Old Colony Railroad Rehabilitation Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Old Colony Railroad Rehabilitation Project Old Colony Railroad Rehabilitation Project By: Robert J. Frascella, P.E. Project Manager Sverdrup Civil, Inc. Two Center Plaza Boston, MA 02108 Phone: (617) 742-8060 Fax: (617) 74241830 ABSTRACT OLD COLONY RAILROAD REHABILITATION Southeastern Massachusetts Sverdrup Civil, Inc. provided all engineering and construction phase services to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority for the reconstruction of three branch lines of the Old Colony Railroad. The Old Colony Railroad serves 600,000 residents in more than 30 communities in the fastest growing part of the state, helping to relieve severe traffic congestion on area roadways. The Main, Middleborough, and Plymouth Lines of the Old Colony Railroad have been totally reconstructed and now offer direct service to Boston's South Station Intermodal Transportation Center for more than 10,000 inbound riders per day with trip times of under one hour. Restoring service required the design and construction of 99.8 km (62 route miles) of railroad; 488 m (1,600) feet of cut-and-cover tunnels; 15 commuter rail stations; two train layover facilities; a centrally-located maintenance facility; 44 grade crossings; 11 passing sidings; improvements to 18 roadway intersections; a system wide signal and communications system; and the construction or rehabilitation of 47 bridges. The Old Colony Railroad, which maintained rail traffic throughout construction, was designed for joint use by commuter and freight trains. This presentation focuses on the challenging and difficult issues associated with constructing a modern commuter rail transportation system in an urban, suburban, and rural environment. KEYWORDS: Commuter Rail Railroad Rehabilitation New Service Joint Use Massachusetts INTRODUCTION For more than thirty years, Southeastern Massachusetts has been plagued with severe traffic congestion because that region of the State lacked a viable commuting alternative to the passenger automobile. The focus of this presentation is two-fold. First, it will present the history, planning and development of restored commuter rail service to this region. Second, it will highlight some of the engineering challenges that the designers and builders faced in bringing this once thriving railroad back to life. Since the start of revenue service in September 1997, more than 8,000 automobiles per day have been eliminated from area highways, traffic conditions have greatly improved and air quality has become more acceptable. This has all become possible due to the rehabilitation of the Old Colony Railroad. HISTORY The Old Colony Railroad was originally constructed in the mid-nineteenth century to satisfy the transportation needs of eastern Massachusetts. By 1845, rail service on the Old Colony lines had been extended to most of southeastern Massachusetts and portions of Rhode Island- In 1893, the Old Colony Railroad became a part of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad through a lease arrangement. Under New Haven management, The Old Colony lines survived for many years as the primary means for commuters to access Downtown Boston from the southern suburbs. During the post-World War II years, the Old Colony commuter lines became a financial burden for the New Haven Railroad which sought for many years to abandon the passenger service on the branch lines serving Plymouth, Middleborough and Scituate, MA. Increased use of the passenger automobile and new highway construction meant decreased ridership on the former Old Colony Lines serving the southeast region of the Commonwealth. In 1959, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts completed construction of the Southeast Expressway, a major arterial highway from Boston to Cape Cod. Concurrently, the State railroad subsidy was discontinued. This made automobile access to Boston easier and forced the New Haven Railroad to further reduce service on the Old Colony Lines. Shortly after the Southeast Expressway opened in 1960, the Old Colony drawbridge across the Neponset River was destroyed by fire. Through train movements were no longer possible between Boston and South Shore communities. Freight service continued uninterrupted on the Old Colony Lines after the bridge was destroyed from existing connections via Attleborough, MA and South Boston. As such, the New Haven had no interest in replacing the damaged structure. Commuter service was permanently halted on the former Old Colony Lines and many Boston commuters were left with few alternatives to the automobile. In 1984, the Massachusetts Legislature allocated funds to enable the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) to study the restoration of commuter rail service to southeastern Massachusetts. A feasibility study was undertaken by Sverdrup Civil, Inc. to determine whether sufficient ridership would support reconstruction of the Middleborough, Plymouth and Greenbush Lines of the Old Colony Railroad. The initial study concluded that ridership would support restoration of commuter rail service in this region. The study recommended a number of alternatives worthy of consideration. In 1986, the Governor and the State Legislature directed the MBTA to proceed with environmental studies in support of the restoration of the Old Colony Railroad to full commuter rail service. The environmental studies recognized several other benefits to the restoration of commuter rail service. A reduction in vehicles on the area roadways would improve air quality within the region. Also, improved commuter rail service would provide valuable mitigation to the planned Central Artery Project, a major highway construction project currently underway in downtown Boston. As part of the environmental review process, a Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statement/Report (EIS/R) was prepared for the Main, Middleborough and Plymouth Lines. Following a six-year public review process involving legislators, federal and state agencies, town governments, and the general public, the environmental assessment was completed by the end of March 1992. The Massachusetts Secretary of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs (EOEA) issued the final state approval in May of 1992. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued its Record of Decision (ROD) in June of 1992 clearing the way for design and construction of the Middleborough and Plymouth Lines of the Old Colony Railroad. The Greenbush Line was excluded from the ROD because of public opposition in the Town of Hingham with regard to impacts on historic resources. A supplemental EIS/R was prepared separately for the Greenbush Line addressing these issues and preliminary design on this branchline is now underway. DESIGN OF THE RECONSTRUCTION BEGINS Immediately following the ROD, the design phase of the Old Colony Rehabilitation began. The project, as conceived, involved the reconstruction of 99.8 Ian (62-route miles) of track; construction of 14 new commuter rail stations; rehabilitation or replacement of 42 bridges; improvements to 54 grade crossings; construction of two train layover facilities; construction of 2.9 Ian (1.8 miles) of track on new alignment; construction of 1,067 m (3,500 ft.) of new double-track tunnel section under a limited access highway and a highway interchange; replacement of the Neponset River drawbridge with a 363 m (1,190 ft.) double-track, fixed-span structure; a maintenance of way facility; a new signal system; and other amenities required to develop a modem, functional passenger transportation system. An aggressive schedule for design and construction was undertaken. The start of revenue service date was fixed at December 31, 1996. This left four short years to complete design, construction and stall-up activities. In addition, it was decided to divide the construction into several smaller contracts to provide more opportunities for smaller contractors and to allow the construction to be staged to permit early activities to proceed unabated. Long lead items were procured separately by the MBTA for installation by the primary contractors. Such items as rail, crossties, fasteners and turnouts were ordered at an early date to avoid delays during construction. By the time construction was complete, more that thirty construction contracts were awarded to more than 25 different contractors with a total construction cost of $537-Million. CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW OLD COLONY RAILROAD The first 17.7 kin, (11 miles) of the New Old Colony Railroad was constructed immediately adjacent to the MBTA's Red Line rapid transit system. The Red Line system was constructed in the 1970's within the former Old Colony railroad right-of-way. The Red Line designers had the foresight to reserve an additional trackway within the corridor for future transportation purposes. Had this not occurred, rehabilitation of the Old Colony as a commuter rail system would not have been possible. Though this advanced planning facilitated the development of the Old Colony Commuter Railroad, it was not an easy effort. The reserved trackway meant that only a single-track railroad with one passing siding could be developed for the first 11 miles. And, the trackway, which was originally reserved for rapid transit purposes, did not have adequate clearances for commuter rail equipment without significant reconstruction. The rehabilitated portion of the Old Colony Railroad began just south of Boston's South Station (Milepost 0.0) at Milepost 1.1 at a location known as South Bay. The first major obstacle was encountered at this location. A double-track embankment supporting the Red Line access to Cabot Yard
Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT
    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
    [Show full text]
  • General Notice Letter (Gnl) Response
    RUBIN AND RUDMAN LLP COUNSELLORS AT LAW 50 ROWES WHARF • BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110-3319 TELEPHONE: (6i7)330-7000 • FACSIMILE: (617)4-39-9556 • EMAIL: [email protected] Margaret Van Deusen Direct Dial: (617) 330-7154 E-mail: [email protected] June 26, 2000 BY MESSENGER Richard Haworth United States Environmental Protection Agency Site Evaluation and Response Section II 1 Congress Street Suite 1100 Mail Code HBR Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2023 Re: EPA Notice Letter, Old Colony Railroad Site, East Bridgewater, MA Dear Mr. Haworth: This firm is counsel to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority ("MBTA") with respect to the above matter. By letter dated June 5, 2000, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") notified the MBTA of its potential liability regarding the Old Colony Railroad Site in East Bridgewater, MA ("Site") pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). The letter also informed the MBTA that EPA plans to conduct immediate removal activities involving installation of a perimeter fence, elimination of direct contact with contaminated soils and prevention of off-site migration via soil transport. EPA is asking the MBTA to perform or to finance these activities. Pursuant to conversations with Marcia Lamel, Senior Enforcement Counsel, EPA, the MBTA was given until today to respond to EPA's letter. As discussed below, even though the MBTA does not believe that it is a responsible party at this Site, it is willing to participate in fencing the perimeter of the Site and posting signage. The MBTA is also willing to discuss with EPA covering "hot spots" of contaminated soil on the Site with some sort of synthetic cover.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Kendall Square
