Two Cases of the Golden Age: the Hesiodic Utopia and the Platonic Ideal State

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Two Cases of the Golden Age: the Hesiodic Utopia and the Platonic Ideal State TWO CASES OF THE GOLDEN AGE: THE HESIODIC UTOPIA AND THE PLATONIC IDEAL STATE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY GÜNEŞ VEZİR IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY SEPTEMBER 2019 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sadettin Kirazcı Director (Acting) I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Halil Turan Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Halil Turan Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Barış Parkan (METU, PHIL) Prof. Dr. Halil Turan (METU, PHIL) Assist. Prof. Dr. Refik Güremen (Mimar Sinan Fine Arts Uni., PHIL) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Güneş Vezir Signature : iii ABSTRACT TWO CASES OF THE GOLDEN AGE: THE HESIODIC UTOPIA AND THE PLATONIC IDEAL STATE Vezir, Güneş MA, Department of Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Halil Turan September 2019, 119 pages This study was prepared to give information about the Golden Age myth, and in this regard, to illustrate for what purposes and in which ways the myth is used by Hesiod and Plato and the interaction and similarities between these thinkers. In the Golden Age, Cronus was the ruler and the order of the universe and human life are under the direct control of daemons. It is told that people of this time lived a blessed life in abundance and happiness; they were contented with what the land offers them and free from work, evils, war and unhappiness. The period ended with dethronement of Cronus by his son Zeus; after, as the order of the universe gradually deteriorated, humanity also became increasingly degenerate. The myth of the Golden Age, which Hesiod put forward as a utopic example for the solution of contemporary moral, social and political problems, also influenced Plato's political philosophy in the 4th century BC; guiding him through his search for the ideal state and the ideal ruler, and gained an important place in his dialogues. Firstly, in this thesis, the origins of the Golden Age myth, its appearances in the Ancient Greek and Roman cultures, the supporting and opposing views on the myth were explained. In the following chapter, the place of the Golden Age within the Five Ages myth of Works and Days, how it was utilized by Hesiod with ethical and political concerns and whether the narrative iv belong originally to Hesiod were examined. Finally, the function of the exemplification of the myth in the Statesman and the Laws and its modelity in Plato's construction of the ideal state were investigated, and Hesiod’s influence on Plato was discussed. Keywords: Golden Age, Hesiod, Works and Days, Plato, The Statesman, The Laws. v ÖZ ALTIN ÇAĞ’IN İKİ HALİ: HESİODİK ÜTOPYA VE PLATONİK İDEAL DEVLET Vezir, Güneş Yüksek Lisans, Felsefe Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Halil Turan Eylül 2019, 119 sayfa Bu çalışma, Altın Çağ miti hakkında bilgilendirme yapmak, mitin Hesiodos ve Platon tarafından hangi şekillerde ve hangi amaçlarla kullanıldığını incelemek ve iki düşünürün bu husustaki etkileşim ve benzerlikleri göstermek üzere hazırlanmıştır. Yazılı olarak ilk kez Hesiodos’un İşler ve Günler eserinde karşılaşılan Altın Çağ miti pek çok farklı kültürde kendine yer edinmiş olmasına rağmen en güçlü görünümünü Yunan mitolojisinde bulmuştur. Tanrı Kronos’un egemen olduğu Altın Çağ’da evrenin düzeni ve insan hayatı tanrıların birebir kontrolündedir. Bu çağda insanların bolluk ve mutluluk içerisinde, toprağın verimlilikle kendilerine sundukları ile yetinerek, çalışmadan, kavgadan, savaş ve mutsuzluktan azade kutlu bir yaşam sürdükleri anlatılır. Dönem, Kronos’un yerine oğlu Zeus’un geçmesi ile son bulur ve sonrasında evrenin düzeni git gide bozulurken insanlar da yavaş yavaş yozlaşmaya başlarlar. Hesiodos’un güncel ahlaki, toplumsal ve siyasi problemlerin çözümü için ütopik bir örnek olarak ileri sürdüğü Altın Çağ miti M.Ö. 4. Yüzyıl’da Platon’un siyaset felsefesini etkileyerek ideal devlet düzeni ve ideal yönetici arayışında yol gösterici olmuş ve diyaloglarında önemli bir yer edinmiştir. İlk olarak Altın Çağ mitinin kökeni, Antik Yunan ve Roma kültürlerindeki görünümleri, mit üzerine sunulan olumlu ve olumsuz görüşlerin anlatıldığı bu tezin sonraki bölümünde, vi öncelikle mitin İşler ve Günler’de bahsi geçen Beş Çağ miti içerisindeki yerinden söz edilmiş, sonrasında mitin Hesiodos tarafından etik ve politik kaygılarla ne şekilde kullanıldığı ve anlatının orijinalinde Hesiodos’a ait olup olmadığı incelenmiştir. Son olarak Devlet Adamı ve Yasalar diyaloglarında yer alan Altın Çağ anlatısının Platon’un ideal devlet kurgusu için oluşturduğu örneklik ve Hesiodos’un Platon üzerindeki etkisi tartışılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Altın Çağ, Hesiodos, İşler ve Günler, Platon, Devlet Adamı, Yasalar. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Dr. Halil Turan for his support and guidance during this study. I also thank my committee members Assist. Prof. Dr. Refik Güremen and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Barış Parkan for their valuable suggestions and contributions. I cannot possibly thank enough to my beloved mother and father who supported me in every aspect of life, trusted me in my choices, encouraged me, helped me to overcome difficult times and above all raised me as a compassionate person. It is my good fortune to have such great parents and I am deeply grateful for your love and care. I owe special thanks to my dearest friends Gökçen Keskin, Tuğçe Arslan, Zöhre Koçkan and Bilge Yıldırım for being both my companions and my mentors, for patiently enduring my endless dramas, for soothing me, for guiding me through my decision makings, for showing me the right paths when I detached from reality and for being there for me no matter what. I feel extremely lucky to have you in my life. Loads of kisses and hugs and squeezes and many other Elmyraean things for my beautiful babies Emil and Lüplüp for always lightening up my days, for being so fluffy and sweet. I am very happy and proud to be your human. I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to nature and stray animals for uplifting me whenever I felt sad or helpless. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM ............................................................................................................ iii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ iv ÖZ…. .......................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................... viii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ ix CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2. THE GOLDEN AGE ............................................................................................... 7 2.1. The Myth ................................................................................................. 7 2.2. Theories About the Origins of the Golden Age ...................................... 8 2.3. Kings of the Golden Age: Cronus and Saturn ...................................... 10 2.3.1. Cronus the Greek God ................................................................ 11 2.3.2. Saturn the Roman God ................................................................ 13 2.4. The Development of the Golden Age in Greek and Roman Cultures and Several Approaches to the Myth ........................................................... 14 2.4.1. The Golden Age as a Utopia ....................................................... 14 2.4.2. Opposing Remarks ...................................................................... 18 3. HESIOD: THE FIVE AGES MYTH AND THE GOLDEN AGE IN WORKS AND DAYS ........................................................................................................ 22 3.1. An Overview of Hesiod and His Works ............................................... 22 3.1.1. Theogony ..................................................................................... 24 ix 3.1.2. Works and Days .......................................................................... 26 3.2. The Myth of the Five Ages in Works and Days .................................... 29 3.2.1. The Heroic Age ........................................................................... 29 3.2.2. Metallic Nomenclature ................................................................ 33 3.3. On Originality of Hesiod ....................................................................... 35 3.4. Hesiod’s Objectives for Utilizing the Golden Age Myth in Works and Days ............................................................................................................. 41 3.4.1. Morality ....................................................................................... 41 3.4.2. Politics and Economy ................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Myth, Metatext, Continuity and Cataclysm in Dc Comics’ Crisis on Infinite Earths
    WORLDS WILL LIVE, WORLDS WILL DIE: MYTH, METATEXT, CONTINUITY AND CATACLYSM IN DC COMICS’ CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS Adam C. Murdough A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2006 Committee: Angela Nelson, Advisor Marilyn Motz Jeremy Wallach ii ABSTRACT Angela Nelson, Advisor In 1985-86, DC Comics launched an extensive campaign to revamp and revise its most important superhero characters for a new era. In many cases, this involved streamlining, retouching, or completely overhauling the characters’ fictional back-stories, while similarly renovating the shared fictional context in which their adventures take place, “the DC Universe.” To accomplish this act of revisionist history, DC resorted to a text-based performative gesture, Crisis on Infinite Earths. This thesis analyzes the impact of this singular text and the phenomena it inspired on the comic-book industry and the DC Comics fan community. The first chapter explains the nature and importance of the convention of “continuity” (i.e., intertextual diegetic storytelling, unfolding progressively over time) in superhero comics, identifying superhero fans’ attachment to continuity as a source of reading pleasure and cultural expressivity as the key factor informing the creation of the Crisis on Infinite Earths text. The second chapter consists of an eschatological reading of the text itself, in which it is argued that Crisis on Infinite Earths combines self-reflexive metafiction with the ideologically inflected symbolic language of apocalypse myth to provide DC Comics fans with a textual "rite of transition," to win their acceptance for DC’s mid-1980s project of self- rehistoricization and renewal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic Myths of Homer and Hesiod
