DOCSLIB.ORG

160805 FINAL Coal Dust Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
160805 FINAL Coal Dust Report Final Report on the Independent Review of Rail Coal Dust Emissions Management Practices in the NSW Coal Chain NSW Chief Scientist & Engineer August 2016 http://www.chiefscientist.nsw.gov.au/reports/review-of-rail-coal-dust-emissions 5 August 2016 The Hon. Mark Speakman SC MP Minister for the Environment Minister for Heritage Assistant Minister for Planning 52 Martin Place SYDNEY NSW 2000 Dear Minister, Final Report – Independent Review of Rail Coal Dust Emissions Management Practices in the NSW Coal Chain In September 2015 you requested that I undertake a review of coal dust emissions management practices in the NSW coal chain. I now submit the final report of that Review. This report presents the Review’s finding and recommendations. As you would be aware from the Initial Report provided in November 2015, there remains uncertainty about air quality within and near the rail corridor. This Report recommends a path forward to address these uncertainties, which draws on consultations with the community, industry, government and researchers, and is informed by an expert workshop convened for this purpose. Released with this report are two expert papers commissioned about technological advances for sampling and monitoring air emissions from the coal chain in the rail corridor. In presenting this final report I would like to acknowledge the assistance of many people – in particular industry and community members who took the time to explain their initiatives and concerns, government colleagues who provided technical advice and the experts who made an important contribution towards addressing the issues raised. Yours sincerely, Mary O’Kane Chief Scientist & Engineer Chief Scientist and Engineer GPO Box 5477, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia | Tel +61 2 9338 6786 www.chiefscientist.nsw.gov.au EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In September 2015 the Minister for the Environment asked the Chief Scientist & Engineer to conduct an independent review of rail coal dust emissions management practices in the NSW Coal Chain (the Review). The Review is part of the Government’s response to the NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into the performance of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA). Community members and groups expressed concerns to the Legislative Council Inquiry and other reviews about the environmental and human health impacts of dust and particle emissions associated with the NSW coal supply chain, particularly in the Hunter region. These concerns in part relate to dust and diesel emissions from coal trains that connect the region’s mines to the Port of Newcastle and the effectiveness of current monitoring and management practices. The Review scoped the scale and nature of the issues through consultations with community, industry stakeholders, EPA staff, and discipline experts, together with a review of available literature. This included studies undertaken locally and internationally to identify the sources of coal dust and emissions in the rail corridor, possible mitigation strategies and analyses of gaps in our knowledge and understanding. It became evident to the Review that a substantial set of activities has been undertaken over a number of years in the Hunter rail corridor both to measure and to reduce dust and particulates. However, there are no existing studies or sets of studies available to date that can definitively determine if there is a problem associated with dust in the rail corridor. The available studies provide partial information about specific issues. We do know that the ambient air quality of the Hunter Valley region is well measured and monitored. It compares well with similar regions in Australia and overseas, and mostly meets national goals of the National Environment Protection Measures (NEPM) system, including allowable exceedances. Ambient air quality is generally within the 24-hour average PM 2.5 and PM 10 standards, but occasionally particle levels spike and exceed standards because of industrial and domestic activities, proximity to the ocean (sea salt), bushfires or seasonal weather patterns. However, we know much less about localised air quality, in and near the rail corridor. Current studies suggest that an average of 10% of the deposited dust found in or near the rail corridor is attributable to coal, but much more information is needed. There is a general consensus from the examined studies that dust levels increase when some loaded and unloaded coal and freight trains pass through the corridor; but less well understood is the composition of the dust, its source, quantity, concentration, and pattern and distance of dispersal. Given the known health impacts of particulate matter, more precision is required about localised air quality in the rail corridor, and the likelihood of its impacting people living and working near the corridor. The EPA is the main regulator ensuring that operators in the coal chain