DOCSLIB.ORG

Virtual Public Hearing Pre-Recorded Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Virtual Public Hearing Pre-Recorded Presentation Interstate Highway (I) 45 from the Galveston Causeway Bridge to 61st Street Galveston County, Texas CSJs: 0500-01-119 I-45March Galveston 4, 2021 Improvement Public Hearing Project March 4, 2021 Script: Welcome to the Texas Department of Transportation Houston District’s virtual public hearing for the Interstate Highway 45 Galveston Improvement project, from the Galveston Causeway Bridge to 61st Street. This is a pre-recorded presentation. My name is Celeste Johnston, I am part of the consultant team working on this project on behalf of the Texas Department of Transportation and I would like to welcome you and thank you for participating in this virtual public hearing. A public meeting was held for this project in August 2020. This hearing presentation is available for viewing starting on March 4, 2021. During the virtual hearing, you may pause the presentation and navigate forward or backward using your video player. 1 I-45 Galveston Improvement Project Virtual Public Hearing I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 2 Script: This Virtual Public Hearing is being held to describe the proposed project, present the preferred alternative, and gather public input. This hearing is required under Texas Administrative Code Title 43, Chapter 2, Subchapter E, Rule 2.107 because of the addition of bicycle lanes as part of the proposed project, which is considered under the State code as a “substantial change in function”. 2 I-45 Galveston Improvement Project Agenda • Welcome • COVID-19 Response • Project Overview • Environmental Overview • Project Next Steps • Public Comment Process • Closing Remarks I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 3 Script: In this presentation, I will describe the proposed project, provide an overview of the environmental studies being performed, explain the next steps in the project development process, and outline the methods for submitting comments. 3 Public Hearing Questions and Concerns Please phone 713-802-5242 if you have: . Problems accessing public hearing information online . Requests for special accommodations . Language or interpretation needs other than English and Spanish Discussion with project staff will not be included in the official record of the public hearing. I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 4 Script: If you experience technical difficulties with the virtual public hearing, please call 713-802-5242. You may also request special accommodations, assistance accessing public hearing information and materials, and language interpretation needs other than English and Spanish. Please note, discussion with project staff will not be included in the official record of this public hearing. If members of the public wish to submit a comment to be part of the official record of this public hearing they may do so in the ways outlined on the next slide. 4 How to Submit Your Comments All comments must be received or postmarked by Friday, March 19, 2021. I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 5 Script: All verbal and written comments must be received or postmarked before the comment period closes on Friday, March 19, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. You can submit comments in the following ways: • Via email to [email protected] • Via mail to the TxDOT Houston District, Attention: Advanced Project Development Director, P.O. Box 1386, Houston, Texas, 77251-1386 • By calling 713-955-7814 and leaving a voicemail. • Online by visiting www.TxDOT.gov and searching in the upper right-hand search box for “I-45 Galveston.” Click on the email link at the bottom of the project page to open the comment form. Responses to comments received during the comment period will be included in the Virtual Public Hearing Summary report that will be posted on the project webpage approximately three months after the close of the comment period. The project webpage is www.txdot.gov; key word search I-45 Galveston.” 5 Virtual Public Hearing in Response to Public Health TxDOT changed the traditional in-person public hearing to an online format in response to the COVID-19 outbreak This virtual public hearing and information on TxDOT’s project webpage provides the same information as an in-person hearing would have, including: » Project information » Recorded presentation » Proposed schematic » Estimated project timeframe » Process for submitting comments » Key contacts I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 6 Script: Given the unique circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic, along with the department’s commitment to protecting public health during this national emergency, TxDOT is conducting this virtual public hearing to avoid in-person contact. At this time, an online public hearing is being conducted in-lieu of an in-person public hearing. This presentation covers the same information that the Houston District would have presented at an in-person public hearing. The comment process for the virtual public hearing will be described near the end of this presentation. All hearing materials can be found on TxDOT’s project web page on the I-45 Galveston Improvement Project hearing notice page. The web page for the project is www.txdot.gov; key word search “I-45 Galveston.” 6 I-45 Galveston Improvement Project Outreach/Notification Methods . Virtual Public Hearing Notice was published in: – Galveston Daily News on Thursday, February 18, 2021 . Elected Official Letters were e-mailed on Friday, February 12, 2021 . Information was posted to the TxDOT website on March 4, 2021 . Notices were mailed to adjacent property owners on Friday, February 12, 2021 . Website Postings . Social Media . Community Outreach – Island Community Center – Local library, grocery stores and churches – Chamber of Commerce I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 7 Script: The notice for this public hearing was published in the Galveston Daily News on Thursday, February 18, 2021. Elected Official Letters were e-mailed on Friday, February 12, 2021. Information was posted to the TxDOT webpage on March 4, 2021. Notices were mailed directly to adjacent property owners on Friday, February 12, 2021. Additional outreach for this virtual public hearing included posting notices at the Rosenberg library, the Island Community Center, and local grocery stores. Notices advertising the virtual public hearing were emailed to the Galveston Chamber of Commerce and local churches that offer services in English and Spanish. 7 Memorandum of Understanding National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Assignment to the Texas Department of Transportation The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 9, 2019, and executed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and TxDOT. I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 8 Script: The I-45 Galveston Improvement Project is receiving federal funds, and because of the federal component, TxDOT is required to assess the potential environmental effects of the proposed project in accordance with Federal standards. The process that is followed is called the National Environmental Policy Act process, otherwise known as NEPA. The NEPA process provides analyses of the potential impacts to the natural and manmade environment and helps to inform the decision makers whether or not to proceed with the project. On December 9, 2019, TxDOT received a signed Memorandum of Understanding from the Federal Highway Administration that permits TxDOT to assume responsibility from the Federal Highway Administration for reviewing and approving certain assigned NEPA projects. This review and approval process applies to this project. 8 I-45 Galveston Improvement Project Overview I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 9 Script: The project's study limits extend along I-45 from the Galveston Causeway Bridge to 61st street, a distance of approximately 2.5 miles. The project is located in Galveston County. The project area consists of existing roadway ROW, developed land, and adjacent parcels of coastal marsh and open water. Land use surrounding the proposed project include industrial, residential, commercial, and vacant lots. 9 Background of the I-45 Galveston Improvement Project I-45 Galveston Improvement Project March 4, 2021 10 Script: The slide shows a timeline of the I-45 Galveston Improvement Project. The roadway design and environmental analysis for this project was initiated at the beginning of 2020. A virtual public meeting was held on August 11, 2020 to present the project to the public and to solicit comments. Documentation of this public meeting can be found on the project webpage. Following the public meeting TxDOT continued to refine the schematic and environmental analysis. This virtual public hearing is being held to present the proposed improvements and the findings of the environmental analysis, and to receive your comments on the proposed project. 10 Project Purpose and Need Project Need . Increased and projected growth in the area causes traffic demand to exceed capacity of the existing roadway . Current roadway layout (the geometry of the main lanes, frontage roads, intersections and ramps) creates operational issues such as congestion at the intersections, congestion on the main lanes, and access issues to adjacent neighborhoods . Facility currently has limited bicycle and pedestrian accommodations . Improve hurricane evacuation Project Purpose
Recommended publications
  • Fen Causeway

