DOCSLIB.ORG

PUBLIC SUMMARY RECERTIFICATION AUDIT on SELANGOR FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT for FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION Certificate Number

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PUBLIC SUMMARY RECERTIFICATION AUDIT on SELANGOR FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT for FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION Certificate Number PUBLIC SUMMARY RECERTIFICATION AUDIT ON SELANGOR FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION Certificate Number: FMC 0007 Date of First Certification: 1 Sept 2010 Audit Date: 4th March - 8th March 2019 Date of Public Summary: 11 Jun 2019 Certification Body: SIRIM QAS International Sdn. Bhd. Block 4, SIRIM Complex No. 1, Persiaran Dato’ Menteri Section 2, 40700 Shah Alam Selangor MALAYSIA Tel : 60-3-5544 6400/5544 6448 Fax : 60-3 5544 6763 Website: www.sirim-qas.com.my SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-27a Issue 1 Rev 0 Page 1 of 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2. INTRODUCTION 4 2.1 Name of Selangor FMU 4 2.2 Contact Person and Address 4 2.3 General Background on the Selangor FMU 4 2.4 Date First Certified 4 2.5 Location of the FMU 4 2.6 Forest Management System 5 2.7 Annual Allowable Cut/ Annual Harvest Under the Forest Management Plan 5 2.8 Environmental and Socioeconomic Context 5 3 AUDIT PROCESS 5 3.1 Audit Dates 5 3.2 Audit Team 5 3.3 Standard Used 5 3.4 Stakeholder Consultations 5 3.5 Audit Process 6 4. SUMMARY OF AUDIT FINDINGS 6 Attachments 1 Map of Selangor FMU 13 2 Details of the Auditors and their Qualification 14 3 Recertification Audit Plan 17 5 Recertification Audit Findings (2019) and Corrective Action Taken 20 6 Verification on Previous Surveillance 2 (2017) Audit Findings and Corrective Action Taken 22 SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-27a Issue 1 Rev 0 Page 2 of 22 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This recertification audit on the Selangor Forest Management Unit (hereafter referred as the Selangor FMU) was conducted on 4th -8th March 2019 to assess the continued compliance of the overall forest management system of the Selangor FMU against the requirements of the Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification (Natural Forest) [MC&I(Natural Forest)] using the verifiers stipulated for Peninsular Malaysia. The scope of this recertification audit was limited to the forest management system and practices on the Permanent Reserved Forest (PRF) within the Selangor FMU. This recertification audit was conducted by a 3-member team comprising Hj Roslee Jamaludin, (Lead Auditor), Dr. Mohd Nazre Saleh@Japri (Auditor) and Puteri Arlydia Abdul (Auditor). Based on the findings of this recertification audit, it was found that Selangor FMU had continued to comply with the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest). This recertification audit had resulted in the issuance of 4 (four) Observation for Improvements (OFIs) were raised. This public summary contains the general information on the Selangor FMU, the findings of the recertification audit, (OFIs) raised as well as the decision on the continued certification of the FMU. SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-27a Issue 1 Rev 0 Page 3 of 22 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Name of FMU Selangor Forest Management Unit 2.2 Contact Person and Address Name : Dr. Mohd Puat bin Dahalan Designation : Director Address : Tingkat 3, Podium Utara, Bangunan Sultan Salahudin Abdul Aziz Shah, 40650 Shah Alam, Selangor Phone # : 03 5544 7490 Fax # : 03 5510 2358 2.3 General Background on the Selangor FMU The Selangor FMU is managed by the Selangor State Forestry Department (SSFD). The SSFD is committed in the management of the FMU on a sustainable basis. The administration of the FMU is divided into three (3) forest districts namely the Selangor Tengah, Pantai Klang Forest District, and Hulu Selangor Forest Districts. Selangor FMU is located within coordinates Lat 30 51’ 55’’ N; Long 1000 45’ 55’’E (Top left) and Lat 20 35’ 2’’ N; 1020 9’ 5’’E (Bottom right). The Selangor FMU managed by the Selangor State Forestry Department (SSFD) comprised of 250,128 hectares of PRF of the state’s total land area of 792,534 hectares. The PRF consists mainly of 148,240 of Inland Forest, 82,890 ha of Peat Swamp Forest and small patch (18,998 ha) of Mangrove Forest. The Inland Forest within the PRF also includes 11,381 ha of Forest Plantation which is planted mainly with Acacia mangium, of which 9,543 ha are leased to the Perbadanan Kemajuan Pertanian Selangor (PKPS) for harvesting and replanting. The remaining 1,838 ha are managed by the SSFD. However, the forest plantation area was excluded from the total PRF area of 250,128 ha, hence, the total area certified in the Selangor FMU was only 238,747 ha. A Forest Management Plan (FMP) covering the period from 2011 to 2020 had been written and presented during the audit. The mid-term review was completed on December 2015 covering the period from 2011 to 2015 was also presented. The Selangor FMU continues to be managed on the Sustainable Yield Management (SYM) basis under a Selective Management System (SMS) on a 30-year rotation period. For the Tenth Malaysia Plan, the Annual Allowable Cut (AAC) for the FMU had been set at 982 ha. However, the Selangor State Government has placed a moratorium of no logging operation for a period of 25 years since 2010, as stated in “Ucapan Budget Dewan Undangan Negeri Selangor 2010, Item 122”. Therefore, no ongoing harvesting activities conducted until year 2035. A map of the FMU showing the significant features of the forest is attached in Attachment 1. 