Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan

Appendix A – Summary Data Analysis Report (Based on results obtained in 2013 through traffic and transport surveys)

October 2016

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Issue and revision record

Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description Working Draft - January 2016 Various AB/MF AJ

- October 2016 Various MF MF Final Draft

This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above- document being relied upon by any other party, or being captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any used for any other purpose, or containing any error or other party or used for any other purpose. omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.

This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Contents

1 Introduction 1

2 Road side Interviews 2

2.1 Methodology 2 2.2 Results 3 2.3 Key themes and issues 10 3 Roadside Interview Surveys (Pedestrians and Cyclists) 11

3.1 Methodology 11 3.2 Results 11 3.3 Key themes and issues 15 4 Household Survey Interviews (HSIs) 17

4.1 Methodology 17 4.2 Results 17 4.3 Key themes and issues 24 5 Public Transport 26

5.1 Methodology 26 5.2 Results 26 5.3 Key themes and issues 29 6 Parking Surveys 30

6.1 Methodology 30 6.2 Results 31 6.3 Key themes and issues 38 7 Vehicle Journey Times 39

7.1 Methodology 39 7.2 Results 39 7.3 Key themes and issues 43 8 Pedestrian Counts 44

8.1 Methodology 44 8.2 Results 44 8.3 Key themes and issues 45 9 Cruise Ships 46

9.1 Methodology 46 9.2 Results 46 9.3 Key themes and issues 50 10 School Travel 51

10.1 Methodology – Primary Schools 51 10.2 Results 51 10.3 Key themes and issues 52 10.4 Methodology - Secondary Schools 53 10.5 Results 53 10.6 Key themes and issues 56 10.7 Methodology - School Staff 56

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

10.8 Results 56 10.9 Key themes and issues 60 11 Workplace Travel Survey 61

11.1 Methodology 61 11.2 Results 61 11.3 Key themes and issues 65 12 General Online Travel Survey 66

12.1 Methodology 66 12.2 Results 66 13 Summary 83

List of Figures and Tables

Figure 1.0: Analysis Zones 1 Figure 2.0: Roadside Interview Locations 2 Figure 2.1: Vehicle type by zone 3 Figure 2.2: Zones by vehicle type 4 Figure 2.3: Vehicle occupancy by zone 4 Figure 2.4: Zone by vehicle occupancy 5 Figure 2.5: Parking type by zone 5 Figure 2.6: Zone by parking type 6 Figure 2.7: Purpose at origin 7 Figure 2.8: Purpose at origin by time 7 Figure 2.9: Destination purpose by origin 8 Figure 2.10: Destination purpose by destination 9 Figure 2.11: Purpose at destination by time 10 Figure 3.1: Mode of travel to the border by country of trip origin 11 Figure 3.2: Mode of travel to the border by country of trip origin (AM peak) 12 Figure 3.3: Mode of travel to the border by country of trip origin (Inter peak) 12 Figure 3.4: Mode of travel to the border by country of trip origin (PM peak) 12 Figure 3.5: Mode of travel to the border by zone of trip origin 13 Figure 3.6: Mode of travel to the destination by country of trip destination 13 Figure 3.7: Type of parking by destination country 14 Figure 3.8: Main purpose of travel by trip destination country 14 Figure 3.9: Main purpose of travel by trip destination country (AM peak) 15 Figure 3.10: Main purpose of travel by trip destination country (Inter peak) 15 Figure 3.11: Main purpose of travel by trip destination country (PM peak) 15 Figure 4.1: Household vehicle ownership 17 Figure 4.2: Average number of vehicles per household 18 Figure 4.3: Average engine size 19 Figure 4.4: Average annual trip distance 29 Figure 4.5: Bicycle ownership by zone 20 Figure 4.6: Average Number of Trips per Household 21 Figure 4.7: Average Number of Trips per Person 21 Figure 4.8: Average journey time by zone and mode 21 Figure 4.9: Trip Mode 22 Figure 4.10: Frequency of travel by mode of transport 22 Figure 4.11: Type of parking used 23 Figure 4.12: Type of parking by destination zone 23 Figure 4.13: Type of parking by destination purpose 24 Figure 5.1: Destination of passengers traveling on each route during AM peak 28 Figure 5.2: Destination of passengers traveling on each route during the Inter Peak 28

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 5.3: Destination of passengers traveling on each route during the PM peak 29 Figure 6.1: The Duration of Stay by Total Number of Vehicles and On-street Location 35 Figure 6.2: Entry and Exit Data 36 Figure 7.1: Route 1 40 Figure 7.2: Route 2 40 Figure 7.3: Route 3 41 Figure 7.4: Route 4 41 Figure 7.5: Route 5 42 Figure 7.6: Route 6 42 Figure 7.7: Route 7 43 Figure 8.1: Two-Way Pedestrian Flows 44 Figure 9.1: Locations visited since arriving in Gibraltar 46 Figure 9.2: Mode of travel to main destination (by destination) 47 Figure 9.3: Mode of travel to main destination 47 Figure 9.4: All modes used when in Gibraltar 48 Figure 9.5: Opinion of travelling in Gibraltar by mode 48 Figure 9.6: Stated future mode 49 Figure 9.7: Potential future travel modes by current modes 49 Figure 9.8: Taxi booking method 50 Figure 9.9: Taxi waiting time 50 Figure 10.1: Travel to school mode share (school average) 51 Figure 10.2: Preferred travel to school mode share (school average) 52 Figure 10.3: Cycle ownership (school average) 52 Figure 10.4: Mode Share 53 Figure 10.5: Encouraging Cycling 54 Figure 10.6: Encouraging Walking 55 Figure 10.7: Encouraging Bus Usage 55 Figure 10.8: Mode Share 56 Figure 10.9: Encouraging Car-Sharing 57 Figure 10.10: Encouraging Cycling 58 Figure 10.11: Encouraging Walking 59 Figure 10.12: Encouraging Bus Usage 60 Figure 11.1: Mode Share 61 Figure 11.2: Encouraging Car-Sharing 62 Figure 11.3: Encouraging Cycling 63 Figure 11.4: Encouraging Walking 64 Figure 11.5: Encouraging Public Transport 65 Figure 12.1: Commuting Mode Share 67 Figure 12.2: Accumulative Total of Commuting Journeys 68 Figure 12.3: Work-related Trips 69 Figure 12.4: Cumulative Total of Work-related Journeys 70 Figure 12.5: Leisure & Retail Mode Share 71 Figure 12.6: Cumulative Total of Leisure or Retail Journeys 72 Figure 12.7: Education Travel Mode Share 73 Figure 12.8: Cumulative Total of Education Journeys 74 Figure 12.9: Encouraging Alternatives – Bus Travel 75 Figure 12.10: Encouraging Alternatives - Car Sharing 76 Figure 12.11: Encouraging Alternatives - Cycling 78 Figure 12.12: Encouraging Alternatives - Walking 79

Table 2.1: Dominant parking type by interview location 6 Table 6.1: Location of Car Park Surveys 30 Table 6.2: Summary of Results for On and Off Street Car Parking Beat Surveys 31

Table 6.3: Summary of Results for On and Off Street Motorcycle Parking Beat Surveys 32

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Table 6.4: Proportion of Daytime Utilisation of Off-street Car Parking Spaces 33 Table 6.5: Total Number of Off-street Parking Spaces Available by Time Period 34 Table 12.1:Distribution of Online Survey Responses 73 Table 12.2:Most Commented Themes 80 Table 12.3:Most Commented Themes 81 Table 12.3:Most Commented Themes 82 Table 13.1:Headline Transport Statistics 83

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

1 Introduction

At the start of the development of the STTPP, detailed information on the current transport and travel characteristics of residents, commuters and visitors was obtained in order to determine the full picture of the issues, problems and challenges. The findings and analysis from these surveys were then used to support the development of the various policy initiatives and proposals.

A wide range of transport-related surveys were undertaken in spring 2013 including the following:

 Roadside Interviews (RSIs): surveys of drivers, pedestrians and cyclists on their trip;  Household Surveys asking a range of social and transport related questions;  Public Transport Surveys including bus passenger surveys and counts;  Parking Surveys including beat surveys, interviews and entry/exit counts;  Journey Time Surveys along the main routes throughout Gibraltar;  Pedestrian Counts at the major junctions throughout the town area;  Cruise Ship Surveys;  School and business surveys; and  General online surveys to obtain views on transport issues and solutions. Gibraltar has been split into seven areas, Spain is shown as an additional zone. This is shown in the figure below.

Figure 1.0: Analysis Zones

This data analysis report details the following for each of the surveys: Methodology, Results and Key Themes and Issues. A summary of the headline issues and conclusions from each survey is set out in this report.

1

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

2 Roadside Interview Surveys

2.1 Methodology This survey consisted of roadside interviews (RSIs) and classified counts at each site. A total of seven sites were surveyed as shown in Figure 2.0.

Figure 2.0: Roadside Interview Locations

A sample of drivers flowing into and within the area were interviewed in one direction, on one particular day at each site.

The interviews were carried out on the following days:

 Waterport: 17/04/2013 07:30-19:30  Queensway: 15/05/2013 08:30-18:30  Devil's Tower Road 23/04/2013 07:30-17:30  Winston Churchill Avenue: 21/05/2013 07:30-19:30  Queensway Quay: 29/05/2013 07:30-19:30  Prince Edwards Rd: 30/05/2013- 07:30-19:30  Governor’s Lane: 29/05/2013- 07:30-19:30

2

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

2.2 Results

2.2.1 Vehicle type Car use throughout all zones was an average of 69%, moped/motorcycle use was 24% and LGV/HGV use was 5%.

The Town area stands out as a zone of markedly lower car use than average (58%). It had a correspondingly higher moped/motorcycle use of 35%. Areas with above average car use include, , Upper Rock and Spain (Figure 2.1).

The Town area had a below average car use (58%), it was however above average at the Devils Tower Road (79%) and Winston Churchill Avenue (79%) interview sites. Car use from the Upper Rock was somewhat below average at the Queensway Quay survey site (62%) and car use from Spain was above the average of 78% at Queensway (82%), Devils Tower Road (89%), Governor’s Lane (95%) interview sites.

Figure 2.1: Vehicle type by zone

100%

90% 15% 18% 21% 19% 26% 24% 80% 29% 30% 35% 70% Other 60% Coach 50% Caravan Bicycle 40% 79% 78% LGV/HGV 71% 72% 68% 69% 64% 64% 30% 58% Moped/Motorcycle

20% Taxi Car 10%

0% Eastern Europa Northern Old Town Southern Spain Upper Westside Average (Base: (Base: District (Base: (Base: (Base: Rock (Base: (Base: 300) 251) (Base: 1114) 1587) 597) (Base: 1249) 6,325) 1023) 204)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,325

3

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

At 2% Spain also had the highest cycling user rate of all areas, with 34% of all cyclists being from Spain (Figure 2.2 below).

Figure 2.2: Zones by vehicle type

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,325

2.2.2 Vehicle occupancy The majority of car journeys were single occupancy (61% on average) followed by an average of 24% of car journeys with two occupants.

Respondents from Spain had the lowest levels of single car occupancy (52%) and respondents from the Town area and South District had the highest levels of single occupancy car mode share – 70% and 69% respectively.

Figure 2.3: Vehicle occupancy by zone

100% 90% 23% 23% 80% 27% 30% 28% 28% 70% 29% 34% 29% 60% 5 50% 4 40% 3 70% 69% 30% 59% 61% 64% 61% 57% 52% 57% 2 20% 1 10% 0% Eastern Europa Northern Old Town Southern Spain Upper Rock Westside Average (Base: 300) (Base: 251) District (Base: 1114) (Base: 1587) (Base: 597) (Base: 204) (Base: 1249) (Base: 6,325) (Base: 1023)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,325

4

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

The highest proportion of vehicles with five or more occupants originated from the Northern District (30%).

Figure 20.4: Zone by vehicle occupancy

100% 90% 80% Westside 70% Upper Rock 60% Spain 50% Southern 40% Old Town 30% Northern District 20% Europa 10% Eastern 0% 1 2 3 4 5 (Base: 4054) (Base: 1669) (Base: 377) (Base: 174) (Base: 40)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,325

2.2.3 Parking Roadside interviews included questions on parking behaviours. 40% of respondents used free off-street car parking and a further 37% used free on-street car parking. Only a small number (5%) used paid car parking. Around half of the respondents from Spain (48%) used free off-street car parking compared to only 27% of respondents from the Town zone (Figure 2.5).

Figure 20.5: Parking type by zone

100%

90%

80%

70% 40% 36% 30% 60% 43% 40% 37% 43% 45% Residential 45% 50% Paid on street

40% Free on street Paid off street 30% Free off street 48% 41% 42% 20% 37% 33% 36% 37% 27% 31% 10%

0% Eastern Europa Northern Old Town Southern Spain Upper Rock Westside Average (Base: 300) (Base: 251) District (Base: 1114) (Base: 1587) (Base: 597) (Base: 204) (Base: 1249) (Base: 6325) (Base: 1023)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,325

5

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Out of all the respondents who used paid on street parking, 33% were from the Westside area and the South District (Figure 2.6).

Figure 2.6: Zone by parking type

100% 14% 90% 18% 21% 21% 19% 33% 80% 3% 2% 3% 14% 3% 4% 70% 13% 10% 9% Westside 14% Upper Rock 60% 26% 22% Spain 24% 26% 50% 33% Southern

40% Old Town 16% 22% 14% Northern District 19% 30% 57% 17% Europa 20% 18% 15% 18% Eastern 14% 6% 10% 5% 7% 6% 3% 4% 6% 7% 6% 0% 4% 4% Free off street Paid off street Free on street Paid on street Residential Other (Base: (Base: 2156) (Base: 269) (Base: 2607) (Base: 18) (Base: 1237) 7)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,294 This pattern varies between interview locations. Table 2.1 gives the highest percentage of parking type by interview location:

Table 2.1: Dominant parking type by interview location Interview location Dominant parking mode Waterport 47% free off-street Queensway 42% free off-street Devils Tower Road 45% free off-street Winston Churchill Avenue 46% free on-street Queensway Quay 30% free off-street 36% free on-street 31% residential Prince Edwards Road 76% free on-street Governor’s Lane 49% free on-street

6

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

2.2.4 Trip purpose Interview respondents were asked about purpose at both origin and destination. The data shows that the origin purpose is split almost evenly, with 36% of respondents having departed from home, 33% from work and 27% from recreation/leisure activities.

Spain stands out with 68% of respondents having departed from home and only 5% from work. Other zones worth noting are the Northern District, Town, Upper Rock and Westside. Here the percentage of respondents having departed from home is below average between 21% and 26% (Figure 2.7).

Figure 2.7: Purpose at origin

100%

90% 13% 26% 27% 31% 27% 80% 24% 32% 30% 37% 70% 5%

60% 43% 27% 29% 33% Other 50% 44% 38% 39% Recreation/Leisure 40% 38% 68% Work/School 30% Home 43% 20% 39% 40% 36% 26% 25% 26% 10% 21%

0% Eastern Europa Northern Old Town Southern Spain Upper Rock Westside Average (Base: 300) (Base: 251) District (Base: 1114) (Base: 1587) (Base: 597) (Base: 204) (Base: 1249) (Base: 6325) (Base: 1023)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6.325 As would be expected, the dominant origin purpose during the AM peak is home (58%), compared to only 22% during the inter peak and 24% during the PM peak. There is little distinction between the inter peak average and the PM peak average (Figure 2.8).

Figure 2.8: Purpose at origin by time

100%

90% 10%

80% 32% 34% 29% 70%

60% Other 50% Recreation/Leisure 43% 36% 40% Work/School Home 30% 58%

20%

24% 10% 22%

0% AM Peak Average Inter Peak Average PM Peak Average (Base: 1928) (Base: 2642) (Base: 1735)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,305

7

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Trip purpose at the destination is evenly split between home (33%), work/school (34%) and recreation/leisure (29%). 4% indicated an “other” trip purpose. Comparing trip purpose at the destination between origin zones and destination zones, the following key points emerge:

 A number of areas generate a smaller proportion of work/school trips than they attract:

 Eastern District generates 33% and attracts 45%  Europa Point generates 29% and attracts 37%  Northern District generates 36% and attracts 46%  Town area generates 29% and attracts 39%

 Other areas generate a larger proportion of work/school trips than they attract:

 Spain generates 41% and attracts 12%  Upper Rock generates 39% and attracts 21%

 Most areas tend to attract and generate a similar proportion of leisure/recreation trips but two areas stand out:

 South District generates 24% and attracts 14%  Spain generates 39% and attracts 27%

Figure 2.9: Destination purpose by origin 100% 2% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 5% 4% 90% 27% 23% 26% 24% 22% 80% 33% 29% 39% 35% 70% 60% 33% 36% 29% 31% 50% 29% 40% 34% 40% 39% 41% Other 30% Recreation/Leisure 20% 39% 38% 41% 42% 34% 31% 33% Work/School 10% 21% 15% Home 0%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,325

8

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 2.10: Destination purpose by destination 100% 2% 5% 9% 5% 5% 3% 4% 4% 90% 31% 14% 27% 21% 22% 29% 27% 80% 35% 38% 70% 12% 60% 47% 50% 39% 36% 45% 46% 21% 39% 37% 40% Other 30% 60% Recreation/Leisure 20% 37% 33% 33% 27% 33% 10% 24% 23% 25% Work/School 0% Home

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 6,328

A comparison of destination purpose by origin between different interview locations shows that:

 At Queensway the proportion of work/school trips was substantially above average (48%) and home trips were below average (16%);  At Winston Churchill Avenue the proportion of home trips was substantially above average (50%) and work/school trips were below average (16%); and  At Prince Edwards Road the proportion of home trips was substantially above average (42%) and work/school trips were below average (22%). Similarly, a comparison of destination purpose by destination between different interview locations shows that:

 At Winston Churchill Avenue the proportion of home and leisure/recreation trips were substantially below average (14% and 6% respectively) and work/school trips were above average (64%); and  At Prince Edwards Road the proportion of work/school trips was substantially below average (23%).

9

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Analysing destination purpose data by time shows that during the AM peak the majority of respondents travelled to work or school (58%). This figure reduced to 32% in the inter peak and 13% in the PM peak. Home and leisure/recreational trips show an inverse pattern of increasing from AM towards PM peak (Figure 2.11).

Figure 2.11: Purpose at destination by time

100%

90% 16% 27% 80% 37% 70%

60% Other 58% 32% 50% 13% Recreation/Leisure

40% Work/School Home 30%

44% 20% 38%

10% 23%

0% AM Peak Average Inter Peak Average PM Peak Average (Base: 1634) (Base: 2226) (Base: 1414)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 5,274

2.3 Key themes and issues  Over half of car trips across Gibraltar are single occupancy which serves as a potential base from which to generate modal shift towards more sustainable forms of transport. This can be specifically targeted at areas of higher than average single occupancy car mode share such as the South District and Town area.  Parking charges and low availability can act as a barrier to car travel. However, the availability of free on- and off-street parking across Gibraltar means there is currently no barrier to car travel in terms of parking.  Leisure trips appear to be generated and attracted fairly evenly across Gibraltar. Home and work/school trips show a more distinct pattern. The Eastern District, Europa Point, Northern District and Town attract a larger proportion of work trips, suggesting an area of focus for employment. Similarly, Spain and Upper Rock attract a smaller proportion of work/school trips, suggesting an area of focus for residential purposes.

10

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

3 Roadside Interview Surveys (Pedestrians and Cyclists)

3.1 Methodology Roadside interviews (RSIs) for pedestrians and cyclists were carried out at the border. Respondents were asked to provide an indication on the journeys to and from the border. A sample of pedestrians and cyclists were interviewed on 4 June 2013 between 7:30am and 7.30pm.

