34976 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE results of this review by 60 days, in Shennong Foodstuff Co., Ltd. (Weifang accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of Shennong). The Department also finds International Trade Administration the Act. Because September 11, 2010, that eleven companies subject to this 1 A–549–822 falls on a Saturday, the new deadline for review, including mandatory the final results will be September 13, respondents Shanghai Ever Rich Trade Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 2010. Company (Shanghai Ever Rich), Jining from Thailand: Notice of Extension of We are issuing and publishing this Trans-High, Qingdao Saturn, and Time Limit for the Final Results of the notice in accordance with sections Shenzhen Fanhui did not demonstrate 2008–2009 Administrative Review 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. their eligibility for separate rate status. Dated: June 15, 2010. See Appendix 2. In addition, the AGENCY: Import Administration, John M. Andersen, Department grants a separate rate to the International Trade Administration, four fully-cooperative non-selected Department of Commerce. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty respondents which demonstrated their FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Operations. eligibility for separate rate status. For Johnson at (202) 482–4929, or David [FR Doc. 2010–14958 Filed 6–18–10; 8:45 am] the rates assigned to each of these Goldberger at (202) 482–4136, AD/CVD BILLING CODE S companies, see the ‘‘Final Results of Operations, Office 2, Import Review’’ section of this notice. Finally, Administration, International Trade the Department is also rescinding the Administration, U.S. Department of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE review with respect to one exporter who Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution timely submitted a ‘‘no shipment’’ Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230. International Trade Administration certification. See ‘‘Final Partial Background [A–570–831] Rescission of Administrative Review’’ section of this notice. On March 15, 2010, the Department of Fresh Garlic from the People’s Commerce (the Department) published DATES: Effective Date: June 21, 2010. Republic of China: Final Results and the preliminary results of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Partial Rescission of the 14th administrative review of the Scott Lindsay, AD/CVD Operations, Antidumping Duty Administrative antidumping duty order on certain Office 6, Import Administration, Review frozen warmwater shrimp from International Trade Administration, Thailand covering the period February AGENCY: Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 1, 2008, through January 31, 2009. See International Trade Administration, Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Department of Commerce. Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) Thailand: Preliminary Results of SUMMARY: On December 8, 2009, the 482–0780. Antidumping Duty Administrative Department of Commerce (Department) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Review and Final Results of Partial published in the Federal Register its Rescission of Antidumping Duty preliminary results of administrative Background Administrative Review, 75 FR 12188 review of the antidumping duty order On December 8, 2009, the Department (March 15, 2010). The final results for on fresh garlic from the People’s published in the Federal Register the this administrative review are currently Republic of China (PRC) covering the preliminary results of the 14th AR of the due no later than July 13, 2010, 120 period of review (POR) of November 1, antidumping duty order on fresh garlic days from the date of publication of the 2007, through October 31, 2008. See from the PRC. See Preliminary Results. preliminary results of review. Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic Since the Preliminary Results, the of China: Preliminary Results of, and following events have occurred. Extension of Time Limit for the Final Intent to Rescind, in Part, the On January 5, 2010, the Department Results Antidumping Duty Administrative notified parties that case briefs were due Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act Review, 74 FR 64677 (December 8, 2009) January 11, 2010. On January 14, 2010, of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires (Preliminary Results). Following the the Department extended the deadlines the Department to issue the final results Preliminary Results, we provided for rebuttal briefs to January 25, 2010. of an administrative review within 120 interested parties with an opportunity to On January 11, 2010, Shenzhen days after the date on which the comment on the Preliminary Results. Greening Trading Company Ltd. preliminary results are published. If it is Our analysis of the comments submitted (Greening) and Jinan Yipin Corporation not practicable to complete the review and information received did not lead to Ltd. (Jinan Yipin) submitted their within that time period, section any changes in the Preliminary Results. respective case briefs. Also on January 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Therefore, the final results do not differ 11, 2010, Qingdao Xintianfeng Foods Department to extend the deadline for from the Preliminary