Gume Insects of Oregon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gume Insects of Oregon gumeInsects of Oregon Federal Cooperative Extension Service Oregon State College, Corvallis Extension Bulletin 749 August 1955 Legume Insects of Oregon Page How to Mix and Apply Insecticides Insecticide Formulations 4 Equipment and Application 6 Residue on Forage 6 Precautions in the Use of Insecticides 6 Chart of Insects Attacking Legumes 7 How to Identify and Control Injurious Insects Alfalfa caterpillar 8 Ladino clover seed midge 21 Alfalfa looper 8 Leafhoppers 21 Al f alf a weevil 8 Lesser clover leaf weevil 21 Blister beetles 10 Lygus bugs 22 Clover aphid 10 Meadow spittlebug 24 Clover case bearer 10 Nitidulid beetle 24 Clover flower midge 11 Omnivorous leaf tier 25 Clover leaf weevil 12 Pea aphid 26 Clover root borer 13 Pea leaf weevil 27 Clover root curculio 14 Pea weevil 27 Clover seed chalcid 15 Slugs 28 Clover seed weevil 16 Spider mites 30 Cutworms 18 Sweetclover weevil 31 Field crickets 19 Thrips 32 Grasshoppers 19 Vetch weevil 32 Western spotted cucumber beetle 33 How to Identify and Protect Beneficial Insects Damsel bugs 35 Minute pirate bug 37 Geocorus bugs 35 Parasitic insects 37 Lacewings 36 Syrphid flies 38 Ladybird beetles 36 Protect Bees 39 2 . E. A. DICKASON, Assistant Entomologist, and R. W. EVERY, Extension Entomology Specialist Oregon State College T F YOU are raising legumes for hay or seed, it is very likely you will have trouble with insects. Some insects attack foliage, others the blossoms or seeds. Still others damage roots or injure plants in the seedling stage. Informa- tion in this bulletin is the result of experimental work done at Oregon State College, other state college experiment stations, and by the U. S. Department of Agriculture. In the illustrations, actual size of the insect is shown as well as an enlarged drawing to aid in identification. Host plants and distribution of insects in the state, while not complete in all cases, help in recognizing insect pests. As a further aid in identifying injurious insects, the diagram on page 7 shows the point of attack of the most common pests. Mrs. Patricia R. Hansen, Corvallis, made the insect drawings in this bulletin. 3 Insecticide Formulations Pure insecticides are usually coarsein water, not dissolved. For this reason, or sticky solids or syrupy liquids thatsuspensions require constant mechani- cannot be sprayed or dusted. The in-cal agitation to prevent solid particles secticide is usually diluted with a neu-from settlingto the bottom of the tral carrier which may be an inert dustspraytank.Suspensionspraysare or a liquid. Water will not dissolveabrasive and cause rapid wear in gear- most insecticides. They may be sus-type pumps. pended, however, as fine particles in Suspension sprays are less hazardous water, or may be dissolved in a solventto the operator than solutions or emul- later emulsified in water. Some insecti-sions as most suspensions are not read- cides may be dissolved in kerosene orily absorbed through the skin. In han- other organic solvents to produce adling highly toxic insecticides, such as true solution. parathion, extreme caution should be observed not to inhale insecticides when Dusts concentrated wettable powder is emp- Most insecticidal dusts contain antied into the spray tank because the inert carrier such as talc, clay, or dia-powder has a tendency to billow up tomaceous earth. Others, such as sulfurfrom the tank opening. Suspension dusts, are merely finely ground insecti-sprays are also lesslikely to cause cides. Dusts are not as readily absorbedfoliage burning than the solution or through the skin as sprays, but mayemulsionsprays.Wettable powders be dangerous if inhaled. usually contain from 15 to 75 per cent Dusts usually contain from 1 to 10active ingredients. The amount of wet- per cent active ingredients. The per-table powder to be used per acre can be centage of actual insecticide in the dustdetermined from Table 1 on page 5. mixture is stated on the label. ThisFor example, 1 pound of actual DDT must be taken into consideration inper acre is suggested for vetch weevil computing the amount of mixed dustcontrol. If a 50 per cent