minimise air pollution, including cost dust emissions. Apart from its regulatory and monitoring role, the EPA has been active in conducting or initiating studies to understand pollution impacts in and near the rail corridor, and in encouraging industry to undertake studies to understand coal train impacts. Given the insufficient knowledge and data about the amount and distribution of coal dust emissions in the rail corridor, it is not possible to recommend at this stage any additional mitigation measures. This is because there are no reference points against which the iv effectiveness of the mitigation can be assessed. In addition, without data, no meaningful cost/benefit analysis of the economic, environmental or health impacts of any proposed mitigating measures can be undertaken. That does not mean that current mitigation strategies should be reduced. The Review recommends that the mitigation strategies currently employed be continued, and encourages the adoption of new strategies as information becomes available to enable their effectiveness and net benefit to be assessed. The lack of knowledge and data is a concern. The Review’s main recommendations focus on addressing the gaps in this knowledge. A workshop of experts convened by the Review proposed a staged approach to gathering the most essential data required to understand coal dust impacts in the rail corridor, working through questions sequentially and using a mix of desktop modelling and in-field measurements. This could be used as the basis for a pilot study which should be designed and implemented for the rail corridor to capture more detailed information and data on particulate levels and profiles within and near the corridor, and whether there are any increases in health risks for people living there. The Review notes that methodologies can be adapted from international studies on other linear sources, such as roads and freeways. Lessons can also be learned from the ‘peak’ site approach taken in New Zealand to measuring air quality, and, accordingly, it is proposed that an analysis of potential hotspots be undertaken to inform decisions about the placement of monitors for the pilot study. Monitoring technology is rapidly advancing and becoming cheaper, smarter and more versatile. A combination of new technologies built to appropriate quality standards has considerable potential for application in the rail corridor. The Review suggests that NSW needs to adopt a two-pronged approach to air quality monitoring. One prong would maintain the State’s current focus on background ambient air quality by way of its well-structured network of NEPM monitors. The second prong would be a more systematic focus on spatial and temporal distribution of air pollutants associated with pollutant-generating sources extending the approach of local monitoring required of some licensed industry activities; and broadening this to other locations and pollution sources which may or may not be subject to licenses. In addition, the data and models derived from the data should be made publicly available in close to real time. An initial focus would be on particulates from local sources in the coal chain (including moving sources such as trains). v FINDING & RECOMMENDATIONS Finding The Review is unable to make a formal determination on specific mitigation techniques because there is not enough known about the amount and distribution of particulates in the rail corridor and thus no reference point against which to assess mitigation effectiveness. That said, there is a significant body of literature pointing to moisture as a major factor in reducing dust mobilisation at various components of the coal chain (including for coal trains). Recommendations Recommendation 1 It is recommended that NSW adopt a dual approach to ensuring air quality through: i. the current focus on background ambient air quality by way of a well-structured network of standardised (including NEPM) monitors ii. a systematic focus on spatial and temporal distribution of air pollutants attributable to specific sources, with an initial focus on particulates from local, though possibly moving, sources (e.g. trains) in the coal chain. This will require banks of dedicated monitors, that form separate networks to the NEPM network, the data from which will allow real-time monitoring and will provide input for new specific local air quality models of pollution from source to where air quality is at background levels. The data for both foci must be of high quality and publicly available. Recommendation 2 It is recommended that a pilot study be designed and implemented for the rail corridor that would capture more detailed information and data on whether there is a statistically significant increase in particulate levels within the corridor, how far out from the corridor the particulate profile extends, and whether this would result in an unacceptable increased health risk for people living in the vicinity of the corridor. In order to allow for worst cases, it is suggested that an initial analysis of potential hotspots be undertaken to inform decisions about the placement of the banks of monitors for the pilot. Recommendation 3 It is recommended that following the pilot study, a process of monitoring pollutant sources at close range be rolled out.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FINAL NCIG SEE Report April 2020
