June-2017.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

June-2017.Pdf “A treasure. Books about “A brilliant book . How a whip- grief are rarely funny and smart young girl handles the loss of adorable—this one is.” her mother and the reorientation of —PEOPLE MAGAZINE, her family; charming and Book of the Week beautifully written.” —KIRKUS, Starred “In Hartnett’s winning debut, a memorable young narrator’s desire “With this novel, for rationality wrestles with her [Hartnett has] become one grief. Affecting.” of my favorite writers.” —PUBLISHERS WEEKLY, —KEVIN WILSON, New York Times Starred Review bestselling author of The Family Fang “Funny and heartfelt, Rabbit Cake “This is a truly terrific and original manages adult questions with a novel about grief, family, and tween’s sense of wonder.” finding hope in the aftermath.” —MARIE CLAIRE —BOOKLIST “Darkly funny and endlessly smart.” “The most enjoyable novel I’ve —PLOUGHSHARES, read since Mr. Penumbra’s “Must-Reads for 2017” 24-Hour Bookstore!” —PETE MOCK, McIntyre’s Books available wherever books are sold · www.tinhouse.com contents JUNE 2017 UP FRONT 6 Russia’s Weaponized Fake News 22 Inside the Kremlin’s ongoing political influence campaign. BY LAURA RESTON 8 Trump the Job Killer Why is the self-proclaimed economic savior firing people? BY BRYCE COVERT 9 The Trump Tweetometer A highly precise quantitative analysis of last month’s presidential tweets. 10 The New Star Wars Our next global conflict may be fought in outer space. BY SHANNON STIRONE 12 Not So Fast, Blue Cities How Republicans are blocking efforts to raise the minimum wage. BY CLIO CHANG COLUMNS 14 The Great Democratic Divide Can elite liberals learn to embrace middle America? BY MICHAEL TOMASKY 16 The Miseducation of Liberals Don’t like Betsy DeVos? Blame the Path of Most Resistance Democrats. BY DIANE RAVITCH The opposition to Trump is winning. But can it find a way to rebuild the Democratic Party? REVIEW 50 Pew Research BY JEET HEER How to divine the political power of American evangelicals. BY JEFF SHARLET 56 Out of Office Veep tackles the shock of losing the White House. BY SARAH MARSHALL 18 30 42 58 Floatopia The Rumble in “The Only The War on Can libertarians escape government by Richmond Good Muslim Hillbillies taking to the seas? BY RACHEL RIEDERER 61 A Woman’s March Tom Perriello’s insurgent Stripped of the region’s Is a Dead Rebecca Solnit’s brilliant path toward campaign against Ralph coal and ravaged by Muslim” feminist polemic. BY CHARLOTTE SHANE Northam for Virginia drugs, the people of A meatpacking town in governor is the biggest Appalachia are fighting 64 The Teeth Gap Kansas opened its doors Democratic title bout to survive. The devastating effects of dental to refugees. Then a group since Hillary vs. Bernie. TEXT BY SARAH JONES inequality in America. BY ADAM GAFFNEY of Trump supporters PHOTOGRAPHS BY ESPEN BY ALEX SHEPHARD 66 Shimmering Visions plotted to massacre them. RASMUSSEN BY TED GENOWAYS What F. Scott Fitzgerald shared with his era’s great theorists. BY SAM TANENHAUS 72 Backstory PHOTOGRAPH BY MICHELLE SIU POETRY 70 Boardwalk Block COVER PHOTOS BY GETTY IMAGES. ABOVE, PAUL MORIGI/GETTY COVER ILLUSTRATION BY SEAN MCCABE BY ADRIENNE RAPHEL JUNE 2017 | 1 contributors Bryce Covert is economic editor at ThinkProgress and a contributor at Editor in Chief The Nation. Her writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Win McCormack Washington Post, and elsewhere. She is a recipient of a 2016 Exceptional Merit in Media Award from the National Women’s Political Caucus. Editor Eric Bates TRUMP THE JOB KILLER, P. 8 Executive Editor Literary Editor Adam Gaffney is an instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School Ryan Kearney Laura Marsh and a pulmonary and critical care physician at the Cambridge Health Politics Editor Features Directors Alliance. He’s a board member of the single-payer advocacy organization Bob Moser Sasha Belenky Theodore Ross Physicians for a National Health Program. THE TEETH GAP, P. 64 Deputy Editor Ryu Spaeth Senior Editors Brian Beutler Ted Genoways, a contributing editor at the new republic, has written Managing Editor Jeet Heer about the meatpacking industry and immigration disputes in Minnesota, Laura Reston News Editor Iowa, Nebraska, and Texas. “The issues dividing the nation,” he says, “are Social Media Editor Alex Shephard playing out in some of the least visible parts of the country.” His latest Sarah Jones Staff Writers book, This Blessed Earth: A Year in the Life of an American Family Farm, will Design Director Emily Atkin Graham Vyse be published in September. This article was produced in collaboration with Siung Tjia Josephine Livingstone the Food and