    Fen Causeway

    Fen Causeway An important vehicular route which crosses the attractive rural spaces of Coe Fen and Sheep’s Green with views back towards the city. Fen Causeway was built in as one of the main routes the 1920s to link Newnham around Cambridge, but the village with Trumpington negative effect of this traffic Road and to provide access is mitigated by the pastural to the south of the city. Its setting and the views of the construction was the subject River Cam with the historic of fierce local opposition city centre beyond. at the time. The road was built on the line of Coe Fen Lane, which joined the footpaths that crossed Coe Fen and Sheep’s Green. Today the road is very busy Fen Causeway SIGNIFICANCE - SIGNIFICANT General Overview At its eastern end Fen Causeway passes between the large properties of the Leys School to the south and the Royal Cambridge Hotel and University Department of Engineering to the north. Although the hotel is built up against the pavement, the car parks to the rear provide a large open space, whilst the school and engineering department stand back from the road behind high walls. The setback makes the street a light space, although the high buildings to either side channel views along the street in both directions. The grounds on either side provide greenery that softens the streetscene. The Royal Cambridge Hotel North House of the Leys School provides architectural interest as part of the late Victorian Methodist School complex, built in red brick with exuberant stone and brick detailing which provides a strong vertical emphasis.
  • Evaluation of Green Colored Bicycle Lanes in Florida

