DOCSLIB.ORG

Rochford DC Base Years Projected Flows 2000 2001 2002 2004 1.04 1.03 1.02 2005 1.05 1.04 1.03 2010 1.09 1.08 1.07

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rochford DC Base Years Projected Flows 2000 2001 2002 2004 1.04 1.03 1.02 2005 1.05 1.04 1.03 2010 1.09 1.08 1.07 Rochford District Council Local Air Quality Management – Updating and Screening Assessment Ref: CS/AQ/022720103/2087 October 2003 DOCUMENT INFORMATION AND CONTROL SHEET Client Rochford District Council Project Manager Joanne Ellis Council Offices Tel: 01702 318045 South Street Fax: 01702 545737 Rochford SS4 1BW Environmental Consultant Casella Stanger Project Manager Richard Maggs Great Guildford House Tel: 0207 902 6149 30 Great Guildford Street Fax: 0207 902 6158 London SE1 0ES Project Team Giuliano Gianforte Principal Author Giuliano Gianforte Lucy Parkin Sharon Atkins Richard Maggs Document Status and Approval Schedule IStatus Description Prepared by: Reviewed by: s Sharon Atkins Richard Maggs s Senior Consultant Principal Consultant u e Signed/Dated Signed/Dated Draft Issued to client Report Final Issued to client Report Ref: CS/AQ/022720103/2087 Rochford District Council LAQM USA October 2003 CONTENTS Page 1 Executive Summary 1 2 Introduction 3 2.1 Project Background 3 2.2 Legislative Background 3 2.3 Scope of USA 3 2.4 Assessment Criteria 5 2.5 Reporting of USA 6 3 Local background concentrations 7 4 Monitoring Data 10 4.1 Benzene 10 4.2 1, 3-Butadiene 10 4.3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 11 4.4 Lead 11 4.5 Nitrogen Dioxide 12 4.7 PM10 14 4.6 Sulphur Dioxide 15 5 Industrial Sources 16 5.1 Part A Processes 16 5.2 Part B Processes 19 5.3 Petrol Stations 22 5.4 Major Fuel Storage Depots 24 5.5 Areas of Domestic Coal Burning 24 5.6 Shipping 24 5.7 Railways 24 5.8 Airports 24 5.9 Other Sources 24 6 Road Traffic Sources 26 6.1 Introduction 27 6.2 Methodology 30 6.3 Main Roads (excluding junctions) 31 6.4 Significant Junctions 34 6.5 Other Road Traffic Sources 39 7 Areas with Combined Impacts 39 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 40 Ref: CS/AQ/022720103/2087 Page i Rochford District Council LAQM USA October 2003 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 places a statutory duty on local authorities to review and assess the air quality within their area and take account of Government Guidance when undertaking such work. Between 1998 and 2001, following the introduction of the National Air Quality Strategy and Air Quality Regulations, Rochford District Council (RDC) undertook its First Round of review and assessments of air quality. The First Round assessments (Stages 1, 2 and 3) concluded that it is road traffic emissions from vehicles on the A127 Southend Arterial Road and A130 Chelmsford Road that are the main issues with respect to local air quality but that it was not necessary to declare any Air Quality Management Areas (AQMA) for any pollutant. The updating and screening assessment (USA) provides an update with respect to air quality issues within RDC. Specifically, there have been a number of changes since the last round of review and assessments, which have been taken into account in this assessment. These include: a revised National Air Quality Strategy (2000) and Addendum (2003); new Air Quality Regulations (2000 and 2002); new guidance documents LAQM.PG (03) and LAQM.TG (03); and, revised vehicle emissions factors (2002). The USA has included consideration of new emissions sources, in addition to all existing emission sources previously identified in the First Round and any possible changes to them thereof. The USA considers the seven priority health based air quality objectives as laid down in Regulations and assesses the likelihood that the air quality objectives will be met by their target dates. If the air quality objectives are unlikely to be met, a detailed assessment will be required. It also considers the provisional PM10 objectives for 2010, although no detailed assessment of the 2010 PM10 objectives is required at this stage, as the objectives have not been laid down in Regulations. Having considered each pollutant and presented evidence to support the assessment of each, it is concluded