District Irrigation Plan of Boudh (Odisha)

DISTRICT IRRIGATION PLAN OF BOUDH (ODISHA)

PRADHAN MANTRI KRISHI SINCHAYEE YOJANA (PMKSY)

MARCH-2016 DISTRICT LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE BOUDH, ODISHA 1

Prepared by: District Level Implementation Committee, Boudh, Odisha

Technical Support by: Technical Support Agency, RRTTS, G. Udayagiri, (OUAT), Kandhamal,Odisha-762100, Phone(OFF) 06847-260012 [email protected]

Acknowledgement

I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude and indebtedness to Sri Madhusudan Mishra, I.A.S, Collector-cum-District Magistrate of Boudh District for his valuable guidance, able supervision, constructive criticism, enthusiastic interest and painstaking effort throughout the period of preparation of District Irrigation Plan (DIP), Boudh.

I deem it the rarest opportunity and proud privilege to express my profound sense of immeasurable gratitude and indebtedness to Professor Dr. P. N. Jagdev, Dean of Research, OUAT, Bhubaneswar for his timely supervision, release of funds and inspiration for completion of Draft of DIP, Boudh with busy schedule of works, I am also grateful to the Professor Dr. A. K. Mohanty, Nodal Officer of DIP of 5 districts of Odisha for providing technical assistance, timely guidance and co-operation throughout the preparation of DIP, Boudh.

I would like to express my thankfulness to Dr. Amulya Parida, Professor & Head, Department of statistics for his prudent inspiration, clarification, constructive criticism and devoting longtime with his busy schedule of work. I am also indebted to Dr. D. K. Debata and Dr. D. Panigrahi, Senior Scientist, RRTTS, G. Udayagiri, O.U.A.T. for giving support in completion of DIP work.

My sincere thanks to Sri Niranjan Sahu, Consultant DIP, Odisha Watershed Mission, Bhubaneswar for his co-operation and suggestions during the preparation of DIP, Boudh. My sincere thanks to Sri Kar Babu, for extending his helping hands voluntarily during the investigation and preparation of the manuscript of DIP, Boudh. I highly obliged to Sri Raghab Mallick, Project Director, Watersheds, Boudh, Sri Sridhar Das, Convener and DDA, Boudh, Sri Deepak Mahapatra, Technical Expert, Sri Padmanava Nayak, Data Entry Operator, Sri Dillip Kumar Pradhan, Data Entry Operator, Watersheds, Boudh, Sri A. K. Sahu, Executive Engineer, OLIC, Boudh, Sri A. K. Sethy, Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Boudh, Sri G. P. Prusty, Executive Engineer, MIP, Boudh, Sri Bibhudutta Pradhan, Designer, CADA, Boudh for their co-operation during preparation of DIP, Boudh. Last but not the least, I wish to express my appreciation and gratefulness to one and all who had helped me in any manner for completion of DIP, Boudh. At length, I bow down my head with devotion and selfness before the Almighty for fulfillm ent of his eternal desire.

Akshaya Kumar Sethy, Nodal Officer, RRTTS, G. Udayagiri, OUAT

Contents Chapter Particulars Page Executive Summary 1. Introduction 13 i. Background 13-14 ii. Vision 14 iii. Objective 14-15 iv. Strategy/Approach 15-19 v. Rationale/Justification Statement 19-20 Chapter-I: General Information of the District: 1.1: District Profile: 21-25 1.2: Demography: 26-31 1.3: Biomass and Livestock 32-37 1.4: Agro-Ecology, Climate,Hydrology and Topography: 38-41 1.5: Soil Profile: 41-51 1.6: Soil Erossion And Runoff Status: 51 1.7: Land Use Pattern: 51-55 Chapter-II: District Water Profile: 2.1: Area Wise, Crop Wise irrigation Status: 56-60 2.2: Production and Productivity of Major Crops: 60-64 2.3: Irrigation based classification: 65 Chapter III: Water Availability: 3.1: Status of Water Availability: 66-67 3.2: Status of Ground Water Availability: 67 3.3: Status of Command Area: 67-68 3.4: Existing Type of Irrigation: 68-69 Chapter IV: Water Requirement /Demand: 4.1: Domestic Water Demand: 70 4.2: Crop Water Demand: 71-72 4.3: Livestock Water Demand: 72-73 4.4: Industrial Water Demand: 74-75 4.5: Water Demand for Power Generation: 75 4.6: Total Water Demand of the District for Various sectors: 76 4.7: Water Budget: 77-78 Chapter V: Strategic Action Flan for Irrigation in District under PMKSY 79-111 Annexure-I Water requirement of different Crops 112 Common Values of water requirement of different livestock 113 Annexure-II List of projects 114 Phone Numbers of DLIC Members 116 5

List of Tables SL. Title Page No. 1.1 District Profile of Boudh 22 1.1.1. Forest Area of the District 23 1.1.2. Administrative Set-up of Boudh District 25 1.2. Demographic Situation of Boudh District 27 1.3. Block Wise Biomass and Livestock Data of the District 33 1.3.1. The Different Veterinary Institutions in the District 36 1.4. Agro Ecology Climate Hydrology and Topographic Situations of Boudh 39 1.4.1 ACS and AES of Boudh District 39 1.4.2. Block Wise Monthly Rainfall Data of the Year 2014-15 in mm. 40 1.5. Major Soil classes and type of the District and Blocks. 42 1.5.1 Soil types in Boudh 44 1.5.2 The block wise soil reaction and fertility status in percent 44 1.6. Soil Erosion and Run Off Status of the Boudh District 51 1.7. Land Use Pattern of Boudh District (Area in thousand ha. ) 52 2.1. Area Wise Crop Wise Irrigation Status 58 2.1.1. Source wise Area Irrigated (Area in hectares) of the Year 2014-15 59 2.2. Production and Productivity of Major Crops 62 2.2.1. The Production and Productivity of Major Horticultural Crops During 2015 63 2.2.2. Area, Production and Yield of Major Horticulture Crops During 2013 63 Area, Production and Productivity Trend of Main Crops in the District 2.2.3. 64 ( Area – ha, Production–q,productivity –q/ha) 2.3. Irrigation Based Classification of Boudh District 65 3.1. Status of Water Availability 66 3.2 . Status of Ground Water Availability 67 3.3. Status of Command Area 67 3.4 . Existing type of irrigation 69 4.1. Domestic Water Demand 70 4.2 Crop Water Requirement 71-72 4.3. Livestock Water Demand for the Boudh District 73 4.4. Industrial Water Demand for Boudh District 74 4.5. Water Demand for Power Generation 75 4.6. Total Water Demand of the District for Various Sectors 76 4.7. Water Budget 77 PLAN-A: Component 1 Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh Distri ct 5.1. 82-98 ( Odisha ) under PMKSY and state plan & other irrigation schemes PLAN- B: Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District (Odisha) 5.2. 99-111 under PMKSY

List of figures

SL. Title Page No. 1.1.1. District Map of Boudh 21 1.1.2. Forest Area of the District 23 1.1.3 Map of Reserve Forest Area 24 1.2.1. Block wise total population 28 1.2.2 Block wise and caste wise population classification 29 1.2.3. Block wise household and family members 30 1.2.4. The Population growth Trend of Boudh District (1901-2011) 31 1.3.1. Block wise Small Animal Distribution 34 1.3.2. Block wise Distribution of Cattle Population 35 1.3.3. Veterenary Institutions in Boudh Block 37 1.4.1. Rainfall trend of Boudh District from 2006-2015 40 1.5.1. Soil Classification Map of Boudh 43 1.5.2 The Soil Status in Boudh 44 1.5.3 Land Slope Classification of Boudh Block 45 1.5.4 Land Slope Classification of Harabhanga Block 46 1.5.5. Land Slope Classification of Kantamal Block 47 1.5.6. Soil Classification of Boudh Block 48 1.5.7. Soil Classification of Harabhanga Block 49 1.5.8. Soil classification of Kantamal Block 50 1.7.1. Land Utilisation Pattern of the Boudh District 52 1.7.2. Land Use Pattern of Boudh Block (Area in thousand Ha.) 53 1.7.3. Land Use Pattern of Harabhanga Block (Area in thousand Ha.) 54 1.7.4. Land Use Pattern of Kantamal Block (Area in thousand Ha.) 55 2.1.1. Block wise Irrigated Area 60 4.1.1 Domestic water demand of Boudh district 70 4.3.1. Livestock water demand of Boudh district 73 4.4.1 Industrial water demand of Boudh district 75 4.6.1 Total water demand of Boudh district of various sectors 76 4.7.1 Water budget 78

ABBREVIATIONS

ACS Agro- Climatic Situation ADH Assistant Director of Horticulture ADR Associate Director of Research AES Agro-Ecological Situation AIBP Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme AIC Artificial Insemination BBSR Bhubaneswar BCM Billion Cubic Metres BDA Block Development Authority CADA Command Area Development Agency CDC Cattle Development Centre CDCP Check Dam Construction Programme CDVO Chief District Veterinary Officer Ch Children DAC&FW Department of Agricultural Co-Operation & Farmer’s Welfare DDA Deputy Director Agriculture DIC District Industries Centre DIP District Irrigation Plan DLIC District Level Irrigation DoLR Department of Land Resources DoWR DPAP Drought Prone Area Programme GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geography Information System GWD Ground Water development HA Hactre HaM Hactre Metre ICT Information Communication Technology ILDC Integrated Livestock Development Centre KVK Krishi Vigyan Kendra LA Large Animal LDC Livestock Development Centre LI Lift Irrigation MCP Mega Lift Construction Programme

MGNREGA Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Act MGNREGS Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme MI Minor Irrigation MOA&FW Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare MoRD Ministry of Rural Development MoWR Ministry of Water Resources MT Metric Tone NAC Notified Area Council NGO Non Government Organization NIC National Informatics Centre NRM Natural Resource Management OAIC Odisha Agro- Industries Corporation OBC Other Backward Classes OIP Other Irrigation Project ORSAC Odisha Space Application Centre OUAT Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology PD Project Director PET Potential Evapo Transpiration PMKSY Pradhan Mantra Krishi Sinchai Yojana Qt Quintal RRR Repair Renovation and Restoration RRTTS Regional Research and Technology Transfer Station SA Small Animal SC Schedule Caste SIP Surface Irrigation Project SIP State irrigation Plan SIP Salki irrigation project ST Schedule Tribe TSA Technical Support Agency VAS Veterinary Assistant Surgeon WHS Water Harvesting Structure WR Water Resources

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

Agriculture is the main stay of people and around 95% of the population depends upon this sector as source of their livelihood in Boudh district. It contributes one fifth of the total gross domestic product (GDP), provides employment to 76% of total workforce, contributes 9.5% of the total export earnings and provides raw materials to a large number of industries. The district of Boudh has geographical area of 3444.8 Sq.km. and is under western central table land agro climatic zone depending upon the soil types, topography, rainfall, cropping pattern with uneven and hilly terrain. The district receives normal rainfall 1597.10 mm within 68.10 rainy days.

As agriculture development is directly proportional to irrigation potential of the district, the “Prime Minister Krishi Sinchayee Yojana ” (PMKSY) was promoted by honorable President of India in his address during 16 th Lok Sabha for bringing revolution to agricultural sector by enhancing crop production and productivity. The main thrust of PMKSY yojana is Har Khet Ko Pani and Per drop more crop . The government of India has mandated different state governments to prepare District Irrigation Plans (DIP) which would strategically plan for the expansion of irrigation area of the concerned district which would trigger higher crop production and productivity.

The DIPs has emphasized to enhance the water potential of the district by creating diversified water sources by promotion of water harvesting structure, lift irrigation system, open well, dug well, cement lining of canal system and enhancing the existing command area.

Background

The Associate Director of Research (ADR), Regional Research and Technology Transfer Station (RRTTS), Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), G.Udayagiri, Kandhamal, Odisha has been entrusted to prepare the District Irrigation Plan (DIP) for Boudh district by the Dean of Research, OUAT, Bhubaneswar. The ADR selected a team of scientists consisting of 4 members working under him to visit the Boudh district and conduct 10

meetings in consultation with DLIC members. The University was assigned to prepare DIP for Boudh district in the capacity of Technical Support Agency (TSA) whose main mandate is to prepare the DIP in consultation and coordination with DLIC. The role of TSA is to provide hand holding and technical support to DLIC in preparing a good, relevant and tangible irrigation plan for the district. The data for the preparation of DIP was collected, collated and organised in DIP templates by the Project Director, Watershed 0f Boudh district and was handed over to OUAT after a through discussions in DLIC meetings. The role of OUAT after receipt of data was to scrutinize the authenticity, reliability and credibility of the data. The final selected data was analysed and interpreted for the preparation of DIP for the district.

Vision

The prime vision of the District Irrigation Plan is Har khet ko pani and Per drop more crop . The thrust is to improve the production and productivity of agricultural crops by provision of irrigation facilities and improve income from farm sector.

Objective

The broad objectives of PMKSY are:

a) Achieve convergence of investments in irrigation at the field level (preparation of district level and, if required, sub district level water use plans).

b) Enhance the physical access of water on the farm and expand cultivable area under assured irrigation ( Har Khet ko pani ),

c) Integration of water source, distribution and its efficient use, to make best use of water through appropriate technologies and practices.

d) Improve on-farm water use efficiency to reduce wastage and increase availability both in duration and extent,

e) Enhance the adoption of precision-irrigation and other water saving technologies (More crop per drop).

f) Enhance recharge of aquifers and introduce sustainable water conservation practices

g) Ensure the integrated development of rainfed areas using the watershed approach towards soil and water conservation, regeneration of ground water, arresting runoff, providing livelihood options and other NRM activities.

h) Promote extension activities relating to water harvesting, water management and crop alignment for farmers and grass root level field functionaries.

i) Explore the feasibility of reusing treated municipal waste water for peri-urban agriculture, and

j) Attract greater private investments in irrigation.

