Compassionate Use

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Compassionate Use HIGH SCHOOL BIOETHICS PROJECT COMPASSIONATE USE OVERVIEW PROCEDURES AND ACTIVITIES This module encourages students to think This unit uses a student-centered and interactive through ethical and social issues surrounding the approach to teaching. Activities are designed to compassionate use of experimental drugs and de- allow for a maximum degree of student partici- vices. Students will be exposed to the process of pation and collaboration. Each activity is marked testing and licensing new drugs with the US Food as an individual-, partner-, or group activity, or as and Drug Administration in an effort to understand a teacher-directed class discussion. the motivations for compassionate use and the ethical issues it raises. The module relies on a The following icons are used to designate the case-based approach to learning. Three cases are different types of activities: presented, and students will be led in an analysis of the issues presented in the cases. Individual Activity CONTENTS Partner Activity 1. Introduction to Topic 2. Definitions Group Activity 3. Case Study: The Effects of Social Media 4. Case Study: When the Drug Fails 5. Case Study: Unequal Access 6. Conclusion Teacher-Directed Class Discussion 7. References and Additional Resources LEARNING OUTCOMES 1. Learn the basics of compassionate use 2. Understand the motivations and ethical dilem- mas behind the development of compassion- ate use 3. Examine case studies and formulate opinions about the current state of compassionate use 4. Brainstorm possible solutions for the future of compassionate use DC 1/27/2020 1. INTRODUCTION TO TOPIC want access to a new drug. Some people in this position turn to social media outlets to find support from well-connected friends who might be able to help by intervening with ex- ecutives at a company. Sometimes, patients will use social media and news outlets to pub- Suppose you have a disease or illness that can’t licly pressure drug companies into providing be treated. You’re going to get worse. Perhaps the unapproved medication. you’re even dying. There is no drug available in a pharmacy that can help. Maybe your doctor In general, the public is supportive of patients has already prescribed many medications, and who are out of other options, gaining access to nothing has worked. What’s left to do? possible benefits from an investigational drug. However, this method of obtaining unapproved Some patients in this position might learn medication works best for patients who are about a new medication that might help. It’s wealthy, connected, and socially savvy. Pa- still being developed, so your doctor can’t just tients who are well-off and well-connected are prescribe it to you. But you still may be able likelier to have access to better healthcare. The to get to try it. best medical professionals are more likely to be aware of compassionate use, and ongoing Maybe the drug is being tested on volunteers drug development. In fact, there is no reliable who are healthy or in patients who have the online resource for medical professionals to condition or disease or in animals. These tests find which drugs are available for compassion- are known as “clinical trials,” a series of stud- ate use. To find out about compassionate use, ies done to make sure that a new drug is safe, you must have access to someone in the know effective, and either equivalent to or better than about what’s in the development pipeline, or other already-available options. In this case, you being tested in clinical trials. might decide to volunteer for one of the clinical trials in order to try to get the new drug. But, Access is not the only ethical problem raised if you are too sick for the clinical trial, live too by compassionate use. Without patients partic- far away from where it is being conducted, or ipating in clinical trials, we won’t get the data decide you do not want to join the clinical trial needed to prove that a new drug is safe and for fear of being assigned to a placebo arm, you effective. In fact, without people participating in may choose to ask the company developing the clinical trials, the federal Food and Drug Ad- drug to let you use it. This is called “compas- ministration (FDA) won’t have enough data to sionate use” of an unapproved medication or decide whether to approve a new drug, and un- treatment. However, the company developing less it’s approved, a drug can’t be sold or used the new medical product is not required to say in the United States. If fewer people participate ‘yes’ to requests for compassionate use. Some in clinical trials, that means it will take longer drug companies have laid out procedures for to conduct those studies, which means it will “compassionate use” requests. However, these take longer for the FDA