The Journal of Economic Asymmetries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Journal of Economic Asymmetries VOL. 8 NO. 1, 2011 THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ASYMMETRIES Co-Editor for Europe: George C. Bitros Athens University of Economics and Business Papers presented at the International Conference on Economics, Politics and Ethics in the Light of the Intellectual Inheritance of Ancient Athens Delphi, Greece, September 13-14, 2010 George Bitros, Anastassios Karayiannis,and Nicholas Kyriazis: Introduction Articles Josiah Ober: Wealthy Hellas George Tridimas: Cleisthenes’ Choice: The Emergence of Direct Democracy in Ancient Athens Nicholas Kyriazis and Anastassios Karayiannis: Democracy, Institutional Changes and Economic Development: The Case of Ancient Athens Darel Tai Engen: Democracy, Knowledge, and the Hidden Economy of Athens Jürgen Backhaus: Some Remarks on Economic Policy Advice Cosimo Perrotta: Aristotle and the Modern Economy Bertram Schefold: The Applicability of Modern Economics to Forms of Capitalism in Antiquity: Some Theoretical Considerations and Textual Evidence Carl Hampus Lyttkens: Health, Economics and Ancient Greek Medicine George Bitros and Anastassios Karayiannis: Character, Knowledge and Skills in Ancient Greek Paideia: Some Lessons for Today’s Policy Makers Christopher Merrill: The Runner Author Biographies ISSN 1703-4949 © North Waterloo Academic Press 2011 THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ASYMMETRIES The JEA has, as its major objective, to publish scholarly articles, including those on economic, financial, technological and legal asymmetries in an increasingly globalized world. The JEA welcomes submissions of manuscripts in keeping with the broad JEA theme identified above. EDITOR-IN-CHIEF FOUNDING EDITOR A. G. Malliaris, Christos C. Paraskevopoulos, deceased Loyola University Chicago CO-EDITOR FOR THE AMERICAS Leo Michelis, Ryerson University CO-EDITOR FOR EUROPE George C. Bitros Athens University of Economics & Business CO-EDITOR FOR ASIA Bala Batavia DePaul University MANAGING EDITOR PRODUCTION EDITOR Leo Michelis Mary Malliaris Ryerson University Loyola University Chicago EUROPEAN BOARD OF ASSOCIATE EDITORS Volbert Alexander, University of Giessen Bernd Kempa, University of Muenster Sven Arndt, Claremont Mckenna College Omar Licandro, European University Institute Juergen Backaus, Erfurt University Leo Michelis, Ryerson University Nicholas C. Baltas, Athens Univ. of Econ. & Bus. Robin Rowley, McGill University Evrard Claessens, University of Antwerp Apostolos Serletis, University of Calgary George M. Constantinides, University of Chicago George Tavlas, Bank of Greece George D. Demopoulos, Athens Univ. of Econ. & Riccardo Fiorito, University of Sienna GeorgeBus. M. von Furstenberg, Indiana University Peter E. Koveos, Syracuse University George G. Kaufman, Loyola University Brenda Spotton Visano, University of York SUBSCRIPTION POLICY Subscription Rates (annual): Individuals US $ 100.00; Institutions $ 200.00 Please submit fees payable to: Athenian Policy Forum, 777 Bay Street, Post Office Box 46024, Toronto, Ontario M5G2P6, Canada SUBMISSION POLICY For members the submission fee for the first paper each year is waived, for non- members, fees can be obtained from the appropriate co-editor. Submit manuscripts electronically [MS WORD] to the managing editor: [email protected]. or to the European Editor: [email protected] or the Asian editor: [email protected] The manuscripts must conform to the guidelines available at: www.apforum.org Submission of a paper will be held to imply that it contains original unpublished work and is not being submitted for publication elsewhere. Neither the editors nor the publisher take any responsibility for opinions or facts stated by contributors and for the manuscripts sent to them. Printed in Canada by North Waterloo Academic Press; 482 Lexington Crescent, Waterloo, Ontario N2K 2J8 webpage: www.nwap.on.ca; e- mail: [email protected]. Papers presented at the International Conference On Economics, Politics and Ethics in the Light of the Intellectual Inheritance of Ancient Athens Delphi, Greece, September 13-14, 2010 Introduction: Honoring the Battle of Marathon George Bitros, Anastassios Karayiannis,and Nicholas Kyriazis i Articles Josiah Ober Wealthy Hellas 1 George Tridimas Cleisthenes’ Choice: The Emergence of Direct Democracy in Ancient Athens 39 Nicholas Kyriazis and Anastassios Karayiannis Democracy, Institutional Changes and Economic Development: The Case of Ancient Athens 61 Darel Tai Engen Democracy, Knowledge, and the Hidden Economy of Athens 93 Jürgen Backhaus Some