Environment Reporting Network, a nonprofit investigative Photo Director Poetry Editor news organization. “THE ONLY GOOD MUSLIM IS A DEAD MUSLIM,” P. 30 Stephanie Heimann Cathy Park Hong Production Manager Espen Rasmussen is an award-winning photographer and photo editor Steph Tan Reporter-Researchers based in Norway. Between 2014 and 2016, he drove thousands of miles Clio Chang Contributing Editors Lovia Gyarkye through America’s Rust Belt, from Detroit to Beckley, West Virginia, to James Burnett, Alexander Chee, Sukjong Hong document the lives of working-class Americans. “I wanted to go to the Ben Crair, Michelle Dean, Juliet Kleber birthplace of the American dream,” he says, “to ask people if they still Siddhartha Deb, Michael Eric Dyson, Paul Ford, Ted Interns THE WAR ON HILLBILLIES, P. 42 Genoways, William Giraldi, believe in it.” Eric Armstrong Dana Goldstein, Kathryn Joyce, Naomi LaChance Suki Kim, Maria Konnikova, Sagari Shetty Diane Ravitch is a historian and professor of education at New York Corby Kummer, Michelle Legro, University. She is the author of numerous books, including, most recently, Jen Percy, Jamil Smith, Graeme Wood, Robert Wright Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools. THE MISEDUCATION OF LIBERALS, P. 16 Rachel Riederer is co-editor in chief of Guernica. She writes about Director of Marketing Director of Sales and Revenue Suzanne Wilson science, the environment, culture, and policy. Her writing has appeared in Evelyn Frison Associate Account FLOATOPIA, P. 58 The New Yorker and The Best American Essays. Audience and Executive Partnership Manager Shawn Awan Jeff Sharlet is an associate professor of English and Creative Writing at Eliza Fish Controller Dartmouth College. He has written or edited six books on American Media Relations Manager David Myer religion, the most recent of which is Radiant Truths. His work has appeared Steph Leke Office Manager, NY in The New York Times Magazine, Esquire, and GQ. PEW RESEARCH, P. 50 Associate Publisher Tori Campbell Art Stupar Sam Tanenhaus is former editor of The New York Times Book Review. He is writing a biography of William F. Buckley Jr. Publisher Hamilton Fish SHIMMERING VISIONS, P. 66 Michael Tomasky is a columnist for The Daily Beast, editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, and frequent contributor to The New York Published by Lake Avenue Publishing Review of Books. THE GREAT DEMOCRATIC DIVIDE, P. 14 1 Union Square West, New York, NY 10003 President Clarification: An article in our April 2017 issue, “Trump’s Fuzzy Border Math,” stated that Jason Win McCormack Richwine’s Ph.D. dissertation “advocated banning Hispanic immigrants because their IQs were lower than those of whites.” It was not our intention to suggest that Richwine advocated banning all Hispanic immigrants. Rather, we meant to observe that his dissertation suggested there is a “genetic component” to lower IQ scores among Hispanics and other groups, and that he For subscription inquiries or problems call (800) 827-1289 advocated using intelligence tests to bar entry to those with lower IQs. The online version of the article has been altered to clarify his opinions, including his assertion that it is “difficult to argue For reprints and licensing visit www.TNRreprints.com against” the “prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-IQ children and grandchildren.” We regret any misunderstanding that our original phrasing may have caused about his views. 2 | NEW REPUBLIC COMING SUMMER 2017 Specially curated wines for New Republic readers, delivered to your door. from the stacks AFTER DONALD TRUMP was elected president, journalists were quick to liken him to Hitler, Mussolini, and Vladimir Putin. But four months into his administra- tion, he’s starting to look more like a Georgia peanut farmer whose first term was mired in congressional gridlock. As Arthur Schlesinger Jr. explained in the new republic in 1980, Jimmy Carter had cut himself loose from the core principles that had governed the Democratic Party since FDR. He was left ideologically rudderless, mired in foreign quagmires, his domestic agenda stalled on Capitol Hill. ✯ Trump, too, is a victim of his own incompetence. He can’t hold his party together. His health care and tax reform plans are floundering, even though he, like Carter, enjoys majorities in both houses of Congress. On foreign policy, he has flailed from isolationism to intervention- ism, railing against nato one minute and bombing Syria the next. ✯ But as Schlesinger pointed out, Carter’s incompetence actually helped rescue his presidency. By bungling a crisis that prompts Americans to rally round the flag, Trump could do the same. “There are,” Schlesinger concluded, “only two reasons to shudder at the thought of four more years of Carter in the White House. One is foreign policy. The other is domestic policy.” Carter’s foreign policy ineptitude boosted him in the polls. Arthur Schlesinger Jr. The Great Carter Mystery APRIL 12, 1980 How does he do it? only by emergency treatment in New York. wistful hopes of those who thought he might Here is an administration in ruins. Here Carter let in the shah, and the Iranians, as learn on the job.