3.2 Results The data is this section consists of roadside interviews with those who crossed the border on foot or by bicycle. It is important to note; this does not necessarily mean that they walked or cycled to the border. One example may be that they travelled to the border by bus, walked across and either walked or chose another mode for their onward journey.

3.2.1 Mode of transport Data shows substantial differences between the mode of transport used to travel to the border between those travelling to the border from Spain and those from Gibraltar. 39% of trips from Spain are by car compared to only 8% of trips from Gibraltar. The proportion of those taking the bus to the border from Gibraltar is around double (15%) to that of trips from Spain (7%). The majority of trips to the border from Gibraltar are walking trips (73%) compared to 53% of trips from Spain.

Figure 3.1: Mode of travel to the border by country of trip origin

Car (Driver) Spain 33% 6% 7% 36% 17% 1% (Base: 375) Car (Passenger) Bus Taxi

Gibraltar Walk < 10 mins 4%4% 15% 1% 29% 44% 2% (Base: 320) Walk > 10 mins Moped/ Scooter

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 695

11

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Comparing mode split at different times of day shows that walking is generally the dominant mode of travel to the border from Gibraltar for all time periods. Travel to the border by bus from Gibraltar is highest in the PM peak (20%) and lowest in the Inter peak (8%).

Mode split for travel to the border from Spain varies more substantially between different times of the day. In the AM peak car mode share is 53%. This declines to 31% in the Inter peak and 25% in the PM peak in favour of an increasing walking mode share.

Figure 3.2: Mode of travel to the border by country of trip origin (AM peak)

Car (Driver) Spain 46% 7% 5% 23% 18% 1% Car (Passenger) (Base: 162) Bus Taxi Gibraltar 7% 7% 13% 3% 25% 41% 1% Walk < 10 mins (Base: 68) Walk > 10 mins Moped/ Scooter 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 230 Figure 3.3: Mode of travel to the border by country of trip origin (Inter peak)

Car (Driver) Spain 27% 4% 10% 45% 13% 1% Car (Passenger) (Base: 143) Bus Taxi Gibraltar 3%4% 8%1% 34% 48% 1% Walk < 10 mins (Base: 90) Walk > 10 mins

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Moped/ Scooter

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 253

Figure 3.4: Mode of travel to the border by country of trip origin (PM peak)

Car (Driver) Spain 16% 9% 7% 44% 23% 0% (Base: 70) Car (Passenger) Bus

Gibraltar Taxi 2%3% 20% 0% 28% 44% 2% (Base: 173) Walk < 10 mins Walk > 10 mins 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 243

12

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

There are considerable differences in the mode of transport used to travel to the border between different parts of Gibraltar and similarly between different parts of Spain. However these figures need to be treated with caution because of the low base of some of the zones.

Figure 3.5: Mode of travel to the border by zone of trip origin 100% 11% 13% 90% 15% 28% 27% 26% 27% 14% 80% 13% Other 50% 70% 60% Moped/ Scooter 67% 68% 53% 16% Motorcycle 60% 26% Cycle 50% 50% 55% 5% Walk > 10 mins 40% 80% 67% 8% 74% 13% Walk < 10 mins 30% 20% 58% Taxi 50% 14% 6% 20% 23% 33% Bus 11% 5% 10% 18% 20% 21% Car (Passenger) 6% 10% 0% 5% Car (Driver) Eastern Europa Northern Old Town Southern Upper Westside La Linea, Outskirts Los Rest of Average (Base: 6) (Base: 3) District (Base: 65)(Base: 28) Rock (Base: Spain of La Barrios/ Spain (Base: (Base: 5) 112) (Base: Linea, ,(Base: 66) 101) 240) Spain Spain (Base: 38)(Base: 31)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 695 The mode split for travel to the destination shows that the majority of onward travel to locations in Gibraltar is on foot (68%). Walking mode share for onward journeys is similarly high in Spain (58%). Only few of those walking or cycling across the border from Spain make onward car journeys to reach their destination in Gibraltar (5%) whereas for destination in Spain this figure is 30%. Onward bus travel to destinations in Gibraltar is around double (21%) to that in Spain (10%).

Figure 3.6: Mode of travel to the destination by country of trip destination

Car (Driver) Spain 24% 6% 10% 21% 37% Car (Passenger) (Base: 376) Bus Taxi Gibraltar 21% 38% 30% Walk < 10 mins (Base: 320) Walk > 10 mins Cycle 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 696 There is less variation in the mode split by trip destination between the AM, Inter and PM peak as for the mode split by trip origin.

13

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

3.2.2 Parking Out of all car trips from the border to a destination in Gibraltar, 40% use free off street and 30% use free on street parking in Gibraltar.

Figure 3.7: Type of parking by destination country

Spain 20% 26% 9% 46% (Base: 70) Free off street Paid off street Free on street Gibraltar 40% 10% 30% 20% (Base: 30) Residential

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 100 Due to the low base, comparison of parking type by time period does not yield meaningful results.

3.2.3 Purpose of trip Around half (52%) of those travelling to Gibraltar travel for work/school. 34% travel to Gibraltar for leisure/recreation purposes and 7% travel home.

For those travelling to Spain, this is distinctly different. The vast majority (74%) travel home, 18% travel to Spain for leisure/recreation purposes and only 2% travel home.

Figure 3.8: Main purpose of travel by trip destination country

Spain 80% 13% 5% (Base: 375) Home Work/ School

Gibraltar Recreation/ Leisure 11% 48% 37% (Base: 321) Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 696

14

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

As would be expected, the trip purpose varies substantially throughout the day. 93% of trips to Gibraltar in the AM peak are work/school related. This decreases to 24% in the Inter peak and 14% in the PM peak. Conversely, leisure trips to Gibraltar start at only 2% in the AM peak and increase to 53% in the Inter peak and 67% in the PM peak.

While Inter peak and PM peak travel to Spain are somewhat similar, they differ from the AM peak where for 41% of trips to Spain the trip purpose is “home”, compared to 87% in the Inter and 80% in the PM peak. Leisure/recreation and “other” trip purpose are higher during the AM peak.

Figure 3.9: Main purpose of travel by trip destination country (AM peak)

Spain 41% 6% 32% 21% (Base: 68) Home Work/ School

Gibraltar Recreation/ Leisure 93% (Base: 162) Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 230 Figure 3.10: Main purpose of travel by trip destination country (Inter peak)

Spain 87% 10% (Base: 89) Home Work/ School

Gibraltar Recreation/ Leisure 8% 24% 53% 14% (Base: 144) Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 233 Figure 3.11: Main purpose of travel by trip destination country (PM peak)

Spain 80% 15% (Base: 163) Home Work/ School Recreation/ Leisure Gibraltar 17% 14% 67% (Base: 70) Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 233

15

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

3.3 Key themes and issues The analysis of the roadside interviews for pedestrians and cyclists shows substantial differences between the mode of transport used to travel to the border from Spain and those from Gibraltar. Whilst walking trips are the most common type for both origins, in Gibraltar they account for 73% whereas in Spain it is only 53%. Car usage is also much more prevalent in Spain where 39% of trips are by car compared to only 8% of trips from Gibraltar.

There is a distinct commuter flow from Spain into Gibraltar, contributing to congestion at the border crossing into Gibraltar in the AM peak and into Spain in the PM peak. 93% of trips into Gibraltar in the AM peak are for work or school and 80% of trips into Spain in the PM Peak are for trips returning home.

16

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

4 Household Survey Interviews (HSIs)

4.1 Methodology A total of 1,036 face-to-face Household survey interviews were conducted across Gibraltar. A team of interviewers were employed to conduct the interviews, approaching households on an individual basis. Interviewers were managed by two supervisors who coordinated the process and all interviewers undertook training to ensure the interview was conducted in a timely and consistent manner. Interviews were conducted on weekday evenings from 11 April 2013 to 10 June 2013.

To ensure an equal spread of responses, interviews were conducted on a proportional basis according to house dwelling density for each zone area. Each interview lasted up to 30 minutes and the quantity of detail received depended on the number of dwelling occupants and the amount of travel undertaken on the day of the interview.

Interviewers selected households to survey on a random basis. The interviewers were instructed to visit every 5th and 9th house on one side of the street and the 3rd and 6th on the opposite side. If there was no response then the interviewer approached the adjacent property. A refusal to participate in the interview was recognised as a non-response.

Responses were inputted electronically on a Portable Device (PDA) during the interview process to minimise the errors and time in data collection process. The responses were then downloaded from each device and collectively stored onto a central computer. The collective files were then cleaned to remove any errors or gaps in data collection.

4.2 Results 4.2.1 Vehicle Ownership Across Gibraltar, 60% of households own a 4x4 car, 19% own other cars and 32% own a motorcycle, scooter or moped. Overall vehicle ownership is thus high. The Upper Rock has particularly high car ownership (82%) which can partly be explained by its location.

Figure 4.1: Household vehicle ownership

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 1,052

17

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

The average number of cars owned per household including 4x4s and light vans is 1.2. The average number of motorcycles, mopeds and scooters owned per household is 0.6. As might be explained by their locations Upper Rock and Europa have a higher than average number.

Figure 4.2: Average number of vehicles per household

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 1,052

18

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

In terms of vehicle fuel type, across Gibraltar, 85% of vehicles are petrol powered, 14% diesel powered and 1% hybrid. Average engine size is shown in Figure 4.3 and the average annual trip distance in Figure 4.4.

Figure 4.3: Average engine size

1% 2% 2% 1% Average

2% 4% Less Than 1 Litre (1000CC) 20% 1 - 1.4 Litres (1500CC) 10% 1.5 - 2 Litres (1500-2000CC) 2.1 - 2.5 Litres 2.6 - 2.8 Litres 2.9 - 3.2 Litres 24% 3.3 - 3.8 Litres 33% 3.9 - 4.1 Litres 4.2 Litres + #

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 1,780

Figure 4.4: Average annual trip distance

1% 2% Average 3% 5% 3% 0 - 499 Km 4% 9% 500 - 999 Km

8% 1,000 - 1,999 Km 2,000 - 2,999 Km 3,000 - 3,999 Km 22% 4,000 - 4,999 Km 5,000 - 6,999 Km 20% 7,000 - 8,999 Km 9,000 - 11,999 Km 14% 8% 12,000 - 14,999 Km 15,000 - 17,999 Km

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 1,780

19

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

4.2.2 Walking and Cycling On average across Gibraltar, only 11% of households own adult bicycles and 13% own child bicycles. Bicycle ownership in the North District and Westside area are above average. In the North District 15% of households own adult bicycles and 19% of households own child bicycles. In Westside 18% of households own both adult and child bicycles. In the Town area adult bicycle ownership is average and child bicycle ownership is below average.

Around 3% of respondents experienced difficulty walking. Responses from the SouthDistrict and Upper Rock were below average whereas those where no zone was recorded were above average.

Figure 4.5: Bicycle ownership by zone

Mott MacDonald Base: 1,052

4.2.3 Trip Diary Respondents were asked to complete a trip diary detailing each trip undertaken for each member of the household. This includes all trips made irrespective of type of mode in a 24 hour period.

20

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Number of Trips On average each household makes 6.74 trips per day. This is also a fairly representative figure across most zones. Aside from Europa which has a higher than average number of trips per household – 8.31 trips per household and the East zone which has a lower than average number of trips with just 4.50 per household.

The average number of trips per person is 2.69, again this is fairly representative across all zones.Europa slightly more and the Eastside slightly less.

Figure 4.6: Average Number of Trips per Household Figure 4.7: Average Number of Trips per Person

9 3.5 8.31 3.07 8 3.0 2.85 7.09 7.09 2.73 2.77 6.97 7.00 2.67 2.69 7 6.74 2.58 6.25 2.5 6 2.14

5 2.0 4.50

4 1.5

3 1.0 2

0.5 1

0 0.0 Eastern Europa Northern Old Town Southern Upper Rock Westside Average Eastern Europa Northern Old Town Southern Upper Rock Westside Average District District

The average number of people per household who didn’t make any trips was 0.3 (equating to 296 people). A large proportion of these were in the Westside area and Town (98 and 79 people respectively). The predominant reason for not making a trip was no reason to go out (69%) with 16% stating homework and 14% stating illness.

Journey Time Average car journey time is just under 20 minutes. As would be expected the car journey time is highest for trips from Spain with an average of 34 minutes. The lowest journey time is for trips originating in Europa point with an average of only 14 minutes.

Figure 4.8: Average journey time by zone and mode

21

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Mode On average the majority of trips undertaken are walking trips (48%). As might be expected the number of walking trips from Europa is below average (6%). Northern District, Town and Westside display the highest number of walking trips with 54%, 58% and 58% respectively.

A fifth (20%) of all trips are car trips as the driver with an additional tenth (10%) as a car passenger. Conversely to walking trips, a greater proportion of trips by car are undertaken from Europa. 49% of all trips from the zone are by car as the driver with an additional 21% as a passenger. North District, Town and Westside have fewer car trips than average.

Motorcycle/Moped trips are the other predominant mode (15%) and is fairly similar across all zones.

Figure 4.9: Trip Mode

100% 6% 4% 13% 14% Wheelchair 90% 7% Walk > 5 mins 32% 31% 80% 39% 10% 38% Walk < 5 mins 17% 17% Van/Lorry 70% 12% 36% Taxi 6% School Bus 60% 21% 17% 22% Running 20% 50% 19% 20% Public Bus 6% 30% Other 17% 6% 40% 4% 2% Motorcycle/Moped as Passenger 14% 15% Motorcycle/Moped 30% 15% 12% 13% Cycle 14% 49% 10% 20% 6% 8% 9% Coach 29% 30% Car as Passenger 10% 19% 20% 18% 17% 15% Car as Driver Cable Car 0% Eastern Europa Northern District Old Town Southern Upper Rock Westside Average

Overall, moped/motorcycle passenger, taxi and car passenger trips occurred the most rarely. 76% of car drivers made a trip at least two to three times per week. This suggests a regular habit with the car as a default mode of transport. On the positive side, Figure 4.9 shows that the majority cyclists, pedestrians and public transport users also made regular trips more than twice per week.

Figure 4.10: Frequency of travel by mode of transport

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 7,211

22

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Parking The majority of parking across Gibraltar is free of charge, which is reflected by the survey results showing 99% of respondents parked for free in a range of locations. This presents a different picture from the results of the Road-Side Interviews which showed 40% of respondents used free off-street and only 37% of respondents used free on-street parking (Figure 2.5).

Figure 4.11: Type of parking used

Source: Mott Macdonald Base: 2,376

Broken down by zone, the data shows that free on-street and off-street parking in the East District and the Town exceeds the average. Residential parking in Europa Point, North District, South District, and Westside is substantially above average, whereas in the East District, Town and Upper Rock it is considerably below average (Figure 4.11).

Figure 4.12: Type of parking by destination zone

Source: Mott Macdonald Base: 2,376

23

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Analysis of household parking data by destination purpose shows, that the vast majority of trips and related parking were between home and work. Home made up 43% of destinations and work (usual place) constituted 24% of destinations. It is worth noting that of those travelling to work, only 26% parked in employer-owned (free) car parks. Across all other destination purposes a greater percentage used free on-street parking compared to free off-street parking. Due to the low base, employer’s business is excluded from this analysis.

Figure 4.13: Type of parking by destination purpose

100% 5% 11% 9% 5% 6% 6% Residential 90% 13% 23% 26% 80% Private 70% 58% Employers/ 44% 62% Company - Paid 60% 35% 60% 71% 62% 50% 66% 69% 59% 71% Private 50% 49% 100% Employers/ Company - Free 40% 7% 30% On Street - Paid 29% 5% 20% 37% 42% 33% 32% 29% 29% 23% 28% 26% 10% 21% 18% 23% On Street - Free 12% 0%

Off Street - Paid

Off Street - Free

`

Further results from dedicated parking surveys are outlined in greater detail in the Parking Section 6.

4.3 Key themes and issues  Vehicle ownership in Gibraltar is relatively high across Gibraltar, 60% of households own a car or 4x4, 19% own other cars and 32% own a motorcycle, scooter or moped. The Upper Rock has a particularly high car ownership (82%) which can partly be explained by its location.  Cycle ownership in the North District and Westside are above average which presents an opportunity for encouraging cycling in these areas. In the Town area adult bicycle ownership is average and child bicycle ownership is below average which could present a barrier for encouraging further uptake.  Overall mobility problems do not appear to present a substantial barrier to the uptake of walking and cycling as 96% of households reported no mobility problems. However, the mobility needs of different groups need to be considered when implementing new schemes.  There is substantial vehicle ownership in the North District,Town and Westside which may act as a barrier to encouraging walking and cycling if a car or moped/scooter is readily accessible.  Encouragingly nearly half of all trips are walking trips. However nearly a third of all trips are car trips. The average car journey time is less than 20 minutes indicating that many trips are of a short

24

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

distance and hence there is potential for some of these car trips to be undertaken by walking or cycling.  Parking data shows that a substantial proportion of household trips are commuting trips. Employer/company car parking only makes up a small percentage of parking locations, suggesting that a reduction in company car parking is unlikely to encourage a shift to more sustainable modes as free on- and off-street car parking is readily available.

25

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

5 Public Transport

5.1 Methodology

Public transport data obtained includes bus journey times and boarding & alighting counts, together with information from household surveys and operators.

Data on a route by route basis has been obtained, from which particular features of each have been identified. This includes the locations where most people board and alight services, the loading profiles and observed journey times. Detailed profiles of the data are presented in Appendix B.

5.2 Results

5.2.1 Bus Passenger Counts

Route 1 Upper Town Route Willis’s Road to Market Place This route has boarding taking place at Willis’s Road and Arengo’s Place with alighting throughout. Loadings are lighter than those from the town area with up to 13 passengers. The opposite direction illustrates the role of Market Place as the key boarding location, supplemented by St Bernard’s Hospital. Passengers leave the service towards the end of the route, notably Estate and Willis’s Road. Loadings in this direction are typically up to 22 passengers.

Route 2 Market Place to Europa Point This route shows the role of Market Place for boarding although other town origins are used. Passengers leave the service throughout the route and loadings are high, particularly on the 07:30 morning service with up to 60 passengers observed (although the bus capacity is 49). More typically, loadings were in the region of 20 to 30. In the opposite direction, boarding takes place along the route with the predominant alighting points in the town area including Convent Place, NatWest, Market Steps and Market Place. The average observed journey time was 18-20 minutes, with weekday services operating from 06:40 to 21:00 with a 15-minute frequency.

Route 3 Upper South District Circular South Pavilion Steps to Glacis Kiosk This route has the most boardings towards the start of the route and most alightings around the hospital, Waterport and Glacis Kiosk. Loadings are typically between 25 and 35. For journeys in the opposite direction, boarding takes place mainly at Referendum House and nearby locations with South Pavilion Steps being the most popular alighting point. The average observed journey time was 20 minutes from Referendum House or 29 minutes from South Pavilion Steps. Weekday services operate from 06:30 to 21:00 with a 15-minute frequency.

Route 4 Lower South District/Rosia to East Side/Both Worlds This route has boarding passengers between Rosia and Market Place with passengers alighting in the town area and beyond. Loadings vary but appear to be highest around Market Place but dwindle at the Both Worlds end of the route. In the opposite direction, passengers board throughout with the main destinations being the hospital, Cathedral Square and other town locations including Rosia. However, loadings in this direction are lower than those towards Both Worlds. The average observed journey time was 42 - 44 minutes, with weekday services operate from 08:45 to 21:00 with a 20-minute frequency.

