DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Webster County, West Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Webster County, West Virginia United States In cooperation with Department of the West Virginia Agriculture Agricultural and Forestry Soil Survey of Experiment Station and Natural the United States Webster County, Resources Department of Agriculture, Conservation Forest Service Service West Virginia How to Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and go to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map units symbols that are in that area. Look at the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 2 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1991. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1992. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1992. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Elk Soil Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250 or call 1-800-245-6340 (voice) or 202-720-1127 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer. Cover: A typical landscape in an area of the Pineville-Gilpin-Guyandotte general soil map unit. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available on the Natural Resources Conservation Service home page on the World Wide Web. The address is http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. 3 Contents Cover ........................................................................ 1 GaE—Gauley extremely channery sandy How to Use This Soil Survey .................................. 2 loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, rubbly .... 26 Contents .................................................................. 4 GbB—Gilpin silt loam, 3 to 8 percent Foreword ................................................................. 7 slopes .................................................... 27 General Nature of the County ................................... 8 GbC—Gilpin silt loam, 8 to 15 percent Settlement and Population .................................... 8 slopes .................................................... 28 Farming ................................................................ 8 GbD—Gilpin silt loam, 15 to 25 percent Transportation and Industry .................................. 8 slopes .................................................... 29 Physiography, Relief, and Drainage ...................... 8 GbE—Gilpin silt loam, 25 to 35 percent Geology ................................................................ 9 slopes .................................................... 30 Climate ................................................................. 9 GbF—Gilpin silt loam, 35 to 70 percent How This Survey Was Made ................................... 10 slopes .................................................... 31 General Soil Map Units ........................................ 12 GcC—Gilpin silt loam, 3 to 15 percent Soil Descriptions ................................................ 12 slopes, very stony.................................. 31 1. Pineville-Gilpin-Guyandotte ..................... 12 GcF—Gilpin silt loam, 35 to 70 percent 2. Gilpin-Laidig ............................................ 13 slopes, very stony.................................. 32 3. Gilpin ....................................................... 13 GdE—Gilpin-Dekalb complex, 15 to 4. Shouns-Cateache-Meckesville ................ 14 35 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 33 5. Mandy-Snowdog-Gauley ......................... 14 GLF—Gilpin-Laidig association, very Detailed Soil Map Units ........................................ 16 steep, extremely stony ........................... 34 Soil Descriptions ................................................ 17 ItF—Itmann channery loam, very steep ......... 36 At—Atkins loam ............................................. 17 KaF—Kaymine very channery silt loam, CaE—Cateache channery silt loam, 15 to very steep, extremely stony ................... 36 35 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 17 LaC—Laidig channery silt loam, 8 to CeF—Cedarcreek very channery loam, 15 percent slopes .................................. 37 very steep, extremely stony ................... 18 LaD—Laidig channery silt loam, 15 to Ch—Chavies fine sandy loam ........................ 19 25 percent slopes .................................. 38 CoB—Cotaco silt loam, 3 to 8 percent LdC—Laidig channery silt loam, 3 to slopes .................................................... 20 15 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 39 Cr—Craigsville gravelly loam, 0 to LdE—Laidig channery silt loam, 15 to 5 percent slopes .................................... 21 35 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 40 DkC—Dekalb channery sandy loam, 3 to LgE—Laidig channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 22 35 percent slopes, rubbly ...................... 41 DrF—Dekalb-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to MaC—Mandy channery silt loam, 3 to 70 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 23 15 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 41 Ek—Elkins silt loam ....................................... 24 MaE—Mandy channery silt loam, 15 to 35 FeC—Fenwick loam, 3 to 15 percent percent slopes, extremely stony ............ 42 slopes, very stony.................................. 24 MaF—Mandy channery silt loam, 35 GaC—Gauley extremely channery sandy to 55 percent slopes, extremely loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes, rubbly ...... 25 stony...................................................... 43 4 MaG—Mandy channery silt loam, 55 to Cedarcreek Series ............................................. 76 70 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 44 Chavies Series ................................................... 76 MkE—Meckesville silt loam, 15 to Cotaco Series..................................................... 77 35 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 45 Craigsville Series ............................................... 