TNP Geology and Ecology Enhanced Study Guide 10 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TNP Geology and Ecology Enhanced Study Guide 10 2018 Tennessee Naturalist Program Geology and Ecology Founda7on and Context Enhanced Study Guide 10/2018 Tennessee Naturalist Program www.tnnaturalist.org Inspiring the desire to learn and share Tennessee’s nature These study guides are designed to reflect and reinforce the Tennessee Naturalist Program’s course curriculum outline, developed and approved by the TNP Board of Directors, for use by TNP instructors to plan and organize classroom discussion and fieldwork components and by students as a meaningful resource to review and enhance class instruc7on. This guide was compiled specifically for the Tennessee Naturalist Program and reviewed by experts in these disciplines. It contains copyrighted work from other authors and publishers, used here by permission. No part of this document may be reproduced or shared without consent of the Tennessee Naturalist Program and appropriate copyright holders. !2 Geology and Ecology Founda/on & Context Objecves Set the founda7on and context for future classes through an examina7on of Tennessee’s geology, geography, and climate and an explora7on of general ecological concepts governing biological communi7es and ecosystems in the state. Time 4 hours -- 2 in class, 2 in field Suggested Materials ( * recommended but not required, ** TNP flash drive) • The Geologic History of Tennessee, Robert A. Miller, Bulle7n 74 (Tennessee Division of Geology) ** • Tennessee Climate and Soils (pdf from Soils of Tennessee, Springer and Elder) ** • Tennessee Soil Map 1980 ** • Terrestrial Ecological Systems of Tennessee, July 2013, NatureServe ** • Tennessee Ecoregions Map and Ecoregions Characteris7cs ** • Geology and Ecology Enhanced Study Guide, TNP ** • Samples of common rocks/minerals (classroom) Expected Outcomes Students will gain a basic understanding of 1. geologic history of Tennessee 2. physiographic provinces in Tennessee 3. rocks, fossils, and soils in Tennessee 4. climate and weather pa^erns in Tennessee 5. general ecological concepts including biological systems hierarchy, pa^erns and processes; biogeochemical cycles (water, elements, nutrient); energy flow (food web) 6. community structure and dynamics, species interac7ons, succession, biodiversity 7. environmental challenges !3 Geology and Ecology Curriculum Outline I. Geology, Geography, Soils A. Geologic history of Tennessee 1. events 7meline 2. primary events and current geographic results per grand division 3. animals and plants B. Physiographic provinces within grand divisions 1. province descrip7ons C. Shaping processes 1. geologic forces: deposi7on, sedimenta7on, weathering, erosion, volcanism, plate tectonics, metamorphism, faul7ng, folding 2. water 3. eleva7on 4. topography D. Karst topography -- caves, underground streams, and sinkholes E. Rocks 1. three primary classifica7ons -- igneous, sedimentary, metamorphic 2. common rock and mineral types – dolomite, limestone, chert, shale, sandstone, siltstone, quartzite, greywacke, phyllite, granite, etc. F. Fossils G. Soils 1. forma7on and components 2. physical/chemical proper7es and structure 3. profile 4. role of soil as an ecosystem -- living habitat 5. distribu7on of soil types II. Climate and Weather A. Define and dis7nguish B. Weather pa^erns and yearly processes 1. basic measurements 2. clouds C. Climate sta7s7cs in Tennessee 1. data to 1980, data 1981-2010 2. microclimates – pa^erns and determinants D. Phenology !4 III. Ecology A. Define 1. role of evolu7on B. Ecological systems 1. hierarchy -- individual, popula7on, community, ecosystem, landscape, biome, biosphere 2. pa^erns and processes in each C. Biogeochemical cycles 1. water 2. elements -- carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus 3. nutrients D. Community 1. species dynamics -- species richness, abundance, dominants, keystone species 2. community structure -- boundaries and size 3. energy flow -- food web, trophic levels, producers/consumers/decomposers 4. species interac7on -- compe77on, niche, resource par77oning, preda7on, and symbiosis (parasi7sm, mutualism, commensalism) E. Succession and disturbance F. Ecosystems 1. aqua7c environments 2. terrestrial environments a. generalized forest types in Tennessee b. specialized communi7es in Tennessee G. Biodiversity 1. define 2. diversity in Tennessee H. Environmental challenges (land management and stewardship) 1. pollu7on 2. development -- habitat