wettable pow- to apply per acre. For example, 2der is used, it would require 2 pounds pounds of actual toxaphene per acre isof wettable powder, diluted with water, one of the suggested insecticides forfor each acre treated. control of lygus bugs on alfalfa or Ladino clover. If a 10 per cent dust isEmulsifiable concentrates applied, it would require 20 pounds of Emulsifiableoremulsion concen- the dust per acre. The amount of dusttrates are made by dissolving the tech- needed for any control is easily deter-nical grade insecticide in an organic mined from Table 1 on page 5. solventand adding an emulsifying agent. The concentrated material is di- Wettable powders luted with water to form an emulsion. The wettable powders, used to pre-Emulsion sprays are not abrasive and pare suspension sprays, contain an in-can be used in all types of sprayers. secticide blended with an inert dust. A Emulsion concentrates usually con- wetting agentisadded tofacilitatetain from 11 to 8 pounds of active mixing the powder with water. Thisingredientoractualinsecticide per forms a suspension rather than a solu-gallon. The amount is stated on the tion, as the fine particles are suspendedlabel. This is helpful in determining 4 the dosage to use in insect control. ForOil solutions example, in the early season control of Many insecticides are soluble in ker- alfalfa weevil, heptachlor at the rateosene, fuel oil, or other organic sol- of 4 ounces of actual material per acrevents. When applied as sprays, the is one of the suggested materials. Thesolvent evaporates from treated sur- 25 per cent emulsion concentrate con-faces leaving a deposit of insecticide. tains 2 pounds of heptachlor per gal-Oil solutions are widely used on spe- lon. When diluted with sufficient water,cialized insect control projects, such as 1 gallon, therefore, would treat 8 acres.forest insect pest control or grasshop- The amount of concentrate neededper control on rangeland. Oil solutions per acre can be determined from Tablelend themselves to low gallonage per 1 below. acre airplane application. For exam- Extreme caution should be used inple, to control grasshoppers on range- handling emulsion concentrates of pa-land, only 2 to 3 ounces of aldrin in rathion, TEPP, metacide, and demeton1 gallon of fuel oil per acre is required. (Systox). These are very toxic mate-Oil solutions are not recommended for rialsand can bereadilyabsorbeduse on legume crops because of the through the skin. Be sure to followdanger of burning foliage and blossoms precautions on the label. with the solvent. TABLE 1. INSECTICIDE APPLICATION. APPROXIMATE AMOUNTS OF FORMULATION NEEDED PER ACRE TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED AMOUNTS OF ACTUAL INSECTICIDE PER ACRE Desired insecticide per acre Formulation 2 ounces 4 ounces 8 ounces 1 pound 2 pounds Emulsionconcentratecontain- ing 11 lbs. actual insecticide per gallon. A qt. 5 qt. 11 qts. 25 qts. 11 gals. Emulsionconcentratecontain- ing 2 lbs. actual insecticide per gallon. 1 pt. 1 pt. 1qt. 2 qts. 1 gal. Emulsion concentratecontain- ing 4 lbs. actual insecticide per gallon. 4 pt. 5 pt. 1pt. 1 qt. 2 qts. Emulsionconcentratecontain- ing 8 lbs. actual insecticide per gallon. i pt. 4 pt. 1 pt. 1 pt. 1 qt. 25% wettable powder 8 ozs. 1 lb. 2 lbs. 4 lbs. 8 lbs. 40% wettable powder 5 ozs. 10 ozs. 14 lbs. 25 lbs. 5 lbs. 50% wettable powder 4 ozs. 8 ozs. 1 lb. 2 lbs. 4 lbs. 75% wettable powder 3 ozs. 6 ozs. 9 ozs. 11 lbs. 25 lbs. 1% dust 121 lbs. 25 lbs. 50 lbs. 100 lbs. 200 lbs. 21% dust 10 lbs. 20 lbs. 40 lbs. 80 lbs. 5% dust 10 lbs. 20 lbs. 40 lbs. 10% dust 10 lbs. 20 lbs. 5 Equipment and Application Most of the legume insects can bethan wettable powders should be used controlled with either aerial or groundin most types of low volume sprayers. application of dusts or sprays. Wettable powders require constant me- Dusts may be applied by airplane orchanicalagitationto keep them in ground duster. If a ground duster issuspension, cause excessive wear to used, a canvas drag behind the dustersome pumps, and frequently clog noz- will insure better coverage and improvezles. When using low volume sprayers, the control. With aircraft, the effectivethe best coverage is obtained