DOCSLIB.ORG

Index Locorum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61670-6 - The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy Edited by Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld and Malcolm Schofield Index More information Index Locorum Achilles Alcinous Isag. Didasc. iv 445 158 79n12 ix 445 159 79n15 Alexander of aphrodisias [A cro] APr Scholia vet. in Horatii Epist. 11.20 79n12 ii 1.45 153n163, 166n198 18.2–7 150n156 18.12–18 136, 136n141 Aëtius 19.3–10 136 i.3.1–9 25 22.17–19 153n161 i.5.6 427n35 69.26–70.21 78n6 i.6 453 84.12–14 152 i.6.10 471n102 124.8–13 78 i.7 18n66, 453 137 143n147 i.7.23 450 164.27–31 143n147 i.7.33 388, 561n3 177–8 117, 119 i.7.34 456n21, 472 177.25–178.4 116 i.12.4 448n73 177.28–9 99n60 i.13.3 356n2 177.29–30 119 i.17.3 356n2 178.1–4 119 i.18.5 441 178.5–8 120 i.20.1 396n109 180.33–6 439n61 i.20.2 367 183–4 87n33 i.23.4 423 183.34–184.6 88 i.27.3 496n48 184 86n32 i.27.5 465n70 262.28–31 150n155 i.28.4 496n48 278.12–14 143 ii.4.15–17 18n66 284.10–17 75n57, 140n145 ii.20.4 438 284.13–17 137 ii.25.5 445 302.9 77 iv.3.11 545 324.19–22 82 iv.9.1 239 325.31–328.7 82 iv.11 471, 575n33 326.20–2 78n10, 79 iv.11.1–4 575 326.22–328.7 79 iv.12.1 572 326.22–5 80 iv.12.1–5 576n34, 295n1 326.31–2 81 iv.19.4 441 327.33–4 81n17 iv.21.1–4 571 344–5 154 345 105n73 345.13–17 156 [876] © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61670-6 - The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy Edited by Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld and Malcolm Schofield Index More information Index locorum 877 345.24–30 153n161 Ammonius 373.28–35 152 APr. 374.23–35 156n173 28.9–13 136n141 390.1–9 81 70.11–15 152n160 402.1–405.16 75n56 Int. 402.3–19 102 2.31–2 122n114, 123 404.21–4 108n82 90.12–20 78n5 De Sens. 56–63 269n12 [A ndronicus] Fat. Pass. 172.12 536n39 1581 172.17 489n30, n31 173.13 489n30, 536n39 Anonymus in Sophisticos Elenchos 174.1 536n39 58.29–33 166n198 176.14–24 120n109 177.8–9 119n108 Anonymus in Theaetetum 181.3–182.20 533n32 col. 5.18–6.31 681n18, 764 191.30–192.28 450 col. 11.12–40 707n101 192.7 499 col. 22.39–42 282n33 199.14–18 722, 722n148 col. 65.33–9 256n92 199.14–22 725 205.24–206.2 533n32, 538 Anonymus Londinensis 205.30 575n33 xxi.18–23 610n43 206.2–207.3 538 xxi.23–33 608n39 207.5–21 538 xxxiii.43–51 608n39 Mant. 131.5 565 Apollonius Dyscolus 134–6 269n12 Conj. Mixt. 219.12–24 110n88 216.9 775 219.18–19 135n140 216.14–17 561 222.25–6 111n91 216.14–218.6 390 223.1 111n91 216.25–217.2 565n13, 566 218.1–2 561 Apollonius of Perge 218.3 445 Conica Top. i.192.5–11 588 1.19 68n22 8.16–17 155 Apuleius 8.19 155 Int. 8.20–22 155n168 189.1–3 xiii 10.7–10 136 