loss, fragmenta7on 3. nonna7ve invasive species 4. rare and endangered species 5. resource extrac7on -- mining, logging, poaching, water services 6. climate change IV. Resources A. Publica7ons B. Organiza7ons C. Internet V. Review Ques7ons !5 Geology and Ecology Enhanced Study Guide I. Geology, Geography, Soils Geologic History of Tennessee Events Timeline Paleozoic Era • Seas -- Precambrian and early Cambrian (570 million years ago) • Nashville Dome Uplik -- late Ordovician Period (450 million years ago) • West Tennessee Uplik -- mid Pennsylvanian Period (300 million years ago) • Allegheny Orogeny -- early to mid Permian Period (280 million years ago) Mesozoic Era • Mississippi Embayment -- late Cretaceous Period (65 million years ago) Cenozoic Era • Glacial loess Deposi7on -- late Quaternary Period (12,000 years ago) Relief Map Rela/ng Geology to Physiographic Provinces H The Geologic History of Tennessee, Robert A. Miller, Bulle7n 74, page 10, Fig. 7 Tennessee Department of Environment and Conserva7on, Division of Geology !6 Primary Events and Current Geographic Results per Grand Division During the Precambrian and much of the early Paleozoic Era, Tennessee lay on the ocean floor, covered by advancing and receding sea waters. layers of sediment that would form limestone, dolomite, chert, shale, siltstone, sandstone, and claystone were deposited on a base of igneous and metamorphic rock. At 7mes, the seas were quite shallow, containing an evolving and increasingly vibrant fauna. As land began to emerge, flora developed. The Appalachian Foldbelt characterizes East Tennessee and reflects a mountain building episode, called the Allegheny Orogeny, resul7ng from the con7nental collision between North America and Africa that created the supercon7nent Pangaea during the Permian Period. The most obvious product is the Southern Appalachians, also called the Blue Ridge Mountains, par7cularly in the states of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. In Tennessee, the Blue Ridge Mountains are some7mes referred to as the Unaka Mountains. The Blue Ridge Province has undergone periods of uplik as erosional forces have worn down the mountains. Cambrian and Precambrian rock layers are exposed in the Blue Ridge, and the extreme pressure that built the mountains, shiked some of these older layers of rock on top of younger layers. The younger limestones erode out from under the older rock layers producing “windows,” like Cades Cove in the Smokies, and other karst forma7ons such as caves and underground streams. In Tennessee’s Valley and Ridge Province, the rock layers experienced extensive folding (like a bunched rug) and faul7ng from the Allegheny Orogeny. These folds and fractures led to differing rates of weathering as more resistant rock layers eroded slower than soker rocks, producing a series of ridges and valleys. Rocks da7ng from Cambrian to Mississippian, a 250- million-year age span, can be found in this province. The Cumberland Plateau is characterized by a cap of tough, resistant Pennsylvanian sandstone, forming an essen7ally level tableland despite eroded gorges. The abrupt eastern escarpment is a likely result from the Allegheny Orogeny and the highly dissected western escarpment is a product of erosion. Sequatchie Valley developed along a far-western fault line associated with mountain building. However, major geologic events to the east and west have had rela7vely li^le affect here. The shiking mosaic of shallow seas and emerging vegeta7on during the Pennsylvanian Period, lek dead plant material that would compress into coal deposits on the plateau. Middle Tennessee’s geography is a result of the Nashville Dome, a deforma7on or warping of sedimentary rock layers due to periodic uplik pressure from below a^ributed to a series of orogenic events beginning in the Ordovician Period with the Taconian Orogeny. This pressure, centered near present-day Murfreesboro, raised the land and cracked the bedrock surface. These cracks allowed erosion to work more efficiently on the soker limestones beneath, ul7mately producing a rela7vely flat and low depression called the Central Basin or Nashville Basin. The basin’s erosion spreads into the Highland Rim which encircles the basin. A chert layer of silica in limestone of the Mississippian Period’s Fort Payne Forma7on has slowed the erosion’s progression. The Western Highland Rim is larger, hillier, and more dissected, whereas the Eastern Highland Rim’s surface is fla^er, forming more of a plain. Fingers of erosion climb the !7 Cumberland Plateau’s steep western slope, producing a highly dissected escarpment where caves are quite prominent. A depression within a failed rik zone, centered along what is now the Mississippi River, dropped much of West Tennessee in the late Cretaceous and early Ter7ary Periods, allowing the sea to return during the Mississippi Embayment. Fresh sand and gravel deposits covered eroded stone from earlier Paleozoic sediments. late glacial advances in North America (Wisconsin glacial maximum es7mated at 25,000 - 20,000 years ago) ground rocks into a fine dust. Post- glacial floods and westerly wind pa^erns spread this glacial dust, called loess, across much of West Tennessee,