Route 5 Frontier to Reclamation Road This route serves a substantial demand at the Frontier with the predominant alighting point being Market Place, supplemented by the hospital and Reclamation Road. Observed loadings were typically 35 to 50 and this is the only route on which larger buses can be operated with vehicles having a capacity of up to 70. Demand appears to be less in the opposite direction although observed boarding at Market Place appears to be less than might be expected. Most passengers alight at Frontier Customs. Typical loadings are up to 25 passengers. Journey times are subject to traffic conditions with traffic from the

26

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Frontier being variable from light to very heavy, the latter impeding the reliable working of buses. The average observed journey time was 16 minutes inbound and 19 minutes to the Frontier with a 10 minute frequency at peak times.

Route 7 Mount Alvernia Circular This route has very few passengers with typical loadings of less than three passengers. The service appears to contribute little to the passenger transport offer but is aimed at the home for elderly people (Mount Alvernia). The average observed journey time was 16 minutes, with weekday services operating from 11:00 to 14:30 and 16:00 to 19:00 with a 30-minute frequency overall.

Route 8 Black Strap Cove/Both Worlds to Reclamation Road This route has boarding passengers throughout, particularly at the , St Theresa's Church and Market Place. The main alighting points along the route are at Reclamation Road, the hospital and Market Place. In the opposite direction, town stops are the most popular boarding locations with St Theresa’s Church and Williams Way being the most popular alighting locations. Loadings are light at the Both Worlds end of the route. The average observed journey time was 19 minutes in each direction with a 30 minute frequency overall.

5.2.2 Bus Origin-Destination Survey The purpose of the bus survey was to obtain information about the origin and destination of passengers travelling on different bus services in Gibraltar.

The surveys were carried out by interviewing passengers on board the bus. The interviewers asked the respondent the question and recorded the response on the survey sheet. All surveys were conducted on a Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday between the survey time periods of 07:30 to 10:00 (AM Peak), 11:00 to 15:00 (InterPeak), and 15:30 to 19:00 (PM Peak).

Each of the eight bus routes were surveyed on a different day. The interviewer was expected to ask as many passengers as possible on board the service. Persons under the age of 16 were not interviewed. Passengers were not inclined to answer all questions and the respondent was allowed to stop the interview if the bus was approaching the alighting stop. Partially completed surveys were not used in the data analysis section.

27

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Passengers on individual routes were asked about the destination of their journey during each survey period. Figure 5.1shows the AM peak journey purposes, on 7 of the 9 routes the work/school journey purpose was the most common reason for travel, suggesting that many of the AM Peak passengers travel for commuter purposes. Only routes 4 and 7 had higher alternative reasons for travel, with 47% of passengers on route 4 traveling for recreational purposes. In contrast 67% of passengers on route 7 were traveling home.

Figure 5.1: Destination of passengers traveling on each route during AM peak

Source: Mott MacDonald

Figure 5.2 shows passengers who travelled on the Gibraltar bus network during the Inter Peak hours of 11:00 to 15:00. In contrast to the AM peak journey purposes, many of the Inter Peak passengers were using the bus service either for recreational purposes, or as a means to get home.

Figure 5.2: Destination of passengers traveling on each route during the Inter Peak

Source: Mott MacDonald

28

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 5.3 shows passengers who travelled on the Gibraltar bus network during the PM Peak hours of 15:30 to 19:00. During this travel period, there is a role reversal from the AM Peak journey purposes, with the majority of users now traveling home. This suggests that there is a large commuter ridership on the buses during these hours. There was also a large uptake of passengers traveling to a destination for recreational purposes.

Figure 5.3: Destination of passengers traveling on each route during the PM peak

Source: Mott MacDonald

5.3 Key Themes and Issues

Research undertaken on public transport in Gibraltar reveals the following key issues:  There is a daily influx of people across the border with Spain which generates significant demand for bus/taxi travel at the Frontier into the town centre;  Elongated north-south distribution of developed areas but a lack of direct bus routes extending from Europa Point to the Frontier/Airport;  It is widely agreed that facilities for bus users at Market Place are restrictive and all require passengers to cross the carriageway. Entry and exit is difficult for buses resulting in delays and journey unreliability.  Difficult topography and road alignments to access out-lying areas provide problems in terms of bus accessibility and the type of vehicles that can be used to serve these areas;  Despite free services (except Service 5) demand not as high as could be; and  There are peak period capacity issues across the network but during other times of the data reveals that bus service demand is low.

29

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

6 Parking Surveys

6.1 Methodology A series of parking surveys were undertaken to provide an indication of the existing parking situation at off-street and on-street car parks. The surveys included:

 Beat surveys (On-Street and Off-Street);  Entry and exit counts (Off-Street); and  Interviews (Off-Street). Other data relevant to parking was also collected as part of the broader modelling surveys. The locations where the surveys were completed are shown in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1: Location of Car Park Surveys On-Street Survey Locations Off-Street Survey Locations Air Terminal Prince Edward's Road Devil's Tower Road Reclamation Road Fish Market Road (this includes parking spaces on Fish Market Road) Grand Parade ICC shopping centre Waterport Road Ditch (separately identifying free and charged spaces) Line Wall Road (four in total) Naval Ground 1 Naval Ground 2 Queensway Air Terminal

Source: Mott MacDonald

6.1.1 Parking Beat Surveys An inventory of the parking areas to be surveyed was initially completed to establish the precise numbers of parking spaces in each location. Each space was then given a unique location number that would be used to record activity and associated registration number of the parked vehicle. For each visit or ‘beat’ the numerator would record the parked vehicle’s registration number for a specific space for that time or ‘beat’ period. Over the course of the day a profile of demand and duration of stay for each space would be realised that when aggregated, provided an overall demand against capacity for each surveyed location. The ‘beats’ were undertaken at hourly intervals between 07:30 and 19:30. The purpose of these ‘beat’ surveys was to establish two key parking behavioural characteristics and outcomes, namely:

 The duration of stay – the time a vehicle was parked in a specific space; and  Overall parking demand – and hourly and total demand for parking against capacity for each location.

6.1.2 Entry and Exit Counts To support the car park beat surveys, the number of vehicles entering and leaving the car park, throughout the survey period, were recorded. This helps determine the peak times for vehicles entering and exiting the car park and provides an indication of the number of ‘roaming’ vehicles when the car park is at full capacity. These were undertaken between 07:45 and 19:15.

30

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

6.1.3 Interviews Interviews were completed at the off-street car parks to ascertain a number of relevant issues including the purpose of journeys undertaken, trip destinations, vehicle occupancies and expected frequency of trips.

6.2 Results

6.2.1 Beat Surveys The results of the beat surveys presented as averages are shown in Table 6.5. These illustrate some key characteristics. Parking demand is high with nearly all car parking locations surveyed operating close to or at capacity1. Notable exceptions are the car parks where some form of control to limit stay is in place and these include 44 spaces in Landport Ditch, the privately operated ICC car park, Devil’s Tower Road and the Air Terminal. The average length of stay for parking reflects the dominant type of parking demand being long stay, and that these are likely to be commuter trips (also, refer to car park interview surveys in Paragraph 6.2.1.2). The average duration of stay is 6.8 hours for on-street locations and 5.3 hours for off-street car parks. However, a significant proportion of parking activities are for at least nine hours, particularly for on-street locations, suggesting that residential demand is taking place. Although the numbers are greater for on-street locations it is clear that a significant proportion of car parking capacity is being utilised for non-essential demand2. As a result, the opportunities for visitors to park in these core areas, particularly on-street and closer to retail attractors, is reduced which can be detrimental in a number of ways.

Table 6.2: Summary of Results for On and Off-Street Car Parking Beat Surveys On-Street Capacity Total Average Average Stayed all Stayed Stayed all (No. of No. of Overall Length day all day: day spaces) Vehicles Demand of Stay (No. of 9hrs. (% of (hours) vehicles) (% of vehicles) spaces) Line Wall Road 50 66 89% 7.6 36 72% 55% Prince Edward's Road 72 106 80% 7.1 42 58% 40% Reclamation Road 73 135 98% 6.7 50 68% 37% Rosia Road 65 127 97% 6.5 45 69% 35% Town Range 45 62 77% 7.1 27 60% 44% Waterport Road 69 135 94% 5.8 48 70% 36% Average On-Street 62 105 89% 6.8 41 66% 41% Off-Street Capacity Total Average Average Stayed all Stayed Stayed all (No. of No. of Overall Length day all day: day spaces) Vehicles Demand of Stay (No. of 9hrs. (% of (hours) vehicles) (% of vehicles) spaces) Air Terminal 167 244 50% 4.5 50 30% 20% Devil's Tower Road 154 75 47% 4.3 12 8% 16% Fish Market Road 75 189 100% 5.2 55 73% 29% Area3

1 Car parking that operates close to or in excess of 90% is considered to be at capacity, providing very little scope to absorb additional demand. 2 Non-essential demand is defined as parking activity that restricts the efficient use of parking space. An example might be all day parking in locations better suited to short stay for access to retail centres. 3 The Fishmarket Road area includes the uncontrolled parking areas on-street and the off-street parking immediately adjacent to the carriageway

31

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

On-Street Capacity Total Average Average Stayed all Stayed Stayed all (No. of No. of Overall Length day all day: day spaces) Vehicles Demand of Stay (No. of 9hrs. (% of (hours) vehicles) (% of vehicles) spaces) Grand Parade 403 803 85% 11.4 259 64% 32% ICC 345 525 47% 3.5 53 15% 10% Landport Ditch - Free 85 312 90% 4.1 50 59% 16% Landport Ditch - P&D 44 123 36% 1.7 0 0% 0% Naval Ground 1 75 207 91% 4.2 38 51% 18% Naval Ground 2 288 442 95% 8.0 202 70% 46% Queensway 365 699 83% 5.9 236 65% 34% Average Off-Street 200 362 72% 5.3 96 43% 22%

Table 6.3: Summary of Results for On and Off-street Motorcycle Parking Beat Surveys

On-Street Capacity Total Average Average Stayed all Stayed all Stayed all (No. of No. of Overall Length of day day: 9 hrs. day spaces) Vehicles Demand Stay (No. of (% of (% of (hours) vehicles) spaces) vehicles) Line Wall Road 173 326 89% 5 107 62% 33% Prince Edwards 7 15 66% 4 0 0% 0% Road Reclamation Road 83 194 76% 4 26 31% 13% Rosia Road 16 45 75% 3 4 25% 9% Town Range 35 49 91% 8 28 80% 57% Waterport Road ------Average On-Street 63 79% 5 33 40% 22% Off-Street Capacity Total Average Average Stayed all Stayed all Stayed all (No. of No. of Overall Length of day day day spaces) Vehicles Demand Stay (No. of (% of (% of (hours) vehicles) spaces) vehicles) Air Terminal ------Devil's Tower Road ------Fish Market Road 47 129 91% 4 19 40% 15% Area Grand Parade 75 160 94% 8 24 32% 15% ICC 10 10 40% 2 0 0% 0% Landport Ditch 19 52 69% 3 1 5% 2% Naval Ground 1 ------Naval Ground 2 24 36 77% 7 9 38% 25% Queensway 32 43 84% 8 21 66% 49% Average Off-Street 35 72 76% 5 12 30% 18%

There will be an increase in circuitous traffic movements as motorists look for convenient locations to park. This is likely to contribute to an increase in traffic congestion at certain times, which can disrupt the reliability of public transport services. Unlimited stay parking, particularly on-street and close to the core retail areas also impedes access to convenient shopping related demand. Shopper parking provision should ideally be restricted to a maximum of four hours on-street. Opportunities for shorter (1 and 2 hour parking) should also be catered for and this is supported by demand profiles shown below. Although the statistics are not as robust for motor cycle/moped parking due to the nature of the multiple parking activities taking place in a demarcated area, a similar approach was adopted for these surveys yielding similar demand characteristics.

32

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

It is clear from the sample of parking surveys undertaken that parking capacity does exist and that this can be utilised with appropriate management and control mechanisms in place.

To assist in the possible designation of parking areas, the off-street parking survey data has been further analysed to consider in greater detail the percentage of spaces being utilised at specific survey periods throughout the day and moreover, where and how much capacity exists. For every car park surveyed the total demand has been calculated for each survey period and compared to the car park’s capacity and presented as a ‘thermal grid’ of demand intensity. This supports the conclusions discussed above that demand is lowest where parking control mechanisms are in place. In addition, it also confirms the intensity of demand throughout the day at the more attractive parking locations. Table 6.4: Proportion of Daytime Utilisation of Off-street Car Parking Spaces

Off-Street 07:30 08:30 09:30 10:30 11:30 12:30 13:30 14:30 15:30 16:30 17:30 18:30 19:30

Air Terminal 8% 49% 47% 57% 69% 44% 44% 44% 44% 46% 59% 68% 71% (Total Spaces: 167)

Devil's Tower Road 10% 10% 12% 10% 13% 14% 14% 30% 29% 19% 18% 18% 18% (Total Spaces: 154)

Fish Market Road 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99% 99% (Total Spaces: 75) % % % % % % % % % % %

Grand Parade 34% 84% 86% 86% 86% 86% 88% 89% 90% 94% 96% 98% (Total Spaces: 403)

ICC 18% 18% 51% 62% 58% 60% 62% 63% 66% 34% 30% (Total Spaces: 345)

Landport Ditch - P&D AREA 7% 9% 24% 40% 58% 56% 51% 51% 51% 44% 47% 16% 13% (Total Spaces: 44)

Landport Ditch - 100 100 100 100 FREE AREA 99% 98% 98% 99% 95% 99% 89% 88% 93% % % % % (Total Spaces: 85)

Naval Ground 1 100 100 100 100 28% 99% 99% 99% 99% 95% 97% 88% 83% (Total Spaces: 75) % % % %

Naval Ground 2 93% 98% 99% 98% 99% 98% 98% 95% 94% 93% 94% 91% 91% (Total Spaces: 288)

Queensway 62% 82% 92% 92% 95% 94% 93% 93% 88% 87% 76% 64% 60% (Total Spaces: 365)

33

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Referencing these demand percentages against the individual car park capacities enables the production of Table 6.5. This table clearly shows where there is available car parking capacity and most importantly, provides us with an indication of how much, and where car parking is currently available in the central area of Gibraltar. The total available space calculation in Table 6.5 suggests that even at the busiest period of the day (16:30 and 17:30) there are at least 337 parking spaces available.

Table 6.5: Total Number of Off-street Parking Spaces Available by Time Period

Off-Street 07:30 08:30 09:30 10:30 11:30 12:30 13:30 14:30 15:30 16:30 17:30 18:30 19:30

Air Terminal 154 85 88 71 52 93 94 94 94 91 68 53 48 (Total Spaces: 167)

Devil's Tower Road 139 139 136 139 134 132 132 108 109 125 126 126 127 (Total Spaces: 154)

Fish Market Road 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Total Spaces: 75)

Grand Parade 265 64 58 58 56 56 48 46 40 26 18 10 (Total Spaces: 403)

ICC 283 283 169 130 145 138 130 126 119 229 243 (Total Spaces: 345)

Landport Ditch - P&D AREA (Total 41 40 33 26 19 20 22 22 22 24 23 37 38 Spaces: 44)

Landport Ditch - FREE AREA 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 4 1 9 10 6 (Total Spaces: 85)

Naval Ground 1 54 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 9 13 (Total Spaces: 75)

Naval Ground 2 19 7 3 6 3 6 7 13 16 20 18 27 27 (Total Spaces: 288)

Queensway 138 66 30 30 19 21 26 27 42 48 87 131 146 (Total Spaces: 365) TOTAL SPACES 1095 688 519 461 428 466 460 438 450 337 578 646 405 AVAILABLE

Referring specifically to the on-street parking locations surveyed and considering overall capacity, the total number of vehicles parking and the duration of stay suggests that there is a strong demand for shorter stay parking demand. Waterport Road and Fish Market in particular clearly accommodate significant parking demand for up to 1 hour.

34

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Conversely, and reflecting the location of the road being further away from the attractions to the North, Town Range can be seen to have a lower short term demand and is likely to provide valuable parking capacity for residential parking. Figure 6.1 illustrates this demand confirming that at the surveyed locations there is a strong demand for short stay parking (up to 1 hour). Furthermore, considering parking durations of up to 3 hours supports the consideration for restricting some parking areas to a maximum of between 2 and 4 hours.

Figure 6.1: The Duration of Stay by Total Number of Vehicles and On-street Location

70 Waterport Road Fish Market Road Town Range Rosia Road 60 Reclamation Road Prince Edwards Road 50 Line Wall Road Average

40

30

20

10

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

6.3 Entry and Exit Counts Considering the car park entry and exit counts, three examples have been presented that best illustrates the demand characteristics of the car parks depending on their location and perceived convenience. As can be seen from the graphs typical entry and exit demands experienced are dictated by the location and therefore, service that the car parking facility provides. Devil’s Tower Road car park is currently underutilised but does provide car parking for residents’ permit holders from the local area on the upper levels. Figure 6.2 shows that there is a predominant egress from the car park in the morning with a steady increase of entering activity towards the middle of the day. These vehicles appear to exit later in the day suggesting some shorter term parking activity. However, Naval Ground 1 (and similarly Naval Ground 2) demonstrates a sharp influx of parking in the morning followed by steady increase in exits throughout the day, suggesting commuter demand. Fish Market car park that incorporates the on-street parking in this area shows high levels of movement throughout the day. This is supported by other data sets that shows the car park to be at capacity for most of the day.

35

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 6.2: Entry and Exit Data

Devil’s Tower Road

25

20

15 Total Entering 10 Total Exiting 5

0 07:45 - 08:45 - 13:15 - 14:15 - 15:15 - 17:15 - 18:15 - 08.45 09:45 14:15 15:15 16:15 18:15 19:15

Naval Ground 1

50 45 40 35 30 25 Total Entering 20 Total Exiting 15 10 5 0 07:45 - 08:45 - 13:15 - 14:15 - 15:15 - 17:15 - 18:15 - 08.45 09:45 14:15 15:15 16:15 18:15 19:15

Naval Ground 2

60

50

40

30 Total Entering 20 Total Exiting

10

0 07:30 - 08:30 - 13:00 - 14:00 - 15:00 - 17:00 - 18:00 - 08:30 09:30 14:00 15:00 16:00 18:00 19:00

36

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 6.3: Entry and Exit Data

Fish Market Road & Car Park (on & off-street parking)

60

50

40

30 Total Entering Total Exiting 20

10

0 07:45 - 08:45 - 13:15 - 14:15 - 15:15 - 17:15 - 18:15 - 08.45 09:45 14:15 15:15 16:15 18:15 19:15

Interviews For the entry and exit interviews at car parks, not surprisingly for the locations surveyed the majority of trip modes were regularly the private motor car. However where facilities for motor cycles are provided, such as in Fish Market, parking demand from this mode was significant. Also noted was the number of occupants for these parking activities. On average 1,533 (64%) of cars included just a driver and 2,153 (90%) of all parking activities were by cars with just a driver and one passenger. Origins of parking trips were predominantly from home with 1,197 (54%), with 500 (20%) from the work place, suggesting either inward or outward commuting trips providing the significant proportion of parking demand which was evenly spread across all car parks surveyed. This was supported by the destinations after parking with work being the principal answer (596, 32%). However many also stated that home (615, 32%) was their destination after parking suggesting that on average, many car parks are used as longer term residential parking areas; this was not prevalent for the ICC and Fish Market car parks. The frequency of these trips was high with 706 (39%) stating that the trips were undertaken every weekday and 612 (20%) stating the trips were completed at least 2-3 times a week. The duration of stay of these parking activities supports the beat survey data suggesting that longer term parking takes place; 722 (40%) parking between 4 and 12 hours. Interestingly, 35% stated that they intended to park for one hour or less. The duration of stay was also dictated by car park location and control for example, shorter stays were seen in Landport Ditch where P&D operates in 44 spaces to limit waiting times. Not surprisingly location and convenience was cited as the main reason for choice of car parking location with 2,191 (80%) providing this as their reason for parking at that location.