    Oral Tradition, 2/1 (1987): 31-53 The Cosmic Myths of Homer and Hesiod Eric A. Havelock I HOMER’S COSMIC IMAGERY Embedded in the narratives of the Homeric poems are a few passages which open windows on the ways in which the Homeric poet envisioned the cosmos around him. They occur as brief digressions, offering powerful but by no means consistent images, intruding into the narrative and then vanishing from it, but always prompted by some suitable context. A. Iliad 5.748-52 and 768-69 The Greeks in battle being pressed hard by the Trojans, assisted by the god Ares; the goddesses Hera and Athene decide to equalize the encounter by descending from Olympus to help the Greeks. A servant assembles the components of Hera’s chariot: body, wheels, spokes, axle, felloe, tires, naves, platform, rails, pole, yoke are all itemized in sequence, comprising a formulaic account of a mechanical operation: Hera herself attaches the horses to the car. Athene on her side is provided by the poet with a corresponding “arming scene”; she fi nally mounts the chariot and the two of them proceed: 748 Hera swiftly with whip set upon the horses 749 and self-moving the gates of heaven creaked, which the seasons kept 750 to whom is committed great heaven and Olympus 751 either to swing open the thick cloud or to shut it back. 752 Straight through between them they kept the horses goaded-and-driven. 32 ERIC A. HAVELOCK 768 Hera whipped up the horses, and the pair unhesitant fl ew on 769 in midspace between earth and heaven star-studded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quarrel with Perses and Hesiod's Biographical Tradition
    The Quarrel with Perses and Hesiod’s Biographical Tradition Zoe Stamatopoulou CHOLARS OF ANCIENT BIOGRAPHY have amply demon- strated that biographical traditions regarding Greek poets S draw information about their genealogies, lives, and careers from their works.1 The few extant Hesiodic biographies are no exception.2 These bioi have appropriated and further elaborated information that is presented in Hesiodic poetry as autobiographical, such as the poet’s encounter with the Muses on Helicon (Theog. 22–34), his victory at the poetic competition in Chalkis (Op. 650–662), and his father’s migration to Ascra (Op. 633–640). Given how meticulously and consistently Hesi- odic poetry is used as a source of biographical material, it is 1 J. Fairweather, “Fiction in the Biographies of Ancient Writers,” AncSoc 5 (1974) 231–276; M. R. Lefkowitz, The Lives of the Greek Poets2 (Baltimore 2012: 1London 1981); B. Graziosi, Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic (Cambridge 2002); G. Nagy, “Hesiod and the Ancient Biographical Tradi- tions,” in F. Montanari et al. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hesiod (Leiden 2009) 271–311; M. Kivilo, Early Greek Poets’ Lives. The Shaping of the Tradition (Leiden 2010). 2 We have a short and concise summary of the poet’s life in the Suda (η 583) and a more extensive Hesiodic bios in the Prolegomena to the Works and the Days by Tzetzes. On Gaisford’s misattribution of the latter to Proclus see E. Abel, “Zum Γένος Ἡσιόδου des Ioannes Tzetzes,” WS 11 (1889) 88–93, and A. Colonna, “I Prolegomeni ad Esiodo e la vita esiodea di Giovanni Tzetzes,” BPEC N.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Didactic Poetry: the Hellenistic Invention of a Pre-Existing Genre
    in Richard Hunter, Antonios Rengakos, and Evina Sistakou (eds.), Hellenistic Studies at a Crossroads: Exploring Texts, Contexts and Metatexts, Trends in Classics, Supplementary Volume 25 (Berlin 2014) David Sider Didactic poetry: The Hellenistic invention of a pre-existing genre For all that it is almost a cliché that Hellenistic poets were acutely aware of genre —who before Callimachus would or could have boasted of his πολυείδεια?—,¹ discussions, let alone definitions, of didactic poetry as a genre are scarce. Why bother, when it seems so obvious? Look at Aratus and Nicander, whose model was Hesiod, and nothing more need be said. Nonetheless, that will be my aim here. There have of course been many useful studies of classical didactic poetry,² some of which offer various classifications (see below); yet I have long felt that insufficient attention has been paid, both by the ancients themselves and by us today, to the development of the poems called didactic, although modern termi- nology and the ancients are not in complete agreement as to what constitutes a Bibliography at end. Some earlier poets did in fact write in more than one genre, but could have boasted of it only in particular terms, i.e., by specifying “I write poems of type X and Y,” as we see at the end of the Symposium 223d ὁμολογεῖναὐτοὺςτοῦαὐτοῦἀνδρὸςεἶναι κωμῳδίαν καὶ τραγῳδίαν ἐπίστασθαι ποιεῖν, καὶ τὸν τέχνῃ τραγῳδοποιὸν ὄντα <καὶ> κωμῳδοποιὸνεἶναι (“They agreed that the same man can know how to compose both comedy and tragedy, and that the skilled tragic poet is also a skilled writer of comedies”)—to which one can add that Plato has himself done this within this very dialogue, adding satyrography, as Bacon (1959) shows.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Paradise Ekkehardt Mueller
