DOCSLIB.ORG

National Prison Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Prison Project COVER PHOTOGRAPH: A/P WIDE WORLD PHOTOS 1 Joyce Gilson AUTHORS National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union ACLU National Prison Project Founded in 1972 by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the National 915 15th Street NW, 7th Floor Prison Project (NPP) seeks to ensure constitutional conditions of confinement Washington, DC 20005 and strengthen prisoners’ rights through class action litigation and public educa- Tel: (202) 393-4930 tion. Our policy priorities include reducing prison overcrowding, improving pris- Fax: (212) 393-4931 oner medical care, eliminating violence and maltreatment in prisons and jails, and www.aclu.org minimizing the reliance on incarceration as a criminal justice sanction. The Pro- ject also publishes a semi-annual Journal, coordinates a nationwide network of liti- gators, conducts training and public education conferences, and provides expert advice and technical assistance to local community groups and lawyers through- out the country. CO-AUTHORS & CONTRIBUTORS American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana ACLU of Louisiana The ACLU of Louisiana has protected traditional American values as a P.O. Box 56157 guardian of liberty since its founding in 1956. Our mission is to conserve Amer- New Orleans, LA 70156-6157 ica’s original civic values embodied in the U.S. Constitution and the Louisiana Tel: (504) 522-0617 Constitution by working daily in the courts, legislature, and communities. We Toll Free: (866) 522-0617 defend the rights of every man, woman, and child residing in this state against Fax: (504) 522-0618 attempts by the government to take away or limit civil liberties and personal free- www.laaclu.org doms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, as well as federal and state laws. The ACLU of Louisiana provides its services free-of-charge, and without regard to a person’s race, creed, religion, national origin, or sexual orientation. American Civil Liberties Union, Human Rights Program ACLU Human Rights Program th Created in 2004, the ACLU Human Rights Program is dedicated to holding the 125 Broad Street, 18 Fl. U.S. government accountable to universal human rights principles in addition to New York, NY 10004 rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. We incorporate international human (212) 549-2500 rights strategies into ACLU advocacy on issues relating to national security, immi- www.aclu.org grants’ rights, women’s rights and racial justice. 2 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION American Civil Liberties Union, Racial Justice Program ACLU Racial Justice Program th The ACLU Racial Justice Program aims to preserve and extend constitutionally 125 Broad Street, 18 Fl. guaranteed and other rights to segments of the population that historically have New York, NY 10004 been denied those rights on the basis of race, ethnicity or national origin. Our (212) 549-2500 work involves challenges to racial discrimination and issues that have a direct or www.aclu.org disparate impact on communities of color, particularly in the areas of criminal justice, education, and discrimination. In the area of criminal justice, we are ded- icated to reducing the unwarranted and disproportionate targeting and incarcer- ation of people of color. In the area of education, we seek to ensure that all children have access to quality education, regardless of race or ethnicity. Specifi- cally, we have filed civil challenges to the inadequate provision of indigent crimi- nal and juvenile defense, pre- and post-9/11 racial profiling, and disparate educational opportunities. We also have done litigation and other advocacy, including public education and community organizing, against the racially dis- proportionate imposition of incarceration and the school-to-prison pipeline. Human Rights Watch Human Rights Watch Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor rights abuses in some seventy counties around the world. Our reputation for New York, NY 10118 timely, reliable disclosures has made us an essential source of information for Tel: (212) 290-4700 those concerned with human rights. We address the human rights practices of Fax: (212) 736-1300 governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic www.hrw.org and religious persuasions. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law, and a vigorous civil soci- ety; we document and denounce murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment discrimination, and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Our goal is to hold governments accountable if they transgress the human rights of their people. Human Rights Watch contributed to the section of the report on the abuse of prisoners at the Jena Correctional Facility. Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana The Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana’s mission is to transform the juvenile 1600 Oretha Castle Haley Boulevard justice system into one that builds on the strengths of young people, families and New Orleans, LA 70113 communities in order to instill hope and to ensure children are given the greatest Tel: (504) 522-5437 opportunities to grow and thrive. Our goals are: Fax: (504) 522-5430 • to create and support an effective and innovative juvenile defense system; www.jjpl.org • to alleviate unconstitutional conditions of confinement for juveniles, both pre- and post-adjudication; and • to work collaboratively with existing organizations and resources to develop and expand rehabilitation efforts and alternatives to incarceration for juveniles. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. NAACP Legal Defense and Educa- The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is America's tional Fund, Inc. first not-for-profit civil rights law firm. It's mission is to transform the promise of 99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 equality into reality for African Americans and, ultimately, all individuals in the New York, NY 10013-2897 areas of education, political participation, economic justice and criminal justice. Tel: (212) 965-2200 Fax: (212) 226-7592 LDF has long been involved in racial justice litigation and advocacy in the Gulf www.naacpldf.org South. LDF's current priorities include seeking to bring justice to African Ameri- cans through fair jury selection practices and adequately funded indigent defense systems. Since Hurricane Katrina, LDF has devoted significant resources to working on behalf of the Katrina diaspora, including advocating for voter protec- tion, educational access and criminal justice reform in Orleans Parish. Founded in 1940 under the leadership of Thurgood Marshall, LDF was initially affiliated with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People but has been an entirely separate organization since 1957. LDF contributed to the section of the report on the abuse of prisoners at the Jena Correctional Facility. Safe Streets/Strong Communities Safe Streets/Strong Communities Safe Streets/Strong Communities is a coalition of community organizers, advocates 1600 Oretha Castle Haley Boulevard and attorneys whose mission is to transform the New Orleans criminal justice sys- New Orleans, LA 70113 tem into one that creates safe streets and strong communities for everyone, regard- Tel: (504) 522-3949 less of race or economic status. Safe Streets envisions a public safety system that: Fax: (504) 522-5430 • keeps people safe from all forms of violence and crime including street violence, domestic violence, and law enforcement violence; • is transparent, democratic, fair and accountable to the community it serves; and • supports community-driven responses to crime that are based in best practices. Safe Streets seeks reform of the New Orleans Police Department, the Orleans Parish jail system, and the Orleans Parish criminal court system, including the indigent defense system, in order to achieve our vision of real public safety. 3 Albert G. Couvillion ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the following among the many individuals from vari- ous partner organizations who contributed sections of the report: Joe Cook, Executive Director, and Katie Schwartzmann, Staff Attorney for the ACLU of Louisiana; Derwyn Bunton, Associate Director, and Megan Faunce, Youth Advocate, for the Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana; Ursula Price, Outreach and Investigation Coordinator, Xochitl Bervera, former Interim Co-Director, Norris Henderson, Co-Director, Barry Gerharz, former Legal Coordinator, and Evelyn Lynn, Managing Director, of Safe Streets/Strong Communities; Vanita Gupta, former Assistant Counsel, Olga Akselrod, former Assistant Counsel, Damon, Inc., Todd Hewitt, Assistant Counsel, and Vivian Intermont, Paralegal for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund; E. Vincent Warren, Senior Staff Attorney, Reginald T. Shuford, Senior Staff Attorney, Laleh Ispa- hani, Senior Policy Counsel, Nicole Dixon, Paralegal, and Sean Murray, Intern for the Racial Justice Program of the American Civil Liberties Union; King Downing, National Coordinator for the Campaign Against Racial Profiling of the American Civil Liberties Union; Chandra S. Bhatnagar, Human Rights Advocacy Coordinator for the American Civil Liberties Union; Jamie Fellner, Director, and Alison Parker, Acting Director of the U.S. Program for Human 4 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Rights Watch; and Corinne Carey, former Researcher for Human Rights Watch, and now Deputy Director for Break the Chains. This report focuses on the experience of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Calendar No. 481 104Th Congress, 2D Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Report 104–879
    1 Union Calendar No. 481 104th Congress, 2d Session ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± House Report 104±879 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DURING THE ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS PURSUANT TO CLAUSE 1(d) RULE XI OF THE RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JANUARY 2, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 36±501 WASHINGTON : 1997 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman 1 CARLOS J. MOORHEAD, California JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., PATRICIA SCHROEDER, Colorado Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL MCCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICH BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR SMITH, Texas JOHN BRYANT, Texas STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico JACK REED, Rhode Island ELTON GALLEGLY, California JERROLD NADLER, New York CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia BOB INGLIS, South Carolina MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia XAVIER BECERRA, California STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana JOSEÂ E. SERRANO, New York 2 MARTIN R. HOKE, Ohio ZOE LOFGREN, California SONNY BONO, California SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas FRED HEINEMAN, North Carolina MAXINE WATERS, California 3 ED BRYANT, Tennessee STEVE CHABOT, Ohio MICHAEL PATRICK FLANAGAN, Illinois BOB BARR, Georgia ALAN F. COFFEY, JR., General Counsel/Staff Director JULIAN EPSTEIN, Minority Staff Director 1 Henry J. Hyde, Illinois, elected to the Committee as Chairman pursuant to House Resolution 11, approved by the House January 5 (legislative day of January 4), 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Solitary Confinement Torture in California’S Security Housing Units (Shus), 12,000 People in Prisons Throughout the State Participated in the Hunger Strike
