Saturniidae) Larvae on Various Plant Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saturniidae) Larvae on Various Plant Species 212 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY FEEDING AND SURVIVAL OF CECROPIA (SATURNIIDAE) LARVAE ON VARIOUS PLANT SPECIES A. G. SCARBROUGH Department of Biology, Towson State College, Baltimore, ~1aryland 21204 AND G. P. WALDBAUER AND J. G. STERNBURG Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 During the course of our studies of the cecropia moth, Hyalophora cecropia (L.), we found a large proportion of cocoons in low shrubs. We suspected that many of these shrubs, particularly species of Juniperus and Taxus, do not support larval growth, and that the presence of cocoons on them is evidence that pre-spinning larvae wandered to them from the foodplant. Most of the shrubs in question are not included on published lists of the hostplants of cecropia, but since this does not prove that cecropia larvae could not feed on them, we made the feeding trials described below. There is some doubt as to whether or not all of the species on the published "foodplant lists" of cecropia are actually eaten by cecropia larvae. Brodie's (1882) list is reliable since he included only plants on which larvae had been found feeding in the field. On the other hand, Marsh's (1937) list is of dubious value since he included plants on which he had found cocoons but had not seen larvae. Tietz (1958) compiled a long list, but, unfortunately, did not state the evidence upon which the plants were included. MA TERIALS AND METHODS Most cocoons were collected in residential areas, principally in the twin cities of Champaign and Urbana, Illinois, although a few were found in nearby small towns. A small number came from rural areas, mostly from ditch banks, railroad rights-of-way, roadsides and fence rows. The larvae used in feeding trials were the progeny of wild parents which had been collected as described above. After mating in the laboratory, females were placed in large paper bags where they ovi­ posited. Before hatching occurred, small bits of paper bearing the eggs were snipped out and transferred to petri dishes. The unfed first instars used in the first series of tests were indiscriminately selected within a VOLUME 28, NUMBER 3 213 half-hour of hatching. The partly grown larvae used in the second series were indiscriminately selected from groups of larvae reared in nylon mesh sleeves on apple trees (Malus pumila) essentially as described by Telfer (1967). Plants of 118 species were tested for their ability to support the growth of first ins tar larvae. Each species was tested with at least three replicates. Species on which no larvae survived the first stadium in the initial test were retested with an additional three replicates. Each replicate con­ sisted of ten larvae confined with foliage in a 10 cm petri dish lined with a disc of moist filter paper. The newly hatched larvae were weighed in groups of ten and immediately placed in the dishes. Undamaged foliage, collected daily from plants growing in full sunlight, was sealed in plastic bags and stored in a refrigerator until used later the same day. The dishes were kept under constant illumination and at a temperature of 23 ± 1°C. At least once a day fresh food was added, and dead larvae, left over food, and feces were removed. Feces were dried im­ mediately, and eventually the aggregate for each replicate was redried to a constant weight at 100° C (see Waldbauer, 1964) . This weight was divided by the sum of the number of larvae feeding on each test day to yield the mean dry weight of feces passed per larva per day. Larvae were weighed and considered to have survived the stadium as soon as they had spun a molting pad. Dishes with moist filter paper but no food, and dishes with Acer saccharinum foliage served as negative and positive controls respectively. A group of tests was started on each of three days. Each group had its own controls, but since the controls differed by very little they have been lumped in Table 2. A few plants were also tested with two groups of partly grown larvae. Each group consisted of five larvae confined in a sleeve on a branch of a living plant in the field. They were transferred to the test plant from apple foliage, one group just before the molt to the fifth stadium and the other on the seventh day of the fifth stadium. Apple branches with leaves served as positive controls, and defoliated branches of the test plant as negative controls. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Table 1 lists the plants on which we found 10/0 or more of the cocoons collected during this study. Almost all of the cocoons from rural areas were on Salix interior, a shrubby willow which grows wild on ditch banks and in other moist places, but is not planted in urban areas. A few of the other listed species grow wild in this area, but with few 214 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY TABLE l. The location of cecropia cocoons found during the collecting seasons of 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70. Only those plants on which 10/0 or more of the total was found are named. Species which do not serve as food plants for cecropia are marked with an asterisk. Cocoons Found Locations Number % of total Acer saccharinum L. 1,074 34.8 * Juniperus spp. 278 9.0 Salix interior Rowlee 254 8.2 Betula pendula Roth. 168 5.4 Acer rubrum L. 136 4.4 Rhamnus frangula L. 132t 4.3 Malus spp. (Including pumila) 127 4.1 * Ligustrum vu.lgare L. 115 3.7 *Taxus media Rehd. 102 3.3 Betula populifolia Marsh. 90 2.9 Platanus occidentalis L. 66 2.1 Betula papyrifera Marsh. 52 1.7 Comus stolonifera Michx. and C. alba L. 46t 1.5 *Euonymus spp. (not alatu~) 38 1.2 Other plants 355 1l.5 Fences and buildings 51 1.7 3,084 99.8 t See text. exceptions we found cocoons only on cultivated specimens in urban areas. The data of Table 1 do not reflect the importance to cecropia in this area of Rhamnus frangula and the two species of Comus. In an earlier study (Waldbauer & Sternburg, 1967) we found cocoons abundantly on Comus stolonifera and C. alba. However, during the present study we did little collecting from Comus because most plants of these species in this area were included in another study of cecropia. R. frangula was formerly scarce in this area, but has become a popular hedge plant since we began our studies of cecropia in 1965; the great majority of cocoons from R. frangula were collected during the last year of the present study. Over 120/0 of the cocoons were found on shrubby conifers, Juniperus spp. and Taxus media, but only if these conifers were close to trees, particularly Acer saccharinum and Betula spp., which are important foodplants of cecropia in this area. We hypothesized that the larvae do not feed on these conifers, but migrate to them from their foodplants when they are ready to spin cocoons. The observations recorded below VOLUME 28, NUMBER 3 215 TABLE 2. Survival, growth and feces production of first instar cecropia larvae on the leaves of various woody plants. All plants were tested with three replicates of ten larvae each except those marked with an asterisk, which were tested with six replicates of ten each, and A. saccharinum and moist filter paper which were tested with 9 replicates of ten each. Duration of Mg fresh Mg dry feces/ ins tar (days) weight gained larva/day % Plants Survival Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Plants listed in Table I Acer rubrum L. 96.6 6.0 6.0-6.0 224 217-242 39.5 37.9-41.0 A. saccharinum L. 95.0 6.3 5.0-7.0 202 167-233 33.6 30.0-38.9 Betula papyrifera Marsh. 83.3 3.8 3.5-4.0 329 309-345 39.9 34.1-44.2 B. pendula Roth. 90.0 4.6 4.5-5.0 358 336-395 32.6 24.8-36.8 Comus alba L. 93.3 4.3 4.0-5.0 235 193-263 16.5 12.8-18.7 C. stoloni/era Michx. 96.6 4.6 4.0-5.5 237 216-276 20.3 20.0-22.8 Euonymus alatus Sieb. 90.0 8.8 8.0-9.5 180 166-203 22.7 20.4-24.3 E. fortunei Trucz. * o 0.1 0.1-0.3 E. yedoensis Koeh.* o 2.9 1.2-4.2 Juniperus chinensis L. * 1.6 8.0 80 4.6 2.9-6.8 J. communis L. * o 0.3 0.1-0.6 J. procumbens End!. * o 4.9 2.0-8.9 J. sabina L. * o 0.7 0.5-0.9 J. virginiana L. * o 0.3 0.2-0.3 Ligustmm vulgare L. 3.3 8.0 244 12.9 9.2-15.6 Malus adstringens Zabel. 96.6 5.3 5.0-6.0 279 232-264 30.9 26.5-33.3 M. amoldiana Sarg. 93.3 5.3 5.0-5.5 311 304-320 31.1 28.5-33.2 M. atrosanguinea Scheid. 96.6 5.3 5.0-6.0 252 232-264 30.8 28.0-32.9 M. floribunda Sieb. 83.3 5.0 5.0-5.0 186 145-207 27.4 26.8-28.4 M. pumila Mil!. 93.0 4.5 4.0-5.0 311 305-321 49.2 44.3-56.4 Plantanus occidentalis L.
