DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:Gr-Qc/0112028V3 28 May 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:Gr-Qc/0112028V3 28 May 2002 Sergiu Vacaru and Panayiotis Stavrinos SPINORS and SPACE–TIME ANISOTROPY arXiv:gr-qc/0112028v3 28 May 2002 University of Athens, 2002 ————————————————— c Sergiu Vacaru and Panyiotis Stavrinos ii ... iii ABOUT THE BOOK This is the first monograph on the geometry of anisotropic spinor spaces and its applications in modern physics. The main subjects are the theory of grav- ity and matter fields in spaces provided with off–diagonal metrics and asso- ciated anholonomic frames and nonlinear connection structures, the algebra and geometry of distinguished anisotropic Clifford and spinor spaces, their extension to spaces of higher order anisotropy and the geometry of gravity and gauge theories with anisotropic spinor variables. The book summarizes the authors’ results and can be also considered as a pedagogical survey on the mentioned subjects. iv - v ABOUT THE AUTHORS Sergiu Ion Vacaru was born in 1958 in the Republic of Moldova. He was educated at the Universities of the former URSS (in Tomsk, Moscow, Dubna and Kiev) and reveived his PhD in theoretical physics in 1994 at ”Al. I. Cuza” University, Ia¸si, Romania. He was employed as principal senior researcher, as- sociate and full professor and obtained a number of NATO/UNESCO grants and fellowships at various academic institutions in R. Moldova, Romania, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal and USA. He has published in English two scientific monographs, a university text–book and more than hundred scientific works (in English, Russian and Romanian) on (super) gravity and string theories, extra–dimension and brane gravity, black hole physics and cosmolgy, exact solutions of Einstein equations, spinors and twistors, anistoropic stochastic and kinetic processes and thermodynamics in curved spaces, generalized Finsler (super) geometry and gauge gravity, quantum field and geometric methods in condensed matter physics. Panayiotis Stavrinos is Assistant Professor in the University of Athens, where he obtained his Ph. D in 1990. He teaches some courses on Dif- ferential Geometry in the Department of Mathematics and Applications of Differential Geometry to Physics in the Department of Physics. He also su- pervises undergraduate these ans graduate researches at the University of Athens. He is a Founding Member and Vice President of the Balkan So- ciety of Geometers, Member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of the Balkan Society, Honorary Member to The Research Board of Advisors of the American Biographical Institute (U.S.A.), 1996, and Member of the Tensor Society, (Japan), 1981. Dr. Stavrinos has published over 40 research papers in international Journals on The topics of local differential geometry, Finsler and Lagrange geometry, applications of Finsler and Lagrange geometry to gravitation, gauge and spinor theory as well as Einstein equations, devia- tion of geodesics, tidal forces, weak gravitational fields, gravitational waves. He is co-author of the monograph ”Introduction to the Physical Principles of Differential Geometry”, in Russian, published in St. Petersburg in 1996 (second edition in English, University of Athens Press, 2000). He has pub- lished two monographs in Greek for undergraduate and graduate students in the Department of Mathematics and Physics: ”Differential Geometry and its Applications”, Vol. I, II (University of Athens Press, 2000). vi — Contents 0.1 Preface...............................xiii 0.1.1 Historical remarks on spinor theory . xiii 0.1.2 Nonlinear connection geometry and physics . xv 0.1.3 Anholonomic frames and N–connections in Einstein gravity . xviii 0.1.4 Metrics depending on spinor variables and gauge theories xx 0.1.5 The layout of the book . xxii 0.1.6 Acknowledgments . xxiii 0.2 Notation..............................xxv I Space–Time Anisotropy 1 1 Vector Bundles and N–Connections 3 1.1 VectorandCovectorBundles . 