Recommended publications
  • Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama
    Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 524-C Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama By JOHN T. HACK SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 524-C Theories of landscape origin are compared using as an example an area of gently dipping rocks that differ in their resistance to erosion UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract___________________________________________ C1 Cumberland Plateau and Highland Rim as a system in Introduction_______________________________________ 1 equilibrium______________________________________ C7 General description of area___________________________ 1 Valleys and coves of the Cumberland Escarpment___ 7 Cumberland Plateau and Highland Rim as dissected and Surficial deposits of the Highland Rim____________ 10 deformed peneplains _____________________ ,... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 Elk River profile_______________________________ 12 Objections to the peneplain theory____________________ 5 Paint Rock Creek profile________________________ 14 Eastern Highland Rim Plateau as a modern peneplain__ 6 Conclusions________________________________________ 14 Equilibrium concept
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING at PRIMM PARK BRENTWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Technical Report April 2004
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AT PRIMM PARK BRENTWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Technical Report Kevin E. Smith and Christopher Hogan Report of Archaeological Investigations No. 1 Department of Sociology and Anthropology Middle Tennessee State University April 2004 CONTENTS Contents ii List of Figures iii List of Tables v Acknowledgements vi Management Summary vii I. Introduction 1 II. Prior Archaeological Research 3 III. Current Archaeological Research 13 Excavations Beneath the Floorboards 13 Artifacts from Beneath the Floorboards 15 Yard Excavations Outside the Academy 29 Artifacts from Yard Area Excavations 42 IV. Results and Recommendations 50 References Cited 52 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page 1 Project Location (USGS Franklin 7.5’ quad, 63NE) 2 2 Myer Map of the Fewkes Mound Group (1928) 2 3 Myer profile of Mound 2 4 4 Myer plan view of Mound 2 at first level 4 5 Myer plan view of Mound 2 at second level 5 6 Myer plan view of Mound 5 6 7 Myer plan view of House 6 7 8 Myer plan view of House 17 8 9 DuVall 1996 Shovel Test Locations 9 10 Plan View and Profiles of DuVall 1996 Shovel Tests 13 and 14 10 11 Plan View and Profiles of DuVall 1996 Profile Unit 11 12 Schematic of 2003 Excavations Beneath the Academy 13 13 Excavations in Progress 14 14 Screening Area 14 15 Selected architectural group artifacts 15 16 Histogram of window glass thicknesses 17 17 Slate tablet and pencils 19 18 Other small finds 19 19 Density distribution of prehistoric artifacts beneath the academy 22 20 O’Byam Incised variety Stewart sherd 25 21 Bowl sherds
    [Show full text]
  • East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 Lrrs N and S
    East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 LRRs N and S Brad D. Lee and John M. Kabrick 12.1 Introduction snowfall occurs annually in the Ozark Highlands, the Springfield Plateau, and the St. Francois Knobs and Basins The central, unglaciated US east of the Great Plains to the MLRAs. In the southern half of the region, snowfall is Atlantic coast corresponds to the area covered by LRR N uncommon. (East and Central Farming and Forest Region) and S (Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region). These regions roughly correspond to the Interior Highlands, Interior Plains, 12.2.2 Physiography Appalachian Highlands, and the Northern Coastal Plains. The topography