    A New Paradise Ekkehardt Mueller There is hardly a human being that does not long for peace, fulfillment, harmony, and happiness or, in other words, for some type of a paradise. The Greek talked about Elysium, the land of the blessed, in which good people would be able to live without worries. Germanic tribes dreamed about Valhalla, a splendid palace, where the warriors would feast on the flesh of boars and drink liquor. They would spent their days with sports, fighting, and hunting. Muslims are looking forward to a garden with abundant food to eat, wine to drink, and noble virgins to serve them. Many have tried or are still trying to create a paradise of their own on this earth. In any case, many yearn for complete satisfaction and perfect bliss. The first two chapters of Scripture talk about a paradise that humanity has lost, the last two chapters about a paradise which we may gain. I. Time and Place of the New Paradise • Rev. 20-21 After the Millennium, when Satan and his followers will be destroyed, a new heaven and a new earth will be created (Rev. 21:1). • Rev. 21:1-2 The new paradise will be found on planet earth, probably because it was here that the drama of redemption unfolded, and it was here that Jesus had lived and had been crucified. II. The Features of the New Paradise 1. The City (Rev. 21:10-27) The New Jerusalem reminds us of the garden of Eden and the temple, and it replaces both. In addition, it is found in stark contrast to the great, but wicked city Babylon (Rev 18:10, 21).
    [Show full text]
  • Poetic Authority and Oral Tradition in Hesiod and Pindar
    CHAPTER SIX POETIC AUTHORITY AND ORAL TRADITION IN HESIOD AND PINDAR Ruth Scodel Elsewhere, I have discussed the distinction Homer makes, especially in the Odyssey, between the songs of bards and other storytelling.1 This argument rests especially on three recent insights that appear to point in quite opposite directions. First, Andrew Ford shows in Homer: the Poetry of the Past how the Odyssey evades the reality of the transmission of poetic tradition as well as that of bardic contests. The Muses simply replace poets’ teachers; the narrative content of per- formance has no naturalistic source.2 S. Douglas Olson has shown in Blood and Iron how richly the same epic depicts the workings of everyday oral tradition, its considerable interest in how news gets around.3 Third, Louise Pratt argues convincingly that the truth-claims of early Greek poetry need to be interpreted relative to their rhetor- ical functions in context. While only fables are truly fiction, for most poetic narrative historical accuracy is not the primary concern.4 Homer, then, shows how people in reality create and spread kleos, but he seems to want to avoid facing the obvious implication that poetic performances depend on what earlier storytellers have trans- mitted. The proem to the Catalogue of Ships perfectly demonstrates this peculiarity in its distinction between the Muses, who see and hear everything, and poet and audience, who only hear the kleos and know nothing (Il. 2.484–93). So in asking why Homer does not acknowledge openly that his stories depend on tradition, I looked at what distinguishes bardic performances from other storytelling prac- tices in Homer, and concluded that the most important distinctions 1 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Death and the Afterlife in Homer
    Death and the Afterlife in Homer Death and what happens after death are universal concerns for humanity; around the world different cultures and religions contemplate our existence, and try to make sense of both our place in the world and our deaths. Although we no longer (for the most part) follow the religious beliefs of the ancient Greeks and Romans, their exploration of mortality and the afterlife can nonetheless be emotionally powerful and meaningful for us. In what follows, we will consider the presentation of death and the afterlife in some of the earliest Greek literature, Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey. The most common name for the underworld was Hades, a personified god and brother of Zeus, but also a place to which the souls of departed mortals go. Hades is in fact far more commonly mentioned as the underworld than as a personified god in Greek literature, although we do see him as an actual character in some myths, most famously in the story of the abduction of Persesphone by Hades, a tale told in the Homeric Hymn to Demeter. In post-classical times, the term Hades was adopted by Christian authors, including the early Church Fathers, Dante and Milton, to refer to the Christian concept of Hell. The term used is the same, but it is important to distinguish between the Christian conception of Hell and Hades. For Christians, Hell is a place to which the souls of the wicked descend after death, whereas the souls of the good are taken to Heaven to be with God. The ancient Greek concept is extremely different.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Age of Athens Bellringer: According to Pericles, What Attributes Made Athens Great?