    Coal Export Terminal Optimisation Statement of Environmental Effects Project Approval (06_0009) Modification Report APRIL 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 5 Engagement 22 1.1 Background 1 5.1 Consultation 22 1.1.1 NCIG Development History 1 5.1.1 Department Of Planning, Industry and Environment 22 1.1.2 Description of Approved Operations 4 5.1.2 Regulatory Agencies and Local Council 22 1.1.3 Optimisation Initiatives Implemented at the NCIG CET 6 5.1.3 Other Key Stakeholders 22 1.2 Modification Overview 8 5.1.4 Public Consultation 23 1.3 Interactions with other Projects 9 5.2 Key Comments and Concerns 23 1.4 Structure of this Modification Report 9 6 Assessment Of Impacts 25 6.1 Noise 25 2 Description Of The Modification 10 6.1.1 Methodology 25 2.1 Train Movements 10 6.1.2 Background 25 2.2 Ships 10 6.1.3 Applicable Criteria 27 2.3 Water Management 10 6.1.4 Impact Assessment Review 29 6.2 Air Quality 32 3 Strategic Context 12 6.2.1 Methodology 32 3.1 Optimisation Of Existing Infrastructure 12 6.2.2 Background 32 3.2 Benefits For NCIG’s Customers 12 6.2.3 Impact Assessment Review 35 3.3 Importance to Port of Newcastle 13 6.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 36 3.4 Hunter Valley Coal Chain Efficiency 14 6.3.1 Assessment of Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions 36 4 Statutory Context 15 6.3.2 International, National and State Policies and Programs Regarding Greenhouse 4.1 Environmental Planning and Gas Emissions 37 Assessment Act, 1979 15 6.3.3 NCIG Greenhouse Gas Mitigation 4.1.1 EP&A Act Objects 16 Measures 38 4.2 Environmental Planning Instruments 17 4.2.1 State Environmental Planning Policy 7 Evaluation Of Merits 39 (Three Ports) 2013 17 7.1 Stakeholder Engagement Overview 39 4.2.2 State Environmental Planning Policy 7.2 Consolidated Summary of Assessment (Coastal Management) 2018 19 of Impacts 39 4.2.3 State Environmental Planning Policy No.
    [Show full text]
  • Derailment and Collision Between Coal Trains Ravenan (25Km from Muswellbrook), New South Wales, on 26 September 2018
    Derailment and collision between coal trains Ravenan (25km from Muswellbrook), New South Wales, on 26 September 2018 ATSB Transport Safety Report Rail Occurrence Investigation (Defined) RO-2018-017 Final – 18 December 2020 Cover photo: Source ARTC This investigation was conducted under the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 (Commonwealth) by the Office of Transport Safety Investigations (NSW) on behalf of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau in accordance with the Collaboration Agreement Released in accordance with section 26 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 2463 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Email: [email protected] Website: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Freight and Ports Plan 2018-2023
    NSW Freight and Ports Plan 2018-2023 September 2018 Contents Message from the Ministers 4 Executive Summary – A Plan For Action 2018-2023 6 What the Plan will achieve over the next five years 6 Objective 1: Economic growth 7 Objective 2: Efficiency, connectivity and access 8 Objective 3: Capacity 9 Objective 4: Safety 10 Objective 5: Sustainability 11 Part 1 – Introduction 13 About this Plan 13 Part 2 – Context: The State Of Freight 17 About this chapter 17 The NSW freight and ports sector at glance 17 Greater Sydney production and freight movements 26 The Greater Sydney freight network 28 Regional NSW production and freight movements 36 The regional freight network 39 Part 3 – How We Will Respond To Challenges And Opportunities 45 About this chapter 45 The five objectives 45 Objective 1: Economic growth 47 Objective 2: Efficiency, connectivity and access 51 Objective 3: Capacity 62 Objective 4: Safety 70 Objective 5: Sustainability 73 Part 4 - Implementation Plan 77 Appendix 78 Message from the Ministers The freight industry is the lifeblood of the • Deliver more than $5 billion in committed NSW economy – worth $66 billion to our key infrastructure projects for freight in State economy. From big businesses to NSW. These include $543 million towards farmers, retailers to consumers, we all rely Fixing Country Roads, $400 million on our goods getting to us in a safe and towards Fixing Country Rail, $15 million efficient manner. towards the Fixing Country Rail pilot, $21.5 million towards the Main West rail line, The NSW Freight and Ports Strategy $500 million towards the Sydney Airport released in 2013 was the first long-term Road upgrade, $400 million towards Port freight vision to be produced for NSW, Botany Rail Line duplication, $1171 million which drove targeted investment in both towards the Coffs Harbour Bypass and metropolitan and regional transport $2.2-$2.6 billion towards Sydney Gateway.
