Ancient Aztec Timeline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ancient Aztec Timeline Table of Contents Activities marked with an * can be used with one of the transparencies at the back of the book. Transparency Guide . .iv–vii Introduction . 1 Timeline of Ancient Mexico . 2 Ancient Aztec Timeline . 3 Activities *The First “Americans” . 4 *Map of the Aztec Empire . 5 * Mesoamerica . 6 * Olmecs: Mother Culture . 7 Chocolate Money . 8 * Aztec Origins . 9 * Aztec Writing . 10 * Fig-Bark Books . 11 Speaking Nahuatl . 12 Words of the Elders . 13 Counting the Days . 14 * City in the Lake . 15 * City in the Lake, II . 16 * Aztec Pyramids . 17 * Build a Pyramid . 18 * Aztec Art . 19 Aztec Medicine . 20 Aztec Conquests . 21 * Aztec Rulers . 22 *The Sun Stone . 23 * Chinampas: Floating Gardens . 24 Human Sacrifice . 25 Venn Diagram Free-For-All . 26 * Ancient Aztec Ball Game . 27 Montezuma Meets Cortes . 28 Daily Life . .29 * Aztec Math . .30 Who’s Who . .31 Aztecs Today/Review . .32 Then and Now . .33 Aztec Projects . .34 Learn More About Ancient Aztecs . .35 Answer Key . .36 Copyright © 2006 Milliken Publishing Co. MP4830 Timeline of ancient mexico Ancient Aztec timeline EARLY HUNTERS (18,000 B.C.–7,000 B.C) The timeline on the previous page places about AD 1200 Aztecs arrive in Central Mexico, Mesoamericans lead a nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle the Aztecs in the larger cultural and annoying everyone. historical context of Mesoamerica. The Archaeologists disagree about when early humans arrived in Central Mexico. One group believes the Aztecs appeared suddenly in the Valley Believed to be nomadic barbarians from the far northwest of Mexico, the Americas were populated between 20,000 and 30,000 years ago toward the end of the last Ice Age. of Mexico in the early 1200s Aztecs (called “the people whose face nobody knows”) arrive in the and from the early 1300s on were the With oceanic waters taken up by ice (rendering sea levels 200 feet lower than they are now), the first Central Valley. They are squatters, occupying land that does not belong to dominant culture for 200 years before immigrants are believed to have walked from Siberia to the western coast of Alaska over a wide swath them. For the next century or so, they wander the area, eating snakes and of land (now under water) connecting the two continents. Probably 10,000 or so years later, these the arrival of the Spanish. They were the last of the great pre-Conquest civilizations small rodents, sometimes working as serfs. They had the distressing immigrants —trickling south—entered the region of Central Mexico and the northern parts of Central of Mexico—to include the Olmecs, practice of taking other people’s wives. America—an area called by archaeologists, Mesoamerica. Teotihuacan, and Toltecs before them. A competing theory argues the Americas were populated much earlier—perhaps as early as 50,000 AD 1344 or 1345 Capital city Tenochtitlan founded. years ago. Without the aid of a land bridge from Asia, early humans had migrated to Australia by that After many years of being kicked out of one territory after another and eking out an existence near the marshes time—quite obviously by boat. While there are no artifacts to support this theory, the Americas, too, of the “Lake of the Moon,” the Aztecs fulfill a tribal prophecy by founding a home in the place where they see could have been reached by water and may have been populated much earlier than archaeological an eagle sitting on a cactus with a snake in its mouth. A tribal split occurs: one group forming under the evidence suggests. leadership of Chief Tenoch, founding Tenochtitlan (now Mexico City); the other settling in Tlatelolco to the north. ARCHAIC PERIOD (7,000 B.C–1800 B.C.) AD 1367 Aztecs serve as “soldiers for hire” for the aggressive Tepanec kingdom. Mesoamericans continue a life of hunting, fishing, and gathering. The Aztecs use their fighting prowess to help Chief Tezozomoc of the Tepanecs conquer the city-states of the Valley The hallmark of this period is the beginning of plant domestication. of Mexico. In return, the Aztecs gain important Tepanec military protection. AD 1375 First Aztec Ruler Acamapichtli (“Bundle of Reeds”) appointed by Tepanecs. PRECLASSIC PERIOD (1800 B.C.