that the air quality objectives for benzene, 1, 3-butadiene, carbon monoxide, lead, PM10 (2004 annual mean) and sulphur dioxide will be met. There will be no requirement to undertake a detailed assessment for these pollutants. The results of the screening assessment have shown that a detailed assessment is required to assess the PM10 24 hour objective at residential properties in close proximity to the Rawreth Industrial Estate where there are a number of fugitive PM10 emission sources. The provisional annual PM10 objective for 2010 is predicted to be exceeded at all busy roads and junctions assessed due to the high modelled background PM10 for 2010. This will require further assessment in future air quality assessments once included in Regulations. It is recommended that RDC undertake a monitoring programme for NO2 and PM10 to confirm the findings of this report. With respect to NO2, it is recommended that RDC Ref: CS/AQ/022720103/2087 Page 1 Rochford District Council LAQM USA October 2003 undertake a monitoring programme at the nearest receptor to the busy A130 and at the High Street/Eastwood Road Junction in Rayleigh, where the annual mean NO2 objective were predicted as marginally being met. With respect to PM10, it is recommended that monitoring of fugitive dust emissions from the Rawreth Industrial Estate be undertaken. Summary Table Detailed assessment Objectives required? Sources/Location Benzene No - 1, 3 - butadiene No - Carbon monoxide No - Lead No - Nitrogen dioxide No - Yes, 24 hour Rawreth Industrial PM 10 mean objective Estate Sulphur dioxide No - Ref: CS/AQ/022720103/2087 Page 2 Rochford District Council LAQM USA October 2003 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Project Background Casella Stanger was commissioned by Rochford District Council (RDC), one of thirteen local authorities in the Essex Air Quality Consortium, to carry out an Updating and Screening Assessment (USA) of air pollution sources that may affect local air quality within the area. The USA is required to be undertaken as part of the local authority‟s statutory duties as defined within Part IV of the Environment Act 1995. RDC undertook their First Round of review and assessment, including Stage 1, 2 and 3 reports, during 1998 – 2001. The First Round predicted that the air quality objectives should be met by their target dates. The main issues with respect to local air quality were found to be road traffic emissions (NO2 and PM10) emanating from vehicles on the A127 Southend Arterial Road and A130 Chelmsford Road, but it was not necessary to declare any Air Quality Management Areas (AQMA) for any pollutant. 2.2 Legislative Background Part IV of the Environment Act, 1995, places a statutory duty on local authorities to periodically review and assess the air quality within their area. This involves consideration of present and likely future air quality against air quality standards and objectives. Guidelines for the „Review and Assessment‟ of local air quality were published in the 1997 National Air Quality Strategy (NAQS) 1 and associated guidance and technical guidance. In 2000, Government reviewed the NAQS and set down a revised Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland2 (AQS). This set down a revised framework for air quality standards and objectives for seven pollutants, which were subsequently set in Regulation in 2000 through the Air Quality Regulations 20003. These were subsequently amended in 20024. More recently, (February 2003), Government published its Addendum to the AQS which proposed new objectives for PM10 in 2010 whilst also setting down new objectives for benzene and carbon monoxide. New Technical Guidance (LAQM.TG(03))5 and Policy Guidance (LAQM.PG(03))6 were issued on behalf of DEFRA in January 2003. This guidance sets the framework for the requirements of review and assessment for future years, taking account of experiences from the previous rounds of review and assessment. 