Remarks on Economic Policy Advice 107 Cosimo Perrotta Aristotle and the Modern Economy 115 Bertram Schefold The Applicability of Modern Economics to Forms of Capitalism in Antiquity: Some Theoretical Considerations and Textual Evidence 131 Carl Hampus Lyttkens Health, Economics and Ancient Greek Medicine 165 George Bitros and Anastassios Karayiannis Character, Knowledge and Skills in Ancient Greek Paideia: Some Lessons for Today’s Policy Makers 193 Christopher Merrill The Runner 221 Author Biographies 229 Introduction: Honoring the Battle of Marathon George C. Bitros1 Athens University of Economics and Business Anastassios D. Karayiannis2 University of Piraeus Nicholas K. Kyriazis3 University of Thessaly 1. Introduction In September 2010 we celebrated the 2500 anniversary of the battle of Marathon. When referring to Marathon, the mind of most people around the world goes to the Marathon Run, an Olympic athletic contest, as well as a very popular athletic event worldwide, since about 800 cities organize Marathon Runs. People know much less about the battle itself and its true significance, which has been acclaimed by such 19th century writers as Hegel, who declared that “The interests of the world’s history hung themselves in the balance,” and J. S. Mill who stressed that “The battle of Ma- rathon, even as an event in English history is more important than the battle of Hast- ings”. No doubt then, when the Athenians and their allies confronted Persians in the battle of Marathon, there was very much at stake. It was the way of living partic- ularly in Athens, which gave rise to the miracle of democracy and the far-reaching advances in the sciences of man and nature. Even though we cannot say how western civilization would have evolved had that battle been lost, we can definitely agree that we would have been much poorer today. The road to democracy and its eternal val- ues would have come to an abrupt stop. The great Greek philosophers would have been silenced to the tremendous loss of later generations; and the marvelous monu- ments and the works of art that we so admire today in the new Acropolis museum and the museums around the world would not have been realized. So in the eve of 2500 years from that battle we thought that it was very fit- ting to take stock of the intellectual accomplishments that the victory of Greeks made possible and draw lessons for today. Because, despite the centuries that separate us, the problems democracies face presently in the world are not much different. Now as i ii THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ASYMMETRIES JUNE 2011 then, there are international fundamentalisms (cultural, religious, economic, etc.). Now as then, group interests and lack of social cohesion are blotting democracies; and now as then, individual values and liberties are under attack. Hence, instead of turning to the stars for clues as to what lies ahead, what our conference aspired to accomplish was to look back at the knowledge and experience we inherited from ancient Greece in search of insights as to the proper balance among ethics, politics and economics in confronting present day problem domestically and internationally. Thus, before embarking on the presentation of the papers that we selected for this special issue of the Journal of Economic Asymmetries, we considered it a good opportunity to give a brief account of the battle itself. This will reveal the tremendous odds Greeks faced and emphasize once more that what hangs in the balance in every democracy threatening problem lies not in the physical condi- tions that shape it, but in the spirit and the convictions that drive its people to put their lives on the line in defense of their institutions, beliefs, and values. For, if ancient Greeks were not motivated by such superior ideals, in view of the odds against them, they would have surrendered. 2. A Brief Account of the Battle At the time the Persian Empire was mighty and expanding. It covered the region from today’s western Pakistan and India, to the Middle East, Egypt, and Asia Minor. Moreover, during king Darius times it included European Thrace, parts of today’s Bulgaria and Macedonia, Greek city-states in Asia Minor like Miletus and Ephesos, and Greek islands like Samos, Chios and Lesbos. Persians realized that the Greek city-states under their control would never be secure as long as independent city- states existed on the Greek mainland. Thus, almost by necessity they had to subdue them as well. The Persian invasions of 492-479 BC were a clash of civilizations and cul- tures. Persians were no barbarians in today’s sense of the word. They had a widely admired civilization, a strong centrally organized and controlled state, and a mo- notheistic religion. The Persian King of Kings was the representative of the good god Ahura Mazda on earth and had to provide law and order. Politically people in the Persian Empire were subjects, whereas Greeks were citizens, even in oligarchic states. The first encounter took place in September 490 BC in the small plain of Marathon, in the northern part of Attica. Since the Greek