6.4 Key themes and issues Research undertaken on parking in Gibraltar reveals the following key issues:  Demand for parking space in Gibraltar is very high and expected to increase in future with new development and regeneration opportunities being realised but it is believed that there is sufficient capacity in the current total supply to cater for existing demand;  The need for effective enforcement is essential to control existing parking regulations and residents parking zones as well as manage car parks;

37

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

 It is important to tackle the non-essential demand for parking spaces, particularly where there is alternative travel options (i.e. walking, cycling or use of the bus);  Of the total number of trips being made in Gibraltar that were surveyed, 64% of responses came from single occupancy vehicles and 90% with one passenger; and  The surveys also revealed that 54% of car parking trips start from home and 80% of household respondents stated their primary reason for parking as being location.

38

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

7 Vehicle Journey Times

7.1 Methodology

Journey Time surveys were undertaken on 7 defined routes through Gibraltar. Each route had several timing points along its length. To get an average journey time each route was run multiple times as shown in the table 7.1.

Table 7.1: Journey Time: Number of Runs Route AM Peak Inter Peak PM Peak 1 9 18 9 2 9 15 10 3 9 18 10 4 9 18 10 5 9 18 9 6 8 17 10 7 9 15 12

Source: Mott MacDonald

39

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

7.2 Results The following figures display the average journey times for all time runs of each route:

Figure 7.1: Route 1 Figure 7.2: Route 2

Route 1

Average speed of 23km/h across all time period. Traffic is slowest during the PM Peak but there is no significant change. On the route, traffic is slowest between points 8 and 9 around St Joseph’s School.

Route 2

Average speed of 33km/h with traffic free flowing at more than 31 km/h for the main body of each journey. Traffic reaches a peak speed of 56km/h during the Inter Peak.

40

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 7.3: Route 3 Figure 7.4: Route 4

Route 3

Average speed of 31km/h. It is notably slower during the AM and PM Peak particularly between Jumpers and St Joseph’s School.

Route 4

Average speed of just 19km/h across all time periods. Traffic is slowest during the AM Peak (13km/h) and increases throughout the day to 24km/h in the PM Peak. Traffic is consistently slow in the Piccadilly area.

41

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 7.5: Route 5 Figure 7.6: Route 6

Route 5

Average speed of 20km/h with the fastest runs during the PM Peak.

Route 6

Average speed of just 19km/h. Traffic is fastest travelling northbound between Trafalgar Interchange and Edinburgh Estate (points 14 -19) and slowest southbound between Portland and Queensway (points 4-8).

42

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 7.7: Route 7

Route 7

Average speed of 17km/h across all time periods. Traffic is fastest during the middle of the journey and slower at the start and end around Waterport Roundabout.

7.2 Key themes and issues  These journey time surveys highlight particular areas where traffic speeds are slow and hence where interventions should be thought out. Route 2 is the fastest route on average, with Routes 7 recording the slowest average speeds.  The road network around Ragged Staff Entrance and Trafalgar Roundabout is consistently congested. Similarly, Line Wall Road experience significant delays with average travelling speeds for some sections (between 6-8 and 17-19) are recorded at less than 10 kmph.

43

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

8 Pedestrian Counts

8.1 Methodology Pedestrian counts were undertaken at 30 sites across Gibraltar to get understanding of the busiest pedestrian routes. Counts were undertaken from 7am through to 7pm at quarterly intervals. The number of arms to the junction and the possible direction of pedestrian flows dictated the number of counts at each site. Details on the outputs for each site is contained in the Appendix D.

8.2 Results Figure 8.1 shows the combined pedestrian flows for all the pedestrian count surveys (30 sites). Stick diagrams for the individual sites are included in Appendix D. The graph indicates that Winston Churchill Avenue experiences a high level of pedestrian activity along with Main Street. The figure indicates that pedestrian activity dissipates outwards from these two roads.

Figure 8.1: Two-Way Pedestrian Flows

Source: Mott MacDonald

44

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

8.3 Key themes and issues

The highest flows of pedestrians are on Main Street and Winston Churchill Avenue between the frontier/airport to the junction with Bayside Road. There is also a large amount of pedestrian activity around Casements Square, the Coach Park and along Main Street towards Grand Parade and the Cable Car.

45

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

9 Cruise Ships

9.1 Methodology

Surveys of cruise ship passengers were undertaken to gain an understanding of the travel behaviour of visitors coming to Gibraltar. These surveys were undertaken on 8 April and 23 April 2013 to coincide with four cruise ships docking.

9.2 Results

9.2.1 Current travel behaviour A total of 93% of respondents to the cruise ship survey were British. Of those arriving in Gibraltar by cruise ship, 53% visited Main Street and a further 18% visited Upper Rock. All other destinations were visited by less than 10% of cruise ship passengers, suggesting that there is a concentration around Main Street and the Upper Rock.

Figure 9.1: Locations visited since arriving in Gibraltar

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 541

46

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Travel to these two destinations is already largely carried out by sustainable modes, particularly in the case of Main Street, this is facilitated by its proximity to the cruise terminal. 33% of cruise passengers walked to Main Street and 37% travelled to the Upper Rock by tourist bus.

Figure 9.2: Mode of travel to main destination (by destination)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 405 Overall, the most popular sustainable modes for travelling to their main destinations were tourist bus, shuttle and walking. Cycling and public bus were less popular (Figure 9.3).

Figure 9.3: Mode of travel to main destination

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 405

47

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

The mode split for all travel while in Gibraltar was similar (Figure 9.4). However there was a smaller percentage of trips by tourist bus (20%) in favour of walking trips (28%).

Figure 9.4: All modes used when in Gibraltar

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 225

Generally travel in Gibraltar is well perceived. 48% of respondents perceived travel as good and a further 40% perceived travel in Gibraltar as very good. 11% perceived travel as fair and only one respondent – using a tourist bus – perceived it as poor.

When looking at this by mode, it emerges that the tourist bus was most negatively perceived; 22% rated is as fair or poor. This was followed by public bus and shuttle which were both rated fair by 14% each. The cable car was rated fair by 11%.

Figure 9.5: Opinion of travelling in Gibraltar by mode

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Very Good Good 50% Fair 40% Poor 30% Very Poor 20% 10% 0% Tourist Bus Taxi Public Bus Bicycle Cable Car Shuttle Walk Coach (Base: 46) (Base: 45) (Base: 7) (Base: 1) (Base: 19) (Base: 42) (Base: 64) (Base: 1)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 225

48

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

9.2.2 Future travel behaviour The most popular mode of transport considered for future trips in Gibraltar was walking (46%), followed by taxi (20%) and tourist bus (14%).

Figure 9.6: Stated future mode

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 225

Breaking this down by current mode shows that a considerable number of respondents would continue to use the same mode as they are using at present. A number of results to highlight are:

 Of those currently travelling by tourist bus, 37% considered walking and 15% taxi as an alternative  58% of taxi users would continue to use a taxi  65% of cable car users would consider walking, and 11% would take a taxi or public bus as a future mode of travel  19% of shuttle users would use a taxi as an alternative mode The majority (81%) of those who currently walk, would continue to do so.

Figure 9.7: Potential future travel modes by current modes

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 225

49

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Overall taxi emerges as a popular alternative to current modes and the majority of current taxi users would continue to travel by taxi in future. Findings on taxi use specifically, show that it is a comparatively easy mode to use. The vast majority of taxis were picked-up at a taxi rank or hailed on-street and for 70% there was no waiting time with a further 17% waiting less than 5 minutes.

Figure 9.8: Taxi booking method Figure 9.9: Taxi waiting time

Source: Mott MacDonald Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 46 Base: 47

9.3 Key themes and issues

 Walking to a number of key destinations such as Main Street and the Town is already popular. There is however, potential for increasing these figures largely due to their relative proximity to the cruise terminal.  Travel in Gibraltar is generally well perceived. The greatest room for improvement is for tourist bus, public bus, shuttle and cable car services.  Whilst it is positive that almost half of the respondents consider walking as a future mode, the uptake of future unsustainable modes such as taxi should be discouraged. As the taxi is an ‘easy to use’ mode of transport which is readily available and has no to short wait times, discouraging its future uptake needs to be directly targeted at:

– Current tourist bus and shuttle users by improving the quality of tourist bus services;

– Cable car users by providing better alternatives in form of walking and public bus facilities; and

– Encouraging taxi users to switch to alternative modes.

50

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

10 School Travel

10.1 Methodology – Primary Schools

Each class in all schools was asked to complete a short hands-up survey in each class.

10.2 Results

The travel mode split across Gibraltar to school shows that around half of the children walk and a quarter travel by car. The next popular mode is school bus (10.6%). When interrogating this data further there are a number of schools that have a car mode share which is substantially higher than average.

Figure 10.1: Travel to school mode share (school average)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 1,981

51

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Pupils were also asked how they would like to travel to school. The results largely reflect the current actual mode split with the key difference that at present on 0.3% cycle to school whereas 16% indicated that they would like to cycle to school. Only 17% stated they would like to travel to school by car, compared to the 26% who currently do so.

Figure 10.2: Preferred travel to school mode share (school average)

71% of pupils stated that they currently own a bicycle suggesting that bicycle ownership is not a barrier to the uptake of cycling for travelling to school.

Figure 10.3: Cycle ownership (school average)

29.2%

Own a Bicycle Don't Own a Bicycle

70.8%

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 1,530

10.3 Key themes and issues

A considerable number of pupils already walk to school which is positive. However there is still an opportunity for increasing travel to school by sustainable modes even further by working directly with schools with an above average car mode share and exploring and addressing the barriers to the uptake of cycling as a mode of travelling to school.

52

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

10.4 Methodology - Secondary Schools

Secondary school pupils were asked to complete the travel survey online – 194 responses were received from two schools (Figure 10.4).

10.5 Results

Encouragingly already over 70% of pupils walk to school. No pupils stated that they currently cycle to school with nearly a fifth (17%) of pupils using a motorised vehicle (car, motorbike or moped) to travel to school. Over 10% of pupils travel to schools by public bus or school bus service.

Figure 10.4: Mode Share

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 194

53

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 10.5: Encouraging Cycling

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 194 Improving cycle lanes and providing secure cycle parking at school would be the most effective methods of encouraging pupils to cycle (42% and 38% respectively).Over a quarter would consider cycling if there were better road/cycling surfaces. However, although 46% stated that no improvements would encourage them to cycle to school, this is important as it means that over half of pupils would be interested in cycling, of which none currently do so.

54

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Based on the travel to school modal share, walking is by far most popular method of transport. Reducing or slowing traffic and improving footpaths would be the most effective ways to further encourage walking (36% and 31% respectively). Over a quarter would consider walking if there were more safe places to cross. However, over a fifth who don’t currently walk to school, state that nothing could be done to alter their behaviour.

Figure 10.6: Encouraging Walking

Mott MacDonald Base: 55

An increase in the reliability of services would be the most effective method to encourage the use of public transport (35%). An increase in the number of seats, bus routes and frequency were also popular improvement options (26%, 24% and 24% respectively.) 29% of pupils stated nothing would encourage them to use the bus. Proving dedicated bus facilities are not seen to be a significant factor to promote and encourage bus use for school pupils (9%).

Figure 10.7: Encouraging Bus Usage

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 172

55

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

10.6 Key themes and issues

Encouragingly already over 70% of pupils walk to school. However no pupils stated that they cycle and nearly a fifth us a motorised vehicle hence there is an opportunity to increase the use of sustainable modes even further.

10.7 Methodology - School Staff

School staff were also asked to complete an online travel survey – 55 responses were received from 10 schools.

10.8 Results

Whilst 30% of staff walked to school, over a third of the staff used the car (36%) either as a lone driver or with passengers and 29% used a moped or motorbike.

Based on the responses, nearly half (46%) of the school staff commuted to work by sustainable modes of transport (bus, cycle, walk or car-share – as driver or with passenger).

Figure 10.8: Mode Share

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 55

56

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

To determine what is required to support the school staff to commute more sustainably, respondents were asked to state what would encourage them to travel to work by certain modes. Half of the respondents saw a reserved parking space in a prime location as the most effective method to encourage car sharing. Over a fifth would consider car-sharing if parking charges were introduced or increased.

Encouragingly, less than 30% stated that nothing would encourage them to car-share. It is worth noting that only those who currently travel by car and taxi (including other) were asked to respond to this question, accounting for 14 school staff.

Figure 10.9: Encouraging Car-Sharing

Source; Mott MacDonald Base: 14

57

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Increasing the number and quality of cycle facilities on commuting journeys, including better surfaces and cycle lanes, are the main methods that would encourage more school staff members to cycle to work (42% and 31% respectively). Over a fifth would cycle if shower and locker facilities were available and if secure cycle parking facilities were available 17.5% would cycle. However, over a third of school staff (35%) would choose not to cycle regardless of improvements being made.

Figure 10.10: Encouraging Cycling

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 57

58

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Walking is already the most popular method of transport for school staff. To further encourage walking, providing safer crossing points and improving footpath conditions would be the most effective (36% and 31% respectively). Less than a fifth (18%) of respondents stated nothing would encourage them to walk.

Figure 10.11: Encouraging Walking

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 39

59

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Only 4% of school staff currently commutes by bus. Nearly two-thirds of school staff (61.5%) stated they are more likely to commute by bus if the frequency of buses serving their school were increased. Encouragingly, 46% of staff would consider bus travel if there was an increase in reliability. In addition, 40% may consider using the bus if live arrival information was available at bus stops.

Interestingly, the majority of staff would be more likely to consider commuting by bus if improvements were made than by walking or cycling. Only 8% stated that nothing would encourage them to travel by bus.

Figure 10.12: Encouraging Bus Usage 70.0%

61.5% 60.0%

50.0% 46.2%

40.4% 40.0%

30.8% 30.0%

20.0%

11.5% 10.0% 7.7% 7.7% 5.8% 3.8%

0.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 52

10.8 Key themes and issues

Encouragingly nearly half (46%) of school staff commute by a sustainable mode of transport (bus, cycle, walk or car share). However a quarter drive on their own as a lone driver hence there is an opportunity here to change travel behaviours to a more sustainable mode.

60

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

11 Workplace Travel Survey

11.1 Methodology

The workplace travel survey was an online survey sent to businesses in Gibraltar. 11 organisations participated in the survey returning 146 responses.

11.2 Results

The largest proportion of the Gibraltarian workforce commute to work by moped or motorbike (32%). Under a third of the workforce (28%) walk to work with a similar number (31%) of people commuting to work by car, whether that is as a lone driver or with passengers.

Based on the responses, only 45% of Gibraltar’s workforce commute to work by sustainable modes of transport (bus, cycle, walk or car-share –as passenger or with passenger).

Figure 11.1: Mode Share

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 146

61

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

To determine what is required to support the workforce to commute more sustainably, respondents were asked to state what would encourage them to travel to work by certain modes. For car-sharing, providing an incentive (18%) is seen to be the most effective method of encouragement. Nearly 15% of the workforce would consider car sharing if a car-share database was setup and over a tenth stated that reserved parking would be important. However, over half of respondents stated that nothing would encourage them to car-share. It is worth noting that only those who currently travel by car and taxi (including other) were asked to respond to this question.

Figure 11.2: Encouraging Car-Sharing

Source; Mott MacDonald Base: 34

62

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Increasing the quality and number of cycle facilities on commuting journeys, including better surfaces and cycle lanes, are the main methods that would encourage more of the workforce to cycle to work (32% and 35% respectively). Over a fifth of the workforce would also cycle if secure cycle parking was available at their workplace. Increasing the number of rental bikes would also have a positive effect. However, a third of the Gibraltarian workforce (35%) would continue not to cycle even if improvements were made.

Figure 11.3: Encouraging Cycling

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 144

63

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Based on the commuting modal share, walking is already popular. To further encourage walking, promoting the health benefits of walking would be most effective (25%). Similar providing better walking facilities on route to workplaces and providing shower & locker facilities at the workplace would also help to encourage people to walk to work (24% and 22% respectively). Over a third of those who don’t currently walk to work, state that nothing could be done to persuade them alter their behaviour.

Figure 11.4: Encouraging Walking

Source; Mott MacDonald Base: 105

64

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

The majority of Gibraltar’s workforce don’t currently travel to work by bus. Nearly half of respondents (46%) stated that would are more likely to commute by bus is the frequency of buses serving their workplace were increased. Encouragingly, over a quarter (27%) of the workforce would consider bus travel if live arrival information was available at bus stops and similarly a fifth of respondents (21%) would like to see service reliability improved. Interestingly, the Gibraltarian workforce are more likely to consider commuting by bus if a variety of improvements were made as only 28% of respondents stated that nothing would encourage them to travel by bus.

Figure 11.5: Encouraging Public Transport

Source; Mott MacDonald Base: 141

11.3 Key themes and issues

Based on the responses, only 45% of Gibraltar’s workforce commute to work by sustainable modes of transport (bus, cycle, walk or car-share –as passenger or with passenger). With nearly a fifth of workforce commuters travelling by car. as a lone driver. There is therefore an opportunity to encourage more sustainable modes of transport.

65

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

12 General Online Travel Survey

12.1 Methodology Residents and visitors of Gibraltar were encouraged to complete a comprehensive travel survey based on their typical travel behaviours for different types of trips, including commuting, work-related travel, leisure and education travel. The survey could be completed online and was promoted through the Government’s website and in local media. It attracted a total of 313 unique responses.

12.2 Results A higher percentage of responses were received from the South and Westside Districts (circa a third each) with approximately 10% of responses obtained from those living in the Town Area or Spain (12% and 11% respectively).

Table 12.1: Distribution of Online Survey Responses Percentage of District Number of Responses Responses (n=313) Eastside District 5 1.60% Europa Point 9 2.88% North District 23 7.35% South District 105 33.55% Spain 33 10.54% Town Area 37 11.82% Upper Rock 9 2.88% Westside District 92 29.39%

Source: Mott MacDonald

66

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Commuting Trips

Based on the responses from the General Survey, 87% stated they commute to work. Of these respondents, a similar percentage either walk to work or travel by motorbike or moped (27% each). Nearly a fifth of the population commute by car, as a lone driver and in total 30% of respondents use vehicles to commute to work (including car driver, as passenger or with passenger). A very low percentage of respondents stated that travel by bike (4%), and more than 10% travelling by public transport.

Figure 12.1: Commuting Mode Share Commuting 30% 28% 27%

25%

20% 20%

15% 11% 10% 8%

5% 4% 2% 1% 0% 0% Bus or coach Car (as Car Driver Car Driver Cycle Motorbike or Other Taxi Walk passenger) (on your (with moped own) passenger/s)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 272

67

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Based on the stated number of commuting journeys (272), nearly 60% of respondents commute for work ten times per week. With over four-fifths of respondents commuting between one and ten times per week. A fifth of respondents commute more than ten times per week, indicating that either they work more than five days per week or they travel during work breaks i.e. return home at lunchtime. A commuting journey constitutes as either travelling to work or travelling from work.

Figure 12.2: Accumulative Total of Commuting Journeys Cumulative Total of Commuting Journeys 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 15 16 20 25 30 No. of Commuting Journeys per week

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 272

68

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Work-related trips

Based on the responses to the General Survey, 58% of respondents travel for work-related purposes which include meetings and deliveries. The largest number of respondents travel for work on foot (30%) with an additional quarter travelling by motorbike or moped. Nearly a fifth (19.6%) travel for work by car as lone driver with a further 11% travelling with passengers. When compared to commuting patterns, this indicates that a number of vehicles are parked at the workplace all day and are only solely used for commuting purposes. Respondents are not likely to travel by public transport or by bike for work-related trips (5% and 2% ).