78 Pe—Philo-Pope complex ................................ 46 Dekalb Series ..................................................... 78 PgG—Pineville-Gilpin complex, 55 to Elkins Series ...................................................... 79 70 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 46 Fenwick Series ................................................... 80 PLF—Pineville-Gilpin-Guyandotte Gauley Series ..................................................... 80 association, very steep, extremely Gilpin Series ....................................................... 81 stony...................................................... 48 Guyandotte Series ............................................. 82 Po—Pope loam .............................................. 49 Itmann Series ..................................................... 82 Pp—Pope-Potomac complex, very cobbly ...... 50 Kaymine Series .................................................. 83 ScF—Shouns-Cateache complex, 35 to Laidig Series ...................................................... 83 70 percent slopes, extremely stony ....... 52 Mandy Series ..................................................... 84 SmC—Simoda silt loam, 3 to 15 percent Meckesville Series.............................................. 85 slopes, very stony.................................. 53 Philo Series ........................................................ 86 SwE—Snowdog channery loam, 15 to 35 Pineville
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations Summary 2019
    WEST VIRGINIA FISHINGRegulations Summary 2019 wvdnr.gov From the Director Last year the DNR released an updated, online interactive map that provides valuable information on all aspects of fishing and hunting adventures. DNR personnel are continuing to update information and produce new, useful maps. After hearing about the need from anglers in an online survey, DNR personnel collected lake depth data and processed new bathymetry maps for 35 lakes across the state. These maps are now available on the interactive fishing map and downloadable to print or take with you on your mobile device. Also, anglers can now access the real-time streamflow conditions from the U.S. Geological Survey on our interactive fishing map. The real-time information allows anglers to check on flow and make decisions about whether fishing conditions are ideal before heading out to a stream or river. Visit wvdnr.gov/gis for more details and links to the interactive map and other map pages. You helped fund this project through the Sport Fish Restoration Program, using excise taxes on selected fishing equipment and boat fuel. I encourage you to take advantage of West Virginia’s abundant natural resources and go fishing every chance you get. And take a friend or family member with you. It’s a great way to relax and enjoy each other’s company. Stephen S. McDaniel, DNR Director DISTRICT OFFICES Main Office - South Charleston, WV 25303 324 4th Avenue Fish Management − Mark T. Scott (304) 558-2771 Law Enforcement − Col. Jerry Jenkins (304) 558-2784 License Unit − Michael Ingram (304) 558-2758 District 1 - Farmington, WV 26571 1110 Railroad Street (304) 825-6787 Fish Management − Dave Wellman Law Enforcement − Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk River Watershed Elk River
    WV Division of Water Resources An Ecological Assessment the Elk River Watershed West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resources This report summarizes the data collected in the Elk River Watershed by the Watershed Assessment Program in 1997. It includes: An Ecological Assessment of the ● ● ● ●● ●●● ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ● ● Elk River Watershed ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Water Quality Information ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● from 151 sites; ● ● ●● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ●●● ●● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ●● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Fecal Coliform Bacteria (colonies / 100ml) ● 0 - 399 ● 400 - 1999 ● > 2000 60 64 80 68 Biological Health Information 74 77 76 82 62 (Macrobenthic invertebrates) 66 42 66 74 from 135 sites; 71 51 76 53 Average WVSCI Scores 70 Bad <42 43 - 53 54 - 64 65 - 71 72 - 77 Good 78 - 82 And physical habitat and landuse pattern information that help us identify and understand the impairments that are affecting the streams of West Virginia. Cropland and Pasture Deciduous Forest Land Evergreen Forest Land Residential, Urban, Industrial Mixed Forest Land Strip Mines; Quarries; and Gravel Pits Nonforested Wetlands Transitional Areas Orchards; Groves; Vineyards; Nurseries Transportation; Communications Reservoirs Watershed Assessment Program Watershed Assessment Program The Elk River Watershed 1 An Ecological Assessment of the Elk River Watershed Report number - 05050007 - 1997 prepared by: Watershed Assessment Program Division
    [Show full text]
  • Walk Across West Virginia Route Descriptions
    WWAALLKK AACCRROOSSSS WWEESSTT VVIIRRGGIINNIIAA RROOUUTTEE DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONNSS Few of us have the time to actually Walk Across West Virginia (WAWV), but we can do a virtual Walk Across West Virginia by walking a distance equal to walking across the state. On the following pages are descriptions of five routes across West Virginia. Two are existing trails, two are hypothetical straight line routes through the geographical center of the state and one is a combination of trails and public roads. The longest route across the state is 281 miles. If you walked 5.5 miles a week or 21.5 miles a month, in your local neighborhood, you would equal the longest distance in less than a year. So why not set a personal goal of Walking Across West Virginia this year! Record the date you reach a specific mileage point on one of the routes to track your progress. You can use the mileage tracking chart found on the WAWV website to track your accumulated miles. Include your family members in your trip. You might enhance the “virtual” experience by actually walking parts of the existing trails nearest you, or by visiting some of the areas traversed by the hypothetical routes. The West to East route across the state also includes “trivia questions” about West Virginia. See how much you know about West Virginia.! Allegheny Trail Milage Listing Date Mileage Elevation Description _____ 0.0 2182 Pennsylvania/West Virginia State Line close to Bruceton Mills on Local Route 4 _____ 8.0 1495 Cross under I-68 _____ 13.3 1693 Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of West Virginia Water-Resources Data Through
