November 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Girls to the Mic 2014 PDF.Pdf
Girls To The Mic! This March 8 it’s Girls to the Mic! In an Australian first, the Community Broadcasting Association of Australia’s Digital Radio Project and Community Radio Network are thrilled to be presenting a day of radio made by women, to be enjoyed by everyone. Soundtrack your International Women’s Day with a digital pop up radio station in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth, and online at www.girlstothemic.org. Tune in to hear ideas, discussion, storytelling and music celebrating women within our communities, across Australia and around the world. Set your dial to Girls to the Mic! to hear unique perspectives on women in politics on Backchat from Sydney’s FBi Radio, in our communities with 3CR’s Women on the Line, seminal women’s music programming from RTR’s Drastic on Plastic from Perth, and a countdown of the top women in arts and culture from 2SER’s so(hot)rightnow with Vivid Ideas director Jess Scully. We’ll hear about indigenous women in Alice Springs with Women’s Business, while 3CR’s Accent of Women take us on an exploration of grassroots organising by women around the world. Look back at what has been a phenomenal year for women and women’s rights, and look forward to the achievements to come, with brekkie programming from Kulja Coulston at Melbourne’s RRR and lunchtime programming from Bridget Backhaus and Ellie Freeman at Brisbane’s 4EB, and an extra special Girls Gone Mild at FBi Radio celebrating the creative, inspiring and world changing women who ought to dominate the airwaves daily. -
Music on PBS: a History of Music Programming at a Community Radio Station
Music on PBS: A History of Music Programming at a Community Radio Station Rochelle Lade (BArts Monash, MArts RMIT) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2021 Abstract This historical case study explores the programs broadcast by Melbourne community radio station PBS from 1979 to 2019 and the way programming decisions were made. PBS has always been an unplaylisted, specialist music station. Decisions about what music is played are made by individual program announcers according to their own tastes, not through algorithms or by applying audience research, music sales rankings or other formal quantitative methods. These decisions are also shaped by the station’s status as a licenced community radio broadcaster. This licence category requires community access and participation in the station’s operations. Data was gathered from archives, in‐depth interviews and a quantitative analysis of programs broadcast over the four decades since PBS was founded in 1976. Based on a Bourdieusian approach to the field, a range of cultural intermediaries are identified. These are people who made and influenced programming decisions, including announcers, program managers, station managers, Board members and the programming committee. Being progressive requires change. This research has found an inherent tension between the station’s values of cooperative decision‐making and the broadcasting of progressive music. Knowledge in the fields of community radio and music is advanced by exploring how cultural intermediaries at PBS made decisions to realise eth station’s goals of community access and participation. ii Acknowledgements To my supervisors, Jock Given and Ellie Rennie, and in the early phase of this research Aneta Podkalicka, I am extremely grateful to have been given your knowledge, wisdom and support. -
Griffith University Centre for Public Culture and Ideas
Submission 89 GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR PUBLIC CULTURE AND IDEAS TUNING IN TO COMMUNITY BROADCASTING SUBMISSION TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STANDING COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND THE ARTS 23 MARCH 2006 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Culture, Commitment, Community: Looking at the stations 2.1 Scope of the study 2.2 Key findings 2.2.1 Metropolitan and regional stations 2.2.2 Indigenous and ethnic stations 2.2.3 Training 3. Qualitative Audience Research Project, Australia Talks Back 3.1 Scope of the study 3.2 Preliminary Findings of Audience-Based Research 3.2.1 Connecting Communities 3.2.2 Local News and Information 3.2.3 Indigenous Audiences 3.2.4 Ethnic audiences 3.2.5 Community Television 4. Summary