of this region ranges from broad, gently rolling plains to steep mountains. In the northern portion of 12.2 The Interior Highlands this region, much of the Springfield Plateau and the Ozark Highlands is a dissected plateau that includes gently rolling The Interior Highlands occur within the western portion of plains to steeply sloping hills with narrow valleys. Karst LRR N and includes seven MLRAs including the Ozark topography is common and the region has numerous sink- Highlands (116A), the Springfield Plateau (116B), the St. holes, caves, dry stream valleys, and springs. The region also Francois Knobs and Basins (116C), the Boston Mountains includes many scenic spring-fed rivers and streams con- (117), Arkansas Valley and Ridges (118A and 118B), and taining clear, cold water (Fig. 12.2). The elevation ranges the Ouachita Mountains (119). This region comprises from 90 m in the southeastern side of the region and rises to 176,000 km2 in southern Missouri, northern and western over 520 m on the Springfield Plateau in the western portion Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Archaeology Is Published Semi-Annually in Electronic Print Format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology
    TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Volume 3 Spring 2008 Number 1 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Tennessee Division of Archaeology Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 3 Spring 2008 NUMBER 1 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE David Anderson 1 EDITORS CORNER University of Tennessee ARTICLES Patrick Cummins Alliance for Native American Indian Rights 3 Evidence for Early Mississippian Settlement Aaron Deter-Wolf of the Nashville Basin: Archaeological Division of Archaeology Explorations at the Spencer Site (40DV191) W. STEVEN SPEARS, MICHAEL C. MOORE, AND Jay Franklin KEVIN E. SMITH East Tennessee State University RESEARCH REPORTS Phillip Hodge Department of Transportation 25 A Surface Collection from the Kirk Point Site Zada Law (40HS174), Humphreys County, Tennessee Ashland City, Tennessee CHARLES H. MCNUTT, JOHN B. BROSTER, AND MARK R. NORTON Larry McKee TRC, Inc. 77 Two Mississippian Burial Clusters at Katherine Mickelson Travellers’ Rest, Davidson County, Rhodes College Tennessee DANIEL SUMNER ALLEN IV Sarah Sherwood University of Tennessee 87 Luminescence Dates and Woodland Ceramics from Rock Shelters on the Upper Lynne Sullivan Frank H. McClung Museum Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee JAY D. FRANKLIN Guy Weaver Weaver and Associates LLC Tennessee Archaeology is published semi-annually in electronic print format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology. Correspondence about manuscripts for the journal should be addressed to Michael C. Moore, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Cole Building #3, 1216 Foster Avenue, Nashville TN 37243. The Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology disclaims responsibility for statements, whether fact or of opinion, made by contributors. On the Cover: Human effigy bowl from Travellers’ Rest, Courtesy, Aaron Deter-Wolf EDITORS CORNER Welcome to the fifth issue of Tennessee Archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain Report
    Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain Report ## by Legend Paul R. Knox, P.G. State Line Shelf Edge Yegua-Jackson outcrop Van A. Kelley, P.G. County Boundaries Well Locations Astrid Vreugdenhil Sediment Input Axis (Size Relative to Sed. Vol.) Facies Neil Deeds, P.E. Deltaic/Delta Front/Strandplain Wave-Dominated Delta Steven Seni, Ph.D., P.G. Delta Margin < 100' Fluvial Floodplain Slope 020406010 Miles Shelf-Edge Delta Shelf/Slope Sand > 100' Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 7871-3231 September 2007 TWDB Report ##: Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain Texas Water Development Board Report ## Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain by Van A. Kelley, P.G. Astrid Vreugdenhil Neil Deeds, P.E. INTERA Incorporated Paul R. Knox, P.G. Baer Engineering and Environmental Consulting, Incorporated Steven Seni, Ph.D., P.G. Consulting Geologist September 2007 This page is intentionally blank. ii This page is intentionally blank. iv TWDB Report ##: Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain Table of Contents Executive Summary......................................................................................................................E-i 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Study Area and Geologic Setting.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Geology of Cenozoic Deposits, Gulf Coastal Plain, South-Central United States
    REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHY AND _^ SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF CENOZOIC DEPOSITS, GULF COASTAL PLAIN, SOUTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES V U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-G AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re­ leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may no longer be available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices listed below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for Review and Comment
    United States Department ofthe Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Texas Chenier Plain NWR Complex June 15, 2017 Dear Reviewer: This is to provide notification of availability of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Draft Environmental Assessment for review and comment. The Draft Environmental Assessment addresses the issuance of an Operational Permit by the USFWS for two proposed oil and natural gas drilling and production project on the Mcfaddin National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) in Jefferson County, Texas. The project has been proposed by OLEUM Exploration, LLC ofBrodheadsville, Pennsylvania. The company possesses valid leases to explore and/or develop oil and gas reserves underlying the refuge from the rightful mineral owners. The purpose for the proposed Federal action is to insure that mineral rights holders have reasonable access to develop their non-Federal oil and gas interests and minimize impacts to refuge resources to the extent practicable under the USFWS's 50 CFR Part 29, Subpart D regulations for managing non-Federal oil and gas on USFWS administered lands and waters. Issuance ofthe Operations Permit in the end should protect the human environment in such a way as to further the Refuge's efforts to achieve its established purposes, and the general resource conservation mission ofthe USFWS. Written comments may be mailed to Texas Chenier Plain Refuge Complex at P.O. Box 278, Anahuac, TX 77514. Comments may also be electronically mailed to monique [email protected] with "OLEUM EA Comments" in the subject line. All comments sent must be post marked or electronically sent by June 29th, 2017. If you need additional information, feel free to visit our offices or contact myself, Monique Slaughter, Oil and Gas Specialist for the refuge complex (409) 267-3337 or Refuge Manager Douglas Head at (409) 971-2909.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region SUMMARY of FINDINGS
    WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction
    [Show full text]
  • A Joint Local and Teleseismic Tomography Study Of
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth RESEARCH ARTICLE A joint local and teleseismic tomography study 10.1002/2015JB012761 of the Mississippi Embayment and New Madrid Key Points: Seismic Zone • We present detailed 3-D images of Vp 1 1 1 and Vs for the upper mantle below the Cecilia A. Nyamwandha , Christine A. Powell , and Charles A. Langston ME and NMSZ • A prominent low-velocity anomaly 1Center for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA with similar Vp and Vs anomalies is imaged in the upper mantle • Regions of similar high Vp and Vs anomalies present above and to the Abstract Detailed, upper mantle P and S wave velocity (Vp and Vs) models are developed for the northern sides of the low-velocity anomaly Mississippi Embayment (ME), a major physiographic feature in the Central United States (U.S.) and the location of the active New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ). This study incorporates local earthquake and teleseismic data from the New Madrid Seismic Network, the Earthscope Transportable Array, and the Correspondence to: FlexArray Northern Embayment Lithospheric Experiment stations. The Vp and Vs solutions contain anomalies C. A. Nyamwandha, with similar magnitudes and spatial distributions. High velocities are present in the lower crust beneath the [email protected] NMSZ. A pronounced low-velocity anomaly of ~ À3%–À5% is imaged at depths of 100–250 km. High-velocity anomalies of ~ +3%–+4% are observed at depths of 80–160 km and are located along the sides and top Citation: of the low-velocity anomaly. The low-velocity anomaly is attributed to the presence of hot fluids upwelling Nyamwandha, C.
