DOCSLIB.ORG

A Redescription of Groundwater Amphipods (Crangonyctoidea: Sternophysingidae) from Karstic Aquifers in Gauteng, South Africa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Redescription of Groundwater Amphipods (Crangonyctoidea: Sternophysingidae) from Karstic Aquifers in Gauteng, South Africa COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012). Title of the thesis or dissertation (Doctoral Thesis / Master’s Dissertation). Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/102000/0002 (Accessed: 22 August 2017). A redescription of groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctoidea: Sternophysingidae) from karstic aquifers in Gauteng, South Africa By Kimberley Anne Murray DISSERTATION Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE in ZOOLOGY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG November 2020 Supervisor: Prof. J. F. Durand Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... i List of Figures ........................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .......................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. x Abstract .................................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Aim ......................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2. Groundwater ....................................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 6 2.2 Karst ........................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Karst Formation .................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Drainage in karst landscapes ............................................................. 10 2.2.3 Karst in South Africa ......................................................................... 11 2.3 Groundwater in South Africa ................................................................ 13 2.3.1 Types of aquifers ............................................................................... 13 2.3.2 Threats to groundwater in South Africa ............................................ 14 2.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................ 15 Chapter 3. The hypogean environment .............................................................. 16 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 17 3.2 Amphipods ............................................................................................ 19 3.2.1 Taxonomy.......................................................................................... 20 Page | i 3.3 Sternophysingids ................................................................................... 21 3.3.1 Past research on sternophysingids .................................................... 23 3.3.2 Calceoli ............................................................................................. 26 3.3.3 The evolutionary history of sternophysingids ................................... 32 3.4 Threats to amphipods ............................................................................ 34 3.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................ 34 Chapter 4. The colonisation of continental groundwater ................................... 36 4.1 Models of colonisation .......................................................................... 36 4.2 Problem with predictions ...................................................................... 38 4.3 Gondwanan origins ............................................................................... 39 Chapter 5. Research design and methodology .................................................. 42 5.1 Aim and objectives ............................................................................... 42 5.2 Site selection and sample collection ..................................................... 42 5.2.1 Site selection ..................................................................................... 42 5.2.2 Sample collection .............................................................................. 43 5.3 Ethical considerations ........................................................................... 43 5.4 Illustrations and descriptions ................................................................ 44 5.5 Scanning electron microscopy .............................................................. 44 5.6 DNA extraction ..................................................................................... 45 5.7 Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) ...................................................... 46 5.8 Genetic analysis .................................................................................... 46 Chapter 6. Results .............................................................................................. 47 6.1 Sternophysinx filaris Holsinger and Straskraba, 1973 .......................... 47 ii 6.2 Sternophysinx calceola Holsinger, 1992 ............................................... 57 6.3 DNA extraction and PCR ...................................................................... 66 6.4 Genetic Analysis ................................................................................... 66 Chapter 7. Discussion ........................................................................................ 73 7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 73 7.2 Groundwater implications ..................................................................... 74 7.2.1 Conservation ..................................................................................... 75 7.3 Phylogenetic implication ...................................................................... 