Figure 12.3: Work-related Trips Work-related trips 35% 30% 30% 26% 25% 20% 20%

15% 11% 10% 5% 4% 5% 2% 2% 1% 0% Bus or coach Car (as Car Driver Car Driver Cycle Light or Motorbike Other Walk passenger) (on your (with Heavy Good or moped own) passenger/s) Vehicle (LGV or HGV)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 184

69

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Of those who travel for work purposes (158 responses), a quarter only travel for work two times per week i.e. one return journey. Nearly 80% of respondents undertake five work-related trips per week (or ten single journeys) which approximately equates to one trip by working day. A tenth of respondents undertake between twelve and 24 work journeys per weeks; half of which are currently undertaking 20 journeys. A very small but significant percentage (2.5%), undertake 100 journeys per week indicating that they are continually travelling for work purposes.

Figure 12.4: Cumulative Total of Work-related Journeys

Cumulative Total of Work-related Journeys (n=272) 98% 100% 94% 95% 96% 88% 90% 90% 82% 79% 80% 70% 59% 60% 55% 50% 42% 40% 30% 25% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 15 16 18 20 24 25 30 40 50 56 60 65 70 75 100 No. of Commuting Journeys per week

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 272

70

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Leisure and Retail trips

Nearly 95% of respondents stated they travel for leisure and retail purposes during a typical week. Based on the responses, nearly half car-share (49.5%) with a further 18% travelling for leisure purposes in a car on their own. Only 5% choose to travel by bus for leisure purposes with even fewer choosing to cycle (2%). Although nearly 14% of respondents stated they walk when travelling for leisure, this is a significant reduction on the percentage of respondents who walk for commuting or work-related trips. The same pattern is reflected by those who travel by moped or motorbike (10%) indicating that walking and travelling by moped or motorbike are not popular modes of travel for leisure purposes.

Figure 12.5: Leisure & Retail Mode Share Leisure & Retail Mode Share

45% 42%

40%

35%

30%

25%

20% 18%

15% 14% 11% 10% 7% 5% 5% 2% 0% 1% 0% Bus or coach Car (as Car Driver Car Driver Cycle Motorbike Other Taxi Walk passenger) (on your (with or moped own) passenger/s)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 295

71

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Over half of those who travel for leisure or retail purposes, have undertaken at least six journeys per week with majority of respondents (89%) undertaking at least one leisure or retail trip per day (assuming one trip is two journeys). Only 17% of respondents undertake one trip or less per week.

Figure 12.6: Cumulative Total of Leisure or Retail Journeys

Cumulative Total of Leisure or Retail Journeys 97% 98% 100% 100% 97% 90% 90% 82% 84% 80% 70% 63% 60% 56% 50% 38% 40% 30% 17% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 20 22 24 25 28 40 60 80 No. of Leisure or Retail Journeys per week

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 295

72

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Education Travel

To provide further analysis on travelling for education, whether that is as a parent taking children to school or travel to college, the general survey focussed on education travel. 27% of respondents stated that they undertake travel for education purposes. Based on this percentage, the largest proportion stated that they travel by car with passengers (48%). This is not unexpected as it potentially accounts for parents taking their children to school. Over a quarter (27%) walk to their school or place of education. In total, only just over a third (37%) of respondents stated they travel on foot, public transport or bike for education purposes.

Figure 12.7: Education Travel Mode Share Education Mode Share 50% 45% 45% 40% 35% 30% 27% 25% 20% 15% 10% 7% 8% 5% 5% 5% 2% 1% 0% Bus or coach Car (as Car Driver Car Driver Cycle Motorbike Other Walk passenger) (on your (with or moped own) passenger/s)

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 85

73

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Based on those who travel for educational purposes, approximately a quarter undertake less than ten education journeys per week (27.5%). A significant proportion (40%) undertake ten education journeys per week with a further 19% undertaking 20 education journeys, indicating a large number of parents undertake four journeys per day to drop and pick-up their children from school or place of education. 5% of respondents undertake more than 20 journeys per week.

Figure 12.8: Cumulative Total of Education Journeys Cumulative Total of Education Journeys 100% 100% 95% 90% 80% 76% 68% 70% 70% 60% 50% 40% 27% 30% 24% 26% 20% 7% 8% 10% 1% 4% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 12 15 20 28 No. of Education journeys per week

Source: Mott MacDonald Base: 85

74

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Encouraging alternative modes

Out of the 701 responses, an increase in frequency of bus services would be the most effective method of encouraging bus travel (50.8%). Similarly an increase in the number of bus services to different destinations was popular (34.5%). 46.6% of responses stated the introduction of live bus arrival information would encourage them to sue the bus. Whilst nearly two fifths (39.3%) of responses stated an increase in reliability would encourage them to use the bus. Encouragingly only 11% of responses stated nothing would encourage them to use the bus.

Increasing the frequency of bus services was particularly popular in the Town Area and South District (62% and 59% respectively). This may suggest that these areas currently have low frequency bus services. An increase in services to different destinations was popular in Europa Point and Upper Rock (55% and 44%). Only 20% of responses from Eastside suggested these two options as an effective method of encouraging bus travel perhaps indicating the area already has a good bus service. The introduction of live bus arrival information was the most popular improvement method for responses from Eastside and Westside (60% and 57% respectively). It was also popular in Town Area (56%). It was significantly less popular in Spain (15%).

Figure 12.9: Encouraging Alternatives – Bus Travel

Source: Mott MacDonald

75

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

The overall most popular method for encouraging car sharing was reserved parking in prime locations for car sharers (34.5%). A fifth of responses thought a car share database would be the most effective option of encouraging car sharing. Introducing or increasing parking charges was not a popular option (10.4%). Despite this, 45.4% of responses indicated that nothing would encourage them to car share.

Reserved parking was the most popular improvement for 5 out of the 8 districts. It was particularly popular in Eastside and Europa Point (100% and 56%). In contrast, only 11% of responses from Upper Rock chose this option. A car share database was particularly popular in responses from Spain (42%). No one from Europa Point liked this option. Whilst introducing or increasing parking charges was generally unpopular, a third of responses from Europa Point stated introducing or increasing parking charges would encourage them to car share.

Respondents from the Eastside District could be the most influenced as only 22% stated nothing would encourage them to car share. Over 50% of responses from North District, South District and Upper Rock stated nothing would encourage them to car share.

Figure 12.10: Encouraging Alternatives - Car Sharing

Source: Mott MacDonald

76

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

The overall most effective method for encouraging cycling would be an increase in cycle facilities such as cycle lanes (47%). Over a third of responses stated better road and cycle surfaces (37.4%). An increase in the number of bike rental locations and bikes was also popular (17.6% and 15% respectively). However, over a third of responses stated nothing would encourage them to cycle (36.7%).

Responses stating an increasing in cycle facilities were particularly low in Eastside, Europa and Upper Rock (20%, 22% and 22% respectively). Similarly the same areas also had few people stating better road/cycling surfaces would encourage them to cycle (20%, 22% and 22% respectively). This may suggest that these are not issues in these areas.

Responses indicating an increase in the number of rental bike locations were particularly high in Eastside and Europa (40% and 33% respectively). A third of responses from Eastside also indicated an increase in the number of rental bikes would encourage them to cycle. This may suggest an improvement in the current bike rental service is required in these areas. In contrast few responses from the North District stated an increase in bike rental locations or rental bikes would encourage them to cycle (4.3% each).

Two thirds of responses from the Upper Rock stated nothing would encourage them to cycle. This is perhaps reflective of the terrain in the district. In contrast, only 28.3% of responses from Westside stated nothing would encourage them to cycle.

77

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Figure 12.11: Encouraging Alternatives - Cycling

Eastside District Encouraging Cycling Europa Point North District South District 60% Spain Town Area Upper Rock Westside District Average 50% 47%

40% 37% 37%

30%

20% 18% 15% 12% 10% 10% 4% 3%

0% Availability of Increase in cycle Information on Increase in the Increase in the Promotion of Better Nothing would Other cycle training to facilities on cycle facilities number of number of health benefits road/cycling encourage me increase journey (i.e. including rental bikes rental bike of cycling surfaces to cycle confidence cycle lanes) location of cycle available locations lanes and cycle parking

Source: Mott MacDonald

78

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

The most popular methods for encouraging walking are improved footpaths and safer crossing points (48.9% and 47.9% respectively). Over a quarter of responses indicated less or slower traffic would encourage them to walk (25.6%). Whilst 14% stated better lighting was needed to encourage people to walk more, encouragingly only 15% stated that nothing would encourage them to walk.

An improvement in footpaths was particularly popular in Europa Point (88.9%). This may suggest footpaths in this area are poor. In contrast, few people from Upper Rock and North District stated this option (33.3% and 34.8% respectively). Few people from Upper Rock and Spain stated safer crossing points as a method of encouraging them to walk (33% and 36%). Less or slower traffic was a popular improvement option in Europa Point, Spain and Town Area (44%, 42% and 40% respectively) suggesting this is a problem in these areas. No responses from Eastside stated this as an improvement option. However 20% of responses from this district stated better lighting suggesting this is an issue in the area.

Figure 12.12: Encouraging Alternatives - Walking

Source: Mott MacDonald

Open Ended Responses

A total of 282 respondents provided additional comments about what they perceive to be the traffic and transport problems in Gibraltar. This analysis provides unbiased feedback on the transport issues in Gibraltar. To help interpret the issues stated within the feedback, the comments have been reviewed and subsequently categorised into key themes. In total, 497 comments were received indicating that the majority of respondents provided more than one comment.

The main theme which was a common response from all of the districts is that there are too many cars or motorcyclists on the road. Nearly 30% of responses stated this along with a further 14% of respondents commenting that there is too much traffic, particularly during peak times. This is significant as it indicates that a good proportion of people who use the Gibraltar road network recognise that the level of traffic is an issue and that the number of vehicles is the main attributable factor for the congestion.

79

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Relating to these two themes, it was noted that respondents stated that some households in Gibraltar have too many vehicles which impact the number of vehicles on the roads (5.4%). Reducing the number of vehicles per household is one option to tackle the overall transport issues.

Other comments received indicate that the public transport system in Gibraltar is not reliable and therefore prevents local residents from using it (15%). One respondent from the South District summarised the general theme by commenting that “there is too much traffic on the roads, which means public transport (buses) can't be relied on to get anywhere on time”. The hours of operation was also raised as a concern, with bus services stopping at 9pm seen as a detrimental factor.

Over a tenth of responses (13%) commented that there was not enough available parking in Gibraltar. Some respondents indicated that the parking problems were caused by people having a second vehicle or spaces been taken up by abandoned vehicles.

In addition, a similar number of comments (11%) were received around the issue of people being too dependent on travelling in their own vehicle, particularly for short trips. Some comments argued that for these short journeys walking, cycling or using public transport are viable options. One comment from the West District attributed this dependency to laziness saying “People are too lazy to walk anywhere and think the distances in Gibraltar are 'too great' to walk. Destinations are too far away! There is also the perception that the bus is 'beneath me' and embarrassing to be seen on them”.

Table 12.2: Most Commented Themes - What do you perceive the traffic problems to be in Gibraltar? Eastside Europa North South Town Upper West Comment district point District District Spain Area Rock District TOTAL Too many 1 1 5 34 6 7 2 30 86 27.4% cars/motorcyclis ts on the road Issues with 0 1 2 19 6 6 0 12 46 14.6% public transport Too much traffic 1 1 2 13 8 5 1 13 44 14.0% especially during peak hours Not enough 0 0 4 11 2 7 3 15 42 13.4% parking available Issue of 0 3 0 5 5 7 2 14 36 11.5% dependency on private vehicles Frontier causes 0 0 1 15 1 3 0 8 28 8.9% traffic Quality of roads 0 0 3 7 4 3 0 5 22 7.0% are very poor/outdated Enforcement of 0 0 1 6 1 2 1 10 21 6.7% laws is poor Poor/Immature 0 0 4 7 3 0 0 6 20 6.3% quality of driving Too many cars 0 0 2 9 1 0 1 4 17 5.4% per household means too many cars on the road Overflow of 0 0 0 4 1 0 3 9 17 5.4% non-Gibraltarian people/cars

80

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

A total of 278 respondents provided additional comments about what they believe the solutions are to the traffic and transport problems in Gibraltar. In total, 438 comments were received indicating that majority of respondents provided more than one issue. The comments have been categorised into key themes to aide interpretation of the qualitative responses. Making improvements to the public transport network and services was the primary solution which was suggested by respondents with nearly 30% of respondents stating this. Providing a more direct and regular bus network and having more school buses were improvements suggested to encourage more people not to drive.

Over a fifth of respondents commented that improvements to the parking facilities were needed to improve the traffic and transport problems. This included providing more parking spaces at the Frontier, increasing parking in residential areas and providing Park & Ride facilities. The majority of those respondents stated that parking should be free to the user with one respondent from West District suggesting “all new buildings (especially when they are taking away parking spaces) should have two floors of parking one for the users/residents and another below for the general public”.

However 16% of respondents stated that the cost for using a car should be increased, suggesting the issue of charging for using vehicles is a polarised subject in Gibraltar. Introducing or increasing parking fees and re-introducing vehicle exercise duty were popular measures which were suggested to tackle the issue of abandoned vehicles and help discourage unnecessary car trips.

Supporting this argument, a tenth of comments stated that bans or restrictions should be imposed on vehicles or at certain places to reduce congestion, including the options of congestion charging, banning traffic in the town and increasing the driving age. In addition, 5% of responses commented that measures should be introduced to reduce the number of non-Gibraltarian vehicles on the road indicating that a small minority believe that there is an external solution to the transport problems in Gibraltar.

Table 12.3: Most commented themes - what do you think the solutions are to the traffic and transport problems in Gibraltar? Eastside Europa North South Town Upper West Comment district point District District Spain Area Rock District TOTAL Improve public 0 3 9 30 13 13 1 22 91 29.0% transport services (e.g. bus frequency, new bus services) Improving parking 3 0 2 25 3 9 5 22 69 22.0% facilities incl. park & ride Investment to 0 0 5 25 5 3 2 10 50 15.9% improve road quality (e.g. surfaces, signage) Increase costs of 0 3 1 22 1 7 1 14 49 15.6% using a car (e.g. car park charges, taxes) Reduce congestion 2 1 2 7 6 5 2 9 34 10.8% by imposing bans/ regulations Encourage walking 0 1 2 8 2 3 1 12 29 9.2% Encourage cycling 0 0 3 7 8 4 0 5 27 8.6% by improving accessibility Improve influence 0 0 2 7 0 3 0 13 25 7.9% of authorities Reduce numbers of 2 1 0 5 0 3 0 5 16 5.1% non-Gibraltar cars (in particular, Spain) Implement/encoura 0 0 2 5 3 2 0 4 16 5.1% ge 'greener'

81

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Eastside Europa North South Town Upper West Comment district point District District Spain Area Rock District TOTAL transport (e.g. hybrid transport, car sharing schemes)

A total of 258 respondents provided additional comments about how they could change their travel patterns to reduce the traffic and transport problems. In total, 285 comments were received which have been categorised into key themes. The overarching theme arising from the comments was that nearly a quarter of respondents stated that they already travel by sustainable modes of transport and therefore are already minimising their impact on the congestion problems.

Nearly 20% of respondents stated that they could use public transport to reduce the impact of traffic. Half of the people who made similar comments to this theme live in the Southern District suggesting the services in this area are under-utilised. Although one comment points out this could be due to a number of issues relating to reliability and routes stating that “to get to work in the Upper Town I have to take two buses from the south district. Not only this but the No1 bus that services the Upper Town travels along a route where the nearest bus stop to the south district is King's Wharf or at the bottom of Prince Edwards Road! At present if I wish to travel by bus I must factor in a 30min travel journey which for Gibraltar is ridiculous!!”

Over 15% of respondents stated that they are unable to change their travel patterns due to work commitments, mobility issues and family commitments. Although this is not ideal, it does indicate that potentially 85% are more flexible with how they can travel.

Approximately a quarter of the respondents stated that they could walk or cycle more (11% and 13% respectively). Walking looks to be a more viable option to promote in the Town Areas and West District and there seems to be an appetite for cycling in Southern and West District. However, many of the comments stated that improvements need to be made to make walking and cycling viable options. On top of issues of safety, one comment from the Town Area states that “Gibraltar is a compact locality. It should use this opportunity to base its transport system on walking and cycling (including using electric cycles). This could be achieved by providing better cycling and pedestrian infrastructure.”

Table 12.4: Most commented themes - How could you change your travel patterns to reduce the traffic and transport problems? Eastside Europa North South Spai Town Upper West TOTA Comment district point District District n Area Rock District L I travel sustainably 0 0 8 20 8 15 4 22 77 24.2% already Use public transport 2 2 2 26 9 9 1 11 62 19.8% Cannot change 1 3 4 26 3 3 1 10 51 16.2% Cycle as a mode of 0 1 0 17 3 3 0 17 41 13.0% transport Walk 0 0 0 8 5 4 0 16 33 10.5% Get a more efficient 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 4 0.1% vehicle or car share Avoid travelling by car 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4 0.1% during rush hour/or less frequently Introduce online 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 0.1% shopping at supermarkets Limit use of the car 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 0.1% Park in town 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.1%

82

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

13 Summary

A summary of the data analysis and key headline data is presented in Table 13.1 below.

