American Airlines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Airlines Global Community Global Commitment 2008 Corporate Responsibility Report Prepared by AMR Corporation About This Document AMR’s commitment to sustainability includes responsible production of this document. Its horizontal format is designed for easier on-screen viewing. We have endeavored to embed hot links within the report to previous reports and other digital resources outside this document to increase its value to readers and avoid unnecessary duplication. Please print it only if necessary. 1 AMR Corporation • Corporate Responsibility Report Dear Friends of AMR Corporation: For more than 80 years, through good times and bad, AMR Corporation (AMR) has sustained its position as one of the world’s leading airlines. We have not done it alone. Our success has been built on the support of our customers, employees, shareholders, and the communities we serve and call home. In turn, we have done our best to make AMR a good place to work, a good neighbor, a positive contributor to the economy, and a reasonable investment. The theme of this year’s corporate responsibility report is commitment. The report aims to provide a clear picture of AMR’s commitment to being a responsible corporation and describe the steps AMR is taking to meet the commitments made to the company’s many constituencies. The report also highlights how AMR’s employees demonstrate genuine care and citizenship in communities around the world beyond compliance with government rules and regulations. This year’s report has been enhanced in two important ways. First, it contains much more information than last year’s report, in keeping with AMR’s commitment to communicate with employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and investors. Second, the report provides more examples of AMR employees volunteering their time and talent to bring the value of these activities to life. The choices AMR makes will always be driven by the values and aspirations that have sustained the company for more than 80 years. We are committed to improving our performance each and every year. I encourage you to chart our progress in the years to come. Gerard Arpey1 Chairman, President, and CEO AMR Corporation and American Airlines 1GRI standard disclosure 1.1 Global Community • Global Commitment 2 3 AMR Corporation • Corporate Responsibility Report Contents 02 Letter from the CEO 05 About This Report 07 Our Global Committment 11 Governance 21 Focus on Safety 29 Focus on Environment 47 Focus on Employees 53 Focus on Diversity 63 Focus on Communities 73 Focus on Reliability and Customer Service 79 Appendix A: GRI Index 83 Appendix B: Greenhouse Gas Methodology 88 Appendix C: Fleet Inventory Global Community • Global Commitment 4 About This Report2 This report is our first corporate responsibility report (CRR) and represents our efforts to expand the scope of our reporting to include more in-depth social and economic aspects of AMR Corporation (AMR). Close followers of AMR will note this was one goal set forth in our 2007 environmental responsibility report (ERR). We are happy to have achieved that goal and present this CRR, our first fully integrated record of corporate citizenship, economic impact, and environmental performance. This CRR is for calendar year 2008. This report has been completed to meet the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Level C reporting requirements for AMR, the parent company of American Airlines (American) and its regional affiliate, American Eagle (Eagle). Unless otherwise specified, any reference to AMR indicates that the subject material applies broadly to both airlines. Where constraints associated with data collection have limited our reporting ability in select areas, we have estimated relevant values or included statements indicating whether we believe the incomplete measurements are material. 2GRI standard disclosure 3.1-3.8, 3.10-3.11, 4.14-4.15 5 AMR Corporation • Corporate Responsibility Report This report is organized to provide a broad overview of AMR’s corporate responsibility efforts. In the first section we provide a brief profile of AMR and our commitment to responsible corporate behavior. This is followed by a thorough description of our corporate governance policies. The remaining sections address key business issues: safety, environment, employment, diversity, community, and reliability. Many of our readers will be interested to know the type and scope of community involvement, volunteerism, and general philanthropy in which we and our employees participate. To provide some insight into this part of our culture, we have included a small description of select activities at the end of each major section. We continued our efforts to engage our stakeholders during the production of this CRR to ensure and enhance transparency. Internally, the