Recommended publications
  • DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America 1
    DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America 1 DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America A Report by the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. and the NAACP 2 DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) National Headquarters 99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 New York, New York 10013 212.965.2200 www.naacpldf.org The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund (LDF) is America’s premier legal organization fighting for racial justice. Through litigation, advocacy, and public education, LDF seeks structural changes to expand democracy, eliminate racial disparities, and achieve racial justice, to create a society that fulfills the promise of equality for all Americans. LDF also defends the gains and protections won over the past 70 years of civil rights struggle and works to improve the quality and diversity of judicial and executive appointments. NAACP National Headquarters 4805 Mt. Hope Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21215 410.580.5777 www.naacp.org Founded in 1909, the NAACP is the nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization. Our mission is to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate racial discrimination. For over one hundred years, the NAACP has remained a visionary grassroots and national organization dedicated to ensuring freedom and social justice for all Americans. Today, with over 1,200 active NAACP branches across the nation, over 300 youth and college groups, and over 250,000 members, the NAACP remains one of the largest and most vibrant civil rights organizations in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Branch
    EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, Senator from Illinois and 44th President of the United States; born in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 4, 1961; received a B.A. in 1983 from Columbia University, New York City; worked as a community organizer in Chicago, IL; studied law at Harvard University, where he became the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review, and received a J.D. in 1991; practiced law in Chicago, IL; lecturer on constitutional law, University of Chicago; member, Illinois State Senate, 1997–2004; elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2004; and served from January 3, 2005, to November 16, 2008, when he resigned from office, having been elected President; family: married to Michelle; two children: Malia and Sasha; elected as President of the United States on November 4, 2008, and took the oath of office on January 20, 2009. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500 Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500, phone (202) 456–1414, http://www.whitehouse.gov The President of the United States.—Barack H. Obama. Special Assistant to the President and Personal Aide to the President.— Anita Decker Breckenridge. Director of Oval Office Operations.—Brian Mosteller. OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT phone (202) 456–1414 The Vice President.—Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to the Vice President.—Bruce Reed, EEOB, room 276, 456–9000. Deputy Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to Dr. Jill Biden.—Sheila Nix, EEOB, room 200, 456–7458.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003
    THE REGIME CHANGE CONSENSUS: IRAQ IN AMERICAN POLITICS, 1990-2003 Joseph Stieb A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Wayne Lee Michael Morgan Benjamin Waterhouse Daniel Bolger Hal Brands ©2019 Joseph David Stieb ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joseph David Stieb: The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003 (Under the direction of Wayne Lee) This study examines the containment policy that the United States and its allies imposed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War and argues for a new understanding of why the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. At the core of this story is a political puzzle: Why did a largely successful policy that mostly stripped Iraq of its