DOCSLIB.ORG

The Oxford Journals Collection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Oxford Journals Collection The Oxford Journals Collection 275 high-quality journals Access to content back to 1996 academic.oup.com/journals/collection Medicine | Life Sciences | Humanities | Social Sciences Mathematics & Physical Sciences | Law 2 | OXFORD JOURNALS The Oxford Journals Collection published in Over partnership with many of the world’s most 70% influential scholarly and professional societies 275 high-quality SOCIAL journals SCIENCES HUMANITIES 6 LIFE subject SCIENCES collections MEDICINE MATHEMATICS & PHYSICAL SCIENCES LAW @OUPLibraries For further information visit: COLLECTION 2020 | 3 Nobel Prize winning journals authors in all 7 subject ranked #1 collections Over in at least one 6 category 200 MILLION DOWNLOADS in 2018 Over Over 75% 70% of these are in the of journals have top 50% of at least an Impact Factor one category Impact Factor and Ranking Source: 2018 Journal Impact Factor, Journal Citation Reports (Web of Science Group, 2019) academic.oup.com/journals/collection @OUPLibraries 4 | OXFORD JOURNALS Rankings in Best JCR Subject Category Grand Total Mathematics & Physical Sciences Law Life Sciences Humanities Top 10% 10% to 25% Social Sciences 25% to 50% Bottom 50% Medicine No JCR Entry 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Impact Factor and Ranking Source: 2018 Journal Impact Factor, Journal Citation Reports (Web of Science Group, 2019) Cost per Citation ($) GRAND Food Health Agriculture Astronomy Biology Botany Chemistry Geography Geology Physics Zoology TOTAL Science Sciences OUP 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.16 0.19 0.20 0.03 0.53 0.17 0.09 0.33 0.14 Survey 0.29 0.32 0.16 0.28 0.31 0.22 0.35 0.44 0.25 0.22 0.28 0.55 Language Math & Business & Philosophy Political Social Education History & Law Computer Music Psychology Sociology Economics & Religion Science Sciences Literature Science OUP 0.19 0.42 0.68 0.55 0.95 0.21 0.43 0.49 0.44 0.14 0.21 0.19 Survey 0.57 0.66 1.51 1.78 0.69 0.50 2.63 5.77 0.72 0.26 0.76 0.60 The survey data shows the average cost per citation of journals in Clarivate Analytics Indexes (source: Library Journal Periodicals Price Survey 2019) @OUPLibraries For further information visit: 14 | OXFORD JOURNALS Oxford University Press supports open access OUP publishes over 60 journals that are fully Open Access and therefore freely available online: Journal Name Impact Factor Journal Name Impact Factor Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum Journal of Cybersecurity Animal Frontiers 1.984 Journal of Geophysics and Engineering Antibody Therapeutics Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery AoB PLANTS 2.270 Journal of Insect Science 1.446 Arthropod Management Tests Journal of Integrable Systems Biology Methods and Protocols Journal of Integrated Pest Management 2.333 Brain Communications (new)1 Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2.431 Burns and Trauma (new)1 Journal of Legal Analysis 1.941 Cerebral Cortex Communications (new)1 Journal of Molecular Cell Biology 4.671 Clean Energy Journal of Radiation Research 2.014 Clinical Kidney Journal 2.975 Journal of Surgical Case Reports Conservation Physiology 3.634 Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Crohn’s & Colitis 360 (new)1 Journal of the Endocrine Society Current Developments in Nutrition Journal of Urban Ecology Current Zoology 2.070 NAR Cancer (new) Database 3.683 NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (new) DNA Research 4.000 Neuro-Oncology Advances (new) Environmental Epigenetics Neuroscience of Consciousness European Heart Journal - Case Reports Neurosurgery Open (new)1 Evolution, Medicine, & Public Health 4.400 Nucleic Acids Research 11.147 Food Quality and Safety Open Forum Infectious Diseases 3.371 Gastroenterology Report 2.194 Oxford Medical Case Reports Genome Biology and Evolution 3.726 Precision Clinical Medicine GigaScience 4.688 Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2.022 Human Reproduction Open Regenerative Biomaterials 3.382 in silico Plants Rheumatology Advances in Practice Innovation in Aging Schizophrenia Bulletin Open (new)1 Integrative Organismal Biology SLEEP Advances (new)1 International Health (new)1 1.664 Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (SCAN) 3.662 International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 1.054 Synthetic Biology International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 4.207 Transactions of Mathematics and its Applications JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance (new) Translational Animal Science JAMIA Open Transportation Safety and Environment JNCI Cancer Spectrum Virus Evolution 5.408 1Fully Open Access from 2020 2Newly converted to Open Access @OUPLibraries For further information visit: key services for your library ACCESS FROM FLEXIBLE LATEST ISSUE PRICING BACK TO 1996 For institutions or Plus perpetual access consortia of any size to subscribed years of content TRAINING SIMPLE RESOURCES CONTROL Including user Manage multiple guides, webinars, subscriptions and in-person via one online training account TOOLS FOR RESEARCHERS USAGE Email alerts, downloadable MONITORING references, and integrated COUNTER 5-compliant searching via PubMed and usage reports all in Google Scholar and many other one place discovery and indexing services CONTACT US For more information, a free trial for your library, or a quotation, please contact your account manager or your regional team: In the Americas: [email protected] | +1 919 677 0977 Outside of the Americas: [email protected] | +44 1865 353907.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gies for Increasing Citations