4 1.1.1 Vectorandtangentbundles . 4 1.1.2 Covector and cotangent bundles . 5 1.1.3 Higher order vector/covector bundles . 6 1.2 NonlinearConnections . 10 1.2.1 N–connections in vector bundles . 10 1.2.2 N–connections in covector bundles: . 11 1.2.3 N–connections in higher order bundles . 12 1.2.4 Anholonomic frames and N–connections . 13 1.3 Distinguished connections and metrics . 19 1.3.1 D–connections....................... 19 1.3.2 Metricstructure. .. .. 22 1.3.3 Someremarkabled–connections . 25 1.3.4 Amost Hermitian anisotropic spaces . 27 1.4 TorsionsandCurvatures. 29 1.4.1 N–connectioncurvature . 29 1.4.2 d–Torsions in v- and cv–bundles . 30 1.4.3 d–Curvatures in v- and cv–bundles . 31 vii viii CONTENTS 1.5 Generalizations of Finsler Spaces . 32 1.5.1 FinslerSpaces....................... 32 1.5.2 Lagrange and Generalized Lagrange Spaces . 34 1.5.3 CartanSpaces....................... 35 1.5.4 Generalized Hamilton and Hamilton Spaces . 37 1.6 GravityonVectorBundles . 38 2 Anholonomic Einstein and Gauge Gravity 41 2.1 Introduction............................ 41 2.2 AnholonomicFrames ....................... 42 2.3 HigherOrderAnisotropicStructures . 48 2.3.1 Ha–frames and corresponding N–connections . 48 2.3.2 Distinguished linear connections . 52 2.3.3 Ha–torsionsandha–curvatures . 54 2.3.4 Einstein equations with respect to ha–frames . 55 2.4 GaugeFieldsonHa–Spaces . 56 2.4.1 Bundlesonha–spaces. 57 2.4.2 Yang-Mills equations on ha-spaces . 60 2.5 GaugeHa-gravity......................... 63 2.5.1 Bundles of linear ha–frames . 64 2.5.2 Bundles of affine ha–frames and Einstein equations . 65 2.6 Nonlinear De Sitter Gauge Ha–Gravity . 66 2.6.1 Nonlinear gauge theories of de Sitter group . 67 2.6.2 Dynamics of the nonlinear de Sitter ha–gravity . 69 2.7 AnAnsatzfor4Dd–Metrics . 72 2.7.1 Theh–equations ..................... 74 2.7.2 Thev–equations ..................... 75 2.7.3 H–vequations....................... 76 2.8 Anisotropic Cosmological Solutions . 77 2.8.1 Rotation ellipsoid FRW universes . 77 2.8.2 ToroidalFRWuniverses . 79 2.9 ConcludingRemarks....................... 80 3 Anisotropic Taub NUT – Dirac Spaces 85 3.1 N–connections in General Relativity . 85 3.1.1 Anholonomic Einstein–Dirac Equations . 88 3.1.2 Anisotropic Taub NUT – Dirac Spinor Solutions . 94 3.2 Anisotropic Taub NUT Solutions . 96 3.2.1 A conformal transform of the Taub NUT metric . 97 3.2.2 Anisotropic Taub NUT solutions with magnetic polar- ization........................... 99 CONTENTS ix 3.3 Anisotropic Taub NUT–Dirac Fields . 101 3.3.1 Dirac fields and angular polarizations . 101 3.3.2 Dirac fields and extra dimension polarizations . 103 3.4 Anholonomic Dirac–Taub NUT Solitons . 104 3.4.1 Kadomtsev–Petviashvili type solitons . 105 3.4.2 (2+1) sine–Gordon type solitons . 106 II Anisotropic Spinors 109 4 Anisotropic Clifford Structures 113 4.1 Distinguished Clifford Algebras . 113 4.2 Anisotropic Clifford Bundles . 118 4.2.1 Clifford d-module structure . 118 4.2.2 Anisotropic Clifford fibration . 120 4.3 AlmostComplexSpinors . .121 5 Spinors and Anisotropic Spaces 127 5.1 AnisotropicSpinorsandTwistors . 128 5.2 Mutual Transforms ofTensors and Spinors. 133 5.2.1 Transformation of d-tensors into d-spinors . 133 5.2.2 Fundamentald–spinors . .134 5.3 Anisotropic Spinor Differential Geometry . 135 5.4 D-covariantderivation . .136 5.5 Infeld - van der Waerden coefficients . 138 5.6 D-spinors of Anisotropic Curvature and Torsion . 140 6 Anisotropic Spinors and Field Equations 143 6.1 Anisotropic Scalar Field Interactions . 143 6.2 AnisotropicProcaequations. .145 6.3 AnisotropicGravitonsandBackgrounds . 