Recommended publications
  • Hawk Moths of North America Is Richly Illustrated with Larval Images and Contains an Abundance of Life History Information
    08 caterpillars EUSA/pp244-273 3/9/05 6:37 PM Page 244 244 TULIP-TREE MOTH CECROPIA MOTH 245 Callosamia angulifera Hyalophora cecropia RECOGNITION Frosted green with shiny yellow, orange, and blue knobs over top and sides of body. RECOGNITION Much like preceding but paler or Dorsal knobs on T2, T3, and A1 somewhat globular and waxier in color with pale stripe running below set with black spinules. Paired knobs on A2–A7 more spiracles on A1–A10 and black dots on abdomen cylindrical, yellow; knob over A8 unpaired and rounded. lacking contrasting pale rings. Yellow abdominal Larva to 10cm. Caterpillars of larch-feeding Columbia tubercle over A8 short, less than twice as high as broad. Silkmoth (Hyalophora columbia) have yellow-white to Larva to 6cm. Sweetbay Silkmoth (Callosamia securifera) yellow-pink instead of bright yellow knobs over dorsum similar in appearance but a specialist on sweet bay. Its of abdomen and knobs along sides tend to be more white than blue (as in Cecropia) and are yellow abdominal tubercle over A8 is nearly three times as set in black bases (see page 246). long as wide and the red knobs over thorax are cylindrical (see page 246). OCCURRENCE Urban and suburban yards and lots, orchards, fencerows, woodlands, OCCURRENCE Woodlands and forests from Michigan, southern Ontario, and and forests from Canada south to Florida and central Texas. One generation with mature Massachusetts to northern Florida and Mississippi. One principal generation northward; caterpillars from late June through August over most of range. two broods in South with mature caterpillars from early June onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(2), 1985, 65-84
    JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Volume 39 1985 Number 2 Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(2), 1985, 65-84 MAINTAINING SPECIES INTEGRITY BETWEEN SYMPATRIC POPULATIONS OF HYALOPHORA CECROPIA AND HYALOPHORA COLUMBIA (SATURNIIDAE) IN CENTRAL MICHIGAN JAMES P. TUTTLE 728 Coachman #4, Troy, Michigan 48083 ABSTRACT. The available literature suggests that Hyalophora cecropia and Hya­ lophora columbia have identical ethological requirements with respect to reproductive behavior and F j hybrids have often been produced in the laboratory. As a result, investi­ gators have long been puzzled by the rarity of natural hybrids since the two species occur sympatrically over much of the northern Great Lakes region. Field observations in Montcalm County, Michigan, identified a series of progressive barriers which operate to prevent hybridization. The prezygotic isolating mechanisms, seasonal isolation, daily allochronic flight behavior, and mechanical incompatibility re­ strict most of the interaction between the two species. However, when individuals oc­ casionally overcome those barriers and a successful hybrid mating occurs, several post­ zygotic isolating mechanisms are then tested. As a result of the overall effectiveness of these systems, the gene pool of each species is protected, thereby allowing the two species to co-exist. The large moths of the genus Hyalophora (Saturniidae) are repre­ sented by two species within the state of Michigan. The cecropia moth, Hyalophora cecropia (L.), is widely distributed, while Hyalophora co­ lumbia (S. I. Smith) is a much more localized species. When Moore (1955) published his checklist of the Michigan moths, he listed 18 county records for H. cecropia from such varied locales as Dickinson County in the western portion of the Upper Peninsula to metropolitan Wayne County in the southeastern portion of the Lower Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Watching Western Colorado Butterflies