76 7.4 Population Structure .............................................................................. 79 7.4.1 Ecotones ............................................................................................ 80 7.5 Threats to amphipods ............................................................................ 81 7.6 Limitations and recommendations ........................................................ 83 Chapter 8. Conclusion ........................................................................................ 85 Figures ................................................................................................................. 106 iii List of Figures Figure 1. Map showing the location of the sample sites, Sterkfontein Cave, Grobler’s Cave, Bakwena Cave and Matlapitse Cave, all within the Chuniespoort dolomites of the Transvaal Supergroup (Late Archaean-Early Proterozoic) shown in blue. The Ecca Group (Lower Permian) is shown in red. Much of the vacant white region in the centre of the map is composed of the Bushveld Igneous Complex (Palaeoproterozoic). Sternophysingid amphipods are now known from habitats in all of these geological rock types. ................................................................ 12 Figure 2. Sternophysinx filaris, whole specimen (5.9 mm), Grobler’s Cave, South Africa. ........................................................................................................................................... 48 Figure 3. Scanning electron micrograph of Sternophysinx filaris collected from Sterkfontein Cave. ............................................................................................ 48 Figure 4. Sternophysinx filaris antenna 1 (upper right) and antenna 2 (lower left). Peduncles are numbered 1, 2 and 3 on antenna 1, and 4, 5 and 6 on antenna 2. .......................................................................................................................... 49 Figure 5. Scanning electron micrograph of Sternophysinx filaris specimen collected from Sterkfontein Cave. Peduncles of antennae1 and 2 shown as well as gland cones and palp of the mandible. .................................................................................. 49 Figure 6. Sternophysinx filaris upper (left) and lower lip (right) ..................................... 50 Figure 7. Sternophysinx filaris maxilla 1, showing inner lobe (left), outer lobe (right), and palp (top). .......................................................................................................... 50 Figure 8. Sternophysinx filaris maxilla 2 showing inner lobe (left) and outer lobe (right). ..........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Report for the Northern Virginia Well Amphipod (Stygobromus Phreaticus) August 2019 Version 1.1
    Species Status Assessment (SSA) Report for the Northern Virginia Well Amphipod (Stygobromus phreaticus) August 2019 Version 1.1 Stygobromus phreaticus. Photo provided by: Michelle Brown, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research for this document was prepared by Jacob Osborne (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)—North Attleboro Fish Hatchery) with technical assistance from Krishna Gifford (USFWS—Northeast Regional Office). We greatly appreciate the assistance of the following individuals who provided helpful information and/or review of the draft document: • Chris Hobson and William Orndorff (Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program) • Dorothy Keough, John Pilcicki, Christopher Manikas, and Lindsey David (U.S. Army Garrison Fort Belvoir) • Robert Denton (Geoconcepts Engineering, Inc.) • Cindy Schulz , Sumalee Hoskin, Susan Lingenfelser, and Serena Ciparis (USFWS— Virginia Ecological Services Field Office (VAFO) • Anthony Tur and Jean Brennan (USFWS—Northeast Regional Office) • Meagan Kelhart (formerly, USFWS—Headquarters) We also thank our peer reviewers: • Steve Taylor (Colorado College) • Dave Culver (American University, retired) • Dan Fong (American University) • Olivia DeLee (U.S. Geological Survey, Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center) Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019. Species status assessment for the Northern Virginia Well Amphipod (Stygobromus phreaticus). Version
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2012-0082]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/19/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-25578, and on FDsys.gov 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2012-0082] [4500030114] RIN 1018-AY20 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Revision of Critical Habitat for the Comal Springs Dryopid Beetle, Comal Springs Riffle Beetle, and Peck’s Cave Amphipod AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to revise 2 designation of critical habitat for the Comal Springs dryopid beetle (Stygoparnus comalensis), Comal Springs riffle beetle (Heterelmis comalensis), and Peck’s cave amphipod (Stygobromus pecki), under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, approximately 169 acres (68 hectares) are being proposed for revised critical habitat. The proposed revision of critical habitat is located in Comal and Hays Counties, Texas. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Cladistic Revision of Talitroidean Amphipods (Crustacea, Gammaridea), with a Proposal of a New Classification