Strategy and Approach

To achieve above objectives, PMKSY will strategize by focussing on end-to end solution in irrigation supply chain, viz. water sources, distribution network, efficient farm level applications, extension services on new technologies & information etc. Broadly, PMKSY in preparation of DIP for Boudh district will focus on:-

a) Creation of new water sources; repair, restoration and renovation of defunct water sources; construction of water harvesting structures, secondary & micro storage, groundwater development, enhancing potentials of traditional water bodies at village level like Bandhas (Odisha) etc.

b) Developing/augmenting distribution network where irrigation sources (both ) are available or created; assured and protective

c) Promotion of scientific moisture conservation and run off control measures to improve ground water recharge so as to create opportunities for farmer to access recharged water through shallow tube/dug wells;

d) Promoting efficient water conveyance and field application devices within the farm viz, underground piping system, Drip & Sprinklers, pivots, rain-guns and other application devices etc.;

e) Encouraging community irrigation through registered user groups/farmer producers’

organisations/NGOs; and 12

f) Farmer oriented activities like capacity building, training and exposure visits, demonstrations, farm schools, skill development in efficient water and crop management practices (crop alignment) including large scale awareness on more crop per drop of water through mass media campaign, exhibitions, field days, and extension activities through short animation films etc.

The PMKSY will have following programme components:

A. Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme (AIBP):

To focus on faster completion of ongoing Major and Medium Irrigation including National Projects.

B. PMKSY ( Har Khet ko Pani )

a) Creation of new water sources through Minor Irrigation (both surface and ground water)

b) Repair, restoration and renovation of water bodies; strengthening carrying capacity of traditional water sources, construction rain water harvesting structures (Jal Sanchay);

c) Command area development, strengthening and creation of distribution network from source to the farm;

d) Ground water development in the areas where it is abundant, so that sink is created to store runoff/ flood water during peak rainy season.

e) Improvement in water management and distribution system for water bodies to take advantage of the available source which is not tapped to its fullest capacity (deriving benefits from low hanging fruits). At least 10% of the command area to be covered under micro/ precision irrigation.

f) Diversion of water from source of different location where it is plenty to nearby water scarce areas, lift irrigation from water bodies/rivers at lower elevation to supplement requirements beyond IWMP and MGNREGS irrespective of irrigation command.

g) Creating and rejuvenating traditional water storage systems like Jal Katas, Bandhas in Odisha at feasible locations.

C. PMKSY (Per Drop More Crop):

a) Programme management, preparation of State/District Irrigation Plan, approval of annual action plan, Monitoring etc.

b) Promoting efficient water conveyance and precision water application devices like drips, sprinklers, pivots, rain-guns in the farm (Jal Sinchan);

c) Topping up of input cost particularly under civil construction beyond permissible limit (40%), under MGNREGS for activities like lining inlet, outlet, silt traps, distribution system etc.

d) Construction of micro irrigation structures to supplement source creation activities including tube wells and dug wells (in areas where ground water is available and not under semi critical /critical /over exploited category of development) which are not supported under AIBP, PMKSY (Har Khet ko Pani), PMKSY (Watershed) and MGNREGS as per block/district irrigation plan.

e) Secondary storage structures at tail end of canal system to store water when available in abundance (rainy season) or from perennial sources likestreams for use during dry periods through effective on-farm water management;

f) Water lifting devices like diesel/ electric/ solar pumpsets including water carriage pipes, underground piping system.

g) Extension activities for promotion of scientific moisture conservation and agronomic measures including cropping alignment to maximise use of available water including rainfall and minimise irrigation requirement (Jal sarankchan);

h) Capacity building, training and awareness campaign including low cost publications, use of pico projectors and low cost films for encouraging potential use water source through technological, agronomic and management practices including community irrigation.

i) The extension workers will be empowered to disseminate relevant technologies under PMKSY only after requisite training is provided to them especially in the area of promotion of scientific moisture conservation and agronomic measures, improved/ innovative distribution system like pipe and box outlet system, etc. Appropriate Domain Experts will act as Master Trainers.

j) Information Communication Technology (ICT) interventions through NeGP-A to be made use in the field of water use efficiency, precision irrigation technologies, on farm water management, crop alignment etc. and also to do intensive monitoring of the Scheme.

D. PMKSY (Watershed Development)

a) Effective management of runoff water and improved soil & moisture conservation activities such as ridge area treatment, drainage line treatment, rain water harvesting, in-situ moisture conservation and other allied activities on watershed basis.

b) Converging with MGNREGS for creation of water source to full potential in identified backward rainfed blocks including renovation of traditional water bodies

Calculation Factors

• 100 litres of water per day was considered for domestic consumptions both per rural and urban population.

• The annual population growth rate from 2001 census to 2011 census was considered for projecting population growth from 2015 to 2021.

• The crop water requirement as standardised by Indian Institute of Water Management, ICAR, Government of India , Chandrasekhrpur, Bhubaneswar was used to calculate the water requirement for crop, small & large ruminant animals and poultry birds. (Annexure-1).

• Around 80% water requirement for kharif crop is assumed to be met from seasonal rainfall and hence the net crop water demand

for kharif season will be 20% of the total crop water requirement.

• For rabi crop 100% of the water requirement is assumed to be met from assured irrigation

• The existing water resource potential has been calculated by combining the water requirements for both kharif and rabi crops, water utilised for domestic and livestock purposes, water consumed by cottage, heavy and power generation industries, etc. Calculated per annum basis.

• For estimation of projected crop water demand for the year 2021, the present irrigation crop water demand ( 2015 value)was multiplied by a factor of 1.1365 (as the agricultural growth rate for five years is 13.65% as per the estimate of Planning Commission, Government of India).

• For estimation of projected livestock water demand by the year 2021, a

factor of 1.15 is multiplied to present (2015) livestock water demand.

Rationale/Justification Irrigation is one of the most important critical input in agriculture which has the potential to enhance crop production and productivity by more than 45 % alone. Hence, there is a need to increase the irrigation potential of cropped area to obtain higher crop production and income from agriculture sector. The Prime Minister Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY) is such initiative floated by the Government of India to improve the irrigation potential of the districts in India by converging the resources of different government departments and focusing on infrastructure creations in agricultural sector to enhance livelihood security of the farming people.

The present irrigated area of Boudh district of the state of Odisha is 35% while the rain 65% of the total cropped area (1,32,780 ha ). The rain fed areas are subjected to high risk of crop production. Substantial dependency on monsoon rainfall makes cultivation in un-irrigated areas a high risk, less productive farming profession. To make the farming a profitable enterprise and to provide substantial employment opportunities to the future 16

generation for their sustainable livelihood security, promotion of assured irrigation system is a viable option. Empirical evidences suggest that assured or protective irrigation encourages farmers to invest more in farming technology and inputs leading to productivity enhancement and increased farm income.

The overreaching vision of PMKSY will be to ensure access to some means of assured irrigation to all farming community in the district, to produce ‘per drop more crop’ thus bringing much desired rural prosperity. As per the guideline of PMKSY, DLIC is to prepare a perspective and strategic plan for irrigation facilities development in the district based on the priorities of the blocks and indicate implementation strategy and expected outputs/outcomes, financial outlays and approach. The detailed strategic plan of Boudh district has been prepared based on the objectives, thrusts and approaches of PMKSY.

The strategic approach in preparing district irrigation plan for Boudh district of the state of Odisha has been to enhance the irrigated area from present level of 35% to 56%, registering an increase of 21% over the existing irrigated area (46570 ha). To achieve the proposed target by the end of 2021, the DIP has emphasised to convert 29000 ha of rain fed area to irrigated area by an estimated expenditure of Rs. 814.741crore spread over 5 years period from 2016-17 to 2020-21.

CHAPTER-I GENERAL INFORMATION OF THE DISTRICT 1.1. District Profile

The Boudh district presents a panorama of many millennia in the human history. It occupies a unique position being endowed with lush green vegetation, different fauna and rich cultural heritage. The district is separated from Phulbani district which was called Bauda- Phulabani earlier. Mostly the Southern part of the district is bestowed with dense forest. Boudh district was formed on 2 nd January 1994. The Boudh district is bounded by River Mahanadi & Angul district to the North, Kandhamal district to the South, Nayagarh district to the East and River Tel and Subarnapur district to the West, covering a geographical area of 3098 sq km (1.99% of the state), the district lies between 20 0 22’ N to 20 0 50’ North Latitude and 83 0 34’E to 84 049’ East longitude (Table 1.1). The district code is 391.

The district consists of only one Sub-Division i.e. Boudh and three Blocks, viz. Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal with district headquarters at Boudh. There is no municipality area in the district. There are 3 Tehsils, 1 NAC, 6 Police Stations, 63 Grampanchayats and 1186 villages. There are 2 Fire Stations and 1 no, of Assembly Constituency in the district. The block codes of Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal blocks are 0233, 0234 and 0232, respectively. The geographical locations of the blocks are given in Table 1.1.

Fig. 1.1.1. District Map of Boudh

Table 1.1. District Profile of Boudh

SL. DISTRICT DISTRICT LATITUDE LONGITUDE NO. CODE

1 BOUDH 391 20°22’ to 20°50’ N 83°34’ to 84°49’ E

BLOCK WISE SL. BLOCK BLOCK CODE LATITUDE LONGITUDE NO. 1 Boudh 0233 20° 49' 42.4056'' N 84° 19' 37.6716'' E

2 Harabhanga 0234 20° 37' 25.8744'' N 84° 36' 26.4744'' E

3 Kantamal 0232 20° 39' 37.3788'' N 83° 44' 39.0984'' E

Source; DDA ,Boudh

The Boudh district is concerned with the native rulers of Boudh. Raja Jogindar Dev was benevolent and generous and introduced the english education in the state. During his regime, Boudh has made a considerable progress in the field of modern education and culture. His sudden death in 1913, resulted in numerous uprising of rebellions throughout the district, which was successfully suppressed by Raja Narayan Dev. Raja Narayan Dev was the last ruler of Boudh District, when it was merged with Odisha province on 1 st January 1948. Finally in 1994, the Boudh was raised to the status of a separate functioning district on 2 nd January 1994. There are many festivals in the Boudh District that are celebrated by total population of Boudh with great enthusiasm and faith. Festivals like Chuda Khai Jatra, Ratha Yatra, Laxmi Puja, Nuakhai, Shivaratri, Dasahara, Dola Jatra, Puajiuntia and Bhaijiuntia, Ramaleela, Kailashi Jatra, Christmas, Id–Ul–Fitre are the important festivals of the District.

Out of the total geographical area of 3,10,000 ha in the district, the area under forest is 1, 12,771 ha. Which is 36% of the total area. The forest produce of economic importance in the district are Bamboo, Kendu leaves, Mahua Flowers/Seeds, Siali leaves, Timber, Fire wood, Myrabolam, Gendulingama and Tamarind. Over the years, the forest suffered serious 19

depletion due to relentless pressure arising due to increasing demand for fuel wood, fodder and timber.

Table 1.1.1. Forest Area of the District

Sl. No Type Area in Sq. Kms.

1 Total Forest Area 1277.17

2 Reserved Forest 983.33

3 Demarcated Forest 43.48

4 Other Forests 249.34

5 Un-demarcated Protected Forest 0.00

6 Un Classified Forest 1.02

7 Forest Division 1 [Boudh]

Fig.1.1.2 Forest Area of the District

Fig. 1.1.3 Map of Reserve Forest Area 21

The district is mostly rural in character having 1186 villages without any municipality and one NACs. Increasing urbanisation has contributed in developing township in the district falling under three Tahasils. The district is having one town i.e. Boudhin the district. The district head quarter is Boudh. Detail administrative set-up of the district is reflected in the following table.

Table 1.1.2 Administrative Set-up of Boudh District

Geographical Area 3,09,800 ha

Geographical Location Latitude – 20º.22’ to 20º.50’-N Longitude – 83º.34’ to 84º.49’-E Geographical Boundary North- River Mahandai & Angul Dist. South- Kandhamala Dist. East- Nayagarh Dist. West- River Tel & Subarnapur Dist. Number of Sub-Division 1 (Boudh)

No. of Municipalities / Corporation 0

Number of Blocks 3[Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal ]

Number of N.A.Cs. 1 ( Boudh) No.of Wards - 17

Number of Tahasils 3 ( Boudh,Harabhanga,Kantamal)

Number of Police Stations 6 (Boudh,Manamunda,Harabhanga,Kantamal, Bousuni and Purunakatak) No. of Registration Offices 2 ( Boudh & Kantamal) No. of Treasuries 2 ( Boudh & Kantamal) Number of Gram Panchayats 63 No. of Inhabited Villages 1115 No. of Uninhabited Villages 71 Total Number of villages 1186 [Inhabited - 1115,Uninhabited -71] Fire Stations 4 (Boudh,Charichhak, Baunsuni and Kantamal)

No. of Jails 1 (Boudh) No. of Assembly Constituencies 2 ( 85-Kantamal ,86-Boudh) Source: http://ordistricts.nic.in/district_profile/dist_glance.php

1.2. Demography As per census 2011, Boudh had population of 419343 of which male and female are 210036 and 209605, respectively. In 2001 census, Boudh had a population of 373,372 of which male population was 188,155 while female population was 185,217. The Boudh district population constituted 1.05 percent of total Odisha population. In 2001 census, this figure for Boudh district was at 1.01 percent. There was net addition of 18.16 percent population compared to 2001 census. The population density of Boudh during 2011 census was 142 people per sq. km. in comparison to 121 persons/ sq. km during 2001. Average literacy rate of Boudh in 2011 is 71.61 compared to 57.73 of 2001. If things are looked out at gender wise, male and female literacy are 83.34 and 59.79 respectively. Total literate in Boudh District are 271,612 of which male and female are 158,648 and 112,964, respectively.