unconventional weapons lose support in American politics to the point that the policy itself became less effective? I argue that, within intellectual and policymaking circles, a claim steadily emerged that the only solution to the Iraqi threat was regime change and democratization. While this “regime change consensus” was not part of the original containment policy, a cohort of intellectuals and policymakers assembled political support for the idea that Saddam’s personality and the totalitarian nature of the Baathist regime made Iraq uniquely immune to “management” strategies like containment. The entrenchment of this consensus before 9/11 helps explain why so many politicians, policymakers, and intellectuals rejected containment after 9/11 and embraced regime change and invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Kos Recommended Nancy Pelosi Very Smart
    Daily Kos Recommended Nancy Pelosi Very Smart Is Cooper unspelled or ill-treated after untaught Caleb proselyte so unneedfully? Jesus grizzles stiltedly. Townie never soundproofs any remilitarizations objectifies bountifully, is Ferdinand dinky and unstinting enough? Despite its water on daily kos purged and death With aging of toast and federal funds for his presence in an abundance signals an investigation points here biden takes our very smart as they kept asking the election was an admission of. Black districts across to country. Kremlin and lunar are designed to today our election. Trump in daily kos recommended nancy pelosi very smart person to overturn election machine in the intransigence even. Mnuchin defies legal counsel kenneth starr two dust and ignore or indication that are continuing nightmare scenario has now retired judges are? RATHER THAN FACING UP TO REALITY THAT WE MAY NOT WIN THIS WAR THAT HE SAYS WE CAN WIN. He promises her to embrace of a topic. Most television networks cut away increase the statement President Trump gave Thursday night from the rail House briefing room usually the grounds that except he keep saying also not true. France will aim first, where defence sec declares. Russian agent and have started by private equity gap is a deliberate as a formal pledge did? Just cancel His Advisers. Today on Fox: the scramble for Parler. Did with nancy pelosi and cheny have celebrated as florida on daily kos recommended nancy pelosi very smart also. Bloomberg reporter jennifer rubin long and learn about? Like anything other issues, people of fell and upcoming in between will be disproportionately and negatively impacted by county new restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a More Democratic Congress?
    TOWARD A MORE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS? OUR IMPERFECT DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTION: THE CRITICS EXAMINED STEPHEN MACEDO* INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 609 I. SENATE MALAPPORTIONMENT AND POLITICAL EQUALITY................. 611 II. IN DEFENSE OF THE SENATE................................................................ 618 III. CONSENT AS A DEMOCRATIC VIRTUE ................................................. 620 IV. REDISTRICTING AND THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE REFORM? ................ 620 V. THE PROBLEM OF GRIDLOCK, MINORITY VETOES, AND STATUS- QUO BIAS: UNCLOGGING THE CHANNELS OF POLITICAL CHANGE?.... 622 CONCLUSION................................................................................................... 627 INTRODUCTION There is much to admire in the work of those recent scholars of constitutional reform – including Sanford Levinson, Larry Sabato, and prior to them, Robert Dahl – who propose to reinvigorate our democracy by “correcting” and “revitalizing” our Constitution. They are right to warn that “Constitution worship” should not supplant critical thinking and sober assessment. There is no doubt that our 220-year-old founding charter – itself the product of compromise and consensus, and not only scholarly musing – could be improved upon. Dahl points out that in 1787, “[h]istory had produced no truly relevant models of representative government on the scale the United States had already attained, not to mention the scale it would reach in years to come.”1 Political science has since progressed; as Dahl also observes, none of us “would hire an electrician equipped only with Franklin’s knowledge to do our wiring.”2 But our political plumbing is just as archaic. I, too, have participated in efforts to assess the state of our democracy, and co-authored a work that offers recommendations, some of which overlap with * Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Center for Human Values; Director of the University Center for Human Values, Princeton University.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Converence on Aging Final Report