Recommended publications
  • The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes
    The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes Charles Rann Kennedy The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes Table of Contents The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes..............................................................................................1 Charles Rann Kennedy...................................................................................................................................1 THE FIRST OLYNTHIAC............................................................................................................................1 THE SECOND OLYNTHIAC.......................................................................................................................6 THE THIRD OLYNTHIAC........................................................................................................................10 THE FIRST PHILIPPIC..............................................................................................................................14 THE SECOND PHILIPPIC.........................................................................................................................21 THE THIRD PHILIPPIC.............................................................................................................................25 THE FOURTH PHILIPPIC.........................................................................................................................34 i The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes Charles Rann Kennedy This page copyright © 2002 Blackmask Online.
    [Show full text]
  • The Motif of Love in Euripides' Works Helen and Medea
    THE MOTIF OF LOVE IN THE HELEN AND THE ALCESTIS OF EURIPIDES by Eleftheria N. Athanasopoulou DOCTORAL DISSERTATION submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR LITTERARUM ET PHILOSOPHIAE in GREEK in the FACULTY OF HUMANITIES at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR J. L. P. WOLMARANS JANUARY 2008 For my family, and especially for my children… «Αν κάποιος προηγείται απλώς του καιρού του, κάποια μέρα ο καιρός θα τον προλάβει». (Wittgenstein, L. 1986). «Η θάλασσα που μας πίκρανε είναι βαθιά κι ανεξερεύνητη και ξεδιπλώνει μιαν απέραντη γαλήνη». (Seferis, G. 1967). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Grateful acknowledgment is hereby made to Prof. J. L. P. Wolmarans for his advice, patience and assistance. This work would not have been completed without his encouragement. Indeed, his criticism was beneficial to the development of my ideas. It is of special significance to acknowledge the support given to me by some friends. I am particularly indebted to them for various favours. I also thank my husband for his advice, so that I could look afresh at a large number of questions. I wish to thank the anonymous reader for the improvements (s)he suggested. Johannesburg 2008 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ABSTRACT xiii ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ xi I. INTRODUCTION The Helen and the Alcestis 1 Rationale 3 Problem Statement 5 Methodology 6 Layout and Structure 8 Overview of Literature 12 Note to the Reader 14 II. THE PHILOSOPHY OF EURIPIDES AND WITTGENSTEIN Euripides’ Profile: Life and Works 15 Wittgenstein’s Profile: Life and Works 23 Euripides and Wittgenstein: Parallel Patterns of Thought 33 The Motif of Love, Language and Gloss analysis 37 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Finance and Democratic Ideology in Fourth-Century BC Athens by Christopher Scott Welser BA, Sw
