Page Acronycta Impressa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Page Acronycta Impressa INDEX A Page Acronycta impressa . .. 42 Agricultural Committee . II Agricultural Division ..................................... : . VII Agrilus ruficollis . 51 Agrotis ypsilon . 77 Alypia octomaculata . 72 Ampelophaga myron . 71 Amphicerus bicaudatus . 66 Anarsia lineatella . 74 Anasa tristis . 80 Angumois Grain Moth . 42 Animal Husbandry Division . • . XI Anomola marginata ............................... ·' ; . 54 Ant Hills in Lawns ............................................ 179 Anthonomus signatus . 52 Aphis, Black, on Violets . • . 189 Aphis cucumeris . 80 Aphrophora 4-nota . • . • 67 Apple Twig Borer ............................... : . 66 Arctomys monax ..............................................• 162 Arsenate of Lead . 115 Arvicola ........................................................ 148 B Bacon, Digestion experiments wnn .......................... 270, 272 Barn Swallow . 132 Basswood, Galls on . 185 Bay-Winged Bunting . 134 Buds, common . 12S Blight of potatoes defined. 1 Board of Regents . II Bolting-Cloth Beetle . 46 Bordeaux Mixture for potato blight and rot . 5 Borer, Stalk . 51 Bordeaux Mixture ........................................... 83, 115 Box Elder, Gallmakers on . 185 Blackberry Insects . 47 Black-capped Titmouse . 135 Blight on Melon . • . 83 Blue Bird . 129 Bracon brevicornis . 36 Bracon hebetor . ... 36 Bramble Crown Borer . 49 Bridge-grafting ............ ·................................ 157, 164 278 INDEX Brooder Houses • . 248 Brown Aphis on Violets . 189 Bud Moth . 52 Bulletins Published during the Year . CV . Bumble Flower Beetle .............. 4 73 Byturus unicolor . 52 c Cabbage Maggot ............................................... 17?, Cabbage Worm ............................................ 174, 178 Cacoecia rosaceana ............................................ 54 Cadelle . 46 Calandria granaria . 41 C. oryza . 41 Gane Borer, Red-necked . 51 Caterba catenaria . 53 Cecidomyia aceris . 172 C. negundinis . 186 C. robiniae . 188 Chain- dotted Geometer . 153 Chemical Division . IX Chickadee . 135 Chickens, marketing . 257 Chicks, Food and Care of . 25~ Chinch Bug . 15 Ghremylas rubiginosus . 36 Combination of Humus with Phosphates in soils . 205 Combination of Humus with Potash of soils ................... 208 Composition of Heavy and Light 'Veight Seeds .................. 218 Confused Flour Beetle . 43 Ccrn, Gi'Itenous and starchy . 221 Correspondents, Reports of . 121 Corrosive Sublimate Treatment for scab . 8 Cottage Cheese, Digestibility and Nutritive Value of .......... 2GO 272 Cottony Manie Scale ......................................... 67, 181 "Cotton-tail" ................................................... 149 Craponius inaeoualis . 74 Cryptorhyncus lapathi ......................................... 115 Crop rotation ................................................. 192 Cucumber Insects . 80 Cucumber Beetle, Striped . 81 Cucumber Flea Beetle . 82 Currant and Gooseberry Insects . 5G Currant Borer, Imported . 56 Currant Worm, Imported . 58 Currant Caterpillar, Spiny . 61 Currant Fly . 63 Currant Fruit Worm . 63 Currant Plant Louse. 59 Currant Span Worm . 60 Cut Worms ................. ·............... ·.................. 7·7, 171 D Dairy Division . IX Desmia maculalis . 69 Diabrotica, 12 Spotted .................. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8p Diabrotica, 12 punctata ........................................ 82 INDEX 279 Diabrotica vittata . ..