190.3 203n161 10.10–12 136 191.6–15 102 14–15 152n160 200.15–18 155 93.9–10 107, 125 200.15–19 72n41 188.19–28 168 200.17 72 Fr. i (text in Vitelli 159n181, 168n199 201.4–7 136 1902) 209.10–14 138 Aristocles [Alexander of Aphrodisias] ap. Eus. PE SE xiv.18.1–4 244 125.13–18 160n182 xiv.18.2 232n9 170.29 168n199 xiv.19.1–7 251n77 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61670-6 - The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy Edited by Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld and Malcolm Schofield Index More information 878 Index locorum Aristocles (cont.) Int. xiv.19.1 252n81, 254, 256n91 18a6–8 516 xiv.19.2–7 257n94 18b9–11 91n41 xv.2.13 774 18b26–31 516 xv.15.14.1 436 19a7 516 Metaph. Aristoteles 〈.986b21 234n15 APo 〈.992a20–2 588 i.3 231, 508 〈.993b14–19 24n90 71b26–33 508 〉.996a29–b1 251n78 72b19–25 508 〉.998a2–4 587 76a41 585 〉.1002a28–b11 359n12 89b33 454 ⌫.1006a6–9 508 APr. ⌫.1007b20 246n55 45b17 82 ⌫.1008a30–4 245 50a39–b2 78, 81 ⌫.1009b12 239n31 Cael. ⌫.1008b15–19 245n49 270b5–12 461n48 ⌫.1009b19 473n115 271b9–11 588 ⌬.1021b20–33 716n132 278b21–a11 460n41 ⌭.1026a19 452 297a8–b23 421 ⌰.3 360n15 297b23–298b20 421 ⌰.1046b29–32 88n35 303a2–4 356 ⌱.1053a35 246n55 De An. ⌲.5–6 246n55 404a27 239n31 ⌳.8.1074a38–b14 470 409a4 593n10 ⌵.3.1090b5–7 593n10 413b21–4 475n125 MM 415b28 563n9 1205b20ff. 656n41 427a24 473n115 PA EN 670b31–3 603n29 i.7 684n26 677a15–19 603n29 1104a11–14 532 687a7–23 504 1105a32 716 Phys. 1105b18 532 ii.3 479 1109a24–30 732n169 ii.195a33–b3 495 1109b14–23 732n169 iv.208a11–14 442 1109b30–1110a1 514 iv.212a20 473n115 1110b9–17 514 iv.219a18–19 473n115 1113b3–6 514 vi.2 379 1114a31–b4 515 vi.187a1–3 357 1118b8–27 658n45 vi.232b20–233a12 422n23 1144a13–20 731n166 vi.10 356, 359, 377, 378 1144b28–30 716n130 vii.250a19–25 162 1144b32 718n136 viii.250b25 438 1153a2–6 656n41 Polit. 1153a14–15 648 1256b15–22 449n74 1153b19 625 1338a27 473n115 1172a1–8 56 1172b9–15 634n36 Protr. (ed. Düring) 1172b9–1173a13 648n21 Fr. b 13 708n105 1174b2–1175a3 656n43 SE 1179b20–31 705n93 165b23–4 158 GC 179a33ff. 160 315b9 239n31 180a23–b7 162 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61670-6 - The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy Edited by Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld and Malcolm Schofield Index More information Index locorum 879 180b2–7 168n199 Boethius 183b17–33 24 Cic Top. 355–8 134 100b23–6 157 Hyp. Syll. 113a24–32 168 i.1.3 79n10 141b15–22 593n10 i.1.5 79n12 143b11–32 593n11 i.3.2 79n12 i.3.3 79 i [Aristoteles] .9.2–3 80n16 iii Lin. Insec. .1–6 81n17 968a19–22 375n56 Int. ii Mund. 2. .217.26–8 74 ii 39169 412 2. .234 86, 87n33, 527n22 