Table . 1.2. Demographic Situation of Boudh District

Population SC ST General Total No of Code of Name of GPs/ Villages No of No of No of No of the Block Villages No of No of No of No of Covered M F CH* Total house house house house Covered Members Members Members Members hold hold hold hold

22 Boudh 71972 72450 144124 5717 34301 3002 18015 15302 91807 24021 144124 (415)

18 Harbhanga 63826 63008 126834 5031 30186 2642 15854 13465 80793 21138 126834 (362)

23 Kantamal 74238 74147 148385 5886 35316 3092 18548 15753 94521 24731 148385 (409)

63 TOTAL 210036 209605 419343 16634 99803 8736 52417 34887 267121 69890 419343 (1186)

The figures in parenthesis is the number of villages Source: District Planning Officer, Boudh, Census- 2011 24

Fig. 1.2.1. Block wise total population 25

Fig.1.2.2. Block wise and caste wise population classification

Fig. 1.2.3. Block wise household and family members

The SC and ST population accounts for 23.7% and 12.4 %, respectively of the total population as given in Table 1.2. The population density in the village area is 225/sq. km. The scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population is high in Kantamal block. The higher number of villages (415) is in Boudh block while the higher number of gram panchayats (23) is in Kantamal block. The sex ratio of the district is for every 1000 males the female population is 992. The average literacy rate of Boudh is 71.61 % during 2011 Census as compared to 57.73 % during 2001. The male and female literacy is 83.34 % and 59.79 %, respectively.

As per 2011 census, 95.37 % population of Boudh district lives in villages. The total population living in rural areas is 420,738 of which males and females are 211,133 and 209,605, respectively. In rural areas, the sex ratio is 993 females per 1000 males. The child sex ratio is 979 girls per 1000 boys. The child population in the age group 0-14 is 59,737 in rural areas of which males were 30,184 and females were 29,553. The child population comprises 14.30 % of the total rural population of the district.

Fig. 1.2.4. The Population growth Trend of Boudh District (1901-2011) 28

1.3. Biomass and Livestocks

The animal husbandry and dairy development have recognized as an important economic activities of the populace of Boudh district. Next to agriculture, livestock is the second most important income generation activities for the farmers. The back yard poultry is very relevant mainly for small, marginal and landless farmers. The rearing of goat, sheep and pigs are traditional activities of OBC, SC and ST population of the district. This sector provides ample employment opportunities and livelihood options to small, marginal and landless farmers who mostly rear small ruminant animals for their pittance.

Table 1.3. Block Wise Biomass and Livestock Data of the District

Sl. Small Animals Large Animals Draft Animal Any Other (Buffalo /Yak Animal Indescript Block Hybrid Hybrid Milch / / Bulls/ Poultry Ducks (Nos.) Goats Sheep Indigenious ive No. Cows Buffalo Meat Any Other) (No.) (No.) Pigs (Nos.) (Nos.) Cows (Nos.) Buffalo (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.)

33 (in 1 Boudh 32,836 1095 NAC) 29,879 36,134 18,956 1935 4954 nil nil nil only

Harabhang 2 20,200 1200 150 26,881 19,364 28,266 1841 7047 nil nil nil a

3 Kantamal 50,550 992 100 38,884 28,550 17,245 2977 4663 nil nil nil

Total - 103,586 3,287 283 95,644 84,048 64,467 6,753 16,664

Source: CDVO,Boudh

Fig. 1.3.1. Block wise Small Animal Distribution

Fig. 1.3.2. Block wise Distribution of Cattle Population

The Table 1.3 shows that the total population of the livestock’s in the district is 374732 of which the small ruminant population is 179975, cattle population is 87884 and the poultry bird population is 106873. There is large scope for expansion of livestock’s in the district as the forest area is comparatively high. The small ruminate animals can provide livelihood support to small and marginal farmers, considerably.

The district is having 7 Dispensaries, 28 Live Stock Aid Centres (2014-15) and 82 Artificial Insemination Centres which provides insemination facilities to the livestock rearing families. Apart from this, the district is also having 40 Integrated Livestock Development Centre (ILDC) sponsored by a NGO named JK Trust. The district is having 5 numbers of Cattle Development Centre (CDC) of managed by a NGO named BAIF. The milk production and productivity in the district is low due to presence higher number of indigenous cattle whose productivity is less than cross breed /exotic cattle.

Table 1.3.1. The Different Veterinary Institutions in the District

Institutions Boudh Kantamal Harabhanga Total Vety. Disp. 3 2 2 7

Livestock Aid Center 10 11 7 28

Cattle Development center (CDC) BAIF 2 2 1 5 Integrated Livestock Development Center(ILDC) 18 13 9 40 JK Trust Gomitra 3 2 4 9

Total Institutions 35 29 23 87

Non AI Center 3 1 1 5

Total AI Center 32 28 22 82

New LAC 3 4 4 11

Fig. 1.3.3. Veterenary Institutions in Boudh Block

1.4. Agro Ecology, Climate, Hydrology and Topography Phytogeographically, the vegetation of Boudh district comes under two major divisions, Northern tropical semi-evergreen forest and Northern tropical moist deciduous forest. The Boudh district comes under West Central Table Land Agro Climatic Zone of the state. The district has uneven and hilly terrain with geographical area is 309800 ha. The climate of this district is sub-tropical, hot dry in summer, cold dry in winter, cool and humid during rainy season. In summer the temperature rises up to 45 0 C, in winter it falls to 10 0 C. December is the coldest month in the year and May is the hottest month. The rainfall is erratic with uneven distribution resulting drought or flood condition. The monsoon breaks in the middle of June and completely ends in mid-October, causing heavy downpour in July and August. The normal rainfall of this district is 1623.10 mm (Table 1.4.). The district is covered under one agro climatic zone and two agro-ecological situations as indicated below:

Table1.4. Agro Ecology, Climate, Hydrology and Topographic Situations of Boudh

o Sl. Name Maximum rainfall Average weekly temperature ( c) Potential evapo- Elevation No. of intensity (mm) transpiration (pet) block Up Beyo Beyon Period Period Mi Max Mea to 15 nd 15 d 30 n n min but but up

up to to 60 Summer Winter Rainy (mm) (mm) 30 min (april - may) (oct - mar) (june - sept)

Type ofType terrain min Block (ha.) area

Winter No. Of (no) rainy days Cumulative total Summer Min Min Min Min Min Average rainfallmonthly Max Max Max Max Max Agro ecologicalAgro zone type Mean Mean Mean Mean Rainy Rainy season Normal annual(mm) rainfall 1 BOUDH Western Uneven 309,800 1623.10 135.26 68.10 221 232 268mm 25C 45C 10C 35C 10C 45C 6-9 mm 2-3 1-2 10-11 Central & hilly mm mm mm mm mm Table terrain Land Source: KVK, Boudh

Table 1.4.1. ACS and AES of Boudh District

Sl. No Agro-climatic Zone Agro-ecological situations Blocks covered Broad Soil groups

1 Western Central Table Land Plain land irrigated Boudh Red and Yellow, Red & Black, Black, Brown Forest, Lateritic 2 Plateau rainfed Harabhanga 3 Plain land rainfed Kantamal Source: KVK, Boudh 36

The Table 1.4 shows that the monthly average rainfall of the district is 135.26 mm with 68.10 numbers of rainy days per year. The maximum rainfall intensity upto 15 minutes is 221 mm, beyond 15 minutes but upto 30 minutes is 232 mm and beyond 30 minutes but upto 60 minutes is 268 mm. The average weekly maximum temperature in summer season (April-May) 450 C and minimum temperature is 25 0 C. During winter season (October-March) the maximum weekly temperature is 35 0 C and minimum temperature is 10 0 C. During rainy season (June- September) the maximum and minimum weekly temperature is 45 0 C and 10 0 C, respectively. The potential evapo- transpiration (PET) for summer, winter and rainy seasons are 6-9 mm, 2-3 mm and 1-2 mm, respectively. The cumulative annual PET for the district is 10-11 mm.

Table- 1.4.2. Block Wise Monthly Rainfall Data of the Year 2014-15 in mm.

S.No Block Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 1 Boudh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.00 34.20 470.40 479.00 357.30 65.30 0.00 0.00 2 Kantamal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143.00 57.00 993.90 549.30 327.20 22.20 0.00 0.00 3 Harabhanga 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.40 18.20 543.70 347.60 344.40 85.80 0.00 0.00 Total (District) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 376.40 109.4 2008 1375.9 1028.9 173.3 0.0 0.0 Source: DDA,Boudh

Fig. 1.4.1. Rainfall trend of Boudh District from 2006-2015

Most part of the district has black alluvial soil. The district Boudh covers fertile plains and hilly zones. This area consists of a long strip of level land running parallel to the Mahanadi. Many small streams, tributary rivers, fountain (locally called jhor ) find their way to the Mahanadi. The river line plains of Boudh are drained by the tributaries of the Mahanadi while the southern and the western region are drained by the tributaries of the Tel. The referring blocks of Kantamal, Boudh and Harbhanga is full of black alluvial soil which is most fertile due to deposit of salt. Out of 3 blocks, 2 blocks have plain lands and one block has got mixture of plain and hilly ranges.

1.5. Soil Profile

The major soil class of the district is mixed grey soil (inceptisols) with an area of 275453.29 ha followed by black soil with more clay content (vertisol). The other soil classes are entisols (unaltered soils with coarse parent materials with some unclassified soil (light mud flats).

Table 1.5. Major Soil classes and type of the District and Blocks .

Soil type Land slope Sl. Block Area 0 - 3 % 3 - 8 % 8 - 25 % > 25 % No. Major soil classes (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) 1 Boudh Black soil with more clay 2 4162.11 3821.57 225.19 81.66 0.08 content (vertisols) Mixed grey soil 51065.7 3 88969.29 7199.74 28211.35 1183.67 (inceptisols) 0 Unaltered soils with coarse 4 1309.18 934.10 250.67 113.03 0.00 parent materials (entisols) Unclassified soil( like mud 5 930.20 784.62 35.51 flats) 6 Waterbody 4622.34 7 Habitation 142.46 100135.5 8 Total 8 9 Harabhanga Black soil with more clay 10 3456.30 3238.07 71.07 27.29 content (vertisols) Mixed grey soil 104837.8 35160.2 13261.3 11 51267.31 4221.61 (inceptisols) 0 3 4 Unaltered soils with coarse 12 2870.61 1476.05 759.96 623.19 2.98 parent materials (entisols) Unclassified soil( like mud 13 1635.46 1257.45 158.03 17.10 flats) 14 Waterbody 4621.48 15 Habitation 380.50 117802.1 16 Total 4 17 Kantamal Black soil with more clay 18 4408.69 4104.39 147.56 62.34 content (vertisols) Mixed grey soil 57100.9 19 81646.56 7341.55 15801.78 290.73 (inceptisols) 1 Unaltered soils with coarse 20 2163.58 1749.16 310.74 101.96 parent materials (entisols) Unclassified soil( like mud 21 270.19 208.48 46.45 flats) 22 Waterbody 3165.88 23 Habitation 207.36 24 Total 91862.28

Source: P.D, Watershed, Boudh

The percentage of insceptisols (Mixed grey soil ) is more in Harbhanga Block (88.99% ) followed by Kantamal (88.87%and Boudh (88.84%). The percentage of vertisols is more in Kantamal ( 4.7%) followed by Boudh ( 4.15%) and lowest is in Harbhanga Block (2.93%) . But the area under entsols (Unaltered soils with coarse parent materials) is more in Harbhanga Block (2870.61 ha ) followed by Kantamal (2163.58ha ) and Boudh (1309.18ha) . The water body in Boudh and Harbhanga are approximately equal.

The soil of the district is mostly black alluvial and is generally fertile with low status of nitrogen and available Phosphorus at certain places. The revering blocks of Kantamal, Boudh and Harbhanga is full of black alluvial soil which is most fertile due to deposit of silt (Fig. 1.5.6, 1.5. and 1.5.8) . Out of 3 blocks, 2 blocks have plane lands and one block has the combination of plane and hilly ranges. The soil of the district has high moisture retention capacity.

Fig. 1.5.1. Soil Classification Map of Boudh

Table 1.5.1. Soil types in Boudh

Sl. Soil type Characteristics Area (000ha) No 1 Black soil Clay loam 96.1

2 Mixed red & black Sandy clay loam 164.3

3 Red soil Sandy loam 49.6

Fig. 1.5.2. The Soil Status in Boudh

The soils are mostly acidic in nature and some part of district has neutral soil. The availability of Phosphorous (P) and Potash (K) in soils are high whereas the Nitrogen status is medium in two blocks except Kantamal block. The status of Nitrogen is low in Kantamal block but with more phosphorous and potash content

Table 1.5.2. The block wise soil reaction and fertility status in percent

S. Name of Soil Reaction Fertility Index No Block Acid Normal Alkaline N P K

1 Boudh 89% 11% - 1.18 1.43 1.32 2 Harabhanga 70% 30% - 1.27 1.54 1.23 3 Kantamal 90% 10% - 1.16 1.70 1.59

Fig. 1.5.3. Land Slope Classification of Boudh Block

Fig. 1.5.4. Land Slope Classification of Harabhanga Block

Fig. 1.5.5. Land Slope Classification of Kantamal Block

Fig. 1.5.6.Soil Classification of Boudh Block

Fig. 1.5.7.Soil Classification of Harabhanga Block

Fig. 1.5.8. Soil Classification of Kantamal Block

The Table 1.5 shows the land slopes of different blocks of Boudh district. The land slope with 0-3% for mixed grey soil is highest in Kantamal block with coverage area of 57100.91 ha followed by Boudh with 51065.70 ha and lowest in Harabhanga block (35160.23 ha.). The vertisol in t6he corresponding slopes is highest in Kantamal block (4104.39 ha.) followed by Boudh (3821.57 ha.) and lowest in Harabhanga (3238. 07 ha.). The land slope 3-8 % covers highest area in Harabhanga block (13261.34 ha) followed by Kantamal block (4341.55 ha.). The Harabhanga block also has land slope 8-25% and more than 25% with corresponding area of 5127.31 ha and 4221.61 ha, respectively (Fig. 1.5.3, 1.5.4 and 1.5.5).

