Energy label end eco-design: the views of household appliance manufacturers.
Monitoring of EU and national energy efficiency targets Ljubljana 31.3/1.4.2011 CECED Membership
National Associations 15 Direct Members in 24 countries
Arçelik Ariston Thermo Group Bosch Siemens Candy Daikin De’ Longhi Electrolux Fagor - FagorBrandt Gorenje Indesit Company Liebherr Miele Philips Seb Whirlpool
2 Energy efficiency and label: a long success story
100 D EEI 66% improvement of the fleet sales 90 C 60% of best technology
80 70 B B 60 A 50 A average best 40 A+
30 A++
20 A+++ 10 0 1992 2010
Ljubljana 31/3/2011 3 Is energy efficiency sufficient to deliver savings?
The answer is easy and simple: NO.
Energy efficiency (and labelling) alone cannot deliver the expected savings in acceptable timeframe. A large share of installed stock in use is very old and energy inefficient Consumer expectations for more welfare
Forgo Morgo campaign in Hungary 2006-2008: Oldest fridge in operation Zil Moszkva, 1956 Oldest WM AEG 1951 Oldest electric cooker from the 30’s
Ljubljana 31/3/2011 4 Penetration of super efficient products varies
100% % of fridge/freezers in 90% energy classes 80% offered in some retailers 70% web pages. 60% A 50% 40% A+ 30% A++ 20% 10% 0% British Belgian French Italian Spanish German Polish retailer retailer retailer retailer retailer retailer retailer
Ljubljana 31/3/2011 5 A huge gap needs to be filled up
Energy Label pulls technology to place on the market A+++ refrigerators and competition pushes to go beyond.
At the same time the market is moving at a slower pace.
For each average A+ fridge sold instead of an A+++ there is an energy waste of 1.4 MWh over ten years.
The gap between technology potential and market represents an energy waste up to 20 TWh in 10 years.
ThisProper is likepolicies mortgaging need to be developed to support the uptake of state-ofour-the future-art technology.
Ljubljana 31/3/2011 6 Looking forward to 2020
At current pace 20% energy saving target by 2020 will not be achieved (ref. Council and Commission documents).
CECED opinion: Enhance focus on eco-design implementing measures – Too slow process; risk of vanifying all efforts done so far; – Overlapping of ecodesign framework revision with resource sustainability intiatives. Develop ambitious polices to finance energy efficiency investments for households and business – Utilities obligations – Revision of energy market rules Revision of Energy Service Directive, with mandatory energy saving targets for Member States.
Ljubljana 31/3/2011 7 A shared concern
Household appliance The Architects’ Council of Europe (ACE) Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE) manufacturers concerns are shared ClientEarth Climate Action Network – Europe (CAN-Europe) The Climate Group by a wide area of environmental, COGEN Europe European Alliance of Companies for Energy Efficiency in societal NGOs, professional and Buildings (EuroACE) European Alliance to Save Energy (EU-ASE) European Association of Polyurethane Insulation Manufacturers industrial organisations. (PU Europe) European Climate Foundation European Committee of Domestic Equipment Manufacturers (CECED) European Copper Institute European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (eceee) European Environmental Bureau (EEB) European Insulation Manufacturers Association (Eurima) European Lamp Companies Federation (ELCF) European Liaison Committee For Social Housing (CECODHAS) Friends of the Earth Europe Glass for Europe Prince of Wales's EU Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change (EU CLG) Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) WWF
Ljubljana 31/3/2011 8 THANK YOU
Luigi Meli www.ceced.eu [email protected]