2.ii.234–235 86, 86n32, 87 ii Arius Didymus 2. .234.27–235.4 118 2.ii.412 87n33 ap. Eus. PE xv.20.2 466n77 ap. Stob. aelius urelianus i.11–13 397n110 C A i.105.13–18 395 Acut. Morb. ii i.106.11–13 394n103, 399 .6.32 605n34 i.106.18–23 398 i.106.7 399n115 Calcidius i.132.27 386 In Tim. i.138.14–139.4 483 220 572 i.153.7–22 437 i.161.8–11 396 Cassiodorus i.166.4–27 444 Instit. i.179.2–3 404 ii.3.13 134 i.184.8–10 412 i .213.15–27 440 Celsus Med i (Prooem.) Athenaeus 17 606 Deipn. 18 611 41a–c 741n6 23–4 600n21 59d–f 58n19 27 512, 611 186c 72n40 36 606 267b 740n5 40–4 610n42 336d 235n21 54 509, 611n45 339a 787n16 464d 23n87 Chrysippus 544d 258 ap. Phld. De Piet. 461n44 546f 634n37, 643, 666 (PHerc. 1428) 561c 744, 760 col. 7.31–8.4 ap. Plu. Stoic. Rep. Augustinus 1036f 76 Acad. 1037b 66n8 iii.38 324n6, 450 1052f 563 C.D. 1054c 397n110 viii.7 68n25 Log. Ze–t. (PHerc. 307) Dial. ii.17–26 69 iii.84–6 155n170 iii.13–14 93n45 Ep. v.14, 17 98n57 118.30 269n12 xi.19–30 97n55 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61670-6 - The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy Edited by Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld and Malcolm Schofield Index More information 880 Index locorum Cicero ii.77–8 303n10 Acad ii.78 335, 338 i.38 723 ii.79–83 341 i.39 436 ii.80 341n45 i.40–2 295n1 ii.82 341 i.41 297, 298n3, 312 ii.83 341n44 i.42 305, 307, 317, 319 ii.83–90 342n47 i.43–6 325n7 ii.84 344 i.44 327n12 ii.84–5 309 i.44–5 639 ii.84–6 344n52 i.45 233n11, 328, 330n20, ii.88 343 639 ii.88–90 342n48 i.45–6 329 ii.90 343 i.46 232n7 ii.91 66 ii.16 324n5, 327n12 ii.91–8 345n56, 345n57 ii.17 298n3 ii.93 174 ii.17–31 295n1 ii.93–4 174 ii.20 256n90 ii.94 174 ii.28 346n58 ii.95 159n180, 164, 168, ii.28–9 331n24 351n73 1i.32 347n63, 416n7 ii.96 153n163 ii.33 349 ii.97 169n202 ii.33–4 347n62 ii.98 59n23, 107, 115 ii.33–6 344n54 ii.99 337n39, 348, 349n68 ii.34 611 ii.99–101 348n64 ii.35–6 348n65 ii.101 341n44, 349n68 ii.36 349 ii.103 338 ii.40 341, 344n53, 346 ii.104 337, 337n39, 347n63, ii.41 341 349n68 ii.42 345n56 ii.106 587 ii.47–48 345 ii.108 334, 336 ii.47–58 342n47 ii.109 346n58 ii.50 311 ii.109–10 331n24 ii.51 343 ii.110 346 ii.51–4 342n48 ii.112 302, 303n10 ii.52 343 ii.116 594 ii.54–8 344n52 ii.118 23n85 ii.55 344 ii.119 461n44 ii.58 344n54, 346n60 ii.120 466n76 ii.59 334n32, 338n40 ii.122 609 ii.59–60 325n7 ii.129 23n85 ii.66 327n12 ii.135 777 ii.66–7 334n32 ii.139 336n36 ii.67 326n11, 335n35 ii.142 256n90, 263n3 ii.68 335n34, 338n40 ii.143 71, 84, 106 ii.69 59 ii.143–6 295n1 ii.73 8n19, 237n26 ii.145 65n4 ii.76 256n90 ii.148 336 ii.76–7 327n12 Ad Att.
Recommended publications
  • PDF Download the Pig of Happiness Ebook