2.4 Date First Certified 1th September 2010 2.5 Location of the FMU Selangor FMU is located within coordinates Lat 30 51’ 55’’ N; Long 1000 45’ 55’’E (Top left) and Lat 20 35’ 2’’ N; 1020 9’ 5’’E (Bottom right). SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-27a Issue 1 Rev 0 Page 4 of 22 2.6 Forest Management System The FMU had followed the principles of sustainable forest management (SFM) and the requirements of the Licence Agreement of the State government. A Forest Management Plan (FMP) (2011) to (2020) was presented during this audit. 2.7 Annual Allowable Cut/Annual Harvest under the Forest Management Plan For the Tenth Malaysia Plan, the Annual Allowable Cut (AAC) for the FMU had been set at 982 ha. However, the Selangor State Government has placed a moratorium of no logging operation for a period of 25 years since 2010, as stated in “Ucapan Budget Dewan Undangan Negeri Selangor 2010, Item 122”. Therefore, no ongoing harvesting activities conducted until year 2035. 2.8 Environmental and Socioeconomic Context The Macro Environmental Impact Assessment (MEIA) for Selangor FMU that had been done in 2011 was available during the audit, and still applicable to be used. In addition, a total of eight (8) quarries that was given licence to operate within the FMU, and each of the quarry licence has their own EIA report. Site verification on the two HCVF areas namely Compt. 5, Semangko PFR (22 ha) – the presence of population Meranti Bukit ((Shorea platyclados) in Selangor, Compt. 14, Kanching PFR (6.25 ha) – the presence of critically endangered (CR) species of Merawan Kanching (Hopea subulata), and VJR of Compt. 13, Pulau Klang confirmed that the areas were protected, monitored, maintained and managed by SSFD. The Orang Asli or local communities did not have any right of ownership over land in the PRF. However the Orang Asli were allowed under the Act to freely access the forest and collect forest resources for their own consumption. The Selangor FMU recognized and supported these legal rights of the Orang Asli. There was no case reported of forest operations carried out by the SSFD/logging contractors in aboriginal reserves or areas. Neither was any civil court case pertaining to legal or customary tenure or use rights within the PRF recorded. 3. AUDIT PROCESS 3.1 Audit Dates 4th March - 8th March 2019 3.2 Audit Team 1. Hj.Roslee Jamaludin ( Lead Auditor) 2. Dr.Mohd.Nazre Saleh @ Japri 3. Puteri Arlydia Abdul The details on the experiences and qualifications of the audit team members are as in Attachment 2. 3.3 Standard Used Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification (Natural Forest)[MC&I(Natural Forest)] using the verifiers stipulated for Peninsular Malaysia. 3.4 Stakeholder Consultations A stakeholder consultation was conducted in February 2019 for a period of one month. However, there is no comment received from the stakeholders. SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-27a Issue 1 Rev 0 Page 5 of 22 3.5 Audit Process The audit was conducted primarily to evaluate the level of continued compliance of the Selangor FMU’s current documentation and field practices in forest management with the detailed of the standard of performances (SOPs) listed in the MC&I(Natural Forest), using the verifiers stipulated for Peninsular Malaysia. For each Indicator, the auditors had conducted either a documentation review, consultation with the relevant personnel of the FMU, local community or stakeholders or field audit or a combination of these methods. Depending on the compliance with the verifiers for a particular indicator, the auditors then decided on the degree of the FMU’s overall compliance with the indicator and decided whether or not to issue a major or minor NCR or an OFI which is defined as follows: (i) a major NCR is a non-compliance with the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest); (ii) a minor NCR is a deviation or a lapse in complying with the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest); and (iii) an OFI is a situation where the auditor has noted an area of concern on the capability of the forest management system to achieve conformance to the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest) but without sufficient objective evidence to support a non-conformance. The coverage of this recertification audit is as shown in the recertification Audit Plan in Attachment 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adventure Tourism in Selangor: Explore, Experience and Enjoy!