to make a decision. This guidelines are often vague and confusing, and could cause a delay for future patients to have sometimes companies don’t follow them. access to new, potentially life-saving drugs. If you’re sick or dying from an untreatable So, what will happen when it becomes easier disease, you could imagine how badly you’d for patients, who otherwise would be en- rolling in clinical trials, to access the drug in development through compassionate use? DC 1/27/2020 In using an unapproved drug, device, or treat- fects us all. Even if you are healthy now, you may ment, you are potentially causing more harm someday need a drug that is still in development. than good. It is even possible that you could die prematurely from using an unapproved drug. However, drug development is a long and Even a drug that seems promising in early clinical complex process without a guaranteed posi- trials can act differently in sicker patients, which tive outcome. As you can see from the chart could be the case for many people requesting below, the entire process of drug develop- Compassionate Use. Perhaps if you are getting ment-- from discovering a medicine to finish- sicker every day, and you know that you will ing late stage clinical trials-- can span many probably die anyway, you’re willing to take the years on average. In some rare cases, the pro- risk. Still, compassionate use is a complex issue cess can last twenty years or more. What’s that affects not only the patient, but also drug even more alarming is how unlikely it is that a companies, the drug development process, and drug in development will even make it to the the entire healthcare system. In fact, because market. On average, only 1 in 5,000 new early nobody knows what diseases or conditions they stage potential drugs successfully make it to may someday develop, compassionate use af- the pharmacy shelves. 10,000-15,000 Compounds Drug Pre- FDA Clinical Trials Discovery Clinical Review Manufacturing 20--100 100-500 1,000-5,000 Volunteers Volunteers Volunteers Pre-Discovery IND Submitted NDA Submitted *Source: ACRO DC 1/27/2020 2. DEFINITIONS agnosis, monitoring, or treatment of a serious disease or condition if the following condi- tions are met. 1. The person’s physician determines that there is no comparable or satisfactory alternative therapy available to diagnose, Compassionate Use monitor, or treat the person’s disease or Compassionate use describes the treatment of condition, and that the probable risk to the a seriously ill or terminal patient who has ex- person from the investigational product is hausted all possible approved drugs and thera- not greater than the probable risk from the pies. These patients seek access to unapproved disease or condition; investigational drugs as a last resort, often 2. FDA determines that there is sufficient accepting risk that the treatment may not work, evidence of the safety and effectiveness or that it may even do more harm than good. of the investigational product to support its use in the particular circumstance The term Compassionate Use was designed 3. FDA determines that providing the investi- to make clear that the drug was being admin- gational product will not interfere with the istered primarily to help the patient, not to initiation, conduct, or completion of clinical gain data, as in formal clinical trials. However, investigation to support marketing approval sometimes data are collected from people 4. The sponsor (generally the company de- who get drugs through compassionate use. veloping the investigational product for Also, drug companies and others do not like commercial use) or the clinical investigator the term Compassionate Use. After all, if they submits a clinical protocol (a document decline a patient’s request, that makes them that describes the treatment plan for the seem automatically non-compassionate! How- patient) that is consistent with the FDA’s ever, there may be very good reasons to de- statute and applicable regulation for INDs cline a request. For example, the supply of the or investigational device exemption appli- drug-in-development may be so limited that cations (IDE’s), describing the use of the there is already barely enough to go around. investigational product. So, there are a variety of other terms for Com- Also under FDA’s statute, a sponsor or a phy- passionate Use. The FDA calls it “Expanded sician may submit a protocol intended to pro- Access.” Other terms include “Early Access vide widespread access to an investigational Cohort Programs,” “Single Patient IND,” “Sin- product. In this scenario, FDA will permit the gle Patient Requests,” and “Emergency IND.” investigational product to be made available Internationally, Compassionate Use is referred under a treatment IND or treatment IDE if cer- to as “Named Patient Program,” “Temporary tain criteria are met.