    Dēmos and Dioikēsis: Public Finance and Democratic Ideology in Fourth-Century B.C. Athens By Christopher Scott Welser B.A., Swarthmore College, 1994 M.A., University of Maryland, 1999 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. May, 2011 © Copyright 2011 by Christopher Scott Welser This dissertation by Christopher Scott Welser is accepted in its present form by the Department of Classics as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date________________ _______________________________________ Adele C. Scafuro, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date________________ _______________________________________ Alan L. Boegehold, Reader Date________________ _______________________________________ David Konstan, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date________________ _______________________________________ Peter M. Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Christopher Scott Welser was born in Romeo, Michigan in 1971. He attended Roeper City and Country School in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, and in 1994 he graduated from Swarthmore College, earning an Honors B.A. in Economics (his major) and Biology (his minor). After working for several years at public policy research firms in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, he decided to pursue the study of Classics, an interest of his since childhood. Upon earning an M.A. with Distinction in Latin and Greek from the University of Maryland at College Park in 1999, he enrolled in the Ph.D. program in Classics at Brown University. While working on his Ph.D., he spent two years as Seymour Fellow (2002-2003) and Capps Fellow (2004-2005) at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens and participated in the summer program of the American Academy in Rome (2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Experiment in Early Greek Thought by Tyler Mayo A
    Research and Experiment in Early Greek Thought by Tyler Mayo A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Francesca Schironi, Chair Professor Sara Ahbel-Rappe Professor Richard Janko Associate Professor Ian Moyer Tyler Edward Mayo [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2442-7127 To my mother and father ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, ad consuetudinem maiorum, I would like to begin by acknowledging and expressing my gratitude to the members of my committee: Professors Richard Janko, Ian Moyer, and Sara Abhel-Rappe. Their suggestions and criticisms helped me to rethink some, and alter other, points within this dissertation to its improvement, and saved me from numerous errors within the text, many of which surely still lurk within these pages and are my responsibility alone. However, I owe a special debt to my chair, Francesca Schironi, whose support not only made this dissertation possible, but who acted as a mentor throughout my entire time at Michigan. Her honesty and counsel were always welcome, and her careful philology can be seen within these pages, although I fear only as an imperfect reflection. Outside Angell Hall, others made my studies in Ann Arbor possible. The Posch family— John, Dyanna, Isabel, and most recently, Jude—acted as a family away from home, not least for their generous hospitality in boarding me. I shall always remember and cherish their ξενία. My wife Liz is certainly owed a place of honor in the beginning of this dissertation. Her support was essential in its creation as in all other things.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport in Europe from the Roman Empire to the Renaissance
    Sport in the Global Society General Editors: J.A. Mangan and Boria Majumdar BODY AND MIND Sport in the global society Series Editors: J. A. Mangan and Boria Majumdar The interest in sports studies around the world is growing and will continue to do so. This unique series combines aspects of the expanding study of sport in the global society, providing comprehensiveness and comparison under one editorial umbrella. It is particularly timely, as studies in the multiple elements of sport proliferate in institutions of higher education. Eric Hobsbawm once called sport one of the most signifi cant practices of the late nineteenth century. Its signifi cance was even more marked in the late twentieth century and will continue to grow in importance in the new millennium as the world develops into a ‘global village’ sharing the English language, technology and sport. Other titles in the series Disreputable Pleasures Women, Sport and Society in Less Virtuous Victorians at Play Modern China Edited by Mike Huggins and Holding up More than Half the Sky J.A. Mangan Dong Jinxia A Sport-Loving Society Freeing the Female Body Victorian and Edwardian Middle- Inspirational Icons Class England at Play Edited by J.A. Mangan and Fan Hong Edited by J.A. Mangan From Fair Sex to Feminism Capoeira Sport and the Socialization of Women in The History of Afro-Brazilian Martial the Industrial and post-Industrial Eras Art Edited by J.A. Mangan and Roberta J. Park Matthias Röhrig Assunção Leisure and Recreation in a Barbarians, Gentlemen and Victorian Mining Community Players The Social Economy of Leisure in North- A Sociological Study of the East England, 1820–1914 Development of Rugby Football Alan Metcalfe Second Edition Eric Dunning and Kenneth Sheard The Commercialisation of Football, Europe and the Press Sport Liz Crolley and David Hand Edited by Trevor Slack Tribal Identities Making European Masculinities Nationalism, Europe, Sport Sport, Europe and Gender Edited by J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing the Athenian State: Public Choice in the Age of Demosthenes