    PDF Download the Pig of Happiness Ebook

    THE PIG OF HAPPINESS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Edward Monkton | 32 pages | 15 Jan 2004 | HarperCollins Publishers | 9780007177981 | English | London, United Kingdom The Pig of Happiness PDF Book Our guest practices…. Plato c. It was extremely discouraging and took a few days to recover from, although it was mostly by ego that was injured. I knew Edward Monkton was going to be a success when people started e-mailing me daily saying that it touched their hearts, it made them think, and most important, it made them laugh out loud-again and again. Views Read Edit View history. Philosopher Wisdom Women in philosophy. Necessary Necessary. Jun 20, Connie rated it it was amazing. It gave me a distraction from excel spreadsheets anyway! Aristotle's Psychology. Great read!!! Read more Oct 16, Michelle rated it it was amazing. Augustine follows the Neoplatonic tradition in asserting that happiness lays in the contemplation of the purely intelligible realm. Import charges. One aid to achieving happiness is the tetrapharmakos or the four-fold cure:. Zalta ed. I was disappointed because how was I going to run with a twisted knee? Apr 26, Ronald Boy rated it it was amazing. Feb 22, Ana rated it liked it Shelves: bookcrossing. Pyrrho identified that what prevented people from attaining ataraxia was their beliefs in non- evident matters, i. Stood and read this book to a friend in Barnes and Noble. Our guest,…. Show More Show Less. Thanks for reading. He claims that it is better to be a dissatisfied unhappy person than it is to be a satisfied pig.
  • The Place of Ethics in Aristotle's Philosophy

    The Place of Ethics in Aristotle's Philosophy

    Offprint from OXFORDSTUDIES INANCIENT PHILOSOPHY EDITOR:BRADINWOOD VOLUMEXL Essays in Memory of Michael Frede JAMESALLEN EYJÓLFURKJALAREMILSSON WOLFGANG-RAINERMANN BENJAMINMORISON 3 THEPLACEOFETHICSIN ARISTOTLE’SPHILOSOPHY GEORGEKARAMANOLIS . The issue D the wealth of studies on Aristotle’s ethics, there has been almost nothing, as far as I know, dedicated to considering the place that ethics occupies in Aristotle’s philosophy. This issue does not seem to be interesting to modern students of Aristotle. There was, however, a debate and indeed a controversy about this issue in late antiquity, as I shall show in this paper. There are two questions in- volved here, which are interrelated, and the debate was about both of them. The first concerns the order in which ethics or practical philosophy, more generally, must be studied by the student of Aris- totle’s philosophy. The second concerns the relative significance of this part of philosophy within the framework of Aristotle’s philoso- phical work. Both questions arise from remarks that Aristotle himself makes. The second in particular, some might argue, is addressed by Aris- totle in various parts of his work. In Metaphysics Ε –, for instance, he famously discusses the relative value of theoretical, practical, and productive sciences. Aristotle there argues explicitly that the the- oretical sciences are preferable (hairetōterai) to all others, practical © George Karamanolis It is a pleasure to offer this contribution in honour of Michael Frede, who taught me so much. Drafts of this paper were presented at Princeton, Oxford, and the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Science, University of Athens. I have benefited from the comments of all these audiences.
  • Aspasian Infidelities. on Aspasius' Philosophical Background (EN I)

    Aspasian Infidelities. on Aspasius' Philosophical Background (EN I)

    apeiron 2016; 49(2): 229–259 António Pedro Mesquita* Aspasian Infidelities. On Aspasius’ Philosophical Background (EN I) DOI 10.1515/apeiron-2015-0028 Abstract: The discussion on Aspasius’ philosophical background has benefited in recent years from a wide consensus. According to this consensus, Aspasius should be regarded as a Peripatetic, or even as an “orthodox Peripatetic” (Barnes’ phrase). It is true that Aspasius’ commentary is generally in tune with Aristotle. It is true that he shows an extensive knowledge of Aristotelian research pertinent for the discussions and that he uses Aristotelian concepts, principles, and doctrines with ease as if they were his own, thus denoting an old assimila- tion of those materials and a long accommodation to them. In a word, it is true that Aspasius is an Aristotelian. He is, however, as I will try to show in this paper, an Aristotelian strongly influenced by Stoicism. I will do so by selecting those points from Aspasius’ commentary on book I of the Nicomachean Ethics where the Stoic influence is most flagrantly evident, namely in his interpretation of art (τέχνη), his conception of continence and incontinence and, especially, his interpretation of the relation between happiness, virtue, and external goods in Aristotle. Keywords: Aspasius, Aristotelianism, Stoicism, happiness, virtue, external goods The Consensus The discussion on Aspasius’ philosophical background has benefited in recent years from a wide consensus. A good example of this consensus is the position Barnes sustains on the matter in his excellent “Introduction to Aspasius”, where he states the following1: Next, Aspasius’ philosophical position. Galen calls him a Peripatetic, and it is plain that his pupil taught Galen Peripatetic philosophy.
  • Aristotelianism in the First Century BC