    Ridership and Service Statistics Thirteenth Edition 2010 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile July 2010 MBTA Service District Cities and Towns 175 Size in Square Miles 3,244 Population (2000 Census) 4,663,565 Typical Weekday Ridership (FY 2010) By Line Unlinked Red Line 241,603 Orange Line 184,961 Blue Line 57,273 Total Heavy Rail 483,837 Total Green Line (Light Rail & Trolley) 236,096 Bus (includes Silver Line) 361,676 Silver Line SL1 & SL2* 14,940 Silver Line SL4 & SL5** 15,086 Trackless Trolley 12,364 Total Bus and Trackless Trolley 374,040 TOTAL MBTA-Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 System Unlinked MBTA - Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 Commuter Rail Boardings (Inbound + Outbound) 132,720 Contracted Bus 2,603 Water Transportation 4,372 THE RIDE Paratransit Trips Delivered 6,773 TOTAL ALL MODES UNLINKED 1,240,441 Notes: Unlinked trips are the number of passengers who board public transportation vehicles. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. * Average weekday ridership taken from 2009 CTPS surveys for Silver Line SL1 & SL2. ** SL4 service began in October 2009. Ridership represents a partial year of operation. File: CH 01 p02-7 - MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile Jul10 1 Annual Ridership (FY 2010) Unlinked Trips by Mode Heavy Rail - Red Line 74,445,042 Total Heavy Rail - Orange Line 54,596,634 Heavy Rail Heavy Rail - Blue Line 17,876,009 146,917,685 Light Rail (includes Mattapan-Ashmont Trolley) 75,916,005 Bus (includes Silver Line) 108,088,300 Total Rubber Tire Trackless Trolley 3,438,160 111,526,460 TOTAL Subway & Bus/Trackless Trolley 334,360,150 Commuter Rail 36,930,089 THE RIDE Paratransit 2,095,932 Ferry (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • January 20, 2020 Volume 40 Number 1
    JANUARY 20, 2020 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 40 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 1 13 The Semaphore 17 David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Boston Globe & Wall Street Journal Reporters Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Western Massachusetts………………………. Ron Clough 24 Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart Mid-Atlantic News……………………………. Doug Buchanan PRODUCTION STAFF Publication…………….………………… …. … Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Bryan Miller Web Page …………………..……………….… Savery Moore Club Photographer………………………….…. Joe Dumas Guest Contributors………………………………Peter Palica, Kevin Linagen The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2019 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 40 ■■■■■ NUMBER 1 ■■■■■ JANUARY 2020 CLUB OFFICERS President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Treasurer………………....Will Baker BILL OF LADING Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Chief’s Corner...... ……. .. .3 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’20) Contests ............... ……..….3 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘20) Clinic……………….…...…3 ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’21) …………………………...Gary Mangelinkx (‘21) Editor’s Notes. …...........…..8 Form 19 Calendar………….3 Members .............. …….......8 Memories ............. ………...3 Potpourri .............. ..…..…...5 ON THE COVER: New Haven I-5 #1408 pulling the westbound “Yankee Clipper” passes the Running Extra ...... .….….…8 Sharon, MA station.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenbush Line
    GREENBUSH LINE Keep in Mind SW* - Severe Weather trains This schedule will be effective from December 14 2015, and Monday to Friday will replace the schedule of December 27, 2014. Inbound to Boston AM PM Holiday Service: SW* SW* Saturday service: Presidents’ Day, 4th of July. ZONE STATION TRAIN # 070 072 074 076 078 080 082 084 086 088 090 092 Bikes Allowed Sunday service: New Year’s Day, Memorial Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day. 6 Greenbush 5:40 6:37 7:03 7:50 8:50 10:35 11:50 2:11 3:47 5:20 7:05 8:10 All other holidays: For other holiday schedules, please check 5 North Scituate 5:47 6:44 7:10 7:57 8:57 10:42 11:57 2:18 3:54 5:27 7:12 8:17 MBTA.com or call 617-222-3200. 4 Cohasset 5:54 6:51 7:17 8:04 9:04 10:48 12:04 2:25 4:01 5:38 7:22 8:23 Times in purple with “f” indicate a flag stop: Passengers 4 Nantasket Junction 5:58 6:55 7:21 8:08 9:08 10:51 12:08 2:28 4:04 5:42 7:26 8:26 must tell the conductor that they wish to leave. Passengers waiting to board must be visible on the platform for the 3 West Hingham 6:03 7:00 7:26 8:13 9:13 10:56 12:13 2:33 4:09 5:47 7:31 8:31 train to stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Concord, MA