participation of our departments and business units continues to expand. Externally, we continued our collaboration with our Ceres stakeholder advisory team introduced in our 2007 ERR. We sincerely thank each of these individuals. Their efforts continue to enhance our ability to report and the quality of the information. AMR’s commitment to corporate responsibility includes environmentally sensible production of this document. Its horizontal format is designed for easier on-screen viewing. We hope that for most readers this will eliminate the need to print this report. With this CRR, we reaffirm our commitment to produce a CRR annually. Our goals for future reports will include evaluating increased use of hyperlinks to previous reports and other digital resources to increase its value to readers and eliminate the duplication of information easily obtained elsewhere. We welcome feedback regarding our corporate responsibility efforts and this report. For more information about this report, please contact Mr. Tom Opderbeck at [email protected]. Global Community • Global Commitment 6 Our Global Commitment3 The history of AMR can be traced back to 1929. Today, American is a global airline with service to more than 250 cities in 50 countries, and we take pride in bringing people together. Based in Fort Worth, Texas, AMR’s operations are almost entirely within the airline industry. The company carries over 100 million passengers and transports more than a half million tons of cargo annually. In addition, American is a founding member of the oneworld Alliance®. A complete organizational profile is available atwww.aa.com/aa/i18nForward.do?p=/ amrcorp/newsroom/amr-corporation.jsp and is included in our annual report filed each year with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Corporate responsibility has different meanings for many organizations. At AMR, we view it as our responsibility to do our part to influence global solutions for the benefit of generations to come. The scale of our operations affords us the opportunity to affect positive change around the world. We appreciate this opportunity and take pride in employing practices that positively impact our commitment to diversity, corporate citizenship, and environmental performance — the major platforms of our corporate responsibility program. Like any natural system, these platforms are deeply connected and do not stop at national or continental boundaries. For this reason, AMR’s global commitment to corporate responsibility touches every department in every corner of our global organization and every aspect of our business. 3GRI standard disclosure 2.1-2.9 7 AMR Corporation • Corporate Responsibility Report Although the airline industry is a complex and changing industry, we have always believed that our responsibility to employees is to: • Provide competitive pay and benefits • Ensure a respectful and safe work environment • Embrace diversity and promote inclusiveness • Extend opportunities for career growth and development Our customers’ needs can be simply expressed: • Be safe and secure • Arrive at destinations on schedule • Receive bags and cargo on schedule and in the expected condition • Interact along the way with competent, caring, and pleasant individuals We strive to make a positive contribution to the many communities we serve around the world by: • Connecting developing and mature markets • Providing high-quality employment opportunities • Protecting environmental resources • Supporting local and regional economies • Sharing our time, talent, and other resources with local non-profit organizations Our long-standing and global commitment to diversity, environmental responsibility, and ethical business practices is fundamental to our operations. It is also a key to our sustained success and why our employees, customers, and communities place their trust in AMR. We understand that practicing corporate responsibility is not always easy. Compromise is sometimes required. But when done right, sustainable practices create a new sense of optimism and belief that economic success and corporate responsibility are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, these practices provide a more hopeful and constructive way to organize our business activities that inspire and motivate others to embrace a new outlook in diversity, corporate citizenship, and environmental performance. Global Community • Global Commitment 8 AMR Global Corporate Responsibility Statement As a global airline carrying more than 100 million passengers and more than practices takes many forms — from ethical governance to our commitment to 500,000 tons of cargo a year, AMR promotes commerce, trade, and economic diversity and inclusion, to our focus on safety, the environment, and giving back to
Recommended publications
  • AMR Corporation