1.6. Soil Erosion and Runoff Status

Table 1.6. Soil Erosion and Run Off Status of the Boudh District

Runoff Name Name of Total Time of return of Soil Frequen of sediment Peak runoff maximum flood Sl. Longi erosion cy of Drought micro monitori Latitude rate volume No tude (tone / peak frequency water ng (cum / of rainy In ha) (no. In 5 10 shed station hr) season months) years years years (ha-m)

Data not available

1.7. Land Use Pattern

The table 1.7 indicates that the Kantamal block is having highest geographical area (35.1%) followed by Harabhanga (35%) and then Boudh (29.80%). Forest area is 51% of total geographical area. Around 37% of the total forest land is found in Kantamal block which is maximum followed by Boudh and Harabhanga. Cropping Intensity is maximum in Harabhanga (169%) and the cropping intensity of the district is 146 %. The total geographical area of Boudh district is 310 thousand ha. Of which the block wise distribution of Boudh, Harabhanga and Kantamal block is 101.496, 102.076 and 106.428 thousand ha., respectively (Table 1.7 and Fig. 1.7.1., 1.7.2 and 1.7.3). The area under forest land is 182.995 thousand ha. which is 51.21% of total geographical area. The area under waste land is 2.04% of the total geographical land.

Table 1.7. Land Use Pattern of Boudh District (Area in thousand ha.)

Area Under Agriculture Total Area Area Area Gram Villages Geograp Area Under Under Block Gross Net Sown Under Panchayat Covered hical Crop Waste Other Cropped Sown More Forest Area Intensity land Uses Area Area Than Once

Boudh 21 384 101.496 49.696 32.396 14.300 153% 62.966 0.372 10.762

Harabhanga 18 340 102.076 42.662 25.207 14.455 169% 50.816 3.323 45.730

Kantamal 24 393 106.428 40.422 27.577 10.621 146% 69.213 3.612 25.318

Total 63 1117 310 132.78 85.180 39.376 182.995 7.307 81.810

Source: DDA,Boudh

Fig. 1.7.1. Land Utilisation Pattern of the Boudh District

Fig. 1.7.2. Land Use Pattern of Boudh Block( Area in thousand Ha. )

Fig. 1.7.3. Land Use Pattern of Harabhanga Block (Area in thousand Ha. )

Fig. 1.7.4. Land Use Pattern of Kantamal Block (Area in thousand Ha.)

CHAPTER-II

DISTRICT WATER PROFILE

A scarce natural resource, water is fundamental to life, livelihood, food security and sustainable development. The National Water Policy (2002) document very categorically states that water is a prime natural resource, a basic human need and a precious national asset. It further states that it is one of the most crucial elements in developmental planning. Agricultural sector in India in general and in Odisha in particular has been and is likely to remain the major use of water. Undoubted, irrigation has been one of the pillars of green revolution and key factor in imparting resilience and drought proofing to agriculture.

Realizing the importance of the water resources and the role, it would play in enhancing agricultural production in a sustainable manner, Government has developed irrigation resources. The district water profile particularly for agricultural use for raising different crops are presented in this section. Understanding the area under irrigated by different crops provides making strategies for efficient utilization of scare water resources for bringing rainfed areas under irrigation

The principal rivers are the Mahanadi and Tel, which flow around the North Western side bordering Kantamal, Boudh and Harbhanga Blocks, and few small rivers such as Sunamodi, Salur, Khadog and Bagh are originated from the hilly regions of Kandhamal district and flow towards Boudh district and meet with Mahanadi and Tel river. Major portion of this district is flood prone as many rivers pass through this district. The different rivers flowing within the district is given in the map below.

Table 2.1. Area Wise Crop Wise Irrigation Status

Summer Total Horticulture & plantation Kharif (area in ha) Rabi (area in ha) (area in ha) (area in ha) crops (area in ha) Crop type Irrg Rainfed Total Irrg Rainfed Total Irrg Rainfed Total Irrg. Rainfed Total Irrigated Rainfed Total

A) Cereals 24410 41570 65980 2290 0 2290 0 0 0 26700 41570 68270 B) Coarse Cerels 500 30 530 80 0 80 0 0 0 580 30 610 C) Pulses 0 13950 13950 980 22460 23440 0 0 0 980 36410 37390 D) Oilseeds 660 2490 3150 1560 2170 3730 0 0 0 2220 4660 6880 E) Fibres 0 250 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 250 F) Vegetables 5100 3290 8390 9050 0 9050 0 0 0 14150 3290 17440 G) Spices &condiments 910 0 910 990 0 990 0 0 0 1900 0 1900 H) Others 0 0 0 40 0 40 0 0 0 40 0 40 I) Mango 2545 0 2545 J) Banana 287 0 287 K) Cashew 0 774 774 L) Citrus 0 297 297 M) Sapta 0 10 10 N) Guava 0 232 232 O) Pineapple 8 0 8 P) Coconut & Papaya 471 0 471

Total 31580 61580 93160 14990 24630 39620 0 0 0 46570 86210 132780 3311 1313 4624

Source: DDA & ADH, Boudh

Table 2.1 shows that the irrigation percentage of Boudh district is 35% while the rainfed area is 65% of the total cultivable area (132780 ha). The Kharif season irrigated area is 46570ha which is 65.67% of the total area covered for cultivation. During Rabi season the irrigated area is 16115 ha which is 37.42% of the total land covered under cultivation. The district does not take any crop during summer season due to lack of assured irrigation during the season. The horticultural and plantation crops are taken in 4624 ha of land of which assured irrigation is provided to 71.60% of horticultural crops.

Substantial investments have been made over the plan period for construction of irrigation infrastructure and creation of irrigation potential in the district. The district has about 51.54 percent land are irrigated . Many major, medium and minor irrigation projects have been constructed during the plan period in the district. To create additional irrigation facilities, the Agriculture Department provided subsidy to farmers for digging of bore wells, dug wells and purchase of pump sets etc. Scrutiny revealed that 18 bore wells, 65 dug wells and 2077 pump sets were provided during 2007-12 to the farmers at subsidized cost. Boudh district is rich in both groundwater and surface water resources. The groundwater utilisable resource for irrigation use is at 35618 ha, annual draft for irrigation use is 4938 ha. The current level of exploitation of groundwater potential is only 15.6% of the utilizable recharge as against state average of 18.3%.

Table 2.1.1. Source wise Area Irrigated (Area in hectares) of the Year 2014-15

Dug/ Tube / Lift Medium Minor Total Block Bore Wells Irrigation Nos. Area Nos. Area Nos. Area Nos. Area Area

Boudh 1181 796 147 3366 2 14884 21 2695 22489

Harabhanga 1494 904 137 2737 1 6989 26 7063 18464

Kantamal 1607 1158 206 5354 1 6853 27 3970 17896

Total 4282 2858 490 11457 4 28726 74 13728 58849 Source: Irrigation Dept.,Boudh

Among the different Kharif crops, the upland rice is most affected by drought. Therefore, diversified land use with low duty non-paddy crops is the best option in these lands. The technology so far available to mitigate drought are mostly preventive in “nature and requires early planning. The age-old adage “Prevention is better than cure” thus holds good in drought management. Therefore, it is imperative to have a long-term policy and planning at the beginning of the season for judicious use of water, land and crops in a particular locality for best results. The major thrust in drought mitigation in rain fed areas should be on rainwater management through in- situ conservation and water harvesting through on-farm reservoirs capturing runoff and flash flood to recycle at the time of need.

Fig. 2.1.1. Block wise Irrigated Area

2.2. Production and Productivity of Major Crops The area under cereals ,coarse cereals, pulses, oilseeds, fibres, vegetables, spices constitute 68270ha,610ha, 37310ha, 6880ha, 250ha, 17440 ha and 1900ha, respectively in the district. The paddy area in the district covers 59335 ha. The total fruit area in the district 4393ha. The major crop of the district is paddy. The total production of rainfed paddy is 20742.65 MT whereas irrigated paddy is 212910.96MT.

The productivity of rainfed paddy and irrigated paddy in kharif season is 27.54qt/ha and 41.75qt/ha respectively as compared with the average productivity of paddy is 39.92qt/ha. The productivity of irrigated paddy in rabi season is 45.37qt/ha.

Table 2.2.1 shows that mango is the major fruit crop of the district followed by banana and lemon. The climate is conducive for fruits and vegetables. Other crops like onion has high potential for promotion in the district. More area to be covered under onion, mango and banana in all three blocks. Table. 2.2.3. shows that during 2012-13 and 2013-14 maximum area covered under Banana, Potato, Tomato and onion in the district is less during the year 2015-16.

Table 2.2. Production and Productivity of Major Crops

Crop Sown Rainfed - Paddy Irrigated-Paddy Total

Produ Sl. Name of Product Cost of Cost of Produc Cost of Season ctivity No. the Block Coarse Oil Veget Oth Area Prod. in ivity in cultivati Area Prod. in cultivati Area Prod. in tivity cultivati Cereals Pulses Fibres Spices in Cerals seeds ables ers (Ha) MT Qtls/ on on (ha) MT on on (Ha) MT in Qtls/ on on Qtls/ Hect Rs/Ha Rs./Ha Hect. Rs./Ha Hect.

1 Boudh Kharif 26480 100 4825 915 95 2748 430 0 2484 7265.70 29.25 23500 20796 90150.66 43.35 23500 23280 97416 41.85 23500

Rabi 777 55 8168 920 0 4409 260 15 0 0.00 0 23500 277 1256.20 45.35 23500 277 1256.2 45.35 23500

2 Harabhanga Kharif 18690 205 4855 1950 45 2320 380 0 314 863.50 27.5 23500 15176 60172.84 39.65 23500 15490 61036 39.40 23500

Rabi 753 75 8217 1269 0 3377 343 15 0 0.00 0 23500 253 1132.18 44.75 23500 253 1132.2 44.75 23500

3 Kantamal Kharif 20810 90 5110 1285 90 1580 233 0 4733 12613.45 26.65 23500 15027 62587.46 41.65 23500 19760 75201 38.06 23500

Rabi 760 85 6215 541 0 3006 254 10 0 0.00 0 23500 275 1263.63 45.95 23500 275 1263.6 45.95 23500

TOTAL Kharif 65980 395 14790 4150 230 6648 1043 0 7531 20742.65 27.54 23500 50999 212910.96 41.75 23500 58530 233654 39.92 23500

Rabi 2290 215 22600 2730 0 10792 857 40 0 0 23500 805 3651.995 45.37 23500 805 3652 45.37 23500

G, Total 68270 610 37390 6880 230 17440 1900 40 7531 - - - 51804 59335

Source: DDA & ADH, Boudh

Table. 2.2.1: The Production and Productivity of Major Horticultural Crops During 2015

SI. District Season Crop Sown Rainfed Irrigated Total No

ya) Sapta Citrus Guava Guava Others Others Cost of Cost of Mango Mango Cost of Banana Cashew Cashew Papa on Rs/Ha (ha) Area Area Area (Ha) Area Area (Ha) on on Rs./Ha on on Rs./Ha Pineapple cultivation cultivation cultivation Prod.in MT Prod.in MT Prod.in MT (Coconut & in in Qtls/Hect Productivity Productivity Productivity Productivity Productivity in Qtls/Hect. in Qtls/Hect. in Qtls/Hect. in Qtls/Hect. 1 Boudh 2545 774 287 297 10 232 8 471 1313 558.05 7.21 46951 3311 715.25 9.241 114354 4624 1273.3 8.23 114354

Source: ADH, Horticulture, Boudh

Table. 2.2.2. Area, Production and Yield of Major Horticulture Crops During 2013

Sl. Area Production Yield t/ha Block Crop No Irrigated % Rain fed % Total Irrigated % Rain fed % Total Irrigated Rain- fed Average 1 Boudh Mango -- -- 1370 Ha 100 1370 Ha -- -- 3205.8 MT 3205.8 MT -- 2.34 MT 2.34 MT 2 Kantamal Mango -- -- 1400 Ha 100 1400 Ha -- -- 3276 MT 3276 MT -- 2.34 MT 2.34 MT 3 Harabhanga Mango -- -- 1341 Ha 100 1341 Ha -- -- 3137.94 MT 3137.94 -- 2.34 NT 2.34 MT 4 Boudh Bananana 120 Ha 100 -- -- 120 Ha 28 MT ------28MT MT 0.23 MT -- 0.23 MT 5 Kantamal Bananana 75 Ha 100 -- -- 75 Ha 17.5 MT ------17.5 MT 0.23 MT -- 0.23 MT 6 Harabhanga Bananana 100 Ha 100 -- -- 100 Ha 23.3MT ------23.3MT 0.23 MT -- 0.23 MT 7 Boudh Onion 446 Ha 100 -- -- 446 Ha 6338 MT ------6338 MT 14.21 MT -- 14.21 MT 8 Kantamal Onion 150Ha 100 -- -- 150Ha 2131 MT ------2131 MT 14.20 MT -- 14.20 MT 9 Harabhanga Onion 350 Ha 100 -- -- 350 Ha 4969 MT ------4969 MT 14.19 MT -- 14.19 MT

Source: ADH, Boudh

Table 2.2.3. Area, Production and Productivity Trend of Main Crops in the District

(Area – ha, Production–q, productivity –q/ha)

2012-13(Actual) 2013-14 (Actual) 2014-15 (Actual) 2015-16 (Projected) 2016-17 (Projected) Name Sl. of the No. Crop A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y

62 1 Banana 234 53.55 0.22 295 68.8 0.23 274 0.22 300 67.88 0.22 350 79.20 0.22

2 Potato 157 6497 41.38 175 1324.63 7.56 361 10362 28.70 400 11488 28.70 450 12916.62 28.70

3 Tomato 1950 19145 9.81 2100 21452 10.21 2376 32884 13.84 2500 34600 13.84 2550 35292.17 13.84

4 Onion 890 12646 14.20 920 1063.74 1.15 946 13443 14.21 1000 14210 14.21 1050 14920.88 14.21

Source: ADH, Boudh

2.3. Irrigation Based Classification Irrigation is the lifeline for crop production. Massive efforts are geared towards increasing the irrigation potential of the district. This endeavour has resulted in creating a potential of irrigation area of 31580 hectares during Kharif season and 14990hectares during Rabi season. Further, It is proposed to exploit the vast ground and surface water potentials by establishment of more number of shallow tube well, bore wells, dug wells and river/ surface lift points. The Table 2.3 reflects the irrigation sources for the district of Boudh. It is observed that the major, medium and minor irrigation project irrigates 17269 ha, 7336 ha and 14169 ha of land, respectively. The irrigation area covered under lift irrigation is around 9796 ha. The emphasis will be given to enhance the command area under major, medium and minor irrigation projects in Boudh district. There is also great scope to increase area under lift irrigation points as the ground water has not been properly exploited.