and Conclusions REFERENCES APPENDIX A: Schedule of completed metropolitan and regional audience focus groups, and community group interviews Meadows, Forde, Ewart, Foxwell 2 Griffith University Tuning in to community broadcasting 1. Introduction Since 1999, researchers from Griffith University have undertaken national research on Australia’s community broadcasting sector. This research has involved two national projects. The first project (1999-2001) was station-based and was designed to gather data on the sector’s stations and participants. The second study (2003- ), currently underway is an audience-based study which has gathered qualitative data on community broadcasting audiences. This audience study, Australia’s Community Broadcasting Audiences Talk Back, is designed to complement the quantitative study of community broadcasting audiences completed by McNair Ingenuity (2004) and also to complete the circle of community radio stations and their audiences initiated by the first Griffith University study. -
Australian Community Broadcasting Hosts a Quiet Revolution
Sounds like a whisper: Australian Community Broadcasting hosts a quiet revolution Author Foxwell-Norton, Kerrie, Ewart, Jacqueline, Forde, Susan, Meadows, Michael Published 2008 Journal Title Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture Copyright Statement © 2008 Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, University of Westminster, London. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/23018 Link to published version http://www.wmin.ac.uk/mad/page-880 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Sounds like a whisper: Australian Community Broadcasting hosts a quiet revolution Kerrie Foxwell, Jacqui Ewart, Susan Forde and Michael Meadows School of Arts Griffith University Keywords : Audiences, community radio, broadcasting, empowerment, democracy, public sphere. Abstract Recent research into the Australian community broadcasting sector has revealed a developing role for community radio, in particular, in reviving notions of democracy by enhancing public sphere engagement by audiences. This paper is drawn from the first national qualitative audience study of the sector undertaken by the authors and provides strong evidence to suggest listeners are challenging globalised views of the world. They see community radio as ‘theirs’ and the only media able to accurately reflect Australia’s cultural diversity. This is enabling a revival of public sphere activity in the face of restrictions on democracy following an upsurge in global terrorism. We argue that the community broadcasting sector in Australia is providing citizens with services largely ignored by commercial media and to some extent, the publicly-funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation Introduction It’s for us, about us (Focus Group, Roxby Downs ROX FM, 2005). -
Joint ENGO Submission on Nuclear Issues As They Relate to the Environmental Protection & Biodiversity Conservation Act Revie
Joint ENGO Submission on Nuclear Issues as they Relate to the Environmental Protection & Biodiversity Conservation Act Review 2020 Written by Mia Pepper, Jim Green, Dave Sweeney, David Noonan & Annica Schoo. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Summary of Recommendations ................................................................................................ 3 Uranium: ............................................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Power: ...................................................................................................................... 3 Other Matters: ...................................................................................................................... 4 Uranium Trigger – Matters of National Environmental Significance ........................................... 4 Australia’s uranium mine legacy ............................................................................................. 7 Mining Legacies ................................................................................................................... 12 In Situ Leach Mining: ........................................................................................................... 14 Regulating Uranium – Inquiries ............................................................................................ 15 Bureau d’audiences publiques sur -