when at swath width and the evenness of distri-least 15 to 20 gallons of spray per acre bution is less with dusts than it is withis applied. Nozzles that deliver a flat, sprays. To avoid drift, the dust shouldfan-shaped spray pattern are commonly be applied when there is no wind. used with low pressure, low volume In recent years, sprays have beensprayers. If the sprayer has been previ- used more than dusts for insect controlously usedtoapply hormone-type on legume seed crops. Aerial sprayherbicides such as 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T,it planes are usually equipped to applyshouldbethoroughlycleanedand either wettable powders or emulsionrinsed with sal soda, lye, or other neu- concentrates. Airplane sprays are usu-tralizing agents before being used to ally applied in 4-6 gallons of water perapply insecticides. acre. The airplane pilot frequently re- Orchard-type hydraulic sprayers hav- quests the grower to furnish flagmen,ing plunger or piston type pumps can or mark the effective swath width ofbe used for the control of legume in- each flight run along the edge of thesect pests. Wettable powders as well as field. emulsion concentrates can be used sat- Weed sprayers designed to apply lowisfactorily in these pumps. Nozzles volumes of spray at low pressures arethat deliver a cone-shaped spray pat- often used to apply insecticides. Emul-tern are frequently used with these sion concentrates of insecticides, rathersprayers.
Recommended publications
  • The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera)
    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTA (2010) Vol. 3 : 55-143 The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera) David MIFSUD1 & Enzo COLONNELLI2 ABSTRACT. The Curculionoidea of the families Anthribidae, Rhynchitidae, Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae, Erirhinidae, Raymondionymidae, Dryophthoridae and Scolytidae from the Maltese islands are reviewed. A total of 182 species are included, of which the following 51 species represent new records for this archipelago: Araecerus fasciculatus and Noxius curtirostris in Anthribidae; Protapion interjectum and Taeniapion rufulum in Apionidae; Corimalia centromaculata and C. tamarisci in Nanophyidae; Amaurorhinus bewickianus, A. sp. nr. paganettii, Brachypera fallax, B. lunata, B. zoilus, Ceutorhynchus leprieuri, Charagmus gressorius, Coniatus tamarisci, Coniocleonus pseudobliquus, Conorhynchus brevirostris, Cosmobaris alboseriata, C. scolopacea, Derelomus chamaeropis, Echinodera sp. nr. variegata, Hypera sp. nr. tenuirostris, Hypurus bertrandi, Larinus scolymi, Leptolepurus meridionalis, Limobius mixtus, Lixus brevirostris, L. punctiventris, L. vilis, Naupactus cervinus, Otiorhynchus armatus, O. liguricus, Rhamphus oxyacanthae, Rhinusa antirrhini, R. herbarum, R. moroderi, Sharpia rubida, Sibinia femoralis, Smicronyx albosquamosus, S. brevicornis, S. rufipennis, Stenocarus ruficornis, Styphloderes exsculptus, Trichosirocalus centrimacula, Tychius argentatus, T. bicolor, T. pauperculus and T. pusillus in Curculionidae; Sitophilus zeamais and
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Administrative Code Between the Dates of October 1, 2020 Through December 31, 2020 (Supp
    3 A.A.C. 4 Supp. 20-4 December 31, 2020 Title 3 TITLE 3. AGRICULTURE CHAPTER 4. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - PLANT SERVICES DIVISION The table of contents on the first page contains quick links to the referenced page numbers in this Chapter. Refer to the notes at the end of a Section to learn about the history of a rule as it was published in the Arizona Administrative Register. Sections, Parts, Exhibits, Tables or Appendices codified in this supplement. The list provided contains quick links to the updated rules. This Chapter contains rule Sections that were filed to be codified in the Arizona Administrative Code between the dates of October 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (Supp. 20-4). Table 1. Fee Schedule ......................................................47 Questions about these rules? Contact: Name: Brian McGrew Address: Department of Agriculture 1688 W. Adams