Table 2.3. Irrigation Based Classification of Boudh District Irrigated area ( in ha) Rainfed area ( in ha) Partially Un Sl. Gross Net Block / department irrigated / irrigated / No. irrigated irrigated protective totally area area irrigation rainfed 1 Major Irrigation (SIP) 18074.50 a Boudh 10,678 8,995 - b Harabhanga 6,591 4,655 - c Kantamala - - - - Medium Irrigation 2 18434.30 (BAGH) a Boudh 2,039 - b Harabhanga - - - c Kantamala 5297 3297 - 3 Minor Irrigation 18861.20 a Boudh 3,470 2,690 168 b Harabhanga 3438 2063 364 c Kantamala 4,261 2,084 284 4 Lift Irrigation a Boudh 3,228 2,228 - b Harabhanga 3,812 2,812 c Kantamala 3.756 2,756 - - 46570 31580 816 86,210 Source : Irrigation Department, Boudh

CHAPTER III WATER AVAILABILITY Substantial investments have been made over the plan period for construction of irrigation infrastructure and creation of irrigation potential in the district. The district has about 35 percent land are irrigated. Many major, medium and minor irrigation projects have been constructed during the plan period in the district. To create additional irrigation facilities, the Agriculture Department provided subsidy to farmers for digging of bore wells, dug wells and purchase of pump sets etc. The district level data reveal that 18 bore wells, 65 dug wells and 2077 pump sets were provided during 2007-12 to the farmers at subsidized cost. Boudh district is rich in both groundwater and surface water resources.

Table 3.1. Status of Water Availability Sl. No. Sources Kharif Rabi Summer Total Remarks 1 Surface Irrigation (i) Canal (Major Irrigation) (Salki) (ii) Boudh 14995 2850 - 17845 (iii) Harabhanga 6655 1200 - 7855 (iv) Kantamala - - - - (v) Canal (Medium Irrigation) (Bagh) (vi) Boudh - - - - (vii) Harabhanga - - - - 2 Kantamala 12,834 - - 12,834 (i) Minor Irrigation tanks (ii) Boudh 3,286 1015 - 4301 (iii) Harabhanga 4,430 1253 5683 (iv) Kantamala 5,555 1205 6760 (V) Minor Irrigation (Diversion Weir) (VI) Boudh 3,644 32 - 3676 (VII) Harabhanga 6228 117 6345 (IX) Kantamala 2583 - 2583 (X) Lift Irrigation / Diversion (XI) Boudh 5228 5,050 - 10278 (Xii) Harabhanga 5,812 4,220 - 10032 (Xiii) Kantamala 5,472 5,154 - 10626 TOTAL 76722 22096 - 98818 - source : Irrigation Department, Boudh 63

The Table 3.1 shows that the total water available from different sources is 98818 ha. The Salki dam feeds the water to canals under major irrigation project while Bagh dam feed water to canal system in medium irrigation projects. The total irrigation potential of the district is 73.

3.2. Status of Ground Water Availability

Status of block as per CGWB Sl. Ground water (BCM) Block notification No. Critical Semi-critical Safe Draft Recharge Gap

1 BOUDH √√√ 0.0179 0.0769 0.0591

2 HARABHANGA √√√ 0.0181 0.1353 0.1172

3 KANTAMAL √√√ 0.0201 0.0661 0.0460

TOTAL √√√ 0.0561 0.2783 0.2223

Source: P.D., Watershed, Boudh

The Table 3.2 shows that the ground water availability in the three blocks of the district has great potential for exploitation. The ground water status is safe and it is fit for further exploitation. The data shows that the ground water exploitation in the district is 15.34 % against the national average of 18.24%. Hence promotion of lift irrigation points could be taken up in all three blocks for enhancing the area under irrigation.

3.3. Status of Command Area

Information of canal Information on the other Total area command services command Sl. Name of Undeve Devel Undevelo No. the block Total Develop Total Undevelo Developed loped oped ped area ed area area ped area command area area command 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4+7 5+8 1 Boudh 11465 10435 1030 3470 - 3470 10435 4500 2 Harabhanga 8426 7395 1031 7836 7836 7395 8867 3 Kantamal 4261 4261 4261 Total 19891 17830 2061 15567 15567 17830 17628 Source : PD, Watershed, Boudh

The Table 3.3 shows that the total developed command area in the district is 17830 ha while the total undeveloped command area is 17628 ha. The Salki and Bagh river systems passing through the district is presently providing irrigation to mostly Boudh and Harabhanga blocks. The Kantamal block is not connected to any irrigation dams and its canal system. Hence provision to be made to develop minor irrigation projects in Kantamal block.

3.4. Existing Type of Irrigation

The Table 3.4 indicates that there are 393 numbers of government canals having length of 1256.63 km. The total number of community ponds in the district is around 1794 and there are 681 numbers of private ponds. There are 233 numbers of government reservoirs and 36 numbers of diversion weirs existing in the district for providing surface irrigation. There are 49o numbers of government tube wells and 1571 numbers of private tube wells. The district is also having 1787 numbers of open wells, 3564 numbers of government bore wells and 924 numbers of private bore wells for ground water exploitation. There 1050 numbers of traditional WHS/ river lifts for the lift irrigation. There are 4614 numbers of electric pumps for water extraction in the district. For repair and maintenance the proposed budget is 71.28 and 52.5 lakhs for bore wells and river lifts.

Table 3.4 Existing type of irrigation Water extraction Surface irrigation Ground water Total Repair & devices / lift mantainane each Open Canal based Tanks / ponds / reservoirs Tube wells Borewell year (rs) (in lakhs) wells Sources of irrigation from stp

Govt canal no traditional Others Others whs/ river lift lift whs/river Pvt Pvt Pvt Govt Govt Govt

(length in kms) canal dams ponds Diesel pump River lift Bore well Bore well Electricity Electricity pump Irrigationsources Other including sources including smallincluding Individual /Individual pvt Diversion weirs Treated Treated effluent discharged Water extracting Waterunits extracting Govt Govt reservoirs / Community / pvt Community govt / Community ponds Major (SIP) 99 270.23 59 1 60 Boudh 61 158.56 44 1 45 Harabhanga 38 111.67 15 15 Kantamala - - - - Medium (Bagh) Boudh 15 40.05 0 0 Harabhanga 0 - 0 0 Kantamala 62 103.82 1 1 Minor Irrigtion 59 286.15 57 17 74 Boudh 13 52.52 15 6 21 Harabhanga 24 165.41 16 10 26 Kantamala 22 68.22 26 1 27 Lift Irrigation 1782 525 2307 2307 35.64 26.25 Boudh 392 170 562 562 7.84 8.50 Harabhanga 326 148 474 474 6.52 7.40 Kantamala 1064 207 1271 1271 21.28 10.35 TOTAL 393 1256.63 0 0 0 233 36 0 0 0 0 3564 0 1050 0 4614 0 0 269 4614 71.28 52.5 Source: Irrigation Dept , Boudh

CHAPTER IV WATER REQUIREMENT/ DEMAND

4.1. Domestic Water Demand

The total population in 2015 was estimated and was found to be 452480 and the projected population in 2020 would be 507894 and accordingly the gross water demand will be 0.000051. The data in 4.1 revealed highest number of population in Boudh Block in 20015 & 2020 was calculated to be 183348 and 194631 respectively followed by Kantamal (159455, 161909) and lowest in Harbhanga (109677, 151354) . Accordingly the gross water demand in Boudh, Kantamal and Harbhanga will be 0.00002 , 0.000016 and 0.000015, respectively .

Table 4.1. Domestic Water Demand

SL. Population in Projected population Gross water BLOCKS NO. 2015 in 2020 demand (BCM) 1 Boudh 183348 194631 0.00002

2 Harbhanga 109677 151354 0.000015

3 Kantamal 159455 161909 0.000016 Total 452480 507894 0.000051 Source: EE, RWSS, Boudh

Fig. 4.1.1 Domestic Water Demand

4.2. Crop Water Requirement

The Table 4.2 indicated that the total water potential required for the Boudh district would be 8.49 CM. The existing water potential in the district is calculated to be 3.05and accordingly the water potential to be created would be 5.44B CM. The water potential required is calculated to be 3.09, 2.65 and 2.75 for Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal blocks, respectively. The corresponding existing water potential for Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal blocks are calculated to be1.10, 0.90 and 1.05 BCM, respectively. The water potential to be created for Boudh block is calculated to be 1.99 and 1.75,1.70 BCM for Harbhanga and kantamal blocks.

Table. 4.2 Crop Water Requirement

Area Crop Water Existing Water Irrigation Sown water potential water Potential Block Crop Area in in Demand required potential to be Hects. Hects. in mm BCM BCM created Cereals 25557 10073 1250 Coarse Cerals 215 80 500

Pulses 13023 300 350

Oilseeds 1935 868 550 3.09 1.10 1.99 Boudh Fibres 95 0 550 Vegetable 6657 4119 700 Spices 803 596 500 Others 10 10 2000 Total 48295 16736 Cereals 18743 6000 1250 1.75 Coarse Cerals 180 200 500 Pulses 13259 400 350 Oilseeds 2919 660 550 2.65 0.90 Harabhanga Fibres 45 0 550 Vegetable 5697 5442 700 Spices 623 673 500 Others 15 15 2000 Total 41481 13390 Kantamal Cereals 23970 10627 1250 2.75 1.05 Coarse Cerals 215 280 500

Pulses 11108 280 350

Oilseeds 2026 692 550 1.70 Fibres 110 0 550 Vegetable 5086 3889 700

Area Crop Water Existing Water Irrigation Sown water potential water Potential Block Crop Area in in Demand required potential to be Hects. Hects. in mm BCM BCM created Spices 474 631 500 Others 15 15 2000 Total 43004 16444 Cereals 68270 26700 1250 Coarse Cerals 610 580 500

Pulses 37390 980 350

Oilseeds 6880 2220 550 8.49 3.05 5.44 Total Fibres 250 0 550 Vegetable 17440 14150 700 Spices 1900 1900 500 Others 40 40 2000 Total 132780 46570 Source: DDA, Boudh

4.3. Livestock Water Demand

The table 4.3 depicts the livestock water demand for the district of Boudh. The data for the livestock population has been obtained from the Project Director, Watershed Mission Boudh, Govt. Of Orissa. It has been found that the water demand for livestock for Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal block s are 0.00038, 0.000050, 0.0000471 BCM , respectively. The total water requirement for the livestock sector is 0.000901 BCM. The water potential to be created as per the irrigation plan is 0.001411 BCM for the district. The gap of 0.00051 BCM is to be created within the 5 years of plan period in the district for sustainable provision of water for livestock population of the district.

Table 4.3. Livestock Water Demand for the Boudh District

WATER EXISTING TOTAL NO. OF PRESENT WATER WATER DEMAND IN POTENTIAL TO BLOCKS POTENTIAL LIVESTOCK DEMAND (BCM) 2020 (BCM) BE CREATED (BCM) (BCM) 1,25,822(LA- LA-14,21,475lit/day LA-1705770lit/day 24885 SA-6,71,410lit/day SA-805692lit/day BOUDH 0.00038 0.00043 SA-67141 poult.- poult.-10604lit/day Poult.-33931) 8,482,75lit/day 2522066 lit/per day 1,04,949(LA- LA-2451570lit/day LA-20,42,975lit/day 37145 SA-556740lit/day HARABHANGA SA-4,63,950lit/day 0.000471 0.000541 SA-46395 poult.-6420lit/day poult.-5,350lit/day poult.-21400) 3014730 lit/per day LA-1642410lit/day 1,43,961(LA- LA-13,68,675lit/day SA-810408lit/day 24885 KANTAMAL SA-6,75,340lit/day poult.-16108lit/day 0.00038 0.000440 SA-67534 poult.-12,886lit/day 24689261 lit /per poult.-51542) day Total 0.000901 0.001411

Source: CDVO, Boudh

Fig. 4.3.1 Livestock Water Demand for the Boudh District

4.4 Industrial Water Demand The table 4.4 reflects the industrial water demand for the district of Boudh . The district does not have any heavy industries. The nature of industries are mostly limited to fly ash brick making, rice meal, packaging, soft drinks and other trivial industries like ice-cream and hotels. The employment generation in these industries is very limited. The water demand by these industries is also very less. The data on industrial water demand given in Table 4.4, shows that the total industrial water demand is 0.000021. It is predicted that by the year 2020, the total industrial water demand would inflate to 0.000024 BCM. The present water potential is 0.0000117 BCM as per the data given by the District Industrial Corporation , Boudh. Therefore there is a gap of 0.0000096 BCM of water potential which needs to be created for the sustainable supply to the industries by the year of 2020.