    Eur J Law Econ (2009) 27:109–127 DOI 10.1007/s10657-008-9081-7 Financing the Athenian state: public choice in the age of Demosthenes Nicholas Kyriazis Published online: 18 November 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The present essay analyses Athenian finances during the fourth century BC, the ‘Age of Demosthenes’, from both the revenue and expenditure points of view. It examines how Athenians practiced the concept of ‘economic democracy’ on matters of public choice, and the sometimes ingenious solutions they adopted for financing public goods such as defense, education and ‘social security’. Ancient Athens, the ‘prototype’ political democracy, was advanced also in matters of public administration, finance and institutions, on which political democracy was based and without their smooth running could not have functioned. Keywords Institutions Á Ancient Athens Á Economic development Á Finance JEL Classifications N00 Á N01 Á N013 Á H41 Á A13 1 Introduction 1.1 The Athenian democracy Athenian democracy was established during 510–507 BC when Cleisthenes, leader of the democratic party, overthrew the tyrant Hippias and lasted, with very brief interruptions during 407 and 404–403 BC, until its defeat by the Macedonians in 322 BC. It seems that democracy was practised again during the 3rd–2nd centuries A first draft of this essay was presented at a lecture at the Economics Department, Center for Leadership, Exeter University, November 22nd, 2007. N. Kyriazis (&) University of Thessaly, Thessaly, Greece e-mail: [email protected] 123 110 Eur J Law Econ (2009) 27:109–127 BC, until the Roman conquest of Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Aestimatio: Critical Reviews in the History of Science Is Distributed Electronically Free of Charge At
    AESTIMATIO Critical Reviews in the History of Science Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science Editor Alan C. Bowen, IRCPS Associate Editor Andrea Falcon, Concordia University Publication Manager Pamela A. Cooper, IRCPS Charles Burnett The Warburg Institute Serafina Cuomo Birkbeck College Bruce S. Eastwood University of Kentucky Gad Freudenthal CNRS, Paris Bernard R. Goldstein University of Pittsburgh Stephen Johnston Oxford University Richard Kieckhefer Northwestern University Advisory Editors Daryn Lehoux Queen’s University William Newman Indiana University Vivian Nutton University College London Kim Plofker Union College Eileen A. Reeves Princeton University Francesca Rochberg University of California, Berkeley Ken Saito Osaka Prefecture University Nancy Siraisi Hunter College John M. Steele Brown University Robert B. Todd Toronto, Ontario, Canada Christian Wildberg University of Pittsburgh AESTIMATIO Critical Reviews in the History of Science Volume 13 2016–2018 Edited by Alan C. Bowen A Publication of the Institute for Research in Classical Philosophy and Science Baysville, Ontario, Canada © 2018 Institute for Research in Classical Philosophy and Science All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this volume may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher, the Institute for Research in Classical Philosophy and Science. All inquiries should be addressed to the Institute for Research in Classical Philosophy and Science. ISSN 1549–4470 ISBN 978–1–60724–617–6 This volume is printed on acid-free paper that meets ANSI standard Z39.48, Permanence of Paper for Publications and Documents in Libraries and Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Economic Asymmetries
