAFFING OF THE Despite a substantial degree of opposition from many of SURGICAL BEDS OF THE INFIRMARY the junior members of the College of Surgeons, on 23 December 1800, the managers appointed six members of It all came to a head in about 1800, when Gregory the College of Surgeons of appropriate standing to the six published his Memorial to the Managers of the Royal vacant posts. The six surgeons appointed, in the order of Infirmary.10 In this substantial pamphlet, he their seniority, were James Russell, Andrew Wardrop, recommended that a total of six full-time senior James Law,Andrew Inglis,William Brown, senior, and John surgeons should be appointed to the Infirmary by the Thomson.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1. Canongate 1.1. Background Canongate's Close Proximity to The
    Edinburgh Graveyards Project: Documentary Survey For Canongate Kirkyard --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Canongate 1.1. Background Canongate’s close proximity to the Palace of Holyroodhouse, which is situated at the eastern end of Canongate Burgh, has been influential on both the fortunes of the Burgh and the establishment of Canongate Kirk. In 1687, King James VII declared that the Abbey Church of Holyroodhouse was to be used as the chapel for the re-established Order of the Thistle and for the performance of Catholic rites when the Royal Court was in residence at Holyrood. The nave of this chapel had been used by the Burgh of Canongate as a place of Protestant worship since the Reformation in the mid sixteenth century, but with the removal of access to the Abbey Church to practise their faith, the parishioners of Canongate were forced to find an alternative venue in which to worship. Fortunately, some 40 years before this edict by James VII, funds had been bequeathed to the inhabitants of Canongate to erect a church in the Burgh - and these funds had never been spent. This money was therefore used to build Canongate Kirk and a Kirkyard was laid out within its grounds shortly after building work commenced in 1688. 1 Development It has been ruminated whether interments may have occurred on this site before the construction of the Kirk or the landscaping of the Kirkyard2 as all burial rights within the church had been removed from the parishioners of the Canongate in the 1670s, when the Abbey Church had became the chapel of the King.3 The earliest known plan of the Kirkyard dates to 1765 (Figure 1), and depicts a rectilinear area on the northern side of Canongate burgh with arboreal planting 1 John Gifford et al., Edinburgh, The Buildings of Scotland: Pevsner Architectural Guides (London : Penguin, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Baillie Gairdner, the Royal Medical Society and the Problem of the Second Heart Sound
    HISTORY MATTHEW BAILLIE GAIRDNER, THE ROYAL MEDICAL SOCIETY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE SECOND HEART SOUND M. Nicolson, Senior Lecturer, Centre for the History of Medicine, University of Glasgow, and J. Windram, Senior House Officer, Cardiology Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh SUMMARY In 1830, Matthew Baillie Gairdner (1808–88) was the first to propose that the second heart sound was produced by the closure of the semilunar valves. He proposed this theory, while a student at Edinburgh University, in an oral presentation to the Royal Medical Society (RMS). Gairdner (Figure 1) has been largely ignored by both nineteenth and twentieth century historians of cardiology. This paper presents an account of his life, his discovery and the scientific controversy to which he contributed, and argues that an appreciation of his work and that of his student colleagues should cause us to re-evaluate the significance of the RMS as a research forum in the early nineteenth century. FIGURE 1 Suggestions are made as to why his contribution to our Matthew Baillie Gairdner. From: A. Porteus; The History of Crieff understanding of the heart sounds has been neglected. from the Earliest Times to the Present Day. Edinburgh: Oliphant, Anderson and Ferrier; 1912. Reproduced with the kind INTRODUCTION permission of the Trustees