Recommended publications
  • Integrated Pest Management for Raspberry Beetle
    Integrated Pest Management for Raspberry Beetle Order: Coleoptera Family: Byturidae Species: Byturus unicolor The raspberry beetle, also known as the raspberry fruitworm, is a product contaminant pest found in raspberry fields in Washington. The larvae, or fruitworm, may fall off with the fruit during machine harvest. This pest has often been controlled by a diazinon treatment at 5% bloom, before pollinators are brought into the field. The United States Environmental Protection Agency is seeking to reduce the use of organophosphates, such as diazinon, through higher restrictions and cancellations. New monitoring tools for the raspberry beetle have been developed and tested in Whatcom County. The Rebell® Bianco white sticky trap can be used to detect raspberry beetle levels in a field. This may help in determining what treatment, if any, is Figure 1: Adult raspberry required for control of the pest. beetle on a raspberry bud Biology: The adult raspberry beetle is between 0.15 and 0.2” in length, a reddish brown color with short hairs covering its whole body (see figure 1). Overwintering in the soil, the adult emerges in the spring between mid-April and mid-May depending on soil temperatures. The adults feed on leaves, often on the new primocane leaves, but in areas of high populations they will also feed on upper floricane leaves. Adults are then attracted to flower buds and blooms where mating and, subsequently, ovipositing occurs. Larvae (or fruitworm) emerge from the eggs on the flower or immature fruit and begin feeding on the receptacle. The larvae are between 0.1” and 0.25” in length depending on the time of season.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Prescribed Fire and Fire Surrogates on Pollinators and Saproxylic Beetles in North Carolina and Alabama
    EFFECTS OF PRESCRIBED FIRE AND FIRE SURROGATES ON POLLINATORS AND SAPROXYLIC BEETLES IN NORTH CAROLINA AND ALABAMA by JOSHUA W. CAMPBELL (Under the Direction of James L. Hanula) ABSTRACT Pollinating and saproxylic insects are two groups of forest insects that are considered to be extremely vital for forest health. These insects maintain and enhance plant diversity, but also help recycle nutrients back into the soil. Forest management practices (prescribed burns, thinnings, herbicide use) are commonly used methods to limit fuel build up within forests. However, their effects on pollinating and saproxylic insects are poorly understood. We collected pollinating and saproxylic insect from North Carolina and Alabama from 2002-2004 among different treatment plots. In North Carolina, we captured 7921 floral visitors from four orders and 21 families. Hymenoptera was the most abundant and diverse order, with Halictidae being the most abundant family. The majority of floral visitors were captured in the mechanical plus burn treatments, while lower numbers were caught on the mechanical only treatments, burn only treatments and control treatments. Overall species richness was also higher on mechanical plus burn treatments compared to other treatments. Total pollinator abundance was correlated with decreased tree basal area (r2=0.58) and increased percent herbaceous plant cover (r2=0.71). We captured 37,191 saproxylic Coleoptera in North Carolina, comprising 20 families and 122 species. Overall, species richness and total abundance of Coleoptera were not significantly different among treatments. However, total numbers of many key families, such as Scolytidae, Curculionidae, Cerambycidae, and Buprestidae, have higher total numbers in treated plots compared to untreated controls and several families (Elateridae, Cleridae, Trogositidae, Scolytidae) showed significant differences (p≤0.05) in abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)
    November - December 2008 633 ECOLOGY, BEHAVIOR AND BIONOMICS Wolbachia in Two Populations of Melittobia digitata Dahms (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) CLAUDIA S. COPELAND1, ROBERT W. M ATTHEWS2, JORGE M. GONZÁLEZ 3, MARTIN ALUJA4 AND JOHN SIVINSKI1 1USDA/ARS/CMAVE, 1700 SW 23rd Dr., Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; [email protected], [email protected] 2Dept. Entomology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; [email protected] 3Dept. Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-2475, USA; [email protected] 4Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Ap. postal 63, 91000 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico; [email protected] Neotropical Entomology 37(6):633-640 (2008) Wolbachia en Dos Poblaciones de Melittobia digitata Dahms (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) RESUMEN - Se investigaron dos poblaciones de Melittobia digitata Dahms, un parasitoide gregario (principalmente sobre un rango amplio de abejas solitarias, avispas y moscas), en busca de infección por Wolbachia. La primera población, provenía de Xalapa, México, y fue originalmente colectada y criada sobre pupas de la Mosca Mexicana de la Fruta, Anastrepha ludens Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae). La segunda población, originaria de Athens, Georgia, fue colectada y criada sobre prepupas de avispas de barro, Trypoxylon politum Say (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Estudios de PCR de la región ITS2 confi rmaron que ambas poblaciones del parasitoide pertenecen a la misma especie; lo que nos provee de un perfi l molecular taxonómico muy útil debído a que las hembras de las diversas especies de Melittobia son superfi cialmente similares. La amplifi cación del gen de superfi cie de proteina (wsp) de Wolbachia confi rmó la presencia de este endosimbionte en ambas poblaciones.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects Of. Prescribed Fire and Fire Surrogates on Saproxylic Coleoptera in the Southern Appalachians of North Carolina 1
    Effects of. Prescribed Fire and Fire Surrogates on Saproxylic Coleoptera in the Southern Appalachians of North Carolina 1 2 Joshua W. Campbell , James L. Hanula and Thomas A. Waldrop 3 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 320 Green St., Athens, Georgia 30602-2044 USA J. Entomol. Sci. 43(1): 57-75 (January 2008) Abstract We examined the effects of forest management practices (prescribed burning, me­ chanical, and prescribed burn plus mechanical) on saproxylic forest Coleoptera in the southern Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina. During the 2-yr study, we captured 37,191 Coleoptera with baited multiple-funnel traps and pipe traps, comprising 20 families and 122 species that were used for our analysis. Saproxylic beetle numbers increased greatly from the first year to the second year on all treatments. Species richness and total abundance of Coleoptera were not significantly affected by the treatments, but several families (e.g., Elateridae, Cleridae, Trogositi­ dae, Scolytidae) were significantly more abundant on treated plots. Abundances of many spe­ cies, including various species of Scolytidae were significantly affected by the treatments. How­ ever, these scolytids (Hylastes salebrosus Eichoff, Ips grandicollis Eichoff, Xyloborinus saxeseni Ratzburg, Xyleborus sp., Xyleborus atratus Eichoff) did not respond in the same way to the treatments. Likewise, other Coleoptera such as Pityophagus sp. (Nitidulidae), Hylobius pales Herbst (Curculionidae), and Xylotrechus sagittatus Germar (Cerambycidae) also varied in their responses to the treatments. Species richness was not significantly different for the spring 2003 trapping seasons, but the fall 2003 sample had a higher number of species on mechanical shrub removal only and mechanical shrub removal plus prescribed burning plots compared with con­ trols.
    [Show full text]
  • And Lepidoptera Associated with Fraxinus Pennsylvanica Marshall (Oleaceae) in the Red River Valley of Eastern North Dakota
    A FAUNAL SURVEY OF COLEOPTERA, HEMIPTERA (HETEROPTERA), AND LEPIDOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA MARSHALL (OLEACEAE) IN THE RED RIVER VALLEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By James Samuel Walker In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Department: Entomology March 2014 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School North DakotaTitle State University North DaGkroadtaua Stet Sacteho Uolniversity A FAUNAL SURVEYG rOFad COLEOPTERA,uate School HEMIPTERA (HETEROPTERA), AND LEPIDOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH Title A FFRAXINUSAUNAL S UPENNSYLVANICARVEY OF COLEO MARSHALLPTERTAitl,e HEM (OLEACEAE)IPTERA (HET INER THEOPTE REDRA), AND LAE FPAIDUONPATLE RSUAR AVSESYO COIFA CTOEDLE WOIPTTHE RFRAA, XHIENMUISP PTENRNAS (YHLEVTAENRICOAP TMEARRAS),H AANLDL RIVER VALLEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA L(EOPLIDEAOCPTEEAREA) I ANS TSHOEC RIAETDE RDI VWEITRH V FARLALXEIYN UOSF P EEANSNTSEYRLNV ANNOICRAT HM DAARKSHOATALL (OLEACEAE) IN THE RED RIVER VAL LEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA ByB y By JAMESJAME SSAMUEL SAMUE LWALKER WALKER JAMES SAMUEL WALKER TheThe Su pSupervisoryervisory C oCommitteemmittee c ecertifiesrtifies t hthatat t hthisis ddisquisition isquisition complies complie swith wit hNorth Nor tDakotah Dako ta State State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of University’s regulations and meetMASTERs the acce pOFted SCIENCE standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: David A. Rider DCoa-­CCo-Chairvhiadi rA.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographical Record
