DOCSLIB.ORG

Certain Railroad Employee Fatalities Investigated by the Federal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

e Certain Railroad Employee US. Department of Transportation Fatalities Investigated by Federal Railroad Administration the Federal Railroad Administration Calendar Year1 9 8 6 Office of Safety DOT/FRA/RRS August 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS P a g e IN T R O D U C TIO N ........................................................................................................ i CAUSE D IG E S T ........................................................................................................ i i SUMMARY OF ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED ..................................................... i v A C C ID E N T IN V E S T IG A T IO N REPORTS .......................................................... V b A INTRODUCTION This report represents the Federal Railroad Adm inistration's findings in its investigation of 45 railroad employee fa ta litie s suffered during 1986. Not included are the employee fa ta litie s that occurred as a result of train derailments, collisions, or rail-highway crossing accidents; these are reported in the 1986 Summary of Accidents Investigated by the Federal Railroad Adm inistration. * The purpose of this report is to direct public attention to hazards that exist in the day-to-day operation of railroads, to guide the overall Federal program to promote the safety of railroad employees, and to supply ra il management, ra il labor, and a ll other interested parties with inform ation and analysis for use in training and other action to prevent sim ilar a c c i d e n t s . J . W. W a ls h Associate Adm inistrator f o r S a f e t y CAUSE DIGEST REPORT NUMBER PAGE 1. Accidents related to switching and train operations a. Derailing equipment 1 1 b. Improperly lined switch 2 3 c. Crossing track in front of or going 5 10 between trains and/or equipment 6 12 37 94 d. Failure to clear for approaching train 11 23 16 38 22 54 26 67 e. Loss of secure handhold/or footing 15 35 27 69 30 76 f. Use of switches 17 41 g. Fall from bridge 24 61 h. Electrocution 29 74 2. Accidents related to maintenance-of-way inspections and operations a. Loss of a secure handhold and/or footing3 5 b. Falling from structure 10 21 23 57 c . F i r e 7 14 36 91 d. C ollision between h i-ra il and train 13 28 e. Failure to provide blocking protection 14 32 f. Turning rail 18 43 g. Shifting load 21 51 l i CAUSE DIGEST REPORT NUMBER PAGE h . Failure to clear for approaching train 25 64 41 1 0 5 44 114 i . Struck by ballast regulator 31 79 j • Shot by sniper 33 85 k . Lightning striking wayside phone 34 87 1 . Trench cave-in 43 1 1 0 m. Electrocution 19 45 Accidents related to inspection, servicing a n d maintenance of motive power, passenger, a n d fre ig h t equipment a . Electrocution 9 18 b . Loss of a secure handhold and/or footing12 26 c . Use of a mobile repair vehicle 20 48 38 98 d . Falling freight car body 28 71 e . Going between equipment 39 100 f . Falling plug-type car door 45 1 1 7 g . Close clearance 32 82 h . Use of h i-ra il crane 40 10 2 Automobile, highway, and truck accidents a . Rail-highway crossing accident 4 7 8 16 b . Automobile accident 35 89 42 108 i i i SUMMARY OF ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED INVOLVING ONE OR MORE FATALITIES R AILR O AD A C C ID E N T S ATSF 3 BO 1 BN 5 CBL 1 CR 10 CSSR 2 CSX 2 DWP 1 IC G 2 LI 1 MKT 1 MNCW 1 MP 1 NJTR 1 PATH 1 SBD 1 SOU 2 SP 2 UP 7 IV Accident Investigation Reports P a g e 1. Union Pacific Railroad Company T h o r t o n , I D ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Seaboard System Railroad, Incorporated L a k e l a n d , F L ........................................................................................................ 4 . 3. M issouri P acific Railroad Company M e r c e d e s , T X ........................................................................................................ 5 4. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company O k la h o m a C i t y , OK ...................................................................................... 7 5. Burlington Northern Railroad Company Inverness, M.............................................................................. T 10 6. Long Island Rail Road B a b y l o n , N Y ........................................................................................................ 12 7. Southern P acific Transportation Company W h e a t la n d , C A .................................................................................................. 14 8. New Jersey Transit R ail Operations H a r r i s o n , N J ........................................................................................................ 16 9. Southern P acific Transportation Company H o u s t o n , T X ........................................................................................................ 18 10. Illin o is Central Gulf Railroad Company W am ac, I L ................................................................... 21 11. The Baltim ore and Ohio Railroad Company C o n n e l l s v i l l e , P A ...................................................................................... 23 12. Consolidated R ail Corporation C l e v e l a n d , O H .................................................................................................. 26 13. Union Pacific Railroad C r i c k e t , A R ........................................................................................................ 28 14. Burlington Northern G a l e s b u r g , I L .................................................................................................. 3 2 15. Union P acific Railroad Company D u r a n d , K S ........................................................................................................ 3 5 16. Consolidated R ail Corporation C a m d e n , N J ........................................................................................................ 38 17. Illin o is Central Gulf Railroad Company C a r r i e r M i l l s , I L ...................................................................................... 4 1 v 18. Southern Railway Company I r o n d a l e , A L ........................................................................................................ 4 3 19. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company C l o v i s , NM .............................................................................................................. 4 5 20. Burlington Northern Railroad J a m e s to w n , N D .................................................................................................. 48 21. Consolidated R ail Corporation E a s t B r u n s w i c k , N J ...................................................................................... 5 1 22. Consolidated R ail Corporation E l y r i a , O H .............................................................................................................. 54 23. Consolidated R ail Corporation P i t t s b u r g h , P A .................................................................................................. 57 24. Southern Railway Company L u n c h b u r g h , V A .................................................................................................. 6 1 25. Consolidated R ail Corporation National Railroad Passenger Corporation R o m e , N Y .............................................................................................................. 6 4 26. Consolidated R ail Corporation National Railroad Passenger Corporation C h e e k t o w a g a , N Y ............................................................................................ 6 7 27. Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway R a n i e r , M N......................................................................... .............................. 6 9 28. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company B a r s t o w , C A ........................................................................................................ 7 1 29. Union P acific Railroad Company C r o c k e t t , T X .................................................................................................. 7 4 30. Connemaugh and Black Lick Railroad J o h n s t o w n , P A ........................................................................................................ 76 31. Metro North Commuter Railroad F o r d h a m , N Y .............................................................................................................. 7 9 32. Union P acific Railroad Company N o r t h P l a t t e , N B ............................................................................................ 8 2 33. Port Authority Trans Hudson K e a r n y , N J . ........................................................................................................ 8 5 34. CSX Transportation, Inc. C o o l i n g , G A .............................................................................................................. 8 7 vi 35. Union Pacific Railroad Company C r o w l e y , L A ................................................................................ 89 36. Consolidated Rail Corporation A s t a b u l a , OH .......................................................................... 91 37. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Houston, TX............................................................................... 94 38. Chessie System Railroads C i n c i n n a t i , OH .................................................................... 98 39. CSX, Transportation, Inc. E r w i n , T N ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Project Purpose and Need Statement June 2019

