Jerusalem and Antioch: a Template for Outreach

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jerusalem and Antioch: a Template for Outreach Jerusalem and Antioch: A Template for Outreach The church in Jerusalem had certain characteristics: • Based in Jerusalem. • Regular prayer and worship in the temple, fellowship in believers’ homes. • Overwhelmingly Aramaic-speaking Jewish Christians (Hebraioi). • No overt intent to form a separate religion, but existed within a pluralistic Judaism. • Confessed Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah. • Entry by baptism and (assumed) circumcision. • Led by the apostles, in particular by Peter and James the Elder. • Mission was primarily to the Jews (full restoration of Israel, i.e. backwards looking). • Very limited intentional Gentile missionary work. • Anticipated mass Gentile conversions in the eschatological pilgrimage of nations to Jerusalem. • Accepted Gentile converts from amongst the “God-fearers” but these were to be circumcised and must submit to the full Torah. • Maintained that both faith in Jesus and obedience to the Torah was necessary for salvation. As did the church of Antioch: • Based in Antioch (modern-day SE Turkey). • No temple worship, but had regular worship and fellowship in believers’ homes. • Overwhelmingly Greek-speaking Jewish or Gentile Christians (Hellenistai). • Confessed Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah. • Entry by baptism without circumcision. • Led by Paul and Barnabas. • Called “Christians,” i.e. not viewed as a Jewish sect but as an entirely new religion. • Self-understanding as the launching pad for a new humanity in which all social distinctions were overcome by agape love and fellowship, i.e. forward looking. • Very intentional Jewish and Gentile missionary work, including in Cyprus and Asia Minor and Greece. • Eager to win Gentile converts without the need for circumcision and Torah compliance. • Jewish and Gentile believers fellowshipped together freely, without ethnic distinctions. • Maintained that faith in Jesus and baptism were necessary for salvation. Circumcision was unnecessary. Jerusalem and Antioch were very different communities of faith: Jerusalem Antioch Theology and practice focused on the past. Theology and practice focused on the future. Passive, reacting to external influences. Actively seeking to influence. Defined theologically by the past. Defined theologically by the future. Leaders remained mainly at Jerusalem. Sent leaders out as missionaries. Anxious about risks. Willing to face risks. Guarded theological and ethnic boundaries. Crossed theological and ethnic boundaries. Focused on consolidation. Focused on mission. Focused on the Torah, with dominant role for Focused on grace, with obedience to the obedience to the Torah. leading of the Spirit. Reluctant to cross frontiers. Eager to cross frontiers. Ethnically homogenous (mostly Jewish some Ethnically diverse. some Gentile believers). Institutionalized. A dynamic movement. Understandably, there were tensions…. • Jerusalem not happy that Peter ate with the uncircumcised Gentile called Cornelius (Acts 11.1-3). • Jerusalem sent Barnabas to investigate the news coming to Jerusalem from Antioch (Acts 11.22). • Jerusalem insisted that new believers be circumcised (Acts 15.1). • A delegation from Jerusalem caused Peter to cease eating with uncircumcised Gentiles, and he was then rebuked for hypocrisy by Paul (Gal. 2.11-14). • Jerusalem still “zealous for the law” after all Paul’s missionary journeys complete (Acts 21.20). But, there was a resolution….of sorts • At the Council of Jerusalem (Acts 15), the Antioch / pro-Gentile party prevailed over the Judaizers of Jerusalem. • Judaizers however followed Paul on his missionary journeys to insist that new Gentile believers be circumcised (Gal. 3). • Paul himself went further than the Jerusalem Council by allowing those with strong faith to eat food offered to idols in 1 Cor. 8. • The Church initially ministered to Jews, there followed a Gentile influx, and then the Church was overwhelmingly Gentile and ministering primarily to Gentiles. • The Jewish component of the Church faded away over the centuries. Which leads us to reflect on our own motives for service.... There are questionable motives: • Imperialist motive – turning converts into docile subjects of colonial authorities. • Cultural motive – mission as the transfer of the missionaries’ “superior” culture. • Romantic motive – mission as the fulfillment of the desire for exotic locations and overseas adventure. • Ecclesiastical motive – the urge to export one’s own confession and church authority to new territories. There are also theologically defensible motives: • The conversion motive – emphasizes personal decisions for Christ, but narrows the Kingdom of God to the number of “saved” souls. • The eschatological motive – points believers to the 2nd Coming, but ignores present needs or injustices. • The church planting motive – builds congregations, but identifies the visible church with God’s kingdom. • The philanthropic motive – works for justice, but limits God’s Kingdom to social improvements in this world alone. But