–A.D. 150) Formerly an egalitarian tribe with no social classes, the appointment of a formal ruler marks a shift in the structure of Mesoamericans begin living a settled agricultural life—growing maize, beans, and squash—in villages Aztec society from a tribal democracy to a modified monarchy. Over time the king is thought of as a divinity. throughout Mexico. Pottery and female figurines are widely evident. The Olmec peoples of Mexico’s south Gulf Coast—the “Mother Culture” of Mesoamerica—flourish during this period. AD 1426 A battle with the Tepanecs leads to Aztec victory making them the dominant power of Mexico. CLASSIC PERIOD (A.D. 150–A.D. 650) AD 1440 Reign of Montecuhzoma I (known to us as Montezuma) begins. During Montezuma’s During this Golden Age of Ancient Mexico, the great city of Teotihuacan was built. Teotihuacan reign, the Aztecs form an alliance (called The Triple Alliance) with two neighboring powers for the purpose of civilization rivals great centers of culture in other parts of the world. The city of Teotihuacan, after expanding their empire and gaining captives to sacrifice to the sun god, Huitzilopochtli. centuries-long dominance of Mesoamerica, is destroyed and burned in the 7th century by unknown invaders. It is still not understood who the Teotihuacanos were. While they left a lasting imprint on AD 1469 Montecuhzoma I dies after having greatly expanded the Aztec empire and established the culture of Mesoamerica, DNA testing of skeletal remains refutes a genetic link with the Toltec or Aztec a tribute system. His conquests are required to give maize, beans, amaranth, feather headdresses, peoples who came after them. and other items to support the Aztecs. POSTCLASSIC PERIOD (A.D. 900–A.D. 1521) AD 1502 Reign of Montecuhzoma II begins. He continues to expand the empire and enlarge the tribute domain until the Spanish arrive in 1519. The great civilizations of the Postclassic period are the Toltecs and the Aztecs. The Toltecs dominated central Mexico from the 10th through the 12th centuries A.D. Their capital was at Tula. Like the AD 1519 Hernan Cortes’s 11 ships land on the Gulf side of Mexico’s Central Valley. Aztecs who emerged after their decline, they spoke a language called Nahuatl. The Aztecs were the AD 1520 Montecuhzoma II is captured and dies in his palace while in Spanish custody. The cause ascendant culture of Ancient Mexico from roughly 1344 (with the founding of their capital at of death has never been determined. Tenochtitlan) until the Spanish captured the last Aztec king in 1521. AD 1521 Aztec civilization ends. The last Aztec emperor, Cuauhtemoc, is captured by the Spanish. Upon his capture, Cuauhtemoc surrenders bringing an end to the last independent civilization of Mesoamerica. 2 3 Copyright © 2006 Milliken Publishing Co. MP4830 Copyright © 2006 Milliken Publishing Co. MP4830 Timeline of ancient mexico Ancient Aztec timeline EARLY HUNTERS (18,000 B.C.–7,000 B.C) The timeline on the previous page places about AD 1200 Aztecs arrive in Central Mexico, Mesoamericans lead a nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle the Aztecs in the larger cultural and annoying everyone. historical context of Mesoamerica. The Archaeologists disagree about when early humans arrived in Central Mexico. One group believes the Aztecs appeared suddenly in the Valley Believed to be nomadic barbarians from the far northwest of Mexico, the Americas were populated between 20,000 and 30,000 years ago toward the end of the last Ice Age. of Mexico in the early 1200s Aztecs (called “the people whose face nobody knows”) arrive in the and from the early 1300s on were the With oceanic waters taken up by ice (rendering sea levels 200 feet lower than they are now), the first Central Valley. They are squatters, occupying land that does not belong to dominant culture for 200 years before immigrants are believed to have walked from Siberia to the western coast of Alaska over a wide swath them. For the next century or so, they wander the area, eating snakes and of land (now under water) connecting the two continents. Probably 10,000 or so years later, these the arrival of the Spanish. They were the last of the great pre-Conquest civilizations small rodents, sometimes working as serfs. They had the distressing immigrants —trickling south—entered the region of Central Mexico and the northern parts of Central of Mexico—to include the Olmecs, practice of taking other people’s wives. America—an area called by archaeologists, Mesoamerica. Teotihuacan, and Toltecs before them. A competing theory argues the Americas were populated much earlier—perhaps as early as 50,000 AD 1344 or 1345 Capital city Tenochtitlan founded. years ago. Without the aid of a land bridge from Asia, early humans had migrated to Australia by that After many years of being kicked out of one territory after another and eking out an existence near the marshes time—quite obviously by boat. While there are no artifacts to support this theory, the Americas, too, of the “Lake of the Moon,” the Aztecs fulfill a tribal prophecy by founding a home in the place where they see could have been reached by water and may have been populated much earlier than archaeological an eagle sitting on a cactus with a snake in its mouth. A tribal split occurs: one group forming under the evidence suggests. leadership of Chief Tenoch, founding Tenochtitlan (now Mexico City); the other settling in Tlatelolco to the north.