    Project Purpose and Need Statement June 2019

    Norfolk Southern Railway Company Pittsburgh Vertical Clearance Projects Project Purpose and Need Statement June 2019 INTRODUCTION: These proposed projects are railway improvement projects on the Pittsburgh and Fort Wayne Rail Lines (together referred to as the Pittsburgh Line), owned and operated by Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR). The proposed projects consist of addressing freight capacity and delay constraints through the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The Pittsburgh Line serves rail freight traffic in interstate commerce and operates as a primary link through Pittsburgh between Chicago and the New York/New Jersey commercial markets. NSR is a common carrier and the Pittsburgh Line forms a critical component of NSR’s route between Chicago and the east coast, carrying a variety of commodities, both hazardous material such as chlorine, anhydrous ammonia, hydrogen fluoride, crude oil, and ethanol, as well as nonhazardous materials like coal, auto parts and finished vehicles, lumber, agricultural products, and intermodal containers and trailers. The six overhead clearance projects [North Avenue Bridge, Pittsburgh (PC-1.60); Pennsylvania Avenue Bridge, Pittsburgh (PC-1.82); Columbus Avenue Bridge, Pittsburgh (PC-2.17); Ohio Connecting (OC) Bridge Flyover, Pittsburgh (PC-3.38); Washington Avenue Bridge, Swissvale (PT-344.91); and Amtrak Station Canopy (PT-353.20)] have vertical obstructions along the Pittsburgh Line and prevent efficient movement of freight, especially time-sensitive intermodal freight, by rail between Chicago and New York/New Jersey, and specifically through Pennsylvania. Unused capacity exists on the Pittsburgh Line and these clearance projects will allow the line to accommodate anticipated freight growth while allowing for double-stack intermodal freight to use the Pittsburgh Line in lieu of the Mon Line.
  • 2000 LIRR Report Card Results of the Annual, Independent Rider Survey from the Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council