    VOL. 8 NO. 1, 2011 THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ASYMMETRIES Co-Editor for Europe: George C. Bitros Athens University of Economics and Business Papers presented at the International Conference on Economics, Politics and Ethics in the Light of the Intellectual Inheritance of Ancient Athens Delphi, Greece, September 13-14, 2010 George Bitros, Anastassios Karayiannis,and Nicholas Kyriazis: Introduction Articles Josiah Ober: Wealthy Hellas George Tridimas: Cleisthenes’ Choice: The Emergence of Direct Democracy in Ancient Athens Nicholas Kyriazis and Anastassios Karayiannis: Democracy, Institutional Changes and Economic Development: The Case of Ancient Athens Darel Tai Engen: Democracy, Knowledge, and the Hidden Economy of Athens Jürgen Backhaus: Some Remarks on Economic Policy Advice Cosimo Perrotta: Aristotle and the Modern Economy Bertram Schefold: The Applicability of Modern Economics to Forms of Capitalism in Antiquity: Some Theoretical Considerations and Textual Evidence Carl Hampus Lyttkens: Health, Economics and Ancient Greek Medicine George Bitros and Anastassios Karayiannis: Character, Knowledge and Skills in Ancient Greek Paideia: Some Lessons for Today’s Policy Makers Christopher Merrill: The Runner Author Biographies ISSN 1703-4949 [next page is the inside of front cover] © North Waterloo Academic Press 2011 THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ASYMMETRIES The JEA has, as its major objective, to publish scholarly articles, including those on economic, financial, technological and legal asymmetries in an increasingly globalized world. The JEA welcomes submissions of manuscripts in keeping with the broad JEA theme identified above. EDITOR-IN-CHIEF FOUNDING EDITOR A. G. Malliaris, Christos C. Paraskevopoulos, deceased Loyola University Chicago CO-EDITOR FOR THE AMERICAS Leo Michelis, Ryerson University CO-EDITOR FOR EUROPE George C.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogo Della Musica Antica Et Della Moderna of Vincenzo Galilei
    no. 730o V, 1 DIALOGO DELLA MUSICA ANTICA ET DELLA MODERNA OF VINCENZO GALILEI: TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Robert H. Herman, M. M. Denton, Texas August, 1973 Herman, Robert H., Dialog dell musica antics et della modern of Vincenso Galilei: Translation and on- mmeentaryDoctor of Philosophy (Music Theory), August, 1973, 929 pp., 43 tables, bibliography, 165 titles, index. The purpose of this study is to provide a practical English translation of Vincenzo Galilei's significant treatise on ancient and modern music (1581). In spite of the important place this work holds in the history of music, it has never before been made available in its entirety in any language other than the original Italian. The Dialogo della music a antics et della modern was, in effect, an expression of monodic tendencies in Italian music of the sixteenth century. While the prevailing vocal compositional style was contrapuntal, Galilei advocated the development of homophonic pieces, which could produce in their hearers whatever affections or emotions the composer desired to convey. The emphasis was on simplicity of melody, with only a few chords for accompaniment. This style, with its sparseness of means, was influenced by the music of the ancient Greeks, whose philosophies and art forms were in credit at the time, having been revived by such Renaissance humanists as Lorenzo di Medici, Marsilio Ficino, and Angelo Poliziano. Galilei, influenced by the erudite Girolamo Mei, who was 2 a classical philologist, drew away from his former mentor, Gioseffo Zarlino, a firm believer in traditional counter- point.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Andreas Serafim 2010
    Copyright by Andreas Serafim 2010 The Report committee for Andreas Serafim Certifies that this is the approved version of the following report: Performing the Law: The theatrical features of Demosthenes’ On the Crown APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: _______________________________________ Michael Gagarin _______________________________________ Jeffrey Walker Performing the Law: The theatrical features of Demosthenes’ On the Crown by Andreas Serafim, B.A. Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2010 Dedication Τῷ πατρὶ καὶ τῇ μητρὶ καὶ τοῖς ἐμοῖς διδασκάλοις Acknowledgements Throughout the course of writing this Master’s report, I have incurred many debts. First, I have to acknowledge all of those magnanimous teachers who offer me their valuable assistance, advice, and encouragement in my first steps as classicist. Let me begin by expressing my thankful thoughts to my first teacher in the discipline, Sophia Papaioannou. She ignited my interest for Greek and Latin literature and shaped many of my perspectives on the ancient world. I am grateful for her support and her friendly mentorship in my alma mater, the University of Cyprus. At the University of Texas at Austin, I have profited immensely from the knowledge and support of Paul Woodruff, William Nethercut, Lesley Dean-Jones, and of the rest of Classics family. I am deeply indebted to my supervisor, Michael Gagarin, for his academic nurturing over the last two years. Under his guidance, I have been introduced to the study of ancient Greek Law.