    These files are undergoing remediation for compliance with Section 508. The remediation will be complete by January 5, 2016. In the interim, should you require any accessibility assistance with the file, please contact FINAL REPORT Rachel Maisler at [email protected] or 202-619-3636. Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 The 2015 White House Conference on Aging ........................................................................................................................... 1 Public Input & Regional Forums ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Looking to the Future ........................................................................................................................................................................3 II. Public and Private Action to Support Older Americans ...............................................................................................................5 Public Initiatives .................................................................................................................................................................................5 Retirement Security ...................................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • All-In Nation: an America That Works For
    All-In Nation An America that Works for All a collaboration between tHe center for american progress and policylink edited by vanessa c árdenas and saraH treuHaft All-In Nation An America that Works for All a collaboration between tHe center for american progress and policylink edited by vanessa c árdenas and saraH treuHaft Table of Preface vii Executive 1 by angela glover Summary Contents blackwell and by vanessa cárdenas neera tanden and Julie Ajinkya cHapter one 7 cHapter TWO 25 cHapter tHree 31 Creating an Charting New America’s Future All-In Nation Trends and Workforce by ruy teixeira and Imagining an by antHony carnevale JoHn Halpin All-In Nation and nicole smitH by robert lyncH and patrick oakford An Equity-Focused 49 cHapter FOUR 53 cHapter five 79 Policy Agenda for Infrastructure: Building Healthy America Supporting Communities Communities for So All Can Thrive a Healthy Nation by saraH treuHaft by stepHanie boarden and erin Hagan 50 personal essay Gov. Ed REndEll (d-PA) 76 personal essay dR. RoBERT Ross cHapter six 107 cHapter seven 139 cHapter eigHt 165 Education and Job Jobs, Income, and Americans in Readiness for a Assets: Economic Waiting: Immigration Prosperous America Security for All Reform for a by melissa lazarín by cHristian weller, saraH Stronger Nation treuHaft, and Julie Ajinkya by vanessa cárdenas and 104 personal essay Jeanne butterfield GEoffREy CAnAdA 134 personal essay lAwREnCE summERs 162 personal essay Ai-jEn Poo cHapter nine 195 cHapter ten 225 Conclusion 249 Locked-Up Potential: Democratic by carl cHancellor
    [Show full text]
  • Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News Kathy Elrick Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 12-2016 Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News Kathy Elrick Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Elrick, Kathy, "Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News" (2016). All Dissertations. 1847. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1847 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IRONIC FEMINISM: RHETORICAL CRITIQUE IN SATIRICAL NEWS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Rhetorics, Communication, and Information Design by Kathy Elrick December 2016 Accepted by Dr. David Blakesley, Committee Chair Dr. Jeff Love Dr. Brandon Turner Dr. Victor J. Vitanza ABSTRACT Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News aims to offer another perspective and style toward feminist theories of public discourse through satire. This study develops a model of ironist feminism to approach limitations of hegemonic language for women and minorities in U.S. public discourse. The model is built upon irony as a mode of perspective, and as a function in language, to ferret out and address political norms in dominant language. In comedy and satire, irony subverts dominant language for a laugh; concepts of irony and its relation to comedy situate the study’s focus on rhetorical contributions in joke telling. How are jokes crafted? Who crafts them? What is the motivation behind crafting them? To expand upon these questions, the study analyzes examples of a select group of popular U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Independents Send Letter to DNC Chair Tom Perez You Can Add Your Voice Today!