St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Telephone: (602) 542-3228 Fax: (602) 542-1004 E-mail: [email protected] Website: https://agriculture.az.gov/plantsproduce/industrial- hemp-program The release of this Chapter in Supp. 20-4 replaces Supp. 20-3, 1-50 pages Please note that the Chapter you are about to replace may have rules still in effect after the publication date of this supplement. Therefore, all superseded material should be retained in a separate binder and archived for future reference. i PREFACE Under Arizona law, the Department of State, Office of the Secretary of State (Office), accepts state agency rule filings and is the publisher of Arizona rules. The Office of the Secretary of State does not interpret or enforce rules in the Administrative Code.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Isle of Man Appendices
    UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Isle of Man: Appendices. Author: Elizabeth Charter Principal Biodiversity Officer (Strategy and Advocacy). Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, Isle of man. More information available at: www.gov.im/defa/ This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Isle of Man chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to the Isle or Man is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5819 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 1 Table of Contents Appendix 1: Multilateral Environmental Agreements ..................................................................... 3 Appendix 2 National Wildife Legislation ......................................................................................... 5 Appendix 3: Protected Areas .......................................................................................................... 6 Appendix 4: Institutional Arrangements ........................................................................................ 10 Appendix 5: Research priorities .................................................................................................... 13 Appendix 6 Ecosystem/habitats ................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 7: Species ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weevils) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia
    September 2020 The Maryland Entomologist Volume 7, Number 4 The Maryland Entomologist 7(4):43–62 The Curculionoidea (Weevils) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia Brent W. Steury1*, Robert S. Anderson2, and Arthur V. Evans3 1U.S. National Park Service, 700 George Washington Memorial Parkway, Turkey Run Park Headquarters, McLean, Virginia 22101; [email protected] *Corresponding author 2The Beaty Centre for Species Discovery, Research and Collection Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, ON. K1P 6P4, CANADA;[email protected] 3Department of Recent Invertebrates, Virginia Museum of Natural History, 21 Starling Avenue, Martinsville, Virginia 24112; [email protected] ABSTRACT: One-hundred thirty-five taxa (130 identified to species), in at least 97 genera, of weevils (superfamily Curculionoidea) were documented during a 21-year field survey (1998–2018) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway national park site that spans parts of Fairfax and Arlington Counties in Virginia. Twenty-three species documented from the parkway are first records for the state. Of the nine capture methods used during the survey, Malaise traps were the most successful. Periods of adult activity, based on dates of capture, are given for each species. Relative abundance is noted for each species based on the number of captures. Sixteen species adventive to North America are documented from the parkway, including three species documented for the first time in the state. Range extensions are documented for two species. Images of five species new to Virginia are provided. Keywords: beetles, biodiversity, Malaise traps, national parks, new state records, Potomac Gorge. INTRODUCTION This study provides a preliminary list of the weevils of the superfamily Curculionoidea within the George Washington Memorial Parkway (GWMP) national park site in northern Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Roofs and Urban Biodiversity: Their Role As Invertebrate Habitat and the Effect of Design on Beetle Community
