DOCSLIB.ORG

CIA) by Jeffrey Scudder During CY 2012, and Any Associated Enclosures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CIA) by Jeffrey Scudder During CY 2012, and Any Associated Enclosures Description of document: Freedom of Information Act FOIA request letters submitted to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) by Jeffrey Scudder during CY 2012, and any associated enclosures Requested date: 05-July-2014 Released date: 11-December-2015 Posted date: 04-January-2016 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Central Intelligence Agency Washington. D.C. 20505 11December2015 Reference: F-2014-02121 This is a final response to Item 1 of your 5 July 2014 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for "a copy of each FOIA request letter submitted by Jeffrey Scudder during calendar year 2012, and any associated enclosures." As you will recall. in our 16 September 2014 letter, we informed you that we had already begun processing a request for this information in connection with an earlier FOIA request received prior to yours. We cross­ referenced your request to the earlier one in order to send you any records that were found to be releasable. As a result of our searches undertaken in connection with the earlier request, we located three documents, consisting of 83 pages, that we determined were releasable in segregable form with deletions made on the basis of FOIA exemptions (b)(l), (b)(3), and (b)(6). Copies of the documents and an explanation of exemptions are enclosed. Exemption (b )(3) pertains to information exempt from disclosure by statute. The relevant statutes are Section 6 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, as amended, and Section 102A(i)(l) of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended. As the CIA Information and Privacy Coordinator, I am the CIA official responsible for this determination. You have the right to appeal this response to the Agency Release Panel, in my care, within 45 days from the date of this letter. Please include the basis of your appeal. We responded regarding Item 2 of your request on 16 September 201 4. Sincerely, f'pJJjawk~ Michael Lavergne Information and Privacy Coordinator Enclosures Explanation of Exemptions Freedom of Information Act: (b)(1) exempts from disclosure information currently and properly classified, pursuant to an Executive Order; (b)(2) exempts from disclosure information, which pertains solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the Agency; (b)(3) exempts from disclosure information that another federal statute protects, provided that the other federal statute either requires that the matters be withheld, or establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld. The (b)(3) statutes upon which the CIA relies include, but are not limited to, the CIA Act of 1949; (b)( 4) exempts from disclosure trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is obtained from a person and that is privileged or confidential; (b)( 5) exempts from disclosure inter-and intra-agency memoranda or letters that would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency; (b)(6) exempts from disclosure information from personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy; (b)(7) exempts from disclosure information compiled for law enforcement purposes to the extent that the production of the information (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings; (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication; (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source or, in the case of information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source ; (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law; or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger any individual's life or physical safety; (b)(8) exempts from disclosure information contained in reports or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, or on behalf of, or for use of an agency responsible for regulating or supervising financial institutions; and (b)(9) exempts from disclosure geological.and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. April2012 C05615999 Approved for Release: 2015/10/05 C05615999 Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Coordinator: Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. subsection 552, I am requesting Electronic copies of 133 Studies in Intelligence (Sii) articles listed in the accompanying pages. Background - The 133 articles have either been released in sanitized versions or are somewhere in the redaction and release process. In the past three years the Agency made PDF copies of all Sii articles ever written. These are excellent quality copies and in