Table 13.1: Headline Transport Statistics from the STTPP Surveys (Spring 2013)

Survey Type Headline Results Conclusions  All areas car mode share was 69%  High single occupancy indicating  Moped/motorcycle mode share was 24% an individual dependence of Roadside  LGV/HGV mode share was 5% private vehicle ownership Interviews  61% of car journeys were single (Vehicles)  Personal transport used equally occupancy for all trip purposes indicating RSI and traffic  Destination purpose: dependency on vehicles counts at seven – 33% Home  Measures for mopeds and sites – 36% Work/School motorbikes need to be integral to plan – 27% Leisure

 Over 60% use a car to get from Spain to  Better pedestrian routes (Quality, border runway closure warning, road Roadside  Majority of people are walking from the crossings, pavement widths) Interviews border into Gibraltar. Likely to walk for  Bus services (high priority (Pedestrian & more than 10 minutes Cyclists) access, reduced waiting, better  Taxi and bus used for medium/longer stop, more direct services, distance trips coordination)  Average journey speeds between 17 – 33  Measures to improve journey Journey Times km/h time reliability should be  Journey times typically slower during AM introduced Seven set routes peak periods analysed repeated  Current scenario effects travel by over several days  Journey times slower and more variably public transport on routes around the Town area  Majority of visitors travel to Main Street  Not many visitors choose to walk while in Gibraltar with nearly on fifth also on first visit will consider doing so visiting Upper Rock next time Cruise Ships  The largest percentage of visitors travel  Better pedestrian infrastructure by Tourist Bus while a 40% travel by taxi and information needed or shuttle bus.  Coordination of taxi and shuttle  A third of visitors walk to Main Street buses for Cruise Ship visits  Additional services & frequency  A large number of passenger board key issues services at Market Place  Market Place stops are  Heavy demand on most services in the Public Transport inappropriate for a modern bus AM peak interchange  Some route/sections have limited number  Priority for Buses of passengers i.e. Route 7  Improve Information & Ticketing:  Urban realm and pedestrian  Winston Churchill Avenue and Main priority routes attract significant Street have highest pedestrian activity Pedestrian footfall  Pedestrian activity is highest on network Counts  Expand key walking routes and adjacent to Main Street and generally some destinations are not dissipates outwards conducive for walking  60% of residents own a car with highest prevalence in Upper Rock.  High need and usage of private vehicle Household Survey  76% of car drivers made a trip at least Interview two to three times per week  Vehicles trips could be undertaken by more sustainable  Average car journey time is just under 20 modes due to trip length/time minutes

83

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan Summary Data Analysis Draft Report

Survey Type Headline Results Conclusions  Introduce measures to encourage this  Coordinated car park designation  On average high usage of on (93%) and – better use of existing space off (71%) street parking spaces  Strategic signing to car parks –  Over 40% of vehicles parked on-street reduce circuitous movements Parking stay all day (23% for off-street vehicles)  Demand management through  Nearly 65% vehicles single occupancy, charging and enforcement with 90% having one passenger  Supported by technology – ANPR, phone payments, VMS

 More than half of primary school children  Latent demand for cycling to walk to school school Primary School  Significant number of pupils would prefer  Need to introduce initiatives to Hands-up survey to cycle to school (at cost to car) encourage and promote cycling and walking (i.e. training,  70% of pupils own a bike activities, infrastructure)  Traffic management measures need to be introduced around  Over two-thirds of students walk to school school roads  Reducing or slowing traffic would  Support should be provided to Secondary School encourage more students to walk Online Survey schools to introduce measures to  Improving reliability of bus services would promote sustainable travel encourage bus travel  Cooperation with bus and school services

 32% commute to work by moped or  Support should be given to motorbike (32%). businesses to help encourage Workplace Online  Two-thirds of respondents would walk or active travel Survey cycle if facilities improved  Bus services need to be  More people would commute by bus if reviewed/improved to meet frequencies increased commuter needs

 Moped/Motorbike, car (no passengers)  General public are likely to travel and walking main modes by alternative modes if  ¼ of people living in the Town Area infrastructure is available General Travel would walk more if there was less traffic Survey  Improvements to public realm or it was slower. (similar to pedestrianisation of  1/4 of respondents would cycle more if Main Street) would have dual- the number of cycle facilities increased benefits

Source: Mott MacDonald Limited

84

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan

Appendix B – Survey Data Bus Data Results (Based on results obtained in 2013 through traffic and transport surveys)

November 2016 Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Appendix B1

Route 1 Willis’s Road to Market Place: Passenger Boarding

16

14

12

10

8 0614 0745 6 0845 0915 4 0945 1445 1545 2 1745 1845

0

Bahia Bar Bahia

Willis's Road Willis's

Grove

Market Market Place

Arengo's Arengo's Place

Morellos RampMorellos

Waterport Road Waterport

Gardiner's Gardiner's Road

Varyl Begg Begg EstateVaryl

Reclamation Road Reclamation

Trafalgar Cemetery Harbour MidEstate

Sir William JacksonWilliam Sir

Bishop Bishop Canilla house

St. Bernard'sSt. Hospital Commonwealth Parade Commonwealth Queensway Quay SouthQuayQueensway

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 1 Willis’s Road to Market Place: Passenger Alighting

0

-2

-4

-6

-8 0614 0745 -10 0845 0915 -12 0945 1445 -14 1545 1745 1845

-16

Bahia Bar Bahia

Willis's Road Willis's

Market Market Place

Arengo's Arengo's Place

Morellos RampMorellos

Waterport Road Waterport

Gardiner's Road

Varyl Begg Begg EstateVaryl

Reclamation Road Reclamation

Trafalgar

Mid Harbour MidEstate

Bishop Canilla house Canilla Bishop

St. St. Bernard's Hospital

Commonwealth Parade Commonwealth Queensway QuaySouthQueensway

Sir William Jackson William Sir Grove Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 1 Willis’s Road to Market Place: Passenger Loading

16

14

12

10

8 0614 0745 6 0845 0915 4 0945 1445 1545 2 1745 1845

0

Bahia Bar Bahia

Willis's Road Willis's

Grove

Market Market Place

Arengo's Arengo's Place

Morellos Ramp Morellos

Waterport Road Waterport

Gardiner's Road

Varyl Begg VarylEstate

Reclamation Road Reclamation

Trafalgar Trafalgar Cemetery

Mid HarbourMid Estate

Sir Sir William Jackson

Bishop Canilla house Canilla Bishop

St. St. Bernard's Hospital Commonwealth ParadeCommonwealth Queensway QuaySouthQueensway Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 1 Market Place to Willis’s Road: Passenger Boarding

22

20

18

16

14

12 0541 10 0725 8 0815 0914 6 1345 1415 4 1515 2 1715 1815

0

Europort

Arengo's

King's Wharf King's

Willis's Road Willis's

Market Place Market

Artillery Arms Artillery

Wilson's Ramp Wilson's

Edinburgh House Edinburgh

Reclamation Road Reclamation

Mid Harbour Estate Harbour Mid

Sacred Heart Church Heart Sacred St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St. Moorish Castle Estate Castle Moorish Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 1 Market Place to Willis’s Road: Passenger Alighting

0

-2

-4

-6

-8

-10 0541 -12 0725 -14 0815 0914 -16 1345 1415 -18 1515 -20 1715 1815

-22

Europort

Arengo's

King's Wharf King's

Willis's Road Willis's

Market Place Market

Artillery Arms Artillery

Wilson's Ramp Wilson's

Edinburgh House Edinburgh

Reclamation Road Reclamation

Mid Harbour Estate Harbour Mid

Sacred Heart Church Heart Sacred St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St. Moorish Castle Estate Castle Moorish Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 1 Market Place to Willis’s Road: Passenger Loading

24 22 20 18 16 14

12 0541 10 0725 0815 8 0914 6 1345 1415 4 1515 2 1715 1815

0

Europort

Arengo's

King's Wharf King's

Willis's Road Willis's

Market Place Market

Artillery Arms Artillery

Wilson's Ramp Wilson's

Edinburgh House Edinburgh

Reclamation Road Reclamation

Mid Harbour Estate Harbour Mid

Sacred Heart Church Heart Sacred St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St. Moorish Castle Estate Castle Moorish Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Appendix B2

Route 2 Market Place to Europa Point: Passenger Boarding

40

35

30

0510 25 0626 0725 20 0730 0855 0910 15 1310 1319 10 1430 1500 1655 5 1755

0

Mosque

Brympton

Shorthorn

Rock Hotel Rock

Old Casino Old

Elliot's Way Elliot's

Buena Vista Buena

Glacis KioskGlacis

North GorgeNorth

Europa Point Europa

Market PlaceMarket

War Memorial

Orange Cathedral Cathedral Square Referendum Gate

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 2 Market Place to Europa Point: Passenger Alighting

0

-5

-10

-15

0510 -20 0626 0725 -25 0730 0855 0910 -30 1310 1319 -35 1430 1500 1655

-40 1755

Mosque

Brympton

Shorthorn

Rock Hotel Rock

Old Casino Old

Elliot's Way Elliot's

Buena Vista Buena

Glacis KioskGlacis GorgeNorth

Europa Point Europa

Market PlaceMarket

War Memorial

Orange Bastion

Cathedral Cathedral Square Referendum Referendum Gate

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 2 Market Place to Europa Point: Passenger Loading

65 60 55 50 45 40

35 0510 0626 30 0725 25 0730 0855 20 0910 15 1310 1319 10 1430 5 1500 1655 0

1755

Mosque

Brympton

Shorthorn

Rock Hotel Rock

Old Casino Old

Elliot's Way Elliot's

Buena Vista Buena

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

North GorgeNorth

Europa Point Europa

Market Market Place

War Memorial

Orange Orange Bastion

Cathedral Cathedral Square Referendum Referendum Gate

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 2 Europa Point to Market Place: Passenger Boarding

20

15

10 0540 0657 0755 0925 0940 5 1340 1350 1510 1526 1825

0 1725

Mosque

Natwest

Brympton

Shorthorn

Rock Hotel Rock

Buena Vista Buena

Europa Point Europa

Market Place Market

Market Steps Market

Garrison Gym Garrison

Trafalgar Cem Trafalgar

Naval Hospital Naval Convent Place Convent

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 2 Europa Point to Market Place: Passenger Alighting

0

-5

-10 0540 0657 0755 0925 0940 -15 1340 1350 1510 1526 1825

-20 1725

Mosque

Natwest

Brympton

Shorthorn

Rock Hotel Rock

Buena Vista Buena

Europa Point Europa

Market Place Market

Market Steps Market

Garrison Gym Garrison

Trafalgar Cem Trafalgar

Naval Hospital Naval Convent Place Convent

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 2 Europa Point to Market Place: Passenger Loading

40

35

30

25

20 0540 0657 0755 15 0925 0940 10 1340 1350 1510 5 1526 1825

0 1725

Mosque

Natwest

Brympton

Shorthorn

Rock Hotel Rock

Buena Vista Buena

Europa Point Europa

Market Place Market

Market Steps Market

Garrison Gym Garrison

Trafalgar Cem Trafalgar

Naval Hospital Naval Convent Place Convent

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Appendix B3

Route 3 South Pavilion Steps to Glacis Kiosk: Passenger Boarding

15

10

0728 0730 5 0736 0807 0830 0843 0902

0

Rosia

Bahia Bahia Bar

Rosia Rosia Plaza

Cumberland

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Victoria House

Terminus

Waterport Road Waterport

New Mole House New Mole

Jumper's Building Jumper's

Varyl Begg VarylEstate

Trafalgar Trafalgar Cemetery

Mid Harbour MidEstate

St. Joseph's St. School

South Pavilion SouthSteps

Bishop Bishop Canilla House

St. Bernard's St. Hospital

Commonwealth Parade Commonwealth Queensway Quay SouthQuayQueensway Sir William Jackson William Sir Grove

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 3 South Pavilion Steps to Glacis Kiosk: Passenger Alighting

0

-5

0728 -10 0730 0736 0807 0830 0843 0902

-15

Rosia

Bahia Bar Bahia

Rosia PlazaRosia

Cumberland

Glacis KioskGlacis

Victoria Victoria House

Waterport Waterport Road

New Mole House New Mole

Jumper's Building Jumper's

Varyl Begg Begg EstateVaryl

Trafalgar Cemetery Harbour MidEstate

St. Joseph's St. School

Bishop Bishop Canilla House

St. Bernard's St. Hospital

Commonwealth Parade Commonwealth

Queensway Quay SouthQuayQueensway Sir William Jackson William Sir Grove

South Pavilion Steps Pavilion Terminus Steps South

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 3 South Pavilion Steps to Glacis Kiosk: Passenger Loading

40

35

30

25

20

0728 15 0730 0736 10 0807 0830 0843 5 0902

0

Rosia

Bahia Bahia Bar

Rosia PlazaRosia

Cumberland

Glacis KioskGlacis

Victoria Victoria House

Terminus

Waterport RoadWaterport

New Mole House New Mole

Jumper's Building Jumper's

Varyl Begg Begg Estate Varyl

Mid Harbour MidEstate Trafalgar Trafalgar Cemetery

St. Joseph's St. School

South Pavilion Pavilion Steps South

Bishop Bishop Canilla House

St. Bernard's St. Hospital

Commonwealth Parade Commonwealth Queensway Quay SouthQuayQueensway Sir William Jackson William Sir Grove

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 3 Referendum House to South Pavilion Steps: Passenger Boarding

15

10

0750 0750 5 0815 0840 0900 0922 0939

0

Rock Hotel Rock

Old Casino Old

Schomberg

Elliot's Way Elliot's

King's Wharf King's

Ocean Village Ocean

Terminus

Shorthorn Farm Shorthorn

Constitution House Constitution

Europort Building 8 Building Europort

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Mid Harbour Estate Harbour Mid

Referendum House Referendum

South Pavilion Steps Pavilion South

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St. GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 3 Referendum House to South Pavilion Steps: Passenger Alighting

0

-5

0750 -10 0750 0815 0840 0900 0922 0939

-15

Rock Hotel Rock

Old Casino Old

Schomberg

Elliot's Way Elliot's

King's Wharf King's

Ocean Village Ocean

Shorthorn Farm Shorthorn

Constitution House Constitution

Europort Building 8 Building Europort

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Mid Harbour Estate Harbour Mid

Referendum House Referendum

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St. GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA

South Pavilion Steps Terminus Steps Pavilion South

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 3 Referendum House to South Pavilion Steps: Passenger Loading

30

25

20

15

0750 0750 10 0815 0840 0900 5 0922 0939

0

Rock Hotel Rock

Old Casino Old

Schomberg

Elliot's Way Elliot's

King's Wharf King's

Ocean Village Ocean

Terminus

Shorthorn Farm Shorthorn

Constitution House Constitution

Europort Building 8 Building Europort

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Mid Harbour Estate Harbour Mid

Referendum House Referendum

South Pavilion Steps Pavilion South

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St. GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Appendix B4

Route 4 Rosia to Both Worlds: Passenger Boarding

20

18

16

14

12

10

8 0912 0937 6 1042 1302 4 1344 1425 2 1545 1701

0 1825

Bahia Bar Bahia

Cumberland

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Grove

Market Place Market Market Place Market

Williams Way Williams

Ocean Village Ocean

NatWest Bank NatWest

Victoria House Victoria

Convent Place Convent

Eastern Beach Eastern

Rosia Terminus Rosia

Waterport Road Waterport House Faulknor

New Mole House Mole New

Jumpers Building Jumpers

Varyl Begg Estate Begg Varyl

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Trafalgar Cemetery Trafalgar

Sir William Jackson William Sir

Notre Dame School Dame Notre

St. Theresas Church Theresas St.

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St.

Both Worlds Terminus Worlds Both GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 4 Rosia to Both Worlds: Passenger Alighting

0

-2

-4

-6

-8

-10 0912 -12 0937 1042 -14 1302 1344 -16 1425 1545 -18 1701 1825

-20

Bahia Bar Bahia

Cumberland

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Market Place Market

Market Place Market

Williams Way Williams

Ocean Village Ocean

NatWest Bank NatWest

Victoria House Victoria

Convent Place Convent

Eastern Beach Eastern

Rosia Terminus Rosia

Waterport Road Waterport

Faulknor House Faulknor

New Mole House Mole New

Jumpers Building Jumpers

Varyl Begg Estate Begg Varyl

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Trafalgar Cemetery Trafalgar

Notre Dame School Dame Notre

St. Theresas Church Theresas St.

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St.

Both Worlds Terminus Worlds Both GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA

Sir William Jackson Grove Jackson William Sir

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 4 Rosia to Both Worlds: Passenger Loading

20

18

16

14

12

10 0912 8 0937 1042 6 1302 1344 4 1425 1545 2 1701 1825

0

Bahia Bar Bahia

Cumberland

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Grove

Market Place Market

Market Place Market

Williams Way Williams

Ocean Village Ocean

NatWest Bank NatWest

Victoria House Victoria

Convent Place Convent

Eastern Beach Eastern

Rosia Terminus Rosia

Faulknor House Faulknor

Waterport Road Waterport

New Mole House Mole New

Jumpers Building Jumpers

Varyl Begg Estate Begg Varyl

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Trafalgar Cemetery Trafalgar

Sir William Jackson William Sir

Notre Dame School Dame Notre

St. Theresas Church Theresas St.

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St.

Both Worlds Terminus Worlds Both GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 4 Both Worlds to Rosia: Passenger Boarding

12

10

8

6

0913 4 0945 1310 1326 1445 2 1740

0

BahiaBar

South Gate

RosiaPlaza

CatalanBay

Glacis Kiosk

Caleta Hotel

Market Place

Ocean Village

New Harbours

EasternBeach

Orange Bastion

RosiaTerminus

Waterport Road

Alameda House

Jumpers Building

CathedralSquare

Varyl Begg Estate

Referendum Gates

Constitution House

Albert Risso House

Referendum House

Park & Ride Garage

British War Memorial

St. Theresa's Church

St. Bernard's Hospital

Both Worlds Terminus

GASA Swimming Pool

Sir William Jackson Grove Governors Meadow House

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 4 Both Worlds to Rosia: Passenger Alighting

0

-2

-4

-6

0913 -8 0945 1310 1326 -10 1445 1740

-12

Bahia Bar Bahia

South Gate South

Rosia PlazaRosia

Catalan BayCatalan

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Caleta Hotel Caleta

Market PlaceMarket

Ocean VillageOcean

New Harbours

Eastern BeachEastern

Orange Orange Bastion

Rosia Rosia Terminus

Waterport Waterport Road

Alameda House Alameda

Jumpers Building

Cathedral Cathedral Square

Varyl Begg Begg Estate Varyl

Referendum Referendum Gates

Constitution House Constitution

Albert Risso Risso House Albert

Referendum Referendum House

Park Park & Ride Garage

British War Memorial British

St. Theresa's Church Theresa'sSt.

St. St. Bernard's Hospital

Both Worlds Terminus WorldsBoth

GASA Swimming GASAPool

Sir Sir William Jackson Grove Governors Meadow Governors House Meadow

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 4 Both Worlds to Rosia: Passenger Loading

12

10

8

6

0913 4 0945 1310 1326 2 1445 1740

0

Bahia Bar Bahia

South Gate South

Rosia Rosia Plaza

Catalan BayCatalan

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Caleta HotelCaleta

Market Market Place

Ocean Village Ocean

New New Harbours

Eastern BeachEastern

Orange Orange Bastion

Rosia Rosia Terminus

Waterport Road Waterport

Alameda House Alameda

Jumpers Jumpers Building

Cathedral Cathedral Square

Varyl Begg VarylEstate

Referendum Referendum Gates

Constitution House Constitution

Albert Risso Risso House Albert

Referendum House

Park Park & Ride Garage

British War War Memorial British

St. Theresa's Church Theresa'sSt.

