The Bundesrat and the Federal System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Bundesrat and the Federal System Infographics Contents The five permanent constitutional bodies of the Federation 4 The Bundesrat is one of the five permanent constitutional bodies The State and Federalism Twofold separation of powers in the federal system 7 of the Federal Republic of Germany. In Germany’s federal system, The Bundesrat Federal constitutional body 5 the Bundesrat represents the 16 federal states as constituent Federalism – Unity in diversity 6 Seats in the Bundesrat reflecting federal state elections 17 states within the overall state, the Federation. Advantages of the federal system vis-à-vis the unitary state 9 The Mediation Committee – Finding compromises 30 and the Federal System Disadvantages of the federal system? 11 A bright future for federalism 11 Steps in the legislative procedure pursuant to the Basic Law 41 While the Bundesrat functions as a link between the Federation Clear responsibilities and interdependencies 12 Bundesrat consent when Länder interests are affected 47 and the federal states, it is simultaneously a counterweight to Consent or veto for international agreements 51 the Bundestag and the Federal Government. Within the federal The Bundesrat of the Federal Organisation and working methods system, separation of powers entails oversight of how power Continuity and stability in the democratic federal system 63 Republic of Germany The Bundesrat’s seat – The plenary session 16 Link between the Federal Government and the federal states 67 is used. That exemplifies stability in federal democracy. Distribution of votes 18 Bundesrat – A statistical overview 70 The Members 19 This brochure offers a sound, factual overview of the Bundesrat’s The federal legislative procedure 72 President and Presidium 20 organisational structure and complex remit, complete with Voting 22 explanatory infographics. The Plenary Session 24 Published by: The Committees 26 The Chamber of European Affairs – A small-scale Bundesrat 27 Bundesrat The Mediation Committee 28 Press and Communication Division Working methods in the Bundesrat 31 11055 Berlin Tel.: +49 30 189100-0 The Bundesrat’s responsibilities E-mail: [email protected] The Bundesrat – A federal body 38 www.bundesrat.de Actively shaping policy 38 Bundesrat coordination: Press and Communications Division 1. Position on government draft legislation 39 English translation: Helen Ferguson 2. Referral to the Mediation Committee 39 3. Decisions on consent bills 40 Concept & Design: EYES-OPEN – Agency for communication 4. Involvement in objection bills 43 Sabine Dittrich, Martin Jagodzinski 5. Bundesrat legislative proposals 44 Photo credits: Bundesrat (p. 49, 69), Dirk Michael Deckbar (title page, p. 8, 6. Statutory instruments 44 13, 14/15, 25, 33, 34/35, 36/37, 45, 53, 54/55, 57, 64), photothek.net/ 7. Consent to general administrative regulations 46 Florian Gärtner (back cover, p. 2/3, 23, 60), picture alliance/ 8. Participation in European policy issues 46 Christoph Soeder (p. 29), picture alliance/Kay Nietfeld (p. 43) 9. Participation in foreign affairs 50 Bundestag eagle: Created by Prof. Ludwig Gies, 10. Right to be informed by the Federal Government 50 2008 version: buero uebele, Stuttgart 11. Other tasks – Appointment of officials 52 Print: PIEREG Druckcenter Berlin GmbH The Bundesrat’s role Berlin 2020 – 15th edition Democratic order – Separation of powers 56 Further information on the Bundesrat’s work Decision-making as a federal constitutional body 56 is available free of charge from: Decision-making as a political constitutional body 59 Counterweight exercising oversight of the Federation 61 Bundesrat, Press and Communications Division, 11055 Berlin Counterweight and corrective for Bundestag decisions 62 or on the website: https://www.bundesrat.de/EN/homepage/homepage-node.html Linking the Federation and the federal states 66 You can follow the Bundesrat: Continuing a positive tradition – Forerunners of the Bundesrat 66 Twitter App @bundesrat bundesrat.de/infoapp Instagram Newsletter Bundesrat @bundesrat www.bundesratkompakt.de 11055 Berlin www.bundesrat.de YouTube @BundesratDeutschland The Coats of Arms of Distribution of Votes in the Bundesrat the 16 Federal States 69 votes in total Second reading in Mediation procedure Further deliberations Bundesrat objection Bill adopted/rejected Counter-signature Enactment and promulgation Population in millions (M) the Bundesrat Baden- Würemberg Bavaria Area: 35,748 km² Area: 70,542 km² Baden-Württemberg 11.1 M Consent bills Bill Bavaria 13.1 M Consent Berlin 3.7 M Berlin Brandenburg Area: 891 km² Area: 29,655 km² Request to convene Brandenburg 2.5 M Consent withheld Agreement Unamended Enactment Bremen 0.7 M Bremen Hamburg Area: 755 km² Area: 419 km² Hamburg 1.8 M Kiel Request to Mediation Hamburg Amendment convene Committee Schwerin Hesse 6.3 M Bremen Berlin Mecklenburg- Hannover Objection is not Federal Government Hesse Western Pomerania Potsdam Bill not adopted Magdeburg overturned Federal President Area: 21,116 km² Area: 23,295 km² Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania 1.6 M Approval Unamended Düsseldorf Enactment Dresden Objection