electric PDF form can be searched. I would .like to get the requested articles from the newly .scanned files in electronic form. The accompanying pages list 133 articles; their name, year, volume, issue along with CADRE case and document number where available. The newly scanned versions of these documents are stored in HR/Center for the Study of Intelligence and in IMS/Historic Collection Division servers. As I am familiar with these documents I am more thah willing to help in locating requested documents. If there are any fees for searching for, reviewing, orcopying the records, please notify me before processing if the amount exceeds $200:00. Per32 CFR Parts 1900, 1901, 1907, 1908, and 1909 the cost for a CD is $20.. One DVD's should be enough to store all 133 documents and I assume the costfor a CD or DVD is the same. If you deny all or any part of this request, please cite each specific exemption you think justifies your refusal to release the information and notify me of appeal procedures available under the law. (b)(3) JLvou have amL.ftUestions aboy1 handlina this reauest, you mav teleohone me at 1 ; ,_. ~brflt my worlf \e-mail a~ [!1 ff Scu'oaer '------ , ~x~ I I (b)(6) (b)(3) / cer-eiv. .___! <., eff Scudder ___ ',i J (b)(6) Approved for Release: 2015/10/05 C05615999 C05615999 Approved for Release: 2015/10/05 C05615999 (b)(3) .. -': 25 3 . 26 3 25 2 29 1 ·27 1 30 3 27 4 28 1 24 2 25 2 .. 27 2 28 1 . 24 4 25 3 24 4 36 4 25 4 26 · 3 33 4 28 2 27 1 31 4 33 2 30 4 32 2 38 2 (b)(1) 1of5 (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2015/10/05 C05615999 C05615999 Approved for Release: 2015/10/05 C05615999 ,·. ... ; ·' ' (b)(3) 32 1 ·27 4 31 4 38 1 ·,33 1 37 ·. 1 32 1 30 1 30 · 4 24 · 4 27 4 32 .1 31 • 3 (b)(1) 29 3 . 37 .. •. 3 (b)(3) 26 3 28 4 35 2 (b)(1) 29 1 . 33 3 (b)(3) . 37 4 34 4 34 2 36 2 34 3 35 2 (b)(1) (b}(3) 38 1 28 2 32 4 31 1 31 3 29 3 (b)(1) 32 3 (b)(3) 2of5 Approved for Release: 2015/10/05 C05615999 )> "C "C ~(1) Q. O' DOCUMENTARY ...., REMEMBRANCE ;:u (1) Aitlcle . (i) Article ti) (/I c VOi 28 ~ issue 2 Article (1) Aitlcle Article 0 Article "'..... Article ~ Article ...... Article. Q 0 Article 01 () 0 01 O>...... 01 CD CD '.· ~ ' : I-"''---· .,,.~'""· ,___ CD ' 36 '· . '. 36 ~ :, " 36 . "· 32 36 '30 32 . 3of 5 ):lo "'C "'C ~ 0 "'C < (I)a. ~(I) a. O'.... O' ;:o .... (I) <D Q) (/) ~ N 0.... ~.... e 0 CJ1 () 0 CJ1 ....a> CJ1 rticle <O rtlcle <O icle <O 4 of 5 loo "U . '· "U.., 0 < ·\.· 39 a.(1) 47 O'.., 39 ;;o 47 (1) <D 47 Ill 39 (/I 5 (1) 47 N · 47 0...... 48 U1 -...... 0 0 -U1 () 0 .......... U1 C" a> .......... ...... -w U1 (0 (0 - (0 ~ . \ •. 5 of 5 C05616000 Approved for Release: 2015/10/05 C05616000 Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Coordinator: Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. subsection 552, I am requesting Electronic copies of 282 Studies in Intelligence (Sii) articles listed in the accompanying pages. I believe these 282 articles have never been released. In the past three years the Agency made PDF copies of all Sii articles ever written.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open Secrets
    22 BACK PAGE LAW STORIES 15 January 2021 | www.newlawjournal.co.uk Open secrets In a tribute to John Le Carré, Athelstane Aamodt reflects on the operation & enforcement of official secrets laws © Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP/Shutterstock ne of the things that nearly communication of information’ under (the have. Further, the House of Lords’ decision everyone knew about the late now-abolished) s 2 of the Official Secrets most likely caused sales of the book to John Le Carré was that he had Act 1911. The basis for prosecuting them increase, thereby making things even Oworked in British Intelligence, was an article that they had written in the worse. The House of Lords eventually first for MI5 (domestic counter- magazine Time Out about the intelligence saw sense and in A-G v Guardian intelligence) and then for MI6 (foreign services. One of the photographs that had Newspapers Ltd (No 2) [1988] 3 All ER 545 intelligence). His life as an intelligence featured in the article was a photograph discharged the interim injunction on the officer provided ample inspiration for of the Post-Office Tower. The trial was a basis that the worldwide dissemination his many novels. For years, the British cause célèbre, with the first trial being of the book had already caused the Government would not even acknowledge abandoned after it was discovered that, harm that the British government had the existence of MI5 and MI6. MI5 was among other things, the security services complained about. Unsurprisingly, the first mentioned in parliament in 1952 and had been vetting the jury.