    2000 LIRR Report Card Results of the Annual, Independent Rider Survey from the Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council

    The 2000 LIRR Report Card Results of the Annual, Independent Rider Survey from the Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council Michael T. Doyle Associate Director Joshua Schank Transportation Planner October 2000 Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 • www.lirrcc.org © 2000 LIRRCC Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the members of the LIRRCC for their invaluable efforts in performing survey research in the field, and the Long Island Rail Road for its cooperation during survey activities. The authors also gratefully acknowledge technical assistance provided by former PCAC Associate Director Alan Foster. The Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council (LIRRCC) is the legislatively mandated representative of the ridership of MTA Long Island Rail Road. Our 12 volunteer members are regular users of the LIRR system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Nassau and Suffolk County Executives, and Brooklyn and Queens Borough Presidents. The Council is an affiliate of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA (PCAC). For more information, please visit our website: www.lirrcc.org. Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Methodology 3 Results for Performance Indicators 5 Systemwide Results 5 Results by Branch 10 Results for Customer Comments 17 Systemwide Results 17 Results by Branch 20 Representative Customer Comments 25 Service Delivery 25 Service Requirements 25 Scheduling 28 On-Time Performance 31 Operations 32 Maintenance of Service During Severe
  • Long Island Rail Road Committee Monday, May 20, 2019

    Long Island Rail Road Committee Monday, May 20, 2019

    Joint Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting June 2019 Joint Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 6/24/2019 8:30 - 10:00 AM ET 1. Public Comments Period 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 20, 2019 MNR Minutes MNR Minutes - Page 5 LIRR Minutes LIRR Minutes - Page 13 3. 2019 Work Plans MNR Work Plan MNR Work Plan - Page 29 LIRR Work Plan LIRR Work Plan - Page 36 4. AGENCY PRESIDENTS’/CHIEF’S REPORTS MNR Report MNR Safety Report MNR Safety Report - Page 43 LIRR Report LIRR Safety Report LIRR Safety Report - Page 46 MTA Capital Construction Report (None) MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 50 5. AGENCY ACTION ITEM MNR Action Item Westchester County DPW&T Fare Increase Westchester County DPW&T Fare Increase - Page 59 6. AGENCY INFORMATION ITEMS Joint Information Items LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update - Page 61 MNR Information Items Diversity/EEO Report – 1st Quarter 2019 Diversity/EEO Report - 1st Quarter 2019 - Page 85 June-July Schedule Change June-July Schedule Change - Page 101 Lease Agreement with Winfield Street Rye LLC for a Café and Cocktail Bar at the Rye Station Building Lease Agreement with Winfield Street Rye LLC for a Café and Cocktail Bar at the Rye Station Building - Page 105 Discussion on Future Capital Investments LIRR Information Items Diversity/EEO Report – 1st Quarter 2019 Diversity/EEO Report - 1st Quarter 2019 - Page 107 July Timetable & Trackwork Programs July Timetable and Trackwork Programs - Page 124 Lease Agreement for Riverhead Station Lease Agreement for Riverhead Station - Page 129 7.
  • The Long Island Rail Road

    The Long Island Rail Road

    Long Island Rail Road Jamaica, NY September 10, 2018 General Notice No.4-23 Effective 12:01 AM Monday, September 10, 2018 (A) Entire Railroad Timetable Special Instruction 1901-B General Notice replacement pages for Special Instruction 1901-B On Pages I-92 and I-96, Special Instruction 1901-B has been revised as follows: On Pages, I-92 and I-96 under MAIN LINE Kew gardens and Forest Hills, in Sta. Cap. column, “4” has been changed to “6”, in the “6” car column, “H-4” has been changed to “*” and in the 8, 10, 12 car column, “H-4” has been changed to “H-6”. Employees must discard Special Instruction Pages I-91, I-92, I- 95, and I-96 and replace with Replacement Pages “I-91, I-92, I- 95, and I-96” attached to and part of this General Notice. (B) Entire Railroad Timetable Authority – General Notices General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A1) is annulled General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A2), 12 switch cross over paragraph – delete “(blocked and spiked normal)” and delete the last two paragraphs in their entirety. General Notice 4-21 Paragraphs (A3), (A4) and (A5) delete “see map on page 12” General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A6) delete “see map on page 11-13” General Notice 4-21 Paragraphs (A9) and (A10) delete “see map on page 13” General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (C4) delete “6th row containing information related to Giaquinto has been removed.” (C) Entire Railroad Timetable Station Pages Employees must make the following changes in ink: On Page III, Main line Branch, change “FARM 1 R-From Divide” to read “FARM R-From Divide” and change “FARM 2 R-From Divide” to read “PW R-From Divide”.
  • Freight Rail B