    Evaluation of Green Colored Bicycle Lanes in Florida

    Florida Department of Transportation Evaluation of Green Colored Bicycle Lanes in Florida FDOT Office State Materials Office Report Number FL/DOT/SMO 17-581 Authors Edward Offei Guangming Wang Charles Holzschuher Date of Publication April 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................... 3 TEST EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................................... 4 DYNAMIC FRICTION TESTER (DFT) ................................................................................... 4 CIRCULAR TRACK METER (CTM) ......................................................................................
  • High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing

    High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing

    High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing Project #: RES2016-05 Final Report Submitted to Tennessee Department of Transportation Principal Investigator (PI) Deo Chimba, PhD., P.E., PTOE. Tennessee State University Phone: 615-963-5430 Email: [email protected] Co-Principal Investigator (Co-PI) Janey Camp, PhD., P.E., GISP, CFM Vanderbilt University Phone: 615-322-6013 Email: [email protected] July 10, 2018 DISCLAIMER This research was funded through the State Research and Planning (SPR) Program by the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration under RES2016-05: High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the United States Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The State of Tennessee and the United States Government assume no liability of its contents or use thereof. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who are solely responsible for the facts and accuracy of the material presented. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Tennessee Department of Transportation or the United States Department of Transportation. ii Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. RES2016-05 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date: March 2018 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Deo Chimba and Janey Camp TDOT PROJECT # RES2016-05 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering; Tennessee State University 11.
  • Existing Mainline & Streetscape

    Existing Mainline & Streetscape

    EXISTING MAINLINE & STREETSCAPE Features Village of Hillside Village of Westchester Village of Bellwood Village of Broadview Village of Maywood Village of Forest Park Village of Oak Park City of Chicago www.eisenhowerexpressway.com HILLSIDE I-290 MAINLINE I-290 Looking West North Wolf Road I-290 East of Mannheim Road - Retaining Walls Underpass at I-290 - Noise Wall I-290 I-290 Looking West IHB R.R, Crossing I-290 Westbound approaching I-88 Interchange EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES I-290 Looking West I-290 East side of Mannheim Road Interchange 2 www.eisenhowerexpressway.com CROSS ROADS OTHER FEATURES HILLSIDE Mannheim Road Mannheim Road Bridge, sidewalk and fence over I-290 Hillside Welcome Signage Mannheim Road Mannheim Road Bridge, sidewalk and fence over I-290 Hillside Marker at I-290 Mannheim Road Northbound - Hillside Markers at I-290 EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES 3 www.eisenhowerexpressway.com WESTCHESTER I-290 MAINLINE I-290 EB CD Road I-290 EB CD Road Entrance I-290 Looking East - Westchester Boulevard Overpass Noise walls along Wedgewood Drive EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES 4 www.eisenhowerexpressway.com CROSSROADS/FRONTAGE ROADS WESTCHESTER Bellwood Avenue Westchester Boulevard Bridge, sidewalk, wall and fencing over I-290 Looking North towards I-290 overpass Westchester Boulevard Mannheim Road Looking South Looking Southeast EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES
  • Economic Impact to Barge Operators and Shippers of Closing the GIWW

    Economic Impact to Barge Operators and Shippers of Closing the GIWW

    0-6807-WP White Paper: Economic Impact to Barge Operators and Shippers of Closing the GIWW TxDOT Project 0-6807, Texas Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Master Plan PUBLISHED: March 2016 TO: Kevin Pete, Project Manager Research and Technology Implementation Office, TxDOT COPY TO: Sylvia Medina, Research and Technology Implementation Office, TxDOT Justin Malnar, Research Development Office, TTI Erlinda Olivarez, Research Development Office, TTI FROM: Jim Kruse, Research Supervisor FOR MORE INFORMATION: Name: Jim Kruse Phone: 713-613-9210 Email: [email protected] 1 WHITE PAPER Task Purpose This task analyzed the effect that the March 22, 2014, collision and oil spill in the Houston Ship Channel had on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) barge shipments. Because the incident is so recent, the scope of the analysis was somewhat constrained due to data availability. This task report discusses the following topics: The events of March 22, 2014, and the following days. The effect of the incident on barge traffic flows. Transit delays for shipments already on the water and the cost of those delays. Shipments that were postponed because of the channel closure. Decontamination requirements. Background—The Incident At 12:35 p.m. on March 22, 2014, a collision occurred in the Houston Ship Channel just inside the junction known as the Texas City “Y.” This is an extremely busy intersection of various shipping lanes, both deep sea and shallow draft. Figure 1 shows the location of the accident, as well as the routing for the various ship channels and the GIWW in that area. 2 Figure 1. Map of Ship Channels in Vicinity of Oil Spill.
  • Recommended Ramp Design Procedures for Facilities Without Frontage Roads