Table 4.4 Industrial Water Demand for Boudh District

WATER WATER EXISTING WATER POTENTIAL SL. NAME OF THE DEMAND WATER BLOCKS DEMAN TO BE NO. INDUSTRY IN 2020 POTENTIAL (BCM) CREATED (BCM) (BCM) (BCM) 1 Fly ash brick 0.000018 0.000018 0.0000012 0.0000006 2 Rice mill 0.0000006 0.0000006 0.0000003 0.0000003 Packaged drinking _ 3 0.0000006 0.0000006 0.0000006 BOUDH water 4 Soft drinks 0.0000003 0.0000003 _ 0.0000003 5 Hotel 0.000006 0.000006 0.0000036 0.0000024 6 Ice and ice cream Ind. 0.0000003 0.0000003 _ 0.0000003 7 Rice mill 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000009 0.0000003 8 Fly ash brick 0.0000009 0.0000009 _ 0.0000009 9 KANTAMAL Soft drinks 0.0000003 0.0000003 _ 0.0000003 10 Ice and ice cream Ind. 0.0000003 0.0000003 _ 0.0000003 11 Hotel 0.0000012 0.0000012 _ 0.0000012 12 Rice mill 0.0000021 0.0000021 0.0000018 0.0000003 13 HARABHANGA Fly ash brick 0.0000048 0.0000048 0.000003 0.0000018 14 Cement products 0.0000006 0.0000006 0.0000003 0.0000003 TOTAL 0.000021 0.000024 0.0000117 0.0000096 Source: DIC, Boudh

Fig. 4.4.1 Industrial Water Demand for Boudh District

4.5 Water Demand for Power Generation

The water demand for power generation is given in Table 4.5 . The data shows the Boudh district does not have hydro power generation industry. Therefore water requirement for power generation sector is negligible or nil.

Table. 4.5 . Water Demand for Power Generation

WATER EXISTING POWER WATER WATER POTENTIAL WATER SL. NO. BLOCKS REQUIREMENT, DEMAND DEMAND IN TO BE POTENTIAL MW (BCM) 2020 (BCM) CREATED (BCM) (BCM) 1 Boudh 2 Harbhanga 30 Mw NA NA NA NA 3 Kantamal Source: EE, Electrical, Boudh

4.6. Total Demand of the District for Various Sectors The Table 4.6 depicts the total water demand of the district to be used by various sectors. It has been observed from the above said table that the domestic , crop, livestock and industrial water demand for the district is 0.000051, 8.42, 0.001411 and 0.000021 BCM, respectively. The water requirement for the power generation sector is negligible as there is no hydro power generation industry in the district. The block wise water demand is 3.194 BCM for Boudh, 2.62 BCM for Harbhanga and 2.61 BCM for Kantamal blocks . The total water demand for the district is 8.421 BCM. Table. 4.6 . Total Water Demand of the District for Various Sectors

COMPONENTS SL. TOTAL BLOCKS POWER NO. DOMESTIC CROP LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIAL BCM GENERATION 1 Boudh 0.00002 3.09 0.00043 0.00000096 3.09 2 Harbhanga 0.000015 2.65 0.000541 0.00000039 NA 2.65 3 Kantamal 0.000016 2.75 0.00044 0.00000075 2.75 Total 0.000051 8.49 0.001411 0.000021 8.49

Source: PD, Watershed, Boudh

Fig;4.6.1 Total Water Demand of the District for Various Sectors

4.7. Water Budget

The Table 4.7 depicts the water budget of the district of Boudh. The data shows that the existing water available under surface and ground water is 1.21 and 0.2783 BCM, respectively. The total existing water availability for the district is 1.4883 BCM. The water demand for the present operations which includes domestic, industry, livestock and agriculture is 8.49 BCM. It has been projected that the water demand by the year 2020 is projected to be 9.642 BCM. There is an increase of 13.5% of water potential over the existing status. The gap in water potential in present scenario is 7.00 BCM and by the year 2021 this gap will enhance to 8.152 BCM. Hence there is an urgent need to enhance the water potential for the district.

Table. 4.7. Water Budget

EXISTING WATER WATER DEMAND WATER GAP (BCM) AVAILABILTY (BCM) (BCM) SL. NAME OF TOTAL NO. BLOCKS (BCM) SURFACE GROUND PROJECTED PROJECTED PRESENT PRESENT WATER WATER (2020) (2020)

1 BOUDH 0.37 0.0769 0.4467 3.09 3.511 2.643 3.064

2 HARBHANGA 0.46 0.1353 0.5953 2.65 3.011 2.054 2.415

3 KANTAMAL 0.38 0.0661 0.4461 2.75 3.120 2.303 2.673

TOTAL 1.21 0.2783 1.4883 8.49 9.642 7.00 8.152 Source: PD, Watershed, Boudh

Fig. 4.7.1 Water Budget

CHAPTER- V STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN FOR IRRIGATION IN BOUDH DISTRICT (ODISHA) UNDER PMKSY)

The strategic action plan aims to provide irrigation for higher crop production and productivity in three blocks of Boudh district. The district is having nearly 65% of the Gross Cultivated Area as rain fed area and subjected to high risk in crop production due to extreme weather conditions like drought, flood and other climatic variations. This extreme weather conditions is threatening the livelihood security of rural mass and weakening their socio-economic conditions leading to instability in livelihood generations in agricultural sector. In view of these, providing assured irrigation water to overcome the drought like situation through creation of irrigation infrastructures through District Irrigation Plan formulated by DLIC and TSA through PMKSY.

The present irrigated area of the district is 35 % of the total cultivable area (1,32,780 ha )cultivated area. The strategic approach in DIP planning is to enhance the irrigated area to 56%, an increase of 21% over the existing irrigated area. To achieve the propose target, the DIP has emphasised to convert 29000 ha of rain fed land to irrigated land by an estimated expenditure of Rs. 814 crore spread over 5 years period from 2016-17 to 2020-21. To achieve the propose target, DIP has emphasized to convert 12880 Ha of rainfed to irrigated land by an estimated expenditure of Rs 1531 crore over a period of 20years.

ABSTRACT OF PLAN-A (5 YEARS BUDGET)

Irrigation potential to be created(Ha)

PMKSY AIBP 6400

PMKSY-other components HKBP 2820

WD 2250

Total 11470

State plan Minor 16480

Medium 0

Agriculture 23

NABARD 300

Total

G.total 16803

Extension, Strengthening and Restoraration of Ayacut(Ha)

HKKP RRR 80

Lined channel 1700

Watershed Renovation 950

Total 2730

Drip & Sprinkler Irrigation(Ha)

PDMC Non-DPAP Drip 200

Non-DPAP Sprinkler 400

Total 600

ABSTRACT (5years budget) (Command area & estimated cost scheme wise )

Command Total Name of Area/ Name of the Estimated S No the Component Irrigation scheme Cost Districts Potential (Rs in Lakh) (Ha) 1 BOUDH PMKSY AIBP 6400 4347.00 HAR KHET KO PANI 2820 16911.90 PER DROP MORE 930 7075.80 CROP WATERSHED 2250 10556.00 DEVELOPMENT T0TAL 12400 38890.70 BOUDH Other schemes CONVERGENCE 197 678.40 WITH MGNREGS STATE IRRIGATION 14500 26175.00 PLAN NABARD 300 300.00 OTHER IRRIGATION 2003 15430.00 SCHEMES TOTAL 17000 42583.40 GRAND PMKSY+OTHER 29400 81474.10 TOTAL SCHEMES

ABSTRACT OF PLAN-B (20 YEARS LONGTERM BUDGET)

Command Total Name of Name of Area/ Estimated S No the the Component Irrigation Cost Districts scheme Potential (Rs in Lakh) (Ha) 1 BOUDH LONG LAXMIPATHAR DAM 3880 46120 TERM (1/0.014 SCHEMES SALKI HE(1/1.25MW) 9000 106980

T0TAL 12880 153100

Table. 5.1. PLAN-A: Component 1 Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boud District ( Odisha ) under PMKSY Total Command Name of Total estimated Concerned Area/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise the Blocks/ Number/ cost (Rs in S.No Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation Sub- Capacity lakh ) Department Potential Districts (BCM) ( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Canal Lining of SIP 6 2243.4 307 300 400 300 536.2 1843.2 Boudh MoWR/ AIBP 1 WR(Odisha ) Canal lining of Bagh 6 688.2 80 60 70 80 88 378

M.I (Odisha) Diversion weir 1/0.00456 314 40 40 40 50 40 210

Total 12 3245..6 427 400 510 430 664.2 2431.2

Command Total Name of Total Concerned Area/ estimated the Blocks/ Number/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise S.No Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation cost (Rs in Sub- Capacity Department Potential lakh ) Districts (BCM) ( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 MoWR/ Canal Lining of SIP 4 1495.6 300 300 140 200 288.8 1228.8 Harbhanga WR(Odisha ) AIBP 1 M.I (Odisha) Diversion weir 1/0.0061 425 101 110 120 50 54 435 Total 4 1920.6 401 410 260 250 342.8 1663.8

Command Total Name of Total Concerned Area/ estimated the Blocks/ Number/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise S.No Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation cost (Rs in Sub- Capacity Department Potential lakh ) Districts (BCM) ( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 MoWR/ WR 4 1234.6 50 60 40 60 42 252 Kantamal (Odisha ) AIBP 1 Canal lining of Bagh

Total 4 1234.6 50 60 40 60 42 252 Subtotal AIBP 6400 4347 Component 2 Har Khet Ko Pani Under PMKSY Command Total Total Area/ estimated Name of Concerned Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise Number/ Irrigation cost (Rs in S.No the Blocks/ Ministry/ Component Activitiy Capacity Potential ( lakh ) Sub-Districts Department (BCM) Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

MoWr/Li (Odisha) Lift Irrigation (River Lift ) 50 50 250 200 150 160 240 1000

SC & DW Dept, Ground water Development 150 20 80 60 60 90 110 400 Odisha

RRR Water boies (WHS) 100/0.0013 10 60 80 60 110 90 400 1 Boudh Har Khet Ko Pani

RRR Water boies (Tank) 2/0.0022 10 20 10 15 15 20 80 M.I (Odisha )

Renovation of water bodies 1/0.0038 15 20 20 25 25 30 120

Total - 105 430 370 310 400 490 2000

Total Command Total estimated Name of Concerned Area/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise Number/ cost (Rs in S.No the Blocks/ Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation Capacity lakh ) Sub-Districts Department Potential ( (BCM) Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

MoWr/Li (Odisha) Lift Irrigation (River Lift ) 50 90 200 250 160 150 240 1000

SC & DW Dept, Ground water Development 48 20 40 30 40 60 22 192 Odisha 1 Harbhanga Har Khet Ko Pani RRR Water boies (Tank) 7/0.0078 20 60 50 60 50 60 280

M.I (Odisha ) RRR water bodies (WHS) 50/0.00056 20 50 40 60 40 54 244

Total 98 150 350 370 320 300 376 1716

MoWr/Li (Odisha) Lift Irrigation (River Lift ) 40 100 150 160 190 150 150 800 SC & DW Dept, Ground water Development 100 30 80 80 50 60 130 400 Odisha 1 Kantamal Har Khet Ko Pani RRR Water boies (Tank) 2/0.0022 10 30 30 40 25 35 160 M.I (Odisha ) RRR water bodies (WHS) 25/0.00028 10 20 25 20 24 33 122 Total 140 150 280 295 770 259 348 1482

Total Command Name of Total estimated Concerned Area/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise the Blocks/ Number/ cost (Rs in S.No Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation Sub- Capacity lakh ) Department Potential Districts (BCM) ( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Lined Channels 0.0283 500 600 650 700 600 600 3150

Boudh MoRD/ Water Unlined Channels 0.0283 100 2 2 3 2.5 2.57 12.07 Resources Har Khet ko Pani 1 (CADA) Micro Irrigation 0.005 40 11 15 15 15 20 76 Total 640 613 667 718 617.5 472.57 3238.07

Lined channels .0283 600 800 800 800 800 686.20 3000

Harbhanga Unlined Channels 0.0283 100 5 7 6 5 10.6 33.6 MoRD/ Water 1 Resources Har Khet ko Pani Micro Irrigation 0.005 75 30 40 40 40 40 190 (CADA) Total 775 835 847 846 845 736.8 4109.8

Lined channels 0.00283 600 800 800 800 800 916 4116

Kantamal MoRD/ Water Unlined Channels .0283 350 12 10 12 15 21 60 1 Resources Har Khet ko Pani Micro Irrigation 0.005 50 30 40 40 40 40 190 (CADA) Total 1000 42 850 852 855 977 4366 Subtotal Hark het ko Pani 2820 16911.9

