Integrating Pharmacogenetics Into Society: in Search of a Model

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrating Pharmacogenetics Into Society: in Search of a Model F OCUS ON PHARMACOGENETICS 29. Jones, B. C. et al. Quantitative-trait loci Acknowledgements and selling a range of specialist services to analysis of cocaine-related behaviours and Supported by National Institutes of Health grants. neurochemistry. Pharmacogenetics 9, 607–617 the pharmaceutical industry. This core Competing interests statement (1999). group is described in TABLE 1.Most of these 30. Port, J. D. & Bristow, M. R. Altered β-adrenergic The author declares no competing financial interests. receptor gene regulation and signaling in chronic heart firms have been formed since 1997 and are failure. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 33, 887–905 Online Links mainly located in the United States. Between (2001). 31. van Campen, L. C., Visser, F. C. & Visser, C. A. DATABASES 1997 and 2000, there was a steady growth in Ejection fraction improvement by β-blocker treatment The following terms in this article are linked online to: in patients with heart failure: an analysis of studies Entrez Gene: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/ the number of small to medium enterprises published in the literature. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. query.fcgi?db=gene working with PGx. However, in 2001 this 32 Suppl. 1, S31–S35 (1998). ADRB1 | ADRB2 | CFTR | CYP1A2 | CYP2D6 | CYP2E1 | 32. Mason, D. A., Moore, J. D., Green, S. A. & CYP3A4 | TPMT | growth slowed, and in 2002 consolidation of Liggett, S. B. A gain-of-function polymorphism in a OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/ the sector started to take place, with five β query.fcgi?db=OMIM G-protein coupling domain of the human 1- adrenergic receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 274, cystic fibrosis mergers and acquisitions of small PGx firms 12670–12674 (1999). Access to this interactive links box is free online. between 2001 and 2002. Secondly, there are about 30 large pharma- ceutical companies who are investing in PGx, either internally or through collaborations SCIENCE AND SOCIETY with smaller PGx firms. The main players — primarily global firms — are listed in BOX 1. GlaxoSmithKline, Roche and Pfizer are among Integrating pharmacogenetics into the larger investors in this technology. How- ever, it should be stressed that investment by major pharmaceutical companies can be mea- society: in search of a model sured along a ‘spectrum’ of commitment, with some companies more committed to PGx than Andrew Webster, Paul Martin, Graham Lewis and Andrew Smart others, at this point in time. In addition to these two main groups, a number of specialist Abstract | There has been considerable Health Pharmacogenetics Research Network, diagnostic companies (for example, Beckton scientific, corporate and policy interest in as well as among national health policy agen- Dickinson) and US health-care providers (for the more effective use of genetics in cies, as indicated by the UK government’s example, Kaiser Permanente) are also investing both drug development and delivery. recent White Paper on the introduction of in the technology through the formation of Pharmacogenetics — the study of the PGx (and other genetic techniques) into the collaborations with smaller firms. relationship between an individual’s genetic health service2. Since the first collaboration on PGx makeup and response to medicinal drugs — PGx is on the threshold of making a major between Genset and Abbott in 1997, a fur- has attracted global interest, but will it live up impact in commercial labs and in the clinic. ther 180 industrial alliances have been to its promise? Looking beyond the hype that But, despite its promise and the heavy invest- formed around the technology. A similar has accompanied much of the commentary ment made in the technology, many compa- pattern to the growth of dedicated firms can in the area, the future of pharmacogenetics nies still question whether there is a coherent be seen, with a steady increase in the number will depend on how competing interests and business, health policy or regulatory model of collaborations until 2001, followed by a options are resolved. emerging to shape the future development of declining rate of growth (FIG. 1).This