Results. Co., Ltd. (Qingdao Xintianfeng) and the final results to a maximum of 180 As discussed below, the Department Weifang Hongqiao International Logistic days after the date on which the is applying total adverse facts available Co., Ltd. (Weifang Hongqiao) and the preliminary results are published. (AFA) to the six mandatory respondents following interested parties: Anqiu The Department requires additional who each failed to cooperate to the best Friend Food Co., Ltd., Anqiu Haoshun time to complete this review in order to of its ability in this proceeding. These Trade Co., Ltd., Jinxiang Dongyun properly consider the numerous and mandatory respondents are Anqiu Freezing Storage Co., Ltd., Juye complex issues raised by interested Friend Food Co., Ltd. (Anqiu Friend), Homestead Fruits and Vegetables Co., parties in their case briefs (e.g., cooked Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd. Ltd., Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., form model matching product (Jining Trans-High), Qingdao Saturn Ltd., Qufu Dongbao Import & Export characteristic and CEP offset). Thus, it is International Trade Co., Ltd. (Qingdao Trade Co., Ltd., Shandong Chenhe not practicable to complete this review Saturn), Shenzhen Fanhui Import & International Trading Co., Ltd., within the original time limit. Export Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen Fanhui), Therefore, the Department is extending Jinxiang Tianma Freezing Storage Co., 1 A full list of companies subject to this review the time limit for completion of the final Ltd. (Tianma Freezing), and Weifang is provided in Appendix 3.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:46 Jun 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Notices 34977

Shandong Longtai Fruits and Vegetables been mechanically harvested and that is (Jining Yongjia). In accordance with the Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Fanhui Import and primarily, but not exclusively, destined instructions in the Initiation Notice, Export Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Sunny for non-fresh use; or (b) garlic that has Jining Yongjia timely certified that it Import & Export Co., Ltd. and Weifang been specially prepared and cultivated had no shipments of subject Shennong Foodstuff Co., Ltd. prior to planting and then harvested and merchandise to the United States during (collectively as ‘‘Interested Parties’’), otherwise prepared for use as seed. The the POR. See Preliminary Results, 74 FR submitted their case brief.2 On January subject merchandise is used principally at 64679; see also Initiation of 25, 2010, the Fresh Garlic Producers as a food product and for seasoning. The Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Association (FGPA) and its individual subject garlic is currently classifiable Administrative Reviews and Requests members (Christopher Ranch LLC, the under subheadings 0703.20.0010, for Revocation in Part, 73 FR 79055 Garlic Company, Valley Garlic, and 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, (Dec. 24, 2008) (Initiation Notice). We Vessey and Company, Inc.) (collectively, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, confirmed Jining Yongjia’s claim by Petitioners) filed their rebuttal brief. On 0711.90.6000, and 2005.90.9700 of the issuing a no-shipment inquiry to CBP February 25, 2010, the Department held Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the and examining electronic CBP data. Our a public hearing. United States (HTSUS). examination of shipment data from CBP On March 19, 2010, Department Although the HTSUS subheadings are for Jining Yongjia indicated that there officials met with Jinan Yipin’s counsel provided for convenience and customs were no entries of subject merchandise to discuss issues related to the briefs. purposes, our written description of the which they exported during the POR. Id. See Memorandum for the File from scope of this order is dispositive. In We received no response from CBP Scott Lindsay, Case Analyst, AD/CVD order to be excluded from the Order, regarding our no-shipment inquiry, Operations, Office 6, Meeting with garlic entered under the HTSUS which corroborates Jining Yongjia’s no- Counsel for Jinan Yipin Corporation subheadings listed above that is (1) shipment certification. No other parties Ltd.: Fresh Garlic from the People’s mechanically harvested and primarily, commented on our preliminary intent to Republic of China (March 19, 2010). but not exclusively, destined for non- rescind. Thus, there is no information or On April 8, 2010, the Department fresh use or (2) specially prepared and argument on the record of the current extended the time limit for completion cultivated prior to planting and then review that warrants reconsidering our of the final results of this administrative harvested and otherwise prepared for preliminary decision to rescind. review by 30 days. See Fresh Garlic use as seed must be accompanied by Therefore, we are rescinding this from the People’s Republic of China: declarations to CBP to that effect. administrative review with respect to Extension of Time Limits for Final Analysis of Comments Received Jining Yongjia. Results of the Antidumping Duty Issues raised in the case and rebuttal Separate Rates Administrative Review, 75 FR 19364 briefs by parties to this proceeding and In the Initiation Notice, the (April 14, 2010). On May 11, 2010, the to which