    Freight Rail B

    FREIGHT RAIL B Pennsylvania has 57 freight railroads covering 5127 miles across the state, ranking it 4th largest rail network by mileage in the U.S. By 2035, 246 million tons of freight is expected to pass through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, an increase of 22 percent over 2007 levels. Pennsylvania’s railroad freight demand continues to exceed current infrastructure. Railroad traffic is steadily returning to near- World War II levels, before highways were built to facilitate widespread movement of goods by truck. Rail projects that could be undertaken to address the Commonwealth’s infrastructure needs total more than $280 million. Annual state-of-good-repair track and bridge expenditures for all railroad classes within the Commonwealth are projected to be approximately $560 million. Class I railroads which are the largest railroad companies are poised to cover their own financial needs, while smaller railroads are not affluent enough and some need assistance to continue service to rural areas of the state. BACKGROUND A number of benefits result from using rail freight to move goods throughout the U.S. particularly on longer routes: congestion mitigation, air quality improvement, enhancement of transportation safety, reduction of truck traffic on highways, and economic development. Railroads also remain the safest and most cost efficient mode for transporting hazardous materials, coal, industrial raw materials, and large quantities of goods. Since the mid-1800s, rail transportation has been the centerpiece of industrial production and energy movement. Specifically, in light of the events of September 11, 2001 and from a national security point of view, railroads are one of the best ways to produce a more secure system for transportation of dangerous or hazardous products.
  • Line Structures

    Line Structures

    Meeting with New York Building Congress 5/24/2016 Line Structures Capital Program Investments Proposed 2015-2019 Capital Program Stations Other 10% 24% Track Power 30% 9% Shops and Yards Communications and 7% Signals Line Structures 14% 6% MTA Long Island Rail Road 2 Core Infrastructure Projects 2015 – 2019 Capital Program (Key Elements of the Program) LINE STRUCTURES Post Avenue Bridge Replacement, Buckram Road and Bridge Painting & Waterproofing projects STATIONS Babylon Station Platform Replacement, Murray Hill Station Elevators, Port Washington Station Improvements, Nostrand Avenue Station Rehabilitation TRACK Main Line Double Track Phase 2, Jamaica Capacity Improvements, Retaining Walls/Right of Way Projects COMMUNICATIONS Central Traffic Control System (Study, and Start of Migrations) Signal Babylon Interlocking Renewal SHOPS & YARDS Mid-Suffolk Yard, Morris Park Locomotive Shop POWER Replacement of Substations; Power Component Replacements MTA Long Island Rail Road 3 Line Structures Line Structures – Bridge Replacements (Design-Build) 2015-2019 Capital Program Post Ave. Bridge Replacement Buckram Road Bridge Replacement Design-Build Award 1st Quarter 2017 Design-Build Award 1st Quarter 2017 These Rail Road Bridges will need to be replaced over a weekend outage. Seeking the Best Method of Construction 5 Wreck Lead Bridge Mechanical Components Rehabilitation 2015-2019 Capital Program Design-Build Award 2nd Quarter 2017 Scope • The scope of this project is to provide for a mechanical overhaul of the movable bridge components of the LIRR single leaf rolling lift thru-truss bascule bridge over the Wreck Lead Channel in Island Park, Nassau. • Based upon Consultant’s inspection and testing results, bridge components will be replaced, cleaned, adjusted, re- lubricated, realigned or painted as needed to address any misalignments and to provide for the optimal balance condition during bridge operation.
  • SEMAPHORE March 2019 the LIST Meeting Will Be Held on Friday, March 15Th, 8Pm at the Historic Van Bourgondien House in West Babylon

    SEMAPHORE March 2019 the LIST Meeting Will Be Held on Friday, March 15Th, 8Pm at the Historic Van Bourgondien House in West Babylon