    CladisticBlackwell Publishing, Ltd. revision of talitroidean amphipods (Crustacea, Gammaridea), with a proposal of a new classification CRISTIANA S. SEREJO Accepted: 8 December 2003 Serejo, C. S. (2004). Cladistic revision of talitroidean amphipods (Crustacea, Gammaridea), with a proposal of a new classification. — Zoologica Scripta, 33, 551–586. This paper reports the results of a cladistic analysis of the Talitroidea s.l., which includes about 400 species, in 96 genera distributed in 10 families. The analysis was performed using PAUP and was based on a character matrix of 34 terminal taxa and 43 morphological characters. Four most parsimonious trees were obtained with 175 steps (CI = 0.617, RI = 0.736). A strict consensus tree was calculated and the following general conclusions were reached. The superfamily Talitroidea is elevated herein as infraorder Talitrida, which is subdivided into three main branches: a small clade formed by Kuria and Micropythia (the Kurioidea), and two larger groups maintained as distinct superfamilies (Phliantoidea, including six families, and Talitroidea s.s., including four). Within the Talitroidea s.s., the following taxonomic changes are proposed: Hyalellidae and Najnidae are synonymized with Dogielinotidae, and treated as subfamilies; a new family rank is proposed for the Chiltoniinae. Cristiana S. Serejo, Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Quinta da Boa Vista s/n, 20940–040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Table 1 Talitroidean classification following Barnard & Karaman The talitroideans include amphipods ranging in length from 1991), Bousfield (1996) and Bousfield & Hendrycks (2002) 3 to 30 mm, and are widely distributed in the tropics and subtropics. In marine and estuarine environments, they are Superfamily Talitroidea Rafinesque, 1815 Family Ceinidae Barnard, 1972 usually found in shallow water, intertidally or even in the supra- Family Dogielinotidae Gurjanova, 1953 littoral zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Incipient Non-Adaptive Radiation by Founder Effect? Oliarus Polyphemus Fennah, 1973 – a Subterranean Model Case
    Incipient non-adaptive radiation by founder effect? Oliarus polyphemus Fennah, 1973 – a subterranean model case. (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Cixiidae) Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Biologie eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Diplom-Biologe Andreas Wessel geb. 30.11.1973 in Berlin Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Christoph Markschies Dekan der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I Prof. Dr. Lutz-Helmut Schön Gutachter/innen: 1. Prof. Dr. Hannelore Hoch 2. Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Günter Tembrock 3. Prof. Dr. Kenneth Y. Kaneshiro Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 20. Februar 2009 Incipient non-adaptive radiation by founder effect? Oliarus polyphemus Fennah, 1973 – a subterranean model case. (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Cixiidae) Doctoral Thesis by Andreas Wessel Humboldt University Berlin 2008 Dedicated to Francis G. Howarth, godfather of Hawai'ian cave ecosystems, and to the late Hampton L. Carson, who inspired modern population thinking. Ua mau ke ea o ka aina i ka pono. Zusammenfassung Die vorliegende Arbeit hat sich zum Ziel gesetzt, den Populationskomplex der hawai’ischen Höhlenzikade Oliarus polyphemus als Modellsystem für das Stu- dium schneller Artenbildungsprozesse zu erschließen. Dazu wurde ein theoretischer Rahmen aus Konzepten und daraus abgeleiteten Hypothesen zur Interpretation be- kannter Fakten und Erhebung neuer Daten entwickelt. Im Laufe der Studie wurde zur Erfassung geografischer Muster ein GIS (Geographical Information System) erstellt, das durch Einbeziehung der historischen Geologie eine präzise zeitliche Einordnung von Prozessen der Habitatsukzession erlaubt. Die Muster der biologi- schen Differenzierung der Populationen wurden durch morphometrische, etho- metrische (bioakustische) und molekulargenetische Methoden erfasst.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    DES #12-29 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program Habitat Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service June 2012 DES #12-29 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program Habitat Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service June 2012 DES #12-29 Cover Sheet COVER SHEET Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Authorization of Incidental Take and Implementation of the Habitat Conservation Plan Developed by the Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior United States Fish and Wildlife Service Type of Statement: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Responsible Official: Adam Zerrenner Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas Tel: 512-490-0057 For Information: Tanya Sommer Branch Chief U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas Tel: 512-490-0057 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received an application from the Edwards Aquifer Authority (EAA), San Antonio Water System, City of New Braunfels, City of San Marcos, and Texas State University for a permit to take certain federally protected species incidental to otherwise lawful activities pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) addresses the potential environmental consequences that may occur if the application is approved and the HCP is implemented. The Service is the lead agency under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
    [Show full text]
  • The Possibility of the Occurrence of Hay's and Kenk's Spring