we have responded are listed Department instructed all named firms Department extended the time limit for in Appendix 1 to this notice and that wished to qualify for separate rate completion of the final results of this addressed in the Memorandum To: status in the instant administrative administrative review by an additional Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant review to complete, as appropriate, 30 days. See Fresh Garlic from the Secretary for Import Administration, either a separate-rate certification or a People’s Republic of China: Extension of From: John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy separate-rate application, due no later Time Limits for Final Results of the Assistant Secretary for Antidumping than 30 or 60 calendar days, Antidumping Duty Administrative and Countervailing Duty Operations, respectively, after publication of the Review, 75 FR 29314 (May 25, 2010). Subject: Fresh Garlic from the People’s Initiation Notice. See Initiation Notice, Scope of the Order Republic of China: Issues and Decision 73 FR at 79056. As noted in the Memorandum for the Final Results of Preliminary Results, Anqiu Friend, The products covered by this order the Fourteenth Antidumping Duty Henan Weite Industrial Co. Ltd. (Henan are all grades of garlic, whole or Administrative Review, dated June 14, Weite), Qingdao Xintianfeng, Shanghai separated into constituent cloves, 2010 (Issues and Decision LJ, Tianma Freezing, Weifang Hongqiao, whether or not peeled, fresh, chilled, Memorandum), which is hereby and Weifang Shennong each timely frozen, provisionally preserved, or adopted by this notice. Parties can find submitted separate-rate documentation. packed in water or other neutral a complete discussion of the issues Based on our analyses of this substance, but not prepared or raised in this administrative review and information, the Department preserved by the addition of other the corresponding recommendations in preliminarily found that Henan Weite, ingredients or heat processing. The this public memorandum, which is on Shanghai LJ, Anqiu Friend, Jinxiang differences between grades are based on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Tianma, Qingdao Xintianfeng, Weifang color, size, sheathing, and level of Room 1117 of the main Department Hongqiao, and Weifang Shennong each decay. The scope of this order does not building. In addition, a copy of the has established, prima facie, that it include the following: (a) Garlic that has Issues and Decision Memorandum can qualified for separate rates under the criteria established by Silicon Carbide 2 On October 21, 2009, the Department rescinded be accessed directly on our Web site at the administrative review of forty-three companies. http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and Sparklers. There is no information See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of and electronic version of the Issues and on the record to warrant reconsideration China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Decision Memorandum are identical in of these findings. As such, the Administrative Review, 74 FR 54029 (Oct. 21, 2009). content. Department has found that each of these The Department’s rescission included the rescission seven companies has demonstrated that of Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. (Xinboda) Final Partial Rescission of which Interested Parties commented upon in a it qualifies for separate rates status. letter to the Department on November 18, 2009. The Administrative Review The per-unit separate rate to be Interested Parties further commented upon the In the Preliminary Results, the applied to Henan Weite, Qingdao Department’s rescission of Xinboda in their case brief. For a complete discussion of this issue, see Department announced its intent to Xintianfeng, Shanghai LJ, and Weifang Comment 5 of the Issues and Decision rescind the administrative review with Hongqiao is discussed in the ‘‘Selection Memorandum. respect to Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd. of Rate Applicable to Fully Cooperative

VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:46 Jun 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES 34978 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Notices

Non-Selected Respondents That Qualify The Department received a case brief the Department and not selectively for a Separate Rate’’ section, below. The from Qingdao Xintianfeng and Weifang choose which requests to respond to or per-unit separate rate to be applied to Hongqiao and a rebuttal brief from which information to submit. See Anqiu Friend, Tianma Freezing, and Petitioners addressing issues related to Preliminary Results. Weifang Shennong is discussed in the what per-unit separate rate to apply to In the Preliminary Results, the ‘‘Application of Facts Available’’ section, four non-selected cooperating Department determined that an below.3 As discussed in the Preliminary respondents. These comments are inference that is adverse to the interests Results, the Department found that discussed fully in the Issues and of Anqiu Friend, Tianma Freezing, and because Shanghai Ever Rich, Jining Decision Memorandum. We have not Weifang Shennong was warranted. No Trans-High, Qingdao Saturn, and changed the per-unit separate rate to be new information has been placed on the Shenzhen Fanhui, mandatory applied to the four