    Prepared in cooperation with the West Virginia Division of Water and Waste Management Summary of West Virginia Water-Resources Data through September 2008 By R.D. Evaldi, S.M. Ward, and J.S. White Open-File Report 2009-1199 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2009 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Evaldi, R.D., Ward, S.M., and White, J.S., 2009, Summary of West Virginia water-resources data through September 2008: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1199, 326 p. ii Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Data Presentation ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Individual Permit Application
    Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Individual Permit Application Prepared for: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC 2200 Energy Drive, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. 661 Andersen Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220 Submitted to: United States Army Corps of Engineers – Pittsburgh District 1000 Liberty Avenue, Suite 2200, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 United States Army Corps of Engineers – Huntington District 502 Eighth Street, Huntington, WV 25701-2070 United States Army Corps of Engineers – Norfolk District 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA 23510-1011 Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 1111 E Main Street, Richmond, VA 23219 Virginia Marine Resources Commission 380 Frenwick Road, Fort Monroe, VA 23651 February 2021 Mountain Valley Pipeline Project USACE Individual Permit Application February 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page PROJECT INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 1 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and USACE Individual Permit Application Forms ............................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description and History ..................................................................................... 1 General Construction Information .................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Pipeline Construction Description .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations
    FISHING REGULATIONS SUMMARY 2021 FROM THE DIRECTOR My grandmother used to say, “When life gives you lemons, make lemonade.” Well, 2020 could certainly fall into the “lemons” category, but from a fish management standpoint, things could not have gone better. The COVID pandemic motivated millions of Americans to step outside and take in all that Mother Nature has to offer. The West Virginia mountains provide an ideal backdrop for this increased outdoor activity. Our parks, streams and lakes have experienced record attendance, and fishing licenses sales have been robust. Our fish management professionals were behind the scenes making things happen. We continued to work on improving fish habitat, stocking trout and other species, as well as kicking off our $40 million hatchery renovation program. Our hatcheries had been neglected for decades. We started with the hatchery at Bowden. Early last year, Bowden began receiving a $10 million makeover. When finished, it will not only provide state of the art facilities but will increase rearing capacity by 50 percent. When all the renovations are complete, our hatcheries will be able to produce well over one million pounds of trout annually. Looking forward to 2021, we anticipate expanding our Gold Rush event, continuing to improve fish habitat, and developing new special regulation areas and events to create more exciting opportunities for anglers throughout West Virginia. I hope the upcoming season is a special one, and until next time ”tight lines” for everyone. Hancock Stephen S. McDaniel, DNR Director Brooke Ohio Marshall Monongalia Wetzel Morgan Marion Tyler Preston Berkeley Mineral Pleasants Jeerson Taylor Hampshire Harrison Doddridge Grant ___________________ Wood Barbour Ritchie Tucker District Offices Wirt Lewis Hardy Gilmer Randolph Jackson Mason Calhoun Upshur Roane Braxton Main Office - South Charleston, WV 25303 Pendleton Putnam Webster Clay 324 4th Avenue Cabell Kanawha Fish Management − Mark T.
    [Show full text]
  • Cdrl Property Listing
    CDRL PROPERTY LISTING County Classification Address City Barbour Residence 341 LITTLE HACKER ROAD PHILIPPI Barbour Hotel/Motel US 250 / ROUTE 4 BOX 155 ROOM 106 (MOUNTAINEER INN) PHILIPPI Barbour Automobile ROUTE 1 US 119 BURNERS TOWING PHILIPPI Barbour Hotel/Motel BUDGET IN US 250 ROOM 207 PHILIPPI Barbour Automobile US ROUTE 19, CAB OF PICK-UP TRUCK PHILIPPI Barbour Automobile 115 ROUTE 119 AT AB COLLEGE BASEBALL FIELD PHILIPPI Barbour Residence ROUTE 4 BOX 341 (RT 1 BOX 367, MOATSVILLE) PHILIPPI Barbour Apartment 212 CHESTNUT STREET - BAUGHMAN TOWERS APARTMENTS PHILIPPI Barbour Dump Site MAPLE LANE OFF 119 PHILIPPI Barbour Dump Site 1583 ENGLAND RUN ROAD PHILIPPI Barbour Residence 55 EAST SPALL LICK ROAD PHILIPPI Barbour Dump Site 1717 SILENT GROVE RD PHILIPPI Barbour Dump Site 604 NEWMAN HILL ROAD PHILIPPI Barbour Residence 145 MAIN STREET MONTROSE Barbour Residence RR 1 BOX 167 A MONTROSE Barbour Residence 105 ROW AVENUE JUNIOR Barbour Residence 214 1ST STREET JUNIOR Barbour Dump Site WELL ROAD BROWNTON Barbour Residence 117 3RD STREET BELINGTON Barbour Residence 164 HIGHLAND AVENUE BELINGTON Barbour Automobile ROUTE 250/92 PHILIPPI PIKE BELINGTON Barbour Automobile 506 HALL AVENUE BELINGTON Barbour Residence 200 BEVERLY PIKE BELINGTON Barbour Residence RT 2 BOX 276 BELINGTON Barbour Residence 7389 BARBOUR COUNTY HIGHWAY BELINGTON Barbour Unknown 1 MI EAST OF US ROUTE 250, NORTH EDGE OF JACKSON STREET Barbour Dump Site 1ST STREET Berkeley Residence 487 UNIVERSE DRIVE MARTINSBURG Berkeley Apartment 121 NORTH CHURCH STREET, APT 4 MARTINSBURG