2.3 Scope of USA The USA should be used to identify those matters that have changed since the First Round of review and assessment and to identify those sources that may lead to an air quality objective being exceeded. A series of checklist for pollutants, and different screening tools for industrial and road traffic sources may be used in order determine 1 DoE (1997) The United Kingdom Nation Air Quality Strategy The Stationery Office 2 DETR (2000) The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland – Working together for Clean Air, The Stationery Office 3 DETR (2000) The Air Quality Regulations 2000, The Stationery Office 4 Defra (2002) The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland: Addendum, The Stationery Office 5 Defra (2003) Technical Guidance LAQM.TG(03), Part IV of the Environment Act 1995, Local Air Quality Management, The Stationery Office 6 Defra (2003) Policy Guidance LAQM.PG(03), Part IV of the Environment Act 1995, Local Air Quality Management, The Stationery Office Ref: CS/AQ/022720103/2087 Page 3 Rochford District Council LAQM USA October 2003 those remaining sources that may have significant contributions to potential exceedences of the air quality objectives. The USA should if possible determine what has changed since that last round of review and assessment, but where the information from the last round is not clear, or new information has become available, an additional screening of sources for significance can be carried out. In many cases it may also have been 3 years since information on sources was last collated and this could therefore be out of date. It is important to recognise that during previous assessments, information such as road traffic data may only have been collated for those roads considered to be important at the time of the previous assessments, and in relation to the risk of exceedence of objectives set at the time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Deliverable 3
    REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Contract: GMA2-2001-52011 Funded by European Commission – DG TREN Fifth Framework Programme Competitive and Sustainable Growth Programme Key Action 2 – Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Deliverable 3 Case Studies Specification Version 2.0 Date: 9th March 2005 Authors: S. Suter and U. Springer (ECOPLAN), A. de Palma and R. Lindsey (adpC), S. van der Loo (KULeuven), A. Ricci and P. Fagiani (ISIS), P. Moilanen (STRAFICA), M. van der Hoofd and M. Carmona (TIS), J. Baker (TTR) with contributions from partners Project co-ordinator: ISIS (Italy) Partners: ISIS (It), ADPC (Be), CERAS (Fr), DIW (De), ECOPLAN (Ch), INFRAS (Ch), ITS (UK), IWW (De), KULeuven (Be), LETS (Fr), NEA (Nl), PW (Pl), STRAFICA (Fi), TIS (Pt), TOI (No), TTR (UK) REVENUE D3 CASE STUDIES SPECIFICATION Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Deliverable 3: Case Studies Specification Date: 9th March 2005 Authors: S. Suter and U. Springer (ECOPLAN), A. de Palma and R. Lindsey (adpC), S. van der Loo (KULeuven), A. Ricci and P. Fagiani (ISIS), P. Moilanen (STRAFICA), M. van der Hoofd and M. Carmona (TIS), J. Baker (TTR) This document should be referenced as: S. Suter, U. Springer, A. de Palma, R. Lindsey, S. van der Loo, A. Ricci, P. Fagiani, P. Moilanen, M. van der Hoofd, M. Carmona and J. Baker, (2004), Case Studies Specification, REVENUE Project Deliverable 3. Funded by 5th Framework RTD Programme, ISIS, Rome, 9th March 2005 PROJECT INFORMATION Contract: GMA2-2001-52011 Website: http://www.revenue-eu.org/ Commissioned by: European Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • East Basildon High Level Development Framework
    Basildon HLDFs East Basildon Development Framework 27/09/2017 Pell Frischmann East Basildon Development Framework 27/09/2017 High Level Development Framework REVISION RECORD Report Ref: A13304/VAA EAST BASILDON HLDF Rev Description Date Originator Checked Approved 0 Draft Report 30/03/2017 H Rowlinson S Hooley A Twyford 1 Final Report 30/06/2017 H Rowlinson S Hooley A Twyford 2 Final Report REV A 14/07/2017 H Rowlinson S Hooley A Twyford 3 Final Report + Addendum 27/09/2017 S Hooley A Twyford S Hooley This report is to be regarded as confidential to our Client and it is intended for their use only and may not be assigned. Consequently and in accordance with current practice, any liability to any third party in respect of the whole or any part of its contents is hereby