    Watching Western Colorado Butterflies Dr. Warren H. “Herb” Wagner Why? • Enhance the outdoor experience • Intro to butterfly conservation • Fun Three Steps to Conservation Xerxes Society for Invertebrate Conservation 1) Identify the resources The butterflies Their larval host plants The adult food sources floral & other 2) Protect the resources The landscape & nectar, host plants 3) Enhance the resources Larval & adult host plants Gardens What are the threats? Invasive weeds Knapweeds, bindweed, cheatgrasses, spurges, … Large scale hot-burning fire More frequent, smaller fires not a threat People Serious collecting benefits long term conservation efforts A few rare species are threatened by over-collecting Habitat destruction is a real and serious threat to many butterfly populations Collecting Butterflies With proper labeling & care COLO Mesa Co • Indisputable historical records Black Ridge Rd • Essential for proper ID 6 Apr 1996 • Genetic records JA & RW Hammon • Fun! • Pretty Paonia Colo 7/23/1932 If you are going to use a field guide, this is the one Colorado Butterflies 289 Species West slope - > 200 species Gunnison County 159 species Mesa County 155 species • Skippers 36 species • Skippers 36 species • Swallowtails 6 species • Swallowtails 7 species • Lycaenids 40 species • Lycaenids 39 species • Pierids 20 species • Pierids 16 species • Metalmarks 1 species • Metalmarks 1 species • Nymphalids 56 species • Nymphalids 56 species Metamorphosis naturallycuriouswithmaryholland Lepidoptera = Scale wing The proboscis, clubbed antenna
    [Show full text]
  • Hyalophora Leonis Sp. N. from Nuevo León in the Sierra Madre Oriental (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae, Attacini)
    ©Entomologischer Verein Apollo e.V. Frankfurt am Main; download unter www.zobodat.at Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 35 (4): 195–205 (2014) 195 A second new Hyalophora from Mexico: Hyalophora leonis sp. n. from Nuevo León in the Sierra Madre Oriental (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae, Attacini) Stefan Naumann1, Wolfgang A. Nässig2, and Guillermo Nogueira G. Dr. Stefan Naumann, Hochkirchstrasse 11, D­10829 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] Dr. Wolfgang A. Nässig, Entomologie II, Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Senckenberganlage 25, D­60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; wolfgang.naessig@ senckenberg.de Guillermo Nogueira G., c/o Escuela de Biologia, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Av. Patria No. 1201, Lomas del Valle 3ra. Seccion, Zapopan, Jalisco, C.P. 44100, México Abstract: A new species of the genus Hyalophora, H. leonis Una segunda Hyalophora de México, nueva en su sp. n., is described. Male and female specimens from the especie: Hyalophora leonis sp. n. de Nuevo León en Me xican federal stat e of Nuevo León as well as male ge nit a­ la Sierra Madre Oriental (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae, lia are illus trat ed; a distribution map is included. The male Attacini) ho lotype is deposited in Colección Nacional de Insectos, Uni versidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Méxi co, Resumen: Se describe una nueva especie del género Hya lo- Mexico. Both sexes of the new species are known. The new pho ra, H. leonis sp. n. Se ilustra con especímenes machos y species is compared with other Hyalophora species, in clu­ hem bras de la entidad federativa de Nuevo León, México, d ing the recently described H.
    [Show full text]
  • May, 2012 ======Seen on Snow, but Why All at Once and Just That One Day? It Was a Sight I Will Keep in My Mind's Eye for a Long Time to Come
    ============================================================================================= Vol. 16, No. 2 May, 2012 ============================================================================================= seen on snow, but why all at once and just that one day? It was a sight I will keep in my mind's eye for a long time to come. The past three months have definitely been interesting. Warm then hot, then freezing, then normal; dry, then 5” of rain. How are the insects handling all this? Many of them will not even notice. Early season insects are designed to deal with adverse conditions and can tolerate many extremes. Some will Tetragnatha viridis from North Whitefield become un-synchronized with their host plants as the two (photo by Charlene Donahue) respond to different environmental cues and develop at Now on to the future. We have our usual list of field trips different rates. These insects may do poorly or they may do lined up and I hope to see many of you at them. Bring friends better the usual. We will have to wait and see. In general and family too. The trips are a chance to slow down, enjoy insects and plants appear 1 ½ to 2 weeks ahead of normal different parts of the state, learn about insects and spend development. The mosquitoes were out and biting in March – sometime with others interested in insects as well. not a welcome sign of spring. These are species that Continued on next page overwinter as adults and can be found on woodpiles or in your basement all winter long. ☛ In this issue: I was witness to an interesting phenomenon this winter. New wood wasps enter MFS collections (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Decline in the Northeastern United States David L
    _______________________________________________________________________________________News of the Lepidopterists’ Society Volume 54, Number 2 Conservation Matters: Contributions from the Conservation Committee Moth decline in the Northeastern United States David L. Wagner Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268 [email protected] The matter of moth decline in the Northeast and south- ern Canada, particularly of larger moths, has been of con- cern for a half century (Muller 1968-1979, Hessel 1976, Schweitzer 1988, Goldstein 2010). Below I offer an assess- ment, based on my 23 years in New England. Mine is a prospective piece meant to raise the issue of moth decline to a larger audience—it is a call for study, a research agen- da—offered in the absence of the quantitative data needed to make rigorous species-by-species status assessments. As a caveat to what I outline below, I should add that local, regional, and continental biota changes are the norm and that all animal and plant distributions change through time. Ranges and abundances may, in fact, be inherently much more dynamic than is generally understood. At issue here, is not change, but the rate and nature of changes. Hickory horned devil (Citheronia regalis). Members of the genus Lepidoptera and other herbivores are under considerable Citheronia were among the first moths to disappear from New evolutionary pressures from below and above, fated to be England. The last C. regalis record for the region was Syd in never-ending battles with their hostplants (the bottom- Hessels’s 1956 collection from Washington, CT (Ferguson, 1971). up forces) and natural enemies (the top-down forces).
    [Show full text]
  • Caterpillars on the Foliage of Conifers in the Northeastern United States 1 Life Cycles and Food Plants
    INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Coniferous forests are important features of the North American landscape. In the Northeast, balsam fir, spruces, or even pines may dominate in the more northern forests. Southward, conifers still may be prevalent, although the pines become increasingly important. In dry, sandy areas, such as Cape Cod of Massachusetts and the Pine Barrens of New Jersey, hard pines abound in forests composed of relatively small trees. Conifers are classic symbols of survival in harsh environments. Forests of conifers provide not only beautiful scenery, but also livelihood for people. Coniferous trees are a major source of lumber for the building industry. Their wood can be processed to make paper, packing material, wood chips, fence posts, and other products. Certain conifers are cultivated for landscape plants and, of course, Christmas trees. Trees