    Aristotelianism in the First Century BC

    CHAPTER 5 Aristotelianism in the First Century BC Andrea Falcon 1 A New Generation of Peripatetic Philosophers The division of the Peripatetic tradition into a Hellenistic and a post- Hellenistic period is not a modern invention. It is already accepted in antiquity. Aspasius speaks of an old and a new generation of Peripatetic philosophers. Among the philosophers who belong to the new generation, he singles out Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon.1 Strabo adopts a similar division. He too distinguishes between the older Peripatetics, who came immediately after Theophrastus, and their successors.2 He collectively describes the latter as better able to do philosophy in the manner of Aristotle (φιλοσοφεῖν καὶ ἀριστοτελίζειν). It remains unclear what Strabo means by doing philosophy in the manner of Aristotle.3 But he certainly thinks that the philosophers who belong to the new generation, and not those who belong to the old one, deserve the title of true Aristotelians. For Strabo, the event separating the old from the new Peripatos is the rediscovery and publication of Aristotle’s writings. We may want to resist Strabo’s negative characterization of the earlier Peripatetics. For Strabo, they were not able to engage in philosophy in any seri- ous way but were content to declaim general theses.4 This may be an unfair judgment, ultimately based on the anachronistic assumption that any serious philosophy requires engagement with an authoritative text.5 Still, the empha- sis that Strabo places on the rediscovery of Aristotle’s writings suggests that the latter were at the center of the critical engagement with Aristotle in the 1 Aspasius, On Aristotle’s Ethics 44.20–45.16.
  • Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM

    Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM

    Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM Western Pre-Socratics Fanon Heraclitus- Greek 535-475 Bayle Panta rhei Marshall Mcluhan • "Everything flows" Roman Jakobson • "No man ever steps in the same river twice" Saussure • Doctrine of flux Butler Logos Harris • "Reason" or "Argument" • "All entities come to be in accordance with the Logos" Dike eris • "Strife is justice" • Oppositional process of dissolving and generating known as strife "The Obscure" and "The Weeping Philosopher" "The path up and down are one and the same" • Theory about unity of opposites • Bow and lyre Native of Ephesus "Follow the common" "Character is fate" "Lighting steers the universe" Neitzshce said he was "eternally right" for "declaring that Being was an empty illusion" and embracing "becoming" Subject of Heideggar and Eugen Fink's lecture Fire was the origin of everything Influenced the Stoics Protagoras- Greek 490-420 BCE Most influential of the Sophists • Derided by Plato and Socrates for being mere rhetoricians "Man is the measure of all things" • Found many things to be unknowable • What is true for one person is not for another Could "make the worse case better" • Focused on persuasiveness of an argument Names a Socratic dialogue about whether virtue can be taught Pythagoras of Samos- Greek 570-495 BCE Metempsychosis • "Transmigration of souls" • Every soul is immortal and upon death enters a new body Pythagorean Theorem Pythagorean Tuning • System of musical tuning where frequency rations are on intervals based on ration 3:2 • "Pure" perfect fifth • Inspired
  • Greek Medical Papyri Archiv Für Papyrusforschung Und Verwandte Gebiete