    Technical Memorandum Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Concord, MA Cultural Resources Survey January 10, 2008 Submitted to: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 530 Broadway Providence, Rhode Island 02909 Introduction The Town of Concord, Massachusetts has contracted with Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) for professional design and engineering services for a non-motorized multi-use recreational path/rail trail over the 3.5 mile section of the proposed Bruce Freeman Rail Trail from the southerly side of Route 2 south to the Sudbury town line (Figure 1). The design and engineering services include a survey and documentation of the historic resources along the proposed trail alignment. PAL entered into a Subconsultant Contract with VHB for the historic resources survey and documentation. The survey’s purpose is to identify historic railroad-related resources along the rail corridor, to document these resources in writing and with photographs, and to provide recommendations for incorporating existing railroad infrastructure in and creating educational opportunities along the rail corridor. This technical memorandum describes the field and research methodologies employed by PAL in conducting fieldwork and archival research, presents the results of the field survey, and provides recommendations for the integration of railroad-related resources into the landscape design and interpretive programming elements of the finished rail trail. Methodology PAL employees John Daly (industrial historian) and Quinn Stuart (architectural assistant) completed a site walk of the 3.5-mile proposed rail trail corridor on August 23, 2007. Prior to the site walk, PAL employees met representatives of the Town of Concord to discuss priorities for the survey. Valarie Kinkade of the Concord Historical Commission, Ashley Galvin of the Concord Historic District Commission, and Henry T.
    [Show full text]
  • Invests$'Jlom Into Restoring Railroadservice
    Paga46 • August2015 26, • www.oonotructlonoquipmenlgUlcle.com • CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMEriTGUIIE � Invests$'JlOM Into Restoring Railroad Service ByJay Adams problems. While the Commonwealth of CEO CORRESPONDENT Cardi Corp. crews work 011 rat/over Massachusetts provided an emergency sub­ PresidentAve1n1e tn FaU Rive,: sidy to continue service to tl1e Soud1 Coast in A long-dead mode of transportation is 1958, it was not enough. Passenger service coming back to life in several cities in on the Old Colony line was abandooed in Massachusetts.. 1959, with the exception of the main line Months of summer work have begun to between Boston and Providence,R.l. repair vital rail bridgesin the FallRiver area, The currentone-year phase of lhe project partof the 120-month South Coast Rail proj­ is seeingrailways shoredup forthe firsttime ect d1at is restoring52 mi. (83.6 km)of com­ in 56 years. muter rail service between Boston and lhe With the first year design phase complete. Massachusetts South Coast. The entirecost involving state discussions with communi­ of die decade-long plan is estimated to be tiesfrom Stoughton to FallRiver. tons of soil $2l0million. samples are being taken over many months "We are thrilled about the three Fall River to discerntoxic conte111 and other vital infor­ bridges and the Warnsutta Bridge in New mation. When the design phase is complete Bedford. These are solid investments that and the samples in hand, MassDOT will will provide immediate benefit to the begin replacing four bridges - New expanding freightrail sector. along the same Bedford's Wan�utta Bridge. Fall River's route as lhe future South Coast Rail com­ Golf Club Road.
    [Show full text]
  • FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
    FULLTIME FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study FINAL REPORT September 1, 2010 Prepared For: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority With Support From: Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development Prepared By: Jacobs Engineering Group, Boston, MA With: Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston , MA Anne S. Gailbraith, AICP Barrington, RI 1 REPORT NAME: Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study PROJECT NUMBER: A92PS03, Task Order No. 2 PREPARED FOR: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) PREPARED BY: Jacobs Engineering Group Anne S. Galbraith Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) DATE: September 1, 2010 FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1: IDENTIFY KEY ISSUES AND PROJECT APPROACH .................................................... 13 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Key Issues....................................................................................................................... 17 1.3 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2: ANALYZE THE CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving South Boston Rail Corridor Katerina Boukin
    Improving South Boston Rail Corridor by Katerina Boukin B.Sc, Civil and Environmental Engineering Technion Institute of Technology ,2015 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2020 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author........................................................................... Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 19, 2020 Certified by. Andrew J. Whittle Professor Thesis Supervisor Certified by. Frederick P. Salvucci Research Associate, Center for Transportation and Logistics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by...................................................................... Colette L. Heald, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chair, Graduate Program Committee 2 Improving South Boston Rail Corridor by Katerina Boukin Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 19, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering Abstract . Rail services in older cities such as Boston include an urban metro system with a mixture of light rail/trolley and heavy rail lines, and a network of commuter services emanating from termini in the city center. These legacy systems have grown incrementally over the past century and are struggling to serve the economic and population growth