there is an absolutely necessary motive: • The motive of agape love – as ambassadors of Christ, we are constrained / compelled by the love of Christ for those He died to save (2 Cor. 5.14). • Gospel Commission I (Matt. 28.18-20) – make disciples, teach and baptize. • Gospel Commission II (Luke 24.44-47) – proclaim repentance and forgiveness in the name of Jesus. • Gospel Commission III (John 20.21-23) – proclaim the promise of the Holy Spirit and forgiveness for sins. • Gospel Commission IV (Acts 1.8) – witnesses to the resurrection of Jesus. And what do we proclaim in our work? 1. Jesus Christ is the divine Son of God. He is not merely a teacher (e.g. Aristotle or Plato), a civic leader (e.g. Moses) or a lesser deity (e.g. Siva). (John 8.58-59; 10.30-33, Matt. 16.14-16, 1 Cor. 15.14-20). 2. Jesus Christ is the unique source of life and salvation and people need to know about Him (John 3.36, Acts 4.12, 1 John 5.12). 3. Jesus Christ offers a unique salvation – by grace through faith (Eph. 2.8-9). 4. Jesus Christ offers a universal salvation – all inclusive and exclusive in nature (John 3.16; 14.6). .
Recommended publications
  • The-Legal-Status-Of-East-Jerusalem.Pdf
    December 2013 Written by: Adv. Yotam Ben-Hillel Cover photo: Bab al-Asbat (The Lion’s Gate) and the Old City of Jerusalem. (Photo by: JC Tordai, 2010) This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position or the official opinion of the European Union. The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) is an independent, international humanitarian non- governmental organisation that provides assistance, protection and durable solutions to refugees and internally displaced persons worldwide. The author wishes to thank Adv. Emily Schaeffer for her insightful comments during the preparation of this study. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. Background ............................................................................................................................ 6 3. Israeli Legislation Following the 1967 Occupation ............................................................ 8 3.1 Applying the Israeli law, jurisdiction and administration to East Jerusalem .................... 8 3.2 The Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel ................................................................... 10 4. The Status
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian Economy in East Jerusalem, Some Pertinent Aspects of Social Conditions Are Reviewed Below
    UNITED N A TIONS CONFERENC E ON T RADE A ND D EVELOPMENT Enduring annexation, isolation and disintegration UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Enduring annexation, isolation and disintegration New York and Geneva, 2013 Notes The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ______________________________________________________________________________ Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. ______________________________________________________________________________ Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint to be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat: Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. ______________________________________________________________________________ The preparation of this report by the UNCTAD secretariat was led by Mr. Raja Khalidi (Division on Globalization and Development Strategies), with research contributions by the Assistance to the Palestinian People Unit and consultant Mr. Ibrahim Shikaki (Al-Quds University, Jerusalem), and statistical advice by Mr. Mustafa Khawaja (Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, Ramallah). ______________________________________________________________________________ Cover photo: Copyright 2007, Gugganij. Creative Commons, http://commons.wikimedia.org (accessed 11 March 2013). (Photo taken from the roof terrace of the Austrian Hospice of the Holy Family on Al-Wad Street in the Old City of Jerusalem, looking towards the south. In the foreground is the silver dome of the Armenian Catholic church “Our Lady of the Spasm”.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem: City of Dreams, City of Sorrows
    1 JERUSALEM: CITY OF DREAMS, CITY OF SORROWS More than ever before, urban historians tell us that global cities tend to look very much alike. For U.S. students. the“ look alike” perspective makes it more difficult to empathize with and to understand cultures and societies other than their own. The admittedly superficial similarities of global cities with U.S. ones leads to misunderstandings and confusion. The multiplicity of cybercafés, high-rise buildings, bars and discothèques, international hotels, restaurants, and boutique retailers in shopping malls and multiplex cinemas gives these global cities the appearances of familiarity. The ubiquity of schools, university campuses, signs, streetlights, and urban transportation systems can only add to an outsider’s “cultural and social blindness.” Prevailing U.S. learning goals that underscore American values of individualism, self-confidence, and material comfort are, more often than not, obstacles for any quick study or