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International SERIES on Information Systems and Management in Creative eMedia (CreMedia) Maximized Research Impact: Effective Strate- gies for Increasing Citations Nader Ale Ebrahim*1, Hossein Gholizadeh2, Artur Lugmayr3 1Research Support Unit, Centre for Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of Malaya, Malaysia, Email: [email protected], *Corresponding author 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 3VisLab., School of Media, Culture and Creative Arts, Curtin University, Perth, Australia Abstract The high competitive environment has forced higher education authori- ties to set their strategies to improve university ranking. Citations of published pa- pers are among the most widely used inputs to measure national and global uni- versity ranking (which accounts for 20% of QS, 30% of THE, and etc.). Therefore, from one hand, improving the citation impact of a search is one of the university manager’s strategies. On the other hand, the researchers are also looking for some helpful techniques to increase their citation record. This chapter by reviewing the relevant articles covers 48 different strategies for maximizing research impact and visibility. The results show that some features of article can help predict the num- ber of article views and citation counts. The findings presented in this chapter could be used by university authorities, authors, reviewers, and editors to maxim- ize the impact of articles in the scientific community. Keywords: University ranking, Improve citation, Citation frequency, Research impact, Open access, h-index Introduction The research output is an essential part of an institution’s measure and evaluation of research quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Popularity and Outcomes of All Biorxiv Preprints
    1 Meta-Research: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv 2 preprints 3 Richard J. Abdill1 and Ran Blekhman1,2 4 1 – Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, 5 Minneapolis, MN 6 2 – Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 7 MN 8 9 ORCID iDs 10 RJA: 0000-0001-9565-5832 11 RB: 0000-0003-3218-613X 12 13 Correspondence 14 Ran Blekhman, PhD 15 University of Minnesota 16 MCB 6-126 17 420 Washington Avenue SE 18 Minneapolis, MN 55455 19 Email: [email protected] 1 20 Abstract 21 The growth of preprints in the life sciences has been reported widely and is 22 driving policy changes for journals and funders, but little quantitative information has 23 been published about preprint usage. Here, we report how we collected and analyzed 24 data on all 37,648 preprints uploaded to bioRxiv.org, the largest biology-focused preprint 25 server, in its first five years. The rate of preprint uploads to bioRxiv continues to grow 26 (exceeding 2,100 in October 2018), as does the number of downloads (1.1 million in 27 October 2018). We also find that two-thirds of preprints posted before 2017 were later 28 published in peer-reviewed journals, and find a relationship between the number of 29 downloads a preprint has received and the impact factor of the journal in which it is 30 published. We also describe Rxivist.org, a web application that provides multiple ways 31 to interact with preprint metadata. 32 Introduction 33 In the 30 days of September 2018, four leading biology journals – The Journal of 34 Biochemistry, PLOS Biology, Genetics and Cell – published 85 full-length research 35 articles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reference Bacterial Genome Dataset Generated on the Miniontm Portable Single-Molecule Nanopore Sequencer Joshua Quick1,2, Aaron R Quinlan3 and Nicholas J Loman1*