    September--October ISSS.] tS UCtIE. [4564-4577 11 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL RECORD. Authors and societies are requested to .forward tkeir works to t]e editors as soon as #ublisked. Tke date of ublicaNon, g'iven in 3racke/s [], mars te time at wkica tae work was received, unless an earlier date of ublicalion is known to recorder or editor. nless otaerwise slated eac& record is made directly from lae work tat is noticed. A colon after [nildal designates tae most common ffiven name, as: A: Augustus: B: Ben- [ami,t; C: Carles; D: David; E: Edward; F: Wrederic; G: George; H: Henry; I: Isaac; : on; Karl; L: Louis; M: Mark; : Wicaolas; 0: Otto; P: Peter; R: gicaard; S: Namuel; T: Taomas; W: William. Tae initials at te end of eaca record, or note, are taose of lae recorder. Correclzbns of errors and notices of omissions are soliciled. Anderson, Joseph jr. Entom61ogical col- Chapin, S. F. Scale insects. (Ist rept. lections. (Entomologist, Dec. 1887, v. 20, Board state hortic, comm. Cal., 1882, p. p. 329-33o.) 65-88, i.) Discusses value of entomological collections, and Account of habits of several species of coccidae: especially the of setting specitnens. G: yD. (4564) consideration of various remedies used for scale-in. I3ayford, E.G. The hessian fly previously sects. G: Z). (457o) in Great Britain. (Entomologist, Dec. Cockerell, T. D.A. A code of varietal no- 188 7, v. 20, p. 327 .) menclature. (Entomologist, June 1887, v. Ootes notice of the hessian fly (cecidomyia 20, p. 15o-52.) destructor) by E Newman, dated Feb. 1876.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalog of the Coleóptera of America North of Mexico Family: Byturidae
    ^ A CATALOG OF THE COLEÓPTERA OF AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO FAMILY: BYTURIDAE NAL Digitizing ProjectÉrqiect ah529103 ,^Jx UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE PREPARED BY ' DEPARTMENT OF HANDBOOK AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURE NUMBER 529-103 RESEARCH SERVICE FAMILIES OF COLEóPTERA IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO Fascicle' Family Year issued Fascicle' Family Year issued Fascicle' Family Year issued 1 Cupedidae 1979 46 Callirhipidae 102 Biphyllidae 2 Micromalthidae 1982 47 Heteroceridae 1978 103 Byturidae 1991 3 Carabidae 48 Limnichidae 1986 104 Mycetophagidae 4 Rhysodidae 1985 49 Dryopidae 1983 105 Ciidae 1982 5 Amphizoidae 1984 50 Elmidae 1983 107 Prostomidae 6 Haliplidae 51 Buprestidae 109 Colydiidae 8 Noteridae 52 Cebrionidae 110 Monommatidae 9 Dytiscidae 53 Elateridae 111 Cephaloidae 10 Gyrinidae 54 Throscidae 112 Zopheridae 13 Sphaeriidae 55 Cerophytidae 115 Tenebrionidae 14 Hydroscaphidae 56 Perothopidae 116 Alleculidae 15 Hydraenidae 57 Eucnemidae 117 Lagriidae 16 Hydrophilidae 58 Telegeusidae 118 Salpingidae 17 Géoryssidae 61 Phengodidae 119 Mycteridae 18 Sphaeritidae 62 Lampyridae 120 Pyrochroidae 1983 20 Histeridae 63 Cantharidae 121 Othniidae 21 Ptiliidae 64 Lycidae 122 Inopeplidae 22 Limulodidae 65 Derodontidae 1989 123 Oedemeridae 23 Dasyceridae 66 Nosodendridae 124 Melandryidae 24 Micropeplidae 1984 67 Dermestidae 125 Mordellidae 1986 25 Leptinidae 69 Ptinidae 126 Rhipiphoridae 26 Leiodidae 70 Anobiidae 1982 127 Meloidae 27 Scydmaenidae 71 Bostrichidae 128 Anthicidae 28 Sijphidae... 72 Lyctidae 129 Pedilidae 29 Scaphidiidae 74 Trogositidae 130 Euglenidae
    [Show full text]
  • MASS. BERRY NOTES May 2003 II
    Berry Notes is edited and articles written by Sonia Schloemann except where other contributors are noted. Publication is MASSACHUSETTS funded in part by the UMass Extension Agroecology Program and grower subscriptions. A text version can be e-mailed to BERRY NOTES you if you contact Sonia Schloemann at 413-545-4347, [email protected]. Please cite this source if reprinting May 27, 2003, Vol. 15, No. 6 information. Volume 15-- 2003 Message from the Editor: Summer Schedule: Berry Notes will appear on a weekly basis for the next 10 weeks or so. I will try to post it each Tuesday by 5:00pm. Any variation on this schedule will be announced a week ahead of time. As always, please feel free to send comments or questions about Berry Notes to me at [email protected]. Twilight Meeting: A twilight meeting will be held on Tuesday June 24, 2003 at Nourse Farms (http://www.noursefarms.com/ ) in Whately, MA starting at 5:30 pm. This meeting will showcase varieties of strawberries, raspberries, gooseberries and currants. Please contact either Nourse Farms (413-665-2658) or me (413-545-4347) for more information and directions. Crop Conditions: Strawberries: Wet weather during bloom has set the stage for high pressure for fruit rot diseases in strawberries. Regular fungicide applications during the bloom period should reduce, but may not eliminate fruit rot from the fields this year. (See the article on Botrytis Fruit Rot in the previous issue of Berry Notes) On the bright side, we have had few frost events this year (especially when compared to last year) so fruit set is very high.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxa Names List 6-30-21
    Insects and Related Organisms Sorted by Taxa Updated 6/30/21 Order Family Scientific Name Common Name A ACARI Acaridae Acarus siro Linnaeus grain mite ACARI Acaridae Aleuroglyphus ovatus (Troupeau) brownlegged grain mite ACARI Acaridae Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Fumouze & Robin) bulb mite ACARI Acaridae Suidasia nesbitti Hughes scaly grain mite ACARI Acaridae Tyrolichus casei Oudemans cheese mite ACARI Acaridae Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) mold mite ACARI Analgidae Megninia cubitalis (Mégnin) Feather mite ACARI Argasidae Argas persicus (Oken) Fowl tick ACARI Argasidae Ornithodoros turicata (Dugès) relapsing Fever tick ACARI Argasidae Otobius megnini (Dugès) ear tick ACARI Carpoglyphidae Carpoglyphus lactis (Linnaeus) driedfruit mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex bovis Stiles cattle Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex brevis Bulanova lesser Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex canis Leydig dog Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex caprae Railliet goat Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex cati Mégnin cat Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex equi Railliet horse Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex folliculorum (Simon) Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex ovis Railliet sheep Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex phylloides Csokor hog Follicle mite ACARI Dermanyssidae Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer) chicken mite ACARI Eriophyidae Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa) grain rust mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus essigi (Hassan) redberry mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus gossypii (Banks) cotton blister mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus vaccinii
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence Pattern and Susceptible Strains of Order Diptera
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(1): 33-40 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 JEZS 2018; 6(1): 33-40 Prevalence pattern and susceptible strains of © 2018 JEZS order Diptera, Lepidoptera and Coleoptera Received: 18-11-2017 Accepted: 21-12-2017 among Sarson (Brassica campestris) fields under Naureen Rana Department of Zoology, different ecological conditions Wildlife & Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan Naureen Rana, Muhammad Imran, Tahira Bakhat, Ahmad Saeed Khan, Muhammad Imran Komal Fatima, Saira Javed, Saira Fatima, Sumia Bibi and Muhammad Department of Zoology, Zafar Iqbal Wildlife & Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan Abstract The present study was conducted at Ayub Agriculture Research Institute (AARI) and village Pansera, Tahira Bakhat district Faisalabad from November, 2014 through March, 2015. Maximum population was recorded from Department of Zoology, AARI fields 51.89% (N=274) and least from Pansera fields i.e. 48.11% (N=254). Overall, significant Wildlife & Fisheries, University of Agriculture, results were recorded from AARI fields and among them, higher relative abundance (67.15%; N=184) Faisalabad, Pakistan was recorded for order Diptera. From Pensera Sarson fields, higher relative abundance (71.26%; N=181) was recorded again for order Diptera, followed by Lepidoptera (25.98%; N=66); however, least relative Ahmad Saeed Khan abundance (2.76%; N=7) was recorded for order Coleoptera. Diversity (H) was recorded maximum Department of Continuing among AARI fields (0.0685) and least was recorded among Pansera fields (0.0635). Evenness ratio was Education, University of also recorded in same context (0.0281 and 0.0264, respectively); and richness was a little bit recorded Agriculture, Faisalabad, high among Pansera fields (17.7080) and least among AARI (15.1036).
