Cleveland Innerbelt Corridor Study Alternative Concepts Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cleveland Innerbelt Corridor Study Alternative Concepts Table of Contents CLEVELAND& HINNERBELonlo ulr*" lwt- Cleveland Innerbelt Corridor Study Alternative Concepts Table of Contents Introduction Draft Purpose and Need Rehabilitation/ReconstructionConcept TransitIHOV Concept ITSITSM Concept Downtown Portal A Concept Downtown Portal B Concept Frontage Road Concept University Circle Access Boulevard Concept University Circle Access Freeway Concept herbelt Boulevard Concept Flats Connector Component CLEVELAND INNERBELT STUDY ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTS REVISIONS (Changes from 11/08/01 document) REHABILITATION / RECONSTRUCTION CONCEPT Removal of rehabilitatiodreplacement of the Shoreway pavements and bridges from West 3rd Street and extending east along the Shoreway to Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard. The rehabilitatiodreplacement of these Shoreway pavements and bridges will be undertaken as part of the Cleveland Lakefiont Study. TRANSITJHOV CONCEPT Deletion of 1-90 (Shoreway) HOV component. This component will be evaluated by the Cleveland Lakefiont Study. Deletion of East 55" Street Park and Ride facility. Relocation of proposed 1-77 Park and Ride facilities to 1-77 and the Ohio Turnpike and 1-77 at State Route 82. Deletion of proposed West 25thStreet HOV lane and corresponding express bus service. Deletion of proposed 1-77 HOV lane. ITSITSM CONCEPT (Intelligent Transportation System/Transportation System Management) No changes. / - DOWNTOWN PORTAL A CONCEPT Area encompassing widening of 1-77 (reference number 4 on map) has been reduced to area just inside I-77lI-490 interchange area. DOWNTOWN PORTAL B CONCEPT Area encompassing widening of 1-77 (reference number 4 on map) has been reduced to area just inside I-77lI-490 interchange area The interchanges at East 72nd Street and Martin Luther King on 1-90 near Gordon Park are removed from consideration as part of the Downtown Portal B concept. The possible reconfiguration of these interchanges will be undertaken as part of the Cleveland Lakefront Study. FRONTAGE ROAD SYSTEM CONCEPT Area encompassing widening of 1-77 (reference number 4 on map) has been reduced to area just inside I-77lI-490 interchange area. The interchanges at East 72ndStreet and Martin Luther King on 1-90 near Gordon Park are removed fiom consideration as part of the Downtown Portal B concept. The possible reconfiguration of these interchanges will be undertaken as part of the Cleveland Lakefiont Study. Improvements to the West 7" Streen-490 interchange removed as a component of the Flats Connector. In place of these interchange improvements, a new, low-level river crossing is proposed just to the north of the old Jefferson Avenue crossing. DRAFT 5/09/02 COLLECTOR-DISTRIBUTOR SYSTEM CONCEPT Concept removed fiom consideration as an alternative due to findings of Geometric Review. UNIVERSITY CIRCLE ACCESS (UCA) BOULEVARD CONCEPT Area encompassing widening of 1-77 (reference number 4 on map) has been reduced to area just inside I-77A-490 interchange area. Removal of improvements to the I-77Noodland Avenuelorange Avenue interchange and removal of improvements to the Ontario/Woodland/OrangeiBroadway Boulevard. Removal of the UCA Boulevard alignment that was originally shown utilizing the East 55Ih and Woodland Avenue comdor. Addition of a UCA Boulevard alignment through an existing brownfield. UNIVERSITY CIRCLE ACCESS (UCA) FREEWAY CONCEPT Area encompassing widening of 1-77 (reference number 4 on map) has been reduced to area just inside I-77A-490 interchange area. Removal of improvements to the I-77Noodland AvenueIOrange Avenue interchange and removal of improvements to the Ontario/Woodland~Orange/Broadway Boulevard. Reduction of the number of proposed interchanges along the new 1-490 alignment fiom 8 to 5 to satis@ minimum interchange spacing requirements. , INNERBELT BOULEVARD CONCEPT Reduction of the number of proposed interchanges along the new 1-490 alignment fiom 8 to 5 to satis@ minimum interchange spacing requirements. F'LATS CONNECTOR Addition of a second Flats Connector alignment. In this second alignment, improvements to the West 7" Streeta-490 interchange removed as a component of the Flats Connector. In place of these interchange improvements, a new, low-level river crossing is proposed just to the north of the old Jefferson Avenue crossing. DRAFT CLEVELAND INNERBELT STUDY ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTS Introduction The Cleveland Innerbelt Study has been undertaken by the Ohio Department of Transportation for the purpose of developing a strategy for the intelligent renewal of the transportation infrastructure in the I-71A-90conidor through downtown Cleveland. The pavements and structures comprising the Innerbelt fieeway system through Cleveland are approaching the end of their useful life and are in need of extensive rehabilitation and reconstruction. Additionally, the Innerbelt system is plagued by a series of capacity bottlenecks and locations not meeting present day highway design standards, which contribute to peak hour traffic congestion, high accident rates, and traffic diversions through central city neighborhoods, which degrades the quality of life for Cleveland residents. This study seeks to address the problems outlined in the Draft Purpose and Need Statement (summary included herein) through development of an overall strategy, or master plan, for the redevelopment of the transportation system in the corridor. It is anticipated that in 2007 ODOT will initiate construction of a sequence of projects that will comprise the overall strategy. i The current development of the Alternative Concepts is a major step in the preparation of the strategy. In this phase of the project the ODOT Study Team is outlining the initial set of concepts to be evaluated and refined in an ongoing development process to arrive at the final preferred strategy or plan. The concepts outlined in this brochure have been developed to address the problems outlined in the Draft Purpose and Need. They represent multimodal alternatives that could be undertaken, individually or in concert with one and other to meet the needs of the corridor. In this phase of the process, the concepts are being developed and refined with the assistance of the Cleveland community. ODOT is holding an ongoing series of meetings with the public to gather input and ideas to refine the concepts. The concepts presented in this brochure are, in fact, refinements of earlier concepts presented initially in October 2001. This refinement process will continue through January 2002. In January, the Study Team will begin to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness and impacts of these concepts. This will be done based on an established set of performance measures, or evaluation criteria. Based on this evaluation, the best concepts will be selected, including combinations of the concepts shown here, and refined further for more detailed scrutiny and impact assessment and eventually will be developed into the final improvement strategy. Please take this opportunity to review and comment on the alternative concepts contained in this document. Your input does matter and your voice will be heard. DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Cleveland Innerbelt is a high capacity, limited access highway extending from Cleveland's West 25' Street on the west side of the Cuyahoga River, across the valley and around the southern and eastern edges of downtown to the City's lakefront district at Burke Lakefront Airport. Combined with other portions of the interstate network in Cuyahoga makes Cleveland a major crossroads for commerce. 1.1 Project History - Ground was broken for the original Viaduct Bridge in May of 1887. In January of 1941, 53 years after it's opening, the Central Viaduct was condemned and closed to traffic. The steel trusses that carried traffic into the city were converted into scrap during World War II. After the Central Viaduct was closed, nearly twenty years went by before another bridge was built on the right- of-way. The entrance and exit ramps from this freeway would form the "Central Interchange," which would provide efficient capacity for downtown traffic with the completion of the proposed radial freeways. Today the bridge cames over 160,000 vehicles per day and has met the long range plans that the city originally had in mind for it, but Cleveland's current traffic needs have surpassed what the bridge can accommodate. This major investment study was initiated, 41 years after the bridge opened, to find solutions to the city's current traffic problems. 1.2 Study Area Description The Innerbelt begins just west of the 1-71 and West 25" Street interchange and proceeds north along 1-71 past the merger with State Route (SR) 156 (Jennings Freeway) to the I-71L-90/I-490 interchange where 1-71 ends. From this point, the Innerbelt proceeds east along 1-90, over the Central Viaduct bridge, and continues north along the eastern edge of downtown Cleveland in a depressed section of freeway, through the Innerbelt Curve to where it merges with SR 2 (the Shoreway). The Innerbelt includes all of the freeway ramp connections with the local street system as well as interstates and state routes. The Innerbelt Corridor refers to the freeway facilities described above as well as the freeway and surface street network that feeds the Jnnerbelt. 2.0 DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED The purpose of this study is to develop a strategy for the intelligent renewal of the transportation infrastructure within the Innerbelt Corridor. The majority of this infrastructure was constructed over a ten-year period that began in the late 1950's. This corridor has endured nearly forty years of traffic and an equal number of Northeast Ohio winters. As a result, the Innerbelt Comdor is not designed to today's standards and is in need of substantial rehabilitation. Consequently, the purpose of the proposed project is to: Undertake a major rehabilitation of bridge decks and pavements. Enhance the roadway capacity through the corridor to address the projected traffic volumes in the design year 2025. Develop improvements to the Innerbelt Corridor that will increase the level of motorist safety. Improve the existing highway interchanges to meet current design standards. Eliminate substandard weave sections at entrancelexit ramps to the Innerbelt.
Recommended publications
  • Operations Division
    OPERATIONS DIVISION MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Operations Division is to provide safe, reliable, clean, and courteous transportation services throughout the RTA’s service area in accordance with the service policies and financial plans adopted by the Authority. DIVISION OVERVIEW The Operations Division provides special ADA Paratransit and scheduled fixed route bus and rail transportation services to the general public and is responsible for maintenance of all vehicles, equipment, and properties. The Division is also responsible for security and transit police services. The Operations Division supports various Vital Few Objectives (VFOs) in the focus areas of Voice of Customer and Continual Process Improvement. A variety of teams are leading efforts, projects, and Change Initiatives to Enhance Customer Experience, Increase Service Efficiency, and Achieve a State of Good Repair. The Operations Division is a key supporter of the VFO to Achieve a Safety Culture. Relevant Scorecard Measures include On‐Time Performance, Ridership, Average Cost per Paratransit Trip, Miles between Service Interruption. 2018 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Improved the cost‐effectiveness of fixed‐route service to meet budget goals. Streamlined both rail replacement bus routes (#66R for Red Line and #67R for Blue/Green/Waterfront Line). Instituted new Fare Enforcement deployment strategies. Decreased overall Part 1 serious crime rates for 4th consecutive year. Selected vendors and kicked off the Radio Replacement project. Executed Lyft pilot program for supplemental paratransit service. Executed a pilot and review of Apollo Video Technology’s latest 4K HD video recording system and software with cellular access to the DVR. 2019 PRIORITIES Division‐wide focus on enhancing Customer Experience by providing exemplary customer service and reliable, on‐ time bus and rail service for RTA customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Assessment of the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Heavy Rail Transit 6
    UMTA-MA-06-0025-78-12 , A37 SE ASSESSMENT OF THE GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL no . 00T- TRANSIT AUTHORITY HEAVY RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEM T3C- R. Spencer UMTa- E. Hi nterkeuser 78 -44 The Boeing Vertol Company P.O. Box 16858 DEPARTMENT OF Philadelphia, PA 19142 TRANSPORTATION MAR l 3 1979 LIBRARY i -t OF TR4.„ OCTOBER 1978 v/ INTERIM REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U.S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . / 0FFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT Office of Rail and Construction Technology Washinaton DC 20590 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. HE Technical Report D ocumcntation Page Accession 3. Recipient’s Cofolog No. M7 1 . R eport No. 2. Government Nc. n UMTA-MA- 06- 0025-78-12 DifT- 4. Title ond Subtitle 5. Report Date October 1978 Noise Assessment of the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Heavy Rail Transit 6. Performing Organization Code 8-2791 ''i System 8. Performing Organization Report No. i /. Author's! R. H. Spencer and E. G. Hinterkeuser DOT-TSC-UMTA- 78-44 I 9. Performing Organization Name ond Address 10. Work Um r No. (TRAIS) The Boeing Vertol Company R97 4 3/UM9 4 9 P.0.
    [Show full text]
  • A Downloadable
    GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 2020 BUDGET PLAN PRESIDENT – BOARD OF TRUSTEES HON. DENNIS M. CLOUGH CEO/GENERAL MANAGER, INDIA L. BIRDSONG ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET SPECIAL THANKS TO THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE KAY M. SUTULA DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET CAROLYN YOUNG MANAGER OF BUDGETS LARRY FERRELL COORDINATOR OF FINANCIAL SYSTEMS & BUDGETS WESLEY A. KESHTKARAN SENIOR BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST ERIC VUKMANIC BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST NIKKI M. PONDER BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST JONATHAN C. CIESLA BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST MICHAEL SO BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST STEPHEN BITTO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS, COVER ARTWORK SHAREE H. LEWIS MANAGER, SUPPORT SERVICES, PRINTING/BINDING CARMEN DAVIS SUPPORT SERVICES CLERK, PRINTING/BINDING JOANN WILSON SUPPORT SERVICES CLERK, PRINTING/BINDING The Government Finance Officers Association of the United State and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Presentation to the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 2019. In order to receive this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, operational guide, financial plan, and communication device. The award is valid for a period of one year. We believe that our current budget document continues to conform to program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. DIRECTORY OF THE GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY OFFICIALS BOARD OF TRUSTEES HON. DENNIS M. CLOUGH BOARD PRESIDENT REV. CHARLES P. LUCAS BOARD VICE PRESIDENT JUSTIN M. BIBB HON. MICHAEL P. BYRNE TERENCE P. JOYCE VALARIE J. MCCALL KAREN GABRIEL MOSS LUZ N.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Adopted Budget Plan
    Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Operating and Capital Budget for the Year 2017 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 2017 ADOPTED BUDGET PLAN PRESIDENT – BOARD OF TRUSTEES GEORGE F. DIXON, III CEO/GENERAL MANAGER, SECRETARY‐TREASURER JOSEPH A. CALABRESE DIRECTORY OF THE GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY OFFICIALS BOARD OF TRUSTEES GEORGE F. DIXON, III PRESIDENT HON. DENNIS CLOUGH VICE PRESIDENT VALARIE J. MCCALL KAREN GABRIEL MOSS NICK “SONNY” NARDI HON. GARY A. NORTON, JR. LEO SERRANO HON. GEORGINE WELO REV. CHARLES P. LUCAS HON. TREVOR K. ELKINS EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM JOSEPH A. CALABRESE CEO/GENERAL MANAGER, SECRETARY‐TREASURER MICHAEL YORK DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, OPERATIONS LORETTA KIRK DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION MICHAEL SCHIPPER DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT SHERYL KING‐BENFORD DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, LEGAL AFFAIRS BRUCE E. HAMPTON DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, HUMAN RESOURCES PETER ANDERSON CIO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STEPHEN BITTO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS MICHAEL DAUGHERTY ACTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET ANTHONY GAROFOLI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INTERNAL AUDIT FRANK POLIVKA DIRECTOR, PROCUREMENT OPERATING DEPARTMENTS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 1 ‐ OPERATIONS DIVISION OLIVER DRAPER, DIRECTOR 31 ‐ PARATRANSIT DISTRICT SEAN THOMPSON, DIRECTOR 32 ‐ RAIL DISTRICT TERRENCE BOYLAN, DIRECTOR 33 ‐ ASSET & CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JOHN JOYCE, CHIEF OF POLICE 34 ‐ TRANSIT POLICE JOEL FREILICH, DIRECTOR
    [Show full text]
  • Operating and Capital Budget for the Year 2021 Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
    GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 2021 GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 2021 BUDGET PLAN PRESIDENT – BOARD OF TRUSTEES HON. DENNIS M. CLOUGH CEO/GENERAL MANAGER, INDIA L. BIRDSONG ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET SPECIAL THANKS TO THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE KAY M. SUTULA DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET CAROLYN YOUNG MANAGER OF BUDGETS LARRY FERRELL COORDINATOR OF FINANCIAL SYSTEMS & BUDGETS WESLEY A. KESHTKARAN SENIOR BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST ERIC VUKMANIC SENIOR BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST NIKKI M. PONDER BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST JONATHAN C. CIESLA BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST MICHAEL SO BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST STEPHEN BITTO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS, COVER ARTWORK SHAREE H. LEWIS MANAGER, SUPPORT SERVICES, PRINTING/BINDING CARMEN DAVIS SUPPORT SERVICES CLERK, PRINTING/BINDING JOANN WILSON SUPPORT SERVICES CLERK, PRINTING/BINDING The Government Finance Officers Association of the United State and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Presentation to the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 2020. In order to receive this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, operational guide, financial plan, and communication device. The award is valid for a period of one year. We believe that our current budget document continues to conform to program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. DIRECTORY OF THE GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY OFFICIALS BOARD OF TRUSTEES HON. DENNIS M. CLOUGH (ENDING FEB 2021) BOARD PRESIDENT REV. CHARLES P. LUCAS BOARD VICE PRESIDENT JUSTIN M.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorain County Transit Redevelopment Plan