expressly excluded. Before the report or any part of it is reproduced or referred to in any document, circular or statement and before its contents or the contents of any part of it are disclosed orally to any third party, our written approval as to the form and context of such a publication or disclosure must be obtained Prepared for: Prepared by: Basildon Borough Council Pell Frischmann The Basildon Centre 5 Manchester Square St. Martin’s Square London Basildon, Essex, SS14 1DL 1 East Basildon Development Framework 27/09/2017 High Level Development Framework CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1 BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Railways of the Blackwater and Crouch Estuaries 2011
    THE RAILWAYS OF THE BLACKWATER AND CROUCH ESTUARIES The Shenfield to Southminster branch. A History and Field Survey of the Extant Structures Contributors: James Kemble and Adam Garwood . Essex County Council, 2011. 1 2 Contents. Summary Page 5 Introduction 5 Compendium of Structures 5 General Survey 9 Grading 9 The Shenfield to Southminster branch via Woodham Ferrers Brief History 11 Description of the Extant Structures 15 Recommendations 115 Bibliography 117 Maps 118 Cover photo: Althorne level crossing and railway cottage. Maps © and database Crown copyright & Landmark Information Group All rights reserved. May 2011. 3 4 SUMMARY. This Report presents the results of the field survey of the operating railway line between Shenfield and Southminster. A companion Report is published for the two now-discontinued railway branches from Witham to Maldon, and from Woodham Ferrers to Maldon. Fieldwork was carried out between April and August 2007. The purpose of the Survey was to detail what survives of the structures of these lines and their accompanying works including buildings, bridges, embankments, cuttings and subsiduary constructions, to review the statutory designations and to suggest possible further usage for the lines. INTRODUCTION. Much of the track line and adjacent land of the two discontinued lines is in private or corporate ownership and is publicly accessible only where it is crossed by public roads and paths. Small parts have been developed by Local Councils as “Trails” as a public amenity. There are two Nature Reserves. Where building development has been permitted on the former track, some recognition of the former alignment is still recognisable by the line of streets, footpaths and land/property boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements 1625H19H18H18H19H19H
    Essex County Council Annual Financial Report 2011/12 abc Contents Essex County Council’s Annual Financial Report for 2011/12 is divided into several distinct sections, as follows: Section Content Page One Explanatory Foreword 14H4H4H4H Two Statement of Accounts 95H5H5H5H Three Annual Governance Statement 1926H6H6H6H Four Independent Auditor’s Report 2087H7H7H7H Section One Explanatory Foreword Section One ‐ Explanatory Foreword 1. Introduction Through careful financial planning and control, at the end of 2011/12 Essex County Council’s finances remain robust. The budget for 2011/12 was set against a backdrop of austerity for the public sector, introduced by the new Coalition Government during 2010. This meant that the Council needed to make savings of £100m to live within its net revenue budget. A significant contribution to the savings required in 2011/12 was made by the Council’s on‐going transformation programme, which started in 2009/10, with a target of reducing the budget by £300m over four years. Further programmes of efficiencies were developed in 2011/12 to ensure that the revenue budget was not over spent, some of which were achieved ahead of schedule. This has enabled the Council to put some funding into reserves, to ease the pressure on future years’ budgets, and to support innovative programmes of work that will ensure that services are sustained as more funding reductions bite. The capital programme was also under spent, primarily as a result of slippage, meaning that schemes for which the funding was allocated will be delivered slightly later than planned. Consequently, the funding will still be used for the purpose for which it was intended.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Essex Pension Fund Board(S), Covering the Period from 1 April 2017 Until 31 March 2018