    Cover Page Title: The Possibility of the Occurrence of Hay’s and Kenk’s Spring Amphipods Near the Purple Line Metro Route and Its Implications Prepared by: David C. Culver, Ph.D. Professor of Environmental Science American University 4400 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20016 Major sections: I. Credentials and expertise II. Introduction to the biology of Stygobromus amphipods in the Rock Creek drainage III. Ranges and potential ranges of Hay’s and Kenk’s spring amphipods IV. Threats to Hay’s and Kenk’s spring amphipods V. Towards a recovery plan for Hay’s and Kenk’s spring amphipods VI. References Length of report: 7 pages I certify that this is solely my statement. Affiliations are used for identification purposes only. David Clair Culver _________________________________ I. Credentials and expertise A graduate of Grinnell College (B.A.) and Yale University (Ph.D.), I have devoted most of my scientific career to the study of the biology of subterranean animals, especially in caves. I have written four books and over 100 scientific articles on the subject of subterranean life. My first book, Cave Life, published in 1982 by Harvard University Press, has been cited nearly 500 times in the scientific literature. My research over the past ten years has focused on shallow subterranean habitats, such as the seeps where Hay’s and Kenk’s spring amphipods are found. This work is summarized in the forthcoming book, written with Tanja Pipan, Shallow Subterranean Habitats: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation, to be published by Oxford University Press in June, 2014. Since 2002, under a variety of contracts and cooperative agreements, I have been working on Stygobromus amphipods in national parks of the National Capitol region, including Rock Creek Park, George Washington Memorial Parkway, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Mammal Damage Management in Maryland and DC EA
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MAMMAL DAMAGE MANAGEMENT IN MARYLAND AND WASHINGTON D.C. Prepared By: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES In Consultation With: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE May 2015 SUMMARY Maryland’s wildlife has many positive values and is an important part of life in the state. However, as human populations expand, and land is used for human needs, there is increasing potential for conflicting human/wildlife interactions. This Environmental Assessment (EA) analyzes the potential environmental impacts of alternatives for United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services (WS) involvement in the reduction of conflicts by mammals in Maryland, including damage to property, agricultural and natural resources, and risks to human and livestock health and safety. The proposed wildlife damage management activities could be conducted on public and private property in Maryland when the property owner or manager requests assistance and/or when assistance is requested by an appropriate state, federal, tribal or local government agency. The preferred alternative considered in the EA, would be to continue and expand the current Integrated Wildlife Damage Management (IWDM) program in Maryland. The IWDM strategy encompass the use of practical and effective methods of preventing or reducing damage while minimizing harmful effects of damage management measures on humans, target and non-target species, and the environment. Under this action, WS could provide technical assistance and direct operational assistance including non-lethal and lethal management methods, as described in the WS Decision Model (Slate et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)
    bs_bs_banner Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 167, 227–242. With 8 figures Cryptic diversity within and amongst spring-associated Stygobromus amphipods (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae) JOSHUA Z. ETHRIDGE1*, J. RANDY GIBSON2 and CHRIS C. NICE1 1Department of Biology, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA 2San Marcos US Fish and Wildlife Service, San Marcos, TX, USA Received 3 May 2012; revised 14 September 2012; accepted for publication 24 September 2012 Multiple species of troglomorphic, spring-associated Stygobromus amphipods, including the endangered, narrow- range endemic Stygobromus pecki, occupy sites in the Edwards Plateau region of North America. Given the prevalence of cryptic diversity observed in disparate subterranean, animal taxa, we evaluated geographical genetic variation and tested whether Stygobromus contained undetected biodiversity. Nominal Stygobromus taxa were treated as hypotheses and tested with mitochondrial sequence cytochrome oxidase C subunit 1, nuclear sequence (internal transcribed spacer region 1), and AFLP data. Stygobromus pecki population structure and diversity was characterized and compared with congeners. For several Stygobromus species, the nominal taxonomy conflicted with molecular genetic data and there was strong evidence of significant cryptic diversity. Whereas S. pecki genetic diversity was similar to that of congeners, mitochondrial data identified two significantly diverged but sympatric clades. AFLP data for S. pecki indicated relatively recent and ongoing gene flow in the nuclear genome. These data for S. pecki suggest either a substantial history of isolation followed by current sympatry and ongoing admixture, or a protracted period of extremely large effective population size. This study demonstrates that Edwards Plateau Stygobromus are a complex, genetically diverse group with substantially more diversity than currently recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition for a Recovery Plan for the Hay's Spring Amphipod