non-selected record which warrants reconsideration respondents, and seven other companies cooperating respondents. When dealing of this determination. Therefore, for subject to the review did not file timely with the situation where there are no these final results, as AFA the separate rate certifications or calculated rates in the administrative Department is assigning Anqiu Friend, applications, they were part of the PRC- review to apply to the separate rate Tianma Freezing, and Weifang wide entity. There is no information on companies, the Department has Shennong the per kilogram rate of $4.71 the record of this review that warrants determined that a reasonable method is calculated in the 06/07 Administrative reconsideration of these findings. As to assign to non-reviewed companies Review. See Per Unit Memorandum. such, the Department has found that the most recent rate individually As noted in the Preliminary Results, these eleven companies are part of the calculated for such non-selected Qingdao Saturn, Jining Trans-High, and PRC-wide entity. See Appendix 2. companies, unless we calculated in a Shenzhen Fanhui did not timely file more recent segment a rate for any separate rate documentation prior to Selection of Rate Applicable to Fully company that was not zero, de minimis, their selection as mandatory Cooperative Non-Selected Respondents or based entirely on FA, in which case respondents. Jining Trans-High and That Qualify for a Separate Rate we would assign the more recent rate, Shenzhen Fanhui did not respond to In the Preliminary Results, the or average of such more recent rates, as our questionnaire and Qingdao Saturn Department assigned the separate rate the case may be. See Certain Frozen provided incomplete and unverifiable per-unit margin calculated in 06/07 Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist sales, cost, and factors of production Administrative Review (i.e., the separate Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and data. The Department preliminarily rate calculated in the most recently Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping found that there was no basis upon completed administrative review of Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR which to find that any of these three fresh garlic from the PRC) to the four 47191 (September 15, 2009). Further, companies were eligible for separate cooperative separate rate respondents the Department has found this same rate status, and thus they were part of not selected for individual examination methodology to be ‘‘reasonable because the PRC-wide entity. Accordingly, the that qualified for a separate rate (i.e. it is reflective of the commercial PRC-wide entity, which includes these Henan Weite, Qingdao Xintianfeng, behavior demonstrated by exporters of three companies, is under review. We Shanghai LJ, and Weifang Hongqiao). the subject merchandise during a recent further found that the PRC-wide entity, See Memorandum from Nicholas period of time.’’ See Certain Frozen of which these companies are a part, Czajkowski, Case Analyst, Office 6, Re: Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist failed to cooperate by not acting to the Final Results of the Administrative Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and best of its ability. No information on the record of this Review of Fresh Garlic from the Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping review warrants reconsideration of these People’s Republic of China: Separate Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR findings. Therefore, for these final Rate Companies and PRC-Wide Entity— 52273 (September 9, 2008) and the results, the Department has determined Per-Unit Assessment Rates (June 8, accompanying Issues and Decisions that the PRC-wide entity did not 2009) (Per Unit Memorandum) placed Memorandum at Comment 6. Therefore, participate fully in this proceeding, and on the record of this review concurrent for these final results, we continue to that in selecting from among the facts with these preliminary results. apply the separate rate per-unit margin calculated in 06/07 Administrative otherwise available, an adverse Review to the four non-selected fully inference is warranted for the PRC-wide 3 In the instant case, Anqiu Friend, Tianma Freezing, and Weifang Shennong each timely cooperative respondents. entity, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act. For these final results, as AFA, the submitted certain information related to their Application of Adverse Facts Available separate rate status. However, the Department Department is assigning the PRC-wide selected each company as a mandatory respondent. Subsequent to their submission of entity the per kilogram rate of $4.71 As mandatory respondents, each company failed to separate rate documentation, the cooperate to the best of its ability in the review as calculated in the 06/07 Administrative a whole either because it did not submit its sales Department selected Anqiu Friend, Review. See Per Unit Memorandum. and factors of production information, or because Tianma Freezing, and Weifang it submitted incomplete and unverifiable sales and Shennong as mandatory respondents. In Corroboration of Secondary factors of production data. However, because the the Preliminary Results, the Department Information Used as Adverse Facts Department did not notify Anqiu Friend, Tianma Available