    [Show full text]
  • La Compensation Dans Les Interactions Plantes-Insectes : Modélisation, Simulation Et Expérimentation Audrey Lebon
    La compensation dans les interactions plantes-insectes : modélisation, simulation et expérimentation Audrey Lebon To cite this version: Audrey Lebon. La compensation dans les interactions plantes-insectes : modélisation, simulation et expérimentation. Biologie végétale. Université Montpellier II - Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, 2014. Français. NNT : 2014MON20161. tel-01747618 HAL Id: tel-01747618 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01747618 Submitted on 29 Mar 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Délivré par UNIVERSITE MONTPELLIER 2 Préparée au sein de l’école doctorale Sibaghe Et de l’unité de recherche AMAP (CIRAD) Spécialité : Écologie, Évolution, Ressources Génétiques, Paléontologie (EERGP) Présentée par Audrey Lebon La compensation dans les interactions plantes-insectes : modélisation, simulation et expérimentation Soutenue le 10 décembre 2014 devant le jury composé de M. Yves DUMONT, directeur de recherche, CIRAD, Montpellier Directeur de thèse M. Michel GENARD, directeur de recherche, INRA, Avignon Rapporteur M. Frédéric GROGNARD, chargé de recherche, INRIA, Sophia Antipolis Examinateur M. Serge KREITER, professeur, SupAgro, Montpellier Examinateur M. Jean-Christophe POGGIALE, professeur, AMU, Marseille Rapporteur “La r´eflexion peut nuire gravement `ala sant´e,ou du moins `ala paix de l’esprit.” Geert Kelchtermans R´esum´e La r´esistance et la tol´erance, c’est `adire la capacit´ede la plante `asupporter la pr´esence des ravageurs, sont deux moyens dont usent les plantes pour se d´efendre.
    [Show full text]
  • Pests of Berries
    Home & Garden Pest Management Guide For British Columbia 2019 Edition Chapter 11 Pests of Berries Pests of Berries This chapter describes insect and disease problems of berries, and provides information on how to manage them. The first section describes pests that affect many different berry crops, followed by sections on pests of specific berry crops. Management information describes preventative and cultural measures that may control the pest. Sometimes the management information also mentions use of pesticides. When more than one pesticide is mentioned, the least toxic pesticide is listed first. Before using a pesticide read and follow label directions, including the precautions, application rates and days-to-harvest after a pesticide application. See the “Pesticide Table” in Appendix I for information on available home garden pesticides. Also read Chapter 8 "Using Pesticides to Manage Pests". It contains important safety information. Proper identification of plant pests and diseases is an important step before attempting to control the pest. Not all plant problems are caused by pests; some are caused by cultural, nutritional, soil or environmental conditions. See Chapter 2, “Identification of Plant Problems”, for information on how to get help identifying plant problems. Pests Affecting Many Berry Crops Insects Aphids Aphids feed on most berry crops and can be significant pests. There are many species of aphids, and many feed specifically on a host crop (raspberry aphid, strawberry aphid, blueberry aphid, currant/lettuce aphid), however, some feed on a variety of crops (green peach aphid). Aphids are small (1.5 - 3 mm), pear-shaped, insects that vary in colour from pink to green and black.
    [Show full text]