    Quick et al. GigaScience (2015) 4:6 DOI 10.1186/s13742-015-0043-z ERRATUM Open Access Erratum: A reference bacterial genome dataset generated on the MinIONTM portable single-molecule nanopore sequencer Joshua Quick1,2, Aaron R Quinlan3 and Nicholas J Loman1* Recently we noticed that we could not reproduce Author details Figure three (Figure 1 here) while analysing this data as 1Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. 2NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology part of a new experiment [1]. This was due to a modifica- Research Centre, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK. 3Center tion to the script used for extracting sequence alignment for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Virginia, Charlottesville, VA profiles from the dataset [2]. On further investigation we 22908, US. found that an error in this script had been reported and Received: 31 December 2014 Accepted: 5 January 2015 a fix supplied by an anonymous online contributor on October 27th 2014 via Github [3]. The error prevented mismatches from being properly counted in the calcu- References lation of read accuracy (insertions and deletions were). 1. Quick J, Quinlan AR, Loman NJ. A reference bacterial genome dataset generated on the minion™ portable single-molecule nanopore We therefore present updated versions of Figures three sequencer. GigaScience. 2014;3:22. (Figure 1 here) and four (Figure 2 here) generated by the 2. Quinlan AR. 2014. https://github.com/arq5x/nanopore-scripts/blob/ corrected script. We are grateful to the anonymous con- master/count-errors.py.Github 3. Anon. 2014. https://github.com/arq5x/nanopore-scripts/pull/1.Github tributor who noticed this error.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Science and the Role of Publishers in Reproducible Research
    Open science and the role of publishers in reproducible research Authors: Iain Hrynaszkiewicz (Faculty of 1000), Peter Li (BGI), Scott Edmunds (BGI) Chapter summary Reproducible computational research is and will be facilitated by the wide availability of scientific data, literature and code which is freely accessible and, furthermore, licensed such that it can be reused, inteGrated and built upon to drive new scientific discoveries without leGal impediments. Scholarly publishers have an important role in encouraGing and mandating the availability of data and code accordinG to community norms and best practices, and developinG innovative mechanisms and platforms for sharinG and publishinG products of research, beyond papers in journals. Open access publishers, in particular the first commercial open access publisher BioMed Central, have played a key role in the development of policies on open access and open data, and increasing the use by scientists of leGal tools – licenses and waivers – which maximize reproducibility. Collaborations, between publishers and funders of scientific research, are vital for the successful implementation of reproducible research policies. The genomics and, latterly, other ‘omics communities historically have been leaders in the creation and wide adoption of policies on public availability of data. This has been throuGh policies, such as Fort Lauderdale and the Bermuda Principles; infrastructure, such as the INSDC databases; and incentives, such as conditions of journal publication. We review some of these policies and practices, and how these events relate to the open access publishinG movement. We describe the implementation and adoption of licenses and waivers prepared by Creative Commons, in science publishinG, with a focus on licensing of research data published in scholarly journals and data repositories.
    [Show full text]
  • Normalization and Variance Stabilization of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data Using Regularized Negative Binomial Regression Christoph Hafemeister1* and Rahul Satija1,2*
    Hafemeister and Satija Genome Biology (2019) 20:296 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1874-1 Method Open Access Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression Christoph Hafemeister1* and Rahul Satija1,2* Abstract Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data exhibits significant cell-to-cell variation due to technical factors, including the number of molecules detected in each cell, which can confound biological heterogeneity with technical effects. To address this, we present a modeling framework for the normalization and variance stabilization of molecular count data from scRNA-seq experiments. We propose that the Pearson residuals from “regularized negative binomial regression,” where cellular sequencing depth is utilized as a covariate in a generalized linear model, successfully remove the influence of technical characteristics from downstream analyses while preserving biological heterogeneity. Importantly, we show that an unconstrained negative binomial model may overfit scRNA-seq data, and overcome this by pooling information across genes with similar abundances to obtain stable parameter estimates. Our procedure omits the need for heuristic steps including pseudocount addition or log-transformation and improves common downstream analytical tasks such as variable gene selection, dimensional reduction, and differential expression. Our approach can be applied to any UMI-based scRNA-seq dataset and is freely available as part of the R package sctransform, with a direct interface to our single-cell toolkit Seurat. Keywords: Single-cell RNA-seq, Normalization Introduction sampling during sequencing also contribute significantly, In the analysis and interpretation of single-cell RNA- necessitating technical correction [4]. These same chal- seq (scRNA-seq) data, effective pre-processing and nor- lenges apply to bulk RNA-seq workflows, but are exac- malization represent key challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Citation Databases for Legal Scholarship