    [Show full text]
  • SPYCATCHER by PETER WRIGHT with Paul Greengrass WILLIAM
    SPYCATCHER by PETER WRIGHT with Paul Greengrass WILLIAM HEINEMANN: AUSTRALIA First published in 1987 by HEINEMANN PUBLISHERS AUSTRALIA (A division of Octopus Publishing Group/Australia Pty Ltd) 85 Abinger Street, Richmond, Victoria, 3121. Copyright (c) 1987 by Peter Wright ISBN 0-85561-166-9 All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher. TO MY WIFE LOIS Prologue For years I had wondered what the last day would be like. In January 1976 after two decades in the top echelons of the British Security Service, MI5, it was time to rejoin the real world. I emerged for the final time from Euston Road tube station. The winter sun shone brightly as I made my way down Gower Street toward Trafalgar Square. Fifty yards on I turned into the unmarked entrance to an anonymous office block. Tucked between an art college and a hospital stood the unlikely headquarters of British Counterespionage. I showed my pass to the policeman standing discreetly in the reception alcove and took one of the specially programmed lifts which carry senior officers to the sixth-floor inner sanctum. I walked silently down the corridor to my room next to the Director-General's suite. The offices were quiet. Far below I could hear the rumble of tube trains carrying commuters to the West End. I unlocked my door. In front of me stood the essential tools of the intelligence officer’s trade - a desk, two telephones, one scrambled for outside calls, and to one side a large green metal safe with an oversized combination lock on the front.
    [Show full text]
  • Harold Wilson Obituary
    Make a contribution News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle UK World Business Football UK politics Environment Education Society Science Tech More Harold Wilson obituary Leading Labour beyond pipe dreams Geoffrey Goodman Thu 25 May 1995 09.59 EDT 18 Lord Wilson of Rievaulx, as he came improbably to be called - will not go down in the history books as one of Britain's greatest prime ministers. But, increasingly, he will be seen as a far bigger political figure than contemporary sceptics have allowed far more representative of that uniquely ambivalent mood of Britain in the 1960s and a far more rounded and caring, if unfulfilled, person. It is my view that he was a remarkable prime minister and, indeed, a quite remarkable man. Cynics had a field day ridiculing him at the time of his decline. Perhaps that was inevitable given his irresistible tendency to behave like the master of the Big Trick in the circus ring of politics - for whom there is nothing so humiliating as to have it demonstrated, often by fellow tricksters, that the Big Trick hasn't worked. James Harold Wilson happened to be prime minister leading a left wing party at a time when the mores of post-war political and economic change in Britain (and elsewhere) were just beginning to be perceived. Arguably it was the period of the greatest social and industrial change this century, even if the people - let alone the Wilson governments - were never fully aware of the nature of that change. Social relationships across the entire class spectrum were being transformed.