Recommended publications
  • A Multicenter, Multi-Outbreak, Randomized, Controlled Safety And
    2018 Ebola MCM RCT Protocol Page 1 of 92 IND#: 125530 CONFIDENTIAL 4 October 2019, version 7.0 A Multicenter, Multi-Outbreak, Randomized, Controlled Safety and Efficacy Study of Investigational Therapeutics for the Treatment of Patients with Ebola Virus Disease Short Title: 2018 Ebola MCM RCT Protocol Sponsored by: Office of Clinical Research Policy and Regulatory Operations (OCRPRO) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 5601 Fishers Lane Bethesda, MD 20892 NIH Protocol Number: 19-I-0003 Protocol IND #: 125530 ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT03719586 Date: 4 October 2019 Version: 7.0 CONFIDENTIAL This document is confidential. No part of it may be transmitted, reproduced, published, or used by other persons without prior written authorization from the study sponsor and principal investigator. 2018 Ebola MCM RCT Protocol Page 2 of 92 IND#: 125530 CONFIDENTIAL 4 October 2019, version 7.0 KEY ROLES DRC Principal Investigator: Jean-Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum, MD, PhD Director-General, DRC National Institute for Biomedical Research Professor of Microbiology, Kinshasa University Medical School Kinshasa Gombe Democratic Republic of the Congo Phone: +243 898949289 Email: [email protected] Other International Investigators: see Appendix E Statistical Lead: Lori Dodd, PhD Biostatistics Research Branch, DCR, NIAID 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 4C31 Rockville, MD 20852 Phone: 240-669-5247 Email: [email protected] U.S. Principal Investigator: Richard T. Davey, Jr., MD Clinical Research Section, LIR, NIAID, NIH Building 10, Room 4-1479, Bethesda,
    [Show full text]
  • Eradicating Ebola: Lessons Learned and Medical Advancements Hearing
    ERADICATING EBOLA: LESSONS LEARNED AND MEDICAL ADVANCEMENTS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFRICA, GLOBAL HEALTH, GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS, AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 4, 2019 Serial No. 116–44 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/, http://docs.house.gov, or http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–558PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York, Chairman BRAD SHERMAN, California MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Ranking GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York Member ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia STEVE CHABOT, Ohio THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida JOE WILSON, South Carolina KAREN BASS, California SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts TED S. YOHO, Florida DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois AMI BERA, California LEE ZELDIN, New York JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas JIM SENSENBRENNER, Wisconsin DINA TITUS, Nevada ANN WAGNER, Missouri ADRIANO ESPAILLAT, New York BRIAN MAST, Florida TED LIEU, California FRANCIS ROONEY, Florida SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania BRIAN FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania DEAN PHILLIPS, Minnesota JOHN CURTIS, Utah ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota KEN BUCK, Colorado COLIN ALLRED, Texas RON WRIGHT, Texas ANDY LEVIN, Michigan GUY RESCHENTHALER, Pennsylvania ABIGAIL SPANBERGER, Virginia TIM BURCHETT, Tennessee CHRISSY HOULAHAN, Pennsylvania GREG PENCE, Indiana
    [Show full text]
  • Brincidofovir Is Highly Efficacious in Controlling Adenoviremia In
    Brincidofovir is highly efficacious in controlling adenoviremia in pediatric recipients of hematopoietic cell transplant Prashant Hiwarkar,1 Persis Amrolia,2 Ponni Sivaprakasam,3 Su Han Lum,4 Hemalatha Doss,5 Ciara O’Rafferty,1 Toni Petterson,6 Katharine Patrick,7 Juliana Silva,2 Mary Slatter,5 Sarah Lawson,1 Kanchan Rao,2 Colin Steward,3 Adam Gassas,3 Paul Veys,2 Robert Wynn4 On behalf of the UK Paediatric BMT Group 1Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK; 2Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London; 3Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK; 4Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK; 5Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; 6Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK; 7Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK Address for Correspondence: [email protected] Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow transplantation Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, UK B4 6NH Tel. +44 (0)121 333 9999 Key points Brincidofovir has superior anti-adenoviral activity and safety profile compared to Cidofovir. Brincidofovir is highly efficacious in controlling adenoviraemia during lymphopenic phase of HCT. Summary Cidofovir is pre-emptively used for controlling adenoviremia and preventing disseminated viral disease in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients but does not lead to resolution of viremia without T-cell immune-reconstitution. The lipid conjugated prodrug of Cidofovir, Brincidofovir, has improved oral bioavailability and achieves higher intracellular concentrations of active drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever: Properties of the Pathogen and Development of Vaccines and Chemotherapeutic Agents O
    ISSN 00268933, Molecular Biology, 2015, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 480–493. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2015. Original Russian Text © O.I. Kiselev, A.V. Vasin, M.P. Shevyryova, E.G. Deeva, K.V. Sivak, V.V. Egorov, V.B. Tsvetkov, A.Yu. Egorov, E.A. RomanovskayaRomanko, L.A. Stepanova, A.B. Komissarov, L.M. Tsybalova, G.M. Ignatjev, 2015, published in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2015, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 541–554. REVIEWS UDC 578.2,578.76 Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever: Properties of the Pathogen and Development of Vaccines and Chemotherapeutic Agents O. I. Kiseleva, A. V. Vasina, b, M. P. Shevyryovac, E. G. Deevaa, K. V. Sivaka, V. V. Egorova, V. B. Tsvetkova, d, A. Yu. Egorova, E. A. RomanovskayaRomankoa, L. A. Stepanovaa, A. B. Komissarova, L. M. Tsybalovaa, and G. M. Ignatjeva a Institute of Influenza, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 197376 Russia; email: [email protected] b St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251 Russia c Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 127994 Russia d Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Moscow, 119991 Russia Received December 29, 2014; in final form, January 16, 2015 Abstract—Ebola hemorrhagic fever (EHF) epidemic currently ongoing in West Africa is not the first among numerous epidemics in the continent. Yet it seems to be the worst EHF epidemic outbreak caused by Ebola virus Zaire since 1976 as regards its extremely large scale and rapid spread in the population. Experiments to study the agent have continued for more than 20 years. The EHF virus has a relatively simple genome with seven genes and additional reading frame resulting from RNA editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinase Inhibitors and Nucleoside Analogues As Novel Therapies to Inhibit HIV-1 Or ZEBOV Replication
    Kinase Inhibitors and Nucleoside Analogues as Novel Therapies to Inhibit HIV-1 or ZEBOV Replication by Stephen D. S. McCarthy A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology University of Toronto © Copyright by Stephen D. S. McCarthy (2017) Kinase Inhibitors and Nucleoside Analogues as Novel Therapies to Inhibit HIV-1 or ZEBOV Replication Stephen D.S. McCarthy Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology University of Toronto 2017 Abstract Without a vaccine for Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1), or approved therapy for treating Zaire Ebolavirus (ZEBOV) infection, new means to treat either virus during acute infection are under intense investigation. Repurposing tyrosine kinase inhibitors of known specificity may not only inhibit HIV-1 replication, but also treat associated inflammation or neurocognitive disorders caused by chronic HIV-1 infection. Moreover, tyrosine kinase inhibitors may effectively treat other infections, including ZEBOV. In addition, established nucleoside/nucleotide analogues that effectively inhibit HIV-1 infection, could also be repurposed to inhibit ZEBOV replication. In this work the role of two host cell kinases, cellular protoncogene SRC (c-SRC) and Protein Tyrosine Kinase 2 Beta (PTK2B), were found to have key roles during early HIV-1 replication in primary activated CD4+ T-cells ex vivo. siRNA knockdown of either kinase increased intracellular reverse transcripts and decreased nuclear proviral integration, suggesting they act at the level of pre-integration complex (PIC) formation or PIC nuclear translocation. c-SRC siRNA knockdown consistently reduced p24 levels of IIIB(X4) and Ba-L(R5) infection, or luciferase ii activity of HXB2(X4) or JR-FL(R5) recombinant viruses, prompting further drug inhibition studies of this kinase.
    [Show full text]
  • Situación Actual Del Tratamiento Farmacológico Frente a La Enfermedad Causada Por El Virus Ébola
    Revisión Jordi Reina Situación actual del tratamiento farmacológico frente a la enfermedad causada por el virus Ébola Unidad de Virología. Servicio de Microbiología. Hospital Universitario Son Espases. Palma de Mallorca RESUMEN Current status of drug treatment against the disease caused by the Ebola virus La reciente epidemia de enfermedad causada por el virus Ébola ha puesto en evidencia la necesidad de desarrollar y dis- ABSTRACT poner de fármacos específicos para hacer frente a esta entidad. De acuerdo con los datos virológicos se han diseñado algunos The recent epidemic of disease caused by the Ebola virus fármacos nuevos y se ha comprobado que otros podrían tener has highlighted the need to develop specific drugs and have to eficacia frente a este virus. deal with this entity. According to virological analysis they have Las principales líneas terapéuticas se basan en la inmu- been designed to give you some new drugs and are proven to noterapia (suero de pacientes convalescientes y anticuerpos others might be effective against this virus. monoclonales específicos), en fármacos antivirales (favipiora- The main lines of therapy are based on immunotherapy vir, BCX4430, Brincidofovir), RNAs de interferencia (TKM-Ébola) (convalescent serum of patients and specific monoclonal an- y oligonucleótidos sin sentido (morfolino fosforodiamidato) y tibodies), antiviral drugs (favipiravir, BCX4430, brincidofovir), otros fármacos no antivirales (clomifeno, NSC62914, FGI-103, interfering RNAs (TKM-Ebola) and antisense oligonucleotides amilorida y la ouabaina). (morpholino phosphorodiamidate) and other drugs no antiviral Los estudios existentes son escasos y principalmente en (clomiphene NSC62914, FGI-103, amiloride and ouabain). modelos animales y los ensayos clínicos han quedado la ma- Existing studies are scarce and mainly in animal models yoría inconclusos por la disminución drástica del número de and clinical trials have been inconclusive most by the drastic nuevos casos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Brincidofovir in Preparation for a Potential Smallpox Outbreak
    viruses Perspective The Role of Brincidofovir in Preparation for a Potential Smallpox Outbreak Scott A. Foster 1,*, Scott Parker 2 ID and Randall Lanier 1 1 Chimerix, Durham, NC 27713, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-919-597-7741 Received: 29 September 2017; Accepted: 26 October 2017; Published: 30 October 2017 Abstract: Smallpox (variola) virus is considered a Category A bioterrorism agent due to its ability to spread rapidly and the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with infection. Current recommendations recognize the importance of oral antivirals and call for having at least two smallpox antivirals with different mechanisms of action available in the event of a smallpox outbreak. Multiple antivirals are recommended due in large part to the propensity of viruses to become resistant to antiviral therapy, especially monotherapy. Advances in synthetic biology heighten concerns that a bioterror attack with variola would utilize engineered resistance to antivirals and potentially vaccines. Brincidofovir, an oral antiviral in late stage development, has proven effective against orthopoxviruses in vitro and in vivo, has a different mechanism of action from tecovirimat (the only oral smallpox antiviral currently in the US Strategic National Stockpile), and has a resistance profile that reduces concerns in the scenario of a bioterror attack using genetically engineered smallpox. Given the devastating potential of smallpox as a bioweapon, preparation of a multi-pronged defense that accounts for the most obvious bioengineering possibilities is strategically imperative. Keywords: smallpox; variola virus; bioterrorism; bioweapon; brincidofovir; CMX001; antiviral 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Computational Approach for Virtual Hit Identification Against