    SOLITARY CONFINEMENT - TORTURE I Thought Solitary Confinement in Iran Was Bad -- Then I Went Inside America's Prisons We throw thousands of people in prison for the books they read, the company they keep, the beliefs they hold. Here's why. of the three American hikers imprisoned in Iran after being apprehended on the Iraqi border in 2009. He spent 26 months in Tehran's Evin Prison, 4 of them in solitary. Bauer is winner of the2013 Hillman Prize for Magazine Journalism for the article below, his special investigation into solitary confinement. The winning feature was published in Mother Jones and supported by the Investigative Fund of the Nation Institute. IT'S BEEN SEVEN MONTHS since I've been inside a prison cell. Now I'm back, sort of. The experience is eerily like my dreams, where I am a prisoner in another man's cell. Like the cell I go back to in my sleep, this one is built for solitary confinement. I'm taking intermittent, heaving breaths, like I can't get enough air. This still happens to me from time to time, especially in tight spaces. At a little over 11 by 7 feet, this cell is smaller than any I've ever inhabited. You can't pace in it. Like in my dreams, I case the space for the means of staying sane. Is there a TV to watch, a book to read, a round object to toss? The pathetic artifacts of this inmate's life remind me of objects that were once everything to me: a stack of books, a handmade chessboard, a few scattered pieces of artwork taped to the concrete, a family photo, large manila envelopes full of letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Books-Library.Online-10151911Lf5w5.Pdf
    CHAPTER 11 Press and Public Access to the Judicial Processes, Records, Places, and Meetings My relationship doesn’t fall under the Freedom of Information Act. I keep it to myself. I don’t think it’s too much to ask. —Actress Julia Roberts1 The First Amendment protects the press in two important areas. First, the govern- ment cannot interfere with the publication of material except under unusual cir- cumstances such as when national security is at stake. Second, publishers generally do not have to fear criminal sanctions. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has never explicitly recognized a First Amendment right to gather information. In those rare instances in which the Court has enunciated the rights of the media to have access to information, places, or events such criminal trials, the Court has done so on the ground that the press acts as a surrogate for the public. The Court clings to the principle that the press can claim no greater rights of access than those afforded the public under the U.S. Constitution. Thus the press faces the unfortu- nate dilemma of having broad freedom to publish but considerably less freedom to ferret out the truth. The situation may be due largely to the fact that the press at the time the Constitution was written consisted primarily of “party organs” financed by political and other special interest groups that had little concern with objectivity, fairness, and truth. They were simply seeking to inform and influence their constitu- ents and to criticize their opponents, not necessarily to serve as a watchdog over the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Inmate Litigation Margo Schlanger Harvard Law School, [email protected]
    University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 2003 Inmate Litigation Margo Schlanger Harvard Law School, [email protected] Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1296 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles Part of the Courts Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Schlanger, Margo. "Inmate Litigation." Harv. L. Rev. 116, no. 6 (2003): 1555-706. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME 116 APRIL 2003 NUMBER 6 HARVARD LAW REVIEW I ARTICLE INMATE LITIGATION Margo Schlanger TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION r557 I. INMATE LITIGATION TRENDS r565 A. The Varied Subject Matter ofInmate Litigation r570 B. Inmate Litigation Rates r575 C. Inmate Filing Rates over Time: The "Deluge" r578 D. OfBabies and Bath Water: The Processing ofInmate Cases r587 II. OUTCOMES IN INMATE CASES (PRIOR TO THE PLRA) r590 A. Outcomes: The Data r593 B. Outcomes: Explanations r605 1. Limited Legal Rights/Exacting Decision Standard , r605 2. Easy Access to Courts r 607 3. The Absence of Counsel r609 4· Obstacles to Settlement. r6 r4 (a) The Impact of the Low Quality of the Docket r6r4 (b) Asymmetric Information r6r6 (c) Low Litigation Costs r6r7 (d) Perceived High External Settlement Costs r6r7 (e) Corrections Culture r620 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Division