pattern PGx. Here, on the basis of detailed research indicates that some of the momentum behind Pharmacogenetics (PGx) is concerned with conducted on the social, economic and reg- the technology might have plateaued recently, understanding and, in the clinical setting, ulatory factors shaping PGx during the past partly because of complications in getting it managing the relationship between genetic 2 years (P.M., G.L., A.S. and A.W., False to ‘work’ effectively, and partly as a result of a variation and an individual’s response to med- Positive? The Clinical and Commercial stabilizing of investment3. icinal products. It provides the possibility of Development of Pharmacogenetics,The targeting drugs according to a person’s genetic Wellcome Trust report, also see Online links Options for the development of PGx. There is make-up — so-called ‘personalized medicine’ box), we aim to provide at least a partial no single or principal model for adopting — although it will probably be used to stratify answer to this question. After reviewing PGx technology. Instead, the development of patient populations into groups determined PGx in the commercial sector, and identify- the field can be understood in terms of a by their genotype1.Stratification along these ing the different strategies being pursued, process of experimentation and the search for lines might significantly improve the develop- we discuss its likely clinical role, the regula- viable techniques, with the technology being ment, testing and use of drugs. However, real- tory regime that is emerging, and the wider applied at multiple points in the drug discov- izing these benefits will depend on the policy implications that it raises, especially ery and development process. We have identi- development of viable commercial strategies for advanced health-care systems. fied five broad innovation options for the and clinical delivery in the next few years. It application of PGx (BOX 2). might also require new approaches to regu- The development of PGx technology The first of these is aimed at improving the lation, drug approval and PHARMACOVIGILANCE at Who is developing PGx? There are two discovery of new drugs. Options 2 and 3 are national and international levels. broad groups involved in the commercial mostly concerned with using PGx to improve Given its potential, PGx has gained con- development of PGx. Firstly, about 30 small the safety and efficacy of prospective drugs siderable interest in the pharmaceutical biotechnology and genomics firms are through the re-design of clinical trials. Finally, industry and among clinical researchers — involved in conducting PGx association PGx is also being used to improve the safety such as in the US-based National Institutes of studies, developing specific genetic tests, and efficacy of medicines that have already NATURE REVIEWS | GENETICS VOLUME 5 | SEPTEMBER 2004 | 663 © 2004 Nature Publishing Group PERSPECTIVES Table 1 | Biotechnology and genomics companies developing pharmacogenetics individuals’ genetic profiles as part of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- Company Founded Location Focus imposed post-marketing commitments. This Acadia Pharmaceuticals 1997 US Pharmacogenomic drug discovery in psychiatry PGx-based research involves the prospective collection and analysis of samples from addi- Affymetrix 1992 US Gene chips for pharmacogenetic applications tional trials. The aim of this research is to identify SNPs or haplotypes that can predict Axis-Shield 1982. UK Clinical diagnostics adverse events in patients and to determine Celera Diagnostics 2000 US Clinical PGx diagnostics the genotype of polymorphic cytochrome Curagen 1996 US PGx association and toxicogenomic protein 450 (CYP450) enzymes that are studies responsible for the drug’s metabolism (REF.7, DeCODE (Encode) 1996 (1999) Iceland Clinical PGx diagnostics and Roses, A., unpublished data). (pharmacogenomics CRO) Specialist diagnostics firms and health- DiaDexus 1997 US Clinical PGx diagnostics care providers show the greatest interest in the DNAPrint Genomics 2000 US Clinical PGx diagnostics pre-prescription genotyping of patients, to DxS 2001 UK PGx genetic analysis services improve the safety and efficacy of established Epidauros 1997 Germany PGx assays and services products and the development of drug-test Epigenomics 1998 Germany Clinical PGx diagnostics