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Fixes Will Disrupt Rail Lines T to Spend $91.5M to Repair Crumbling Old Colony Ties
    Urgent fixes will disrupt rail lines T to spend $91.5m to repair crumbling Old Colony ties By Eric Moskowitz Globe Staff / April 28, 2010 Text size – + Thousands of concrete ties that hold the rails together on Old Colony commuter rail lines are unexpectedly crumbling, forcing the MBTA to invest $91.5 million in emergency replacements. That work will cause delays and disruptions for thousands of riders between Boston and its southern suburbs. The weakening of the ties, which were supposed to last for decades more, has already forced the T to impose speed restrictions that have slowed travel time for travelers on two Old Colony branches, to Plymouth/Kingston and Middleborough/Lakeville. The repair project, which is expected to last nearly two years, will require the T to cancel all weekend service on those branches and to replace midday rail service with buses. The T says the repairs will not affect rush-hour service. “The governor’s not happy about this, the [transportation] secretary’s not happy, and neither am I,’’ said Richard A. Davey Jr., general manager of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. “But we need to deal with this problem.’’ Commuters are also unhappy, citing delays on the Old Colony lines, where only 15 percent of the trains on the Middleborough branch ran on time in December, prompting the T to rewrite its schedules to acknowledge longer travel times. “It’s usually between 15 and 30 minutes behind schedule,’’ said Michael Whitcher, 29, who was waiting for his wife last night at Braintree Station. “It would be nice if they could get their act together and get the trains running on time.’’ The Old Colony Plymouth and Middlebourgh lines currently serve 56,000 riders a week, according to the T.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor New York to Philadelphia
    Northeast Corridor New York to Philadelphia 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................2 2 A HISTORY..............................................................................................3 3 ROLLING STOCK......................................................................................4 3.1 EMD AEM-7 Electric Locomotive .......................................................................................4 3.2 Amtrak Amfleet Coaches .................................................................................................5 4 SCENARIOS.............................................................................................6 4.1 Go Newark....................................................................................................................6 4.2 New Jersey Trenton .......................................................................................................6 4.3 Spirit or Transportation ..................................................................................................6 4.4 The Big Apple................................................................................................................6 4.5 Early Clocker.................................................................................................................7 4.6 Evening Clocker.............................................................................................................7 4.7 Northeast Regional ........................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Metal for LOCOMOTIVE WEARING PARTS
    AUGUST, 1909 .~;, Railroad - Dep~rtm(n-l ,. .: ~:- .· , . y. JV\. (. A. , .. BUILDERS' HARDWARE ABSOLUTELY EUROPEAN FIREF;tOOF TH£ PLAN ~o't'EL Ess~~ For every need and of the highest BOSTON quality in every class New Britain, Conn. DIRECTLY OPPOSITE THE SOUTH STATION CONVENIENT TO BUSINESSCENTii:RB AND RUBLIC INSTITUTIONS ACCOMMODATIONS, CATERING AND OUR HOME DOOR CHECK SERVICE UNSURPASSED is the only appliance of its kind that with­ WRITE FOR BOOKLET. stands the hard use of railway service. 1-- ~ - ' . PINT~Cn LltiHT (LfCTRIC LltiHT Car Lighting by the PINT~cn Axle Driven Dqnomo~y~tem ~ \'~ Tf)1 with perfected -;iO­ of electric lighting. l:quip­ gle mantle lamp~. ment~ either ~old or oper­ Co~t-Ooe cent per hour. ated under contract. , ~T(A~ HfAT Car Heating by controllable direct steam and water circulating systems, steam tight couplers, traps, train pipe valves and other appliances. Thermo- Jet System where pressure is not desired. , SAF.ETY CAR HEATING & LIGHTING COMPANY,.. 2 RECTOR STREET, NEW YORK ,- Chicago Philadelphia St. Louis Boston Berkeley, Cal. Atlanta Montreal I T - ' 1Rew lJlorlit 1Rew lba"en anb lbartforb 1Railroab 1Rews. VoL. XII NEW HAVEN, CONN., AUGUST, 1909 No. 10 Train Service To_ The Boats. Brockton) anrl :\liddleboro to the "new road" (just completed under title of Dighton & "Old Colony Passenger Station. Fall River Line to New York" was the way the big signs Somerset) through Randolph and Taunton. used to read which hung for years on either The following in regard to the steamboat train over the "new road" and a description side of the Old Colony Depot at the corner of the towns through which it passed is taken of South and Kneeland streets in Boston.
    [Show full text]