is Erfurt Objection Lower Saxony 8.0 M overturned Wiesbaden North Rhine- Mainz Lower Saxony Westphalia Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie North Rhine-Westphalia 17.9 M © Area: 47,710 km² Area: 34,112 km² Saarbrücken Approval Stuttgart Munich Kartengrundlage: Rhineland-Palatinate 4.1 M Bill Saarland 1.0 M Objection bills Rhineland-Palatinate Saarland Area: 19,858 km² Area: 2,571 km² Saxony 4.1 M 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 All bills approved by the If the Bundestag and Bundesrat If the Mediation Committee A Bundesrat objection can be A law can be adopted if the The bill is counter-signed by The bill is subsequently transmitted Bundestag are transmitted to are not in agreement concerning a proposes that changes be made overturned by the Bundestag Bundesrat consents to it, the Federal Chancellor and the to the Federal President for the Bundesrat (second reading). draft bill, the matter may be referred to the bill, Bundestag confirmation with an absolute majority, i.e. the does not request referral to relevant minister. enactment. It is promulgated in Saxony-Anhalt 2.2 M The Bundesrat’s scope for parti- to the Mediation Committee. is needed to adopt this proposal. majority of Bundestag members. the Mediation Committee the Bundesgesetzblatt and can Saxony Saxony-Anhalt cipation depends on whether Its role is to find a compromise. The Bundesrat must also delibe- If a two-thirds majority supports (approval), does not raise an subsequently enter into force on the the bill is a consent bill or an The Mediation Committee com- rate once again on this proposed the objection in the Bundesrat, objection when a mediation date stipulated by the legislator. Area: 18,450 km² Area: 20,454 km² Schleswig-Holstein 2.9 M States with more than objection bill. The Basic Law prises 16 Bundesrat members amendment. If the Mediation a two-thirds majority is also procedure has been concluded 2 million inhabitants explicitly lists the categories and 16 Bundestag members. The Committee does not propose any required in the Bundestag to or if the Bundestag overrules have four votes of bills that require Bundesrat Bundesrat can request that it be changes to the bill, it is only trans- overrule this objection. the objection. A law cannot be consent. Bills that do not fall convened and, if the Bundesrat mitted to the Bundesrat for further adopted if consent is withheld Thuringia 2.1 M States with more than into one of the categories withholds its consent to a consent deliberations. The Bundesrat (possibly after one or several 6 million inhabitants enumerated there or do not bill, the Bundestag and Federal may then decide whether it mediation procedures) or if the have five votes Schleswig-Holstein Thuringia address one of the subject Government may also refer the will approve the bill or raise Bundestag does not overturn Area: 15,804 km² Area: 16,202 km² States with more than areas cited are classed matter to the Mediation Committee. an objection, whether it will an objection. Each state has at Total population in 7 million inhabitants as objection bills. That means that several mediation consent or withhold its consent. least three votes Germany: 83.1 M have six votes procedures are possible. Population figure (status 30.06.2019) – Source @ Statistisches Bundesamt 2019 Population figure (status 30.06.2019) – Source @ Statistisches Bundesamt 2019 Map based on data from: Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie The Bundesrat and the Federal System The Bundesrat of the Federal Republic of Germany Author: Dr Konrad Reuter Published by: Bundesrat, Press and Communication Berlin 2020 – 15th edition The State and Federalism The Bundesrat’s meaning and significance arise advantages and disadvantages of federalism compared from Germany’s federal system. That is why this to more centralised systems. This analysis will reveal the brochure begins by describing the basic features crucial role of the twofold separation of powers for the of federalism. That entails addressing the functioning of a democratic state with a federal system. The five permanent Federal constitutional bodies of constitutional body the Federation The Bundesrat is one of the five permanent The best way to understand the significance constitutional bodies of the Federal Republic of this constitutional provision is to first of Germany, alongside the Federal President, consider its background: the way in which Federal President the Bundestag, the Federal Government the state is structured, with the Federation, and the Federal Constitutional Court. or central tier of government, and the Bundestag The Bundesrat acts as a representative of federal states – the particular form of the Länder (federal states) at national level federalism that exists in Germany. and participates in decisions on policy Federalism, the form of state organisation Federal Government adopted at this level i.e. by the Federation as adopted in Germany, creates state unity a whole. It thus acts as a counterweight to yet also sets boundaries to ensure that Bundesrat the Bundestag and the Federal Government, the notion of unity is not given excessive which are the political bodies that represent weight.