of the National Library of Scotland. The Harveian Discourse for 1887 was delivered by Dr George W. Balfour, Consulting Physician to the Royal The character of Matthew Baillie Gairdner’s work and Infirmary of Edinburgh and a former President of the career is intriguing for several reasons. How did an Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.1 He outlined Edinburgh medical student manage to make a discovery the long debate which had taken place, from Laennec’s of such significance? Why has his contribution to the time to his own, regarding the nature and origin of the study of the heart been largely forgotten? And why did sounds of the heart.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Virtue: Or, How to Keep out of Harm's Way
    Medical History, 1987, 31: 123-142. HEALTH AND VIRTUE: OR, HOW TO KEEP OUT OF HARM'S WAY. LECTURES ON PATHOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS BY WILLIAM CULLEN c. 1770 by ROSALIE STOTT* I William Cullen MD (1710-90) has not generally been considered amongst the front rank of medical scholars.' His position as a professor in the Edinburgh Medical School, holding consecutively the chairs ofchemistry (1755-66), the theory ofmedicine (1766-73), and the practice of medicine (1773-89), and at the same time (1755-76) contributing to the clinical classes given by himself and his colleagues in the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, has ensured him a place in medical annals.2 Estimation of Cullen's particular contribution to medical science has, however, been qualified.3 His biographer, writing in the early decades of the nineteenth century, began an exercise in rehabilitation which, by focusing on the originality of Cullen's research, set the tone of most subsequent assessment. He has been seen, for example, as one of the "systematizers" ofthe eighteenth century, along with such men as Friedrich Hoffmann (1660-1742), Georg Ernst Stahl (1660-1734), and Albrecht von Haller (1707-77), each ofwhom created a theory ofhuman physiological organization from one fundamental concept.4 But Cullen's physiological base in neural function is considered derivative, a * Rosalie Stott, PhD, Hannah Fellow in the History of Medicine, HSC-3N10, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5. 1 The standard, and still most informative, source of information about Cullen is John Thomson, An account of the life, lectures and writings of William Cullen M.D., 2 vols., London, Blackwood, 1859.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sketch of the Life and Writings of Robert Knox, the Anatomist
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com ASketchoftheLifeandWritingsRobertKnox,Anatomist HenryLonsdale V ROBERT KNOX. t Zs 2>. CS^jC<^7s><7 A SKETCH LIFE AND WRITINGS ROBERT KNOX THE ANA TOM/ST. His Pupil and Colleague, HENRY LONSDALE. ITmtfora : MACMILLAN AND CO. 1870. / *All Rights reserve'*.] LONDON : R. CLAV, SONS, AND TAYLOR, PRINTERS, BREAD STREET HILL. TO SIR WILLIAM FERGUSSON, Bart. F.R.S., SERJEANT-SURGEON TO THE QUEEN, AND PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND. MY DEAR FERGUSSON, I have very sincere pleasure in dedicating this volume to you, the favoured pupil, the zealous colleague, and attached friend of Dr. Robert Knox. In associating your excellent name with this Biography, I do honour to the memory of our Anatomical Teacher. I also gladly avail myself of this opportunity of paying a grateful tribute to our long and cordial friendship. Heartily rejoicing in your well-merited position as one of the leading representatives of British Surgery, I am, Ever yours faithfully, HENRY LONSDALE. Rose Hill, Carlisle, September 15, 1870. PREFACE. Shortly after the decease of Dr. Robert Knox (Dec. 1862), several friends solicited me to write his Life, but I respectfully declined, on the grounds that I had no literary experience, and that there were other pupils and associates of the Anatomist senior to myself, and much more competent to undertake his biography : moreover, I was borne down at the time by a domestic sorrow so trying that the seven years since elapsing have not entirely effaced its influence.