Freezing, and Weifang Shennong in advance of found that each of these companies submission of the separate rate information that a failed to cooperate to the best of its Section 776(c) of the Act provides respondent would not qualify for separate rate ability in the review as a whole. Tianma that, where the Department selects from status if it failed to cooperate to the best of its Freezing did not respond to our among the facts otherwise available and ability throughout the investigation and/or review, ‘‘ ’’ Anqiu Friend, Tianma Freezing, and Weifang questionnaire and Anqiu Friend and relies on secondary information, the Shennong will keep their separate rate status. See Weifang Shennong each provided Department shall, to the extent e.g., Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty incomplete and unverifiable sales, cost, practicable, corroborate that information Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews: and factors of production data. The from independent sources reasonably at Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 46957 (August 22, 2007) Department also stated that mandatory the Department’s disposal. Secondary and accompanying Issues and Decision respondents must respond to all the information is described in the SAA as Memorandum at Comment 43. information that has been requested by ‘‘information derived from the petition

VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:46 Jun 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Notices 34979

that gave rise to the investigation or Department will disregard the margin Disclosure review, the final determination covering and determine an appropriate margin. We will disclose any memorandums the subject merchandise, or any See, e.g., Fresh Cut Flowers From used in our analysis to parties to these previous review under section 751 Mexico; Final Results of Antidumping proceedings within five days of the date ’’ concerning the subject merchandise. Duty Administrative Review, 61 FR of publication of this notice. See 19 CFR See Statement of Administrative Action 6812, 6814 (February 22, 1996). 351.224(b). accompanying the Uruguay Round Similarly, the Department does not Agreements Act, H.R. Doc. No. 103–316, apply a margin that has been Assessment Rates vol. 1 (1994) (SAA) at 870. The SAA discredited. See D&L Supply Co. v. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the states that ‘‘corroborate’’ means to United States, 113 F.3d 1220, 1221 (Fed. Department will determine, and CBP determine that the information used has Cir. 1997) (the Department will not use shall assess, antidumping duties on all probative value. Id. The Department has a margin that has been judicially appropriate entries. For assessment determined that to have probative value, invalidated). None of these unusual purposes, where possible, the information must be reliable and circumstances are present with respect Department normally calculates relevant. See, e.g., Tapered Roller to the rate being used here. Moreover, importer-specific assessment rates for Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished the rate selected, i.e. $4.71 per kilogram, fresh garlic from the PRC. However, as and Unfinished, From Japan, and is the rate currently applicable to the discussed above, we are not calculating Tapered Roller Bearings Four Inches or PRC-wide entity. The Department any company-specific antidumping Less in Outside Diameter, and assumes that if an uncooperative duties in these final results. As such, it Components Thereof, from Japan; respondent could have obtained a lower is not possible to calculate importer- Preliminary Results of Antidumping rate, it would have cooperated. See specific assessment rates in this review. Duty Administrative Reviews and Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. United States, Rather, those companies demonstrating Partial Termination of Administrative 899 F. 2d 1185, 1190–91 (Fed. Cir. eligibility for a separate rate (Henan Reviews, 61 FR 57391, 57392 (November 1990); Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. Weite, Qingdao Xintianfeng, Shanghai 6, 1996) (unchanged in final results). v. United States, 24 CIT 841, 848 (2000) LJ, and Weifang Hongqiao) were The SAA also states that independent (respondents should not benefit from sources used to corroborate such assigned the most recently calculated failure to cooperate). As there is no per-unit separate rate, while Anqiu evidence may include, for example, information on the record of this review published price lists, official import Friend, Tianma Freezing, and Weifang that demonstrates that this rate is not Shennong were assigned a separate rate statistics and customs data, and appropriate to use as AFA in the current information obtained from interested based on total AFA. Other companies review, we determine that this rate has subject to review (discussed in detail parties during the particular relevance. investigation or review. See SAA at 870; above and listed in Appendix 2) are As this AFA rate is both reliable and found to be part of the PRC-wide entity. see also Notice of Preliminary relevant, we determine that it has Determination of Sales at Less Than Consistent with the 06/07 probative value, and is thus in Administrative Review, we will direct Fair Value: High and Ultra-High Voltage accordance with the requirement, under Ceramic Station Post Insulators