Recommended publications
  • The Gupta Empire: an Indian Golden Age the Gupta Empire, Which Ruled
    The Gupta Empire: An Indian Golden Age The Gupta Empire, which ruled the Indian subcontinent from 320 to 550 AD, ushered in a golden age of Indian civilization. It will forever be remembered as the period during which literature, science, and the arts flourished in India as never before. Beginnings of the Guptas Since the fall of the Mauryan Empire in the second century BC, India had remained divided. For 500 years, India was a patchwork of independent kingdoms. During the late third century, the powerful Gupta family gained control of the local kingship of Magadha (modern-day eastern India and Bengal). The Gupta Empire is generally held to have begun in 320 AD, when Chandragupta I (not to be confused with Chandragupta Maurya, who founded the Mauryan Empire), the third king of the dynasty, ascended the throne. He soon began conquering neighboring regions. His son, Samudragupta (often called Samudragupta the Great) founded a new capital city, Pataliputra, and began a conquest of the entire subcontinent. Samudragupta conquered most of India, though in the more distant regions he reinstalled local kings in exchange for their loyalty. Samudragupta was also a great patron of the arts. He was a poet and a musician, and he brought great writers, philosophers, and artists to his court. Unlike the Mauryan kings after Ashoka, who were Buddhists, Samudragupta was a devoted worshipper of the Hindu gods. Nonetheless, he did not reject Buddhism, but invited Buddhists to be part of his court and allowed the religion to spread in his realm. Chandragupta II and the Flourishing of Culture Samudragupta was briefly succeeded by his eldest son Ramagupta, whose reign was short.
    [Show full text]
  • Stear Dissertation COGA Submission 26 May 2015
    BEYOND THE FIFTH SUN: NAHUA TELEOLOGIES IN THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES By ©Copyright 2015 Ezekiel G. Stear Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Spanish and Portuguese and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson, Santa Arias ________________________________ Verónica Garibotto ________________________________ Patricia Manning ________________________________ Rocío Cortés ________________________________ Robert C. Schwaller Date Defended: May 6, 2015! ii The Dissertation Committee for Ezekiel G. Stear certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: BEYOND THE FIFTH SUN: NAHUA TELEOLOGIES IN THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES ________________________________ Chairperson, Santa Arias Date approved: May 6, 2015 iii Abstract After the surrender of Mexico-Tenochtitlan to Hernán Cortés and his native allies in 1521, the lived experiences of the Mexicas and other Nahuatl-speaking peoples in the valley of Mexico shifted radically. Indigenous elites during this new colonial period faced the disappearance of their ancestral knowledge, along with the imposition of Christianity and Spanish rule. Through appropriations of linear writing and collaborative intellectual projects, the native population, in particular the noble elite sought to understand their past, interpret their present, and shape their future. Nahua traditions emphasized balanced living. Yet how one could live out that balance in unknown times ahead became a topic of ongoing discussion in Nahua intellectual communities, and a question that resounds in the texts they produced. Writing at the intersections of Nahua studies, literary and cultural history, and critical theory, in this dissertation I investigate how indigenous intellectuals in Mexico-Tenochtitlan envisioned their future as part of their re-evaluations of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Renaissance to England's Golden
    HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY From the Martin Luther Renaissance to England’s Golden Age Reader Flying machine Queen Elizabeth I Printing press The Renaissance 1-89 The Reformation 91-145 England in the Golden Age 147-201 Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free: to Share—to copy, distribute, and transmit the work to Remix—to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution—You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation (www.coreknowledge.org) made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial—You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike—If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Copyright © 2017 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge®, Core Knowledge Curriculum Series™, Core Knowledge History and Geography™ and CKHG™ are trademarks of the Core Knowledge Foundation. Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are the property of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Bandelier's Contribution to the Study of Ancient- Mexican Social Organization