combinations. Both aims offer the prospect of new diagnostics markets and reduced health- Exon Hit Therapeutics 1997 France Clinical PGx diagnostics care costs. Although this might point to a First Genetic Trust 2000 US Genetic banking services clear business model, the situation is more Gaifar 1997 Germany Clinical PGx diagnostics (viral complicated in relation to the development of genotyping) new products, as larger firms will inevitably be GAG Biosciences 2000 Germany PGx genotyping services involved. New drugs that are developed using Genaissance 1997 US PGx services and diagnostics stratified clinical trials on the basis of PGx tests Gene Logic 1994 US Toxicogenomic serivces will often require a dedicated drug-test combi- Genelex 1987 US Direct to consumer PGx testing nation to be licensed. In such cases, it is in the Genomics Health 2000 US PGx patient testing services interests of pharmaceutical companies to undertake drug-test development, either Genset (Serono) 1989 France Association studies of drug (Switzerland) response themselves or through collaboration with specialist
Recommended publications
  • Comment Letter
    July 23, 2008 Subject: Follow-up on July 22 Meeting Dr. Sirri et al.: I thank you for meeting with Ken Salomon, John Welborn and me yesterday afternoon to discuss Reg SHO, naked short selling and the SEC's recent emergency order. As a follow-up, I want to emphasize the following points: 1. OSTK continues to believe that it is critical that the SEC extend the pre-borrow requirement of the emergency order to the entire market, not just the 19 select companies. OSTK requests that the SEC promptly undertake swift rulemaking so that this protection applies fairly across the market. 2. OSTK continues to support the prompt and full elimination of the option market maker exception, an exception that swallows up the good intentions of Reg SHO. During yesterday's meeting, we discussed the relationship between the markets for equities and their corresponding derivatives (including listed options). You stated that options market makers enjoy an exception from the Reg SHO requirement that they locate and/or deliver shares when hedging against options positions. I am not sure that I would read Reg SHO to say that. However, under your theory, if an options market maker sells a put with a 6- month expiration, then that same market maker has the legal right to naked short and fail to deliver an equivalent amount of the underlying equity (leaving the option market maker "delta neutral”) for six months. This exception is unnecessary and open to abuse/manipulation, particularly with the married puts that often occur in Reg SHO threshold securities.
    [Show full text]
  • [ Emc-Lusinnufll'lergcrta'rgets
    US 20070255633Al (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. N0.: US 2007/0255633 A1 Kridel (43) Pub. Date: NOV. 1, 2007 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INVESTING (52) US. Cl. ....................................................... .. 705/35 (76) Inventor: FIVJigiam J. Kridel, New York, NY (57) ABSTRACT The present invention discloses systems and methods for Correspondence Address? creating and managing ?nancial instruments and indexes PAUL’ HASTINGS’ JANOFSKY & WALKER comprised of securities for companies in subsectors of the LLP economy. These ?nancial instruments alloW investment in R0' BOX 919092 subsectors of the economy Will still being able to minimize SAN DIEGO CA 92191-9092 ’ risk by diversi?cation. The indexes serve as benchmarks for (21) App1_ NO; 11/465,768 companies in the subsectors of the economy. A procedure may be used to identify the securities to include in the (22) Filed: Allg- 18, 2006 ?nancial instruments. This procedure may include (a) iden _ _ tifying securities for companies in a sector of the economy; Related U's‘ Apphcatlon Data (b) limiting the identi?ed securities to those for companies (60) Provisional application No. 60/778,492, ?led on Mar. in a SubSeCIOr Of the SBCIOI‘ Of the economy; (0) applying 1, 2006. focus rules to further limit the identi?ed securities to those _ _ _ _ for companies Who are focused in the subsector of the Pubhcatlon Classl?catlon economy; and (d) limiting the securities included in the (51) Int, Cl, ?nancial instrument or index to those that satisfy other G06Q 40/00 (2006.01) objective criteria. ETF RULE. SET->| APPLICATION’ ' "1 _.