understanding of world cultures and societies by visiting U.S. student and faculty.1 Therefore, international educators need to look for and find ways in which their students are able to look beyond the veneer of the modern global city through careful program planning and learning strategies that seek to affect the students in their “reading and learning” about these fertile centers of liberal learning. As the students become acquainted with the streets, neighborhoods, and urban centers of their global city, their understanding of its ways and habits is embellished and enriched by the walls, neighborhoods, institutions, and archaeological sites that might otherwise cause them their “cultural and social blindness.” Jerusalem is more than an intriguing global historical city.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem Ardi Imseis
    American University International Law Review Volume 15 | Issue 5 Article 2 2000 Facts on the Ground: An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem Ardi Imseis Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Imseis, Ardi. "Facts on the Ground: An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem." American University International Law Review 15, no. 5 (2000): 1039-1069. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTS ON THE GROUND: AN EXAMINATION OF ISRAELI MUNICIPAL POLICY IN EAST JERUSALEM ARDI IMSEIS* INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1040 I. BACKGROUND ........................................... 1043 A. ISRAELI LAW, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EAST JERUSALEM SINCE 1967 ................................. 1043 B. ISRAELI MUNICIPAL POLICY IN EAST JERUSALEM ......... 1047 II. FACTS ON THE GROUND: ISRAELI MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY IN EAST JERUSALEM ........................ 1049 A. EXPROPRIATION OF PALESTINIAN LAND .................. 1050 B. THE IMPOSITION OF JEWISH SETTLEMENTS ............... 1052 C. ZONING PALESTINIAN LANDS AS "GREEN AREAS".....
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Implications of an Historical Approach to Jewish Studies
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 482 214 SO 035 468 AUTHOR Furst, Rachel TITLE The Religious Implications of an Historical Approach to Jewish Studies. PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 59p.; Prepared by the Academy for Torah Initiatives and Directions (Jerusalem, Israel). AVAILABLE FROM Academy for Torah Initiatives and Directions,9 HaNassi Street, Jerusalem 92188, Israel. Tel: 972-2-567-1719; Fax: 972-2-567-1723; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://www.atid.org/ . PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Curriculum Development; Discourse Communities; *Jews; *Judaism; *Religion Studies; *Religious Factors; Research Methodology; Scholarship IDENTIFIERS Historical Methods; *Jewish Studies; *Torah ABSTRACT This project examines the religious implications of an approach to "limmudei kodesh" (primarily the study of Talmud) and "halakhah" (an integration of academic scholarship with traditional Torah study and the evaluation of the educational pros and cons of a curriculum built on such a synthesis) .In the concerted effort over the past century to develop a program of "Torah U-Madda" that synthesizes Torah and worldly pursuits, Torah scholars have endorsed the value of secular knowledge as a complimentary accoutrement to the "Talmud Torah" endeavor, but few have validated the application of secular academic tools and methodologies to Torah study or developed a model for such integrated Torah learning. The Torah scholar committed to synthesis seeks to employ historical knowledge and methodological tools in the decoding of halakhic texts as a means of contributing to the halakhic discourse. Traditional "Talmud Torah" does not address the realm of pesak halakhah, but it is nonetheless considered the highest form of religious expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec
    Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 Author(s): Lewis Bayles Paton Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Apr., 1913), pp. 1-53 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259319 . Accessed: 09/04/2012 16:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE Volume XXXII Part I 1913 Israel's Conquest of Canaan Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 LEWIS BAYLES PATON HARTFORD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY problem of Old Testament history is more fundamental NO than that of the manner in which the conquest of Canaan was effected by the Hebrew tribes. If they came unitedly, there is a possibility that they were united in the desert and in Egypt. If their invasions were separated by wide intervals of time, there is no probability that they were united in their earlier history. Our estimate of the Patriarchal and the Mosaic traditions is thus conditioned upon the answer that we give to this question.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Al-Aqsa Mosque Al-Haram Ash-Sharif Contents