St. Bernard's St. Hospital

Both Worlds Terminus WorldsBoth

GASA SwimmingGASA Pool

Sir William Jackson William Sir Grove Governors Meadow Governors House Meadow

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Appendix B5

Route 5 Frontier to Reclamation Road: Passenger Boarding

55

50

45

40

35 0740 30 0749 0823 25 0839 0912 20 1318 1332 15 1359 10 1432 1514 5 1730 1751

0 1817

GASA

Frontier

Hospital

Avenue

Market Market Place

Glacis EstateGlacis

Ocean Village Ocean

Edinburgh Estate Edinburgh

Winston Churchill Winston

Reclamation Road Reclamation Waterport TerracesWaterport

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 5 Frontier to Reclamation Road: Passenger Alighting

0

-5

-10

-15

-20 0740 -25 0749 0823 -30 0839 -35 0912 1318 -40 1332 1359 -45 1432 -50 1514 1730 -55 1751

1817

GASA

Frontier

Hospital

Market Market Place

Glacis Estate Glacis

Ocean Village Ocean

Edinburgh Estate Edinburgh

Reclamation Road Reclamation Waterport TerracesWaterport

Winston ChurchillWinstonAvenue

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 5 Frontier to Reclamation Road: Passenger Loading

55

50

45

40

35 0740 30 0749 0823 25 0839 0912 20 1318 1332 15 1359 10 1432 1514 5 1730 1751

0 1817

GASA

Frontier

Hospital

Avenue

Market Market Place

Glacis EstateGlacis

Ocean Village Ocean

Edinburgh EstateEdinburgh

Winston Churchill Winston

Reclamation Road Reclamation Waterport TerracesWaterport

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 5 Reclamation Road to Frontier: Passenger Boarding

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 5 Reclamation Road to Frontier: Passenger Alighting

0

-5

-10

-15 0812 -20 0839 0910 0935 -25 1335 1346 -30 1430 1446 -35 1533 1745 1811

-40 1843

Gib V Gib

Frontier

Bahia Bahia Bar

Market PlaceMarket

Las PalmerasLas

Watergardens

Frontier Customs Frontier

Varyl Begg VarylEstate Reclamation Road Reclamation

Winston Churchill Avenue ChurchillWinston

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 5 Reclamation Road to Frontier: Passenger Loading

40

35

30

25 0812 0839 20 0910 0935 15 1335 1346 1430 10 1446 1533 5 1745 1811

0 1843

Gib V Gib

Frontier

Bahia Bahia Bar

Avenue

Market Market Place

Las PalmerasLas

Watergardens

Frontier CustomsFrontier

Winston Churchill Winston

Varyl Begg VarylEstate Reclamation Road Reclamation

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Appendix B6

Route 7 Mount Alevnia Circular: Passenger Boarding

4

3

2

1100 1130 1200 1 1231 1259 1329 1354

0

Trafalgar

Rock Hotel Rock

Elliot's Way Elliot's

NatWest Bank NatWest

Convent Place Convent

Orange Bastion Orange

Cathedral Square Cathedral

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Referendum Gates Referendum

British War Memorial War British Mount Alvernia Terminus Alvernia Mount Mount Alvernia Terminus Alvernia Mount

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 7 Mount Alevnia Circular: Passenger Alighting

0

-1

-2

1100 1130 1200 -3 1231 1259 1329 1354

-4

Trafalgar

Rock Hotel Rock

Elliot's Way Elliot's

NatWest Bank NatWest

Convent Place Convent

Orange Bastion Orange

Cathedral Square Cathedral

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Referendum Gates Referendum

British War Memorial War British Mount Alvernia Terminus Alvernia Mount Mount Alvernia Terminus Alvernia Mount

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 7 Mount Alevnia Circular: Passenger Loading

4

3

2

1100 1130 1200 1 1231 1259 1329 1354

0

Trafalgar

Rock Hotel Rock

Elliot's Way Elliot's

NatWest Bank NatWest

Convent Place Convent

Orange Bastion Orange

Cathedral Square Cathedral

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Referendum Gates Referendum

British War Memorial War British Mount Alvernia Terminus Alvernia Mount Mount Alvernia Terminus Alvernia Mount

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Appendix B7

Route 8 Both Worlds to Reclamation Road: Passenger Boarding

14

12

10

8 0830 0900 6 0931 1330 1400 4 1435 1458 2 1730 1801 1837

0 1900

Catalan BayCatalan

Caleta HotelCaleta

Market PlaceMarket

Ocean VillageOcean

Eastern BeachEastern

Edinburgh Edinburgh House

Constitution House Constitution

Albert Risso Risso House Albert

Referendum Referendum House

Park Park & Ride Garage

St Theresa's StChurch

St Bernards HospitalBernardsSt

Both TerminusBoth Worlds GASA Swimming GASAPool

Reclamation Road Terminus Road Reclamation

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 8 Both Worlds to Reclamation Road: Passenger Alighting

0

-2

-4

-6 0830 0900 -8 0931 1330 1400 -10 1435 1458 -12 1730 1801 1837

-14 1900

Catalan BayCatalan

Caleta Caleta Hotel

Market PlaceMarket

Ocean VillageOcean

Eastern Beach Eastern

Edinburgh House Edinburgh

Constitution House Constitution

Albert Risso Risso House Albert

Referendum Referendum House

Park & Park Garage Ride

St Theresa's StChurch

St Bernards HospitalBernardsSt

Both Worlds Terminus WorldsBoth GASA Swimming Pool GASA

Reclamation Reclamation Road Terminus

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 8 Both Worlds to Reclamation Road: Passenger Loading

14

12

10

8 0830 0900 6 0931 1330 1400 4 1435 1458 2 1730 1801 1837

0 1900

Catalan BayCatalan

Caleta HotelCaleta

Market Market Place

Ocean Village Ocean

Eastern Beach Eastern

Edinburgh House Edinburgh

Constitution House Constitution

Albert Risso AlbertHouse

Referendum House

Park & Park Garage Ride

St Theresa'sSt Church

St BernardsHospitalSt

Both Worlds Terminus WorldsBoth GASA SwimmingGASA Pool

Reclamation Road Terminus Road Reclamation

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 8 Reclamation Road to Both Worlds: Passenger Boarding

16

14

12

10

8 0800 0825 0900 6 1300 1330 4 1401 1428 1655 2 1731 1800

0 1829

Bahia Bar Bahia

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Market Place Market

Williams Way Williams

Terminus

Eastern Beach Eastern

Faulknor House Faulknor Waterport Road Waterport

Grove(GibV)

Varyl Begg Estate Begg Varyl

Reclamation Road Reclamation

Sir William Jackson William Sir

Notre Dame School Dame Notre

St Theresas Church St Theresas Both Worlds Terminus Worlds Both

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 8 Reclamation Road to Both Worlds: Passenger Alighting

0

-2

-4

-6

-8 0800 -10 0825 0900 -12 1300 1330 -14 1401 1428 1655 -16 1731 1800

1829

Bahia Bar Bahia

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Market Place Market

Williams Way Williams

Eastern Beach Eastern

Waterport Road Waterport

Faulknor House Faulknor

Varyl Begg Estate Begg Varyl

Notre Dame School Dame Notre

St Theresas Church Theresas St

Both Worlds Terminus Worlds Both Reclamation Road Terminus Road Reclamation

Sir William Jackson Grove(GibV) Jackson William Sir

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 8 Reclamation Road to Both Worlds: Passenger Loading

16

14

12

10

8 0800 0825 0900 6 1300 1330 4 1401 1428 1655 2 1731 1800

0 1829

Bahia Bar Bahia

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

Market Place Market

Williams Way Williams

Terminus

Eastern Beach Eastern

Waterport Road Waterport House Faulknor

Grove(GibV)

Varyl Begg Estate Begg Varyl

Reclamation Road Reclamation

Sir William Jackson William Sir

Notre Dame School Dame Notre

St Theresas Church St Theresas Both Worlds Terminus Worlds Both

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Appendix B8

Route 9 Rosia Terminus to Market Place: Passenger Boarding

22

20

18

16

14 0745 0830 12 0852 0930 10 1328 8 1348 1430 6 1453 1455 4 1530 1722 2 1800 0 1820

1900

Bahia Bar Bahia

Cumberland

Grove

Market Place Market

Ocean Village Ocean

NatWest Bank NatWest

Victoria House Victoria Place Convent

Rosia Terminus Rosia

Waterport Road Waterport

New Mole House Mole New

Jumpers Building Jumpers

Veryl Begg Estate Begg Veryl

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Trafalgar Cemetery Trafalgar

Sir William Jackson William Sir

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St. GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA Market Place Terminus Place Market

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 9 Rosia Terminus to Market Place: Passenger Alighting

0

-2

-4

-6

-8 0745 -10 0830 -12 0852 0930 -14 1328 1348 -16 1430 -18 1453 1455 -20 1530 1722 -22 1800 1820

1900

Bahia Bar Bahia

Cumberland

Market Place Market

Ocean Village Ocean

NatWest Bank NatWest

Victoria House Victoria

Convent Place Convent

Rosia Terminus Rosia

Waterport Road Waterport

New Mole House Mole New

Jumpers Building Jumpers

Veryl Begg Estate Begg Veryl

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Trafalgar Cemetery Trafalgar

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St.

GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA Market Place Terminus Place Market

Sir William Jackson Grove Jackson William Sir

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 9 Rosia Terminus to Market Place: Passenger Loading

18

16

14

12

0745 10 0830 0852 8 0930 1328 6 1348 1430 4 1453 1455 2 1530 1722 1800 0 1820

1900

Bahia Bar Bahia

Cumberland

Grove

Market Place Market

Ocean Village Ocean

NatWest Bank NatWest

Victoria House Victoria

Convent Place Convent

Rosia Terminus Rosia

Waterport Road Waterport

New Mole House Mole New

Jumpers Building Jumpers

Veryl Begg Estate Begg Veryl

Fish Market Steps Market Fish

Albert Risso House Risso Albert

Trafalgar Cemetery Trafalgar

Sir William Jackson William Sir

St. Bernard's Hospital Bernard's St.

GASA Swimming Pool Swimming GASA Market Place Terminus Place Market

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 9 Market Place to Rosia Teminus: Passenger Boarding

16

14

12

10

0726 8 0800 0828 6 0904 1305 1330 4 1403 1428 2 1502 1700 1734 0

1830

South Gate South

Rosia PlazaRosia

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

New Harbours

Orange Orange Bastion

Rosia Terminus Rosia

Alameda House Alameda

Jumpers Jumpers Building

Cathedral Sqaure

Referendum Referendum Gates

British War War Memorial British Market Place Market Terminus

Governors Meadow House Governors Meadow

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 9 Market Place to Rosia Teminus: Passenger Alighting

0

-2

-4

-6

0726 -8 0800 0828 -10 0904 1305 1330 -12 1403 1428 -14 1502 1700 1734 -16

1830

South Gate South

Rosia Rosia Plaza

Glacis Kiosk Glacis

New New Harbours

Orange Orange Bastion

Rosia Rosia Terminus

Alameda House Alameda

Jumpers Jumpers Building

Cathedral Cathedral Sqaure

Referendum Referendum Gates

British War BritishMemorial Market Market Place Terminus

Governors Meadow Governors House Meadow

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix B: Survey Data Bus Data Results

Route 9 Market Place to Rosia Teminus: Passenger Loading

16

14

12

10

0726 8 0800 0828 6 0904 1305 1330 4 1403 1428 2 1502 1700 1734 0

1830

South Gate South

Rosia PlazaRosia

Glacis KioskGlacis

New New Harbours

Orange Orange Bastion

Rosia Terminus Rosia

Alameda House Alameda

Jumpers Jumpers Building

Cathedral Cathedral Sqaure

Referendum Gates

British War War Memorial British Market Place Terminus Market

Governors Meadow House Governors Meadow

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan

Appendix C – Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

October 2016

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Appendix C1

Route 1 Boarding Daily Average (Aug 2016)

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20

0

13- Gib 5 13-

7- Kings 7- Wharf

1- Market 1- Place

9 -Wilsons Steps 9 -Wilsons

5-Trafalgar Road

15- Market 15-Place

2- Arengos Palace 2-

14- Watergardens 14-

4- Gardeners 4- Road

11- Arengos Arengos Palace 11-

2- Edinburgh House 2-

3- RoadFlat Bastion 3-

6- Queensway Quay 6-

3- Reclamation Road 3-

12- Varyll Begg VaryllEstate 12-Begg

5- Europort Building 8 Building Europort 5-

11- Reclamation Reclamation Road 11-

12- Castle steps Castle(Artil) steps 12-

6- Mid-Harbour Estate6-

4- St.Bernards Hospital St.Bernards 4-

8- Mid-Harbours Estate 8-

9- Bishop 9- Canilla House

1- Road Willis Terminus 1-

7- Commonwealth Park 7-

10- St. Bernards St.Hospital 10- Bernards

14- Willis Road WillisTerminus 14-

10- Sacred 10-Church Heart

13- Moorish Castle MoorishEstate Castle 13-

8- West Queensway Quay 8-

1 inbound Willis Road to Market PlaceRoad Willis Market 1 to inbound 1 outbound Market Place to Willis RoadMarketWillisto Place 1 outbound

Mon-Fri Sat Sun+PH

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Appendix C2

Route 2 Boarding Daily Average (Aug 2016) 500

400

300

200

100

0

9-Old Casino 9-Old

8- Rock Rock Hotel 8-

7- Elliots Way7-

2-Las Plameras 2-Las

13- North Gorge 13-

4- Opposite Opposite RNH 4-

3- Orange 3- Bastion

2- Europa Mosque 2-

10- NatWest Bank 10-

7- Shorthorn Estate 7-

16- Europa Mosque Europa 16-

5- CathedralSquare 5-

10-Shorthorn Estate 10-Shorthorn

11- Brympton Estate 11-

6- Referendum Gates 6-

11- Fish Steps Market 11-

8- Trafalgar Cemetery 8-

12 Notre Dame School 12

6- Mount TennisCourt 6-

15- St.Bernards ChurchSt.Bernards 15-

13- Referendum Referendum House 13-

4- British 4- Menorial War

3- Buena Buena Vista Barracks 3-

5- Garrison Gymnasium 5-

14- Buena Buena Vista Barrack 14-

12- Garrison Gym North Garrison Gym 12-

1- Europa Point EuropaPoint Terminus 1-

1- Market PlaceMarketTerminus 1-

2 inbound Europa Point inbound Europa to… 2

17- Europa Point EuropaPoint Terminus 17-

14- Market Place TerminusPlaceMarket 14-

2 outbound Market Place to…PlaceMarketoutbound 2 9- Convent Place Main Street MainPlaceConvent 9- Mon-Fri Sat Sun+PH

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data) Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Appendix C3

Route 3 Boarding Daily Average (Aug 2016) 250

200

150

100

50

0

5- GASA 5-

15- Gib5 15-

2- Rosia Plaza 2-

13- Old 13- Casino

12- RockHotel 12-

9- Kings Kings Wharf 9-

11- Elliots Elliots Way 11-

3- Ocean VillageOcean 3-

19- Referendum 19-

17- Las Palmeras 17-

7- Victoria Victoria House 7-

6- JumpersBuilding 6-

4- New House 4- Mole

9- Queensway Queensway Quay 9-

5- Cumberland 5- Road

14- Shorthorn Shorthorn Estate 14-

4- Albert Albert Risso House 4-

14- Varyll Estate Begg 14-

2- ConstitutionHouse 2-

8- Trafalgar Trafalgar Cemetery 8-

8-Mid-Harbour Estate 8-Mid-Harbour

7- Europort Building 8 Europort Building 7-

15- Schomburg 15- House

3- South Pavillion RoadSouth Pavillion 3-

18- Notre 18- Dame School

6- St. Bernards St. Hospital Bernards 6-

11- Mid-Harbours Mid-Harbours Estate 11-

12- Bishop Canilla Bishop House Canilla 12-

13- St. Bernards St. Hospital Bernards 13-

10- Queensway W Quay ) 10- (

16- South Pavillion Building South Pavillion 16-

10- Commonwealth Parade 10-

1- South 1- Barracks Terminus

16- Opposite Opposite Watergardens 16-

3 inbound inbound South to… 3 Barracks 3 outbound Referendum House… 3 1- Referendum Referendum House Terminus 1- Mon-Fri Sat Sun+PH

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Appendix C4

Route 4 Boarding Daily Average (Aug 2016) 120

100

80

60

40

20

0

14- Gib 5 14- 16- Gib 16-5

11- GSA GSA Pool 11- 13- GSA Pool 13-

6- &RidePark 6-

3- Catalan 3- Bay

2-Caleta Hotel2-Caleta

15- Waterport 15- Waterport 17-

27- Rosia Plaza 27-

9- Ocean Village 9-

29- Las PalmerasLas 29- 17- Las PalmerasLas 17-

18- Market Place 18- 16- Market 16-Place Market 10-Place

5- Victoria 5- House

11- Ocean Ocean Village 11-

8- Nat West BankWest Nat 8-

24- Williams 24-Way

1- Rosia Terminus 1-

25- New HarboursNew 25-

28- Rosia Rosia Terminus 28-

18- Orange 18-Bastion

21- Faulknor House 21-

22- Alameda Alameda House 22-

4- Jumpers Building 4-

9- Fish MarketFish Steps 9-

25- Black Strap BlackCove 25-Strap

2- New MoleParade 2-

3- Cumberland Road 3-

26- New Mole HouseMoleNew 26-

20- Cathedral Square Cathedral 20-

13- Varyll Begg EstateVaryll Begg 13- 15- Varyll Begg VaryllEstate 15-Begg

8- Constitution 8- House

6- Trafalgar Cemetery Trafalgar 6-

7- Referendum House 7-

5- TheresasSt. 5- Church

10- Albert Albert Risso 10- House Albert Risso 12- House

21- Referendum Gates 21-

20- Notre DameNotre School 20-

4- TerracesBeach 4- View

23-Eastern Beach South Beach 23-Eastern

12- St. Bernards St.Hospital 12- Bernards 14- St. Hospital 14- Bernards

1- Herbert MilesSir 1-

19- British WarBritish 19-Memorial

24- Jumpers Building Jumpers West Building 24-

22- St. Theresa Church South St.Church 22- Theresa

7- StreetConventMoain 7- Place

23- Governors Governors Meadow House 23- 4 inbound Sir Herbert Miles Road Rosia Herbert Miles to Sir 4 inbound

4 outbound Rosia to Sir Herbert Miles Road HerbertRosia MilesSirto 4 outbound Mon-Fri Sat Sun+PH

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Appendix C5

Route 7 Boarding Daily Average (Aug 2016) 60

50

40

30

20

10

0

12- Old Casino 12-

11- RockHotel 11-

10- Elliots Way 10-

9- Referendum 9-

4- NatWest 4- Bank

6- Orange Bastion 6-

1- MountAlvernia 1-

8- CathedralSquare 8-

5- Fish Steps 5- Market

2- Trafalgar Trafalgar Cemetery 2- 7- British 7- Memorial War Mon-Fri Sat Sun+PH 3- Convent PlaceMain3-Street

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data) Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Appendix C6

Route 8 Boarding Daily Average (Aug 2016) 250

200

150

100

50

0

4- Gib Gib 5 4-

13- GASA 13-

5- Waterport 5-

7- Park & RidePark & 7-

3- Caleta 3- Hotel

1- Both Worlds 1-

7- Las 7- Palmeras

6- Market PlaceMarket 6-

13- Both Worlds 13-

12- Wiliams Way 12-

10- Market PlaceMarket 10-

11- Ocean VillageOcean 11-

9- Faulknor House 9-

2- Black Strap Black cove Strap 2-

4- Catalan Road4- Bay

3- Varyll Estate Bebb 3-

15- Edinburgh House 15-

1- Reclaimation 1- Road

9- Constitution House 9-

8- Referendum Referendum House 8-

16- Reclamation Reclamation Road 16-

8- Notre Dame SchoolNotre Dame 8-

6- St.Church Theresas 6-

12- AlbertRissoHouse 12-

5- Beach ViewTerraces Beach 5-

2- St. Bernards St. Hospital Bernards 2-

11- Eastern SouthEastern Beach 11-

14- St. 14- HospitalBernards 10- St. Theresa St. Church South Theresa 10-

8 inbound Reclamation to Both Both Worlds inbound toReclamation 8 Mon-Fri Sat Sun 8 outbound Both Worlds to Reclamation outboundBoth to Worlds 8 Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Gibraltar STTP – Appendix C: Existing Bus Data Results (2016 data)

Appendix C7

Route 9 Boarding Daily Average (Aug 2016) 350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

16- Gib5 16-

13- GASA 13-

8- Nat WestNat 8-

11- Soth 11- Gate

17- Waterport 17-

12- Rosia Plaza 12-

2- Las 2- Palmeras

10- Market PlaceMarket 10-

5- Victoria Victoria House 5-

11- OceanVillage 11-

1- Rosia Terminus 1-

3- Orange Bastion 3-

10- New Harbours 10-

7- Alameda House 7-

13- Rosia Terminus 13-

4- JumpersBuilding 4-

2- New Mole NewHouse Mole 2-

5- Cathedral Square5-

9- Fish Market Fish Steps Market 9-

3- Cumberland 3- Road

6- Referendum Referendum Gates 6-

15- Varyll Begg Estate Varyll Begg 15-

6- Trafalgar Trafalgar Cemetery 6-

12- AlbertRissoHouse 12-

4- British Memorial War 4-

14- St. Bernards St. Hospital Bernards 14-

9- Jumpers BuildingWestJumpers 9-

1- Market Place TerminusPlaceMarket 1-

18- Market Place TerminusPlaceMarket 18-

7- Convent Place Main Street ConventMainPlace 7- 8- Governors Meadow Governors House Meadow 8-

9 inbound Market Place to Place inbound MarketRosia 9 Mon-Fri Sat Sun+PH 9 outbound RosiaPlace Market 9 to

Gibraltar Sustainable Traffic, Transport and Parking Plan

Appendix D – Survey Data Pedestrian Counts (Based on results obtained in 2013 through traffic and transport surveys)

November 2016

Site plan for : Site 1 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013 AM 0700 - 1000 IP 1000 - 1600 PM 1600 - 1900