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION FOR A RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE HAY’S SPRING AMPHIPOD (STYGOBROMUS HAYI) Photo Credit: David Culver and Irena Šereg 2004 Center for Biological Diversity July 28, 2014 Sally Jewell Dan Ashe Secretary Director Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 Washington, D.C. 20240 Re: Petition to the U.S. Department of Interior and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the Development of a Recovery Plan for the Hay’s spring amphipod (Stygobromus hayi). Dear Secretary Jewell and Director Ashe: Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1533(f) of the Endangered Species Act and section 5 U.S.C. § 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, the Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) hereby petitions the U.S. Department of the Interior (“DOI”), by and through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”), to meet its mandatory duty to develop a recovery plan for the Hay’s spring amphipod (Stygobromus hayi) to ensure its full recovery. The petition requests that the Service develop a set of recovery actions to (1) improve forest habitat, including groundwater and surface water flows, around the springs where Hay’s spring amphipod are known to occur or are likely to be present, (2) address pesticide use in areas around suitable habitat, (3) identify development activities that may harm the Amphipod, (4) address flooding risks, and (5) identify additional areas in Rock Creek Park in Washington D.C. and in Maryland where reintroductions and translocation of Hay’s spring amphipods could occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 – Conservation Actions – Species
    Chapter 6 – Conservation Actions – Species Birds of Greatest Conservation Need Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus STATUS: Populations in the eastern U.S. have declined since the early 1900s. North American Breeding Bird Survey data indicate a significant population decline in North America in recent decades. Status within the District of Columbia is undetermined. RANGE: Breeds in the northern United States and southern Canada and winter in southern South America from Peru to Argentina. It is a passage migrant through the District of Columbia. LOCAL HABITAT: Kenilworth Park, Anacostia Park, Rock Creek National Park, and Fort Circle Parks area. SPECIES ECOLOGY: Bobolinks use tall grass fields, pastures, and grain fields for breeding. In some areas, they favor hayfields in close association with dairy farms. In spring and summer, their diets consists largely of insects, especially caterpillars, grasshoppers, and beetles, but in fall it also includes large quantities of weed seeds, wild rice, and bristlegrass. Nests are usually placed in a scrape, either natural or created by the female. Clutch size varies from 4 to 7 eggs. THREATS: Primary threats are due to loss of suitable habitat. Changing agricultural practices and the loss of farmland to development are key factors contributing to species decline. CONSERVATION ACTION: : Need to identify and conserve grasslands. Studies to determine precise status and habitat use within the District. SITE MAP: 4 REFERENCES: 1-4 Acadian Flycatcher Empidonax virescens STATUS: BBS data from 1966 through 1989 show stable populations in the Eastern region and in neighboring Maryland. RANGE: Breeds from southern Minnesota east through southern New England, south to Gulf Coast and central Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior FISH and WILDLIFE SERVICE 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758 512490-0057 FAX 490-0974
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758 512490-0057 FAX 490-0974 Memorandum To: Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico ThrOUgh:/~sistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico From: Field Supervisor, Austin Ecological Services Field Office, Austin, Te as Subject: Biological and Conference Opinions for the Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program Habitat Conservation Plan - Permit TE-63663A-0 (Consultation No. 214S0-201O-F-OllO) Enclosed are the biological and conference opinions for the final Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program (EARlP) Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) that describes actions the Applicants have proposed to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse effects to the endangered Texas wild-rice (Zizania texana), Comal Springs dryopid beetle (Stygoparnus comalensis), Comal Springs riffle beetle (Heterelmis comalensis), Peck's Cave amphipod (Stygobromus pecki), fountain darter (Etheostomafonticola), San Marcos gambusia (Gambusia georgei), Texas blind salamander (Typhlomolge [=EwyceaJ rathbuni), the threatened San Marcos salamander (Eurycea nana), and the non-listed Texas cave diving beetle (Haideoporus texanus, also referred to as the Edwards Aquifer diving beetle), Texas troglobitic water slater (Lirceolus smithii), and Comal Springs salamander (Eurycea sp.) over a period of IS-years. We appreciate your staffs assistance throughout this consultation. If you have any questions regarding this biological opinion, please contact Tanya Sommer at SI2-490-00S7, extension 222. The biological opinion is based on the EARIP HCP dated December 2011 and the associated Enviromnental Impact Statement dated June 2012 pursuant to the National Enviromnental Policy Act of 1969; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) files; discussions with species experts; published and un-published literature on the species of concern and related impacts; and other sources of information available to the Service.
    [Show full text]