Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World Plants and Empire Plants and Empire Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World Londa Schiebinger Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England Copyright © 2004 by Londa Schiebinger All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America First Harvard University Press paperback edition, 2007 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schiebinger, Londa L. Plants and empire : colonial bioprospecting in the Atlantic World / Londa Schiebinger. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN-13 978-0-674-01487-9 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN-10 0-674-01487-1 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN-13 978-0-674-02568-4 (pbk.) ISBN-10 0-674-02568-7 (pbk.) 1. Pride-of-Barbados (Plant). 2. Herbal abortifacients—History. 3. Slavery—Caribbean Area—History. I. Title. RG137.45.S35 2004 581.6Ј34—dc22 2004047364 To the memory of the men and women whose knowledge of fertility control has been lost in the mists of time and to the ravages of history Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 “The Base for All Economics” 5 Plan of the Book 12 1 Voyaging Out 23 Botanistes Voyageurs 25 Maria Sibylla Merian 30 Biopirates 35 Who Owns Nature? 44 Voyaging Botanical Assistants 46 Creole Naturalists and Long-Term Residents 51 Armchair Botanists 57 The Search for the Amazons 62 Heroic Narratives 65 2 Bioprospecting 73 Drug Prospecting in the West Indies 75 Biocontact Zones 82 Secrets and Monopolies 90 Drug Prospecting at Home 93 Brokers of International Knowledge 100 3 Exotic Abortifacients 105 Merian’s Peacock Flower 107 Abortion in Europe 113 Abortion in the West Indies 128 Abortion and the Slave Trade 142 viii Contents 4 The Fate of the Peacock Flower in Europe 150 Animal Testing 153 Self-Experimentation 156 Human Subjects 159 Testing for Sexual Difference 166 The Complications of Race 171 Abortifacients 177 5 Linguistic Imperialism 194 Empire and Naming the Kingdoms of Nature 197 Naming Conundrums 206 Exceptions: Quassia and Cinchona 211 Alternative Naming Practices 219 Conclusion: Agnotology 226 Notes 243 Bibliography 286 Credits 298 Index 300 Acknowledgments This book was a pleasure to write. It took me to exotic places and brought me into contact with wonderful scholars from many parts of the globe. I thank Roy Vickery of the Natural History Museum, London, for kindly opening for me Hans Sloane’s herbarium (the first eight volumes contain Sloane’s plants from Jamaica). The staff of the Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, let me rum- mage through their many varieties of the Poinciana from specimen draw- ers stretching from ceiling to floor in room after room. I also thank John Symons at the Wellcome Library, London; the knowledgeable archivists and staff at the Bibliothèque Centrale Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris; the Centre des Archives d’Outre-Mer, Aix-en-Provence; and the National Library of Jamaica, Kingston, who helped with images and arcane materials. Numerous colleagues directed me at crucial mo- ments to valuable information. Jim McClellan generously shared his in- triguing archival find concerning “the potato with two roots”; in addition he read and helpfully commented on the manuscript. Sue Broomhall called Mme. Claude Gauvard’s work to my attention. Jerome Handler di- rected me to sources on midwifery in Barbados. Karen Reeds told me about Mark Jameson and his sixteenth-century garden of plants for gynecological complaints. Philip Boucher shared his expertise on various matters concerning Rochefort and du Tertre. Staffan Müller-Wille pointed me to Linnaeus’ evaluation of Dahlberg and kindly read Chapter 5. Roberta Bivins called Sir William Jones’s work to my attention. Claudia Swan shared information on the fascinating “root cutters.” Lee Ann Newsom helped with technical questions concerning the biogeographical origins of the Poinciana. Brian Ogilvie read and commented very helpfully on Chapter 5. Linda Woodbridge provided the lovely citation from Ben Jonson. Clem Hawes came to my aid when I required an expert on Daniel Defoe’s Moll Flanders. Sue Hanley read sections of Chapter 3 and an- ix x Acknowledgments swered questions about French law. Matthew Restall provided informa- tion on Tabachin and all things Spanish. Minnie Sinha provided careful comments on the theories and practices of imperialism. Alan Walker of- fered splendid insights into current scientific naming practices. Barbara Bush, Richard Drayton, Pamela Smith, and Emma Spary all provided much-needed advice and