    [Show full text]
  • IPR Biotech April 2009
    WISTA APRIL 2009 From the Desk of Chairman IPR Biotechnology : Part 8 - 56 RNA splicing is the process in which introns, or intervening sequences within a gene, are removed from RNA prior to translation of RNA into protein. RNA splicing takes place in the nucleus of a cell where DNA transcription occurs. There are many types of splicing mechanisms, one of them involves the splicesome, an array of proteins that function to splice out introns. The proteins serve to initiate, stabilize, and break the RNA-RNA interactions forming during the process. The splicing pattern determines the delivery of genetic information and the nature of the final protein product. The information could be used to predict the genetic mutations potentially responsible for causing disease. The Special Feature in the current issue of WISTA:IPR Biotechnology deals with RNA splicing, its mechanism and clinical significance. It also briefly describes some of the recent patents on RNA splicing and related aspects in the field. 'On to Excellence' profiles Acrongenomics Inc, Geneva, a publicly traded research and development nanotechnology company, pioneering the development of uniquely advanced nano-molecular diagnostics for life sciences. It offers innovative and realistic concepts capable of creating viable, low cost and portable point-of-care diagnostic devices for medical testing. Arsenic is a highly toxic element and may pose health risk to humans. However, some microorganisms can tolerate relatively high concentrations of the metalloid. Researchers have found an algae that detoxifies arsenic, thus potentially discovering a possible way for cleaning up underground water, particularly in such affected areas as parts of West Bengal and Bangladesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum To
    MEMORANDUM TO: File No. S7-20-08; Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58190 FROM: Division of Trading and Markets DATE: July 31, 2008 RE: Meeting on Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-58166 On July 22, 2008, staff of the Division of Trading and Markets met with representatives from Overstock.com, Inc. to discuss Regulation SHO, “naked” short selling, and the Commission’s recent Emergency Order, (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34- 58166). Overstock followed-up this meeting by sending an e-mail attaching a letter which is included as an attachment to this Memorandum. July 23, 2008 Subject: Follow-up on July 22 Meeting Dr. Sirri et al.: I thank you for meeting with Ken Salomon, John Welborn and me yesterday afternoon to discuss Reg SHO, naked short selling and the SEC's recent emergency order. As a follow-up, I want to emphasize the following points: 1. OSTK continues to believe that it is critical that the SEC extend the pre-borrow requirement of the emergency order to the entire market, not just the 19 select companies. OSTK requests that the SEC promptly undertake swift rulemaking so that this protection applies fairly across the market. 2. OSTK continues to support the prompt and full elimination of the option market maker exception, an exception that swallows up the good intentions of Reg SHO. During yesterday's meeting, we discussed the relationship between the markets for equities and their corresponding derivatives (including listed options). You stated that options market makers enjoy an exception from the Reg SHO requirement that they locate and/or deliver shares when hedging against options positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors Meeting
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING December 15, 2016 CSIS Building WASHINGTON, D.C. PERSONALIZED MEDICINE COALITION BOARD MEETING December 15, 2016 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. CSIS Building Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Turret Room Agenda Chairman’s Report 1. Approval of May 25, 2016 Minutes 2. Nominations Committee President’s Report 3. 2016 Progress Report 4. Plans for 2017 5. Finance and Budget 6. Membership 7. Public Policy 8. Science Policy 9. Communications New Business December 2016 Board Meeting Table of Contents Agenda 1. Minutes – May 25, 2016 2. Nominations • Current Board Members • Board Composition by Category • Board of Directors Duties • Bylaws 3. Progress Report • 2016 Progress Report • Conference Program (back pocket) 4. Plans for 2017 • Strategic Plan for 2017 • Clinical and Economic Value of Next-Generation Sequencing • The Personalized Medicine Education Initiative • International Comparative Landscape Analysis • Evidence for Coverage and Payment of Personalized Medicine Diagnostics • Personalized Medicine in Value Assessment Frameworks • Turning the Tide Against Cancer 2017 Conference Prospectus • CRD Proposal: Public Policy • Jen Leib Biography • PMC Vice President, Public Policy: Job Description • Kayla Smith Resume 5. Finance and Budget • 2017 Budget • Historical Budget • 2016 Sponsorships • Friends of PMC • Cash and Investments • Chart: Revenues & Expenses • Chart: Membership & Financial Performance • Chart: Cumulative Net Assets • Investment Detail 6. Membership Status • Chart: PMC Membership Numbers • Dues Schedule for Members and Sponsors • Organizations that have withdrawn from PMC since 2007 • Chart: Analysis of 2015 and 2016 Membership Non-Renewal by Reason • 2016 and 2017 New Members • Target List for 2017 Membership • List of PMC Members • Chart: PMC Membership Numbers by Category • 2016 Sponsorships 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commercial & Clinical Development of Pharmacogenetics