    Summons To all Members of Essex County Council You are hereby summoned to attend the meeting of the County Council to be held as shown below to deal with the business set out in the Agenda. Council Chamber, Tuesday, 10 July County Hall, 10:00 2018 Chelmsford, CM1 1QH Gavin Jones Chief Executive Officer Support to the Council: Andy Gribben, Senior Democratic Services Officer Telephone: 03330134565 Email: [email protected] Prayers The meeting will be preceded by Prayers led by The Right Reverend Hugh Allan o. praem, the Abbot of Beeleigh and Chaplain to the Chairman of Essex County Council. Public Questions A period of up to 30 minutes will be allowed for members of the public to ask questions on any business of the Council (Standing Order 16.12.10). No question shall be longer than three minutes and speakers must have registered with the clerk no later than 7 calendar days before the date of the meeting. On arrival, and before the start of the meeting, registered speakers must identify themselves to staff in order to be seated. Pages 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest To note any declarations of interest to be made by Members in accordance with the Members' Code of Conduct Page 1 of 56 3 Confirmation of the minutes of the meeting held on 15 4 - 29 May 2018 4 Chairman’s Announcements and Communications 5 Receipt of petitions 6 Executive Statements 7 Motions 30 - 31 8 The Pensions Board Annual Report 32 - 41 9 Cabinet Issues 42 - 55 Including the minutes of the meetings held on 22 May and 19 June 2018 10 To
    [Show full text]
  • Shotgate Parish Plan
    Shotgate Parish Plan Shotgate now c1955 February 2012 A Parish Plan workshop Shotgate Parish Boundaries Reproduced with the kind permission of G.I.Barnett & Son Ltd OUR PARISH COUNCIL Shotgate Parish Council meets on the second Tuesday of each month, except August, at 7-30 pm at the Baptist Church Hall in Bruce Grove. Residents are very welcome to attend all meetings and are encouraged to participate in the Open Session held just after the beginning of each meeting. This session is an opportunity for the public to speak and ask questions on matters of concern about anything within the scope of the Parish Council. CONTENTS PAGE 2 Introduction 3 How will the Plan be implemented? 4 A brief history of Shotgate 5 The Shotgate Sign 6 Chapter 1 - Shops, buildings and land use 9 Chapter 2 - The Park 13 Chapter 3 - Roads, footpaths and alleyways 18 Chapter 4 - Public transport 20 Chapter 5 - Security and vandalism 21 Chapter 6 - Action plan 24 Contacts 25 Acknowledgements 1 INTRODUCTION This document sets out the first Parish Plan for Shotgate, published in February 2012. When the Shotgate Parish Council was approved by Government and formed in May 2007, one of the essential tasks was for the Shotgate community to create a Parish Plan to provide guidance to the Council, setting out the wishes of residents for the future of Shotgate. This Parish Plan has been constructed by a Parish Plan Steering Committee (PPSC) comprising representatives of the community and three parish councillors. Its origins arose from a public workshop followed by a drop-in session, which gave residents the opportunity to highlight what they found good about Shotgate, what was bad and what needed improvement, together with ideas for additional features and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Baddow Local Register
    Borough Heritage Register of buildings of local value in Great Baddow Status: Planning guidance Great Baddow parish Design and conservation 01245 606294 [email protected] helmsford BOROUGH COUNCIL November 2009 Register of buildings of local interest Great Baddow parish Baddow Road, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Church, c.1967, designed by Donald Hendon of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints architects department. Single storey, with a lower range to the west side with yellow brickwork. Tall, slender tower also of yellow brickwork. Main block with a continuous clerestory window. Front elevation of alternating courses of dark herringbone pattern brickwork, with full height slit windows to each side. Flat roof with vertical timber boarded fascia. Significance A high quality example of a 1960s church, unusual brickwork and clerestory window to front elevation. ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Baddow Road, 95-111 Terraced houses, early 1840’s. Two storeys, hipped slate roof with chimney stacks projecting at the ridge. Gault brick laid in flemish bond. Number 95, 97 and 111 at either end project forward, treated as pavilions and have slightly more decoration with stone hoods to all window heads. Small paned windows of different styles with stone cills. Significance A good example of a mid C19 terrace, part of a group with 113-115, 117-133, 135 and 140-156** Baddow Road and forming a gateway with the latter at the Army and Navy roundabout end of Baddow Road. ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Baddow Road 113-115 House, now doctors surgery. Mid C19. Two storeys, gabled slate roof. Large off-centre gault brick chimney stack.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Policy and Scrutiny
    Corporate Policy and Scrutiny Committee Room 1 Tuesday, 29 10:30 County Hall, January 2019 Chelmsford, CM1 1QH For information about the meeting please ask for: Richard Buttress, Member Enquiries Manager Telephone: 07809 314835 Email: [email protected] Pages 1 Membership, Apologies and Declarations 4 - 4 To be reported by the Member Enquiries Manager. 2 Minutes of previous meeting 5 - 11 To note and approve the minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 27 November 2018. 3 Questions from the Public A period of up to 15 minutes will be allowed for members of the public to ask questions or make representations on any item on the agenda for this meeting. On arrival, and before the start of the meeting, please register with the Committee Officer. 4 Joint Task and Finish Group - Ringway Jacobs 12 - 17 To note report CPSC/01/19. 5 Essex County Council Reserves 18 - 29 To consider report CPSC/02/19. 6 Provisional Settlement 30 - 32 To consider report CPSC/03/19. Page 1 of 61 7 2018/19 Financial Overview as at the Third Quarter 33 - 56 Stage To consider report CPSC/04/19. 8 Work Programme 57 - 61 To note the current position regarding the committee's work programme. 9 Date of Next Meeting To note that the next meeting of the committee will be held on Tuesday 26 February 2019. 10 Urgent Business To consider any matter which in the opinion of the Chairman should be considered in public by reason of special circumstances (to be specified) as a matter of urgency.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH ESSEX F T, ! 7
    :: ; i f - SOUTH ESSEX f T, ! 7. CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT ‘I V / • W ISlEOt GI 'A1MOUTH * mEtiotouot < • M U C H IOWRTOH. • umtmc • Etf • HUNT1NGOON 1 • IE W O M ) \ IfSW KM NRA . M U 'O N KEYHEj ; 'UtWICH COICHESIEI* National Rivers Authority V CUC TOH OK SEA (HELMSEOIO Anglian Region IBILLERICA* ^ g Jj»«H A M OM«ctoucH t JW UNW '»ju(|THENOOtl su NOVEMBER 1995 CATCHMENT KEY DETAILS GENERAL Land Area 1841.54 km2 Groundwater WATER Population 1990 678,000 N o additional water available RESOURCES Projected to year 2001 694,000 Surface Water Main Towns and Populations N o additional summer water. Limited winter Southend-on-Sea water availaBle suBject to cessation (Municipal Borough) 167,200 conditions to safeguard the water Canvey Island 35,600 environment and other w’ater users. Basildon (Municipal Borough) 96,400 Stanford-le Hope/Benfleet/ PuBlic Water Supply ABstractions Hadleigh/Thundersley 49,600 Essex & Suffolk Water: There are two Chalk Corringham 32,300 puBlic water supply aBstractions in the Grays 48,100 catchment. These are located at Linford and Rayleigh 28,000 Stifford, and are licensed to aBstract 3728 (Data from Essex County Council, Planning Department) M l/a(l M l/a= 1 million litres) ADMINISTRATIVE County Council: Length of Designated Main River FLOOD DEFENCE DETAILS Essex Fluvial 313.6 km Tidal 101.4 km Borough/District Councils: Length of Main River EmBankment Basildon Brentwood Fluvial 4.5 km Castle Point Chelmsford Length of NRA Tidal Defences 145.4 km Maldon Rochford Area at risk from tidal flooding 97.5 km2 Southend-on-Sea Thurrock Area at risk from fluvial flooding 27.1 knr Unitary Authority: The Anglian Region of the NRA has no NAVIGATION London Borough of Havering statutory Navigation responsiBility within this plan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Braintree, Brentwood, Chelmsford, Maldon and Uttlesford Landscape Character Assessments
