Submission Into the Senate Inquiry
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
"A world in which government cannot be bothered to investigate potential illegal medical assault on its citizens, in which those with no authority feel free to make decisions which are blatantly against the law and to carry out serious and irreversible procedures on those with little or no capacity to give or withhold consent, is a world in which people with disabilities can have no 1 certainty or confidence about their human being or their future Dedicated to Diane Wellfare 1951-2008 –who believed in me Irene Kelly – my mother 1940 – 1992 whom I could never disclosed what was done to in the Aryan Racial experiment under Commonwealth Law and practice - in the name of “being adopted” Submission into the Senate Inquiry - Commonwealth contribution to former forced adoption policies and practices Michael O’Meara - AN ADOPTEES RESPONSE The removal & sterilization program of the Illegitimates in the 1960’s and 1970’s associated with the Colonies Racial decay policy in published historical aspects ―As treatment doses and frequency were varied, he was effectively castrated; with his testes so damaged that puberty was then delayed to such an extent that he was treated with anabolic steroids to induce puberty‖ Another Anne Hamilton –Byrne experience In Malcolm Turnbull‘s response to the FA Apology, you were ―abandoned and betrayed". You were from "good white stock" (not correct, it was ―Eugenics" – (Racial Hygiene cleansing) ―You‘re our mothers‘ worst nightmare‖. Elizabeth Edwards, Origins Victoria. - Stolen from my mother and experimented in Aryanism The “Aryan Experiment” in past forced adoption practices and by infusing Master Glands to produce a Master Race similar to the Hitler Régime with infusion. Social control of the illegitimate bastard child with family history of epilepsy, short stature, nervousness, feeble mindedness and physical disabilities Never to forget the day as a 10 year old (1972) when I awoke from an induced coma and the doctor stated to my mother “his testicles are missing”. The reply - “does that matter?” …”your treatment was not to encourage growth, nor to induce puberty”. Dr Helena Teede 2 I, Michael Anthony O‘Meara am a legitimized citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia resident in the State of Victoria As a citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia I have an inalienable right to protection under the Australian Constitution and the Common Law of this country As an Australian citizen, the Commonwealth affords me protection from the unlawful and harmful actions that threaten my right to life, liberty and justice from those who would deny me these rights, within and without, the borders of Australia. I am afforded protection under WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 2001 (Vic) (...) 19th day of March 2011 Respect needs to be restored beginning with unblocking names in an inquiry that endeavors to honestly establish truth. Forced adoption, forced eugenics, forced castration and forced sterilization. Section 1.01 Preamble I am not telling this story for revenge or because it is sensational. I am telling it because it is essential in the process of me growing away from my past even though the damage is irreparable. A past so bizarre, it‘s almost incomprehensible. This is a story that I think needs to be told. It is in part also, to come to terms with the reality that this, like it or not, it‘s my past – and as bazar as it was, it created me into the person I am today – a survivor of childhood torture1 bestowed upon me by the Commonwealth and it‘s agencies in a eugenics program for The Aryan Race. In short, a 'Caucasian' in this context comes to be the White Man ―par excellence‖, so that this term has taken on something of the meaning which in Hitler's time attached to 'Aryan.'2 Abducted at birth, my story is in part the same as what the Anne Hamilton-Byrne‘s kids endured - but to a degree, even more bizarre. Most of those kids have suicided, and although I have the ―scar of remembrance‖ still to deal with, I survived Aryanism, torture and Nazism. 