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS - -IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 249-282' February 10, 1917 BANDELIER'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ANCIENT- MEXICAN SOCIAL ORGANIZATION-: BY- T. T. WATERMAN *UNIVERSITY OF .CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY UNIVESITY Or CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS DEPARTMENT OF AN OPOLOGY The following publications dealing with archaeological and ethnological subjects- issued under the direction of the Department of Anthropology are sent in exchange for the publi- cations of anthropological departments and museums, and for joumals devoted to general anthropology or to archaeology and ethnology. They are for sale at the prices stated. Exchanges should be directed to The Exchange Department, University Library, Berkeley, California, U. S. A. All orders and remittances should be addressed to the University of California Press. European agent for the series in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Claasical Phil- ology, Education, Modern Philology, Philosophy, and Semitic Philology, Otto Harrassowits, Leipzig. For the series in Botany, Geology, Pathology, Physiology, Zoology and aLso Amer- ican Archaeology and Ethnology, R. Friedlaender & Sohn, Berlin. AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY.-A. L. Kroeber, Editor. Prices, Volume 1, $4.25; Volumes 2 to 11, inclusive, $3.50 each; Volume 12 and following $5.00 each. Cited as Univ. Calif. Publ. Arch. Ethn. Price Vol. 1. l. Life and Culture of the Hupa, by Pliny Earle- Goddard. Pp. 1-88; plates 1-30. September, 1903 ......................... $1.26 2. Hupa Texts, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 89-368. Xarch, 1904 ... 3.00 Index, pp. 369-378. VoL 2. 1. The Exploration of the Potter Creek Cave, by William J. Sinclair.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Cases of the Golden Age: the Hesiodic Utopia and the Platonic Ideal State
    TWO CASES OF THE GOLDEN AGE: THE HESIODIC UTOPIA AND THE PLATONIC IDEAL STATE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY GÜNEŞ VEZİR IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY SEPTEMBER 2019 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sadettin Kirazcı Director (Acting) I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Halil Turan Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Halil Turan Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Barış Parkan (METU, PHIL) Prof. Dr. Halil Turan (METU, PHIL) Assist. Prof. Dr. Refik Güremen (Mimar Sinan Fine Arts Uni., PHIL) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Güneş Vezir Signature : iii ABSTRACT TWO CASES OF THE GOLDEN AGE: THE HESIODIC UTOPIA AND THE PLATONIC IDEAL STATE Vezir, Güneş MA, Department of Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Halil Turan September 2019, 119 pages This study was prepared to give information about the Golden Age myth, and in this regard, to illustrate for what purposes and in which ways the myth is used by Hesiod and Plato and the interaction and similarities between these thinkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting and Accountability Strategies of Gajah Mada's
    IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF) e-ISSN: 2321-5933, p-ISSN: 2321-5925.Volume 5, Issue 6. Ver. I (Nov.-Dec. 2014), PP 19-24 www.iosrjournals.org Accounting and Accountability Strategies of Gajah Mada’s Government: Analysis of Power – Knowledge Calysta Dessi Rosyinadia1 , EG Sukoharsono2 , A Djamhuri3 1 Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Brawijaya. Malang-Indonesia 2 Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Brawijaya. Malang-Indonesia 3 Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Brawijaya. Malang-Indonesia Abstract: This study is aimed to more deeply analyze the history of accounting in Indonesia, particularly in the Majapahit empire in the reign of Gajah Mada as the mahapatih (Prime Minister). The role of Gajah Mada in the establishment of the unity of archipelago has a significant contribution to the development of the accounting ideas in Indonesia. In addition to the expansion of the territory expressed in the Palapa oath, Gajah Mada committed to his own mission to improve the economy of Majapahit Empire. Gajah Mada’s accounting strategy is one of successful strategy that formed Indonesian archipelago. In the age of Gajah Mada, Majapahit was one of the biggest ports with biggest warehouse in Asia frequently transited by foreigners from various countries. Moreover, Gajah Mada used his power to formulate legislation governing Majapahit taxes and penalties. In the Gajah Mada reign, Majapahit Empire is levied kinds of taxes, namely: (a) trade tax, (b) tax for foreigner, (c) exit-premit tax,(d) land tax, and (e) arts tax. Keywords: Gajah Mada, Accounting History of Indonesia, Foucault Power-Knowledge Framework I.