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-26-2016 Green Roofs and Urban Biodiversity: Their Role as Invertebrate Habitat and the Effect of Design on Beetle Community Sydney Marie Gonsalves Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Gonsalves, Sydney Marie, "Green Roofs and Urban Biodiversity: Their Role as Invertebrate Habitat and the Effect of Design on Beetle Community" (2016). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2997. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2998 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Green Roofs and Urban Biodiversity: Their Role as Invertebrate Habitat and the Effect of Design on Beetle Community by Sydney Marie Gonsalves A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Science and Management Thesis Committee: Catherine E. de Rivera, Chair Amy A. Larson Olyssa S. Starry Portland State University 2016 © 2016 Sydney Marie Gonsalves Abstract With over half the world’s population now living in cities, urban areas represent one of earth’s few ecosystems that are increasing in extent, and are sites of altered biogeochemical cycles, habitat fragmentation, and changes in biodiversity. However, urban green spaces, including green roofs, can also provide important pools of biodiversity and contribute to regional gamma diversity, while novel species assemblages can enhance some ecosystem services.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive DNA Barcode Database for Central European Beetles with a Focus on Germany: Adding More Than 3500 Identified Species to BOLD
    Molecular Ecology Resources (2015) 15, 795–818 doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12354 A comprehensive DNA barcode database for Central European beetles with a focus on Germany: adding more than 3500 identified species to BOLD 1 ^ 1 LARS HENDRICH,* JEROME MORINIERE,* GERHARD HASZPRUNAR,*† PAUL D. N. HEBERT,‡ € AXEL HAUSMANN,*† FRANK KOHLER,§ andMICHAEL BALKE,*† *Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB – ZSM), Munchhausenstrasse€ 21, 81247 Munchen,€ Germany, †Department of Biology II and GeoBioCenter, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Richard-Wagner-Strabe 10, 80333 Munchen,€ Germany, ‡Biodiversity Institute of Ontario (BIO), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada, §Coleopterological Science Office – Frank K€ohler, Strombergstrasse 22a, 53332 Bornheim, Germany Abstract Beetles are the most diverse group of animals and are crucial for ecosystem functioning. In many countries, they are well established for environmental impact assessment, but even in the well-studied Central European fauna, species identification can be very difficult. A comprehensive and taxonomically well-curated DNA barcode library could remedy this deficit and could also link hundreds of years of traditional knowledge with next generation sequencing technology. However, such a beetle library is missing to date. This study provides the globally largest DNA barcode reference library for Coleoptera for 15 948 individuals belonging to 3514 well-identified species (53% of the German fauna) with representatives from 97 of 103 families (94%). This study is the first comprehensive regional test of the efficiency of DNA barcoding for beetles with a focus on Germany. Sequences ≥500 bp were recovered from 63% of the specimens analysed (15 948 of 25 294) with short sequences from another 997 specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
    Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Records of Curculionoidea from the Regionowned Forest of Marganai