    SEMAPHORE March 2019 The LIST meeting will be held on Friday, March 15th, 8pm at the Historic Van Bourgondien House in West Babylon. This house is located at 600 Albin Avenue in West Babylon. The LIRR West Babylon Team Yard is located approximately 1/4 mile NW from the house also on Albin Avenue. Immediately adjacent to the house are soccer fields with a large parking lot for our use. Parking is also on site at the rear of the house down a long drivway. Albin Avenue is just off Arnold Avenue. Arnold Avenue begins at Route 109 on the north, just south of Sunrise Highway and on the south end it is off Great East Neck Road. THIS MONTH: The March show will be given by Kevin Katta: "50 Years Ago on the LIRR --1960's Into the '70's. The 60's-- Orange & grey action around Jamaica, Morris Park, Mineola and all around the system. The 1970's -the beginning of the MTA takeover. IN THIS ISSUE: Page 2 LIST Order Form Page 3 LIST Happenings Page 4 LIRR News Pages 5 & 6 LIRR Modeler Page 7 OBRM & RMLI Updates Pages 8 & 9 What are Cab Signals? For regular updates and other important information, visit: www.LIST-NRHS.org The Chapter mailing address is: LIST—NRHS P O Box 507 Babylon, New York 11702-0507 Page 2 SEMAPHORE The following price list is for LIST members only! #________LIRR Main Line East by D. Morrison *new book @$18 each Total _______ #________LIRR Trackside with Matt Herson by M. Boland @48 each Total________ #________LIRR Oyster Bay Branch @18 each Total________ #________2019 LIRR Calendar @$5 each Total _______ #________2018 LIRR Calendar @$2 each Total________ #_________The LIRR Co.
  • New York State Public Transportation Safety Board Rail Safety Section Abbreviated Report Case Number: 9260

    New York State Public Transportation Safety Board Rail Safety Section Abbreviated Report Case Number: 9260

    NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD RAIL SAFETY SECTION ABBREVIATED REPORT CASE NUMBER: 9260 DATE OF ACCIDENT: February 2, 2007 CARRIER: MTA Long Island Rail Road TYPE OF INCIDENT: Evacuation SYNOPSIS: On Friday, February 2, 2007, at approximately 6:37 p.m., the LIRR movement bureau placed a block on the four main line tracks in the Valley interlocking after the Valley Tower Operator reported that an electrical power wire was hanging low across the tracks. Valley Tower is located in the town of Valley Stream and the power wire from a Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) sub-station on the north side of the right-of-way extends overhead across to the south side of tracks. The wire had sagged to approximately five feet above the Long Beach #2 track; 10 feet above the Montauk #2 track; and four feet above the top of the head car on train #4153 on Montauk #1 track were it had stopped adjacent to the Valley Tower. The wire did not come into contact with the train. The movement bureau established a block on the #1 and #2 tracks of both the Montauk and the Atlantic lines, effectively shutting down traffic through the interlocking. This affected train movement on the Montauk, Far Rockaway, West Hempstead and Long Beach Branches. A total of 14 trains (eight eastbound and six westbound) were delayed between the Hall Interlocking (west of Jamaica Station) and the Merrick Station on the Montauk Branch when third rail power was shut off. Of the above trains, 8 of them stopped within the limits of the Valley Interlocking.
  • To Our Customers

    To Our Customers

    To Our Customers Babylon Branch dN Weekend Customers Effective: Saturday & Sunday, February 29 - March 1 NO WEEKEND TRAIN SERVICE Between Babylon and Rockville Centre Buses Will Substitute for Trains; Train Service between Rockville Centre & Penn Station Reduced to Hourly; Customers Advised to Use Alternate Branches What’s happening? On the weekend of February 29 - March 1, train service between Babylon and Rockville Centre will be suspended as LIRR forces perform critical work on the Meadowbrook Substation in Freeport and the new Massapequa Pocket Track. Buses will replace trains between Babylon and Rockville Centre. Train service between Rockville Centre and Penn Station will be reduced to hourly. Babylon Branch service will be affected as follows: Westbound: Customers at stations Babylon through Baldwin will board buses to Rockville Centre, then transfer for hourly train service to points west. Customers at Babylon Station can board a limited number of westbound Montauk Branch trains that will operate via the Central Branch through Hicksville to points west. Eastbound: Board hourly trains to Rockville Centre, then transfer for bus service to stations Baldwin through Babylon. Plan for up to 45 minutes of added travel time. To avoid busing, transfers and delays, customers are strongly advised to use alternate branches, including the Hempstead, Huntington/Port Jefferson, Long Beach and Ronkonkoma branches. To lessen the impact to customers, we will increase service on the Ronkonkoma Branch and add cars to Montauk Branch trains. The Meadowbrook Substation Replacement Project will provide increased third-rail power for our electric fleet and the Massapequa Pocket Track will facilitate turning trains east of Massapequa Station, increasing service flexibility and improving reliability.
  • STATE of NEW YORK Office of the Inspector General Metropolitan

