Reserved Seats, Ethnic Constituencies, and Minority
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ASU Digital Repository “Stand For” and Deliver? Reserved Seats, Ethnic Constituencies, and Minority Representation in Colombia by Jean Paul Crissien A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved August 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Miki Kittilson, Chair Magda Hinojosa Michael Mitchell ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2015 ABSTRACT This project is a comparative exploration of the connection between descriptive representation and the substantive and symbolic representation of ethnic minorities: do Afro and indigenous representatives effectively “stand for” group members by introducing identity and empowering descriptive constituents? Featuring reserved seats for both minority groups, Colombia is an ideal case. In combination, the institutional design of reserved seats and the tradition of mestizaje and racial democracy add complexity to analyzing these populations. Consequently, in order to assess minority representation this work adds to extant representational theory by taking into account the crystallization of minority constituencies across elections. I use quantitative and qualitative data to comparatively assess the use of reserved seats for integrating minority identity to the deliberative process and measuring empowerment impacts for minority-majority municipalities. This data includes an original dataset of electoral outcomes across seven cycles (1990-2010) and transcripts of congressional plenaries spanning three legislative periods (2002-2014). I take into account constituency dynamics identifying the concentration and geographical sources of votes in minority districts. These outcomes translate to expectations of representative behavior, hinging on the theoretical belief that constituency dynamics act as signals of legislator accountability to minority constituents. This dissertation is located at the intersection of the comparative politics literature on minority quotas and representation, on one hand, and ethno-racial minority politics in Latin America, on the other. I find that ongoing electoral reforms have impacted constituency outcomes in post-reform cycles. More importantly, I observe that reserved i representatives from both groups have integrated identity into deliberative processes often, but that only in the case of indigenous representation has the use of identity in plenaries been responsive to constituency variables. In addition, empowerment effects are identified in indigenous-majority communities that have strong linkages to minority districts, while the same empowerment cannot be conclusively identified in Afro- majority communities. ii Para mi querida mamá, quién desde mi infancia siempre me ha hecho la compañía. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In writing this dissertation, I teetered between extremes, one hour needing sheer confinement and the next crying for conversational commiseration—all separated by desperate pleas for assistance. Between mentors, colleagues, and friends, I have been fortunate enough to find an enviable balance between various poles: distance and proximity; solitude and companionship; kind words and vituperation; tacit approval and loquacious rejection; independence and support. For this, I am eternally grateful to the collective fingerprint found on the corner of every page. I would spend another five years (six? let’s say five) thanking everyone that had a hand in this and cannot possibly give all of you specific mention. For this last part, I am truly sorry. My deepest gratitude goes out to the members of my committee. I have stolen them away from loving families and forced them to read chapters during long flights and on vacation. My chair, Miki Kittilson, has shown unending patience, diligence, and compassion throughout. From her, I never read or heard a criticism that was not appropriately packaged, each judgement prompting sincere reflection and forward movement—no small feat when guiding an intransigent mind. Office visits with Michael Mitchell were unpredictable and his words persuasive, a wonderful combination for keeping me on my toes. Nobody did more to help me see the big picture of this project and make me realize that I needed to do “better than my best.” I cannot begin to show my unending gratitude for all that Magda Hinojosa has done for me. At this young stage of my career, Magda has done more for my professional advancement than any single professor with whom I have interacted. Between taking me on as a research assistant, steadfast support in the job market, and pushing this project to completion, I can honestly iv say that I have two massive debt accounts at the end of this process—Perkins Loans and MH. My biggest lament is that I must instantly apologize to each of these kind people for continuing to ask for their help in the future. At Arizona State University, I would like to thank the School of Politics and Global Studies and Office of Graduate Education for funding the entirety of my doctoral studies. SPAGS should also be credited with providing funds that supporting a brief stint of field research in Bogotá and Cali, Colombia, during which I acquired the data that made these analyses possible. I also owe a debt to the Graduate and Professional Students Association of ASU, which gave me a wonderful opportunity to serve the institution and partially funded every conference trip I was fortunate enough to attend. I would also like to thank so many wonderful people at Middle Tennessee State University. Most of all, thank you to the Department of Academic Affairs and the Department of Political Science and International Relations. My completion fellowship at MTSU put me in position to finish this work. Individually, I would like to thank the Vice Provost of Academic Affairs, Dr. John Omachonu, and his remarkable Coordinator of Academic Affairs, Janice Lewis, who processes claims so efficiently that I am convinced she can single-handedly streamline the Affordable Care Act. My sincerest gratitude to the chair of the Political Science department, Stephen Morris, who supported my completion of this project and my job prospects from day one. Not to be forgotten are the perfect strangers. A combined thank you to Netflix, the Yellow Tail vintners, and Ikea, the holy triumvirate that sponsored my much needed breaks. And YES, Netflix—I am still watching. Finally, a big thanks to the República de Colombia, whose historical oppression of minorities made all of this possible. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………..…….viii LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. xii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 Normative and Empirical Literature on Minority Quotas .........................................8 Ethnicity, Race, and Exclusion in Latin America ...................................................11 Institutional Engineering in Reformatory Colombia ..............................................18 Methodological Notes and Organization of the Study ............................................23 2: AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK OF MINORITY REPRESENTATION ..............30 Representing Newly Recognized Minority Groups ...............................................32 An Adjusted Analytical Framework of Representation .........................................35 Concluding Remarks ..............................................................................................46 3: MINORITY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS IN PRACTICE (1991-2010) .........................48 District Design and Systemic Reform....................................................................51 Data and Procedures ..............................................................................................61 Data Analysis .........................................................................................................67 vi CHAPTER Page Concluding Remarks ...........................................................................................81 4: MINORITY PRESENCE, CONGRESSIONAL DISCOURSE, AND IDENTITY REPRESENTATION ......………………………………………………………………...84 Data and Procedures ..........................................................................................93 Data Analysis .....................................................................................................98 Concluding Remarks………………………………………………………….115 5: MINORITY DISTRICTS AND EMPOWERMENT ...................................................119 Data, Measures, and Procedures ......................................................................126 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................131 Concluding Remarks ........................................................................................138 6: CONCLUSION ...........................................................................................................143 Recap of the Study and Summary of Findings ................................................144 Revisiting Causality .........................................................................................146 Shortcomings and Future Research