    ConsErvazionE haBitat invErtEBrati 5: 581–607 (2011) CnBfvr Records of Curculionoidea from the region­owned forest of Marganai and other localities of central­ southern Sardinia ( Coleoptera: Anthribidae, Attelabidae, Rhynchitidae, Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae, * Raymondionymidae, Dryophthoridae) Enzo COLONNELLI1, Bartolomeo Giuseppe OSELLA2, Paolo CORNACCHIA3 1Via delle Giunchiglie 56, I­00172 Rome, Italy. E­mail: [email protected] 2Via 24 Maggio 20, I­37126 Verona, Italy. 3c/o MiPAAF, Corpo Forestale dello Stato, Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale, "Bosco Fontana", Strada Mantova 29, I­46045 Marmirolo (MN), Italy. E­mail: [email protected] *In: Nardi G., Whitmore D., Bardiani M., Birtele D., Mason F., Spada L. & Cerretti P. (eds), Biodiversity of Marganai and Montimannu (Sardinia). Research in the framework of the ICP Forests network. Conservazione Habitat Invertebrati, 5: 581–607. ABSTRACT Collection, ecological and biogeographical data are given for 156 species of Curculionoidea (Anthribidae, Attelabidae, Rhynchitidae, Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae, Raymondionymidae, Dryophthoridae), mostly from the Iglesias area. This number represents 26% of all Curculionoidea thus far recorded from Sardinia. New records for the island are: Dorytomus dejeani Faust, 1882 (Curculionidae), Enedreytes hilaris Fåhraeus, 1839 (Anthribidae) and Stereonychus phyllireae Chevrolat, 1859 (Curculionidae). The occurrence in Sardinia of Polydrusus cervinus (Linnaeus,
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophagous Coleoptera Associated with Habitats Of
    PHYTOPHAGOUS COLEOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH HABITATS OF DIFFERENT SUCCESSIONAL AGE PAUL SPENCER HYMAN, B.Sc. (C.N.A.A.). A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and for the Diploma of Imperial College. Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College, Si1wood Park, Ascot, Berkshire. May 1983. - %i - the memory of my father Gerry To my mother Mavis, and Alan and to my Uncle Joe - -iti - ABSTRACT Phytophagous Coleoptera from the superfamilies Curculionoidea and Chrysomeloidea are described and compared in relation to plant assemblages along a successional gradient. Experimental sites at Silwood Park, Berkshire represented areas of different successional age. A series of sites, established between 1977-1981 from harrowed land comprised, an early succession 0-5 years old, an area of per- manent grassland a mid successional site, 10-11 years old, and a pre- dominantly birch woodland a late successional site, in excess of 60 years old. Insect material was collected from ground vegetation using a D-vac. suction sampler, whilst material from the birch canopy was collected using a beating bag. All ground vegetation was monitored using pin quadrats. Canopy foliage was not recorded. All beetles and plants were identified to species. Ecological trends in diversity (a and 6), dominance and equita- bility for beetles and plants are described and compared along the successional gradient and discussed in terms of current ecological theory. Insect/plant interactions are analysed and discussed in terms of previously described ecological trends, degree of specialism (feeding specificity) of beetles, niche (diet) breadth, plant apparency and plant life-form (life-history strategy).
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    Skuhrovec, J (2009): Taxonomic changes inside Hyperini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Hyperinae). - SNUDEBILLER 10, Studies on taxonomy, biology and ecology of Curculionoidea, Mönchengladbach: CURCULIO-Institute. - This article can be found in: "(CD):\Data\10dtext154.rtf" Taxonomic changes inside Hyperini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Hyperinae) by Jiří Skuhrovec, Prague with 15 photographs, 5 maps [Skuhrovec] Manuscript received: 30th March 2009 Accepted: 20th April 2009 Abstract. Hypera mariei (Hoffmann, 1933) was identified as new synonym of Hypera postica (Gyllenhal, 1813). Lectotypes and paralectotypes for the following species are designated and illustrated: Hypera dapalis (Boheman, 1834), Hypera striata (Boheman, 1834) and Donus chlorocomus (Boheman, 1842). Keywords Taxonomy, Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Hyperini, new synonym, lectotypes, paralectotype, Palaearctic region. Introduction The tribe Hyperini has been allocated several important taxonomic, morphological and ecological papers in the last ten years [Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal 1999, 2002] [Winkelmann 2001, 2006] [Alonso-Zarazaga 2005] [Skuhrovec 2005, 2006a,b, 2007, 2008, 2009] [Legalov 2007] [Skuhrovec & Borovec 2007] [Winkelmann & Bayer 2007] [Skuhrovec & Winkelmann 2008]. The last comprehensive and important taxonomic changes were published by Skuhrovec [Skuhrovec 2008]. The last two comprehensive revisions of Caucasian Donus species [Skuhrovec & Borovec 2007] and subgenus Dapalinus [Skuhrovec & Winkelmann 2008] included undesignated lectotypes of some species, e.g. Hypera dapalis