    The Golden Age of Athens Bellringer: According to Pericles, what attributes made Athens great? “...we have not forgotten to provide for our weary spirits many relaxations from toil; we have regular games and sacrifices throughout the year; our homes are beautiful and elegant; and the delight which we daily feel in all these things helps to banish sorrow. Because of the greatness of our city, the fruits of the whole earth flow in upon us; so that we enjoy the goods of other countries as freely as our own...To sum up: I say that Athens is the school of Hellas (Greece)...Such is the city for whose sake these men nobly fought and died…” - Pericles, Funeral Oration, in History of the Peloponnesian Wars by Thucydides Bellringer According to what we learned yesterday, why was the time period we’re studying considered a “Golden Age” for Athens? Bellringer The Greeks had contact with many different cultures throughout the ancient world. How did the Egyptians influence Greek culture? FLASHBACK! Why was the development of AGRICULTURE and DOMESTICATION of animals important? How did it change the way humans lived? Objective I can describe the Golden Age of Athens Bellringer After the events of the Persian Wars, Athens was in a state of destruction and had been ruthlessly destroyed by the armies of Xerxes. However, the years following the wars were a “golden age” for Athens. Why might this have happened? Objective I can analyze secondary sources about Ancient Greece The Greeks: Crucible of Civilization ● Pay attention and be respectful ● As you watch, answer the analysis questions (front side) ● Identify important people mentioned throughout (back side) The Parthenon: Design and Architecture ● Pay attention and be respectful ● As you watch, record contributions of Athenian culture to the US ● Differences of building techniques/Similarities between artisans ● Answer Analysis questions Learning Target Review Guide and Learning Stations ● Get your laptop from the cart.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cratylus to Aristotle
    From Cratylus to Aristotle Article by Martha Keltz Heraclitus and Cratylus – From the Sixth to the Fifth Century Before Christ Heraclitus, Cratylus and the Essenes “The name of John is connected with the city of Ephesus, and equipped with Imaginative insight into world history, he is continually referred back along an inner path to the ancient temple of Diana of Ephesus, and confronts these significant words: 'In the primal Beginning was the Logos. And the Logos was with God. And the Logos was a God. “ ...When the evangelist could read about Ephesus in the Akasha Record, could read that for which his heart thirsted, [he found] the right form in which to clothe what he wanted to say to humanity concerning the mystery of the beginning of the world.” - Rudolf Steiner , Mystery Centers. “Thus we show how Eabani [from The Epic of Gilgamesh ], in the incarnation between the life as Eabani and the life as Aristotle, was able under the influence of the ancient Mystery teachings, into which forces streamed from the supersensible worlds, to imbibe the principles which in certain Mystery schools were essential to the further development of the human soul... In such Mystery schools the feelings and impulses paramountly awakened were those capable of eradicating every trace of egoism from the soul... In the Mysteries to which I am here referring, the soul had to learn to feel pity and compassion for everything human, for everything cosmic – compassion born from the overcoming of the physical plane.” - Occult History . The life between Eabani and Aristotle was that of Cratylus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gupta Empire: an Indian Golden Age the Gupta Empire, Which Ruled
    The Gupta Empire: An Indian Golden Age The Gupta Empire, which ruled the Indian subcontinent from 320 to 550 AD, ushered in a golden age of Indian civilization. It will forever be remembered as the period during which literature, science, and the arts flourished in India as never before. Beginnings of the Guptas Since the fall of the Mauryan Empire in the second century BC, India had remained divided. For 500 years, India was a patchwork of independent kingdoms. During the late third century, the powerful Gupta family gained control of the local kingship of Magadha (modern-day eastern India and Bengal). The Gupta Empire is generally held to have begun in 320 AD, when Chandragupta I (not to be confused with Chandragupta Maurya, who founded the Mauryan Empire), the third king of the dynasty, ascended the throne. He soon began conquering neighboring regions. His son, Samudragupta (often called