146 6.4 Anisotropic Dirac Equations . 146 6.5 Yang-Mills Equations in Anisotropic Spinor Form . 147 III Higher Order Anisotropic Spinors 149 7 Clifford Ha–Structures 153 7.1 Distinguished Clifford Algebras . 153 7.2 CliffordHa–Bundles .......................158 7.2.1 Clifford d–module structure in dv–bundles . 158 7.2.2 Clifford fibration . 160 x CONTENTS 7.3 AlmostComplexSpinorStructures . 161 8 Spinors and Ha–Spaces 165 8.1 D–SpinorTechniques. .165 8.1.1 Clifford d–algebra, d–spinors and d–twistors . 166 8.1.2 Mutual transforms of d-tensors and d-spinors . 169 8.1.3 Transformation of d-tensors into d-spinors . 169 8.1.4 Fundamentald–spinors . .170 8.2 DifferentialGeometryofHa–Spinors . 171 8.2.1 D-covariant derivation on ha–spaces . 172 8.2.2 Infeld–van der Waerden coefficients . 174 8.2.3 D–spinors of ha–space curvature and torsion. 176 9 Ha-Spinors and Field Interactions 179 9.1 Scalarfieldha–interactions. .179 9.2 Procaequationsonha–spaces . .181 9.3 Higher order anisotropic Dirac equations . 182 9.4 D–spinor Yang–Mills fields . 183 9.5 D–spinorEinstein–CartanTheory . 184 9.5.1 Einstein ha–equations . 184 9.5.2 Einstein–Cartan d–equations . 185 9.5.3 Higher order anisotropic gravitons . 185 IV Finsler Geometry and Spinor Variables 187 10 Metrics Depending on Spinor Variables 189 10.1 LorentzTransformation. .189 10.2Curvature .............................193 11 Field Equations in Spinor Variables 199 11.1Introduction............................199 11.2 Derivationofthefieldequations . 201 11.3 Generalized Conformally Flat Spaces . 206 11.4 Geodesicsandgeodesicdeviation . 211 11.5Conclusions ............................213 12 Gauge Gravity Over Spinor Bundles 215 12.1Introduction............................215 12.2Connections ............................217 12.2.1 Nonlinear connections . 218 12.2.2 Lorentztransformation . 221 CONTENTS xi 12.3 Curvaturesandtorsions . .222 12.4Fieldequations ..........................223 12.5 Bianchi identities . 225 12.6 Yang-Mills fields . 227 12.7 Yang-Mills-Higgs field . 228 13 Spinors on Internal Deformed Systems 231 13.1Introduction............................231
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:0911.0334V2 [Gr-Qc] 4 Jul 2020
    Classical Physics: Spacetime and Fields Nikodem Poplawski Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of New Haven, CT, USA Preface We present a self-contained introduction to the classical theory of spacetime and fields. This expo- sition is based on the most general principles: the principle of general covariance (relativity) and the principle of least action. The order of the exposition is: 1. Spacetime (principle of general covariance and tensors, affine connection, curvature, metric, tetrad and spin connection, Lorentz group, spinors); 2. Fields (principle of least action, action for gravitational field, matter, symmetries and conservation laws, gravitational field equations, spinor fields, electromagnetic field, action for particles). In this order, a particle is a special case of a field existing in spacetime, and classical mechanics can be derived from field theory. I dedicate this book to my Parents: Bo_zennaPop lawska and Janusz Pop lawski. I am also grateful to Chris Cox for inspiring this book. The Laws of Physics are simple, beautiful, and universal. arXiv:0911.0334v2 [gr-qc] 4 Jul 2020 1 Contents 1 Spacetime 5 1.1 Principle of general covariance and tensors . 5 1.1.1 Vectors . 5 1.1.2 Tensors . 6 1.1.3 Densities . 7 1.1.4 Contraction . 7 1.1.5 Kronecker and Levi-Civita symbols . 8 1.1.6 Dual densities . 8 1.1.7 Covariant integrals . 9 1.1.8 Antisymmetric derivatives . 9 1.2 Affine connection . 10 1.2.1 Covariant differentiation of tensors . 10 1.2.2 Parallel transport . 11 1.2.3 Torsion tensor . 11 1.2.4 Covariant differentiation of densities .