    BRAINTREE, BRENTWOOD, CHELMSFORD, MALDON AND UTTLESFORD LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENTS September 2006 CHRIS BLANDFORD ASSOCIATES Environment Landscape Planning CONTENTS Preface Executive Summary 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Study Area 1.2 Study Aims and Objectives 1.3 The Importance of Landscape Character 1.4 Planning Policy Framework 1.5 Approach and Methodology 1.6 Structure of the Report 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA 2.1 General 2.2 Physical Influences on the Shaping of the Landscape 2.3 Historical Influences on the Landscape 2.4 Key Forces for Change in the Landscape 2.5 Landscape Character in The Study Area – An Overview 3.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF BRAINTREE DISTRICT 3.1 General 3.2 River Valley Landscapes 3.3 Farmland Plateau Landscapes 3.4 Wooded Farmland Landscapes 4.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF BRENTWOOD BOROUGH 4.1 General 4.2 River Valley Landscapes 4.3 Wooded Farmland Landscapes 4.4 Fenland Landscapes 5.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF CHELMSFORD BOROUGH 5.1 General 5.2 River Valley Landscapes 5.3 Farmland Plateau Landscapes 5.4 Drained Estuarine Marsh Landscapes 5.5 Wooded Farmland Landscapes 6.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF MALDON DISTRICT 6.1 General 6.2 River Valley Landscapes 6.3 Farmland Plateau Landscapes 6.4 Estuarine Marsh/Mudflat Landscapes 6.5 Drained Estuarine Marsh Landscapes 6.6 Coastal Farmland Landscapes 6.7 Wooded Farmland Landscapes 7.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF UTTLESFORD DISTRICT 7.1 General 7.2 River Valley Landscapes 7.3 Farmland Plateau Landscapes 7.4 Chalk Upland Landscapes 11100101R Final LCAs_09-06 Contents 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 General 8.2 Key Applications of the Landscape Character Assessments 8.3 Incorporating Landscape Character into Local Development Frameworks 8.4 Monitoring Landscape Change 8.5 Enhancing the Character Evidence Base APPENDICES A.
    [Show full text]
  • RVDS Version 6.5 Final 52
    Rettendon Village Design Statement Rettendon a Village Design Statement October 2011 1 Rettendon Village Design Statement Contents 1. Introduction 03 1.1 What is a Village Design Statement 03 1.2 What does it cover 03 1.3 How was it developed 03 1.4 Current status 03 1.5 Planning context 04 1.6 Document structure 05 2. Our Parish 06 2.1 Character of the Parish 08 2.2 Geological survey 08 2.3 Classification of character areas 08 2.4 Rettendon Place 09 2.5 Rettendon Common 12 2.6 Battlesbridge 16 2.7 Housing 19 2.8 Transport 20 2.9 Public utilities 22 2.10 Leisure 23 2.11 Business 24 2.12 The natural environment 25 3. Planning Guidance 26 3.1 Guidelines for Rettendon Place character areas 27 3.2 Guidelines for Rettendon Common character areas 30 3.3 Guidelines for Battlesbridge character area 33 3.4 General guidelines 35 3.4.1 Diversity 35 3.4.2 Street Scenes 35 3.4.3 Footpaths and Cycle Paths 36 3.4.4 Transport 37 3.4.5 Extensions 38 3.4.6 Energy Saving Technology 39 3.4.7 Enforcement 39 3.4.8 The natural environment 40 3.4.9 Future Development 41 3.4.10 Sustainable Development 41 Appendices Appendix 0 - Housing Diversity and Density Rating definitions 42 Appendix 1 - Public consultation process 43 Appendix 2 - Geological survey 45 Appendix 3 - Meadow Road settlement map 46 Appendix 4 - East Hanningfield Road settlement map 47 Appendix 5 - Battlesbridge conservation area map 48 Appendix 6 - Parish map showing footpaths 49 Appendix 7 - Proposed new amenities around Meadow Road 50 Appendix 8 - Proposed ‘green’ corridors 51 Acknowledgements 52 Entrance to RHS Hyde Hall gardens 2 Rettendon Village Design Statement 1.
    [Show full text]