    ADVENTURE TOURISM IN SELANGOR: EXPLORE, EXPERIENCE AND ENJOY! By Nurul Azlyna (CIFP,Bach. Of Acc (Hons), CMI) LET’S HIT THE ROAD Millions of people travel across the world every year and thus, making the tourism industry as a key role in the global economy. According to World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC), the industry accounted for 10.4% of global GDP and 319 million jobs, or 10% of total employment in 2018. Travellers travel with different purposes where some people travel for leisure or business while some travel due to specific interest such as medical or religion. Given the different purposes, tourism industry has been classified into various types to cater to the needs and preferences of all types of tourists. The following are the categories of tourism1: a. Leisure Under this purpose, travellers simply want to enjoy new experience of a destination and devoting their holiday to rest and relaxation. These tourists prefer to stay in some quiet and relaxed destination preferably at a hill resort, beach resort or island resort. b. Business The travellers’ main motive for travel is for work purpose such as attending a business meeting, conferences, conventions selling products, meeting clients. Business tourism is popularly known as MICE (Meetings, incentives, conferences, and exhibitions) tourism. c. Special Interest Interestingly, some people travel for special reasons such as religions, medical, education, hobbies and cultural. Under medical tourism for example, travellers go to places such as recommended specialist centre seeking for medical treatment. Meanwhile, the adventurous groups usually travel to spots that are popular for adventure activities such as bungee jumping or whale- 1 National Institute of Open Schooling watch.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Codes Countries of the World & Unique Locations
    BELLCORE PRACTICE BR 751-401-180 ISSUE 16, FEBRUARY 1999 COMMON LANGUAGE® Geographical Codes Countries of the World & Unique Locations BELLCORE PROPRIETARY - INTERNAL USE ONLY This document contains proprietary information that shall be distributed, routed or made available only within Bellcore, except with written permission of Bellcore. LICENSED MATERIAL - PROPERTY OF BELLCORE Possession and/or use of this material is subject to the provisions of a written license agreement with Bellcore. Geographical Codes Countries of the World & Unique Locations BR 751-401-180 Copyright Page Issue 16, February 1999 Prepared for Bellcore by: R. Keller For further information, please contact: R. Keller (732) 699-5330 To obtain copies of this document, Regional Company/BCC personnel should contact their company’s document coordinator; Bellcore personnel should call (732) 699-5802. Copyright 1999 Bellcore. All rights reserved. Project funding year: 1999. BELLCORE PROPRIETARY - INTERNAL USE ONLY See proprietary restrictions on title page. ii LICENSED MATERIAL - PROPERTY OF BELLCORE BR 751-401-180 Geographical Codes Countries of the World & Unique Locations Issue 16, February 1999 Trademark Acknowledgements Trademark Acknowledgements COMMON LANGUAGE is a registered trademark and CLLI is a trademark of Bellcore. BELLCORE PROPRIETARY - INTERNAL USE ONLY See proprietary restrictions on title page. LICENSED MATERIAL - PROPERTY OF BELLCORE iii Geographical Codes Countries of the World & Unique Locations BR 751-401-180 Trademark Acknowledgements Issue 16, February 1999 BELLCORE PROPRIETARY - INTERNAL USE ONLY See proprietary restrictions on title page. iv LICENSED MATERIAL - PROPERTY OF BELLCORE BR 751-401-180 Geographical Codes Countries of the World & Unique Locations Issue 16, February 1999 Table of Contents COMMON LANGUAGE Geographic Codes Countries of the World & Unique Locations Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 1 Introduction As a Chinese Buddhist in Malaysia, I Have Been
    Chapter 1 Introduction As a Chinese Buddhist in Malaysia, I have been unconsciously entangled in a historical process of the making of modern Buddhism. There was a Chinese temple beside my house in Penang, Malaysia. The main deity was likely a deified imperial court officer, though no historical record documented his origin. A mosque serenely resided along the main street approximately 50 meters from my house. At the end of the street was a Hindu temple decorated with colorful statues. Less than five minutes’ walk from my house was a Buddhist association in a two-storey terrace. During my childhood, the Chinese temple was a playground. My friends and I respected the deities worshipped there but sometimes innocently stole sweets and fruits donated by worshippers as offerings. Each year, three major religious events were organized by the temple committee: the end of the first lunar month marked the spring celebration of a deity in the temple; the seventh lunar month was the Hungry Ghost Festival; and the eighth month honored, She Fu Da Ren, the temple deity’s birthday. The temple was busy throughout the year. Neighbors gathered there to chat about national politics and local gossip. The traditional Chinese temple was thus deeply rooted in the community. In terms of religious intimacy with different nearby temples, the Chinese temple ranked first, followed by the Hindu temple and finally, the mosque, which had a psychological distant demarcated by racial boundaries. I accompanied my mother several times to the Hindu temple. Once, I asked her why she prayed to a Hindu deity.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Klang Prelims