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Commission file number 1-8400. AMR Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 75-1825172 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) of incorporation or organization) 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (817) 963-1234 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered Common stock, $1 par value per share New York Stock Exchange 9.00% Debentures due 2016 New York Stock Exchange 7.875% Public Income Notes due 2039 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No o. Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Jay-Z Adds Second Brooklyn Show to the 4:44 Tour Due to Overwhelming Demand
    JAY-Z ADDS SECOND BROOKLYN SHOW TO THE 4:44 TOUR DUE TO OVERWHELMING DEMAND WHO: JAY-Z WHAT: Additional Brooklyn date for the 4:44 TOUR WHEN: November 27th, 2017 HOW: Continuing its commitment to bring fans closer to their favorite artists, TIDAL members will have access to a special presale beginning on Tuesday, July 11th at 12pm ET. Members can find details for purchasing tickets at Sprint.TIDAL.com. Citi® is the official presale credit card for the 4:44 TOUR. As such, Citi® cardmembers will have access to purchase U.S. presale tickets beginning Tuesday, July 11th at 12pm ET until Thursday, July 13th at 10:00pm ET through Citi’s Private Pass® program. For complete presale details visit www.citiprivatepass.com. Tickets for the 4:44 TOUR go on sale to the general public starting Friday, July 14th at 10am local time at livenation.com. VIP Packages are available at VIPNation.com. WHERE: See below dates. 4:44 TOUR ITINERARY Friday, October 27 Anaheim, CA Honda Center Saturday, October 28 Las Vegas, NV T-Mobile Arena Wednesday, November 1 Fresno, CA Save Mart Center at Fresno State Friday, November 3 Phoenix, AZ Talking Stick Resort Arena Sunday, November 5 Denver, CO Pepsi Center Arena Tuesday, November 7 Dallas, TX American Airlines Center Wednesday, November 8 Houston, TX Toyota Center Thursday, November 9 New Orleans, LA Smoothie King Center Saturday, November 11 Orlando, FL Amway Center Sunday, November 12 Miami, FL American Airlines Arena Tuesday, November 14 Atlanta, GA Philips Arena Wednesday, November 15 Nashville, TN Bridgestone
    [Show full text]
  • National Basketball Association
    Appendix 2 to Sports Facility Reports, Volume 5, Number 2 ( Copyright 2005, National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School) NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION Note: Information compiled from Forbes Magazine (franchise values), Lexis.com, Sports Business Journal, and other sources published on or before January12, 2005. Team Principal Owner Recent Purchase Current Value ($/Mil) Price ($/Mil) (Percent Increase/Decrease From Last Year) Atlanta Hawks Atlanta Spirit, LLC $250 (2004) $232 (+15%) includes Atlanta Hawks, Atlanta Thrashers (NHL), and operating rights in Philips Arena Arena ETA COST % FACILITY FINANCING (millions) Publicly Financed Philips Arena 1999 $213.5 91% The facility was financed through $149.5 M in taxable revenue bonds that will be paid back through stadium revenues. A new 3% car rental tax pays for $62 M of the public infrastructure costs and Time Warner contributed $20 M for the remaining infrastructure costs. UPDATE The purchase of the Hawks, Atlanta Thrashers (NHL) franchise, and operating rights in Philips Arena to the Atlanta Spirit, Inc. was finalized in March 2004. A recently reported investor with a 1% share in the franchise is Atlanta Hawks legend Dominique Wilkins. NAMING RIGHTS Philips Electronics is paying $185 million over 20 years for the naming rights that expire in 2019. Team Principal Owner Recent Purchase Current Value ($/Mil) Price ($/Mil) (Percent Increase/Decrease From Last Year) Boston Celtics Boston Basketball $360 (2002) $290 (+6%) Partners LP, a group made up of Wycliffe Grousbeck, H. Irving Grousbeck and Stephen Pagliuca. Arena ETA COST % FACILITY FINANCING (millions) Publicly Financed FleetCenter 1995 $160 0% Privately financed and owned by the NHL’s Bruins.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverine Interests, Llc
    WOLVERINE INTERESTS, LLC Wolverine Interests is a Dallas, Texas based Commercial Real Estate Investment Firm led by industry veterans with a deep understanding of complex financing, master development and management expertise. Wolverine specializes in: • Mixed-Use Developments • Office Developments • Multi-Family Developments • Single Tenant Properties • Office Acquisition/Disposition • Complex Financing • Tenant Representation MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS Wolverine Interests specializes in office, multi-family, and master planned mixed-use developments. Over the past 40 years, our partners have developed over 8,000 multi-family units, 8 large office buildings, and master planned 3 comprehensive mixed-use projects in the DFW metroplex. Wolverine assembles the capital stack for the project in accordance to the investment strategy of the investors. From there, we facilitate the entire development process from architectural plans, to land purchase, through construction management and lease-up, to asset management. Wolverine’s success stems from our vision to create communities that provide optimal live/work/play experiences for the end user. FRISCO SQUARE - 60 ACRES Frisco Square is similar to a European village; a pedestrian-friendly urban environment in Frisco, Texas. Designed by David M. Schwartz; whose work includes the American Airlines Center in Dallas, the Ballpark in Arlington, and the Bass Performance Hall in Fort Worth; along with O’Brein, Boka & Powell whose notable work includes The Star in Frisco. The development encompasses office, retail, multi-family and municipal product located on over 60 acres in one of fastest growing cities in the United States. Located right off the Dallas North Tollway and across the street south of Toyota Stadium; home of FC Dallas soccer club.
    [Show full text]
  • US and Plaintiff States V. US Airways Group, Inc. and AMR Corporation
    Case 1:13-cv-01236-CKK Document 170 Filed 04/25/14 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:13-cv-01236 (CKK) US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and AMR CORPORATION Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT WHEREAS, Plaintiffs United States of America ("United States") and the States of Arizona, Florida, Tennessee and Michigan, the Commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia ("Plaintiff States") filed their Complaint against Defendants US Airways Group, Inc. ("US Airways") and AMR Corporation ("American") on August 13, 2013, as amended on September 5, 2013; AND WHEREAS, the United States and the Plaintiff States and Defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of fact or law; AND WHEREAS, Defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of the Final Judgment pending its approval by the Court; 1 Case 1:13-cv-01236-CKK Document 170 Filed 04/25/14 Page 2 of 28 AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt and certain divestiture of certain rights or assets by the Defendants to assure that competition is not substantially lessened; AND WHEREAS, the Final Judgment requires Defendants to make certain divestitures for the purposes of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint; AND WHEREAS, Defendants have represented to the United States and the Plaintiff States that the divestitures required below can and will be made, and that the Defendants will later raise no claim of hardship or difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the provisions below; NOW THEREFORE, before any testimony is taken, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: I.
    [Show full text]
  • Reno – Stead Airport
    Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority FY 2017-18 ANNUAL BUDGET Table of Contents SECTION 1 – Introduction and Summary Airport System Overview. ......................................................................................... 1-2 National and Regional Economic Outlook. ............................................................. 2-13 Air Service Market Update. ................................................................................... 13-17 Air Cargo Update. .................................................................................................. 17-19 Operating Environment. ........................................................................................ 19-29 Budget Process. ..................................................................................................... 29-30 Revenue Bond Resolution .......................................................................................... 30 Planning for the Future .......................................................................................... 30-32 Budget Document Structure ....................................................................................... 32 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 32-33 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... 33 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ................................................................. 34 SECTION 2 – Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Regulations Commissioners