    [Show full text]
  • PASSAGES of MEDICAL HISTORY. Edinburgh Medicine, 1750-1800.*
    PASSAGES OF MEDICAL HISTORY. Edinburgh Medicine, 1750-1800.* By JOHN D. COMRIE, M.A., B.Sc., M.D., F.R.C.P.Ed. In my ten-minute talk last May about the Edinburgh medical school I dealt with the founding of the Royal College of Physicians, the botanic garden, and the expansion of the Town's College into the University of Edinburgh through the establishment of a medical faculty in 1726. In the second half of the eighteenth century the medical school at Edinburgh became much more than a local institution, and not only attracted students from all over the British Isles, but was the chief centre to which men desiring to study medicine had recourse from the newly-founded British colonies through- out the world. Several of the teachers were men who attained great reputations. Dr Robert Whytt succeeded John Rutherford as professor both of the theory and practice of medicine in 1747, and was appointed largely because he was interested in medical research, a rare pursuit in those days. Stone in the bladder was a serious and frequent complaint which attracted great public interest and produced many reputed solvents for these calculi. Whytt had carried out an elaborate series of experiments in the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh with lime water, which he found to have a considerable power in disintegrating calculi, and he had published A n Essay on the Virtues of Lime Water and Soap in the Cure of the Stone. The treatment upon which he finally settled was to administer daily by the mouth water. He an ounce of soap and three pints or more of lime also published An Essay on the Vital and Other Involuntary Motions of Animals which brought him into conflict with the great Albrecht von Haller and gained him prominent notice on the Continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Glasgow University Library possesses an extensive collection of the papers of the Thomsons, a family of eminent nineteenth-century medical men. These form part of a larger set of Cullen-Thomson material. Some of these manuscripts were donated to the Library by John Millar Thomson in 1920; the remainder was discovered in the University Library Store in 1973. Among this latter set are a series of letters between Allen Thomson (1809-84) and William Sharpey (1802-80).' The bulk of this correspondence consists of letters from Sharpey to Thomson; but there are also several copies and drafts of the letters Thomson sent. These are valuable because Thomson's side of the correspondence has not otherwise survived. Letters from other individuals mentioned in the correspondence are also present. It seems that Thomson brought together all these letters, along with other documents, as sources for the obituary of Sharpey he was writing. A calendar of these letters will be found in the Appendix. This edition consists only of a selection of the letters. I have chosen those of most interest to the historian of medicine, and, in particular, those that bear on the roles played by Thomson and Sharpey as influential medical scientists and medical politicians in nineteenth-century Britain. Sharpey is the better-known of the two; he has been the subject of a lengthy article by D. W. Taylor.2 However, Taylor did not have access to a manuscript biography of Sharpey that Thomson composed in 1880, which provides much new information especially about Sharpey's early career.3 He was born at Arbroath in Forfarshire, Scotland in 1802, the stepson of a local medical practitioner.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Edinburgh Medical Men at the Time of the Resurrectionists *
    SOME EDINBURGH MEDICAL MEN AT THE TIME OF THE RESURRECTIONISTS * By H. P. TAIT, M.D., F.R.C.P.Ed., D.P.H. Senior Assistant Maternity and Child Welfare Medical Officer, Edinburgh Some time ago I was asked to give a paper to this combined meeting on some historical subject connected with the Edinburgh Medical s School. Since you are to be guests at a performance of Bridie " " The Anatomist tomorrow evening, it was suggested to me that I might speak of some of the medical men of Edinburgh at the time of the Resurrectionists. I hope that what I have to tell you tonight of may be of some interest and may enable you to obtain some sort " background for a more complete enjoyment of the play. The " of Anatomist centres round the figure of Dr Robert Knox, one he our leading anatomists in the twenties of the last century, and it was who gained an unwelcome notoriety by reason of his close association with Burke and Hare, the Edinburgh West Port murderers. Before proceeding to discuss some of the leaders of Edinburgh medi- cine at the time of Knox and the Resurrectionists, may I be permitted to give a brief outline of the Resurrectionist movement in this country- Prior to 1832, when the Anatomy Act was passed and the supply of anatomical material for dissection was regularised, there existed no legal means for the practical study of anatomy in Britain, save for the scanty and irregular material that was supplied by the gallows. Yet the law demanded that the surgeon possess a high degree of skill in his calling ! How, then, was he to obtain this skill without regular dissection ? The answer is that he obtained his material by illegal means, viz., rifling the graves of the newly-buried.