    Port Klang Initial Risk Assessment Port Klang Integrated Coastal Management National Demonstration Project Selangor Waters Management Authority (Lembaga Urus Air Selangor or LUAS) Ahah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia Port Klang Initial Risk Assessment Port Klang Integrated Coastal Management National Demonstration Project GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Building Partnerships in Environmental Selangor Waters Management Authority Management for the Seas of East Asia (Lembaga Urus Air Selangor or LUAS) Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia i PORT KLANG INITIAL RISK ASSESSMENT March 2005 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes or to provide wider dissemination for public response, provided prior written permission is obtained from the Regional Programme Director, acknowledgment of the source is made and no commercial usage or sale of the material occurs. PEMSEA would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale, any commercial purpose or any purpose other than those given above without a written agreement between PEMSEA and the requesting party. Published by the GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Building Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) and the Port Klang Integrated Coastal Management National Demonstration Project, Selangor Waters Management Authority (LUAS), Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Printed in Quezon City, Philippines PEMSEA and Port Klang ICM National Demonstation Project. 2005. Port Klang Initial Risk Assessment. PEMSEA Technical Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Urban Development in Klang Valley Region, Malaysia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository ASSESSMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND LANDUSE CHANGES’ IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT: A CASE STUDY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN KLANG VALLEY REGION, MALAYSIA Ahris Yaakup Mansor Ibrahim Susilawati Sulaiman Zulherman M.Sosi Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Wilayah Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81300 Skudai, Johor, malaysia Email: [email protected] Abstract The increasing demand for housing, employment opportunities, institutions and other urban facilities and services due to migration of rural and town’s dwellers to urban centres leading to drastic changes of urban land covers is believed to be the main factor contributing to the degradation of environmental qualities, namely the increase in temperature, geohazard occurrences, as well as noise, air and water pollution in urban areas. Analyses using various GIS functions were carried out to illustrate the relationship between urban development as well as land use changes and the degradation of environmental qualities in Klang Valley Region. This paper will look into the impact imposed by urban development and land use change upon the trend of environmental quality described earlier. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The framework for urban development and management can be viewed as a complex system, changes in one area e.g intensification of use or changes in management practice will often lead to change and pressure elsewhere. As such, the need to consider environmental issues in planning and policy-making is of greater concern today considering the impact imposed by development. Environmental impact due to development and urban growth has since act as a check and balance in achieving the so called ‘sustainable development’.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Environmental Issues Related to Capital Dredging Works at Port Klang, Malaysia