3 I had been raised as a 'scientific experiment' and to believe I was not like everyone else. But I had stayed quiet….until now. Margaret Sanger published "The Birth Control Review." In that magazine she openly supported the "infanticide program" promoted by Nazi Germany in the 1930s, and publicly championed Adolf Hitler's goal of Aryan white supremacy. In the years prior to World War II Margaret Sanger commissioned Ernst Rudin, a member of the Nazi Party, and director of the dreaded German Medical Experimentation Programs, to serve as an advisor to her organization. In his excellent book "Killer Angel," George Grant chronicles the life and writings of Margaret Sanger, and painstakingly documents Sanger's plans for the genetic engineering of the human race. George Grant noted that in the 1920s Margaret Sanger wrote "The Pivot of Civilization" in which she called for: "The 'elimination of 'human weeds,' for the 'cessation of charity' because it prolonged the lives of the unfit, for the segregation of 'morons, misfits, and the maladjusted,' and for the sterilization of genetically inferior races."3 It is only through a national inquiry that Australians will learn of the nationwide extent of the crimes acknowledged as the ―kidnapping" as described by Family Court Justice Richard Chisholm in evidence he gave at the NSW Parliamentary Inquiry into past adoption practices in 19994. Now, a story of what happens to a kidnapped child, can be told, retold and never forgotten, for we weren‘t from ―good white stock‖ at all, – we had endured a Racial Hygiene Program. Adoption was targeted, not to the bad, nor the mad, but ―upon the sad‖ – the sadness of the unacceptable situations endured out of wedlock. If they didn‘t break your mind, then they would break your body. We had been denied the most basic human right….mother and child, that is the true scenario of ―as if born to them‖ Under the Adoption of Children Act 1958 (Vic) and The Health Act 1958 (Cth) I was abducted and presumed a ―foundling‖ (nobody‘s child) even though I was still in the legal custody of my mother, the woman whom gave me life and to endure unlawful medical procedures conducted without my mothers‘ consent. My mother was denied her parental and lawful rights to her first born child. I was not fillus nullus. My mother was a married woman whilst I lay lingering in a foundling home, with the ―view of adoption‖5. I was a child of my mother under the Adoption of Children Act 1958, and I was abducted6. The act of a pillow stuffed over her face during childbirth along with no contact and with no consent for removal - is abduction, an act of intent7 resulting in abducting. The report to the Commonwealth enacting a change in the 1964 Act confirms the Commonwealth was aware 4 of abductions under the 1958 Act, eliminating my mothers‘ consent and within a further Act, the Status of Children Act 1974 (retrospective), confirms I was not illegitimate. The 1964 Act revised procedures so babies couldn‘t be abducted. Our ―illegitimacy‖ records need to be changed to reflect the correct legal status of the time – I was not illegitimate as labelled. I was abducted in the Royal Women‘s Hospital Carlton, a registered institution of the Commonwealth, by registered medical practitioners before the placenta was expelled never to see my mother, never to be held by my mother and never to be seen, held or nurtured by my mother. I had been abducted8 six days before the consent was ―questionably‖ signed, in circumstances which appear unlawful – the same consent that breaches common law and legislative procedures. The evidence is recorded. I had already been alerted to the testimony of my own mother when I met her for the first time in 28 years in the late 1980‘s. – The abduction of her baby boy – me. But when I met her I was no longer a baby boy, I had been created a ―Eunuch‖ – a program funded by the Commonwealth upon ―poor orphaned boys‖ in the 1970‘s. I am not a part of a stolen generation, or a white stolen generation, but an abducted9 generation – a generation in the ―social engineering of eugenics‖ of Aryanism, for Church and State. A eunuch is a castrated man, usually one castrated early enough to have major hormonal consequences. The term usually refers to those castrated (without their consent) in order to perform a specific social function, as was historically common in many societies, including Australia. What my mother told me was astonishing – totally inhumane and unbelievable. No woman could have been treated like that – was my initial thought, back in 1989. Firstly, I didn‘t believe her, secondly, I thought she was making up a story to negate the way I felt about being ―rejected‖ by her, but as time went on, I heard the same stories from other mothers, and then I felt guilty for not believing in my own mother. The story of my birth horrified me – torn out by forceps, the scar still evident on my temple, whisked away, never to be seen for nearly 30 years. How could they manipulate these human rights atrocities? But there was no way I would tell my mother what was done to me. I couldn‘t tell her that there would be no grandchildren for her, for what the Commonwealth had done to me. Our genes were never to be passed on. 5 She died in 1992 never know her baby boy was tortured.