    [Show full text]
  • OCTOBER 14, 2005 BLM Eastern States, Milwaukee Field Office
    MISSISSIPPI NATIONAL FORESTS REASONABLE FORESEEABLE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO FINAL REPORT: OCTOBER 14, 2005 BLM Eastern States, Milwaukee Field Office TABLE OF CONTENTS: A. Summary ....................................................................................................................................1 B. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 C. Basis of Analysis ........................................................................................................................2 D. Description of Geology ..............................................................................................................2 E. Past and Present Fluid Mineral Exploration Activity .................................................................7 F. Past and Present Fluid Mineral Development Activity ...............................................................7 G. Future Fluid Mineral Development Potential .............................................................................8 H. Reasonable Foreseeable Development Scenario Assumptions & Discussion ............................10 I. Selected Bibliography .................................................................................................................14 J. Appendices ..................................................................................................................................15 K. Accompanying Maps .................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee River Basin
    The Tennessee River Basin he Tennessee River winds its way for roughly geography and geology in the region help to explain 650 miles through Tennessee, Alabama, why the area harbors one of the most biologically TMississippi, and back into Tennessee, before diverse freshwater ecosystems in the world. reaching Kentucky where it empties into the The immense biodiversity of native and endangered Ohio River. In total the Basin encompasses over species in the Tennessee River Basin (TRB) has driven 40,000 square miles, covering five major regional efforts— engaging multiple agencies physiographic provinces: the Blue Ridge, and stakeholders to ensure the protection the Valley and Ridge, the Appalachian of this unique landscape for generations Plateau, the Interior Low Plateaus, to come. and the Coastal Plain. The extent of the Basin’s reach vast diversity of Eastern Hellbender - because of their preference for clean streams and rivers, hellbenders serve as indicators of stream health. The presence of young and adults is synonymous with good water quality. To learn more about the Tennessee River Basin Network and see how you or your organization can be involved please visit http://applcc.org/projects/trb. FACT SHEET: THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN NETWORK Tennessee River Basin Network Dedicated to the conservation of this unique region and The Network strives to E RIIV national treasure, the Tennessee River Basin Network conserve and restore aquatic SE ER S B EE A (hereafter Network) is a partnership of states, cities, counties, resources, particularly areas N A SS N N II federal agencies, academic organizations, business, and of high biologic diversity EE NN TT other non-governmental organizations dedicated to throughout the region, enhancing the health of the watersheds and biological improve water quality, resources within the Tennessee River Basin through foster increasing stewardship N increased regional collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of the Mississippi Embayment
    Water Resources of the Mississippi Embayment GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 448 This volume was published as separate chapters A I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director CONTENTS [Letters designate the separately published chapters] (A) Availability of water in the Mississippi embayment, by E. M. Cushing, E. H. Boswell, P. R. Speer, R. L. Hosman, and others. (B) General geology of the Mississippi embayment, by E. M. Cushing, E. H. Boswell, and R. L. Hosman. (C) Cretaceous aquifers in the Mississippi embayment, by E. H. Boswell, G. K. Moore, L. M. MacCary, and others, with dis­ cussions of Quality of the water, by H. G. Jeffery. (D"» Tertiary aquifers in the Mississippi embayment, by R. L. Hosman, A. T. Long, T. W. Lambert, and others, with discussions of Quality of the water, by H. G. Jeffery. (E) Quaternary aquifers in the Mississippi embayment, by E. H. Boswell, E. M. Cushing, and R. L. Hosman, with a discussion of Quality of the water, by H. G. Jeffery. (F) Low-flow characteristics of streams in the Mississippi embayment in northern Arkansas and in Missouri, by Paul R. Speer, Marion S. Hines, M. E. Janson, and others, with a section on Quality of the water, by H. G. Jeffery. (G) Low-flow characteristics of streams in the Mississippi embayment in southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and north­ eastern Texas, by Paul R. Speer, Marion S, Hines, A. J. Calandro, and others, with a section on Quality of the water, by H. G. Jeffery. (H) Low-flow characteristics of streams in the Mississippi embayment in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Illinois, by Paul R.
    [Show full text]