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Law Librarian Journal Articles Law Librarian Scholarship 3-19-2020 Citation Databases for Legal Scholarship John R. Beatty University at Buffalo School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/law_librarian_articles Part of the Law Commons, Law Librarianship Commons, and the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation John R. Beatty, Citation Databases for Legal Scholarship, 39 Legal Ref. Servs. Q. 56 (2020). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/law_librarian_articles/50 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Legal Reference Services Quarterly on March 19, 2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0270319X.2020.1738198. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Librarian Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Librarian Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Citation Databases for Legal Scholarship John R. Beatty a* a Charles B. Sears Law Library, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA John Beatty, Charles B. Sears Law Library, O’Brian Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260, [email protected], ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4940-8483 John R. Beatty is the Faculty Scholarship Outreach Librarian at the Charles B. Sears Law Library at the University at Buffalo. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Legal Reference Services Quarterly on March 19, 2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0270319X.2020.1738198.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Biology Celebrates Its Fifth Anniversary Biomedcentral
    BioMed Central Editorial Journal of Biology celebrates its fifth anniversary Published: 29 June 2007 Journal of Biology 2007, 6:5 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://jbiol.com/content/6/3/5 © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd Five years ago this month, Journal of have been cited and accessed. Publish- an article by Mark Noble and col- Biology was launched under the guid- ing on average only every two months leagues provided evidence that brain ance of Editor-in-Chief Martin Raff has its perils, however: both authors cells are susceptible to chemotherapy and Editor Theodora Bloom as the and readers told us that they’d be [10]; the article has been downloaded premier biology journal of the open happier to see a journal that wasn’t so more than 5,000 times from the access publisher BioMed Central, the very selective and published more Journal of Biology site with a flurry of publisher of Genome Biology and the often. The journal is now planning to media interest. BMC series of journals. As we cele- build on its success in publishing Of course, for many authors, brate Journal of Biology’s birthday, we high-quality articles and is striving to readers and institutions there is one take this opportunity to reflect on the increase the rate of publication, while measure that matters above all others first five years during which the maintaining a very high standard. in evaluating a journal: the impact journal has published articles of factor, as determined by The Thomson exceptional interest across the full Corporation (ISI).
    [Show full text]
  • Citations and Gamed Metrics: Academic Integrity Lost
    Acad. Quest. (2021) 34.1 DOI 10.51845/34s.1.18 10.51845/34s.1.18 Articles Citations and Gamed Metrics: Academic Integrity Lost Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Author-based metrics (ABMs) and journal-based metrics (JBMs), as well as citations, are the dominant currency of intellectual recognition in academia. These metrics and citations continue to be dominated by the Clarivate Analytics Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and are still widely used as a surrogate to determine prestige, scientific credit, and influence.1 However, their dominance in this area needs to be rethought, especially in China, which accounts for approximately 19 percent of total scientific research papers globally.2 China, like several other countries, games the JIF for financial compensation in pay-to-publish schemes based on JIF-carrying journals.3 A competing metric, CiteScore, is also showing signs of being gamed.4 It is possible that CiteScore may have evolved, following Goodhart’s Law, as JIF’s relevance as an “academic” metric began to fray. 5 The culture of metrics, especially the JIF, to measure success, reputation, and productivity, or JIF-based praise platforms such as Clarivate Analytics’ “Highly Cited Researchers” report inflate the problem because they elevate the perceived excellence of single individuals above all others, when in fact most publishing success is collaborative.6 The survival of many academics and journals in this publish-or-perish culture depends on such metrics, as authors seek journals with higher JIFs in which to publish their findings. In the gold 1 Erin C. McKiernan, Lesley A. Schimanski, Carol Muñoz Nieves, Lisa Matthias, Meredith T.