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES RELATED TO CAPITAL DREDGING WORKS AT PORT KLANG, MALAYSIA Rajoo Addakann1 ABSTRACT Port Klang is Malaysia’s leading port with two main navigational entrances / exits. The Northern Pulau Angsa Approach is via the dredged North Channel, 153 meters wide with maintained declared depth of 11.3 meters below Chart Datum (m CD). The Southern approach lies adjacent to the North bound lane of the Malacca Straits Traffic Separation. The South Channel has a width of 365 meters with a maintained declared depth of 15.5 m below CD. Capital dredging work is proposed in order to upgrade the North access channel to the same width and a declared depth of 365 meters & 15.5 m below CD respectively as that of the Southern approach. The capital dredging volume involved is approximately 39 million cubic meters. The mainland bordering the port is the most developed region in the country. Mangrove forests cover the undeveloped coastal zones within and at areas bordering the port. Inter tidal mud flats and natural islands off the port provide protection and environmental buffer zones. The gazetted port area and its surroundings also include numerous fishing villages, cage fish farms, cockle breeding farms and artificial reefs to promote natural fish breeding. The port area is a multi user environment with significant natural buffer zones. Hence implementation of this major capital dredging project requiring relocation of very large quantities of dredged materials will cause multi-user conflicts, socio-economic impacts as well as concerns for environmental protection. Adequate studies, investigations and planning have been carried out to identify and address all issues on environmental impacts, environmental monitoring and mitigation measures to be adopted for the successful implementation of the project with minimal impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuala Lumpur Yes / No Selangor Yes / No Putrajaya Yes / No Sri Petaling
    Kuala Lumpur Yes / No Selangor Yes / No Putrajaya Yes / No Sri Petaling Yes Alam Impian No Putrajaya No Ampang Hilir Yes Aman Perdana No Bandar Damai Perdana Yes Ambang Botanic No Bandar Menjalara Yes Ampang Yes Bandar Tasik Selatan Yes Ara Damansara Yes Bangsar Yes Balakong No Bangsar South Yes Bandar Botanic No Batu Caves Yes Bandar Bukit Raja No Brickfields Yes Bandar Bukit Tinggi No Bukit Bintang Yes Bandar Kinrara Yes Bukit Jalil Yes Bandar Puteri Klang No Bukit Ledang Yes Bandar Puteri Puchong Yes Bukit Persekutuan Yes Bandar Saujana Putra No Bukit Tunku Yes Bandar Sungai Long No Cheras Yes Bandar Sunway Yes City Centre Yes Bandar Utama Yes Country Heights Yes Bangi No Country Heights Damansara Yes Banting No Damansara Yes Batang Berjuntai No Damansara Heights Yes Batang Kali No Desa Pandan Yes Batu Arang No Desa Park City Yes Batu Caves Yes Desa Petaling Yes Beranang No Gombak Yes Bukit Antarabangsa No Jalan Ipoh Yes Bukit Jelutong No Jalan Kuching Yes Bukit Rahman Putra No Jalan Sultan Ismail Yes Bukit Rotan No Jinjang Yes Bukit Subang No Kenny Hills Yes Cheras Yes Kepong Yes Contry Heights No Keramat Yes Cyberjaya No KL City Yes Damansara Damai No KL Sentral Yes Damansara Intan Yes KLCC Yes Damansara Jaya Yes Kuchai Lama Yes Damansara Kim Yes Mid Valley City Yes Damansara Perdana Yes Mont Kiara Yes Damansara Utama Yes Old Klang Road Yes Denai Alam No OUG Yes Dengkil No Pandan Indah Yes Glenmarie No Pandan Jaya Yes Gombak No Pandan Perdana Yes Hulu Langat No Pantai Yes Hulu Selangor No Pekan Batu Yes Jenjarom No Salak Selatan
    [Show full text]
  • Staying Ahead of the Curve
    STAYING AHEAD OF THE CURVE PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018 Semenyih Water Treatment Plant WHERE ARE WE? As at December 2018, we are in the final phase of consolidating the fragmented water services companies in Selangor, Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya. When we complete the acquisition of Syarikat Pengeluar Air Sungai Selangor Sdn Bhd (SPLASH), Air Selangor will become the single holistic licensee to extract, treat and distribute water for all its customers in the aforementioned service areas. The other five water operators which Air Selangor had acquired were PNSB Water Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Puncak Niaga (M) Sdn Bhd) and Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (SYABAS) on 15 October 2015, Konsortium ABASS Sdn Bhd (ABASS) on 26 January 2016 and Konsortium Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (KASB) on 11 March 2016. Air Selangor is a special purpose vehicle (SPV) set-up by the Selangor state government to undertake the restructuring of the water industry in Selangor, and to consolidate the industry in order to provide the best possible water service experience to its customers. On 13 September 2019, following the completion of the acquisition of SPLASH on 24 April 2019, Air Selangor became the sole licensee to provide water services in Selangor, Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya. OUR WATER CYCLE Air Selangor operates and maintains the entire water services value chain from the reservoirs to distribution of treated water to consumers in Selangor, Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya. Everyday, 33 water treatment plants supply an average of 4,667 million liters of water to its 8.413 million* consumers. Dam River Balancing Reservoir Catchment Area Service Reservoir Regulated by LUAS Regulated by SPAN Operated by Air Selangor Water Treatment Plant Main Trunk Customers * Forecast by National Statistics Department Malaysia dated December 2018 3 | Air Selangor WHO WE SERVE Our 33 water treatment plants serve over 8.413 million consumers in Selangor, Putrajaya and Kuala Lumpur.