Annual Report 1990-91 AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING TRIBUNAL
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING TRIBUNAL Annual Report 1990-91 AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING TRIBUNAL ANNUAL REPORT 1990-91 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal Sydney 1991 © Commonwealth of Australia ISSN 0728-8883 Design by Publications and Public Relations Branch, Australian Broadcasting Tribunal. Printed in Australia by Pirie Printers Sales Pty Ltd, Fyshwick, A.CT. 11 CONTENTS 1. Membership of the Tribunal 1 2. The Year in Review 5 3. Powers and Functions of the Tribunal 11 Responsible Minister 14 4. Licensing 15 Number and Type of Licences on Issue 17 Number of Licensing Inquiries 19 Bond Inquiry 19 Commercial Radio Licence Grant Inquiries 20 Supplementary Radio Grant 21 Joined Supplementary /Independent Grant Inquiries 22 Remote Licences 22 Public Radio Licence Grants 23 Licence renewals 27 Renewal of Licences with Conditions 27 Revocation/ Suspension/ Conditions Inquiries 28 Revocation of Licence Conditions 31 Consolidation of Licences 32 Surrender of the 6CI Licence 33 Allocation of Call Signs 33 Changes to the Constituent Documents of Licensees 35 5. Ownership and Control 37 Applications Received 39 Most Significant Inquiries 39 Extensions of Time to Comply with the Act 48 Appointment of Receivers 48 Uncompleted Inquiries 49 Contraventions Amounting To Offences 51 Licence Transfers 52 Uncompleted Inquiries 52 Operation of Service by Other than Licensee 53 Registered Lender and Loan Interest Inquiries 53 6. Program and Advertising Standards 55 Program and Advertising Standards 57 Australian Content (Radio and Television) 58 Compliance with Australian Content Television Standards 60 Children's and Preschool Children's Television Standards 60 Compliance with Children's Television Standards 63 Comments and Complaints 64 Broadcasting of Political Matter 65 Research 66 Ill 7. -
The Environmental Regulation of Mining: an International Comparison
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Southern Queensland ePrints The environmental regulation of mining: an international comparison by Noeleen McNamara B Com, LLB, LLM, ATCL A Dissertation submitted For the award of a Doctorate in Philosophy within the School of Law of the University of Southern Queensland 2009 CERTIFICATION OF DISSERTATION I certify that the ideas, experimental work, results, analyses, software and conclusions reported in this dissertation are entirely by own effort, except where otherwise acknowledged. I also certify that the work is original and has not been previously submitted for any other award, except where otherwise acknowledged. ……………………………………... ................................... Signature of Candidate Date ENDORSEMENT ……………………………………... ................................... Signature of Supervisor Date ……………………………………... ................................... Signature of Supervisor Date i ABSTRACT Over the past 15 years, significant sectors of the mining industry have undertaken the Global Mining Initiative. This was followed by an extensive program called the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development Project. These self regulatory mechanisms require 'beyond compliance' environmental behaviour, whether companies are operating in the developed or the developing world. Reviewing case studies of gold mines operated by the 'top tier' transnational mining companies in Queensland, Papua New Guinea and Tanzania, this thesis addresses whether these and other self regulatory mechanisms are more important than formal legislation in motivating compliance with environmental laws for these mining companies. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to sincerely thank and acknowledge the many hours spent by my Principal Supervisor, Associate Professor Geoff Cockfield in developing this thesis. Dr Cockfield‘s erudite comments and suggestions were of immense value. -
Australian Broadcasting Tribunal Annual Report 1981-82 Annual Report Australian Broadcasting Tribunal 1981-82