    [Show full text]
  • SURGICAL HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT of SURGERY | UNIVERSITY of SASKATCHEWAN Spring/Summer 2018 Journal of the SURGICAL HUMANITIES
    Journal of the SURGICAL HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY | UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN Spring/Summer 2018 Journal of the SURGICAL HUMANITIES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Francis Christian CONTENTS EDITORIAL BOARD Francis Christian Ivar Mendez Taras Mycyk Justine Pearl Ronald Nguyen Haisen Marlessa Wesolowski David Swann GRAPHIC DESIGN, COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING Department of Surgery University of Saskatchewan COVER PAGE Portrait of Wilder Graves Penfield Iris Hauser We thank the artist Iris Hauser for the image of the original piece of art and the description of the painting. CONTACT US Journal of the Surgical Humanities c/o Surgical Humanities Program Department of Surgery University of Saskatchewan Health Sciences Building 107 Wiggins Road, 4th floor, Suite B419 Saskatoon SK S7N 5E5 TEL: 306.966.7323 http://medicine.usask.ca/department/clinical/sur- gery-pages/surgicalhumanities.php 2 | JOURNAL OF THE SURGICAL HUMANITIES 04 EDITORIAL Francis Christian 06 WILDER PENFIELD OF MONTREAL: BRAIN CARTOGRAPHER Jose Francisco Tellez Zenteno and Lady Diana Ladino 09 COVER ART: PORTRAIT OF WILDER GRAVES PENFIELD Iris Hauser 10 SIR, I REQUEST THE HONOUR OF... JOSEPH LISTER & EDINBURGH Steven Kerr 26 OSLERIUM Francis Christian 29 CHAUVINISM IN MEDICINE PART 2 Sir William Osler 32 THE HAND TIE Ronald Nguyen Haisen 38 STR8-UP FROM DESPAIR TO HOPE MOVEMENT HELPING GANG MEMBERS Fr. Andre Pollievre 44 ZHIVAGO: DOCTOR IN LITERATURE Excerpts from memoirs of R. M. Kirk Chapter 7 Portrait of Wilder Graves Penfield 50 SUBMISSION GUIDELINES by Iris Hauser (Detail) JOURNAL OF THE SURGICAL HUMANITIES | 3 EDITORIAL Francis Christian, FRCSEd, FRCSC Department of Surgery University of Saskatchewan n Aldous Huxley’s original the pervasive use of search the simple rubric of enduring sci-fi novel, “Brave engine generated patterns of value through the ages, how New World,”(1931) the algorithmic behavior by modern much of the pop culture that government makes the drug man.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Medical Ethno Raph : Colonial Tra El, Stadial
    Modern Intellectual History, , (), pp. – © The Author(s) . This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/./), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. doi:./S : , , .1770–1805∗ School of Humanities, Languages and Social Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia E-mail: B.Buchan@griffith.edu.au This paper will present a comparative analysis of the ethnographic writings of three colonial travellers trained in medicine at the University of Edinburgh: William Anderson (–), Archibald Menzies (–) and Robert Brown (–). Each travelled widely beyond Scotland, enabling them to make a series of observations of non-European peoples in a wide variety of colonial contexts. William Anderson, Archibald Menzies and Robert Brown in particular travelled extensively in the Pacific with (respectively) James Cook on his second and third voyages (–), with George Vancouver (–) and with Matthew Flinders (–). Together, their surviving writings from these momentous expeditions illustrate a growing interest in natural-historical explanations for diversity among human populations. Race emerged as a key concept in this quest, but it remained entangled with assumptions about the stadial historical
    [Show full text]
  • H53 Ballingall Papers
    EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Handlist of Manuscripts: H53 BALLINGALL PAPERS (MS 3082-3) Identity Statement Dates of creation of material: 1801-1855 (predominant 1821-1855) Level of description: Fonds Extent: 1 box plus 1 volume of bound transcripts and 2 original (empty) boxes Context Name of Creator: Sir George Ballingall (1780-1855) Biographical History: Sir George Ballingall was Regius Professor of Military Surgery at the University of Edinburgh from the end of 1822 until his death in December 1855. After attending four literary sessions at the University of St Andrews Ballingall followed a course of medical studies at the University of Edinburgh between 1803 and 1806 (re-matriculating