from CBP to assess a per-unit (i.e., per section 776(c) of the Act, that secondary kilogram) amount on each entry of the Japan, 68 FR 35627, 35629 (June 16, information be corroborated to the 2003) (unchanged in final subject merchandise during the POR. In extent practicable (i.e., that it has the 06/07 Administrative Review, we determination); and Notice of Final probative value). Determination of Sales at Less Than calculated a per-unit assessment rate for Fair Value: Live Swine From Canada, 70 Final Results of Review separate rate companies, which is the FR 12181, 12183 (March 11, 2005). same separate rate applicable in this As a result of our review, we review. See Per Unit Memorandum. To be considered corroborated, determine that the following margins information must be found to be both This same per-unit assessment rate will exist for the period November 1, 2007 be applied to subject merchandise reliable and relevant. Unlike other types through October 31, 2008: of information, such as input costs or exported by Henan Weite, Qingdao Xintianfeng, Shanghai LJ, or Weifang selling expenses, there are no FRESH GARLIC FROM THE PRC 2007– independent sources for calculated Hongqiao. 2008 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW dumping margins. The only sources for Also in the 06/07 Administrative Review, we calculated per-unit calculated margins are administrative Weighted-av- determinations. The per-unit AFA rate erage margin assessment rates for the companies that we are applying for the current review Manufacturer/exporter (dollars per were determined to be part of the PRC- was calculated using the ad valorem kilogram) wide entity. See Per Unit Memorandum. rate from the original investigation of This is the highest per unit rate garlic from the PRC. See Per Unit Henan Weite Industrial Co., calculated in any segment of the Ltd ...... 1.03 proceeding and, as such, will be applied Memorandum. Furthermore, no Qingdao Xintianfeng Foods information has been presented in the Co., Ltd ...... 1.03 in this review to all companies that current review that calls into question Shanghai LJ International received a rate based on AFA, including the reliability of this information. Thus, Trading Co., Ltd ...... 1.03 the PRC-wide entity. (See Appendix 2). the Department finds that the Weifang Hongqiao Inter- The Department intends to issue information is reliable. national Logistic Co., Ltd .. 1.03 appropriate assessment instructions With respect to the relevance aspect Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd .. 4.71 directly to CBP 15 days after publication of corroboration, the Department will Jinxiang Tianma Freezing of the final results of this review. consider information reasonably at its Storage Co., Ltd ...... 4.71 disposal to determine whether a margin Weifang Shennong Foodstuff Cash Deposit Requirements continues to have relevance. Where Co., Ltd ...... 4.71 Consistent with 06/07 Administrative PRC-wide Entity (see Appen- circumstances indicate that the selected dix 2) ...... 4.71 Review, we will establish and collect a margin is not appropriate as AFA, the per-kilogram cash deposit amount

VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:46 Jun 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES 34980 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Notices

which will be equivalent to the Administrative Protective Orders 4. Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd. company-specific dumping margins 5. Jinan Yipin Corporation Ltd. This notice also serves as a reminder 6. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd. published in these final results of this to parties subject to administrative review. Specifically, the following cash (rescinded). protective orders (APO) of their 7. Jinxiang Dongyun Freezing Storage Co., deposit requirements will be effective responsibility concerning the return or Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang Eastward Shipping upon publication of the final results of destruction of proprietary information Import and Export Limited Company). this review for all shipments of the disclosed under APO in accordance 8. Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing Storage Co., subject merchandise entered, or with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues Ltd. withdrawn from warehouse, for to govern business proprietary 9. Jinxiang Tianma Freezing Storage Co., consumption on or after the publication information in this segment of the Ltd. date of the final results, as provided by 10. Qingdao Xintianfeng Foods Co., Ltd. proceeding. Timely written notification 11. Qingdao Saturn International Trade section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) For of the return/destruction of APO Co., Ltd. subject merchandise exported by Henan materials or conversion to judicial 12. Qufu Dongbao Import & Export Trade Weite, Qingdao Xintianfeng, Shanghai protective order is hereby requested. Co., Ltd. LJ, or Weifang Hongqiao, the cash Failure to comply with the regulations 13. Shanghai Ever Rich Trade Company. deposit rate will be the per-unit rate and terms of an APO is a violation 14. Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., determined in the final results of the which is subject to sanction. Ltd. administrative review; (2) for subject This administrative review and notice 15. Shenzhen Fanhui Import & Export Co., merchandise exported by Anqiu Friend, are in accordance with sections Ltd. 