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING TRIBUNAL ANNUAL REPORT 1981-82 ANNUAL REPORT AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING TRIBUNAL 1981-82 Australian Government Publishing Service Canberra 1982 © Commonwealth of Australia 1982 ISSN 0728-606X Printed by Canberra Publishing & Printing Co .. Fyshwick. A.C.T. 2609 The Honourable the Minister for Communications In conformity with the provisions of section 28 of the Broadcasting and Television Act 1942, as amended, I have pleasure in presenting the Annual Report of the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal for the period l July 1981 to 30 June 1982. David Jones Chairman iii CONTENTS PART/ INTRODUCTION Page Legislation 1 Functions of the Tribunal 1 Membership of the Tribunal 1 Meetings of the Tribunal 2 Addresses given by Tribunal Members and Staff 2 Organisation and Staff of the Tribunal 4 Location of the Tribunal's Offices 4 Overseas Visits 5 Financial Accounts of the Tribunal 5 PART II GENERAL Broadcasting and Television Services in operation since 1953 6 Financial results - commercial broadcasting and television stations 7 Fees for licences for commercial broadcasting and television stations 10 Broadcasting and Televising of political matter 13 Political advertising 15 Administration of Section 116(4) of the Act 16 Complaints about programs and advertising 18 Appeals or reviews of Tribunal Decisions and actions by Commonwealth 20 Ombudsman, AdministrativeReview Council and Administrative Appeals Tribunal Reference of questions of law to the Federal Court of Australia pursuant 21 to Section 22B of the Act PART III PUBLIC INQUIRIES -
6 the Base-Load Electricity Fallacy 6 Obscenity of Carbon Trading 6 Defence Greenwash on War Games 6 Indigenous Owners Reject NT Waste Dump 6 Earth Sanctuaries
Chain Reaction The national magazine of Friends of the Earth Australia :: www.foe.org.au 100th issue 6 The base-load electricity fallacy 6 Obscenity of carbon trading 6 Defence greenwash on war games 6 Indigenous owners reject NT waste dump 6 Earth Sanctuaries Food Sovereignty Nano-Food vs Real Food Kokatha Mula World Water Day 100th issue NEWS & VIEWS Issue #100 - August 2007 It’s Time For Food Sovereignty Indigenous Owners Reject - Joel Catchlove 12 Nuclear Waste Dump Publisher - Natalie Wasley 35 Friends of the Earth Australia, World Forum For Food Sovereignty ABN 81600610421 Declaration 16 Munda Yumadoo Iliga - Leave The Chain Reaction Team Land As It Is Jim Green, Cam Walker, Joel Catchlove Nanotechnology And Agriculture - Breony Carbines & Simon Prideaux 38 In Food Production - Which Food Layout & Design Future? International Campaign To Natalie Lowrey - Georgia Miller 17 Abolish Nuclear Weapons [email protected] - Felicity Hill 40 Thanks to: Estelle Pham, Monica Haynes Famous Moments In FoE and Sophie Green for help with this edition. History - Exposing The Agua Viva! Live Water Thanks to the thousands of people who have Uranium Cartel In 1976 - Sam Cossar-Gilbert 41 helped with Chain Reaction from the first - Wieslaw Lichacz 20 edition to the 100th! 100 Editions Of BOOKS Printing Arena Printing and Publishing, Melbourne Chain Reaction 23 Free Market Missionaries Subscriptions The Base-load Electricty Fallacy Suiting Themselves, Sharon Beder Four issues: $A22 (within Australia) - Mark Diesendorf 26 summarises her two latest books. 43 Cheques, etc payable to Chain Reaction Earth Santuaries And The Failure Clive Hamilton’s Scorcher: The Dirty Politics of Climate Change 45 Subscription Enquiries Of Market-based Conservation Chain Reaction, - Jasmin Sydee & Sharon Beder 27 Paul Cleary’s Shakedown: Australia’s PO Box 222, Fitzroy, Vic, 3065, Australia. -
Indigenous Radio Stations
NATIONAL INDIGENOUS RADIO SERVICE / INDIGENOUS DEDICATED STATIONS ALL AGES INDIGENOUS 183 STATIONS NATIONALLY INGIGENOUS 4PEOPLEMEDIA IS AN AUTHORISED MEDIA MULTI- REPRESETATIVE FOR NIRS, WHO REPRESENT CULTURAL INDIGENOUS 183 INDIGENOUS RADIO STATIONS, NATIONALLY. NIRS is a national service, established as a hub station in Brisbane, to provide a news service and programs of interest to indigenous media organisations. INDIGENOUS RADIO STATIONS INDIGENOUS RADIO STATIONS Beagle Bay, WA 3UGE, Upper Goulburn, VIC 4AAA, Brisbane, QLD Bidyadanga (La Grange), WA Gippsland Community Radio, Gippsland, VIC 4C1M, Cairns, QLD Djarindjin/Lombadina, WA RPH National Office, 3RPH, Melbourne, VIC 4K1G, Townsville, QLD Jigalong, WA Southern Victorian Community Radio, Geelong, VIC 4MW, Thursday Island, QLD Kalumburu, WA Wangaratta Community Radio Assoc Inc, Wangaratta, 4UMS-FM, Cherbourg, QLD Looma, WA NT 4RR, Charleville, QLD One Arm Point, WA 8EAR, Nhulunbuy, NT Buralim Media, Bundaberg, QLD Oomburgurri, WA 5DDD, Adelaide, SA CQACM, 4US, Rockhampton, QLD Warmun (Turkey Creek), WA 5EBI, Adelaide, SA MOB-FM, Mt Isa, QLD Yandeeyarra (Mugarinya), WA 5UV, Adelaide, SA Radio 4TOF-FM, Cunnamulla, QLD Yiyili, WA KIX FM, Kangaroo Island, SA 2CUZ-FM, Bourke, NSW Yungngora (Noonkanbah), WA TRAX FM, Port Pirie, SA Gadigal Information Service, Sydney, NSW 6CCR, Perth, WA Goori Broadcasters of Radio Nambucca Inc, COMMUNITY STATIONS 7DBS, Wynyard, TAS Nambucca Heads, NSW 4CCR, Cairns, QLD 7THE, Tasmania, TAS MIBAAC, Taree, NSW 4CRM, Mackay, QLD 7LTN, Launceston, TAS -
Stopping the Australian Coal Export Boom
Stopping the Australian Coal Export Boom Funding proposal for the Australian anti-coal movement John Hepburn (Greenpeace Australia Pacific) Bob Burton (Coalswarm) Sam Hardy (Graeme Wood Foundation) Funding proposal for the Australian anti-coal movement November 2011 This proposal is based on extensive research into the Australian coal industry, made possible by the generous support of the Rockefeller Family Fund. The proposal consists of three parts: 1. An overview of the Australian Coal Export Boom 2. A strategy to disrupt the Australian Coal Boom 3. This campaign proposal Acknowledgements This proposal has been developed by John Hepburn (Greenpeace Australia Pacific), with significant assistance from Bob Burton (Coalswarm) and Sam Hardy (Graeme Wood Foundation). The strategy and this proposal have incorporated extensive input from participants of the first Australian National Coal Convergence, held in the Blue Mountains in October 2011. Particular thanks are due to Mark Ogge (Beyond Zero Emissions), Paul Oosting (Getup!), Ellie Smith, Holly Creenaune(United Voice), Barry Traill (Pew), Julie Macken (Greenpeace), Drew Hutton (Lock the Gate), Kirsty Ruddock (Environmental Defenders Office NSW), Jo Bragg (Environmental Defenders Office Queensland), Patricia Julien (Mackay Conservation Group), Carmel Flint (Nature Conservation Council), Chantelle James (Capricornia Conservation Council), Mark Wakeham (Environment Victoria), Kate Lee (United Voice), Geoff Evans (Mineral Policy Institute), Richard Denniss (The Australia Institute), Belinda Fletcher (Greenpeace) and Georgina Woods (CANA) for comment, critique and input on various drafts. Page 2 Funding proposal for the Australian anti-coal movement November 2011 1. Executive Summary The Need: The Proposal: Australia is on the verge of a coal boom that is unprecedented in • We are seeking investment to help us build a nation-wide coal both scale and speed campaign that functions like an orchestra, with a large number of different voices combining together into a powerful symphony. -
The Australian Movement Against Uranium Mining: Its Rationale and Evolution
THE AUSTRALIAN MOVEMENT AGAINST URANIUM MINING: ITS RATIONALE AND EVOLUTION Marty Branagan Lecturer in Peace Studies University of New England, Australia This paper begins with a brief historical overview of the Australian movement against urani- um mining, before focussing on two major campaigns: Roxby and Jabiluka. It describes the reasons the activists gave at the time for their blockades of the Roxby Downs uranium mine in South Australia in 1983 and 1984. These reasons – such as perceptions that the industry is unsafe - have changed little over time and were the basis for the campaign against the pro- posed Jabiluka mine in the Northern Territory in 1998. They continue to be cited by environmental groups and Aboriginal Traditional Owners to this day as new situations arise, such as the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. The paper then describes how the movement evolved between the Roxby and Jabiluka block- ades, with changes to the movement’s philosophy, strategy, tactics and internal dynamics. This analysis includes a comparison between two anti-nuclear bike rides, one a year after the 1984 Roxby blockade and involving some of the same activists, and another at the time of the Jabiluka blockade. This author was present at all these events, and provides an emic (in- sider) perspective within a longitudinal participant-observation methodology. Although this perspective obviously has a subjective element, the paper fills a gap in that there is little written history of these blockades (particularly Roxby) and more generally of Australian re- sistance to uranium mining, let alone the aspects of nonviolence and movement evolution.