of coniferous forests also supply shelter or food for many species of vertebrates, invertebrates, and even plants. Insects that call these forests home far outnumber other animals and plants. Because coniferous forests tend to be dominated by one to a few species of trees, they are especially susceptible to injury during outbreaks of insects such as the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana, the fall hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria, or the pitch pine looper, Lambdina pellucidaria. Trees that are defoliated by insects suffer reduced growth and sometimes even death. Trees stressed by defoliation, drought, or mechanical injury, are generally more susceptible to attack by wood-boring beetles, diseases, and other organisms. These secondary pests also may kill trees. Stress or tree death can have a negative economic impact upon forest industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2006, Volume 2 – Issue 1
    ALG News - Volume 2: Issue 1 ALG’s Favorite Moths by Doug Macaulay Recently a question arose as to Charley Bird: “ I go along with the images you have shared of what my favorite species of John.” ( Hyalophora c. gloveri ) them. I probably don't even Lepidoptera was. At first I had know of the existence of what Fall 2006 Chris Schmidt: “…maybe not no idea. I never realized how one day I will think is the much thought needs to go into attractive in the conventional most beautiful or otherwise Lepidoptera sense, the wing- a question like this. So I favorite one. But, if I just go Erannis tiliaria started off with a list of ten less Erannis ( ) with moths in my growing females out right now are cer- worthy candidates. Once I 'virtual' collection, I'll vote for finalized this list after hours of tainly plain old weird !” the ' Autographa ' moths as a scrutinizing my favorite in- Gary Anweiler: “ I had to group - and so far Syngrapha sects I decided to base my really think about this one microgamma as the most fa- choice on appearance and how because - as dear old mom vorite of them. But others that intriguing it was. An hour or used to say - they are ALL my have struck me as extraordi- two later I decided my favorite favorites. BUT - I think it is narily pretty include Sicya two were Geina tenuidactyla , the first spring pink form of macularia , Mesothea incer- a wonderful little Pterophorid, the Dogwood Thyatirid, tata , Anania funebris and and the elegant Dysstroma If Polychrysia I'm going to esmeralda .
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of North America
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Habrosyne scripta Lettered Habrosyne Habrosyne gloriosa Glorious Habrosyne Pseudothyatira cymatophoroides Tufted Thyatirid Thyatira mexicana Euthyatira lorata Euthyatira semicircularis Ceranemota improvisa Ceranemota fasciata Ceranemota crumbi Ceranemota semifasciata Ceranemota tearlei Ceranemota partida Ceranemota albertae Ceranemota amplifascia Bycombia verdugoensis Euthyatira pudens Dogwood Thyatirid Drepana arcuata Arched Hooktip Drepana bilineata Two-lined Hooktip Eudeilinia herminiata Northern Eudeilinea Oreta rosea Rose Hooktip Eudeilinia luteifera Southern Eudeilinia Coloradia pandora Pandora pinemoth Coloradia luski Lusk's pinemoth Coloradia doris Doris' pinemoth Coloradia velda Velda pinemoth Automeris io Io moth Automeris louisiana Louisiana eyed silkmoth Automeris randa Randa's eyed silkmoth Automeris iris Iris eyed silkmoth Automeris cecrops Cecrops eyed silkmoth Automeris zephyria Zephyr eyed silkmoth Automeris patagoniensis Patagonia eyed silkmoth Hylesia coinopus Hemileuca juno Juno buckmoth Hemileuca maia Eastern buckmoth Hemileuca nevadensis Nevada buckmoth Hemileuca artemis Hemileuca lucina New England buckmoth Hemileuca slosseri Slosser's buckmoth Hemileuca peigleri Hemileuca grotei Grote's buckmoth Hemileuca stonei Stone's buckmoth Hemileuca electra Electra buckmoth Hemileuca tricolor Tricolor buckmoth Hemileuca hualapai Hualapai buckmoth Hemileuca oliviae Range caterpillar moth Hemileuca burnsi Burns' buckmoth Hemileuca
    [Show full text]
  • Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
    Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services PR&CS Administration 1401 Recreation Way Colorado Springs, CO 80905 Agenda Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Advisory Board Please silence your phone during the meeting. Thursday, November 8, 2018 7:30 am Palmer Room Call to Order Citizen Discussion Time for any individual to bring before the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board any matter of interest they wish to discuss that is not elsewhere on the agenda. Comments are restricted to three (3) minutes; you will hear an alarm when your time is up. Please contact PR&CS staff no later than the last Wednesday of the month prior if you wish to place a longer presentation on the agenda. Approval of Minutes- October 11, 2018 Minutes are posted no later than 5:00pm on the Tuesday before the meeting at: https://coloradosprings.gov/city-council/page/parks-and-recreation-advisory-board Ceremonial items (7:30 a.m. time certain) Medicine Wheel Trail Advocates – Stephanie’s Trail Bridge and Lake David Deitemeyer Moraine Trail Presentations Strawberry Hill Master Plan Update Chris Lieber Corral Bluffs BioBlitz Britt Haley Staff Reports Regional Parks, Trails and Open Space Update Scott Abbott Pikes Peak Summit House Update Jack Glavan Water Conservation and Usage Update Eric Becker Prospect Lake Update Kim King Adjournment Board Business COLORADO SPRINGS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: November 8, 2018 Item Number: Presentation Item # 1 Item Name: Strawberry Hill Master Plan Update BACKGROUND: At its May 2018 meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Advisory Board reviewed and approved a park development master plan submitted by N.E.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths and Butterflies of the Prairies Ecozone in Canada
    169 Chapter 5 Moths and Butterflies of the Prairies Ecozone in Canada Gregory R. Pohl Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6H 3S5 B. Christian Schmidt Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 J. Donald Lafontaine and Jean-François Landry Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 Gary G. Anweiler University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E3 Charles D. Bird P.O. Box 22, Erskine, Alberta, Canada, T0C 1G0 Abstract. The Prairies Ecozone of southern Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta supports a diverse fauna, with 2,232 species of butterflies and moths (order Lepidoptera) recorded to date in 61 families. By far the best known Lepidoptera are the butterflies, with 177 species known to occur in the ecozone. The species known to occur in the Prairies Ecozone are listed by province. The Lepidoptera fauna of this ecozone is reviewed in terms of diversity, state of knowledge of the major groups, postglacial and relict patterns, recent changes in distribution, and endangered and threatened species. Résumé. L’écozone des prairies du sud du Manitoba, de la Saskatchewan et de l’Alberta abrite une faune diversifiée qui compte 2 232 espèces de papillons diurnes et de nuit (Ordre Lepidoptera) répertoriées à ce jour, représentant 61 familles. L’écozone comprend 177 espèces de papillons diurnes, qui sont beaucoup mieux connus que les papillons de nuit.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER of the Michigan Entomological Society Is Published As Four Numbers Yearly, at Irregular Intervals
    O'BR; .'·;!.l .MARK • "If_! i NE WSLETT of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Volume 22 Number 1 & 2 February 25 1977 ASIMPLY CONSTRUCTED REARING CAGE FOR LABORATORY OR FIELD by H. Gordinier, Jr. Like most of my scientific equipment, this string or large rubber band (tight rubber bands item is quick, inexpensive, and unsophisticated will buckle the acetate). There, now you have Nevertheless, the desired result is achieved, a cheap and useful rearing cage. that being the rearing out of insect species in their various stages of metamorphoses. The ma­ terials used are not intended for long-range field use due to their lack of weight and stur­ --..-ubber' bat'ld diness, but adaptability can be further impro­ O~ string vised by the user. As an example of personal use, I required a transparent cage that could be placed over host plants of various species muslin of gall forming cynipids (cynipidae:· Hymenop­ tera) for emergence, behavioral, and life­ history data both in the field and laboratory. ~ scotcht tape The cylindrical acetate cages provided very sat­ isfactory results under both conditions. Care should be taken in the field that strong winds .010"acetate and heavy rain be considered in placement of the cages. The materials needed are: sheet acetate (.010" thick, .005" is too thin), rubber bands or string, transparent tape, and muslin. electrical tape Acetate sheets may be obtained at most Art or av-ou"d bottom Drafting supply stores. To construct, simply ed(le. for roll the acetate into the desired cylinder dia­ t"iSldC.-ty meter 'and tape edges inside and out.
    [Show full text]