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Integrated Computational Approach for Virtual Hit Identification against Ebola Viral Proteins VP35 and VP40 Muhammad Usman Mirza 1,2,*,† and Nazia Ikram 2 1 Centre for Research in Molecular Medicine (CRiMM), The University of Lahore, Defense Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan 2 Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +92-333-839-6037 † Current address: Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Medicinal Chemistry, University of Leuven, Leuven B-3000, Belgium. Academic Editors: Christo Z. Christov and Tatyana Karabencheva-Christova Received: 28 July 2016; Accepted: 22 September 2016; Published: 26 October 2016 Abstract: The Ebola virus (EBOV) has been recognised for nearly 40 years, with the most recent EBOV outbreak being in West Africa, where it created a humanitarian crisis. Mortalities reported up to 30 March 2016 totalled 11,307. However, up until now, EBOV drugs have been far from achieving regulatory (FDA) approval. It is therefore essential to identify parent compounds that have the potential to be developed into effective drugs. Studies on Ebola viral proteins have shown that some can elicit an immunological response in mice, and these are now considered essential components of a vaccine designed to protect against Ebola haemorrhagic fever. The current study focuses on chemoinformatic approaches to identify virtual hits against Ebola viral proteins (VP35 and VP40), including protein binding site prediction, drug-likeness, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, metabolic site prediction, and molecular docking. Retrospective validation was performed using a database of non-active compounds, and early enrichment of EBOV actives at different false positive rates was calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Library of Nucleotide Analogues Terminate RNA Synthesis Catalyzed by Polymerases of Coronaviruses Causing SARS and COVID-19
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.058776; this version posted April 25, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. A Library of Nucleotide Analogues Terminate RNA Synthesis Catalyzed by Polymerases of Coronaviruses Causing SARS and COVID-19 Steffen Jockusch1,2,#, Chuanjuan Tao1,3,#, Xiaoxu Li1,3,#, Thomas K. Anderson5,6, Minchen Chien1,3, Shiv Kumar1,3, James J. Russo1,3, Robert N. Kirchdoerfer5,6,*, Jingyue Ju1,3,4,* 1Center for Genome Technology and Biomolecular Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; Departments of 2 Chemistry, 3Chemical Engineering, and 4Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; 5Departments of Biochemistry and 6Institute of Molecular Virology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 #SJ, CT and XL contributed equally to this work. *To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] (JJ); [email protected] (RNK) Abstract SARS-CoV-2, a member of the coronavirus family, is responsible for the current COVID-19 worldwide pandemic. We previously demonstrated that five nucleotide analogues inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 RNA- dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), including the active triphosphate forms of Sofosbuvir, Alovudine, Zidovudine, Tenofovir alafenamide and Emtricitabine. We report here the evaluation of a library of additional nucleoside triphosphate analogues with a variety of structural and chemical features as inhibitors of the RdRps of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. These features include modifications on the sugar (2’ or 3’ modifications, carbocyclic, acyclic, or dideoxynucleotides) or on the base.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Clinical Digest
    2014-2015 STUDENT CLINICAL DIGEST Presented by the Student College of Clinical Pharmacy— the official UGA chapter of American College of Clinical Pharmacy Volume 1, Issue 4 Clinical Pharmacist Focus ences and humble advice to our tered. I wanted to be a generalist students. and didn’t want to specialize out of fear of being too narrowly Why did you decide to pursue a focused and lacking variety. I residency? liked being able to dip my feet in other fields, and this has really I decided to pursue a residency helped me in the positions I’ve because of the opportunities held. available to me as a 4th year stu- dent on rotation at Emory Uni- What made you switch from versity Medical Center. During hospital to academia? this APPE, it was the 1st time I Michael Neville, Pharm. D., saw pharmacist working with the Someone told me many years ago BCPS, FASHP surgery team, internal medicine, they thought I would be a really intensive care unit, and transplant. great teacher and other people INSIDE THIS By Khushbu Tejani, Pharm D. Candi- What really impressed me was pointed it out a few more times ISSUE: date seeing the pharmacists being during my career. Both my par- proactive and contributing to ents come from an educational In this issue, we meet Dr. Michael patient care in a way that I never background and wanted me to Neville, a clinical pharmacist as saw before. While there, they got follow. I initially did not want to Clinical 1 well as former Clinical Associate to know me and asked me to pursue academia but it runs in my Pharmacist Focus Professor at the College of Phar- consider applying for their resi- blood.