    Lorain County Transit Redevelopment Plan a TLCI Study Sponsored by Lorain County May 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................................................1 2. Background ...............................................................................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Project Objective and Goals ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................................................................................4 3.1 Demographic and Socioeconomic Trends ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Existing Transit Service and Riders ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Governance, Financial Status and Fare Policy .................................................................................................................................................... 23 4. Potential
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting West Park
    Connecting West Park The Viking Planning Group UST 611 Planning Studio Spring 2019 Table of Contents 3. Market Study 313131 7. Strategies for Implementation 919191 3.1 Single & Two-Family Housing Analysis 32 7.1 Implementation Strategy 92 Introduction and Executive SummarSummaryyyy 333 3.2 Multi-Family Market Analysis 35 7.2 Funding Sources 96 3.3 Office Market Analysis 36 1. Vision Statement and Goals 666 3.4 Industrial Market Analysis 38 Planning Team 999999 1.1 Vision Statement and Mission 7 3.5 Retail Market Analysis 39 1.2 Project Goals 7 3.6 Highest and Best Use Analysis 40 Appendices 100 2. Existing Conditions 888 4. Community Engagement 424242 2.1 History of West Park 9 4.1 Overview and Methodology 43 2.2 Demographics 11 4.2 Equity Considerations 43 2.3 Current Land Use and Zoning 14 4.3 Survey Results 44 2.4 Environmental Conditions 16 4.4 Stakeholder Interview Results 48 2.5 Transportation and Mobility 20 2.6 Crime 26 5. Conceptual Frameworks 505050 2.7 SWOT Analysis 27 5.1 History of Middle Neighborhoods 51 2.8 Existing Planning Studies 28 5.2 History of Transit-Oriented Development 54 5.3 Transit-Oriented Development Case Studies 55 6. RecommendationRecommendationssss 585858 6.1 The Kmart Site 60 6.2 West Park Station 68 6.3 Lorain Ave. Corridor 81 2 Introduction and Executive Summary 3 Introduction Additional Guidance From: The Viking Planning Group was engaged by Kamm’s Corners Development Corporation to conduct a planning study of the Martin Keane Ward 17 Councilman area bound roughly by Triskett Rd., W.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide TOD Study
    Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study Factors for Success in California TECHNICAL APPENDIX September 2002 BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION and HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Funding for this study was provided by the California Department of Transportation, State Planning and Research program (80% Federal Highway Administration and 20% State transportation funds). Disclaimer The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and advisory committees and not necessarily those of the California Department of Transportation. The mention of commercial products, their source or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as either an actual or implied endorsement of such products. Copyright Information The text of this document and any images (e.g., photos, graphics, figures, and tables) that are specifically attributed (in full, or in coordination with another group) to the California Department of Transportation may be freely distributed or copied, so long as full credit is provided. However, this document also includes a number of copyrighted images (e.g., photographs, illustrations, graphics, figures, and tables) that are not owned by the State of California (which are reprinted in this report with permission). Before using any of these copyrighted items in another publication, it is necessary to obtain specific permission from the attributed owners. The names of these copyright holders are provided vertically next to each of these images. (Note: the U.S. Copyright Office provides “Fair Use” guidelines on this subject.) Cover image attributions: Left-side photo by Parsons Brinckerhoff and the California Department of Transportation (American Plaza, San Diego); Center Illustration by Lennertz and Coyle Associates/Seth Harry (Pleasant Hill TOD), Right-side photo by Parsons Brinckerhoff (Hollywood/Highlands TOD).