    STATE of NEW YORK Office of the Inspector General Metropolitan

    STATE OF NEW YORK Office of the Inspector General Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to LIRR Service Disruptions, Winter 2007 Barry L. Kluger Inspector General Table of Contents Pages Structure of the Report ........................................................................................................ i Introduction ......................................................................................................................... ii PART I: Summary of OIG Findings and Response by LIRR Long Island Power Authority Infrastructure Concerns .................................................. 1 Communication Problems Identified ................................................................................. 2 LIRR Movement Bureau Needs Support .......................................................................... 6 Site Responders Need Clarity and Coordination .............................................................. 10 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 12 PART II: Response to LIRR Service Disruptions, Winter 2007 Downed LIPA Wires Cause Disruptions ............................................................................ 13 February 2, Valley Stream............................................................................................... 13 February 14, Seaford Station .......................................................................................... 20 February 20, Far Rockaway...........................................................................................
  • Proposed MTA Capital Program 2010-2014

    Proposed MTA Capital Program 2010-2014

    Proposed MTA Capital Program 2010-2014 September 23, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page OVERVIEW 1 The MTA 2010-2014 Capital Program-- “Preserving the Transportation System’s Rich Heritage for Future Generations” INTRODUCTION 15 Investment Summary and Program Funding CORE CPRB CAPITAL PROGRAM: 2010-2014 MTA NYC Transit Capital Program 25 Overview Program Plan MTA Long Island Rail Road Capital Program 53 Overview Program Plan MTA Metro-North Railroad Capital Program 77 Overview Program Plan MTA Bus Company Capital Program 101 Overview Program Plan MTA-Wide Security and Safety Capital Program 109 Overview Introduction MTA Interagency Capital Program 115 Overview Program Plan NETWORK EXPANSION: 2010-2014 MTA Capital Construction Capital Program 125 Overview Program plan MTA BRIDGES AND TUNNELS CAPITAL PROGRAM: 2010-2014 143 Overview Program Plan PROGRAM PROJECT LISTINGS: 2010-2014 165 Proposed 2010-2014 Capital Program (This page intentionally left blank.) Proposed 2010-2014 Capital Program THE 2010-2014 CAPITAL PROGRAM: Preserving the Transportation System’s Rich Heritage for Future Generations Introduction The MTA’s network of subways, buses and railroads move 2.6 billion New Yorkers a year, about one in every three users of mass transit in the United States and two thirds of the nation’s rail riders. MTA bridges and tunnels carry nearly 300 million vehicles annually—more than any bridge and tunnel authority in the nation. This vast transportation network –North America’s largest— serves a population of 14.5 million people in the 5,000 square–mile area fanning out from New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State and Connecticut.
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch

    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch

    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2018-1293 Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NS) Derailment Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania August 5, 2018 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2018-1293 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT SYNOPSIS On August 5, 2018, at 1:02 p.m., EDT, a Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NS) intermodal train 21QC105 (Train 1) derailed seven double-stack articulated intermodal cars with three wells each. Train 1 was traveling northbound in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on the NS Pittsburgh Division, Mon Line on Main Track 1 at 18 mph, on clear signal indication with the lead locomotive approaching Milepost (MP) ML 5.6 when the derailment occurred. There was no fire or injuries due to the derailment; however, there was significant damage to the Port Authority light rail system servicing Pittsburgh, including nearly a three-week service disruption and $1,800,000 in damage to infrastructure. Estimated railroad damages were $314,952 to track and signal, and $773,275 to equipment. At the time of the derailment, it was daylight with scattered clouds, 7 mph winds, and 80º F. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) determined probable cause of the derailment was T207 – Broken rail – Detail fracture for shelling or head check.