    TheFalse commercial Positive? & clinical development of pharmacogenetics Paul Martin, Graham Lewis, Andrew Smart & Andrew Webster False positive? The clinical and commercial development of pharmacogenetics Paul Martin IGBiS, University of Nottingham Graham Lewis SATSU, University of York Andy Smart Bath Spa University Andrew Webster SATSU, University of York Acknowledgements This research was supported by a Wellcome Trust Biomedical Ethics programme project award (Ref No: 018381) on The Clinical and Commercial Development of Pharmacogenetics held by Paul Martin (Principal Investigator), Alison Pilnick and Andrew Webster. The original research was carried out between 2001-03, but data in this report has been updated with data collected as part of the authors’ involvement in the following projects: 1) A study Realising the Potential of Genomic Medicine undertaken by Paul Martin and Michael Morrison funded by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society; 2) A recent ESRC Science in Society Programme project undertaken by Graham Lewis (Pharmacogenomics, diagnostic tests and clinician acceptance, Award No. RES-151-25-0049) for which he is Principal Investigator; 3) A European Commission funded report: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) (2005) Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: state-of-the-art and potential socio-economic impacts in the EU. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Seville, Spain. In particular, some of the data in chapters 2 and 3 were collected as part of this work by Paul Martin and Graham Lewis. The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the following people who have helped in the management and execution of the project: Dr Alison Pilnick who was involved in establishing the project and advising on the drug case studies; Katie Coveny and Michael Morrison who helped update the industry analysis; and Martyn Pickersgill who drafted the executive summary.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Scholarly Guide to the HGP
    The Human Genome Project: An Annotated & Interactive Scholarly Guide to the Project in the United States Editor: Kevin Davies Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Library & Archives The Human Genome Project: An Annotated & Interactive Scholarly Guide to the Project in the United States Editor Kevin Davies Project Leaders Ludmila Pollock Judy Wieber Production Manager Thomas Adams Contributors Brian Dick Robert Wargas Michael Eisenstein Victor McElheny Stephanie Satalino Reviewers Jan Witkowski Rick Myers Robert Cook-Deegan Acknowledgment This project was supported by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Grants for Scholarly Works in Biomedicine and Health (G13). Project Title: Human Genome Project Documentary History: An Annotated Scholarly Guide to the HGP. PI: Ludmila Pollock Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number G13LM011890-01. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Copyright © 2016 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. All rights reserved. Researched, compiled and published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Library & Archives. All World Wide Web addresses are accurate to the best of our knowledge at the time of the printing. ISBN 978-0-9978662-0-9 Extracted: 2016-11-22 INTRODUCTION - 2 The Human Genome Project: An Annotated & Interactive Scholarly Guide to the Project in the United States 1 INTRODUCTION It is my great pleasure to introduce The Human Genome Project: An Annotated & Scholarly Guide to the Project in the United States. The idea for this annotated scholarly guide to the Human Genome Project (HGP) originated at an international meeting on the history of the HGP that was held in May of 2012 at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory’s Banbury Center.
    [Show full text]
  • File Name: Williamsjensen021706.Pdf
    WILLIAMS & JENSEN, PLLC TELEPHONE SUITE 300 FACSIMILE (202) 659-8201 1155 21ST STREET,N.W. (202) 659-5249 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036-3308 February 17,2006 Ms. Nancy M. Morris Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549-9303 Re: Definition of Eligible Portfolio Company under the Investment Company Act of 1940; File No. S7-37-04 Dear Ms. Morris: This submission provides updated and additional data to support the Commission's efforts to modernize the definition of "eligible portfolio company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940. We continue to hear from business development companies (BDCs) regarding the absence of a meaningful and relevant standard for the definition of "eligible portfolio company." We hope that the Commission will examine the attached data and adopt a rule that modernizes the definition in a meaningful fashion, or alternatively urges Congress to remedy the problem through corrective legislation. An effective definition must provide sufficient access for the smaller- and middle-tier public companies that otherwise have little or no access to the public capital markets and also investment opportunities fox-the benefit of BDC shareholders. In 2004, Congress began to address the need to modernize the definition of "eligible portfolio company." The BDC industry pursued a legislative solution because the staff of the Division of Investment Management had indicated in earlier discussions with representatives of the BDC industry that a legislative remedy was the best course of action. The Investment Company Act defines "eligible portfolio company" to include those public companies that do not have outstanding securities upon which margin credit can be granted consistent with the Federal Reserve Board's margin rules.
    [Show full text]