Final Report (September 2014)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan Marine Biodiversity Working Group Marine Habitat Assessment Focus Group –Final Report (September 2014) 1. Relevant Aichi Biodiversity Target(s)/ CBD requirements(s) • Relevant Aichi Biodiversity Target(s) • Strategic Goal B – Loss of Habitat: By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced. – Sustainable Fisheries: By 2020, all fish and invertebrate stocks and aquatic plants are managed and harvested sustainably, legally and applying ecosystem based approaches, so that overfishing is avoided, recovery plans and measures are in place for all depleted species, fisheries have no significant adverse impact on threatened species and vulnerable ecosystems and the impacts of fisheries on stocks, species and ecosystems are within safe ecological limits. • Strategic Goal C – Protected Areas: By 2020, at least 17% of terrestrial and inland water areas and 10% of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representatives and well connected systems of protected areas and other effective areas- based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape. – Preventing Extinction: By 2020, the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained. • Relevant Convention on Biological Diversity Articles Article 7. Identification and Monitoring (a) Identify components of biological diversity important for its conservation and sustainable use having regard to the indicative list of categories set down in Annex I: 1 Annex I. Identification and Monitoring (1). Ecosystems and habitats: - containing high diversity, - large numbers of endemic or threatened species, or - wilderness; - required by migratory species; - of social, economic, cultural or scientific importance; or, - which are representative, unique or associated with key evolutionary or other biological processes; (2). Species and communities which are: - threatened; - wild relatives of domesticated or cultivated species; - of medicinal, agricultural or other economic value; or social, scientific or cultural importance; or - importance for research into the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, such as indicator species; and (3). Described genomes and genes of social, scientific or economic importance. (b) Monitor, through sampling and other techniques, the components of biological diversity identified pursuant to subparagraph (a) above, paying particular attention to those requiring urgent conservation measures and those which offer the greatest potential for sustainable use; (c) Identify processes and categories of activities which have or are likely to have significant adverse impacts on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, Article 8. In-situ Conservation (a) Establish a system of protected areas or areas where special measures need to be taken to conserve biological diversity: (b) Develop, where necessary, guidelines for the selection, establishment and management of protected areas or areas where special measures need to be taken to conserve biological diversity: (c) Regulate or manage biological resources important for the conservation of biological diversity whether within or outside protected areas , with a view to ensuring their conservation and sustainable use; (d) Promote the protection of ecosystems, natural habitats and the maintenance of viable populations of species in natural surroundings: 2 (e) Promote environmentally sound and sustainable development in areas adjacent to protected areas with a view to furthering protection of these areas: (f) Rehabilitate and restore degraded ecosystems and promote the recovery of threatened species, inter alia, through the development and implementation of plans or other management strategies: 2. Leaders Samantha Lee and Prof. Gray A. Williams 3. Key experts/ stakeholders who should be involved in the discussion: a. Within the Steering Committee/ working groups • Prof. Nora Tam • Prof. Paul Shin • Dr Ang Put • Dr Samuel Hung • Dr Cheung Siu Gin • Dr Qiu Jianwen • Dr Andy Cornish • Kevin Laurie b. Outside the Steering Committee/ working groups • Yu Yat Tung • Dr Terence Ng • Dr Wai Tak Cheung • Dickson Wong • Tony Nip • Stan Shea • Calton Law • Shadow Sin • Terence Fong • Dr Cheang Chi Chiu 4. Brief Summary on the meetings/ events organized One meeting was conducted with the members in November 2013. The subsequent discussions were made through emails. In December 2013, the leaders of the Focus Group connected with Ms Jihyun Lee, the secretariat of CBD (Environmental Affairs Officer for marine and coastal biodiversity) and sought her advice on an appropriate set of criteria to adopt in Hong Kong. 3 5. Aim / Objective To examine the best available scientific data and devise a mechanism with criteria for identifying marine “hotspot” areas (for various habitats and species). Information gaps will be reviewed, with conservation and management of potentially important marine habitats recommended. 6. Scope The criteria mechanism for assessing different marine habitats and taxa will be developed as the key output of this focus group. Recommendations on additional research and the construction of a definitive marine “hotspot” map will be suggested in the final report for the government to consider and follow up in 2015-2020. 7. Methodology a. Selecting the most appropriate Criteria System for identifying the Marine Hotspot “Marine biodiversity hotspots are areas of high species and habitat richness that include representative, rare and threatened features. Identifying and protecting marine biodiversity hotspots should contribute to the ecosystem-based approach to the management of our seas, through identifying which are the most valuable areas for biodiversity and where protection will yield benefits for the maintenance of ecosystem structure and functioning, including the biotic processes that drive them.”1 A set of sound criteria and appropriate ranking system is considered crucial to assess various marine habitats and species so as to identify the marine hotspots in Hong Kong coastal areas. This Focus Group investigated and proposed the most appropriate set of criteria which is applicable for assessing the marine habitats in Hong Kong. Decisions were made to establish whether existing criteria could be adopted, amended, or even a whole new set of criteria developed. b. Marine Hotspot Map The Marine Hotspot Map shall clearly illustrate the core locations of the sensitive marine species/ habitats which shall require better protection, with the aim that such a map can be used as a planning tool to help map out the current and future sustainable management of marine ecosystems. The production of a map showing biodiversity hotspots is considered as a vital planning tool that will help identify conservation 1 Hiscock K. & Breckels, M. 2007. Marine Biodiversity Hotspots in the UK: A report identifying and protecting areas for marine biodiversity. WWF-UK 4 areas, or ecologically important areas, which should be avoided in future coastal development. The map can be compiled from existing data (GIS is needed) with the input of various stakeholders/experts with interests or knowledge of the areas, combined with subsequent ground-truthing surveys. Constraints such as the location of the proposed/ on-going/ past infrastructure, existing/ proposed marine protected areas, shipping navigation channels etc shall also be identified on the map. This Focus Group would, however, only provide preliminary recommendations on the potential hotspot areas based on existing knowledge and experts’ input. Further research is required to complete the map and suggestions are proposed in this report for the construction of a comprehensive marine hotspot map which will need to be led by the government. c. Conservation and management of potentially important marine habitats As the city develops, the plight of our sea has been exacerbated by reclamation, pollution, dredging and dumping. Not only is the marine biodiversity in the local waters (such as Chinese white dolphins) at stake, but some previously common food fishes are close to local extinction. More and bigger protected areas in Hong Kong are needed to be able to secure the future of our marine life, and conserve our vulnerable marine environment for future generations. This Focus Group undertook a preliminary review of the potential marine protected areas proposed by the government in the last few decades to see if any of these falls within a designated hotspot area, with conservation and management of potentially important marine habitats recommended. 8. Hong Kong’s existing status a. Marine Biodiversity Hong Kong has a long coastline with more than 200 islands. Its special geographic location and hydrographic conditions contribute to the diverse and productive coastal and marine habitats found in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong marine environment supports rich and diverse marine species, with > 1,000 species of fish, 85 species of hard corals, two species of horseshoe crabs and marine mammals, etc. A recent study showed that a total of >5,700 species have been recorded, which makes Hong Kong's biodiversity comparatively rich as compared