Component No.3 Per Drop More Crop (Micro Irrigation) under PMKSY Total Name of Command Total estimated the Concerned Area/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise Number/ cost (Rs in S.No Blocks/ Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation Capacity lakh ) Sub- Department Potential (BCM) Districts ( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

DPAP Drip 160 20 80 85 80 80 107 432 MOA & FW- DAC & FW/ DPAP Sprinkler 350 100 15 15 12 20 26.6 68.6 Boudh Agril, Horticulture, Non- DPAP Drip 80 20 5 4 4 5 3.6 21.6 Odisha Non- DPAP Sprinkler 150 60 60 70 60 65 39 294

Total 740 200 160 174 156 170 176.2 816.2

Total Name of Command Total estimated the Concerned Area/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise Number/ cost (Rs in S.No Blocks/ Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation Capacity lakh ) Sub- Department Potential (BCM) Districts ( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

DPAP Drip 150 40 8 8 7 9 8.5 40.5 MOA & FW- DAC & FW/ DPAP Sprinkler 320 60 10 12 15 12 13.7 62.7 Harbhanga Agril, Horticulture, Non- DPAP Drip 50 20 3 3 4 2 1.5 13.5 Odisha Non- DPAP Sprinkler 150 30 60 70 60 65 39 294

Total 670 150 81 93 86 88 62.7 410.7

MOA & FW- DPAP Drip 190 50 10 11 12 10 8.3 51.3 DAC & FW/ DPAP Sprinkler 330 60 12 13 15 10 14.6 64.6 Kantamal Agriculture, Horticulture, Non- DPAP Drip 70 20 5 4 3 4 3 19 Odisha Non- DPAP Sprinkler 200 50 100 80 80 70 62 392

Total 790 180 127 108 110 94 87.9 526.9

Agril/Horticulture Farm Ponds 500 50 100 105 95 130 95 525 Per drop more crop (Supplementary Boudh SC & DW Dept., water Check Dams/ Diversion 305/0.0023 150 500 600 400 480 339 2319 Odisha management Weir activities )

Total 500 200 600 705 495 610 434 2844

Name of Command Total Total the Concerned Area/ estimated Number/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise S.No Blocks/ Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation cost (Rs in Capacity Sub- Department Potential lakh ) (BCM) Districts ( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Agril/Horticulture Per drop more crop (Supplementary Check Dams/ Diversion Harbhanga SC & DW Dept., water 128/0.0009 132 200 200 300 300 240 1240 Weir Odisha management activities) Total 128/0.0009 100 200 200 300 300 240 1240

Agril/Horticulture Per drop more crop (Supplementary Check Dams/ Diversion Kantamal SC & DW Dept., water 125/0.0001 100 240 200 300 300 398 1238 Weir Odisha management activities)

Total 125/0.0001 100 240 200 300 300 398 1238

Subtota l Per drop more crop 930 7075.8

Component No-4 PMKSY Watershed

Total estimated Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise Name of the Concerned Total Number/ Command Area/ cost (Rs S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Capacity Irrigation Potential ( in lakh ) Districts Department (BCM) Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Boudh DoLR- PMKSY Newly created WHS MoRD / Watershed Farm Ponds 789/0.00102 180 200 200 300 300 200 1200

Department of Check Dams 160/0.0005 30 200 100 200 300 300 1100 Soil (Diversion Weirs) Conservation & Watershed Nallah Bunds 150/0.00015 10 25 50 50 40 60 225 Development, Odisha Percolation Tanks 1075/0.0007 180 200 100 200 300 300 1100

Other ground Water Recharge 135/0.001566 370 200 300 400 300 120 1320 Structure Water Harvesting 98/0.0009 180 100 125 100 90 173 588 Structure

Fishery ponds/ 120/0.000263 50 100 100 100 50 10 360 cattle pond Total - 1000 1025 975 1350 1380 1163 5893

Renovated WHS Farm Ponds 100/0.000121 31 15 20 15 10 11 71

Nallah Bunds 52/0.00005 26 5 6 5 8 7 31

Percolation 53/0.00003 60 5 6 5 8 8 32 Tanks Fishery ponds / 129/0.00035 80 50 50 60 40 50 258 cattle ponds Water Harvesting 210/0.002958 243 190 200 150 140 160 840 Structure Total - 430 1232 Newly created WHS

Farm Ponds 998/0.00130 100 200 200 300 400 140 1240

DoLR- Renovated WHS / MoRD Farm Ponds 92/0.00011 28 15 10 15 20 7 67 Harbhanga Department of Soil PMKSY Conservation Watershed & Watershed Water Harvesting 135/0.001901 272 100 105 100 50 50 405 Development, Structure Odisha

Total - 300 1712

Newly created WHS

Farm Ponds 998/0.00129 200 200 200 300 300 234 1234

DoLR- MoRD / Renovated WHS Kantamal Department of Soil PMKSY Farm Ponds 72/0.00001 20 10 10 10 10 15 55 Conservation Watershed & Watershed Development, Water Harvesting 142/0.0021 200 100 100 90 70 70 430 Odisha Structure

Total - 220 1719 PMKSY Subtotal 2250 10556 Watershed Grand PMKSY 12400 38890.7 total(PMKSY)

State Plan & Other Schemes

Convergence with MGNREGA Name of Command Total Total the Concerned Area/ estimated Number/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise S.No Blocks/ Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation cost (Rs Capacity Sub- Department Potential in lakh ) (BCM) Districts ( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Newly Created Water Conservation (Contour Bund, Contour Trench & Stagard Trench) Water Harvesting Structure 45/0.000068 50 16.20 16.20 16.20 16.20 16.20 81 Creation of Irrigation canals and

Drains Providing infrastructure for

Convergence irrigation Boudh with Land Development

MGNREGA (Field Bunding) Total - 50 81 Renovation Renovation of water bodies 50/0.00035 56 30 30 30 30 30 150 including desilting Renovation & Maintenance of

Irrigation Canals & Drains Sub Total - 106 231

Convergence with MGNREGA Command Total Total Name of the Concerned Area/ estimated Number/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation cost (Rs in Capacity Districts Department Potential ( lakh ) (BCM) Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Newly Created Water Conservation 200 ha. (Contour Bund, Contour Trench 14 15 14 15 12 70 (240000 rmt) & Stagard Trench) Water Harvesting Structure 50/ 0.000025 21 2 2 2 2 2.3 10.43 Creation of Irrigation canals

and Drains Providing infrastructure for

irrigation Convergence Land Development 500 ha. 60 70 50 60 60 300 Harbhanga with (Field Bunding) MGNREGA Total - 21

Renovation

Renovation of water bodies 25/ 0.00025 25 25 30 10 25 10 100 including desilting Renovation & Maintenance of

Irrigation Canals & Drains Total - 25 480.43

Command Total Total Name of the Concerned Area/ estimated Number/ Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation cost (Rs in Capacity Districts Department Potential ( lakh ) (BCM) Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Newly Created Water Conservation 100ha.(40000 (Contour Bund, Contour 5 5 6 7 12 35 rmt) Trench & Stagard Trench) Water Harvesting Structure 50/0.0000069 17 2 2 4 3 5 16 Creation of Irrigation canals

and Drains Providing infrastructure for

Convergence irrigation Land Development Kantamala with 50 6 5 5 5 9 30 (Field Bunding) MGNREGA

Total - 17

Renovation Renovation of water bodies 30/0.000078 28 30 25 30 24 8 117 including desilting Total - 28 198 Convergence Subtotal with 197 6784 MGNREGA

Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District under STATE IRRIGATION PLAN

S No Name of Concerned Component Activity Total Command Estimated cost(Rs in Lakh year wise) Total the Ministry/ Number/ Area/ Estimated Blocks/Sub Department Capacity Irrigation 2016-17 2017-18 2018- 2019- 2020- Cost Districts (BCM) Potential 19 2020 2021 (Rs in (Ha) Lakh)

Mega lift 5 1 Boudh 1500 270 737 800 900 2707 Project HIlung-Tel HIlung- river 2 Harbhanga 6000 1323 2707 3200 3600 10830 Tel river Dhalapur- Dhalapur- Mahanadi MoWR/ Mahanadi Ramgarh- SIP Odisha Ramgarh- Mahanadi Mahanadi Sampoch- 3 Kantamal Sampoch- Mahanadi 7000 2082 5556 5000 - 12638 Mahanadi Tirod- Tirod- Mahanadi Mahanadi

Total 14500 3675 9000 9000 4500 26175

PLAN-A: Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boud District ( Odisha) Under NABARD

Total Command estimated Total Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise Name of the Concerned Area/ cost (Rs in Number/ S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation lakh ) Capacity Districts Department Potential ( (BCM) Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

01 Boudh 5 100 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 100.00

02 Harabhanga M.O.W.R NABARD Odisha Lift Irrigation 5 100 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 100.00

03 Kantamal 5 100 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 100.00

Total 300 300.00

Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District under OTHER IRRIGATION SCHEMES

Command Estimated cost (Rs. In lakh Yr wise ) Total Total Name of the Concerned Area/ Estimated Sl. Number/ Blocks/Sub Ministry/ Component Activity Irrigation Cost No Capacity 2016- 2017- 2018- 2019- 2020- Districts Department Potential (Rs in (BCM) 17 18 19 2020 2021 (Ha) Lakh)

MIPs 300 (Balibeda-2 200 300 300 300 344 1544 1 Boudh 3 1000 DoWR ,M.I OIS Nalikumpa-2) 1080 2000 1000 3334 1000 8334

Odisha

2 Harbhanga Rajabasa 1 700 1000 1000 1000 1000 1402 5402

Total 1980 3300 2300 4634 2300 2746 15280

1 Boudh 5plips 4 3 6 5 5 15 34 Agriculture/lift 2 Harabhanga OIS Jalanidhi 5plips 4 3 6 5 5 15 34 irrigation 3 Kantamal 21plips 15 14 14 14 24 16 82 Total 31 23 20 26 24 34 46 150 Subtotal 2003 15430 Grand Total State plan & (State plan & other 17000 42583.4 other schems) schems) PMKSY Grand + total(PMKSY+ 29400 81474.1 Other Otherscheme) Scheme

ABSTRACT OF PLAN-B (20 YEARS LONGTERM BUDGET)

Command Total Area/ Name of the Name of the Estimated S No Component Irrigation Districts scheme Cost Potential (Rs in Lakh) (Ha)

LONG TERM LAXMIPATHAR DAM 1 BOUDH 3880 46120 SCHEMES (1/0.014

SALKI HE(1/1.25MW) 9000 106980

T0TAL 12880 153100

PLAN - B

Long term Schemes (20 years) 2021-22 to 2034-2035 Name of the Blocks/ Concerned Total Number/ Estimated Command Area/ Irrigation Period of Sub-Districts Ministry/ Component Activitiy Capacity cost ( in Rs. Potential ( Ha) Implementation (20 Yrs) Department (BCM) In lakh)

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Laxmipathar 46120 1/0.014 3880 20 Harabhanga MoWR/ Dam

Boudh & AIBP Harabhanga WR 106980 Salki HE 1/125MW 9000 20 (Odisha)

Total 12880 153100 Major& medium Irrigation Project (Long term 2021-22 to 2034-35)

Command area 12880 Ha, Budget provision 153100 Lakh, Duration-20years

Other Schemes

Budget Provision (20 Years) – 644000 Lakh

PLAN- B

Table. 5.2. Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District (Odisha) under PMKSY

Component No.1 AIBP Total Name of the Concerned Command Period of Number/ Estimated cost S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation Capacity ( in Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20 Yrs) (BCM) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Barage of Sattighat in Boudh 1/ 0.124 1000 20 400000.00 Boudh District** Construction of Barage Boudh 1/ 0.62 5000 20 150000.00 upstream of Boudh Town Boudh/ MoWR/ Canal Lining of SIP 32 11965 20 9830.00 Harabhanga Boudh/ Canal Lining of Bagh 77 8834 20 4850.00 Kantamal AIBP WR (Odisha) Construction of Barage Kantamal across Khadag River in 1/2.26 15929 20 8000.00 Kantamala Block Megalift Project at Kantamal 1 7500 20 8000.00 Kanatamala Block Boudh Diversion Weir 1/ 0.00456 314 20 210.00 M.I (Odisha) Harabhanga Diversion Weir 1/ 0.0061 425 20 435.00

Component No.2 Har Khet Ko Pani Total Name of the Concerned Command Period of S. Number/ Estimated cost Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation No Capacity ( in Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20Yrs) (BCM) Lift Irrigation (River Lift) 150 3600 20 3000.00 MoWR/ Ground Water 350 700 20 1400.00 L.I (Odisha) Development Boudh SC & DW RRR of Waterbodies 210/ 0.0023 425 20 840.00 Dept., Odisha (WHS) RRR of 5/ 0.0056 300 20 200.00 Waterbodies(Tank) M.I (Odisha) Renovation of Harabhanga 4/ 0.0155 392 20 480.00 Waterbodies Lift Irrigation (River Lift) 150 3600 20 3000.00 L.I (Odisha) Har Ground Water 200 400 20 800.00 Khet Ko Development Harabhanga RRR of M.I (Odisha) 7/ 0.0078 420 20 280.00 Pani Waterbodies(Tank) SC & DW RRR of Waterbodies 160/ 0.0018 400 20 780.00 Dept., Odisha (WHS) Lift Irrigation (River Lift) 175 4200 20 3500.00 L.I (Odisha) Ground Water 500 1000 20 2000.00 Development RRR of Waterbodies Kantamal M.I (Odisha) 6/ 0.0067 360 20 240.00 (Tank) SC & DW RRR of Waterbodies 160/ 0.0018 385 20 780.00 Dept., Odisha (WHS)

Total Name of the Concerned Command Period of Number/ Estimated cost S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation Capacity ( in Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20 Yrs) (BCM) Construction of Field Channels