    [Show full text]
  • “Enclosures with Inclusion” Vis-À-Vis “Boundaries” in Ancient Mexico
    Ancient Mesoamerica, page 1 of 16, 2021 Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0956536121000043 “ENCLOSURES WITH INCLUSION” VIS-À-VIS “BOUNDARIES” IN ANCIENT MEXICO Amos Megged Department of General History, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31990, Israel Abstract Recent in-depth research on the Nahua Corpus Xolotl, as well as on a large variety of compatible sources, has led to new insights on what were “boundaries” in preconquest Nahua thought. The present article proposes that our modern Western concept of borders and political boundaries was foreign to ancient Mexican societies and to Aztec-era polities in general. Consequently, the article aims to add a novel angle to our understanding of the notions of space, territoriality, and limits in the indigenous worldview in central Mexico during preconquest times, and their repercussions for the internal social and political relations that evolved within the Nahua-Acolhua ethnic states (altepetl). Furthermore, taking its cue from the Corpus Xolotl, the article reconsiders the validity of ethnic entities and polities in ancient Mexico and claims that many of these polities were ethnic and territorial amalgams, in which components of ethnic outsiders formed internal enclaves and powerbases. I argue that in ancient Mexico one is able to observe yet another kind of conceptualization of borders/ frontiers: “enclosures with inclusion,” which served as the indigenous concept of porous and inclusive boundaries, well up to the era of the formation of the so-called Triple Alliance, and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER XIII AGE of QUEEN ANNE Synopsis : Introduction
    1 CHAPTER XIII AGE OF QUEEN ANNE Synopsis : Introduction - a period of great prosperity - the main cause for the prosperity - agricultural improvement - the social hierarchy - house building - decoration and furniture - educational system - marriage system - social vices of the time - sports and pastimes - means of transport - important industries - coffee house the centre of religious activities of the time -- the City of London and its administration - decline in the importance of the court. Queen Anne ruled England from 1702 to 1714. It was a golden age in the history of England because it was a period of great prosperity. Industry, agriculture and commerce all continued to prosper. Only during the last three years of her reign were there signs of distress and discontent, and that was chiefly due to the unavoidable war conditions in which the people had to live. This prosperity and content that prevailed all over the country was partly owing to good harvests and cheap food. English agriculture had improved so far that more wheat was grown than in medieval times. Wheat was the most important article of food. Rye, barley and oats came next in importance. In the reign of Anne there was a great exchange of agricultural products between one district and another. Thus the coasts of Sussex and Hampshire sent their corn. Cheshire and other western countries sent their cheese by sea to London. England's agricultural improvement during this regime was so much that she was able to send corn abroad on a large scale. Cattle. farming was also on its way of progress. The social hierarchy consisted of the Duke, the squire, the yeoman, the freeholder and the tenant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Age Angela Sorby Marquette University, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by epublications@Marquette Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette English Faculty Research and Publications English, Department of 1-1-2011 The Golden Age Angela Sorby Marquette University, [email protected] Published version "The Golden Age," in Keywords for Children's Literature. Eds. Philip Nel and Lissa Paul. New York: New York University Press, 2011: 96-99. Publisher link. © 2018 New York University Press. Used with permission. boundaries than in describing the underlying cultural 20 shift that allowed excellent children’s books to be pro- Golden Age duced. He sees Kenneth Grahame’s Golden Age (1895) as a watershed text: “Suddenly children were no lon- Angela Sorby ger being written down to any more—they were being The “Golden Age” is a Greco-Roman concept, intro- written up: you were enjoying spring in its own right duced in Hesiod’s Works and Days, which pictures and for itself, not looking on it anxiously as a prelude a race of men who “lived like gods without sorrow to summer.” It makes sense that Grahame and Green, of heart, remote and free from toil and grief: miser- as Oxford-educated Englishmen, would seize on a clas- able age rested not on them; but with legs and arms sical metaphor to describe the pastoral, pagan world of never failing they made merry with feasting beyond childhood. But it is vital to remember that this meta- the reach of all evils” (2007). In children’s literature, phor did not describe the whole world, but rather the the term was first proposed by the mid-twentieth cen- middle- and upper-middle-class strata of the British tury British biographer (and Inkling) Roger Lancelyn Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth Made Fact Lesson 7: Perseus with Dr