    The Hub - Online Newsletter of Independent Voting December 17, 2018 Independents Send Letter to DNC Chair Tom Perez You can add your voice today! Jackie Salit, the President of Independent Voting, invited leaders and activists of Independent Voting to join her in sending a letter to Tom Perez, chair of the Democratic National Committee . The letter asks Perez to meet with a group of independent leaders and take the decisive step of opening the 2020 presidential primaries and caucuses to independent voters. Sent to Tom Perez on Wednesday, December 12, the letter was signed by 270 activists from 46 states and Washington, DC as part of the Eyes on 2020 campaign. The campaign aims to bring the issue of Jackie Salit independents' participation in the 2020 presidential primaries center stage. It comes in the wake of the midterm elections where independents played a decisive role in Democrats regaining control of the House for the first time in 10 years. The letter states: "While we, the undersigned, make no pledge or commitment with regard to supporting any particular 2020 presidential candidate ­­ Democratic, Republican, minor party or independent ­­ we believe the time has come for both governing parties, and for the Democratic Party in particular, to take the decisive step of opening the 2020 presidential primaries to independents. Your Tom Perez party has announced that its first order of business in the new Congress will be the introduction of HB1, a political reform bill. However, to be a truly inclusive democracy, non­aligned voters must have full access to the electoral process, which HB1 does not address." To read the full letter, click here.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Media Law & Ethics
    UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW JOURNAL OF MEDIA LAW & ETHICS Editor ERIC B. EASTON, PROFESSOR EMERITUS University of Baltimore School of Law EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS BENJAMIN BENNETT-CARPENTER, Special Lecturer, Oakland Univ. (Michigan) STUART BROTMAN, Distinguished Professor of Media Management & Law, Univ. of Tennessee L. SUSAN CARTER, Professor Emeritus, Michigan State University ANTHONY FARGO, Associate Professor, Indiana University AMY GAJDA, Professor of Law, Tulane University STEVEN MICHAEL HALLOCK, Professor of Journalism, Point Park University MARTIN E. HALSTUK, Professor Emeritus, Pennsylvania State University CHRISTOPHER HANSON, Associate Professor, University of Maryland ELLIOT KING, Professor, Loyola University Maryland JANE KIRTLEY, Silha Professor of Media Ethics & Law, University of Minnesota NORMAN P. LEWIS, Associate Professor, University of Florida KAREN M. MARKIN, Dir. of Research Development, University of Rhode Island KIRSTEN MOGENSEN, Associate Professor, Roskilde University (Denmark) KATHLEEN K. OLSON, Professor, Lehigh University RICHARD J. PELTZ-STEELE, Chancellor Professor, Univ. of Mass. School of Law JAMES LYNN STEWART, Professor, Nicholls State University CHRISTOPHER R. TERRY, Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota DOREEN WEISENHAUS, Associate Professor, Northwestern University UB Journal of Media Law & Ethics, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Fall/Winter 2020) 1 Submissions The University of Baltimore Journal of Media Law & Ethics (ISSN1940-9389) is an on-line, peer- reviewed journal published quarterly by the University of Baltimore School of Law. JMLE seeks theoretical and analytical manuscripts that advance the understanding of media law and ethics in society. Submissions may have a legal, historical, or social science orientation, but must focus on media law or ethics. All theoretical perspectives are welcome. All manuscripts undergo blind peer review.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Bridget Christine Gelms Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ Dr. Jason Palmeri, Director ______________________________________ Dr. Tim Lockridge, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Lisa Weems, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT VOLATILE VISIBILITY: THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE HARASSMENT ON FEMINIST CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE by Bridget C. Gelms As our digital environments—in their inhabitants, communities, and cultures—have evolved, harassment, unfortunately, has become the status quo on the internet (Duggan, 2014 & 2017; Jane, 2014b). Harassment is an issue that disproportionately affects women, particularly women of color (Citron, 2014; Mantilla, 2015), LGBTQIA+ women (Herring et al., 2002; Warzel, 2016), and women who engage in social justice, civil rights, and feminist discourses (Cole, 2015; Davies, 2015; Jane, 2014a). Whitney Phillips (2015) notes that it’s politically significant to pay attention to issues of online harassment because this kind of invective calls “attention to dominant cultural mores” (p. 7). Keeping our finger on the pulse of such attitudes is imperative to understand who is excluded from digital publics and how these exclusions perpetuate racism and sexism to “preserve the internet as a space free of politics and thus free of challenge to white masculine heterosexual hegemony” (Higgin, 2013, n.p.). While rhetoric and writing as a field has a long history of examining myriad exclusionary practices that occur in public discourses, we still have much work to do in understanding how online harassment, particularly that which is gendered, manifests in digital publics and to what rhetorical effect.
    [Show full text]