N O R T H 6 All Day 1107 AM IP PM 110 676 321

1 All Day 5 All Day 2344 2251 AM IP PM AM IP PM 570 1367 407 550 1325 376

Corral Road

4 All Day 3268 2 All Day AM IP PM 1139 293 1724 1251 AM IP PM 161 689 289

3 All Day 2532 AM IP PM 751 1240 541 Site plan for : Site 2 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013 AM 0700 - 1000 IP 1000 - 1600 PM 1600 - 1900

N O R T H

St Annes Road

3 All Day 2 All Day 179 959 AM IP PM AM IP PM 13 106 60 4 All Day 177 629 153 274 AM IP PM 72 138 64

Glacis Road

5 All Day 6 All Day 531 409 1 All Day AM IP PM AM IP PM 829 71 328 132 83 227 99 AM IP PM 225 413 191 Site plan for : Site 3 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013

Line Wall Road Casemates Square N O R T H D All Day D All Day 0 0 AM IP PM AM IP PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 C All Day C All Day 0 0 AM IP PM AM IP PM Shopping Mall 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entrance Crutchetts Ramp D E All Day B All Day C 0 0 AM IP PM AM IP PM E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cooperage Lane B Lynchs Lane E All Day B All Day 0 0 AM IP PM AM IP PM 0 0 0 0 0 0

A A All Day A All Day 0 0 AM IP PM AM IP PM 0 0 0 0 0 0

KEY Main Street Origin ARM Destination ARM Site plan for : Site 4 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013

Corral Road 10 All Day 109 AM IP PM N O R T H 27 42 40 AM 0700 - 1000 IP 1000 - 1600 6 All Day PM 1600 - 1900 194 AM IP PM 3 All Day 60 88 46 5 All Day 275 153 AM IP PM 2 All Day AM IP PM 80 131 64 2915 1 All Day 47 87 19 AM IP PM 2754 887 1332 696 AM IP PM 705 1457 592

Glacis Road

Glacis Road Glacis Road Casemates Sq. Queensway Road

7 All Day 8 All Day 1818 1684 AM IP PM 4 All Day AM IP PM 538 797 483 300 549 618 517 AM IP PM 84 147 69 9 All Day 129 AM IP PM 33 59 37

Fish Market Road Site plan for : Site 5 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013 AM 0700 - 1000 IP 1000 - 1600

PM 1600 - 1900 Waterport Road N O R T H Waterport Road

1 All Day 2 All Day 1239 1060 AM IP PM AM IP PM 133 884 222 61 735 264

North Mole Road North Mole Road

North Mole Road North Mole Road

3 All Day 4 All Day 1055 1150 AM IP PM AM IP PM 191 560 304 79 663 408 Site plan for : Site 6 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013

Irish Town

N O R T H D All Day D All Day 207 177 AM IP PM AM IP PM 99 108 0 77 100 0 D

Cloister Ramp C A Market Lane

C All Day C All Day A All Day A All Day 74 99 149 101 AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 42 32 0 74 25 0 80 69 0 53 48 0 B B All Day B All Day 166 219 AM IP PM AM IP PM 87 79 0 104 115 0 Line Wall Road Irish Town Site plan for : Site 7 - Pedestrians Date : Site 7 - Pedestrians MainStreet N O R T H D All Day D All Day 1249 1335 AM IP PM AM IP PM 362 887 0 476 859 0 D A All Day 155 AM IP PM 63 92 0 1 All Day C All Day 0 82 AM IP PM AM IP PM 0 0 0 43 39 0 A Bishop Rapallo’s Ramp C 2 All Day C All Day 0 94 AM IP PM AM IP PM 0 0 0 37 57 0 B All Day 1357 A All Day AM IP PM 190 470 887 0 AM IP PM 84 106 0

B B All Day 1224 AM IP PM 341 883 0 BombHouse Lane MainStreet CannonLane Site plan for : Site 8 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013

C All Day C All Day 629 Main Street 660 AM IP PM AM IP PM N O R T H 49 580 0 68 592 0

C B All Day D All Day 227 139 AM IP PM AM IP PM 43 184 0 42 97 0

John Mackintosh Square B D City Mill Lane

B All Day A All Day A All Day D All Day 251 830 750 114 AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 36 215 0 102 728 0 78 672 0 30 84 0 A

Pitmans Alley Main Street Site plan for : Site 9 - Pedestrians

Date : Friday 31st May 2013 Main Main Street N O R T H D All Day D All Day 6203 6809 AM IP PM AM IP PM 679 4430 1094 749 4656 1404 D A All Day 646 C All Day AM IP PM 1984 127 394 125 AM IP PM 420 1157 407

C A Georges Lane Cathedral Square

C All Day A All Day 1662 878 AM IP PM AM IP PM 235 1077 350 149 521 208

B B All Day B All Day 5921 5973 AM IP PM AM IP PM

806 4164 951 669 4183 1121 Main Main Street Site plan for : Site 10 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013

N O R T H

Car Parks / Residential Access

3 All Day 1 All Day 46 14 All Day 13 All Day 44 12 All Day 11 All Day AM IP PM 38 81 AM IP PM 16 All Day 15 All Day 99 140 29 17 0 AM IP PM AM IP PM 39 5 0 31 36 AM IP PM AM IP PM 30 8 0 60 21 0 AM IP PM AM IP PM 64 35 0 89 51 0 16 15 0 11 25 0

Europort Road Europort Road Europort Road

10 All Day 9 All Day 8 All Day 7 All Day 6 All Day 5 All Day 146 118 65 134 86 215 AM IP PM AM IP PM 4 All Day AM IP PM AM IP PM 2 All Day AM IP PM AM IP PM 86 60 0 78 40 0 30 40 25 0 102 32 0 104 65 21 0 170 45 0 AM IP PM AM IP PM 9 21 0 84 20 0 Car Parks/Delivery Entrance AM 0700 - 1000 IP 1000 - 1600 PM 1600 - 1900

IP 1000 - 1600 PM 1600 - 1900 Site plan for : Site 11 Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013

N O R T H Place Convent All Day 135 5 AM IP PM All Day 26 86 23 3376 All Day All Day All Day 8 AM IP PM 3427 3837 3491 7 4 3 427 2299 650 AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 458 2167 802 477 2660 700 452 2224 815

Main Street Main Street

All Day All Day 259 295 2 1 AM IP PM AM IP PM 34 159 66 42 172 81 All Day AM 0700 - 1000 6 240 IP 1000 - 1600 AM IP PM PM 1600 - 1900 Site plan for : Site 12 - Pedestrians Date : Friday 31st May 2013

2 All Day N O R T H 1671 AM IP PM 308 965 398

8 All Day 304 AM IP PM Trafalgar Road 45 199 60 1 All Day 1481 AM IP PM 88 981 412

Main Street

Line Wall Road

3 All Day 420 4 All Day AM IP PM 527 51 175 194 AM IP PM 7 All Day 51 283 193 316 AM IP PM 6 All Day 60 213 43 105 AM IP PM 11 39 55

Line Wall Road 5 All Day 260 AM IP PM AM 0700 - 1000 22 129 109 IP 1000 - 1600 PM 1600 - 1900 Site plan for : 1 - Morrisons Roundabout Date : Wednesday 29th May 2013 4b All Day 560 AM IP PM 3b All Day AM0700 - 1000 84 278 198 750 IP 1000 - 1600 AM IP PM PM1600 - 1900 264 330 156

4a All Day * Ignored locations 1, 7 and 8 as pedestrians not visible 591 Europort Road (N) AM IP PM 3a All Day 67 300 224 601 AM IP PM 82 378 141

All Day 2b 833 AM IP PM 225 350 258

All Day 2a 784 9b All Day AM IP PM 9a All Day 559 2 76 426 282 590 AM IP PM AM IP PM 83 278 198 6b All Day 66 298 226 743 AM IP PM 267 331 145

Westside Road

6a All Day 602 All Day AM IP PM 10a All Day 10b 519 2 83 376 143 633 AM IP PM AM IP PM 57 259 203 277 227 129

Morrisons Access

5a All Day 205 AM IP PM Europort Road (S) 68 90 47

5b All Day 186 AM IP PM 16 105 65 Site plan for : 2 - Ragged Staff Roundabout Date : Thursday 30th May 2013 6b All Day 227 N O R T H AM IP PM 5b All Day 57 102 68 200 AM IP PM 6a All Day 58 97 45

220 Queensway AM IP PM Road (N) 43 100 68 5a All Day 268 AM IP PM 1a All Day 3a All Day 9a All Day 48 138 82 0 169 9b All Day 174 AM IP PM AM IP PM 154 AM IP PM 0 0 0 39 63 67 AM IP PM 55 82 56 31 76 47 1 1b All Day 3b All Day 1 170 AM IP PM AM IP PM 0 1 0 45 78 47

Queensway Quay 4 2 Ragged Staff Road 2a All Day 4a All Day 0 156 AM IP PM AM IP PM 0 0 0 33 73 50

10a All Day 3 2b All Day 4b All Day 10b All Day 375 0 133 203 AM IP PM 8b All Day AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 37 82 53 164 0 0 0 44 70 19 39 97 67 AM IP PM 75 68 21

7b All Day 83 AM IP PM 8a All Day 24 48 11 143 AM IP PM

Queensway 23 63 57 7a All Day Road (S) 59 AM IP PM 5 27 27 Site Plan for: 3 - Royal Bank of Scotland (3 Palms) Date: Tuesday 28th May 2013 11b All Day 2617 Winston Churchill Avenue AM IP PM 4a All Day 817 1444 356 1193 1a All Day 3a All Day AM IP PM 11 0 451 557 185 AM IP PM AM IP PM 1 6 4 602 1385 337

1b All Day 3b All Day 11a All Day 10 4b All Day 15 1292 1265 2073 AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 2 12 1 115 806 371 113 681 471 119 965 989 2a All Day 10a All Day 2336 1073 AM IP PM AM IP PM 581 1354 401 57 644 372

2b All Day 10b All Day 5 1306 2291 AM IP PM AM IP PM 151 829 326 796 1232 263

1

* 5 and 9 excluded as pedestrians not visible Line Wall Road Sortie Road 3

8a All Day 2 108 8b All Day AM IP PM 153 40 54 14 AM IP PM 7a All Day 19 73 61 3639 AM IP PM 6a All Day 1309 1560 770 2238 AM IP PM 586 1326 326 Corral Road 7b All Day 3040 AM IP PM 6b All Day 260 1436 1344 1178 AM IP PM 92 757 329 Site plan for : 4 - Regal House Junction Date : Wednesday 29th May 2013 1a All Day 1742 AM IP PM N O R T H 282 1081 379

Queensway (N) 1b All Day 1874 AM IP PM 10a All Day 369 1145 360 10b All Day 1735 1979 AM IP PM 2a All Day AM IP PM 277 1077 381 266 1 425 1207 347 AM IP PM 71 146 49

2b All Day 335 AM IP PM 9 Reclamation Road 47 213 75

9a All Day 222 7a All Day AM IP PM 7b All Day 2689 54 131 37 2547 AM IP PM AM IP PM 556 1544 589 9b All Day 562 1464 521 169 AM IP PM 27 108 34

* 3 and 4 not included as pedestrians not visible 2

6b All Day 230 8a All Day AM IP PM 8b All Day 576 33 134 63 655 AM IP PM AM IP PM 154 274 148 150 356 149

Queensway (S) 6a All Day 267 5b All Day AM IP PM 609 84 135 48 AM IP PM 140 324 145

5a All Day 532 AM IP PM 148 255 129 Site plan for : 6 - Sun Dial Roundabout Date : Tuesday 28th May 2013 A - Winston Churchill Avenue (n) 1 All Day 225 AM IP PM 49 87 89

5 All Day 2 All Day 429 2594 AM IP PM AM IP PM 83 219 127 425 1128 1041 8 All Day 3350 B- Devils Tower Road AM IP PM 924 1755 671

4 All Day 3 All Day 931 2585 AM IP PM AM IP PM 163 505 263 D- Bayside Road 426 1127 1032

7 All Day 6 All Day 9 All Day 137 2258 3299 AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 36 61 40 385 938 935 907 1748 644

C- Winston Churchill Avenue (s) Site plan for :7 - Trafalgar Interchange 1 Date : Thursday 30th May 2013 1a All Day 4a All Day 6b All Day 5b All Day 15 152 483 141 AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 1 12 2 45 60 47 99 217 167 22 79 40 N O R T H 1b All Day 4b All Day 29 203 6a All Day 5a All Day AM IP PM AM IP PM 478 203 8 14 7 7 145 51 AM IP PM AM IP PM 115 241 122 69 75 59 2a All Day 8a All Day 400 440 AM IP PM AM IP PM 122 170 108 40 326 74 (N) 8 2b All Day 8b All Day 389 346 Trafalgar AM IP PM AM IP PM Road 12 193 127 87 176 83 1 3a All Day 9a All Day 26 250 4 AM IP PM AM IP PM 9 0 7 19 26 143 81

3b All Day 9b All Day 43 258 AM IP PM AM IP PM 5 13 25 53 133 72

3

Boyd 2 Street 7a All Day 146 AM IP PM 25 82 39

7b All Day 189 AM IP PM 55 80 54 Europa Road (S)

9 All Day 508 AM IP PM 79 276 153 Site plan for : 8 - Trafalgar Interchange 2 Date : Thursday 30th May 2013

1q All Day 1306 AM IP PM 5a All Day 153 879 274 409 AM IP PM Main Street Trafalgar Road 1b All Day 92 223 35 1451 AM IP PM 1 228 803 420 6 5b All Day 2a All Day 575 1388 AM IP PM AM IP PM 74 346 155 160 949 279

2b All Day 3b All Day 1475 115 AM IP PM AM IP PM 234 819 422

To Ragged 2 3 91 21 Staff Gates 4q All Day 140 AM IP PM 3q All Day 21 84 35 0 4 AM IP PM 4b All Day 12 40 16 98 AM IP PM 11 56 31

6a All Day 1321 AM IP PM 158 891 272

6b All Day 1460 AM IP PM

To Trafalgar To Trafalgar 230 810 274 Exchange 3 Exchange 1

* 7 and 8 not included as pedestrians not visible Site plan for : 9 - Trafalgar Interchange 3 Date : Thursday 30th May 2013 6b All Day * Location 3 not included as pedestrians not visible 1362 1a 4a To Trafalgar AM IP PM All Day All Day Interchange 2 143 940 279 1506 2 AM IP PM AM IP PM 163 1057 286 0 1 1 6a All Day 1409 1b All Day 4b All Day AM IP PM 1480 24 203 794 412 AM IP PM AM IP PM 217 821 442 4 13 7 7b All Day 8b All Day 1349 7a All Day 1363 8a All Day 2a All Day 5a All Day AM IP PM 1397 AM IP PM 1388 1385 2 145 940 264 AM IP PM 150 950 263 AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 202 795 400 205 791 392 150 973 262 0 1 1

2b All Day 5b All Day 2 1462 25 AM IP PM AM IP PM 10b All Day Boyd Street 207 816 439 4 14 7 755 AM IP PM 1 171 366 218

10a All Day 9b All Day 982 5 4 1632 9a All Day AM IP PM AM IP PM 1461 212 503 267 184 944 504 AM IP PM 203 968 290

Red Sands Rosia Road Road Site plan for : 11 - Gardiner's Rd / Europa Rd Junction Date : Thursday 30th May 2013

7 All Day 9 All Day 237 160 N O R T H AM IP PM AM IP PM 43 132 62 37 73 50

C- Europa Road (n) D- Gardiner's Road (n) 8 All Day 6 All Day 26 263 AM IP PM AM IP PM 8 7 11 65 111 155

4 All Day 3 All Day 243 29 AM IP PM AM IP PM 51 125 67 9 8 12

1 All Day 45 AM IP PM 2 All Day 12 22 11 65 AM IP PM 11 42 12

A- Gardiner's Road B- Europa Road (s) (s)

5 All Day 114 AM IP PM 34 51 29 Site plan for : 12 - Casemates Hill Roundabout Date : Tuesday 28th May 2013

8 All Day 3 All Day 1 All Day 5 All Day 254 326 38 181 AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM AM IP PM 97 115 42 101 179 46 6 22 10 58 86 37 N O R T H

C- Line Wall Road (s) A -Line Wall Road (n)

4 All Day 986 2 All Day AM IP PM 579 184 574 228 AM IP PM 104 335 140

6 All Day 987 AM IP PM 124 597 266 7 All Day B- Casemates 496 Square AM IP PM 97 303 96 Site plan for : 13 - Castle Road & Date : Wednesday 29th May 2013 7 All Day 5 All Day 551 487 AM IP PM AM IP PM 78 301 172 141 255 91 N O R T H

B- Castle Road A -Prince Edward's Road (n)

6 All Day 1 All Day 249 276 AM IP PM AM IP PM 58 118 73 41 136 99

2 All Day 4 All Day 177 473 AM IP PM AM IP PM 93 58 26 87 213 173

3 All Day 165 AM IP PM 43 72 50

D- Prince 9 All Day Edward's Road C- Flat Bastion 231 (s) Road AM IP PM 61 103 67

10 All Day 118 8 All Day AM IP PM 329 28 54 36 AM IP PM 60 150 119 Site plan for : 14 - Cathedral Square Date : Wednesday 29th May 2013

5 All Day 2 All Day 2827 1564 AM IP PM AM IP PM 529 1516 782 302 844 418

A- Line Wall Road (n) 3 All Day 753 1 All Day B- To Bomb AM IP PM 2700 House Lane 128 482 143 AM IP PM 541 1409 750

C- Cathedral 9 All Day Square 2807 AM IP PM 490 1521 796 6 All Day 433 AM IP PM 4 All Day 85 233 115 137 AM IP PM 25 73 39

7 All Day 102 8 All Day AM IP PM 1307 16 70 22 AM IP PM 232 825 250

C- Cathedral Square

10 All Day 991 D- Secretary's Lane AM IP PM 193 635 163 E- Line Wall Road (s)

11 All Day 12 All Day 317 416 AM IP PM AM IP PM 48 195 74 60 268 88 Site plan for : 15 - City Hall / Line Wall Road Date : Wednesday 29th May 2013 A- Line Wall Road (n) 4a & 4b All Day 1076 N O R T H AM IP PM 157 678 241

2a & 2b All Day 127 AM IP PM 32 55 40 6a & 6b All Day 194 1a & 1b All Day AM IP PM 7350 54 83 57 AM IP PM 1360 3669 2321

B- City Hall

3a & 3b All Day 243 5a & 5b All Day AM IP PM 7599 Notes: 75 113 55 AM IP PM Totals for flows on stick diagram are combined directions (i.e. 1 = 1a + 1b) 1141 4005 2453

All Day 8a & 8b All Day 765 3648 7a & 7b AM IP PM AM IP PM 89 388 288 807 2225 616

C- Line Wall Road Site plan for : 16 - Evacuation Roundabout Date : Tuesday 28th May 2013

N O R T H

5 All Day 501 AM IP PM A- North Mole 109 774 478 Road (n) 1 All Day 1868 AM IP PM 472 824 572

2 All Day 8 All Day 121 7 All Day 1774 AM IP PM 2194 AM IP PM 25 82 14 AM IP PM 327 995 452 593 1099 502

D- North Mole B- North Mole Road Road

9 All Day 684 AM IP PM 148 346 190

4 All Day 6 All Day 1652 569 AM IP PM AM IP PM 400 774 478 100 322 147

C- Europort Road

3 All Day 67 AM IP PM 16 33 18 Site plan for : 17 - Coaling Island Roundabout Date : Wednesday 29th May 2013

A- Bishop Caruana Road N O R T H

1 All Day 529 AM IP PM 183 266 80

B- Queensway Road (n)

D- Dockyards Zone

5 All Day 1559 AM IP PM 2 All Day 411 693 455 158 AM IP PM 34 105 37

3 All Day 360 AM IP PM 48 175 137 C- Queensway Road (s) 4 All Day 664 AM IP PM 159 313 192