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein and Friedmann Equations
    Outline ● Go over homework ● Einstein equations ● Friedmann equations Homework ● For next class: – A light ray is emitted from r = 0 at time t = 0. Find an expression for r(t) in a flat universe (k=0) and in a positively curved universe (k=1). Einstein Equations ● General relativity describes gravity in terms of curved spacetime. ● Mass/energy causes the curvature – Described by mass-energy tensor – Which, in general, is a function of position ● The metric describes the spacetime – Metric determines how particles will move ● To go from Newtonian gravity to General Relativity d2 GM 8 πG ⃗r = r^ → Gμ ν(gμ ν) = T μ ν dt2 r 2 c4 ● Where G is some function of the metric Curvature ● How to calculate curvature of spacetime from metric? – “readers unfamiliar with tensor calculus can skip down to Eq. 8.22” – There are no equations with tensors after 8.23 ● Curvature of spacetime is quantified using parallel transport ● Hold a vector and keep it parallel to your direction of motion as you move around on a curved surface. ● Locally, the vector stays parallel between points that are close together, but as you move finite distances the vector rotates – in a manner depending on the path. Curvature ● Mathematically, one uses “Christoffel symbols” to calculate the “affine connection” which is how to do parallel transport. ● Christoffel symbols involve derivatives of the metric. μ 1 μρ ∂ gσ ρ ∂ gνρ ∂ g Γ = g + + σ ν σ ν 2 ( ∂ x ν ∂ xσ ∂ xρ ) ● The Reimann tensor measures “the extent to which the metric tensor is not locally isometric to that of Euclidean space”.
    [Show full text]
  • SPINORS and SPACE–TIME ANISOTROPY
    Sergiu Vacaru and Panayiotis Stavrinos SPINORS and SPACE{TIME ANISOTROPY University of Athens ————————————————— c Sergiu Vacaru and Panyiotis Stavrinos ii - i ABOUT THE BOOK This is the first monograph on the geometry of anisotropic spinor spaces and its applications in modern physics. The main subjects are the theory of grav- ity and matter fields in spaces provided with off–diagonal metrics and asso- ciated anholonomic frames and nonlinear connection structures, the algebra and geometry of distinguished anisotropic Clifford and spinor spaces, their extension to spaces of higher order anisotropy and the geometry of gravity and gauge theories with anisotropic spinor variables. The book summarizes the authors’ results and can be also considered as a pedagogical survey on the mentioned subjects. ii - iii ABOUT THE AUTHORS Sergiu Ion Vacaru was born in 1958 in the Republic of Moldova. He was educated at the Universities of the former URSS (in Tomsk, Moscow, Dubna and Kiev) and reveived his PhD in theoretical physics in 1994 at ”Al. I. Cuza” University, Ia¸si, Romania. He was employed as principal senior researcher, as- sociate and full professor and obtained a number of NATO/UNESCO grants and fellowships at various academic institutions in R. Moldova, Romania, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal and USA. He has published in English two scientific monographs, a university text–book and more than hundred scientific works (in English, Russian and Romanian) on (super) gravity and string theories, extra–dimension and brane gravity, black hole physics and cosmolgy, exact solutions of Einstein equations, spinors and twistors, anistoropic stochastic and kinetic processes and thermodynamics in curved spaces, generalized Finsler (super) geometry and gauge gravity, quantum field and geometric methods in condensed matter physics.
    [Show full text]
  • General Relativity Fall 2019 Lecture 13: Geodesic Deviation; Einstein field Equations
    General Relativity Fall 2019 Lecture 13: Geodesic deviation; Einstein field equations Yacine Ali-Ha¨ımoud October 11th, 2019 GEODESIC DEVIATION The principle of equivalence states that one cannot distinguish a uniform gravitational field from being in an accelerated frame. However, tidal fields, i.e. gradients of gravitational fields, are indeed measurable. Here we will show that the Riemann tensor encodes tidal fields. Consider a fiducial free-falling observer, thus moving along a geodesic G. We set up Fermi normal coordinates in µ the vicinity of this geodesic, i.e. coordinates in which gµν = ηµν jG and ΓνσjG = 0. Events along the geodesic have coordinates (x0; xi) = (t; 0), where we denote by t the proper time of the fiducial observer. Now consider another free-falling observer, close enough from the fiducial observer that we can describe its position with the Fermi normal coordinates. We denote by τ the proper time of that second observer. In the Fermi normal coordinates, the spatial components of the geodesic equation for the second observer can be written as d2xi d dxi d2xi dxi d2t dxi dxµ dxν = (dt/dτ)−1 (dt/dτ)−1 = (dt/dτ)−2 − (dt/dτ)−3 = − Γi − Γ0 : (1) dt2 dτ dτ dτ 2 dτ dτ 2 µν µν dt dt dt The Christoffel symbols have to be evaluated along the geodesic of the second observer. If the second observer is close µ µ λ λ µ enough to the fiducial geodesic, we may Taylor-expand Γνσ around G, where they vanish: Γνσ(x ) ≈ x @λΓνσjG + 2 µ 0 µ O(x ).
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Gravitational Wave Science: 100 Years of Development of Mathematical Theory, Detectors, Numerical Algorithms, and Data Analysis Tools
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 53, Number 4, October 2016, Pages 513–554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/bull/1544 Article electronically published on August 2, 2016 THE EMERGENCE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE SCIENCE: 100 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL THEORY, DETECTORS, NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, AND DATA ANALYSIS TOOLS MICHAEL HOLST, OLIVIER SARBACH, MANUEL TIGLIO, AND MICHELE VALLISNERI In memory of Sergio Dain Abstract. On September 14, 2015, the newly upgraded Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) recorded a loud gravitational-wave (GW) signal, emitted a billion light-years away by a coalescing binary of two stellar-mass black holes. The detection was announced in February 2016, in time for the hundredth anniversary of Einstein’s prediction of GWs within the theory of general relativity (GR). The signal represents the first direct detec- tion of GWs, the first observation of a black-hole binary, and the first test of GR in its strong-field, high-velocity, nonlinear regime. In the remainder of its first observing run, LIGO observed two more signals from black-hole bina- ries, one moderately loud, another at the boundary of statistical significance. The detections mark the end of a decades-long quest and the beginning of GW astronomy: finally, we are able to probe the unseen, electromagnetically dark Universe by listening to it. In this article, we present a short historical overview of GW science: this young discipline combines GR, arguably the crowning achievement of classical physics, with record-setting, ultra-low-noise laser interferometry, and with some of the most powerful developments in the theory of differential geometry, partial differential equations, high-performance computation, numerical analysis, signal processing, statistical inference, and data science.
    [Show full text]
  • Tensor-Spinor Theory of Gravitation in General Even Space-Time Dimensions
    Physics Letters B 817 (2021) 136288 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Tensor-spinor theory of gravitation in general even space-time dimensions ∗ Hitoshi Nishino a, ,1, Subhash Rajpoot b a Department of Physics, College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, California State University, 2345 E. San Ramon Avenue, M/S ST90, Fresno, CA 93740, United States of America b Department of Physics & Astronomy, California State University, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, United States of America a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We present a purely tensor-spinor theory of gravity in arbitrary even D = 2n space-time dimensions. Received 18 March 2021 This is a generalization of the purely vector-spinor theory of gravitation by Bars and MacDowell (BM) in Accepted 9 April 2021 4D to general even dimensions with the signature (2n − 1, 1). In the original BM-theory in D = (3, 1), Available online 21 April 2021 the conventional Einstein equation emerges from a theory based on the vector-spinor field ψμ from a Editor: N. Lambert m lagrangian free of both the fundamental metric gμν and the vierbein eμ . We first improve the original Keywords: BM-formulation by introducing a compensator χ, so that the resulting theory has manifest invariance = =− = Bars-MacDowell theory under the nilpotent local fermionic symmetry: δψ Dμ and δ χ . We next generalize it to D Vector-spinor (2n − 1, 1), following the same principle based on a lagrangian free of fundamental metric or vielbein Tensors-spinors rs − now with the field content (ψμ1···μn−1 , ωμ , χμ1···μn−2 ), where ψμ1···μn−1 (or χμ1···μn−2 ) is a (n 1) (or Metric-less formulation (n − 2)) rank tensor-spinor.
    [Show full text]
  • Static Solutions of Einstein's Equations with Spherical Symmetry
    Static Solutions of Einstein’s Equations with Spherical Symmetry IftikharAhmad,∗ Maqsoom Fatima and Najam-ul-Basat. Institute of Physics and Mathematical Sciences, Department of Mathematics, University of Gujrat Pakistan. Abstract The Schwarzschild solution is a complete solution of Einstein’s field equations for a static spherically symmetric field. The Einstein’s field equations solutions appear in the literature, but in different ways corresponding to different definitions of the radial coordinate. We attempt to compare them to the solutions with nonvanishing energy density and pressure. We also calculate some special cases with changes in spherical symmetry. Keywords: Schwarzschild solution, Spherical symmetry, Einstein’s equations, Static uni- verse. 1 Introduction Even though the Einstein field equations are highly nonlinear partial differential equations, there are numerous exact solutions to them. In addition to the exact solution, there are also non-exact solutions to these equations which describe certain physical systems. Exact solutions and their physical interpretations are sometimes even harder. Probably the simplest of all exact solutions to the Einstein field equations is that of Schwarzschild. Furthermore, the static solutions of Einstein’s equations with spherical symmetry (the exterior and interior Schwarzschild solutions) are already much popular in general relativity, solutions with spherical symmetry in vacuum are much less recognizable. Together with conventional isometries, which have been more widely studied, they help to provide a deeper insight into the spacetime geometry. They assist in the arXiv:1308.1233v2 [gr-qc] 2 May 2014 generation of exact solutions, sometimes new solutions of the Einstein field equations which may be utilized to model relativistic, astrophysical and cosmological phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalizations of the Kerr-Newman Solution
    Generalizations of the Kerr-Newman solution Contents 1 Topics 1035 1.1 ICRANetParticipants. 1035 1.2 Ongoingcollaborations. 1035 1.3 Students ............................... 1035 2 Brief description 1037 3 Introduction 1039 4 Thegeneralstaticvacuumsolution 1041 4.1 Line element and field equations . 1041 4.2 Staticsolution ............................ 1043 5 Stationary generalization 1045 5.1 Ernst representation . 1045 5.2 Representation as a nonlinear sigma model . 1046 5.3 Representation as a generalized harmonic map . 1048 5.4 Dimensional extension . 1052 5.5 Thegeneralsolution . 1055 6 Tidal indicators in the spacetime of a rotating deformed mass 1059 6.1 Introduction ............................. 1059 6.2 The gravitational field of a rotating deformed mass . 1060 6.2.1 Limitingcases. 1062 6.3 Circularorbitsonthesymmetryplane . 1064 6.4 Tidalindicators ........................... 1065 6.4.1 Super-energy density and super-Poynting vector . 1067 6.4.2 Discussion.......................... 1068 6.4.3 Limit of slow rotation and small deformation . 1069 6.5 Multipole moments, tidal Love numbers and Post-Newtonian theory................................. 1076 6.6 Concludingremarks . 1077 7 Neutrino oscillations in the field of a rotating deformed mass 1081 7.1 Introduction ............................. 1081 7.2 Stationary axisymmetric spacetimes and neutrino oscillation . 1082 7.2.1 Geodesics .......................... 1083 1033 Contents 7.2.2 Neutrinooscillations . 1084 7.3 Neutrino oscillations in the Hartle-Thorne metric . 1085 7.4 Concludingremarks . 1088 8 Gravitational field of compact objects in general relativity 1091 8.1 Introduction ............................. 1091 8.2 The Hartle-Thorne metrics . 1094 8.2.1 The interior solution . 1094 8.2.2 The Exterior Solution . 1096 8.3 The Fock’s approach . 1097 8.3.1 The interior solution .
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's 1916 Derivation of the Field Equations
    1 Einstein's 1916 derivation of the Field Equations Galina Weinstein 24/10/2013 Abstract: In his first November 4, 1915 paper Einstein wrote the Lagrangian form of his field equations. In the fourth November 25, 1915 paper, Einstein added a trace term of the energy- momentum tensor on the right-hand side of the generally covariant field equations. The main purpose of the present work is to show that in November 4, 1915, Einstein had already explored much of the main ingredients that were required for the formulation of the final form of the field equations of November 25, 1915. The present work suggests that the idea of adding the second-term on the right-hand side of the field equation might have originated in reconsideration of the November 4, 1915 field equations. In this regard, the final form of Einstein's field equations with the trace term may be linked with his work of November 4, 1915. The interesting history of the derivation of the final form of the field equations is inspired by the exchange of letters between Einstein and Paul Ehrenfest in winter 1916 and by Einstein's 1916 derivation of the November 25, 1915 field equations. In 1915, Einstein wrote the vacuum (matter-free) field equations in the form:1 for all systems of coordinates for which It is sufficient to note that the left-hand side represents the gravitational field, with g the metric tensor field. Einstein wrote the field equations in Lagrangian form. The action,2 and the Lagrangian, 2 Using the components of the gravitational field: Einstein wrote the variation: which gives:3 We now come back to (2), and we have, Inserting (6) into (7) gives the field equations (1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Einstein Tensor Characterizing Some Riemann Spaces
    ••fc IC/93/204 Internal Report (Limited Distribution) International Atomic Energy Agency and United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS THE EINSTEIN TENSOR CHARACTERIZING SOME RIEMANN SPACES M. S. Rahman1 International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy. ABSTRACT A formal definition of the Einstein tensor is given. Mention is made of how this tensor plays a role of expressing certain conditions in a precise form. The cases of reducing the Einstein tensor to a zero tensor are studied on its merit. A lucid account of results, formulated as theorems, on Einstein symmetric and Einstein recurrent spaces is then presented. MIRAMARE - TRIESTE July 1993 Permanent address: Department of Mathematics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka-134;2, Bangladesh. 1 Introduction and Definition The Einstein tensor [5] is defined by This tensor is in covariant form E R (1) We note that Exjj — 0 which means that the divergence of the Einstein tensor vanishes. This equation which is very remarkably an identity in Riemannian geometry is impor- tant in the theory of Relativity. Einstein's tensor has proved of tremendous importance for subsequent researches both in Riemannian geometry and in Relativity. Hitherto, the tensor had been of interest to mathematicians and physicists, and simply for its own sake. Contracting (1) with gl> gives E = R-^R where we may call E the Einstein scalar curvature. It readily follows from (2) that in a V4 the algebraic sum of the Einstein scalar curva- ture and scalar curvature is zero, that is, E + R = 0. This paper illuminates the virtue of the Einstein tensor in a consistent manner and deals with its characterizing some Riemann spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Canonical and Gravitational Stress-Energy Tensors
    Canonical and gravitational stress-energy tensors M. Leclerc Section of Astrophysics and Astronomy, Department of Physics, University of Athens, Greece April 11, 2006 Abstract It is dealt with the question, under which circumstances the canonical Noether stress-energy tensor is equivalent to the gravitational (Hilbert) tensor for general matter fields under the influence of gravity. In the framework of general relativity, the full equivalence is established for matter fields that do not couple to the metric derivatives. Spinor fields are included into our analysis by reformulating general relativity in terms of tetrad fields, and the case of Poincar´egauge theory, with an additional, independent Lorentz connection, is also investigated. Special attention is given to the flat limit, focusing on the expressions for the matter field energy (Hamiltonian). The Dirac- Maxwell system is investigated in detail, with special care given to the separation of free (kinetic) and interaction (or potential) energy. Moreover, the stress-energy tensor of the gravitational field itself is briefly discussed. PACS: 04.50.+h, 04.20.Fy 1 Introduction In textbooks on general relativity, the Hilbert stress-energy tensor is often presented as an improvement over the canonical Noether tensor, because it is automatically symmetric, while the Noether tensor has to be submitted to a relocalization if one insists on a symmetric tensor. That we have, on one hand, a symmetric tensor, and on the other hand, a tensor that is physically equivalent to a symmetric arXiv:gr-qc/0510044v6 25 Aug 2006 tensor, is thus well known. This, however, does still not proof that both tensors are indeed equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Festschrift for Thomas Erber
    Physics:Doing A Festschrift For Thomas Erber Edited by Porter Wear Johnson GC(2251)_PhysicsBookCvr10.indd 1 9/15/10 10:33 AM Doing Physics: A Festschrift for Tom Erber Edited by Porter Wear Johnson Illinois Institute of Technology IIT Press Doing Physics: A Festschrift For Thomas Erber edited by Porter Wear Johnson Published by: IIT Press 3300 S. Federal St., 301MB Chicago, IL 60616 Copyright °c 2010 IIT Press All rights reserved. No part of this book, including interior design, cover design, and icons, may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photo- copying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 1-61597-000-2 Series Editor: Technical Editor: Sudhakar Nair Julia Chase Editorial Board David Arditi Roya Ayman Krishna Erramilli Porter Wear Johnson Harry Francis Mallgrave Mickie Piatt Katherine Riley Keiicho Sato Vincent Turitto Geo®rey Williamson Doing Physics: A Festschrift for Tom Erber Preface \Au¼ertenÄ wir oben, da¼ die Geschichte des Menschen den Menschen darstelle, so lÄa¼tsich hier auch wohl behaupten, da¼ die Geschichte der Wissenschaft die Wissenschaft selbst sei." Goethe, Zur Farbenlehre: Vorwort (1808) It is widely asserted that the great physicists who grasped the full unity of physics are all dead, having been replaced in this age of specialization by sci- entists who have a deep understanding only for issues of rather limited scope. Indeed, it is di±cult to refute such a viewpoint today, at the end of the ¯rst decade of the twenty-¯rst century. The unifying principles of the quantum the- ory and relativity are part of the ethos of physics, but fragmented development in various disjointed areas has characterized the past several decades of progress.
    [Show full text]