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 401 561 CS 215 569 TITLE Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (79th, Anaheim, CA, August 10-13, 1996). Law Division. INSTITUTION Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. PUB DATE Aug 96 NOTE 456p.; For other sections of these proceedings, see CS 215 569-580. PUB TYPE Collected Works Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC19 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Copyrights; *Court Litigation; *Freedom of Information; *Freedom of Speech; *Government Role; Homosexuality; Juvenile Courts; Libel and Slander; Policy Formation; Programming (Broadcast); Telecommunications; War; World Wide Web IDENTIFIERS Fairness Doctrine; Media Coverage; Prisoners Rights; Telecommunications Act 1996 ABSTRACT The law section of the Proceedings contains the following 12 papers: "Middle Justice: Anthony Kennedy's Freedom of Expression Jurisprudence" (Evelyn C. Ellison); "Defending the News Media's Right of Access to the Battlefield" (Timothy H. Hoyle); "The Freedom of Information Act and Access to Computerized Government - Information" (Hsiao-Yin Hsueh); "Opening the Doors to Juvenile Court: Is There an Emerging Right of Public Access?" (Thomas A. Hughes); "Linking Copyright to Home Pages" (Matt Jackson); "Protecting Expressive Rights on Society's Fringe: Social Change and Gay and Lesbian Access to Forums" 'Koehler) ;'Thy Nature of Defamation: Social h,res an,. Accusations of Homosexuality" (Elizabeth M. Koehler); "Radio Public Affairs Programming since the Fairness Doctrine" (Kenneth D. Loomis); "Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. Revisited: An Assessment of the Case's Impact So Far" (Hugh J. Martin); The Third-Person Effect and Attitudes toward Expression" (Mark Paxton); "Televising Executions: A Prisoner's Right of Privacy" (Karl H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Summer 8-4-2011 Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992 Lydia Pelot-Hobbs University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Pelot-Hobbs, Lydia, "Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992" (2011). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 349. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/349 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Organizing for Freedom: The Angola Special Civics Project, 1987-1992 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Urban Studies by Lydia Pelot-Hobbs B.A. Oberlin College 2007 August 2011 Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv Epigraph .............................................................................................................................. v Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corrections Policies and Issues 177
    CORRECTIONS POLICIES 8 AND ISSUES Prisons do not exist in a vacuum; they are part of a political, social, economic, and moral order. — JAMES B. JACOBS, MACROSOCIOLOGY AND IMPRISONMENT, 1977 INTRODUCTION The most consequential issue in American corrections since the early 1980s has been the extent of use of incarceration itself as a crime control measure. Is America better off in 2003 with more than 2 million behind jail and prison bars than it was in 1980, when that number was about 400,000? We will come back to this issue in the international context in chapter 16 at the end of this book. In this chapter, we will look briefly at several other issues that have dominated policy debates regarding institutional corrections in the past decade. After reading the material in this chapter, you should be familiar with: 1. Professionalization and the accreditation movement in corrections. 2. Prison health care. 3. Responding to population increases. 4. Privatization. 5. Race and imprisonment. PROFESSIONALIZATION AND ACCREDITATION Professionalization and accreditation have become important terms in correc- tional administration in the past two decades. Professionalization has to do with gaining professional status for persons working in corrections, while acc- reditation seeks comparable status for their employing organizations. “Professional” is a commonplace term in America today. In its simplest forms, it means one who follows an occupation as a means of earning a living— a professional baseball player as opposed to someone who just plays ball for ISBN: 0-536-16545-9 the fun of it—or merely someone who is an expert at what he does—such as an experienced plumber.
    [Show full text]
  • Orleans Parish Prison Intake Processing Center After the Storm
    Orleans Parish Prison Intake Processing Center after the storm 12 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION a whole, a country with the highest national incarceration rate in the world.4 What makes OPP’s massive expansion so surprising is the fact that it happened during a period of time when the population of Orleans Parish decreased by over 100,000 peo- ple. During Sheriff Foti’s tenure, the capacity of OPP increased nearly 1000% (from 850 to 8500), while the popu- lation of Orleans Parish decreased over 18% (from over 593,000 in 1970 to under 485,000 in 2000).5 Prior to Hurricane Katrina, 60% of OPP’s population on any given day was made up of men and women arrested on attachments, traffic violations, or municipal charges6 — typi- cally for parking violations, public drunkenness, or failure to pay a fine. Most of the prisoners at OPP were pre-trial detainees, meaning they had not been convicted of any crime. Thus, aside from its enormous size, OPP’s population made it resemble a local jail rather than a prison, which generally holds individuals convicted of crimes that carry a sentence of more than one year of incarceration.7 I. ORLEANS PARISH PRISON As OPP’s population exploded, the categories of persons held at the jail changed. In 1970 there were only four to ten women in the jail at any given time. At the time of Hurricane Katrina, OPP held approximately 670 women.8 A. The Unchecked Growth of Orleans Like women, juveniles were also initially held in the Old Parish Prison Parish Prison.