Samudragupta the Great) founded a new capital city, Pataliputra, and began a conquest of the entire subcontinent. Samudragupta conquered most of India, though in the more distant regions he reinstalled local kings in exchange for their loyalty. Samudragupta was also a great patron of the arts. He was a poet and a musician, and he brought great writers, philosophers, and artists to his court. Unlike the Mauryan kings after Ashoka, who were Buddhists, Samudragupta was a devoted worshipper of the Hindu gods. Nonetheless, he did not reject Buddhism, but invited Buddhists to be part of his court and allowed the religion to spread in his realm. Chandragupta II and the Flourishing of Culture Samudragupta was briefly succeeded by his eldest son Ramagupta, whose reign was short.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Religion and the Tradition of Myth Religion
    Greek Religion and The Tradition of Myth Religion • Religion • An institutionalized system of rituals. • An institution is a “system of ideas whose object is to explain the world” (Durkheim, 1965: 476). • Spiritualism • A belief in forces that exist outside of space and time but that can act within those domains Culture and Belief • “Religion is sociologically interesting not because, as vulgar positivism would have it, it describes the social order...but because... it shapes it” (Geertz 1973, 119). • “The social function of myth is to bind together social groups as wholes or, in other words, to establish a social consensus” (Halpern 1961, 137). Mythos • Archaic Greek: a story, speech, utterance. • Essentially declarative in nature • Classical Greek: An unsubstantiated claim • Mythographos • Logographos • Logopoios Modern Definitions • “…Myth is defined as a complex of traditional tales in which significant human situations are united in fantastic combinations to form a polyvalent semiotic system which is used in multifarious ways to illuminate reality…” • (Burkert 1985: 120). • “A traditional story with collective importance” • (Powell, 2009: 2) Logos • An argument • A statement or story based on comparative evaluation or collection of data • The result of a process • A study • Bio-logy, Socio-logy, mytho-logy • Powell: • logos is defined by authorship, it has a known origin, • mythos is anonymous, it exists in a social milieu undefined by its origin Truth and Falsehood • “The poet and the historian differ not by writing in verse or in prose… The true difference is that one relates what has happened, the other what may happen. Poetry, therefore, is a more philosophical and a higher thing than history: for poetry tends to express the universal, history the particular.” • (Aristotle Poetics 1451a.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Arrangement of the Platonic Dialogues
    Ryan C. Fowler 25th Hour On the Arrangement of the Platonic Dialogues I. Thrasyllus a. Diogenes Laertius (D.L.), Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers 3.56: “But, just as long ago in tragedy the chorus was the only actor, and afterwards, in order to give the chorus breathing space, Thespis devised a single actor, Aeschylus a second, Sophocles a third, and thus tragedy was completed, so too with philosophy: in early times it discoursed on one subject only, namely physics, then Socrates added the second subject, ethics, and Plato the third, dialectics, and so brought philosophy to perfection. Thrasyllus says that he [Plato] published his dialogues in tetralogies, like those of the tragic poets. Thus they contended with four plays at the Dionysia, the Lenaea, the Panathenaea and the festival of Chytri. Of the four plays the last was a satiric drama; and the four together were called a tetralogy.” b. Characters or types of dialogues (D.L. 3.49): 1. instructive (ὑφηγητικός) A. theoretical (θεωρηµατικόν) a. physical (φυσικόν) b. logical (λογικόν) B. practical (πρακτικόν) a. ethical (ἠθικόν) b. political (πολιτικόν) 2. investigative (ζητητικός) A. training the mind (γυµναστικός) a. obstetrical (µαιευτικός) b. tentative (πειραστικός) B. victory in controversy (ἀγωνιστικός) a. critical (ἐνδεικτικός) b. subversive (ἀνατρεπτικός) c. Thrasyllan categories of the dialogues (D.L. 3.50-1): Physics: Timaeus Logic: Statesman, Cratylus, Parmenides, and Sophist Ethics: Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus, Symposium, Menexenus, Clitophon, the Letters, Philebus, Hipparchus, Rivals Politics: Republic, the Laws, Minos, Epinomis, Atlantis Obstetrics: Alcibiades 1 and 2, Theages, Lysis, Laches Tentative: Euthyphro, Meno, Io, Charmides and Theaetetus Critical: Protagoras Subversive: Euthydemus, Gorgias, and Hippias 1 and 2 :1 d.
    [Show full text]