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Patients with Ebola Virus Disease: Clinical and Operational Lessons Learned
    Management of Patients with Ebola Virus Disease: Clinical and Operational Lessons Learned Colleen Kraft, MD, MSc Steven J. Lisco, MD, FCCM, FCCP Serious Communicable Diseases Unit Nebraska Biocontainment Unit Emory University Hospital University of Nebraska Medical Center Atlanta, GA Omaha, NE Disclosures • Lisco – None • Kraft – None Learning Objectives • Understand the history of Ebola Virus Disease • Review and recognize the clinical concerns in patients infected with Ebola virus • Describe the design, clinical workflow, and utilization of a biocontainment unit • Recognize the logistical challenges presented by the care of patients infected with Ebola virus and other highly pathogenic contagions and implications for healthcare workers in the biocontainment unit environment Recognize this Bill? How about now? Perhaps the only good news from the tragic Ebola epidemic in Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia is that it may serve as a wake-up call: we must prepare for future epidemics of diseases that may spread more effectively than Ebola. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1502918 http://awesome.good.is/transparency/web/1108/deadliest-pandemics/transparency.jpg (accessed 2.11.15) Ebola: Virology • Filovirus (Latin for ‘thread’): elongated structure, -ssRNA • 6 subtypes • Zaire <<<< Currently active • Sudan • Bundibugyo • Cote d’Ivoire/Tai Forest • Reston (not pathogenic to humans) • Lloviu (no human infections identified) • Viral Hemorrhagic Fever • One of four viruses EBV Disease • Ebola virus was discovered in 1976 near the Ebola River in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo • Outbreaks have appeared sporadically in Africa • The 2014 outbreak is the first in West Africa, and the largest outbreak ever recorded www.cdc.gov 22 PREVIOUS EBV OUTBREAKS Mylne, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola Virus Disease October 2014 • $12.00 US
    SPECIAL DIGITAL ISSUE: Ebola Virus Disease October 2014 • $12.00 US EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE A Primer for Infection Preventionists Ebola Virus Disease: A Primer for Infection Preventionists By Kelly M. Pyrek ccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Ebola — previously known as AEbola hemorrhagic fever — is a rare and deadly disease caused by infection with one of the Ebola virus strains. Ebola can cause disease in humans and non- human primates. Ebola is caused by infection with a virus of the family Filoviridae, genus Ebolavirus. There Ebola, previously known are five identified Ebola virus species, four of which are known to cause disease in humans: Ebola virus as Ebola hemorrhagic (Zaire ebolavirus); Sudan virus (Sudan ebolavirus); fever, is a rare and Taï Forest virus (Taï Forest ebolavirus, formerly Côte d’Ivoire ebolavirus); and Bundibugyo virus (Bundibugyo deadly disease caused ebolavirus). The fifth, Reston virus (Reston ebolavirus), by infection with one of has caused disease in non-human primates, but not in humans. the Ebola virus strains. Ebola was first discovered in 1976 near the Ebola River in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Since then, outbreaks have appeared sporadically in Africa. The natural reservoir host of Ebola virus remains unknown; however, on the basis of evidence and the nature of similar viruses, researchers believe that the virus is animal-borne and that bats are the most likely reservoir. Four of the five virus strains occur in an animal host native to Africa. INFECTION CONTROL TODAY Ebola Virus Disease www.infectioncontroltoday.com 3 The Outbreak Situation at Home and Abroad: An Update As of Oct.
    [Show full text]