    Myth Made Fact Lesson 7: Perseus with Dr. Louis Markos Outline: The four greatest heroes of Greek mythology: Perseus Jason Theseus Hercules Setting Hesiod was a contemporary of Homer, late 8th century. Hesiod lived in Greece as a farmer. The four ages of man: o Golden Age: Live close to nature, close to the gods, and close to ourselves, a world before greed, before man cut open the earth for rare metals to kill each other o Silver Age: long youth that was happy, but they became violent and foolish and they were hidden under the earth o Bronze Age: men were warlike and fierce o Iron Age: this is the current age, far away from the Golden Age, we’ve lost a sense of shame and piety, we’ve lost our center and our balance o This concept is ubiquitous, that we are falling away. Hesiod adds a fifth age between the Bronze and Iron, and he calls it the age of heroes. There is almost a rebirth of the Golden Age with soldiers who fight for honor. This is when basically all of Greek mythology takes place (1500 BC – 1150 BC). o The Trojan War is the end of the Golden Age. o Every Greek tragedy takes place during that Golden Age, except a play about the Persian War, which is written as though the Persian war is taken place in a mythic Golden Age. Perseus Perseus is the son of Zeus. Acrisios heard a prophecy that Danae will give birth to a child who will kill him, so he locks Danae in a tower.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Age Sonnet: Metaphor and Metonymy, with a Difference
    THE GOLDEN AGE SONNET: METAPHOR AND METONYMY, WITH A DIFFERENCE Edward H. Friedman Indiana University n studies of Spanish Golden Age poetry, it is customary, and quite valid, it would seem, to seek elements that distinguish the so-called Irenaissance sonnet from the so-called baroque sonnet. Within this pro­ cess, Garcilaso de la Vega and, to a far lesser extent, Juan Boscan, serve to exemplify the Renaissance, and Gongora, Lope de Vega and Quevedo, the Baroque, with Fernando de Herrera occupying a transitional, medi­ ating—and, for some, mannerist—middle space. On a microcosmic level, two carpe diem sonnets—Garcilaso's "En tanto que de rasa y azucena" and Gongora's "Mientras por compear con tu cabello"—demonstrate the difference between the two extremes. Garcilaso elicits a connection—and, significantly, an equilibrium—between the beauty of nature and the beauty of the love object. Gongora seems consciously to violate the con­ ventional carpe diem concluding allusion to old age, as well as the theo­ logical comfort of eternal life, by contrasting the resplendence of youth with physical death. He thus disrupts the balance of nature and the bal­ ance of the intertext to make a poetic statement: his love object is superior to the world around her, but she is no less subject to decay, to destruction. Garcilaso's sonnet contains a commentary on the paradoxical nature of change; nothing is constant but mutability, the poet informs us. Gongora, for his part, effects a paradoxical contrast between the supernatural— divine, one could be led to believe—beauty of the woman and the mun­ dane fate that awaits her.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomaszewski, Brian M. & ME Smith
    Author's personal copy Journal of Historical Geography 37 (2011) 22e39 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Historical Geography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhg Polities, territory and historical change in Postclassic Matlatzinco (Toluca Valley, central Mexico) Brian M. Tomaszewski a,* and Michael E. Smith b a Department of Information Sciences & Technologies, Rochester Institute of Technology, 31 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA b School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA Abstract Historical interpretation of political dynamics in pre-conquest central Mexico from indigenous records is fraught with difficulties. Beyond the basic challenges involved in interpreting fragmentary evidence is the fact that the majority of evidence comes from the dominant imperial polity (Tenochtitlan) and paints a biased and overly generalized view of political and social dynamics in provincial areas. We present a reconstruction of the political geography of the Toluca Valley of central Mexico in Aztec times that avoids these biases by focusing not on the events described in native histories, but on the individual towns and their spatial locations. We find that a theoretical perspective that defines political entities by networks and relations among people more adequately captures the historical situation than traditional models that define polities based on territory and boundaries. Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Political process; Polities; Ancient States; Borders; Toluca Valley; Mexico Reconstructing the pre-European political situation in central control of geographical space was continually contested between Mexico presents a challenge for research in historical geography. the native Matlatzinca people of the Toluca Valley and a series of Beyond obvious practical problems of fragmentary written outside imperial polities, including the Tepanecs, the Aztec Triple evidence are three inter-related conceptual challenges.
    [Show full text]