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Juvenile Justice Facilities
    CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:lamd - Docket Report Page 1 of 60 CLOSED, FRC U.S. District Court Middle District of Louisiana (Baton Rouge) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:97-cv-00665-FJP In Re: Tallula/Madison Yth, et al v. Date Filed: 07/16/1997 Assigned to: Judge Frank J. Polozola Jury Demand: None Demand: $0 Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act Rights Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Tallulah Correctional Center for represented by Keith B. Nordyke Youth Keith B. Nordyke, LLC also known as 427 Mayflower Street Swanson Correctional Center Madison Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Parish Unit 225-383-1601 Fax: 225-383-2725 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED June E. Denlinger P. O. Box 237 Baton Rouge, LA 70821 866-455-4529 Fax: 866-492-4529 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Plaintiff Juvenile Plaintiffs represented by David J. Utter Brian B. Juvenile Justice Project of La 1600 Oretha Castle Haley Blvd. New Orleans, LA 70113 US 504-522-5437 Fax: 504-522-5430 FAX LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Addison Kennon Goff, III Goff & Goff P. O. Box 2050 Ruston, LA 71273-2050 318-255-1760 Fax: 318-255-7745 https://ecf.lamd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?759713130620898-L_923_0-1 12/13/2006 CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:lamd - Docket Report Page 2 of 60 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED P. Scott Wolleson The Boles Law Firm P. O. Box 2065 1818 Avenue of America Monroe, LA 71207-2065 318-388-4050 Fax: 318-998-7115 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Notice Only Tallulah Correctional Center for Youth also known as Swanson Correctional Center Madison Parish Unit Notice Only Richard L Stalder represented by Richard L Stalder Secretary of DOC P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • P.O. Box 82531 | Baton Rouge, La 70884 Phone: 225-767-7640
    P.O. BOX 82531 | BATON ROUGE, LA 70884 PHONE: 225-767-7640 | FAX: 225-767-7648 www.LACDL.org | [email protected] www.lacdl.org/sexoffenseseminar SEX OFFENSE SEMINAR & SOCIAL AGENDA Thursday, October 29, 2015 (6 CLE Hours Total) 8:00 - 8:30 a.m. Registration & Refreshments 8:15 - 8:30 a.m. Welcome 8:30 - 9:30 a.m. Theories in Contact & Non-Contact Cases, Franz Borghardt, Baton Rouge, LA 9:30 - 9:45 p.m. Break 9:45 - 11:45 a.m. Everything You’ve Ever Wanted to Ask a SANE Nurse, Kim Basinger RN, CA-CP SANE, SANE-A, SANE-P, CFN CFC DABFN, DABLEE, FACFEI, Mt. Vernon, TX 11:45 a.m. - 1:15 p.m. Lunch (on your own) 1:15 - 2:15 p.m. Victims Rights Gone Wrong, Elton Richey, Shreveport, LA 2:15 - 2:30 p.m. Break 2:30 - 4:30 p.m. Legislative Update & Case Law Update, David Anderson, Covington, LA & George Steimel, LACDL Lobbyist, Baton Rouge, LA 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. LACDL Sex Offense Social at Merci Beaucoup Friday, October 30, 2015 (6 CLE Hours Total) 8:00 - 8:30 a.m. Registration & Refreshments 8:15 - 8:30 a.m. Welcome 8:30 - 10:30 a.m. Forensic Psychology, Dr. John Simoneaux, Pineville, LA 10:30 - 10:45 a.m. Break 10:45 - 11:45 a.m. Registration A-Z, E. King Alexander, Lake Charles, LA & Danielle Brown, Shreveport, LA 11:45 a.m. - 1:15 p.m. Luncheon with Keynote Speaker, A.M. “Marty” Stroud, III, Shreveport, LA (Additional cost required; no CLE offered) 1:15 - 2:15 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruel and Unusual Punishment Under the Eighth