    [Show full text]
  • Jadual Pemulihan Bagi Kawasan-Kawasan Yang Mengalami Gangguan Bekalan Air Wilayah : Petaling
    JADUAL PEMULIHAN BAGI KAWASAN-KAWASAN YANG MENGALAMI GANGGUAN BEKALAN AIR WILAYAH : PETALING KAWASAN DIJANGKA PULIH KAWASAN DIJANGKA PULIH KAWASAN DIJANGKA PULIH 12.00 AM 12.00 PM 12.00 AM (18.04.2020) (18.04.2020) (19.04.2020) Sg. Plong SS1 Kg. Sg Penchala SS2 (Jalan SS2/3, SS2/26, SS2/27, SS2/28, Kg. Melayu Subang SS2/29, SS2/31, SS2/33 Sehingga SS2/44, Kg Bukit Lanjan SS2/54 Sehingga SS2/59) U6, Subang Permata SS3 Pimggiran TTDI Subang Perdana U3 SS4 Damansara Damai (PJU10/1) Saujana Damansara (PJU10/13 & PJU Bandar Pinggiran Subang U5 SS9A 10/14) Kg Orkid Seksyen 20, PJ Prima Damansara Kayangan Height Seksyen 21, PJ SS12 SS2 (Jalan SS2/2, SS2/24, SS2/72 Sehingga Monterez SS13 SS2/107, SS2/113) Pusat Perdagangan Subang Permai SS20 SS14 Subang Permai SS21 SS15 Kg Melayu Subang (Jalan PKNS, Jalan Bukit Badak, Jalan Merbau, Lorong Bunga SS22 SS16 Tanjung & Jalan Resak) Seksyen 22, PJ KGPA SS17 Seksyen 17, PJ PJU 3 Damansara SS18 Seksyen 19. PJ Kelab Menembak Subang SS19 Seksyen 11, PJ Kg Padang Tembak, Tropicana Seksyen 16, PJ Tropicana Golf & Country Club Bandar Baru Sri Petaling PJU7, Mutiara Damansara Desa Petaling PJU8, Damansara Perdana Sri Petaling Taman Tun Dr Ismail, TTDI Bukit Jalil Eastin Hotel WILAYAH : PETALING KAWASAN DIJANGKA PULIH KAWASAN DIJANGKA PULIH KAWASAN DIJANGKA PULIH 12.00 AM 12.00 PM 12.00 AM (18.04.2020) (18.04.2020) (19.04.2020) Bukit Jalil Resort Phileo Damansara, KL Taman Esplanad Paradigm Mall (Kolam Air Ara Damansara) PJU 1A, Ara Taman OUG Damansara Bukit OUG Icon City Taman Perindustrian OUG SS2 (Jalan
    [Show full text]
  • Klang Valley Malaysia
    KLANG VALLEY MALAYSIA Visual Arts Map ABOUT THIS MAP This Visual Arts Map attempts ECOSYSTEM MAPPING Under its strategic pillar to to chart various components, OVERVIEW ‘Empower the Communities’ through participants and dynamics of the increasing opportunities for larger visual arts ecosystem in Malaysian artists and cultural Malaysia. It provides a listing of professionals, CENDANA has organisations offering funding and worked with My Performing Arts support for visual arts, information Agency, RogueArt and Dr. Adil resources and artist associations, Johan of the Institute of Ethnic as well as a map and directory of Studies to publish Ecosystem Klang Valley-based visual arts Mapping Guides that provide platforms, tertiary institutions listings of arts organisations, offering visual arts programmes venues, institutions, networks and specialist research libraries. and platforms as well as local and international funding resources Users should note that art market for different cultural sectors. platforms (e.g., auctions, art fairs, private galleries with exhibition The Ecosystem Mapping effort programming and representing is part of a long-term series of artists, as well as showroom information guides initiated by galleries that operate on walk- CENDANA for public and private in sales) are differentiated from stakeholders, practitioners, general platforms for the visual policymakers, researchers, arts (e.g., public and corporate artists and cultural workers galleries, artist-run spaces, venues encompassing various artistic for hire) to indicate the different and cultural disciplines. economies and audiences that coexist and sometimes cross over in the ecosystem. It should also be noted that most funding bodies and certain general platforms are broad in their reach, with the visual arts being just one of various arts disciplines they support.