    [Show full text]
  • Purifying Selection of Long Dsrna Is the First Line of Defense Against False Activation of Innate Immunity Michal Barak1, Hagit T
    Barak et al. Genome Biology (2020) 21:26 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-1937-3 RESEARCH Open Access Purifying selection of long dsRNA is the first line of defense against false activation of innate immunity Michal Barak1, Hagit T. Porath1, Gilad Finkelstein1, Binyamin A. Knisbacher1, Ilana Buchumenski1, Shalom Hillel Roth1, Erez Y. Levanon1*† and Eli Eisenberg2*† Abstract Background: Mobile elements comprise a large fraction of metazoan genomes. Accumulation of mobile elements is bound to produce multiple putative double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) structures within the transcriptome. These endogenous dsRNA structures resemble viral RNA and may trigger false activation of the innate immune response, leading to severe damage to the host cell. Adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is a common post- transcriptional modification, abundant within repetitive elements of all metazoans. It was recently shown that a key function of A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR1 is to suppress the immunogenic response by endogenous dsRNAs. Results: Here, we analyze the transcriptomes of dozens of species across the Metazoa and identify a strong genomic selection against endogenous dsRNAs, resulting in their purification from the canonical transcriptome. This purifying selection is especially strong for long and nearly perfect dsRNAs. These are almost absent from mRNAs, but not pre-mRNAs, supporting the notion of selection due to cytoplasmic processes. The few long and nearly perfect structures found in human transcripts are weakly expressed and often heavily edited. Conclusion: Purifying selection of long dsRNA is an important defense mechanism against false activation of innate immunity. This newly identified principle governs the integration of mobile elements into the genome, a major driving force of genome evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access—What's New, What's Worked, What Hasn't
    Annual Meeting Reports Open Access—What’s New, What’s Worked, What Hasn’t Moderator: began talking about requiring OA, it was data and software be freely available and Deborah Kahn thought that publishers would jump right that reviews be signed. Executive Vice President, Publishing into the Gold OA model: An author pays The Journal of Neuroinflammation has BioMed Central a fee and an article appears in a journal been OA from its beginnings in 2004 London, United Kingdom in which all articles are OA. Not surpris- because the editors-in-chief believed that ingly, many publishers have been leery of OA was the wave of the future. Current Speakers: suddenly converting all their titles to Gold Editor-in-Chief Sue T Griffin present- Barbara Goldman OA without some idea of how it will affect ed the viewpoint of this established OA Director, Journals their revenue. Some are using a hybrid OA journal. Like GigaScience, the Journal of American Society for Microbiology model, in which an author can buy OA for Neuroinflammation has no embargo period, Washington, DC an article in a subscription journal. so all articles are made available on publi- Deborah Kahn, of BioMed Central, pub- cation. However, authors are charged a pro- Laurie Goodman lisher of more than 260 OA journals, led a cessing fee, whereas GigaScience has no fees Editor-in-Chief lively and informative panel that comprised for authors. Another difference between GigaScience five OA viewpoints: those of the author, these OA journals is in their style of peer BioMed Central the editor of an established OA journal, review.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Popularity and Outcomes of All Biorxiv Preprints
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/515643; this version posted January 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints 2 Richard J. Abdill1 and Ran Blekhman1,2 3 1 – Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, 4 Minneapolis, MN 5 2 – Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 6 MN 7 8 ORCID iDs 9 RJA: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-5832 10 RB: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3218-613X 11 12 Correspondence 13 Ran Blekhman, PhD 14 University of Minnesota 15 MCB 6-126 16 420 Washington Avenue SE 17 Minneapolis, MN 55455 18 Email: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/515643; this version posted January 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. 19 Abstract 20 Researchers in the life sciences are posting their Work to preprint servers at an 21 unprecedented and increasing rate, sharing papers online before (or instead of) 22 publication in peer-revieWed journals. Though the popularity and practical benefits of 23 preprints are driving policy changes at journals and funding organizations, there is little 24 bibliometric data available to measure trends in their usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Print Special Issue Flyer
    IMPACT FACTOR 4.096 an Open Access Journal by MDPI Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution Guest Editors: Message from the Guest Editors Prof. Dr. Maria Sharakhova Dear Colleagues, Fralin Life Science Institute, The development of next generation sequencing Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA technologies in the last decade has led to obtaining highly- fragmented genome assemblies for numerous organisms. [email protected] The quality of genome assemblies significantly varies Dr. Vladimir Trifonov among species, depending of the abundance of the Institute of Molecular and repetitive elements and levels of genetic polymorphism. As Cellular Biology of the Siberian a result, many important problems in genome biology Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMCB SB RAS), remain unresolved, without understanding how the 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia genome is organized at the level of the chromosomes. [email protected] Recent advances in genome and chromosome technologies, including long-read sequencing, Hi-C scaffoding, chromosome flow sorting, and physical and optical mapping, allow for obtaining genome assemblies Deadline for manuscript at the level of complete chromosomes. Such assemblies submissions: closed (30 April 2021) provide new opportunities to study chromosome organization and evolution, structural genome variations, sex-biased gene expression, epigenomic modifications, and long-range chromatin interactions. In this Special Issue, we would like to invite submissions of original research and review articles, with a special focus on chromosomes in our understanding of the genome structure, function, and evolution. mdpi.com/si/32917 SpeciaIslsue IMPACT FACTOR 4.096 an Open Access Journal by MDPI Editor-in-Chief Message from the Editor-in-Chief Prof.
    [Show full text]