    Airport Commission City and County of San Francisco Edwin M. Lee Mayor Rules and Regulations Commissioners: Larry Mazzola President San Francisco International Airport Linda S. Crayton Vice President Adopted: March 15, 2016 Eleanor Johns Issued by: The Airport Commission Richard J. City and County of San Francisco Guggenhime Peter A. Stern John L. Martin Director CityandCountyofSanFrancisco AirportCommissionRulesandRegulations AIRPORT COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO EDWIN M. LEE MAYOR COMMISSIONERS LARRY MAZZOLA PRESIDENT LINDA S. CRAYTON VICE PRESIDENT ELEANOR JOHNS RICHARD J. GUGGENHIME PETER A. STERN CityandCountyofSanFrancisco AirportCommissionRulesandRegulations FOREWORD The statements contained herein express the policy of the San Francisco Airport Commission, duly adopted as the Rules and Regulations, and are intended to ensure the safe and efficient operations of San Francisco International Airport. These Rules and Regulations govern the general conduct of the public, tenants, employees, and commercial users of San Francisco International Airport as their activities relate to the possession, management, supervision, operation and control of San Francisco International Airport by the City through its Airport Commission. JOHN L. MARTIN AIRPORT DIRECTOR City and County of San Francisco Airport Commission Rules and Regulations TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule .....................................................................................................................Page RULE 1.0 DEFINITIONS....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Agency
    Booking Options The Economy, Premium Economy, Business and First class booking options all offer the same level Travel of flexibility. The PlanAhead Economy option is less flexible, but offers a discount of 25% off of the Economy rate. Booking Advance Purchase Agency Cabin Fees Inventory Requirement Economy Y No No Premium Economy W No No If you have questions, please contact AirPass Customer Service at (800) 433-6355 (option 1) Business J No No or [email protected] 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. CT, Monday – Friday. First F No No For more information, PlanAhead Economy H Yes, 7-day No please visit airpass.com. Instant Upgrade Fares Instant upgrade fares are offered in select markets, giving members an opportunity to travel in the next higher cabin at the lower cabin rate. These fares are often subject to fare rules like restricted inventories (A, D, I, or R), round-trip booking requirements, and specific point of origin requirements so each market will be unique. AAdvantage® Upgrades Members may upgrade their AirPass bookings via normal AAdvantage upgrade procedures using 500-mile, systemwide or mileage upgrade awards. Ticketing AirPass reservations can only be ticketed by American, so queueing is required. Formats Notes Sabre QP/XTM74/11 • American will queue the reservation back to the agency’s #14 queue. • Sabre agencies will see the following in the PNR after ticketing: H-ADTK/AAIRPASS TKT NBR 0012199999999 Apollo @:3SSR OTHS AA NN1/AAIRPASS • American will send the ticket number via teletype to the agency. Worldspan 3SSR OTHS AA NN1/AAIRPASS • Non-Sabre agencies will see the following in the PNR after Amadeus SROTHSAA-AAIRPASS ticketing: H-AAIRPASS TKT NBR SENT VIA TELETYPE Galileo V.AAA*AAIRPASS Once queued, tickets will be issued 24 hours prior to departure.
    [Show full text]
  • A Two-Door Airplane Boarding Approach When Using Apron Buses
    sustainability Article A Two-Door Airplane Boarding Approach When Using Apron Buses Camelia Delcea * , Liviu-Adrian Cotfas , Nora Chirit,ă and Ionut, Nica Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010522 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected] (L.-A.C.); [email protected] (N.C.); [email protected] (I.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-769-652-813 Received: 3 September 2018; Accepted: 8 October 2018; Published: 10 October 2018 Abstract: Boarding is one of the major processes of airplane turnaround time, with a direct influence on the airline companies’ costs. From a sustainable point of view, a faster completion of the boarding process has impact not only on the airline company’s long-term performance, but also on customers’ satisfaction and on the airport’s possibility of offering more services without additional investments in new infrastructure. Considering the airplane boarding strategies literature, it can be observed that the latest papers are dealing with developing faster boarding strategies, most of them considering boarding using just one-door of the aircraft. Even though boarding on one-door might be feasible for the airports having the needed infrastructure and sufficient jet-bridges, the situation is different in European airports, as the use of apron buses is fairly common. Moreover, some of the airline companies have adapted their boarding pass in order to reflect which door one should board once they get down from the bus. While using these buses, the boarding strategies developed in the literature are hard to find their applicability. Thus, a new method for boarding on two-door airplanes when apron buses are used is proposed and tested against the actual boarding method.