    Greek Medical Papyri Archiv Für Papyrusforschung Und Verwandte Gebiete

    Greek Medical Papyri Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete Begründet von Ulrich Wilcken Herausgegeben von Jean-Luc Fournet Bärbel Kramer Herwig Maehler Brian McGing Günter Poethke Fabian Reiter Sebastian Richter Beiheft 40 De Gruyter Greek Medical Papyri Text, Context, Hypertext edited by Nicola Reggiani De Gruyter The present volume is published in the framework of the Project “Online Humanities Scholarship: A Digital Medical Library Based on Ancient Texts” (DIGMEDTEXT, Principal Investigator Profes- sor Isabella Andorlini), funded by the European Research Council (Advanced Grant no. 339828) at the University of Parma, Dipartimento di Lettere, Arti, Storia e Società. ISBN 978-3-11-053522-8 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-053640-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-053569-3 ISSN 1868-9337 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No-Derivatives 4.0 License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2019948020 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. © 2019 Nicola Reggiani, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Druck und Bindung: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Table of contents Introduction (Nicola Reggiani) .......................................................................... IX I. Medical Texts From Prescription to Practice:

  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48147-2 — Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture Reviel Netz Index More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48147-2 — Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture Reviel Netz Index More Information Index Aaker, Jennifer, 110, 111 competition, 173 Abdera, 242, 310, 314, 315, 317 longevity, 179 Abel, N. H., 185 Oresteia, 197, 200, 201 Academos, 189, 323, 324, 325, 337 papyri, 15 Academy, 322, 325, 326, 329, 337, 343, 385, 391, Persians, 183 399, 404, 427, 434, 448, 476, 477–8, 512 portraits, 64 Achilles Tatius, 53, 116, 137, 551 Ptolemaic era, 39 papyri, 16, 23 Aeschylus (astronomer), 249 Acta Alexandrinorum, 87, 604 Aesop, 52, 68, 100, 116, 165 adespota, 55, 79, 81–5, 86, 88, 91, 99, 125, 192, 194, in education, 42 196, 206, 411, 413, 542, 574 papyri, 16, 23 Adkin, Neil, 782 Aethiopia, 354 Adrastus, 483 Aetia, 277 Adrastus (mathematician), 249 Africa, 266 Adrianople, 798 Agatharchides, 471 Aedesius (martyr), 734, 736 Agathocles (historian), 243 Aegae, 479, 520 Agathocles (peripatetic), 483 Aegean, 338–43 Agathon, 280 Aegina, 265 Agias (historian), 373 Aelianus (Platonist), 484 agrimensores, 675 Aelius Aristides, 133, 657, 709 Ai Khanoum, 411 papyri, 16 Akhmatova, Anna, 186 Aelius Herodian (grammarian), 713 Albertus Magnus, 407 Aelius Promotus, 583 Albinus, 484 Aenesidemus, 478–9, 519, 520 Alcaeus, 49, 59, 61–2, 70, 116, 150, 162, 214, 246, Aeolia, 479 see also Aeolian Aeolian, 246 papyri, 15, 23 Aeschines, 39, 59, 60, 64, 93, 94, 123, 161, 166, 174, portraits, 65, 67 184, 211, 213, 216, 230, 232, 331 Alcidamas, 549 commentaries, 75 papyri, 16 Ctesiphon, 21 Alcinous, 484 False Legation, 22 Alcmaeon, 310
  • The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought

    The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought

    THE PHENOMENON OF CHANCE IN ANCIENT GREEK THOUGHT by MELISSA M. SHEW A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Philosophy and the Graduate School ofthe University ofOregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2008 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation of Approval and Acceptance of Dissertation prepared by: Melissa Shew Title: "The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought" This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree in the Department ofPhilosophy by: Peter Warnek, Chairperson, Philosophy John Lysaker, Member, Philosophy Ted Toadvine, Member, Philosophy James Crosswhite, Outside Member, English and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University of Oregon. September 6, 2008 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. 111 An Abstract of the Dissertation of Melissa M. Shew for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy to be taken September 2008 Title: THE PHENOMENON OF CHANCE IN ANCIENT GREEK THOUGHT Approved: Dr. Peter Warnek This dissertation engages three facets of Greek philosophy: 1) the phenomenon of tyche (chance, fortune, happening, or luck) in Aristotle's Physics, Nicomachean Ethics, and Poetics; 2) how tyche infonns Socrates' own philosophical practice in the Platonic dialogues; and 3) how engaging tyche in these Greek texts challenges established interpretations of Greek thought in contemporary scholarship and discussion. I argue that the complex status of tyche in Aristotle's texts, when combined with its appearance in the Platonic dialogues and the framework of Greek myth and poetry (poiesis), underscores the seriousness with which the Greeks consider the role of chance in human life.
  • La Tetrapharmakos, Formule Authentique Ou Résumé Simpliste De L’Éthique Épicurienne ? Julie Giovacchini

    La Tetrapharmakos, Formule Authentique Ou Résumé Simpliste De L’Éthique Épicurienne ? Julie Giovacchini

    La tetrapharmakos, formule authentique ou résumé simpliste de l’éthique épicurienne ? Julie Giovacchini To cite this version: Julie Giovacchini. La tetrapharmakos, formule authentique ou résumé simpliste de l’éthique épicuri- enne ? : Quelques éléments sur le statut des abrégés et des florilèges dans la pédagogie du Jardin. Philosophie antique - problèmes, renaissances, usages , Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 2019, pp.29-56. hal-02315259 HAL Id: hal-02315259 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02315259 Submitted on 14 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. LA TETRAPHARMAKOS FORMULE AUTHENTIQUE OU RESUMÉ SIMPLISTE DE L’ÉTHIQUE ÉPICURIENNE ? Quelques éléments sur le statut des abrégés et des florilèges dans la pédagogie du Jardin Julie GIOVACCHINI CNRS UMR8230 Centre Jean Pépin RESUME. L’objet de cet article est d’analyser la version formulaire la plus connue de l’éthique épicurienne, souvent appelée dans la littérature critique tetrapharmakos ou quadruple remède. On tentera de trancher la question de l’authenticité de cette formule, et d’en déduire certains éléments concernant la pédagogie éthique épicurienne et le rôle qu’y jouent abrégés et florilèges. SUMMARY. The paper aims at analysing the best known formula of Epicurean ethics, often called in the secondary literature the tetrapharmakos (quadruple medicine).
  • 21-44 Epicurus' Second Remedy: “Death Is Nothing To

    21-44 Epicurus' Second Remedy: “Death Is Nothing To

    http://akroterion.journals.ac.za http://akroterion.journals.ac.za EPICURUS’ SECOND REMEDY: “DEATH IS NOTHING TO US” P E Bjarnason (University of Stellenbosch) Cowards die many times before their deaths; The valiant never taste of death but once. Of all the wonders that I yet have heard, It seems to me most strange that men should fear; Seeing that death, a necessary end, Will come when it will come. (Shakespeare, Julius Caesar II, ii, 32-37) That death is complete extinction is the message forcefully driven home by the Epicurean analysis of the soul as a temporary amalgam of atomic particles . The moral corollary, that you should not let the fear of death ruin your life, is a cardinal tenet of Epicurean ethics. (Long and Sedley 1987:153) The second remedy of the tetrapharmakos concerns the second of the two great fears to which man is subject: death. Frischer (1982:208) observes that the Epicureans regarded death as “more damaging to peace of mind than all other fears except fear of the gods”. The Epicurean position is stated clearly in the surviving writings of the Master, and it is necessary to go directly to the ipsissima verba as our starting point, and then to augment our understanding of Epicurus’ words with further passages from later Epicureans and other philosophers. In these writings we shall see that death, as the material dissolution of body and soul, is a process at once natural, inevitable, and final. 1. Primary Sources: Epicurus on Body, Soul, and Death The first thing which Epicurus strove to establish in his psychological theory was the complete and permanent loss of consciousness at death.
  • Philosophical Vignettes at Lucretius' De Rerum Natura 2.1-13