    [Show full text]
  • War, Disenfranchisement and the Fall of the Ancient Athenian Democracy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ulster University's Research Portal War, disenfranchisement and the fall of the ancient Athenian democracy George Tridimas* European Journal of Political Economy 2015, vol. 31, pp 102 – 117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.01.002 Abstract The ancient Athenian democracy emerged in 508 (all dates BCE), became a dominant naval power, fought a multitude of external wars and ended in 322 after it was defeated by Macedon and was replaced by oligarchy. The paper employs a political economy framework to examine the demise of democracy. It illustrates that war was a means of redistribution, benefiting the majority of poorer Athenians at the expense of the rich elite, who bore a disproportionate burden of its cost. A model of conflict is set up to study the incentives of the poor majority to go to war. After analyzing a dynamic setting it also investigates the circumstances when after defeating Athens her enemy chooses to impose oligarchy that disenfranchises the poor. As victory at war is probabilistic it is concluded that the fall of the democracy was neither unavoidable nor inevitable. JEL Classification: D7, H3, N4 Key words: Democracy; Ancient Athens; redistribution; conflict; disenfranchisement Acknowledgements: Previous versions of the paper have been presented to the VSE Prague Economics Seminar, 2014, the 2014 European Public Choice Conference in Cambridge, and the Frontier Research in Economic and Social History Workshop in Esbjerg, 2014. I wish to thank participants in those events and two anonymous referees for comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Music Theory in the Context Of
    Ancient Greek Music Theory in the Context of Historiography: Filling a Lacuna in the Study of the Greek Systema Teleion — The Music of Ancient Greece: An Encyclopaedia (1978) by Solon Michaelides1 Walter Kurt Kreyszig University of Saskatchewan [email protected] Ancient Greek Music in the Context of Its Revival During the Era of Humanism During the era of humanism, spanning the period from approximately 1400 to 1600, people of various paths of life and disciplines displayed a keen interest in the discovery of the ancient fascination with learning, an endeavour which took those interested in this inquiry back in time to the centuries prior to the common era (B.C.E.), and as such to the Greek, Byzantine, Judaic, and Arabic traditions.2 This fascination and preoccupation with various disciplines, such as the quadrivium, comprising arithmetic, geometry, astronomy and music, and the trivium, comprising grammar, dialectics, and rhetoric, with the disciplines of the quadrivium and trivium also known as the artes liberales,3 key to the curriculum of the facultas artium, furthermore the artes mechanicae,4 and finally those disciplines located outside the realm of these two categories of classifications, such as theology, medicine, and law, all situated within the university curriculum,5 in turn rendered invaluable insights into the theory and practice of each discipline identified during the Greek and Byzantine eras and also during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.6 With regard to the discipline of musica, the three strands of contemplation, that is, musica theorica, in reference to the abstract theory explored largely through Pythagorean arithmetic, musica practica, in reference to the art of composition and performance, and musica poetica were generally treated as separate entities in the 1 A shorter version of this paper was presented at the International Conference “Solon Michaelides: Life, Work and Legacy” at the UNESCO Amphitheater, University of Nicosia, Cyprus, on Saturday, May 14, 2016 as part of Session 3, chaired by Professor Dr.
    [Show full text]