    [Show full text]
  • Redistribution of New South Wales Into Electoral Divisions FEBRUARY 2016
    Redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions FEBRUARY 2016 Report of the augmented Electoral Commission for New South Wales Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Feedback and enquiries Feedback on this report is welcome and should be directed to the contact officer. Contact officer National Redistributions Manager Roll Management Branch Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 Locked Bag 4007 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: 02 6271 4411 Fax: 02 6215 9999 Email: [email protected] AEC website www.aec.gov.au Accessible services Visit the AEC website for telephone interpreter services in 18 languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS): – TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 – Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 – Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 ISBN: 978-1-921427-44-2 © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 © State of New South Wales 2016 The report should be cited as augmented Electoral Commission for New South Wales, Redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions. 15_0526 The augmented Electoral Commission for New South Wales (the augmented Electoral Commission) has undertaken a redistribution of New South Wales. In developing and considering the impacts of the redistribution, the augmented Electoral Commission has satisfied itself that the electoral divisions comply with the requirements of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Electoral Act). The augmented Electoral Commission commends its redistribution for New South Wales. This report is prepared to fulfil the requirements of section 74 of the Electoral Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Project SHEET Newcastle, Australia NCIG Berths 8 and 9 Dredging Project
    PROJECT SHEET NEWCASTLE, AUSTRALIA NCIG BErths 8 AND 9 DREDGING PROJECT INTRODUCTION FEaturES For 200 years the Port of Newcastle has been Client Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group, Australia’s premier coal export harbour. Of the 95 with Aurecon Hatch as EPCM Contractor Mtpa of various commodities such as steel, aluminum, minerals and so forth exported from Location Newcastle, Australia Newcastle in 2008-2009, 90.5 Mtpa were Period November 2007 - May 2010 attributable to coal. Average annual growth rate of coal exports from 1990 to 2006 was 6.1%. Contractor Boskalis Dredeco Joint Venture This constant increase has caused a spike in ships queuing to enter the harbour to be loaded. To increase capacity and avoid these traffic jams, a decision was made to develop a new coal stockpile area and construct a third coal terminal. In April 2007 the Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group (NCIG) received approval from the New South Wales Government to proceed. NCIG has a 35-year lease on the 136-hectare site on Kooragang Island and construction on Stage One of the facilities with capacity to load 30Mtpa is almost completed. The shiploading facilities have been built to the west of the existing Kooragang A shiploaders, with the new stockyards and rail facilities to the south-west of the Kooragang Coal A Location map Terminal. The port is located at the mouth of the B The cabins of the backhoes are equipped with Hunter River which, as part of the project, was state-of-the-art technology C deepened to allow ships to reach the new berths.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping Data Generation for the Hunter Valley Coal Chain∗
    Shipping Data Generation for the Hunter Valley Coal Chain∗ Natashia Boland, Martin Savelsbergh, and Hamish Waterer School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia Abstract Strategic capacity planning is a core activity for the Hunter Valley Coal Chain Coordinator as demand for coal is expected to double in the next decade. Optimization and simulation models are used to suggest and evaluate infrastructure expansions and operating policy changes. These models require input data in the form of shipping stems, which are arrival streams of ships at the port, together with their cargo types and composition. Creating shipping stems that accurately represent future demand scenarios has been a time-consuming and daunting challenge. We describe a multi-phase optimization-based framework that facilitates and enhances this process, and which has become an integral part of the work flow. The framework embeds sampling to allow for the generation of multiple shipping stems for a single demand scenario, employs targets, and desirable and permissable ranges to specify and control the characteristics of the shipping stems, and uses integer programming in a hierarchical fashion to generate a shipping stem that best meets the set goals. 1 Introduction The Hunter Valley Coal Chain (HVCC) refers to the inland portion of the coal export supply chain in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia. The HVCC essentially follows the path of the Hunter River traveling south-east from the mining areas in the Hunter Valley to Newcastle. The Port of Newcastle is the world's largest coal export port. In 2008 port throughput was around 92 million tonnes, or more than 10 percent of the world's total trade in coal.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional and Interstate Transport Summary 10.1 Snapshot • Regional and Interstate Transport Infrastructure • a Number of Major Road Programs Are Underway
    10.0 Regional and interstate transport Summary 10.1 Snapshot • Regional and interstate transport infrastructure • A number of major road programs are underway. • Long distances, low population densities and the supports the economy and quality of life of These include upgrades to the Pacific Highway nature of regional employment means the demands NSW by allowing people to access employment and Princes Highway. Getting the best value for placed by passengers on the transport networks opportunities, connecting regional communities these major investments is essential. Infrastructure of Regional NSW are very different to those of and supporting freight movements. NSW is concerned that cost estimates for these metropolitan NSW. programs appear very high. • Regional NSW has extensive and well–developed • The road network is the dominant mode for regional regional road and rail networks connecting • Unlocking the key constraints along the road and passenger travel. Over 90 percent of the 7.5 million population and employment centres across rail networks that limit freight movements are likely journeys made each day are by car1. the state. In recent years, the NSW State and to have some of the highest economic benefits in Commonwealth Governments have undertaken the regions. This includes upgrading understrength • There is limited usage of regional and interstate public major investment to improve the quality and road bridges, providing rail passing loops and transport. Regional train services carry less than capacity of these networks. ensuring roads and rail lines are well-maintained 6,000 passengers a day. Regional bus and coach and effectively managed. services transport around almost three times as • The road network is the backbone of regional many, approximately 15,000 passengers a day2.
    [Show full text]
  • INSTITUTE of TRANSPORT and LOGISTICS STUDIES WORKING
    WORKING PAPER ITLS‐WP‐17‐06 Assessment of the Hunter Valley Coal Export Supply Chain By Natashia Boland1, Mohsen Reisi2 and Martin Savelsbergh3 1 & 3 H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Tech, USA 2 The University of Sydney, Australia March 2017 INSTITUTE of TRANSPORT and LOGISTICS STUDIES The Australian Key Centre in Transport and Logistics Management The University of Sydney Established under the Australian Research Council’s Key Centre Program. NUMBER: Working Paper ITLS-WP-17-06 TITLE: Assessment of the Hunter Valley Coal Export Supply Chain We develop a decision support tool that assesses the throughput ABSTRACT: of a coal export supply chain for a given level of demand. The tool can be used to rapidly evaluate a number of infrastructures for several future demand scenarios in order to identify a few that should be investigated more thoroughly using a detailed simulation model. To make the natural model computationally tractable, we exploit problem structure to reduce the model size, and we employ aggregation as well as disaggregation to strengthen the structure of model. We use the tool in a computational study in which we analyze system performance for different levels of demand to identify potential bottlenecks. KEY WORDS: Supply Chain Optimisation _ Integer Programming _ Coal Export AUTHORS: Boland, Reisi and Savelsbergh CONTACT: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS STUDIES (H73) The Australian Key Centre in Transport and Logistics Management The University of Sydney NSW 2006 Australia Telephone: +612 9114 1824 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://sydney.edu.au/business/itls DATE: March 2017 1 Assessment of the Hunter Valley Coal Export Supply Chain 1 Introduction Since the global population is growing, and living standards are improving in developing countries, the demand for energy is increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Capability Across the Coal Supply Chain
    AUSTRALIAN CAPABILITY ACROSS THE COAL SUPPLY CHAIN SAMPLE VISIT PROGRAM AUSTRALIA’S KEY COAL MINING REGIONS Visiting major regional sites is an excellent way to gain a first-hand understanding of Australia’s coal supply chain capabilities. Austrade can assist in creating a visit program tailored to specific areas of interest and connect interested companies with METS suppliers and partners. Visit programs have been created to illustrate the any of the listed organisations. All site visits must breadth of expertise available in two key mining be arranged in advance by mutual agreement. regions in Australia: the Hunter Valley in NSW and the Bowen Basin in Queensland. Please note, Please contact your Austrade representative these sample visit programs are examples only for assistance and to arrange visits and and should not be interpreted as invitations to visit meetings with these organisations. Sample visit program – Australia’s key coal mining regions 1 HUNTER VALLEY, NSW SAMPLE VISIT PROGRAM Day & Location Focus Website DAY 1 Port of Newcastle portofnewcastle.com.au Newcastle Port tour by boat The Port of Newcastle is the largest port on the east coast of Australia and a leading global coal export port. Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group (NCIG) ncig.com.au Port facility automation NCIG operates a coal export terminal within the Port of Newcastle, providing 66MTpa of export capacity. It is an advanced and innovative plant with highly automated systems and processes. The Hunter Valley Coal Chain Coordinator (HVCCC) hvccc.com.au Automation and control – coal export operation HVCCC is an automated control centre managing all pit-to-port coal export logistics in the Hunter region.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects and Challenges for the Hunter Region a Strategic Economic Study
    Prospects and challenges for the Hunter region A strategic economic study Regional Development Australia Hunter March 2013 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. © 2013 Deloitte Access Economics Pty Ltd Prospects and challenges for the Hunter region Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Part I: The current and future shape of the Hunter economy .................................................... 3 2 The Hunter economy in 2012 .......................................................................................... 4 2.2 Population and demographics ........................................................................................... 5 2.3 Workforce and employment ............................................................................................. 8 2.4 Industrial composition .................................................................................................... 11 3 Longer term factors and implications ............................................................................ 13 3.1 New patterns in the global economy ............................................................................... 13 3.2 Demographic change ...................................................................................................... 19
    [Show full text]
  • 0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN
    0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Redistribution of the New South Wales Into Electoral Divisions
    Proposed redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions OCTOBER 2015 Report of the Redistribution Committee for New South Wales Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Feedback and enquiries Feedback on this report is welcome and should be directed to the contact officer. Contact officer National Redistributions Manager Roll Management Branch Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 PO Box 6172 Kingston ACT 2604 Telephone: 02 6271 4411 Fax: 02 6215 9999 Email: [email protected] AEC website www.aec.gov.au Accessible services Visit the AEC website for telephone interpreter services in 18 languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS): – TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 – Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 – Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 ISBN: 978-1-921427-38-1 © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 © State of New South Wales 2015 The report should be cited as Redistribution Committee for the New South Wales, Proposed redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions. 15_0526 The Redistribution Committee for New South Wales (the Committee) has completed its proposed redistribution of New South Wales into 47 electoral divisions. In developing and considering the impacts of the redistribution proposal, the Committee has satisfied itself that the proposed boundaries meet the requirements of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Electoral Act). The Committee unanimously agreed on the boundaries and names of the proposed electoral divisions, and recommends its redistribution proposal for New South Wales.
    [Show full text]