Recommended publications
  • Germany | Freedom House
    Germany | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/germany A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 12 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Germany’s head of state is a largely ceremonial president, chosen by the Federal Convention, a body formed jointly by the Bundestag (Federal Parliament) and state representatives. The president can serve up to two five-year terms. Former foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier of the SPD was elected president in early 2017. The federal chancellor—the head of government—is elected by the Bundestag and usually serves for the duration of a legislative session. The chancellor’s term can be cut short only if the Bundestag chooses a replacement in a so-called constructive vote of no confidence. Angela Merkel won a fourth term as chancellor following 2017 Bundestag elections, which were held in accordance with democratic standards. After 18 years as the head of the CDU, Merkel announced in October that she would step down as chairperson at year’s end, and that she would not seek another term as chancellor in the 2021 elections. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The German constitution provides for a lower house of parliament, the Bundestag, as well as an upper house, the Bundesrat (Federal Council), which represents the country’s 16 federal states. The Bundestag is elected at least every four years through a mixture of proportional representation and single-member districts, which can lead the number of seats to vary from the minimum of 598.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Wars: the Fascism Awakens Representation and Its Failure from the Weimar Republic to the Galactic Senate Chapman Rackaway University of West Georgia
    STAR WARS: THE FASCISM AWAKENS 7 Star Wars: The Fascism Awakens Representation and its Failure from the Weimar Republic to the Galactic Senate Chapman Rackaway University of West Georgia Whether in science fiction or the establishment of an earthly democracy, constitutional design matters especially in the realm of representation. Democracies, no matter how strong or fragile, can fail under the influence of a poorly constructed representation plan. Two strong examples of representational failure emerge from the post-WWI Weimar Republic and the Galactic Republic’s Senate from the Star Wars saga. Both legislatures featured a combination of overbroad representation without minimum thresholds for minor parties to be elected to the legislature and multiple non- citizen constituencies represented in the body. As a result both the Weimar Reichstag and the Galactic Senate fell prey to a power-hungry manipulating zealot who used the divisions within their legislature to accumulate power. As a result, both democracies failed and became tyrannical governments under despotic leaders who eventually would be removed but only after wars of massive casualties. Representation matters, and both the Weimer legislature and Galactic Senate show the problems in designing democratic governments to fairly represent diverse populations while simultaneously limiting the ability of fringe groups to emerge. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of representative democracies. A poor evil is for good men to do nothing.” constitutional design can even lead to tyranny. – Edmund Burke (1848) Among the flaws most potentially damaging to a republic is a faulty representational “So this is how liberty dies … with structure. Republics can actually build too thunderous applause.” - Padme Amidala (Star much representation into their structures, the Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith, 2005) result of which is tyranny as a byproduct of democratic failure.