in 1816 to study chemistry and military surgery before formally graduating in 1819). He received his diploma from the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh, on 17 December 1805. Ballingall gained his expertise as an army surgeon between 1806 and his retiral on half-pay in 1818, during which time he saw service in India and witnessed the capture of Java in 1811 and the occupation of Paris in 1815. An elephant’s skeleton he prepared and sent to the anatomist John Barclay from Bangalore became the subject of a caricature drawn by Edinburgh artist John Kay as a comment on a controversial proposed professorship of Comparative Anatomy. The equally controversial professorship of Military Surgery was to occupy much of Sir George’s time and effort during his tenure in the post, as he fervently sought to impress upon the political authorities of the day the necessity of teaching military surgery as a separate discipline, and to establish similar chairs or lectureships in London and Dublin.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fellows
    Founding Members of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Alexander Abercromby, Lord Abercromby William Alexander John Amyatt James Anderson John Anderson Thomas Anderson Archibald Arthur William Macleod Bannatyne, formerly Macleod, Lord Bannatyne William Barron (or Baron) James Beattie Giovanni Battista Beccaria Benjamin Bell of Hunthill Joseph Black Hugh Blair James Hunter Blair (until 1777, Hunter), Robert Blair, Lord Avontoun Gilbert Blane of Blanefield Auguste Denis Fougeroux de Bondaroy Ebenezer Brownrigg John Bruce of Grangehill and Falkland Robert Bruce of Kennet, Lord Kennet Patrick Brydone James Byres of Tonley George Campbell John Fletcher- Campbell (until 1779 Fletcher) John Campbell of Stonefield, Lord Stonefield Ilay Campbell, Lord Succoth Petrus Camper Giovanni Battista Carburi Alexander Carlyle John Chalmers William Chalmers John Clerk of Eldin John Clerk of Pennycuik John Cook of Newburn Patrick Copland William Craig, Lord Craig Lorentz Florenz Frederick Von Crell Andrew Crosbie of Holm Henry Cullen William Cullen Robert Cullen, Lord Cullen Alexander Cumming Patrick Cumming (Cumin) John Dalrymple of Cousland and Cranstoun, or Dalrymple Hamilton MacGill Andrew Dalzel (Dalziel) John Davidson of Stewartfield and Haltree Alexander Dick of Prestonfield Alexander Donaldson James Dunbar Andrew Duncan Robert Dundas of Arniston Robert Dundas, Lord Arniston Henry Dundas, Viscount Melville James Edgar James Edmonstone of Newton David Erskine Adam Ferguson James Ferguson of Pitfour Adam Fergusson of Kilkerran George Fergusson, Lord Hermand
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Clan of the Bells, More
    MEMORIAL OF TH! CLAh OF THE BELLS. 1864. Az-^tj^ ^ &U- Ti4/*w*~t-L*&*. f^p^X^c National Library of Scotland *B0001 96756* Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from National Library of Scotland http://www.archive.org/details/memorialofclanof1864bell '<«£& *, #$£: mmtmstt ©f. t$e €lan of |g $£**& fiHon parttcularlu of tfje J3([iH$ of Jcirferonnfl |B€iH$ of JBInrbrffonsr, djhiefs of in<| gam^. 5)Srintcb ^risatelt) anb cnh) fcr a feto ftrtcnw iRiseeeiLSJiF. The following pages are printed for the purpose of obviating the liability entailed by possession of a few scraps and sketches. Under a vague idea of paying a compliment, those who know of such a collection may often request copies, and time and trouble must be expended if a graceful refusal cannot be substituted. Wherefore, as preferable, the cost of printing and the trouble of making woodcuts have been, once for all, incurred ; and he who criticizes the primitive roughness of the latter may try to do better with a bradawl and any wood except box, or remember the proverb anent " the gift horse." The Rammerscales MS. speaks for itself. It is now given iu blackletter type, and quasi antique form; but otherwise, not even a comma has been intentionally added to or taken from the copy. As to the Notes, a distance of some thousands of miles from probable sources of information will explain many imperfections, readily removable by any one more happily situated. U note*, l&mrnmsltn JRanusrriut, JUtno %*- ©opg of an oltr |KS, in tf>e Hifcrarg of tfje last Bell of Eammerscales, saitr to ftatoe been toritten about t&e seat: 1692.
    [Show full text]