    Philosophical Vignettes at Lucretius' De Rerum Natura 2.1-13

    Philosophical Vignettes at Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura 2.1-13 In a forthcoming article, Chris Eckerman offers a new interpretation of DRN 2.7-8, arguing that tenere…templa serena refers to practicing ataraxia. I am in agreement with Eckerman’s suggestion. The purpose of this talk is to consider interpretive ramifications, left unaddressed, deriving from his philological argument. I argue that Lucretius begins his proem by developing vignettes around cornerstone concepts in the Epicurean ethical doctrine. I suggest that Lucretius develops an argumentative tricolon, with two vignettes emphasizing aponia (1-2, 5-6) and one vignette emphasizing ataraxia (7-13). Scholars have already recognized that, in the proem, Lucretius develops the idea that the Epicurean life offers security (asphaleia) (cf. Konstan 2008, 32), but, since we have not recognized, until recently, that the third member of the tricolon references ataraxia, we have not recognized that Lucretius develops a tricolon dedicated specifically to reflection on aponia in the first two limbs and on ataraxia in the third. That is to say, the proem does not focus on security generally but on the security that may be had in aponia and ataraxia specifically. The first two lines provide Lucretius’ first vignette on aponia. Suave, mari magno turbantibus aequora ventis, e terra magnum alterius spectare laborem; Looking upon the great labor of another person from land when winds are upsetting the calm on the great sea is pleasant. The term laborem (2) is programmatic, for, as M. Gale (2013, 33) has shown, Lucretius uses labor and laborare to reference ‘the futile struggles of the non-Epicurean.’ Accordingly, readers, as they become familiar both with Epicurean doctrine and with Lucretius’ language, infer that the man is at sea for commercial reasons, pursuing the affluence that may result therefrom (cf.
  • Lucrèce Au Féminin Au Dix-Huitième Siècle La Femme Épicurienne Et Le Discours Sur Le Bonheur D’Émilie Du Châtelet

    Lucrèce Au Féminin Au Dix-Huitième Siècle La Femme Épicurienne Et Le Discours Sur Le Bonheur D’Émilie Du Châtelet

    Lucrèce au féminin au dix-huitième siècle La femme épicurienne et le Discours sur le bonheur d’Émilie du Châtelet Natania Meeker University of Southern California Traduit de l’américain par Katy Le Bris La féminité lucrétienne « Dans un certain sens, nous sommes tous épicuriens à présent » écrit Catherine Wilson dans son introduction à Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity 1. Stephen Greenblatt fait une observation similaire dans Quattrocento, où il raconte l’histoire de la redécouverte du poème De rerum natura par le scriptor et chasseur de livres Poggio Bracciolini. Bracciolini (dit le Pogge), en mettant au jour l’œuvre de Lucrèce, enterrée dans un monastère allemand, s’est fait « le maïeuticien de la modernité » d’après Greenblatt 2. Le lecteur peut voir, dans cette expression évoquant un Lucrèce dont nous sommes tous les enfants, un nouvel écho de l’affirmation célèbre de Denis Diderot dans l’article « épicu- réisme ou épicurisme » de l’Encyclopédie, selon laquelle « on se fait stoïcien mais on naît épicurien » 3. Des épicuriens, voilà ce que nous, modernes, sommes destinés à être. Et, pour Diderot, c’est pendant le siècle des Lumières que nous nous sommes pleinement éveillés à nos origines épicuriennes. 1 Catherine Wilson, Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 3. 2 Stephen Greenblatt, Quattrocento, trad. Cécile Arnaud, Paris, Flammarion, 2015, p. 21. En anglais dans la version originale, « maïeuticien » devient “mid-wife” (sage-femme). 3 Denis Diderot, « épicuréisme ou épicurisme » dans Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, etc., éd. Denis Diderot et Jean le Rond d’Alembert, University of Chicago : ARTFL Encyclopédie Project (Autumn 2017 Edition), Robert Morrissey and Glenn Roe (eds), http://encyclopedie.uchicago.edu/, tome V, p.