    [Show full text]
  • CONCEPT of STATEHOOD in UNITED NATIONS PRACTICE * ROSALYN COHEN T
    1961] THE CONCEPT OF STATEHOOD IN UNITED NATIONS PRACTICE * ROSALYN COHEN t The topic of "statehood under international law" has long been a favorite with jurists. The problem of what constitutes a "state" has been extensively examined and discussed, but all too often in absolutist terms confined to drawing up lists of criteria which must be met before an entity may be deemed a "state." The very rigidity of this approach implies that the term "state" has a fixed meaning which provides an unambiguous yardstick for measuring without serious fear of error, the existence of international personality. The framework of examination being thus constricted, traditional inquiry has endeavored to meet some of its inadequacies by ancillary discussions on the possi- bility of a "dependent state" in international law, of the desirability of universality in certain organizations set up by the international com- munity, and of the rights of peoples to national self-determination. It would appear, however, that these questions, far from being ancillary, are integral to any discussion of "statehood." Even the language of the law-or perhaps especially the language of the law-contains ambiguities which are inherent in any language system, and the diffi- culties presented by this fact can only be resolved by an analysis which takes full cognizance of the contextual background. Thus, when ex- amining what is meant by the word "state," an appraisal of the com- munity interests which will be affected by the decision to interpret it in one way rather than in another is necessary. Discussions, for example, of whether a "dependent state" can exist under international law become meaningless unless there is first an examination of whether the community of nations would find it appropriate, in the light of its long range objectives, to afford the rights which follow from "state- hood" to entities fettered by restrictions which impair their independ- ence.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • Germany (1950-2018)
    Germany Self-rule INSTITUTIONAL DEPTH AND POLICY SCOPE Germany has two-tiered regional governance consisting of sixteen Länder and (Land)Kreise. Several Länder have a third tier between these two, Regierungsbezirke (administrative districts). Two Länder have a fourth tier of regional governance, Landschaftsverbände in North-Rhine Westphalia and Bezirksverband Pfalz in Rhineland-Palatinate.1 The 1949 Basic Law of the German Federal Republic granted eleven Länder extensive competences, which include legislative powers for culture, education, universities, broadcasting/television, local government, and the police (C 1949, Art. 74; Council of Europe: Germany 1999; Hrbek 2002; Swenden 2006; Watts 1999a, 2008). Länder also exercise residual competences (C 1949, Art. 70). In addition, the Basic Law states that Länder are responsible for the implementation of most federal laws (C 1949, Arts. 83–85). The federal government may legislate to preserve legal and economic unity with respect to justice, social welfare, civil law, criminal law, labor law, and economic law (C 1949, Art 72.2), and it has authority to establish the legislative framework in higher education, the press, environmental protection, and spatial planning (C 1949, Art. 72.3; Reutter 2006). The federal government exercises sole legislative authority over foreign policy, defense, currency, and public services (C 1949, Art. 73; Council of Europe: Germany 1999; Hrbek 2002; Swenden 2006; Watts 1999a, 2008). It also has exclusive authority over immigration and citizenship (C 1949, Arts. 73.2 and 73.3), though Länder administer inter-Land immigration and have concurrent competence on residence (Bendel and Sturm 2010: 186-187; C 1949, Arts. 74.4 and 74.6).2 However, this is not enough to qualify for the maximum score on policy scope.β The constitutional division of authority was extended to the five new Länder after unification in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Presidential and National Assembly Elections
    Namibia Presidential and National Assembly Elections 27 November 2019 MAP OF NAMIBIA ii CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... IX CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 INVITATION .................................................................................. 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE ....................................................................... 1 ACTIVITIES .................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2 – POLITICAL BACKGROUND............................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 3 BRIEF POLITICAL HISTORY ................................................................... 3 POLITICAL CONTEXT OF THE 2019 ELECTIONS ................................................ 4 POLITICAL PARTIES AND PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES CONTESTING THE 2019 ELECTIONS ....... 5 CHAPTER 3 – THE ELECTORAL FRAMEWORK AND ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ............................................... 6 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ELECTIONS ..................................................... 6 THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Women in Politics: Reflections from Malaysia
    International IDEA, 2002, Women in Parliament, Stockholm (http://www.idea.int). This is an English translation of Wan Azizah, “Perempuan dalam Politik: Refleksi dari Malaysia,” in International IDEA, 2002, Perempuan di Parlemen: Bukan Sekedar Jumlah, Stockholm: International IDEA, pp. 191-202. (This translation may vary slightly from the original text. If there are discrepancies in the meaning, the original Bahasa-Indonesia version is the definitive text). Case Study Women in Politics: Reflections from Malaysia Wan Azizah Women constitute half of humanity, and it follows that any decision-making, whether at the personal, family, societal or public levels, should be mindful of and involve the participation of women in the making of those decisions. Women’s political, social and economic rights are an integral and inseparable part of their human rights. Democracy is an inclusive process, and therefore in a functioning democracy, the points of view of different interest groups must be taken into account in formulating any decision. The interest and opinions of men, women and minorities must be part of that decision-making process. Yet far from being included in the decision-making process, women find themselves under-represented in political institutions. Numerous challenges confront women entering politics. Among them are lack of party support, family support and the "masculine model" of political life. Many feel that Malaysian society is still male dominated, and men are threatened by the idea of women holding senior posts. In the political sphere this is compounded by the high premium placed on political power. This makes some men even less willing to share power with women.