    Recommended Ramp Design Procedures for Facilities Without Frontage Roads

    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4538-3 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date RECOMMENDED RAMP DESIGN PROCEDURES FOR September 2004 FACILITIES WITHOUT FRONTAGE ROADS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. J. Bonneson, K. Zimmerman, C. Messer, and M. Wooldridge Report 0-4538-3 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 0-4538 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2002 - August 2004 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Ramp Design Considerations for Facilities without Frontage Roads 16. Abstract Based on a recent change in Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) policy, frontage roads are not to be included along controlled-access highways unless a study indicates that the frontage road improves safety, improves operations, lowers overall facility costs, or provides essential access. Interchange design options that do not include frontage roads are to be considered for all new freeway construction. Ramps in non- frontage-road settings can be more challenging to design than those in frontage-road settings for several reasons. Adequate ramp length, appropriate horizontal and vertical curvature, and flaring to increase storage area at the crossroad intersection should all be used to design safe and efficient ramps for non-frontage-road settings.
  • Stormwater Runoff from Bridges Final Report to Joint Legislation Transportation Oversight Committee in Fulfillment of Session Law 2008‐107

    Stormwater Runoff from Bridges Final Report to Joint Legislation Transportation Oversight Committee in Fulfillment of Session Law 2008‐107

    Stormwater Runoff from Bridges Final Report to Joint Legislation Transportation Oversight Committee In Fulfillment of Session Law 2008‐107 Prepared by: URS Corporation – North Carolina 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 400 Morrisville, NC 27560 Prepared for: NC Department of Transportation Hydraulics Unit 1590 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699‐1590 919.707.6700 July 2010 (May 2012) Cover Photos: C. dubia photo provided by Jack Kelly Clark, courtesy of University of California Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program. All other photos by authors. This page intentionally left blank Stormwater Runoff from Bridges Final Report Revision History Date Description May 9, 2012 Errors in the calculation of unit event loads, annual loading rates, and runoff volumes were corrected. The following updates associated with the corrections were incorporated: Pages 4‐9 through 4‐16 in section 4 were updated, including all text and tables: o Table 4.2‐2 on pages 4‐10 through 4‐13 was updated with corrected median unit event loads and average unit annual loading rates. o Table 4.2‐3 on page 4‐14 was updated with corrected annual loading rate values. o Table 4.2‐4 on page 4‐16 was updated with corrected annual loading rate values. All tables in Appendix 3‐G (Tables 3‐G.1 to 3‐G.15) were updated with corrected runoff volume values. This page intentionally left blank Stormwater Runoff from Bridges Final Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................ES-1
  • Emergency Operations Plan Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness January 2019 Review and Updated January 2019

    Emergency Operations Plan Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness January 2019 Review and Updated January 2019

    St. Tammany Parish Emergency Operations Plan Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness January 2019 Review and Updated January 2019 ST. TAMMANY PARISH TABLE OF CONTENTS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Table of Contents Promulgation Statement ....................................................................................................... viii Concurrence ............................................................................................................................ x Foreword ............................................................................................................................... xix Record of Changes ................................................................................................................. xxi Record of Distribution .......................................................................................................... xxiii Basic Plan ................................................................................................................................ 1 I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE .......................................................................................................... 1 II. SITUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................... 2 III. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS ................................................................................................... 4 IV. ORGANIZATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................... 5 V. DIRECTION AND CONTROL
  • High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Evaluation Ii