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage 219 Q3 2015
    No. 219 1 July - 30 September 2015 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Sue Graham, 5 Lychgate Close , Cropston, Leics. LE7 7HU Tel: 0116-2366474 Ian and Pat Evans win National Award The National Biodiversity Network (http://nbn.org.uk/) has recently inaugurated awards for services to biological recording. The first Gilbert White Adult Award for Terrestrial and Freshwater Wildlife has been awarded to Ian Evans and the late Pat Evans, whom we remember with affection from their days in Leicestershire. Gilbert White (1720-1793) is remembered in these awards because his name is synonymous with biological recording. He was one of the first English naturalists to make careful observations of his surroundings and record these observations in a systematic way. He transformed the way we look at the natural world and is recognised as one of the fathers of ecology. From the NBN website: IN THIS EDITION “Pat and Ian, a husband and wife team have CLASSIFIED RECORDS been tireless exponents of and ambassadors for biological recording for many years. They have Ÿ Mammals Page 2 submitted 14,295 records to the Highland Biological Recording Group database in multiple Ÿ Birds Page 3 taxonomic groups including butterflies and moths, Ÿ mammals, fungi, lichens, dragonflies, vascular Reptiles and Amphibians Page 9 plants, annelids, molluscs, arachnids, fish, Ÿ Fish Page 9 amphibians, reptiles, and many different insect groups. Pat Evans co-authored the ‘Flora of Ÿ Dragonflies & Damselflies Page 10 Leicestershire’ and the ‘Flora of Assynt’, while Ian Evans held many Committee positions of the Ÿ Grasshoppers & Bushcrickets Page 12 Highland Biological Recording Group and was involved in the publication of ‘Wildlife of Scourie’ Ÿ Butterflies Page 12 Ÿ Moths Page 15 Ÿ Beetles Page 18 Ÿ Other Insects Page 21 Ÿ Plants and Ferns Page 26 Ÿ Other Records Page 27 Ÿ Weather Page 28 Ÿ Acknowledgements Page 29 Ian & Pat Evans in the field © Gordon Rothero LNC Heritage Edition 219 Page 1 in 2006 and ‘Wildlife of Rogart’ in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture Demonstration of Practices and Technologies
    Agricultural Demonstration of Practices and Technologies (ADOPT) Applications for these ADOPT projects were submitted for the Nov. 22, 2019 deadline and funding was approved by the Minister on February 5, 2020. Project titles identified with an asterisk (*) were co‐ funded by the ministry and Fertilizer Canada. Projects will be initiated in the spring of 2020. Conservation Learning Centre (CLC) Alternative cropping options for North Central Saskatchewan $ 7,200 Cover crop variety and seeding date trial for weed suppression under organic management system $17,540 Demonstrating InVigor canola salt tolerance of varying seed size vs barley $10,000 Improving nitrogen use efficiency in Brassica (cole) vegetable production $10,000 District 26 ADD Board Demonstrating the effect of fall cutting date on forage legumes $ 7,700 East Central Research Corporation (ECRF) *Canola seed safety and yield response to novel P sources in Saskatchewan soils $ 7,388 *Demonstrating 4R Nitrogen principles in relation to yield and protein management of spring wheat $ 5,670 Dry bean response to Nitrogen fertilizer rate in dryland, solid‐seeded production $ 4,850 Effect of spray management on leaf disease and Fusarium Head Blight of wheat $ 6,860 Forage yield and quality of barley, oats and triticale under low and high inputs $ 9,978 Managing post‐anthesis applications of Nitrogen to reduce “leaf burn” and improve the yield/protein response of wheat $ 6,370 Starter fertilizer improves alfalfa strand establishment and forage yield $ 4,200 Test weight stability of
    [Show full text]