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ROBERT KING WILKERSON, ET AL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER 00-304-RET-DLD RICHARD STALDER, ET AL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the court on referral from the District Judge for a report and recommendation on defendants’ Re-Urged Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Dismissing All Eighth Amendment Claims (rec. doc. 164). In their motion, defendants’ seek dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which arise from their approximately 28 to 35 year confinements in the Closed Cell Restriction Unit (“CCR” or “lockdown”) at the Louisiana State Penitentiary (“LSP”) at Angola, Louisiana. Defendants also assert qualified immunity for their alleged actions, and res judicata, or claim preclusion.1 The motion is opposed. Background For purposes of this motion, neither plaintiffs nor defendants dispute the fact of plaintiffs’ incarceration or, indeed, many of the particulars of their incarceration in what LSP refers to as “closed cell restriction” or “extended lockdown.” What they dispute is the 1The defendants argue that they are also entitled to summary judgment and qualified immunity on the plaintiffs’ state law claims for the same reasons advanced for the plaintiffs’ federal constitutional claims. 1 Case 3:00-cv-00304-RET-DLD Document 233 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 51 reason for their extended lockdown, its significance, both legally and factually, and its effects on these three plaintiffs. When Herman Wallace and Albert Woodfox arrived at the Louisiana State Penitentiary in 1969 and 1971, respectively, they initially were classified as medium custody inmates and housed with the general prison population.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Contracting Activity
    Vendor Name Address Vendor Contact Vendor Phone Email Address Total Amount 1213 U STREET LLC /T/A BEN'S 1213 U ST., NW WASHINGTON DC 20009 VIRGINIA ALI 202-667-909 $3,181.75 350 ROCKWOOD DRIVE SOUTHINGTON CT 13TH JUROR, LLC 6489 REGINALD F. ALLARD, JR. 860-621-1013 $7,675.00 1417 N STREET NWCOOPERATIVE 1417 N ST NW COOPERATIVE WASHINGTON DC 20005 SILVIA SALAZAR 202-412-3244 $156,751.68 1133 15TH STREET NW, 12TH FL12TH FLOOR 1776 CAMPUS, INC. WASHINGTON DC 20005 BRITTANY HEYD 703-597-5237 [email protected] $200,000.00 6230 3rd Street NWSuite 2 Washington DC 1919 Calvert Street LLC 20011 Cheryl Davis 202-722-7423 $1,740,577.50 4606 16TH STREET, NW WASHINGTON DC 19TH STREET BAPTIST CHRUCH 20011 ROBIN SMITH 202-829-2773 $3,200.00 2013 H ST NWSTE 300 WASHINGTON DC 2013 HOLDINGS, INC 20006 NANCY SOUTHERS 202-454-1220 $5,000.00 3900 MILITARY ROAD NW WASHINGTON DC 202 COMMUNICATIONS INC. 20015 MIKE HEFFNER 202-244-8700 [email protected] $31,169.00 1010 NW 52ND TERRACEPO BOX 8593 TOPEAK 20-20 CAPTIONING & REPORTING KS 66608 JEANETTE CHRISTIAN 785-286-2730 [email protected] $3,120.00 21C3 LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT LL 11 WATERFORD CIRCLE HAMPTON VA 23666 KIPP ROGERS 757-503-5559 [email protected] $9,500.00 1816 12TH STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 21ST CENTURY SCHOOL FUND 20009 MARY FILARDO 202-745-3745 [email protected] $303,200.00 1550 CATON CENTER DRIVE, 21ST CENTURY SECURITY, LLC #ADBA/PROSHRED SECURITY BALTIMORE MD C. MARTIN FISHER 410-242-9224 $14,326.25 22 Atlantic Street CoOp 22 Atlantic Street SE Washington DC 20032 LaVerne Grant 202-409-1813 $2,899,682.00 11701 BOWMAN GREEN DRIVE RESTON VA 2228 MLK LLC 20190 CHRIS GAELER 703-581-6109 $218,182.28 1651 Old Meadow RoadSuite 305 McLean VA 2321 4th Street LLC 22102 Jim Edmondson 703-893-303 $13,612,478.00 722 12TH STREET NWFLOOR 3 WASHINGTON 270 STRATEGIES INC DC 20005 LENORA HANKS 312-618-1614 [email protected] $60,000.00 2ND LOGIC, LLC 10405 OVERGATE PLACE POTOMAC MD 20854 REZA SAFAMEJAD 202-827-7420 [email protected] $58,500.00 3119 Martin Luther King Jr.
    [Show full text]