    High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Evaluation Ii

    HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANES EVALUATION II Traffic Impact, Safety Assessment, and Public Acceptance Dr. Peter T. Martin, Associate Professor University of Utah Dhruvajyoti Lahon, Aleksandar Stevanovic, Research Assistants University of Ut ah Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Utah Traffic Lab 122 South Central Campus Drive Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 November 2004 Acknowledgements The authors thank the Utah Department of Transportation employees for the data they furnished and their assistance with this study. The authors particularly thank the Technical Advisory Committee members for their invaluable input throughout the study. The authors are also thankful to the respondents who took the time to participate in the public opinion survey. The valuable contribution of those who helped collect data and conduct public opinion surveys is greatly appreciated. Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 1.1 Background................................................................................................................1
  • Green Infrastructure Design for Transport Projects: a Road Map To

    Green Infrastructure Design for Transport Projects: a Road Map To

    GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN FOR TRANSPORT PROJECTS A ROAD MAP TO PROTECTING ASIA’S WILDLIFE BIODIVERSITY DECEMBER 2019 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN FOR TRANSPORT PROJECTS A ROAD MAP TO PROTECTING ASIA’S WILDLIFE BIODIVERSITY DECEMBER 2019 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2019 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2019. ISBN 978-92-9261-991-6 (print), 978-92-9261-992-3 (electronic) Publication Stock No. TCS189222 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TCS189222 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
  • Upgrading the Avon River Causeway During Highway 101 Twinning

    Upgrading the Avon River Causeway During Highway 101 Twinning

    Upgrading the Avon River Causeway During Highway 101 Twinning Dr. Bob Pett, NSTIR Environmental Services Alexander Wilson, CBCL Limited Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal Partner with NS Agriculture 9.5 km 6 lanes PEI Moncton NB Northumberland Strait Petitcodiac River NS Chignecto Bay Minas Basin Bay of Fundy Avon River Windsor Fundy Tides Salty- Silty Lake Pesaquid 1970 Fresh water Impacts on the Windsor Salt Marsh (Ramsar Wetland & IBA of Canada) Unlike the Petitcodiac – keeping an aboiteau EA completed in 2017 – currently working on design Project in planning for almost 20 years – including various environmental studies of the Avon River Estuary Contracted Acadia University, St. Mary’s University and CBWES Inc., between 2002 and 2018 to better understand the estuary and inform our design team to minimize impacts on salt marsh and mudflats. Baseline CRA Fisheries Study (Commercial, Recreational and Aboriginal) Contracted 3 partners for work between April 2017 and March 2019 ➢ Darren Porter, commercial fisher, ➢ Acadia University (Dr. Trevor Avery) ➢ Mi’kmaq Conservation Group Key study goal to better inform the detailed design team to improve fish passage through the aboiteau (sluice) Just before Christmas 2017, we engaged a team led by CBCL Limited to design an upgraded causeway and aboiteau system. Design Objectives Public Safety • Maintain corridor over Avon River for Highway 101 Twinning and continuity of rail, trail and utility services. • Continued protection of communities and agricultural land from the effects of flooding and sea level rise / climate change. Regulatory Requirements • Improve fish passage (EA Condition & Fisheries Act ). • Minimize environmental impacts (i.e., impact to salt marsh). • Consideration of potential negative impacts to asserted or established Mi’kmaq aboriginal or treaty rights.
  • Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More Effective Transportation Project Evaluation

    Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More Effective Transportation Project Evaluation

    Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More Effective Transportation Project Evaluation BDK85 977-21 Final Report December 2011 i Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More Effective Transportation Project Evaluation BDK85 977-21 Final Report Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation Research Center 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Project Manager: Amy Datz Prepared by: Victoria A. Perk Joseph S. DeSalvo, Ph.D. Tara A. Rodrigues Nina M. Verzosa Steven C. Bovino Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT-100 Tampa, FL 33620-5375 December 2011 i DRAFT October 2011 ii DISCLAIMER The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation. iii iv Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Improving Value of Travel Time Savings Estimation for More December 2011 Effective Transportation Project Evaluation 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Victoria A. Perk, Joseph S. DeSalvo, Tara A. Rodrigues, Nina M. Verzosa, Steven C. Bovino 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT-100 11. Contract or Grant No. Tampa, FL 33620 BDK85 977-21 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Florida Department of Transportation Final Report Research Center March 2010 – December 2011 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30 14.