    [Show full text]
  • Commander's Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol
    Headquarters Army in Europe United States Army, Europe, and Seventh Army Pamphlet 360-6* United States Army Installation Management Agency Europe Region Office Heidelberg, Germany 20 September 2005 Public Affairs Commanders Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol *This pamphlet supersedes USAREUR Pamphlet 360-6, 8 March 2000. For the CG, USAREUR/7A: E. PEARSON Colonel, GS Deputy Chief of Staff Official: GARY C. MILLER Regional Chief Information Officer - Europe Summary. This pamphlet should be used as a guide for commanders new to Germany. It provides basic information concerning German society and customs. Applicability. This pamphlet applies primarily to commanders serving their first tour in Germany. It also applies to public affairs officers and protocol officers. Forms. AE and higher-level forms are available through the Army in Europe Publishing System (AEPUBS). Records Management. Records created as a result of processes prescribed by this publication must be identified, maintained, and disposed of according to AR 25-400-2. Record titles and descriptions are available on the Army Records Information Management System website at https://www.arims.army.mil. Suggested Improvements. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI, DSN 370-6447). Users may suggest improvements to this pamphlet by sending DA Form 2028 to the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI), Unit 29351, APO AE 09014-9351. Distribution. B (AEPUBS) (Germany only). 1 AE Pam 360-6 ● 20 Sep 05 CONTENTS Section I INTRODUCTION 1. Purpose 2. References 3. Explanation of Abbreviations 4. General Section II GETTING STARTED 5.
    [Show full text]
  • JANUS.NET Vol.8
    OBSERVARE Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa ISSN: 1647-7251 Vol. 8, Nº. 1 (May-October 2017) Articles Ricardo Real P. Sousa - Genealogy of behaviourist peace research - pp. 1-22 Gilberto Carvalho de Oliveira - Pacifist approaches to conflict resolution: an overview of the principled pacifism - pp. 23-43 Teresa Almeida Cravo - Peacebuilding: assumptions, practices and critiques - pp. 44-60 Patrícia Galvão Teles - The ICC at the centre ofan international criminal justice system: current challenges - pp. 61-73 Susana Abelho - Yanukovych's decision to postpone the signing of the agreement with the EU: a poliheuristic analysis - pp. 74-87 Miguel Santos Neves - Economic diplomacy, geo-economics and The external strategy of Portugal - pp. 88-118 Pedro Velez - Constitution and religiosity of/in the constitutional order of the National Socialist Empire - pp. 119-142 OBSERVARE Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa e-ISSN: 1647-7251 Vol. 8, Nº. 1 (May-October 2017), pp. 1-22 GENEALOGY OF BEHAVIOURIST PEACE RESEARCH Ricardo Real P. Sousa [email protected] Assistant Professor at Autonomous University of Lisbon (Portugal) and integrated researcher at OBSERVARE. He has a PhD from the International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) Erasmus University of Rotterdam (EUR) in the Netherlands. He was part of the Research School in Peace and Conflict (PRIO / NTNU / UiO) in Norway and associated with the Center of International Studies (CEI) Lisbon University Institute (IUL) in Portugal as a researcher on conflict. He has a Master of Science in Development Studies from the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) of the University of London, a post-graduation diploma of advanced studies in African Studies and a Bachelor (Hons) degree in Business Administration, both from the Lisbon University Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Jens Spahn
    Curriculum vitae Jens Spahn Parliamentary State Secretary at the German Federal Ministry of Finance Member of the German Bundestag Personal data: Name: Jens Spahn Date of birth: 16.05.1980 Place of birth: Ahaus, Germany Religion: Roman Catholic Contact details: Adress: Platz der Republik 1 11011 Berlin Email: [email protected] Telephone: +49 30 / 227 – 7 93 09 Fax: +49 30 / 227 – 7 68 14 Education and professional activities: Studies: Political science, (since 2003) graduating with a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in 2008 Education: Apprenticeship as bank clerk (1999 – 2001) Graduation: Obtained Abitur (higher-education (1999) entrance qualification) at Bischöfliche Canisiusschule, Ahaus Political activities 1995 - 2015 Member of the Junge Union Since 1997 Member of the CDU 1999-2006 Chairman of the Junge Union of the County Council Borken 