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 16. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., Ltd. Tianma Freezing, or Weifang Shennong 17. Taiyan Ziyang Food Co., Ltd. the cash deposit rates will be the per- CFR 351.213. 18. Weifang Hongqiao International unit rate determined in the final results Dated: June 14, 2010. Logistic Co., Ltd. of the administrative review; (3) for Paul Piquado, 19. Weifang Shennong Foodstuff Co., Ltd. subject merchandise exported by PRC Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import [FR Doc. 2010–14959 Filed 6–18–10; 8:45 am] exporters subject to this administrative Administration. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P review that have not been found to be Appendix 1 entitled to a separate rate (see Appendix 2), the cash deposit rate will be the per- Issue 1: Whether the Petitioners’ Request DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE unit PRC-wide rate determined in the for Review of Jinan Yipin was Deficient. final results of administrative review; Issue 2: Whether the Department Should International Trade Administration Rescind its Administrative Review with (4) for subject merchandise exported by Respect to Jinan Yipin and Shenzhen [A–580–809] all other PRC exporters of subject Greening. merchandise that have not been found Issue 3: Whether the Requirement That a Circular Welded Non–Alloy Steel Pipe to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash Party Timely Certify No-Shipments is Unfair from the Republic of Korea: Final deposit rate will be the per-unit PRC- and Arbitrary. Results of the Antidumping Duty wide rate determined in the final results Issue 4: Application of PRC-Wide Rate to Administrative Review of administrative review; (5) for Jinan Yipin and Shenzhen Greening. Issue 5: Rescission of Shenzhen Xinboda. AGENCY: Import Administration, previously-investigated or previously- Issue 6: Determination of Separate Rate. reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. who received a separate rate in a prior Appendix 2 SUMMARY: On December 8, 2009, the segment of the proceeding (and which Companies Under Review Subject to the Department of Commerce (the were not reviewed in this segment of the PRC-Wide Rate ‘‘Department’’) published the proceeding), the cash deposit rate will 1. Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd. preliminary results of the administrative continue to be the rate assigned in that 2. Qingdao Saturn International Trade Co., review of the antidumping duty order segment of the proceeding; (6) the cash Ltd. on circular welded non–alloy steel pipe deposit rate for non-PRC exporters of 3. Shenzhen Fanhui Import & Export Co., (‘‘CWP’’) from the Republic of Korea subject merchandise which have not Ltd. (‘‘Korea’’), covering the period November received their own rate will be the rate 4. Heze Ever-Best International Trade Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Shandong Heze International 1, 2007, through October 31, 2008. See applicable to the PRC exporter that Trade and Developing Company) Circular Welded Non–Alloy Steel Pipe supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 5. Jinan Yipin Corporation Ltd. from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary requirements, when imposed, shall 6. Jinxiang Dongyun Freezing Storage Co., Results and Rescission in Part of the remain in effect until further notice. Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang Eastward Shipping Import and Export Limited Company) Antidumping Duty Administrative Notification to Importers 7. Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing Storage Co., Review, 74 FR 64670 (December 8, 2009) Ltd. (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). This review This notice serves as a final reminder 8. Qufu Dongbao Import & Export Trade covers six producers/exporters of the to importers of their responsibility Co., Ltd. subject merchandise to the United under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 9. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., Ltd. States: SeAH Steel Corporation certificate regarding the reimbursement 10. Shanghai Ever Rich Trade Company (‘‘SeAH’’), Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., Korea of antidumping duties prior to 11. Taiyan Ziyang Food Co., Ltd. Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., Union Steel Co., liquidation of the relevant entries Appendix 3 Ltd., Nexteel Co. Ltd., and A–JU Besteel during this review period. Failure to Companies Subject to the Administrative Co., Ltd. SeAH is the only mandatory comply with this requirement could Review respondent. We gave the interested result in the Secretary’s presumption parties an opportunity to comment on 1. Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd. that reimbursement of antidumping 2. Henan White Industrial Co., Ltd. the Preliminary Results. Based on our duties occurred and the subsequent 3. Heze Ever-Best International Trade Co., analysis of the comments received and assessment of double antidumping Ltd. (f/k/a Shandong Heze International the results of verification, we have made duties. Trade and Developing Company). changes to the margin calculation. The

VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:46 Jun 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES