5.0 About This Section

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5.0 About This Section 5.0 About This Section The following subsections of this chapter address significant environmental effects that cannot be avoided, signi- ficant irreversible environmental effects, effects on humans, growth-inducing impacts and cumulative impacts that would result if the proposed project, General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 960, were implemented as part of build out of the Riverside County General Plan over time. In Section 5.6 the consistency of the General Plan, as it would be updated pursuant to GPA No. 960, is compared with various regional plans. Different parts of GPA No. 960 affect various areas across and throughout Riverside County and some, such as the new greenhouse gas policies proposed for the General Plan Air Quality Element, span the entire county. As such, the scope of Section 5.0 generally encompasses all of unincorporated Riverside County. As would be expected, Sections 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 discuss the specific effects of the proposed changes included in GPA No. 960 in terms of unavoidable significant effects (Section 5.1), significant irreversible changes (Section 5.2), sub- stantial human effects (Section 5.3) and growth-inducing effects (Section 5.4). For Section 5.5 (Cumulative Impacts) and Section 5.6 (Regional Consistency), however, the scope of analysis is broadened to address full build out of the Riverside County General Plan in its entirety. For example, this means that the effects of build out of the updated General Plan, reflecting the changes that would occur to the document if GPA No. 960 is approved, are compared to the effects projected for various other build out scenarios (existing General Plan without the project, cumulative projects, etc.). This distinction is necessary because the widespread nature of the various components of GPA No. 960 makes appropriate an examination of the end point at which all of these com- ponents would be realized. It should also be noted that, with respect to CEQA, pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21081, where a significant impact has been identified in the EIR, the County of Riverside shall not approve or carry out the project unless the County of Riverside makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant effect: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. 2. Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly-trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. County of Riverside Environmental Impact Report No. 521 Public Review Draft . March 2014 5-1 In addition, pursuant to CEQA (PRC Section 21081.5), these findings must be based on substantial evidence in the record. The two tables below summarize all of the significant effects associated with GPA No. 960. Table 5.0-A (Unavoidable Significant Environmental Effects) outlines the effects found to be “significant” with respect to the criteria of CEQA, PRC Section 21083(b) and also significant effects found to be “unavoidable” per CCR Section 15126(b). These findings are discussed in full in Sections 5.1, 5.3 and 5.5. In addition, see the associated parts of Section 4.0 for the environmental bases and analyses performed for the various impacts listed. Table 5.0- B (Summary of Significant Irreversible Changes and Growth-Inducing Effects) outlines the significant irreversible changes and growth-inducing effects associated with GPA No. 960. These findings are discussed in Sections 5.2 and 5.4. Table 5.0-A: Unavoidable Significant Environmental Effects Effects term - 1 Impact Impact Title / Description Degrade Environment Environment Curtail Short Human Effects Cumulative 4.3 – Population and Housing 4.3.A Induce direct or indirect population growth. • 4.4 – Aesthetic and Visual Resources 4.4.A Adversely affect scenic vistas. • 4.4.B Adversely affect scenic resources within State Scenic Highways. • 4.4.D Cause adverse light and glare effects. • 4.5 – Agricultural and Forestry Resources 4.5.A Cause the conversion of designated Farmlands. • • 4.5.B Encroach on or conflict with existing agricultural uses. • • 4.6 – Air Quality 4.6.A Conflict with air quality plans. • 4.6.B (1) Cause significant construction (short-term) air emissions. • • • 4.6.B (2) Cause significant operational (long-term) air emissions. • • • 4.6.C Cause cumulatively significant project air quality impacts. • • • 4.6.D Expose sensitive receptors to air pollutants. • • • 4.9 – Cultural and Paleontological Resources 4.9.B Cause the destruction of known archeological resources. • 4.9.C Cause the destruction of unique paleontological resources or sites. • 4.10 – Energy Resources 4.10.A Increase demand for electricity. • 4.10.B Increase demand for natural gas. • 4.12 – Geology and Soils 4.12.B Expose people or structures to strong seismic groundshaking. • • 4.12.D Expose people or structures to landslides. • • 4.13 – Hazardous Materials and Safety 4.13.H Expose people or structures to wildland fires. • • 4.15 – Noise 4.15.A Generate noise or cause noise exposure in excess of standards. • • • • 4.15.C Cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels. • • • • 4.15.D Cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels • • • County of Riverside Environmental Impact Report No. 521 5-2 Public Review Draft . March 2014 Effects term - 1 Impact Impact Title / Description Degrade Environment Environment Curtail Short Human Effects Cumulative 4.16 – Parks and Recreation 4.16.A Adversely affect existing recreational resources. • 4.17 – Public Facilities 4.17.A Cause adverse environmental effects due to the need for fire protection services. • 4.17.B Cause adverse environmental effects due to the need for law enforcement services. • 4.17.C (1) Adversely affect or exceed the permitted capacity of a landfill. • 4.17.D Cause adverse environmental effects due to the need for schools. • 4.17.E Cause adverse environmental effects due to the need for library services. • 4.17.F Cause adverse environmental effects due to the need for medical facilities. • 4.18 – Transportation and Traffic 4.18.A Conflict with circulation system effectiveness regulations for any transportation. • • • • 4.18.B Conflict with congestion management program, including LOS standards. • 4.19 – Water Resources 4.19.A Result in insufficient water supply. • • • • 4.19.B Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. • • • • 4.19.H Substantially alter existing drainage patterns resulting in substantial erosion or siltation. • Cause runoff exceeding stormwater drainage system capacities or cause substantial water 4.19.I pollution. • Cause significant adverse effects due to the need for new or expanded stormwater drainage 4.19.J facilities. • 5.4 – Significant Irreversible Changes3 5.2.B Result in the unjustified commitment of irretrievable resources. • 5.2.C Result in primary or secondary impacts that generally commit future generations to similar uses. • 5.4 – Significant Growth-Inducing Effects3 5.4.A Foster direct or indirect economic growth. • 5.4.B Foster direct or indirect population growth. • 5.4.C Result in construction of additional housing. • 5.4.D Remove obstacles to population growth. • Facilitate other activities leading to significant environmental effects; e.g., encroach into isolated 5.4.E or remote areas. • 5.4.F Result in population increase that may strain community services or facilities. • Footnotes: 1. A “significant effect on the environment” pursuant to CEQA (PRC section 21083(b)) would do any of the following: Substantially degrade the quality of the environment. (See discussion in Section 5.1.) Substantially curtail the range of environment. (See discussion in Section 5.1.) Achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. (See Section 5.1.) Cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. (See discussion in Section 5.3.) Cause effects that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. (See discussion in Section 5.5.) 2. “Unavoidable” defined per CCR Section 15126(b) as significant “environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the proposed project is implemented.” (See discussion in Section 5.1.) 3. Discussed in the section indicated, rather than in Section 5.5 (Cumulative Impacts). Source: Riverside County Planning Dept., Results of analyses in Sections 4.2 - 4.19 and 5.1 - 5.5 of this EIR, 2012. County of Riverside Environmental Impact Report No. 521 Public Review Draft . March 2014 5-3 Table 5.0-B: Summary of Significant Irreversible Changes and Growth-Inducing Effects 2 1 Inducing - rowth Irreversible G Section - Effect Category / Type of Significant Impact 5.2 – Significant Irreversible Changes 5.2.A Result in a large commitment of non-renewable resources that make later removal or non-use unlikely. •3 5.2.B Result in the unjustified commitment of irretrievable resources. 5.2.C Result in primary or secondary impacts that generally commit future generations to similar uses. • 5.2.D Result in an environmental accident that could cause irreversible damage. 5.4 – Significant Growth Inducing Effects 5.4.A Foster direct or indirect economic growth. • 5.4.B Foster direct or indirect population growth. • 5.4.C Result in construction of additional housing. • 5.4.D Remove obstacles to population growth. • 5.4.E Facilitate other activities leading to significant environmental effects; e.g., encroach into isolated or remote areas. • • 5.4.F Result in population increase that may strain community services or facilities. Footnotes: 1. Significant “irreversible environmental changes should the project be implemented” (CCR Section 15126.2(c)), as discussed in Section 5.2.
Recommended publications
  • FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) 37600 Sky Canyon Dr
    FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) 37600 Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA Phone: 951-600-7297 Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951) 276-6701 Visit the F70 website for additional information regarding the airport and procedures at www.rcfva.org Federal Aviation Administration FAA Headquarters 800 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20591 www.faa.gov/contact Feedback is always appreciated at [email protected] INTRODUCTION In response to community interest, this booklet was developed to provide an overview of Airport operations and the complaint process. It will explain how and what aircraft operate in vicinity of F70, their interaction with our neighbors, and how complaints are handled. (F70 is the identifier selected by Federal Aviation Administration for the French Valley Airport. All airports have a three- character identifier; local examples are ONT for Ontario International Airport and LAX for Los Angeles Airport.) AIRPORT HISTORY In the late 1970s, discussion and planning began on relocating the existing Rancho California Airport due, in part, to safety deficiencies. In addition, the airport was leased to the County with the owner not wanting to renew the lease. An evaluation leading to the identification and selection of potential new sites was undertaken in June 1983. In June 1985 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution designating the French Valley site as the replacement site for the existing Rancho California Airport. The Federal Aviation Administration approved the French Valley Airport Layout plan in 1985 and funded four grants for land acquisition. Initial construction of French Valley Airport began in October 1987 and was completed in April 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurupa Area Plan This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    Jurupa Area Plan This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................4 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ................................................................................................5 LOCATION...........................................................................................................................................................6 FEATURES ..........................................................................................................................................................6 SETTING ............................................................................................................................................................6 UNIQUE FEATURES .............................................................................................................................................7 Santa Ana River ..........................................................................................................................................7 Jurupa Mountains/Pyrite Canyon ................................................................................................................7 Pedley Hills ..................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Murrieta, California Draft Final
    DRAFT FINAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN for FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Riverside County, California Draft Final Technical Report Prepared by Coffman Associates, Inc. April 2009 “The preparation of this document may have been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration as provided under Title 49, United States Code, Section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws.” FRENCH VALLEY TABLE OF CONTENTS A•I•R•P•O•R•T FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Murrieta, California Draft Final Airport Master Plan INTRODUCTION MASTER PLAN OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... ii MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS AND PROCESS ................................................. ii COORDINATION .............................................................................................. iv Chapter One INVENTORY REGIONAL SETTING..................................................................................... 1-1 Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 1-2 Climate .................................................................................................. 1-2 Utilities .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redlands Airport Association Newsletter
    Redlands Airport Association City of redlands Newsletter 12-31-20 Volume 7, Issue 4 Chapter of California Pilots Association The Mission of the RAA • To advocate for all users Observations & Comments of REI. • To promote, support, and encourage the By RAA President Ted Gablin continued use of REI. • To communicate the airport’s importance to I, like most of us, am looking forward to putting 2020 in the rear-view mirror. I am the community. thankful no one in my family has had Covid except maybe me. Unfortunately, my dad has been locked up in a senior facility in Florida, like many other seniors, with limited • To educate airport users of relevant regulatory social contact and with restrictions on family visits. We know this was done for his and legislative protection, but at 94, it’s been difficult for him and the rest of the family. airport/aviation matters. There are a few folks in our little REI village that have gotten ill from the virus and • To provide a forum whereby those others have suffered job related economic impacts from the pandemic. Others have concerned about REI been fortunate enough to continue flying activities. issues can voice their concerns. The RAA and EAA had to cancel all planned events this year. There were no Young Eagles flights, no pancake breakfasts, spot landing or flour bombing contests. The EAA • To advise the appropriate authorities cancelled their holiday party. The RAA started to plan a holiday party, but it too fell regarding safety, victim to the pandemic. It’s too bad as these events get kids interested in aviation, get security, and other the community to the airport, and gets our airport community together for good times.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life
    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
    [Show full text]
  • Thrifty Oil Bloomington Warehouse Initial Study
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This form and the descriptive information in the application package constitute the contents of Initial Study pursuant to County Guidelines under Ordinance 3040 and Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines. PROJECT LABEL: APN: 0260-131-14, 0260-0131-15 APPLICANT: Howard Industrial Partners, LLC USGS Quad: San Bernardino South COMMUNITY: Agua Mansa/Rialto/5th Supervisorial District T, R, Section: T2S R4W 2 LOCATION: 12685 Holly Street STAFF: Aron Liang SB Countywide Plan: Heavy Industrial (H-IND) and Open Space Agricultural (OS-AG) REP('S): Mike Tunney, Howard Industrial Partners, Planning Area: Agua Mansa Industrial Corridor Specific Plan LLC PROPOSAL: Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a parking lot to accommodate 1,561 parking spaces for automobiles, long haul tractors, and trailers, on approximately 64.8 acres. PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION: Lead Agency: San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 Contact Person: Aron Liang, Senior Planner Phone No: (909) 387-0235 Fax No: (909) 387-7911 E-mail: [email protected] Project Sponsor: Howard Industrial Partners, LLC 1944 N. Tustin Street, Suite 122 Orange, CA 92865 Consultant: Environment | Planning | Development Solutions, Inc. 2030 Main Street, Suite 1200 Irvine, CA 92614 APN: 026-013-114, 026-013-115 INITIAL STUDY Page 2 of 78 Holly Street Parking Lot Project P201700305 February 20, 2019 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is the redevelopment of the approximately 65 acre project site, which is currently a motorcycle track (Milestone MX motorcycle park) and other ancillary improvements into a parking lot to be used for truck tractor, tractor trailer storage and overflow employee parking associated with the existing FedEx facilities located at 330 Resource Drive, Rialto or 11600 Cactus Ave., Bloomington, both approximately 2.1 miles north of the project site.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Flight Training Information Catalog
    ADVANCED FLIGHT TRAINING INFORMATION CATALOG Airport: French Valley Airport Address: 37600 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite G Murrieta, CA 92563 Telephone: Day and Night: (951) 304-9639 Emergency: (562) 387-8505 Email: [email protected] Website: www.flyefi.coM Services: Flight Training, Aircraft Rental, PSI Testing Facility Approved by the Federal Aviation AdMinistration under FAR Part 141 Issued: June 3, 2020 All materials contained in this bulletin are true and correct and policy. Signature of School Official: Stephanie Bowden 1 INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES AIRPORT French Valley Airport 37600 Sky Canyon Drive Murrieta, CA 92563 French Valley Airport (F70) is the main operations base for flight training. The airport has one hard surface runway and meets the requirements of section 141.38 for day and night flight operations. Fuel services are available from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm daily. TRAINING FACILITIES The school consists of a 2,275 sq. ft. office space located in the French Valley Airport Terminal Building. This training facility is divided into 4 administrative offices, a reception lobby, a 1650 sq. ft. modular training area with a capacity for 20 students and teaching equipment to meet educational needs. Restrooms are located in the main terminal building. Computer testing is done in a dedicated room with (3) testing stations. The testing area is visible through a glass paneled door and is proctored from the front desk. CLASSROOM LAYOUT 2 FLIGHT SCHOOL CALENDAR Enrollment in flight training courses will be permitted on days as stated in paragraph 2 in this section, unless the school elects to close its enrollment for the following reasons: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Perris General Plan Circulation Element
    City of Perris General Plan Circulation Element (City Council Adoption – June 14, 2005) (City Council Amendment (GPA 08-07-0010) – August 26, 2008) Circulation Element i City of Perris General Plan Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Authority and Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 1 Regional and Local Setting ........................................................................................................................ 1 Relationship to Other Technical and Planning Documents ............................................................ 2 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................ 10 Street and Highway System .................................................................................................................... 10 Public/Mass Transportation System .................................................................................................... 23 Non-Motorized Transportation ............................................................................................................ 25 Aviation ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 Goods Movement .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Number 4376 a Resolution of the City
    RESOLUTION NUMBER 4376 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING A HIGH SPEED RAIL ALIGNMENT ALONG THE 1-215 WITH STATIONS NEAR MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE AND THE DOWNTOWN SAN BERNARDINO TRANSIT CENTER WHEREAS, the California state government is proposing to build a high-speed rail line stretching from San Diego to Sacramento; and WHEREAS, California’s high-speed train initiative has attracted interest from around the world – and won our state a larger share of federal funding than any similar project in the country -- $2.25 billion; and WHEREAS, the southern section of the high speed rail project will link San Diego to Los Angeles, via the Inland Empire; and WHEREAS, the California High Speed Rail Authority is charged with determining the rail alignment and location of rail stations, and are currently deciding whether to follow an I-15 alignment through Corona or an I-215 alignment through Riverside and San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the measure of success for the high speed rail project will be ridership and the ability of the project to be self-supporting; and WHEREAS, the Inland Empire, comprised of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, has a population of over four million people as of 2008, and is the second largest area in Southern California. Since the 2000 Census, the area has experienced a 25.4% growth in population; and WHEREAS, of the staggering growth in the Inland Empire, the overwhelming majority is along the I-215 corridor in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The existing population along the I-215 corridor and Coachella Valley is near 2.2 million potential riders; and WHEREAS, residents in Riverside and San Bernardino County cities along the I-215 corridor and in Coachella Valley simply cannot get to an I-15 station easily.
    [Show full text]
  • March/April – 2008 1 PERPETUAL CALENDAR 2008 8 Wisconsin Chapter’S Annual Pancake Breakfast and Fly-In, KRYV Watertown APRIL Airport
    99 News – March/April – 2008 1 PERPETUAL CALENDAR 2008 8 Wisconsin Chapter’s Annual Pancake Breakfast and Fly-In, KRYV Watertown APRIL Airport. Contact Krys Brown at 99 News [email protected]. 4-6 Southeast Section Spring Meeting, Bay 20-22 Forest of Friendship, Atchison, KS, Secu- Watch Resort and Conference Center, rity and Solace through Flight – military Myrtle Beach, SC. Hosted by Carolinas To list your 99s events aviation and humanitarian flight organiza- Chapter. Contact Reva Carpenter at tions. Visit www.ifof.org. on this calendar page, [email protected] or elizlee@comporium. send information to: net. 24-27 Air Race Classic, begins in Bozeman, MT The 99 News and ends in Mansfield, MA. Contact Linda 4300 Amelia Earhart Dr 8-14 Sun ‘n Fun, Lakeland, FL. Stop in at The Marshall, phone 406-388-7668 or visit Suite A 99s building for refreshments and friend- www. airraceclassic.org. Oklahoma City, OK ship. Visit www.sun-n-fun.org. 73159-1140 12 25th Anniversary Celebration of the Three 30 Deadline for submitting Professional Pilot Email: Rivers Chapter (North Central Section), Leadership Initiative (PPLI) application. [email protected] Fort Wayne, IN. Open House at the Ivy Email [email protected] or visit Tech Aviation Technology Building located www.ninety-nines.org/careers/ Online Form: mentoring.html. www.ninety-nines.org/ on Smith Field (SMD). Contact Linda Murphy, 260-632-5620 or 260-413-8134 99newsreports.html JULY (cell) or [email protected]. Please indicate the 28-Aug 3 EAA/AIRVENTURE, Oshkosh, WI. Visit 25-27 North Central Section Spring Meeting, name and location The Ninety-Nines tent, and on July 31 en- Osceola, IA.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 5. Environmental Analysis 5.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS This section evaluates the potential impacts of the proposed Project on human health and the environment due to exposure to hazardous materials or hazardous conditions associated with the Project site, Project construction, and Project operations. Potential Project impacts and appropriate mitigation measures or standard conditions are included as necessary. The analysis in this section is based, in part, upon the following source(s): . County of San Bernardino Safety Background Report, PlaceWorks and Dudek, April 5, 2017. A complete copy of this study is included in the Technical Appendices to this Draft PEIR (Appendix G). 5.8.1 Hazardous Materials 5.8.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Regulatory Background Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 (42 USC. § 6901 et seq.) is the principal federal law that regulates the generation, management, and transportation of waste. Hazardous waste management includes the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste. The RCRA gave the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to control hazardous waste from “cradle to grave,” that is, from generation to transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal, at active and future facilities. It does not address abandoned or historical sites. The RCRA also set forth a framework for managing nonhazardous wastes. Later amendments required phasing out land disposal of hazardous waste and added underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 (42 USC § 9601 et seq.), commonly known as the Superfund, protects water, air, and land resources from the risks created by past chemical disposal practices such as abandoned and historical hazardous waste sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Flabob Airport and Environs
    W3 Background Data: Flabob Airport and Environs INTRODUCTION Situated along the edge of the Santa Ana River just west of downtown Riverside, Flabob Airport’s long history goes back to the early days of aviation. The present airport has existed since at least 1925— some accounts say a dirt landing strip was located on the site as early as 1907. Flavio Madariaga and Bob Bogen became the airport’s owners in 1943 and gave their names to the facility. The now- nationwide Experimental Aviation Association was founded there in 1953. After languishing for many years and almost closing in the late 1990s, the airport was acquired by the Thomas W. Walthen Founda- tion in 2000. The new owners have removed some of the old buildings, constructed several new han- gars, and repaved much of the airfield. Today, the airport is home to some 200 aircraft, many of them vintage or experimental airplanes. Pro- viding educational programs for local school children is another role played by the airport. Facility im- provement plans call for construction of additional hangars with space for perhaps another 80 aircraft. A corresponding increase in aircraft operations can be anticipated. However, the limited land area pre- vents expansion of the single 3,190-foot runway (a shorter turf runway was closed in the early 1980s). Parts of the surrounding unincorporated community of Rubidoux have existed even longer than the airport, but much of the area remained agricultural until the 1990s. The residential neighborhood to the north and a mobile home park to the east have been there for many years; the subdivision along the river’s edge just south of the airport is a recent development.
    [Show full text]