    [Show full text]
  • Title 47 Legislative Rule Department of Environmental Protection Water Resources
    47CSR2 TITLE 47 LEGISLATIVE RULE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WATER RESOURCES SERIES 2 REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS §47-2-1. General. Resources for cool water fisheries, with summer residence times greater than 14 days. 1.1. Scope. -- These rules establish requirements governing the discharge or deposit 2.3. "Cumulative" means a pollutant which of sewage, industrial wastes and other wastes increases in concentration in an organism by into the waters of the state and establish water successive additions at different times or in quality standards for the waters of the State different ways (bio-accumulation). standing or flowing over the surface of the State. It is declared to be the public policy of the State 2.4. "Designated uses" are those uses of West Virginia to maintain reasonable specified in water quality standards for each standards of purity and quality of the water of water or segment whether or not they are being the State consistent with (1) public health and attained. (See sections 6.2 - 6.6, herein) public enjoyment thereof; (2) the propagation and protection of animal, bird, fish, and other 2.5. "Dissolved metal" is operationally aquatic and plant life; and (3) the expansion of defined as that portion of metal which passes employment opportunities, maintenance and through a 0.45 micron filter. expansion of agriculture and the provision of a permanent foundation for healthy industrial 2.6. "Existing uses" are those uses actually development. (See W. Va. Code §22-11-2.) attained in a water on or after November 28, 1975, whether or not they are included in the 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit Leveling in West Virginia
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 632 SPIRIT LEVELING IN WEST VIRGINIA 1896 TO 1915, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER Work done in cooperation with the West Virginia State Geological Survey during 1898 to 1315, inclusive I. C. WHITE, State Geologist WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 10 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation............................................................ 5 Previous publication...................:.............................. 5 Personnel............................................................. 5 Classification.......................................................... 5 Bench marks........................................................... 6 Datura............................................................... 6 Topographic maps. ................................................ ^.... 7 Precise leveling............................................................ 8 Blacksville, Fairmont, and Morgantown quadrangles (Marion, Monongalia, and Taylor counties)................................................. 8 Charleston, Hinton, Kanawha Falls, Lewisburg, and Kaleigh 30X quad­ rangles; Charleston Special, Fayetteville, and Montgomery 15' quad­ rangles (Fayette, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Raleigh
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Valley Pipeline Project State of WV Application for Individual
    Mountain Valley Pipeline Project State of WV Application for Individual 401 Water Quality Certification for Non Coal Related Activity Prepared for: Mountain Valley Pipeline, Inc. 555 Southpointe Boulevard, Suite 200 Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. 661 Anderson Drive Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220 (412) 921-7090 Fax (412) 921-4040 Submitted to: WV Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water and Waste Management 401 Certification Program 601 57th Street SE Charleston, WV 25304 December 2016 Mountain Valley Pipeline Project 401 Certification Application – WV December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES...........................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF DRAWINGS.......................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Darter Status Assessment Report
    CRYSTAL DARTER STATUS ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared by: David Grandmaison and Joseph Mayasich Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 and David Etnier Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee 569 Dabney Hall Knoxville, TN 37996-1610 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 1 Federal Drive Fort Snelling, MN 55111 October 2003 NRRI Technical Report No. NRRI/TR-2003/19 DISCLAIMER This document is a compilation of biological data and a description of past, present, and likely future threats to the crystal darter, Crystallaria asprella (Jordan). It does not represent a decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on whether this taxon should be designated as a candidate species for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act. That decision will be made by the Service after reviewing this document; other relevant biological and threat data not included herein; and all relevant laws, regulations, and policies. The result of the decision will be posted on the Service's Region 3 Web site (refer to: http://midwest.fws.gov/eco_serv/endangrd/lists/concern.html). If designated as a candidate species, the taxon will subsequently be added to the Service's candidate species list that is periodically published in the Federal Register and posted on the World Wide Web (refer to: http://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html). Even if the taxon does not warrant candidate status it should benefit from the conservation recommendations
    [Show full text]