Lined Field Channels 0.0283 7135 20 2996.70

Boudh Unlined Channels 0.0283 503 20 12.07

Micro- Irrigation 0.005 347 20 329.65

Lined Field Channels 0.0283 10937 20 4593.54 Har Harabhanga MoRD/ Unlined Channels 0.0283 1400 20 33.60 Water Khet Ko Resources Pani Micro- Irrigation 0.005 78 20 744.80 (CADA) Lined Field Channels 0.0283 13552 20 5691.84

Unlined Channels 0.0283 2500 20 60.00 Kantamal Micro- Irrigation 0.005 1784 20 631.75

Total - 38236 15093.95

SubTotal - 54418 32393.95

100

Component No.3 Per Drop More Crop (Micro Irrigation)

Command Total Name of the Concerned Area/ Period of Estimated Number/ S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Irrigation Implementation cost ( in Rs. Capacity Districts Department Potential (20 Yrs) In lakh) (BCM) ( Ha) MOA & FW- DPAP Drip 500 ha. 500 20 135.125 Boudh, DPAP Sprinkler 1000 ha. 1001 20 196.00 Harabhanga & DAC & FW/ Kantamal Horticulture, Non- DPAP Drip 200 ha. 200 20 54.05 Odisha Non- DPAP Sprinkler 500 ha. 500 20 980.00 DPAP Drip - - - - DPAP Sprinkler - - - - Boudh Non- DPAP Drip 200 200 20 200.00 Non- DPAP Sprinkler 400 400 20 80.00 Per drop more DPAP Drip - - - - Agriculture, crop (micro DPAP Sprinkler - - - - Harabhanga Odisha irrigation) Non- DPAP Drip 200 200 20 200.00 Non- DPAP Sprinkler 400 400 20 80.00 DPAP Drip - - - - DPAP Sprinkler - - - - Kantamal Non- DPAP Drip 200 200 20 200.00 Non- DPAP Sprinkler 400 400 20 80.00

Total - 4001 2205.18

101

MGNREGA Boudh Horticulture Farm Ponds 500 nos. 500 20 525.00

Boudh 305/ 0.0023 1297 20 2319.00 SC & DW Dept., Check Dams/ Harabhanga 125/ 0.0009 532 20 1240.00 Odisha Per drop more crop Diversion Weir Kantamal (Supplementary water 125/ 0.0001 531 20 1238.00 management activities) Secondary Storage

structures On Farm Development (distribution pipe / raised bed and furrow system etc.) Total - 2860 5322.00

Sub Total - 6861 7527.18

102

Component No.4 PMKSY Watershed

Name of the Concerned Command Period of S. Total Number/ Cap acity Estimated cost Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation No (BCM) ( in Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20 Yrs) Newly created WHS Farm Ponds 789/ 0.00102 333 20 1200.00 Check Dams (Diversion 160/ 0.0005 240 20 1100.00 Weirs) Nallah Bunds 150/ 0.00015 50 20 225.00 Percolation Tanks 1075/ 0.0007 268 20 1100.00 Other ground Water 135/ 0.001566 678 20 1320.00 Recharge Structure DoLR-MoRD / Water Harvesting Structure 98/ 0.0009 395 20 588.00

Fishery ponds/ cattle pond 120/ 0.000263 67.5 20 360.00 PMKSY Boudh Department of Total - 2031 5893.00 Soil Conservation Watershed Renovated WHS & Watershed Development, Farm Ponds 100/ 0.000121 31 20 71.00 Odisha Check Dams Nallah Bunds 52/ 0.00005 26 20 31.00 Percolation Tanks 53/ 0.00003 29 20 32.50 Other Ground Water

Recharge Structure Fishery ponds / cattle ponds 129/ 0.00035 51 20 258.00 Water Harvesting Structure 210/ 0.002958 722 20 840.00 Total - 859 1232.50

103

Name of the Concerned Command Period of Total Number/ Capacity Estimated cost S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation (BCM) ( in Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20Yrs) Newly created WHS Farm Ponds 998/ 0.00130 421 20 1240.00 Check Dams (Diversion 90/ 0.0003 120 20 520.00 Weirs) Nallah Bunds 180/ 0.0005 80 20 270.00 Percolation Tanks 400/ 0.0003 93 20 800.00 Other ground Water 120/ 0.001392 602 20 1200.00 Recharge Structure DoLR-MoRD/ Fishery ponds/ cattle pond 180/ 0.000394 101 20 540.00

Total - 1417 4570.00 Department of PMKSY Renovated WHS Harabhanga Soil Conservation & Watershed Watershed Farm Ponds 92/ 0.00011 28 20 67.00 Development, Check Dams Odisha Nallah Bunds

Percolation Tanks Other Ground Water

Recharge Structure Fishery ponds / cattle ponds 180/ 0.0004 100 20 540.00 Water Harvesting Structure 135/ 0.001901 464 20 405.00

Total - 592 1012.00

104

Name of the Concerned Command Period of Total Number/ Capacity Estimated cost S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation (BCM) ( in Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20 Yrs) Newly created WHS Farm Ponds 998/ 0.00129 421 20 1234.00 Check Dams (Diversion 90/ 0.0003 120 20 520.00 Weirs) Nallah Bunds 182/ 0.0005 94 20 272.00 Percolation Tanks 400/ 0.0003 94 20 800.00 Other ground Water DoLR-MoRD/ 120/ 0.001392 602 20 1200.00 Recharge Structure

Fishery ponds/ cattle pond 190/ 0.0005 110 20 550.00 PMKSY Total - 1441 4576.00 Kantamal Department of Soil Conservation Watershed Renovated WHS & Watershed Farm Ponds 72/ 0.00001 20 20 55.00 Development, Check Dams Odisha Nallah Bunds Percolation Tanks 49/ 0.000025 27 20 31.00 Other Ground Water

Recharge Structure Fishery ponds / cattle ponds 182/ 0.0004 105 20 544.00 Water Harvesting Structure 142/ 0.0021 475 20 430.00 Total - 627 1060.00 Sub Total - 6967 18343.50

105

Convergence with MGNREGA Name of the Concerned Command Period of Total Number/ Capacity Estimated cost S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation (BCM) ( Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20 Yrs) Newly Created Water Conservation 625 ha. (Contour Bund, Contour 20 212.00 (250000 rmt) Trench & Stagard Trench) Water Harvesting Structure 225/ 0.00034 250 20 405.00 Creation of Irrigation canals

and Drains Providing infrastructure for

irrigation Land Development 1550 ha. 20 925.00 (Field Bunding) Convergence Total - 250 1542.00 Boudh with MGNREGA Renovation Renovation of water bodies 155/ 0.0011 170.00 20 465.00 including desilting

Renovation & Maintenance

of Irrigation Canals & Drains

465.00 Total - 170.00

106

Name of the Concerned Command Period of Total Number/ Capacity Estimated cost S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation (BCM) ( Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20 Yrs) Newly Created Water Conservation 600 ha. (Contour Bund, Contour 20 210.00 (240000 rmt) Trench & Stagard Trench) Water Harvesting Structure 230/ 0.000025 98 20 48.00 Creation of Irrigation canals

and Drains Providing infrastructure for

Convergence irrigation Land Development Harabhanga with 1500 ha. 20 900.00 (Field Bunding) MGNREGA Total - 98 1158

Renovation Renovation of water bodies 100/ 0.00025 103 20 400.00 including desilting Renovation & Maintenance

of Irrigation Canals & Drains Sub Total 103.00 400.00

107

Total Name of the Concerned Command Period of Number/ Estimated cost ( S.No Blocks/ Sub- Ministry/ Component Activitiy Area/ Irrigation Implementation Capacity in Rs. In lakh) Districts Department Potential ( Ha) (20 Yrs) (BCM) Newly Created Water Conservation 600 ha. (Contour Bund, Contour 20 212.00 (240000 rmt) Trench & Stagard Trench) 252/ Water Harvesting 85 20 81.00 0.000035 Creation of Irrigation canals

and Drains Providing infrastructure for Convergence with Kantamal irrigation MGNREGA Land Development 250 20 150.00 (Field Bunding) Total - 85 443 Renovation Renovation of water bodies 115/ 0.0003 108 20 450.00 including desilting Renovation & Maintenance of

Irrigation Canals & Drains Total - 108.00 450.00 Sub Total (Convergence with MGNREGA) 814.00 4458.00 GRAND TOTAL(20 years Budget) 120027.5 644047

108

Annexure-I Water requirement of crops (mm) for its estimation under PMKSY

Sl. No. Crop Water requirement (mm) 1 Rice 1100 2 Wheat 350 3 Barley 350 4 Oats 400 5 Sugarcane 2000 6 Maize 500 7 Sorghum 450 8 Pearlmillet 450 9 Ragi 400 10 Blackgram 400 11 Greengram/Horsegram/Cowpea 350 12 Pea 350 13 Bengalgram 350 14 Redgram 450 15 Lentil 450 16 Beans 450 17 Soybean 450 18 Groundnut 400 19 Rapeseed / Mustard 350 20 Sunflower 350 21 Saffflower 300 22 Sesamum 400 23 Castor 350 24 Linseed 400 25 Jute 500 26 Cotton 550 27 Tobacco 600 28 Mirchi 600 29 Potato 550 30 Tomato 600 31 Onion 550 32 Cabbage 450 33 Other vegetables 550

109

Common values of water requirement for different livestock

Total water SL. Name of livestock Water requirement demand No. (litres) / livestock (litres/day) 1. Cattle / Cow / Buffalo (365 days) 30 10950

2. Sheep (270 days) 3.0 810

3. Hen (Broiler) (42 days) 0.2 8.4

4. Hen (layer) (365 days) 0.2 73

5. Pig (365 days) 4.5 1643

6. Goat (270 days) 3.0 810

110

Annexure-II List of projects

Major Medium projects Name of the Name of the Blocks CCA(Th. Ha) Remarks district project benefited Boudh Laxmi pathar Harabhanga 3.88 Long term dam Boudh Salki H.E Boudh & 9.0/125MW Long term Harabhanga

Mega lift project

District Name of the Name of the Block wise District wise CCA in Block scheme river CCA Ha Ha Hilung Tel Boudh 7500 Boudh 1500 Dhalpur Mahanadi Boudh Harbhanga 6000 Ramgarh Mahanadi Boudh Harbhanga Sampoch Mahanadi Boudh Harbhanga Tirod Mahanadi Boudh Harbhanga

New MIPs to be taken up

Name of the Block Name of the project Ayacut in Ha Boudh Bailbeda 200 Boudh Nalikumpa 1988 Boudh Bailbeda 200 Boudh Nalikumpa 1988 Harbhanga Rajabasa 700

CADA , Boudh Name of the command Name of the block Total CCA(Ha) Salki Harabhanga 8426 Salki Boudh 11465

111

Tables for collating information on DIP (for the ERM Programme of where CAD work has been taken up & now non-functional) Area in Ha. Total Name Name of OFD OFD Name of Total Developed Programme for Year of Year of Sl.No of the the dilapidated already Remarks the Block CCA Area (OFD Strengthening/Restoration inclusion Completion District Command / damaged Restored Completed) Harbhanga 8426.00 7395.0 5800.00 1200.00 4600.00 1 Boudh Salki 2019-20 2021-22 Boudh 11465.00 10435.0 6800.00 1600.00 5200.00 Total 19891.00 17830.00 12600.00 2800.00 9800.00

Tables for collating information on DIP (for the new irrigation Project) Area in Ha. Name of the Name of the Name of the Total Area OFD work to be Year of Year of Sl.No Remarks District Command Block (CCA) taken up Inclusion completion 1 Bagha Kantamal 11000.0 11000.00 2019-20 2021-22 Total 11000.0 11000.0 2 Boudh 3470.00 3470.00 Boudh 3 Minor Harabhanga 7836.00 7836.00 2020-21 2022-23 4 Irrrigation Kantamal 4261.00 4261.00 Total 15567.00 15567.00 Grand Total 26567.00 26567.00

112

Phone Numbers of DLIC Member s

SL. MOBILE NAME DESIGNATION E Mail id NO. NO. 1 Sri Madhusudan Mishra Collector, Boudh 9937896188 [email protected]

2 Sri Sridhar Das Deputy Director, 9437082128 [email protected] Agril.-cum-PD, ATMA 3 Sri Raghab Mallick Project Director, 9437194835 [email protected] Watersheds, Boudh 4 Sri S. Maharana ASST. Director of Horticulture, 9437594824 [email protected] Boudh 5 Sri Bimal Mal Representative 9438345779 [email protected] PD, DRDA, BOUDH 6 Dr. Debabrata Panigrahi Senior Scientist 9437272009 [email protected] RRTTS, G. Udayagiri 7 Dr. D. K Debata Senior Scientist 9437441349 [email protected] RRTTS, G. Udayagiri 8 Sri A. K. Sahu Executive Engineer, 9437217927 [email protected] OLIC, Boudh 9 Sri G. P. Prusty Executive Engineer, 9438019095 [email protected] MIP, Boudh 10 Sri A. K Sethy Executive Engineer, 9437681177 [email protected] Irrigation Div., Boudh 11 Sri AK.Sethy. ADR, RRTTS, 9439407996 [email protected] G. Udayagiri, OUAT 12 Dr A.Parida Professor & Head, 9937450648 [email protected] Dept. of Statistics, OUAT

113

For more information please contact:

Collector & District Magistrate At/Po/Dist: Boudh Phone: 06841-222203 Fax: 06841-222204 Email: [email protected]

Deputy Director Agriculture At/Po/Dist: Boudh Phone: 9437082128

Project Director, Watersheds At/Po/Dist: Boudh Phone: 9437585561 [email protected]

114