    [Show full text]
  • Flights (Flights Which Have Not Been Canceled) That Qualify for a Refund Must Be Processed by American Airlines Via the Online Refund Request Form
    Schedule Change Introduction General Information Schedule Change-Rule 240/80 or Schedule Irregularity for delayed flights (flights which have not been canceled) that qualify for a refund must be processed by American Airlines via the online refund request form. Travel agents may not process a refund for a non-refundable ticket on a Rule 240/80 for delayed flights (flights which have not been canceled) via their ARC/BSP. If customer requests a refund refer to the Revenue/'Published Fare online Refund Request Form section below. Definitions: Rule 240 Domestic tariff rules which state AA's obligations to our customers when their flights are changed or canceled as a result of Schedule Change(s)/ Irregularities. Rule 240 applies to travel wholly within the 50 U.S., travel between the U.S. and Canada and travel between the U.S. and Puerto Rico /U.S. Virgin Islands. Rule 240 protects all ticketed customers including AAdvantage, AA codeshare and Travel Agents free/reduced rate. AAirpass® tickets should be handled in the same manner as revenue tickets and are considered ticketed at all times. Rule 80 International tariff rules which state AA's obligations to our customers when their flights are changed or canceled as a result of Schedule Change(s)/Irregularities. Rule 80 applies to all international travel except travel between the U.S. and Canada and/or between the U.S. and Puerto Rico /U.S. Virgin Islands. Rule 80 protects all ticketed customers including AAdvantage, AA codeshare and Travel Agents free/reduced rate. AAirpass® tickets should be handled in the same manner as revenue tickets and are considered ticketed at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Terminal Beacons Recommended Practice
    Airport Terminal Beacons Recommended Practice Page | 1 1.0 Table of Contents 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 4 3.0 BACKGROUND OF AIRPORT TERMINAL BEACONS ......................... 4 4.0 TECHNOLOGY DISCUSSION .................................................................. 6 4.1. What is an Airport Terminal Beacon? ............................................................................... 6 4.2. Building Beacon Business Models .................................................................................... 7 4.2.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 7 4.2.2. Overview .............................................................................................................................. 7 4.2.3. Impact on Technology Deployment .................................................................................. 8 4.2.4. Building the Business Case ............................................................................................... 8 4.2.5. Options for Implementation ............................................................................................... 8 4.2.6. Recommendation ................................................................................................................ 8 4.2.7. Implementation Approach .................................................................................................. 9 4.3. Common Use
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Number of Passengers for Each of Three Reverse Pyramid Boarding Groups with COVID-19 Flying Restrictions
    S S symmetry Article Determining the Number of Passengers for Each of Three Reverse Pyramid Boarding Groups with COVID-19 Flying Restrictions Camelia Delcea 1 , R. John Milne 2 and Liviu-Adrian Cotfas 1,* 1 Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected] 2 David D. Reh School of Business, Clarkson University, 333 B.H. Snell Hall, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-771-269-599 Received: 5 November 2020; Accepted: 4 December 2020; Published: 9 December 2020 Abstract: The onset of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 has changed many aspects of people’s economic and social activities. For many airlines, social distancing has reduced airplane capacity by one third as a result of keeping the middle seats empty. Additionally, social distancing between passengers traversing the aisle slows the boarding process. Recent literature has suggested that the reverse pyramid boarding method provides favorable values for boarding time and passenger health metrics when compared to other boarding methods with social distancing. Assuming reverse pyramid boarding with the middle seats unoccupied, we determined the number of passengers to include in each of three boarding groups. We assumed that passengers use a jet-bridge that connects the airport terminal to the airplane’s front door. We used agent-based modeling and a stochastic simulation to evaluate solutions. A full grid search found an initial good solution, and then local search optimization determined the best solution based upon the airline’s relative preference for minimizing average boarding time and minimizing risks to previously seated passengers from later-boarding, potentially contagious passengers breathing near them.
    [Show full text]