    A Guide to Al-Aqsa Mosque Al-Haram Ash-Sharif Contents In the name of Allah, most compassionate, most merciful Introduction JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<<3 Dear Visitor, Mosques JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<<<4 Welcome to one of the major Islamic sacred sites and landmarks Domes JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<24 of civilization in Jerusalem, which is considered a holy city in Islam because it is the city of the prophets. They preached of the Minarets JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<30 Messenger of God, Prophet Mohammad (PBUH): Arched Gates JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<32 The Messenger has believed in what was revealed to him from his Lord, and [so have] the believers. All of them have believed in Allah and His angels and Schools JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<36 His books and His messengers, [saying], “We make no distinction between any of His messengers.” And they say, “We hear and we obey. [We seek] Your Corridors JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<<44 forgiveness, our Lord, and to You is the [final] destination” (Qur’an 2:285). Gates JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<<46 It is also the place where one of Prophet Mohammad’s miracles, the Night Journey (Al-Isra’ wa Al-Mi’raj), took place: Water Sources JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ<<<54 Exalted is He who took His Servant
    [Show full text]
  • The Marwani Musalla in Jerusalem
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Art Faculty Publications Art Department 2013 The aM rwani Musalla in Jerusalem: New Findings Beatrice St. Laurent Bridgewater State University, [email protected] Isam Awwad Virtual Commons Citation St. Laurent, Beatrice and Awwad, Isam (2013). The aM rwani Musalla in Jerusalem: New Findings. In Art Faculty Publications. Paper 8. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/art_fac/8 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. The Marwani Shortly after Caliph ‘Umar ibn al- Khattab’s (579-644, caliph 634-644) Musalla in arrival in Jerusalem in 638, he is said to Jerusalem: have constructed a rudimentary mosque 1 or prayer space south of the historical New Findings Rock now contained within the Dome of Beatrice St. Laurent the Rock (completed 691) on the former and Isam Awwad Temple Mount or Bayt al-Maqdis known popularly since Mamluk and Ottoman times as the Haram al-Sharif.2 (Fig.1) Though later textual evidence indicates that ‘Umar prayed somewhere south of the “rock” and later scholars suggest that he constructed a rudimentary prayer space on the site, there is no surviving physical evidence of that initial structure. After his appointment as Governor of Syria (bilad al-sham) by ‘Umar in 639/40, Mu‘awiya ibn Abi Sufyan (602-680, caliph Figure 1: Air view of the Haram al-Sharif from 660-680)3 either expanded upon the Mosque the north showing the eastern area of the Haram al-Sharif. Source: Matson Collection, Library of of ‘Umar or constructed an entirely new Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and Religion in Late Bronze Age Canaan
    religions Article Archaeology and Religion in Late Bronze Age Canaan Aaron Greener W.F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem, Salah e-Din St 26, 91190 Jerusalem, Israel; [email protected] Received: 28 February 2019; Accepted: 2 April 2019; Published: 9 April 2019 Abstract: Dozens of temples were excavated in the Canaanite city-states of the Late Bronze Age. These temples were the focal points for the Canaanites’ cultic activities, mainly sacrifices and ceremonial feasting. Numerous poetic and ritual texts from the contemporary city of Ugarit reveal the rich pantheon of Canaanite gods and goddesses which were worshiped by the Canaanites. Archaeological remains of these rites include burnt animal bones and many other cultic items, such as figurines and votive vessels, which were discovered within the temples and sanctuaries. These demonstrate the diverse and receptive character of the Canaanite religion and ritual practices. It seems that the increased Egyptian presence in Canaan towards the end of the period had an influence on the local belief system and rituals in some areas, a fact which is demonstrated by the syncretic architectural plans of several of the temples, as well as by glyptic and votive items. Late Bronze Age religious and cultic practices have attracted much attention from Biblical scholars and researchers of the religion of Ancient Israel who are searching for the similarities and influences between the Late Bronze Age and the following Iron Age. Keywords: Late Bronze Age; Canaan; religion; cult; temples; Egypt 1. Introduction Numerous excavations and a fairly large number of contemporary written documents give us a good picture of the religious system and cult practices in Canaan1 during the Late Bronze Age (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Islamic Toponymy of the Holy Land and Holy City