    [Show full text]
  • Rate and Service Guide Daily Rates Malaysia Effective July 11, 2021 1
    2021 UPS® Domestic Rate and Service Guide Daily Rates Malaysia Effective July 11, 2021 1 Area of Service Area of Service West Malaysia – Area of Service within Peninsular FEDERAL TERRITORY Sungai Rambai Temangan Intan Banting Kuala Lumpur Sungai Udang Tanah Merah Jeram Batang Berjuntai Labuan Tanjong Kling Tumpat Kampar Batang Kali Putrajaya Kampong Gajah Batu 9 Cheras NEGERI SEMBILAN PAHANG Kampong Kepayang Batu Arang JOHOR Seremban Kuantan Kamunting Batu Caves Johor Bahru Bahau Bandar Pusat Jengka Kuala Kangsar Beranang = Ayer Hitam Bandar Baru Serting Benta Kuala Kurau Behrang Bakri Batu Kikir Bentong Kuala Sepetang Bukit Rotan Batu Anam Gemas Cameron Highlands Lahat Cyberjaya Batu Pahat Gemencheh Genting Highlands Lambor Kanan Dengkil Bekok Johol Jerantut Langkap Hulu Langat Benut Juasseh Karak Lumut Jenjarom Bukit Gambir Kuala Pilah Kuala Lipis Maliam Nawar Jeram Bukit Pasir Labu Kuala Rompin Mamban Diawan Kajang Chaah Lenggang Lanchang Manong Kapar Endau Linggi Maran Matang Kerling Gelang Patah Mantin Mentakab Menglembu Klang Gerisik Nilai Pekan Padang Rengas KLIA Jementah Pedas Raub Pangkor Kota Kemuning Kahang Port Dickson Tanah Rata Pantai Remis Kuala Kubu Bahru Kg Kenangan Tun Dr Ismail Rembau Temerloh Parit Kuala Selangor Kluang Rompin Parit Buntar Pelabuhan Klang Kota Tinggi Seri Menanti PENANG Pengkalan Hulu Petaling Jaya Kukup Siliau Pulau Pinang Sauk Puchong Kulai Titi Ayer Itam Selama Pulau Carey Labis Balik Pulau Selekoh Pulau Indah Layang-Layang KEDAH Batu Ferringghi Seri Manjong Pulau Ketam Masai Alor Setar Batu Maung
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Sea Level Rise Due to Climate Change : Case Study of Klang and Kuala Langat Districts
    International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 1, February 2018 Impact of Sea Level Rise Due to Climate Change : Case Study of Klang and Kuala Langat Districts M. F. Mohamad, M. R. Abd Hamid, N. A. Awang, A. Mohd Shah, and A. F. Hamzah [3]. Based upon analyses of the tidal gauge records, Church et Abstract— Global climate change is predicted to cause an al. [4] determined a global mean SLR of 1.8 ± 0.3 mm/yr increase in sea level rise and the frequency and size of storms during the 1950-2000 period, and Church and White [5] and storm surge. This will contribute further to the shoreline determined a mean SLR of 1.7 ± 0.3 mm/yr for the 20th erosion; flood damage, inundation of land, saltwater intrusion century. Considering these results and allowing for the into the freshwater lens aquifer, among others. The completion gradually increasing trend in recent years by satellite altimetry of sea level rise study in Malaysia by National Hydraulic Research Institute of Malaysia (NAHRIM) and Ministry of observations, Bindoff et al. [6] assess the global mean SLR Natural Resources and Environment (NRE), several subsequent rate to be 1.8 ± 0.5 mm/yr for the 1961-2003 period, and 1.7 ± studies were proposed. One of the subsequent studies is a study 0.5 mm/yr for the 20th century. In context of Malaysian on the sea level rise impact to the planning and development of region, the rate of SLR varies throughout the whole coast of the national coastal zones specifically at Klang and Kuala Malaysia with an average between 2.73 – 7.0 mm/yr based on Langat districts.
    [Show full text]