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Single Audit Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2001
    GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Single Audit Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 35 North Fourth Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone 614-466-3402 800-443-9275 Facsimile 614-728-7199 www.auditor.state.oh.us Board of Trustees Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority We have reviewed the Independent Auditor's Report of the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, Cuyahoga County, prepared by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. Based upon this review, we have accepted these reports in lieu of the audit required by Section 117.11, Revised Code. The Auditor of State did not audit the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, we are unable to express, and do not express an opinion on them. Our review was made in reference to the applicable sections of legislative criteria, as reflected by the Ohio Constitution, and the Revised Code, policies, procedures and guidelines of the Auditor of State, regulations and grant requirements. The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority is responsible for compliance with these laws and regulations. JIM PETRO Auditor of State August 2, 2002 This Page is Intentionally Left Blank. GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Independent Auditors’ Report 2 Comparative Balance Sheets 3 Comparative Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Equity 4 Comparative Statements of Cash Flows 5 Notes to Financial Statements 7-17 SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULES: Supplemental
    [Show full text]
  • RED LINE Schedule, Stops And
    RED LINE subway time schedule & line map RED LINE Red Line - Airport View In Website Mode The RED LINE subway line (Red Line - Airport) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Red Line - Airport: 24 hours (2) Red Line - Brookpark: 1:01 AM - 1:53 AM (3) Red Line - E. 79th Street: 12:36 AM - 12:51 AM (4) Red Line - Stokes / Windermere: 24 hours (5) Red Line - Tower City / Public Square: 24 hours (6) Red Line - W. 25th Street: 24 hours Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest RED LINE subway station near you and ƒnd out when is the next RED LINE subway arriving. Direction: Red Line - Airport RED LINE subway Time Schedule 9 stops Red Line - Airport Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 24 hours Monday 24 hours W. 25 - Ohio City Station 2350 Abbey Ave, Cleveland Tuesday 24 hours W.65-Lorain Station Wednesday 24 hours 6100 Lawn Ave, Cleveland Thursday 24 hours West Blvd-Cudell Station Friday 24 hours W.117-Madison Station Saturday 24 hours West 117th Street, Lakewood Triskett Station 13405 Triskett Rd, Lakewood RED LINE subway Info West Park Station Direction: Red Line - Airport 14510 Lorain Ave, Cleveland Stops: 9 Trip Duration: 24 min Puritas Station Line Summary: W. 25 - Ohio City Station, W.65- Lorain Station, West Blvd-Cudell Station, W.117- Brookpark Station Madison Station, Triskett Station, West Park Station, Puritas Station, Brookpark Station, Airport Station Airport Station Direction: Red Line - Brookpark RED LINE subway Time Schedule 8 stops Red Line - Brookpark Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 1:01 AM - 1:53 AM Monday 1:01 AM - 1:53 AM W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Adopted Amended Budget Plan
    GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 2018 ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET PLAN PRESIDENT – BOARD OF TRUSTEES HON. DENNIS M. CLOUGH CEO/GENERAL MANAGER, SECRETARY‐TREASURER JOSEPH A. CALABRESE DIRECTORY OF THE GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY OFFICIALS BOARD OF TRUSTEES HON. DENNIS M. CLOUGH BOARD PRESIDENT REV. CHARLES P. LUCAS BOARD VICE PRESIDENT KELLEY C. BRITT HON. TREVOR K. ELKINS VALARIE J. MCCALL KAREN GABRIEL MOSS NICK “SONNY” NARDI HON. GARY A. NORTON, JR. LEO SERRANO HON. GEORGINE WELO EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM JOSEPH A. CALABRESE CEO/GENERAL MANAGER, SECRETARY‐TREASURER DR. FLOUN’SAY CAVER DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, OPERATIONS RAJAN D. GAUTAM DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION MICHAEL SCHIPPER DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, ENGINEERING & PROJECT MGMT. SHERYL KING BENFORD DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, LEGAL AFFAIRS GEORGE FIELDS ACTING DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, HUMAN RESOURCES PETER ANDERSON CIO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STEPHEN BITTO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS TOM RAGUZ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET ANTHONY GAROFOLI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INTERNAL AUDIT MELINDA DANGELO DIRECTOR, PROCUREMENT OPERATING DEPARTMENTS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 1 ‐ OPERATIONS DIVISION OLIVER DRAPER, DIRECTOR 31 ‐ PARATRANSIT DISTRICT AN SE THOMPSON, DIRECTOR 32 ‐ RAIL DISTRICT TERRENCE BOYLAN, MANAGER 33 ‐ ASSET & CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JOHN JOYCE, CHIEF OF POLICE 34 ‐ TRANSIT POLICE JOEL FREILICH, DIRECTOR 35 – SERVICE MANAGEMENT ANTHONY RICHARDSON, ACTING DIR. 38 – SERVICE QUALITY
    [Show full text]