    CHAPTER 3 Notes on the Islamic Toponymy of the Holy Land and Holy City Jacob Lassner What is generally known of Muslim sacred geography has been distilled into a very broad set of understandings. Most non-Muslims vaguely familiar with the outlines of Islamic civilization are aware of the reverence commanded by the holy cities situated in the Hijaz region of Arabia. Many are also aware, that like Mecca and Medina, the so-called haramayn of the Hijaz, the biblical Holy Land and its holiest city Jerusalem have a special place in the sacred geography of Islam. But these overarching views do not do justice to explaining Islam’s early engagement with the sacred space of Jews and Christians. I refer to the complex process by which Arab Muslims initially redefined the biblical land- scape, be it by reshaping tales of biblical persons and events or by Muslims appropriating and redefining Jerusalem and the pre-Islamic Holy Land.1 What follows is a series of philological notes that draw attention to the toponyms by which the Muslim faithful came to define Jerusalem and beyond the city, the territory known to Jews as Erez Israel, and Christians as Terra Sancta. This modest study is drawn from an extended work in the making that bears the title “The Origins of Islamic Jerusalem: Forging Sacred Space in a City Holy to 1 The stories of biblical personae are amplified in that genre of Arabic literature known as Qisas al-anbiya’ or “Tales of the Prophets.” Accounts specifically related to the Holy Land and Jerusalem are collected in a body of literature known as Fada’il, that is, works of praise (for Jerusalem and its surroundings).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    Understanding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Global Classroom Workshops made possible by: THE Photo Courtesy of Bill Taylor NORCLIFFE FOUNDATION A Resource Packet for Educators Compiled by Kristin Jensen, Jillian Foote, and Tese Wintz Neighbor And World May 12, 2009 Affairs Council Members HOW TO USE THIS RESOURCE GUIDE Please note: many descriptions were excerpted directly from the websites. Packet published: 5/11/2009; Websites checked: 5/11/2009 Recommended Resources Links that include… Lesson Plans & Charts & Graphs Teacher Resources Audio Video Photos & Slideshows Maps TABLE OF CONTENTS MAPS 1 FACT SHEET 3 TIMELINES OF THE CONFLICT 4 GENERAL RESOURCES ON THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT 5 TOPICS OF INTEREST 7 CURRENT ARTICLES/EDITORIALS ON THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT 8 (Focus on International Policy and Peace-Making) THE CRISIS IN GAZA 9 RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES: WEEK OF MAY 4TH 10 RELATED REGIONAL ISSUES 11 PROPOSED SOLUTIONS 13 ONE-STATE SOLUTION 14 TWO-STATE SOLUTION 14 THE OVERLAPPING CONUNDRUM – THE SETTLEMENTS 15 CONFLICT RESOLUTION TEACHER RESOURCES 15 MEDIA LITERACY 17 NEWS SOURCES FROM THE MIDEAST 18 NGOS INVOLVED IN ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN RELATIONS 20 LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS & RESOURCES 22 DOCUMENTARIES & FILMS 24 BOOKS 29 MAPS http://johomaps.com/as/mideast.html & www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/is.html Other excellent sources for maps: From the Jewish Virtual Library - http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/maptoc.html Foundation for Middle East Peace - http://www.fmep.org/maps/
    [Show full text]
  • The Temple Mount in Jerusalem - a View of the Areas That Are Closed to the Public Photos & Edit: Ron Peled 2008
    The Temple Mount in Jerusalem - A view of the areas that are closed to the public Photos & Edit: Ron Peled 2008 www.feelJerusalem.com The Temple Mount is open to tourist, but only for an excursion around the open plaza Entrance to the al-Aqsa Mosque, the Dome of the Rock, Solomon's Stables and other sitesbelow the Mount itself, are off limits to any non-Muslims. So, let's go in… The structure of the Dome of the Rock is called, in Arabic, Qubat al-Sakhra (which is not the Mosque of Omar, and in fact, not a mosque at all.). It was built in 691 by the Caliph Abd al-Malik (who founded the first Arab town in Israel – Ramla), and is believed to be the oldest and most intact Muslim structure in the Middle East. The interior of the dome is gilded and adorned with beautiful art Gold… The rock in the center of the structure is called the Foundation Stone. According to the Jewish and Muslim faiths, this is where the world was founded. It is where Abraham nearly sacrificed his son Isaac (Mount Moriah), it is where the very center of the Temple, the Holy of Holies, was located (give or take a few feet – but who’s counting?) and according to Islam, from this very place, Mohammad ascended to heaven. According to Islamic tradition, from this very place, Muhammad ascended to Heaven accompanied by the angel Gabriel Below the Foundation Stone is a cave where, according to tradition, Mohammad prayed. The pillars seen in the picture are of secondary use, from the Crusade period when the Templar Knights lodged at the temple mount The Mihrab at the entrance to the cave is in honor of King Solomon and is probably one of the first prayer niches in the Muslim world The al-Aqsa Mosque, above the southern wall of the Temple (Hulda Gates) was first built at the beginning of the 8th century by the Caliph al-Walid.
    [Show full text]