1999-2009 Member of the City Council Ahaus Since 2002 Member of the German Bundestag Since 2005 Chairman of the CDU Council Union Borken 2005-2009 Chairman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Committee of Health 2009-2015 Member of the County Council Borken 2009-2015 Speaker for Health Politics of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the German Bundestag Since 2012 Member of the German CDU Executive Board Since 2014 Member of the CDU Executive Committee Since 2015 Parliamentary State Secretary at the German Federal Ministry of Finance Political memberships Member of the young group of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group Chairman of the parliamentary group Germany- Netherlands Member of the Economical- and Middle-class Union of the CDU Member of the parliamental group of middle-class Member of the Northrhine-Westfalian CDU Executive Board Guestmember of the Christian Social Union Member of Deutsche Parlamentarische Gesellschaft (Nonparty association for members of German Bundestag, Landtag and European Parliament) .
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly
    United Nation• AD HOC POLITICAL COI)IJTTEE 2f st GENERAL MEETING ASSEMBLY SIXTH SESSION Wednesday, 12 December 19Sl,at 10.30a.m. Official Record& Palais de Chaillot, Paris CONTENTS Page Appointment of an impartial international commission under United Nations supervision to carry out a simultaneous investigation in the Federal Republic of Germany, in Berlin, and in the Soviet Zone of Germany in order to determine whether existing conditions there make it possible to hold genuinely free elections throughout these areas (A/1 938, A/AC.53/L.ll, A/AC.53/L.l3, A/AC.53/L.l3/ Add.l, A/ AC.53 /L.l4) (continued)... • . 107 Chairman : Mr. Selirn SARPER (Turkey). Appointment of an impartial international commission of those contradictory statements, the proposed investi­ under United Nations supervision to carry out a gation commission would provide a reasonable means of simultaneous investigation in the Federal Republic ascertaining the facts and thus assist the four occupying of Germany, in Berlin, and in the Soviet Zone of Powers in solving the larger German problem. Germany in order to determine whether existing conditions there make it possible to hold genuinely 3. The Soviet Union protest that the General Assembly free elections throughout these areas (A/1938, was not competent to deal with the question had been AfAC.53fL.ll, AjAC.53jL.13, AjAC.53jL.13/Add.1, fully answered by the United Kingdom representative A/AC.53jL.14) (continued) (15th meeting). Its further charge that the joint draft resolution violated specific articles of international [Item 65]* treaties signed by the four occupying Powers regarding a future German settlement was clearly unfounded, as 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations with Other State Powers
    THE BULLETIN The Venice Commission was requested by the Constitutional Court of Romania, currently holding the presidency of the Conference of European Constitutional Courts (CECC), to produce a working document on the topic chosen by its Circle of Presidents at the preparatory meeting in Bucharest in October 2009 for the XV th Congress of the CECC. The topic was the following: “The relations of the Constitutional Court with other state authorities. Sub-topic 1: relations between the Constitutional Court and parliament. Sub-topic 2: conflicts of competence. Sub-topic 3: the execution of judgments.” The present working document is a contribution by the Venice Commission to the success of the Congress. Constitutional courts are the independent guarantors of the constitution and their main task is to protect the supremacy of the constitution over ordinary law. Over time, however, these courts have taken on further tasks, such as safeguarding the individual against the excess of the executive or providing a safeguard against judicial errors. Another very important role of these courts is to act as a neutral arbiter in cases of conflict between state bodies. Parties to such a conflict know that they can turn to the Constitutional Court for a decision that will help them in resolving their conflict based on the constitution. The possibility of turning to the court in itself sometimes incites them to settle their disputes before they even reach the court. In order to function correctly as an effective institution that stands above the parties in such a dispute, Constitutional Courts need to be independent and need to be seen as being independent.
    [Show full text]