    [Show full text]
  • RICHARD M. BISSELL JR. PAPERS SUBJECT SERIES 1935 – 1994; Boxes 1 - 12
    RICHARD M. BISSELL JR. PAPERS SUBJECT SERIES 1935 – 1994; Boxes 1 - 12 SERIES DESCRIPTION Alphabetical Subseries: Boxes 1 - 5 Alphabetical/Intelligence Subseries: Boxes 6 - 12 CONTENT This series contains an alphabetical listing of subjects pertaining to Richard M. Bissell Jr.’s personal and professional lives. Included herein are files documenting his childhood, his personal life, his career at the Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA), his career at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), organizations to which he belonged, individuals with whom he had personal and professional relationships, and other topics. Document types include correspondence, interviews, memoranda, newspaper clippings, reports, magazine articles and notes. This series contains the bulk of the information in this collection regarding the Central Intelligence Agency to be found in this collection. Further information relating to the Central Intelligence Agency may be found in the Correspondence Series, the Historic and Oversize Papers Series, the Interviews Series, the Oral History Interviews Series. Document copies marked “Original filed for safekeeping” were created by Bissell’s office staff who then filed the originals in what is now the Historic Papers, Oversize Objects and Clippings Series of this collection. As was his apparent practice, many of Bissell’s notes in this series are written on the reverse of University of Hartford budget documents as well as on unused letterhead. STRUCTURE This series arrived at the library divided into two alphabetized subseries; a collection of alphabetized subject files relating to various facets of Richard M. Bissell’s personal and professional lives from childhood to retirement, and a collection of alphabetized files related to matters of intelligence and intelligence gathering.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence
    Russia • Military / Security Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, No. 5 PRINGLE At its peak, the KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti) was the largest HISTORICAL secret police and espionage organization in the world. It became so influential DICTIONARY OF in Soviet politics that several of its directors moved on to become premiers of the Soviet Union. In fact, Russian president Vladimir V. Putin is a former head of the KGB. The GRU (Glavnoe Razvedvitelnoe Upravleniye) is the principal intelligence unit of the Russian armed forces, having been established in 1920 by Leon Trotsky during the Russian civil war. It was the first subordinate to the KGB, and although the KGB broke up with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the GRU remains intact, cohesive, highly efficient, and with far greater resources than its civilian counterparts. & The KGB and GRU are just two of the many Russian and Soviet intelli- gence agencies covered in Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence. Through a list of acronyms and abbreviations, a chronology, an introductory HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF essay, a bibliography, and hundreds of cross-referenced dictionary entries, a clear picture of this subject is presented. Entries also cover Russian and Soviet leaders, leading intelligence and security officers, the Lenin and Stalin purges, the gulag, and noted espionage cases. INTELLIGENCE Robert W. Pringle is a former foreign service officer and intelligence analyst RUSSIAN with a lifelong interest in Russian security. He has served as a diplomat and intelligence professional in Africa, the former Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe. For orders and information please contact the publisher && SOVIET Scarecrow Press, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert M. Gates, Ph.D
    Robert M. Gates, Ph.D. Secretary of Defense (2006-2011); Author, New York Times Best Seller, DUTY: Memoirs of a Cuyahoga Community College Secretary at War and A Passion for Leadership Cuyahoga Community College (Tri-C®) is a regional leader in public education, academic Robert Gates served as the 22nd secretary of defense (2006-2011) and is the only secretary innovation and cultural enrichment. For more than 55 years, the College has tailored its of defense in U.S. history to be asked to remain in that office by a newly elected President. curriculum to meet changing workforce demands, helping individuals qualify for work in the President Barack Obama is the eighth president Gates has served. He previously served under job market’s most sought-after fields. With six Centers of Excellence and more than 140 career, President George W. Bush. technical and liberal arts programs, Tri-C empowers students by providing clear pathways On Gates’ last day in office, President Barack Obama awarded him the Presidential Medal of to degree and certificate completion. Tri-C has helped more than 900,000 students toward Freedom, America’s highest civilian honor. meaningful careers or advanced education, and more than 85 percent of Tri-C graduates Before becoming secretary of defense in 2006, Gates was the president of Texas A&M University, continue to live in the area, providing a pool of skilled workers that includes nurses, teachers, the nation’s seventh largest university. Prior to assuming the Texas A&M presidency on August medical technicians, firefighters, engineers, police officers and business professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios
    Intelligence Reform and Counterterrorism after a Decade: Are We Smarter and Safer? October 16 – 18, 2014 University of Texas at Austin THURSDAY, OCTOBER 16 Blanton Museum, UT Campus 4:00-5:00pm Welcome Remarks and Discussion: Admiral William McRaven (ret.) Admiral McRaven is the ninth commander of United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base, Fla. USSOCOM ensures the readiness of joint special operations forces and, as directed, conducts operations worldwide. McRaven served from June 2008 to June 2011 as the 11th commander of Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) headquartered at Fort Bragg, N.C. JSOC is charged to study special operations requirements and techniques, ensure interoperability and equipment standardization, plan and conduct special operations exercises and training, and develop joint special operations tactics. He served from June 2006 to March 2008 as commander, Special Operations Command Europe (SOCEUR). In addition to his duties as commander, SOCEUR, he was designated as the first director of the NATO Special Operations Forces Coordination Centre where he was charged with enhancing the capabilities and interoperability of all NATO Special Operations Forces. McRaven has commanded at every level within the special operations community, including assignments as deputy commanding general for Operations at JSOC; commodore of Naval Special Warfare Group One; commander of SEAL Team Three; task group commander in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility; task unit commander during Desert Storm and Desert Shield; squadron commander at Naval Special Warfare Development Group; and SEAL platoon commander at Underwater Demolition Team 21/SEAL Team Four. His diverse staff and interagency experience includes assignments as the director for Strategic Planning in the Office of Combating Terrorism on the National Security Council Staff; assessment director at USSOCOM, on the staff of the Chief of Naval Operations, and the chief of staff at Naval Special Warfare Group One.
    [Show full text]
  • Witness Statement of Officer a 27 May 2016
    KIN-3505 INQUIRY INTO HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE 1922 TO 1995 WITNESS STATEMENT I, SIS Officer A, will say as follows: 1. I have been employed by the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) since August 1989 in a range of roles in the UK and overseas. I became a Deputy Director in 2012 and, since October 2015, have been Deputy Director responsible for compliance and disclosure matters. It is the longstanding policy of SIS that the identities of its officers, other than the Chief of the Service, are not publicly disclosed, for operational reasons and in order to ensure the safety of them and their families. 2. In my current role, I oversee the compliance of SIS operations with the law and other relevant guidance and directives. This role includes overseeing the Service’s response to legal cases and disclosure requests related to a range of issues, including legacy matters in Northern Ireland. In this capacity, I provide assurance to C, the Service’s Accounting Officer, that we are effectively meeting our legal obligations. 3. The Secret Intelligence Service, often referred to as MI6, was established in 1909 as the Foreign Section of the Secret Service Bureau. Until 1994, SIS did not have a statutory basis and its existence was not publicly confirmed. In 1992, SIS was formally avowed in 1992 and was put on a statutory basis with the Intelligence Services Act 1994. 4. The role of SIS, as set out in the Intelligence Services Act 1994, is to provide Her Majesty's Government with a global covert capability that facilitates the collection of secret intelligence and mount operations overseas to promote and defend the national security and economic wellbeing of the United Kingdom, and to prevent and detect serious crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Measures: the Secret History of Disinformation & Political
    Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation & Political Warfare | Thomas Rid Philosophers have only interpreted the world. The point, May 25th, 2020 however, is to change it. — Karl Marx INTRODUCTION Thomas Rid is Professor of Strategic Studies at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. Rid’s latest book, Active Measures, a startling history of disinformation, was published in late April 2020 with Farrar, Straus and Giroux (also in Russian, Japanese, Polish). His most recent book, Rise of the Machines (2016), tells the sweeping story of how cybernetics, a late- 1940s theory of machines, came to incite anarchy and war (also in Chinese, Russian, German, Japanese, Turkish). His 2015 article “Attributing Cyber Attacks” was designed to explain, guide, and improve the identification of network breaches (Journal of Strategic Studies 2015). In 2013 he published the widely-read book Cyber War Will Not Take Place. Rid’s Ph.D. thesis, “War and Media Operations: The US Military and the Press from Vietnam to Iraq,” was the first academic analysis of the role of embedded media in the 2003 Iraq War, providing a concise history of US military public affairs management since Vietnam. Rid testified on information security in front of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence as well as in the German Bundestag and the UK Parliament. From 2011 to 2016, Rid was a professor in the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. Between 2003 and 2010, he worked at major think tanks in Berlin, Paris, Jerusalem, and Washington, DC. Rid holds a PhD from Humboldt University in Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Huddersfield Repository University of Huddersfield Repository Dorril, Stephen A Critical Review: MI6: Fifty years of special operations Original Citation Dorril, Stephen (2010) A Critical Review: MI6: Fifty years of special operations. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/9763/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ University of Huddersfield PhD by Publication STEPHEN DORRIL A Critical Review: MI6: FIFTY YEARS OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS Presented December 2010 1 I would like to thank Professor Keith Laybourn for his welcome comments and generous support during the writing of this review. - Stephen Dorril 2 CONTENTS 1. THE REVIEW page 4 to page 40 - Introduction page 4 to page 8 - Methodology and Research page 9 to page 25 - Contents page 26 to page 35 - Impact page 36 to page 40 - Conclusion page 41 to page 42 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Union and the British General Strike of 1926 Alastair Kocho-Williams University of the West of England, Bristol [email protected]
    The Soviet Union and the British General Strike of 1926 Alastair Kocho-Williams University of the West of England, Bristol [email protected] This paper addresses the Soviet analysis and response to the British General Strike of 1926 in the light of newly available documents. The recently discovered and published stenograms of Politburo meetings provide new information concerning Soviet politics and the political process. Previously, scholars have had only Soviet official documents and protocols of Politburo meetings, which only detail participants with a brief summary of decisions (vypuski) along with who received these summaries.1 From the protocols, and other sources, scholars were aware that verbatim stenograms existed, some of which were published and distributed to Central Committee members and other party leaders with instructions for them to be returned after they had been read.2 Amongst the ‘lost Politburo stenograms’ is the record of a lengthy, heated, discussion of the ‘lessons of the British General Strike’ on 3 June 1926.3 It is this that the current paper is chiefly concerned with, detailing the Soviet stance towards the General Strike, inconsistency in the Soviet analysis, the extent to which Soviet internal politics was linked to foreign policy, how as senior figures disagreed factions developed around divisions in policy, and the way in which the handling of the international situation formed a strand of the opposition to Stalin and the Politburo majority in 1926.4 The British General Strike ran from 4-12 May 1926. Although it drew British industry to a halt, and hadn’t been planned much in advance, there had been ample warning of a coming labour dispute, of which the British and Soviet Governments were well aware, although the Soviets had concluded that major action was unlikely I am grateful to Paul Gregory and Alexander Vatlin for their assistance in the writing of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliances and Partnerships in American National Security
    FOURTH ANNUAL TEXAS NATIONAL SECURITY FORUM ALLIANCES AND PARTNERSHIPS IN AMERICAN NATIONAL SECURITY ETTER-HARBIN ALUMNI CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN OCTOBER 12, 2017 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM Welcome by William Inboden, Executive Director of the Clements Center for National Security, and Robert Chesney, Director of the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law 8:45 AM - 10:00 AM • Panel One: Defense Perspectives Moderator: Aaron O’Connell, Clements Center and Department of History Aaron O'Connell is an Associate Professor of History at the University of Texas at Austin and Faculty Fellow at the Clements Center. Previously, he served as Director for Defense Policy & Strategy on the National Security Council at the White House, where he worked on a range of national security matters including security cooperation and assistance, defense matters in Africa, significant military exercises, landmine and cluster munitions policy, and high-technology matters affecting the national defense, such as autonomy in weapon systems. Dr. O’Connell is also the author of Underdogs: The Making of the Modern Marine Corps, which explores how the Marine Corps rose from relative unpopularity to become the most prestigious armed service in the United States. He is also the editor of Our Latest Longest War: Losing Hearts and Minds in Afghanistan, which is a critical account of U.S. efforts in Afghanistan since 2001. He has also authored a number of articles and book chapters on military affairs and the representations of the military in U.S. popular culture in the 20th century. His commentary has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, and The Chronicle of Higher Education.
    [Show full text]