materials on the history of medicine, natural his- tory, or the West Indies. Finally, a special thanks to Paula Findlen for her generous support for my many projects. Much of this book was written during my year at the Max-Planck- Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte (1999–2000). Warm thanks to Lorraine Daston for her intellectual sparkle and kind hospitality. I also thank the Institute’s library staff for tracking down and photocopying nu- merous sources. Support for that year was provided by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. I was the first woman historian to win the Alexan- der von Humboldt Research Prize; I know there will be many to follow. Travel to archives and time for writing were also supported by the Na- tional Science Foundation and the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. I am also grateful for the generous support for my re- search provided by Dean Susan Welch and A. Gregg Roeber at Pennsylva- nia State University. A warm thanks to Elizabeth Knoll, my patient editor, who made the journey through press a pleasant one. My thanks, too, to my research assistants: Mary Faulkner, Sarah Goodfellow, and Katherine Maas—the book is better because of you. Finally, I owe a special debt of gratitude to Ed Dumond who kept all my equipment running. Sections of various chapters appeared in Endeavour; Hypatia; Caroline Jones and Peter Galison’s edited volume Picturing Science, Producing Art; Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal’s Moral Authority of Nature; Pamela Smith and Benjamin Schmidt’s Knowledge and Its Making; my own and Claudia Swan’s Colonial Botany. I thank these journals, editors, and presses for permission to reprint those materials. Finally, it takes a village to sustain intellectual vigor. The students in my graduate seminar, “Colonial Exchange,” pored over my manuscript and offered many wonderful corrections and suggestions—thanks to them all. My colleagues and friends—Rich Doyle, Laura Giannetti, Amy Greenberg, Gillian Hadfield, Ronnie Hsia, Mary Pickering, Guido Ruggiero, Sophie de Schaepdrijver, Susan Squier, and Nancy Tuana—all provided warmth, chatter, food, and sometimes even dance parties at cru- cial moments. To Robert Proctor, Geoffrey Schiebinger, and Jonathan Proctor, my love. Plants and Empire Introduction The Indians, who are not treated well by their Dutch masters, use the seeds [of this plant] to abort their children, so that their children will not become slaves like they are. The black slaves from Guinea and Angola have demanded to be well treated, threatening to refuse to have children. In fact, they sometimes take their own lives because they are treated so badly, and because they believe they will be born again, free and living in their own land. They told me this themselves. In this moving passage from her magnificent 1705 Metamorphosis insec- torum Surinamensium, Maria Sibylla Merian recorded how the African slave and Indian populations in Surinam, a Dutch colony, used the seeds of a plant she identified as the flos pavonis, literally “peacock flower,” as an abortifacient.1 This luxuriant plant still grows wild and in hedgerows and gardens throughout the Caribbean, and continues today to be known to many herb women and bush doctors as providing effective brews for in- ducing abortion. Unlike the prolific peacock flower, Merian’s work is rare and remark- able. A celebrated artist, the German-born Merian was one of very few European women to travel on her own in this period in pursuit of sci- ence. Women naturalists rarely figured in the rush to know exotic lands: Johanna Helena Herolt, Merian’s eldest daughter, collected and painted insects and plants, much like her mother, in Surinam in 1711 when her husband traveled there to look after his business interests. Jeanne Baret became the first woman to circumnavigate the globe in 1776, but she sailed, disguised as a male, as an assistant to Philibert Commerson, the ship’s botanist and the father of her illegitimate child. In the nineteenth century, women like Lady Charlotte Canning did sometimes collect bo- tanical specimens, but almost always as colonial wives, traveling where their husbands happened to take them and not in pursuit of their own sci- entific programs.2 Merian’s passage is also remarkable for what it reveals about the geopol- itics of plants in the so-called “early modern world.” Historians have 1 2 Plants and Empire [To view this image, refer to the print version of this title.] Figure I.1. Merian’s flos pavonis (literally, peacock flower), which she described as a nine-foot-tall plant with brilliant yellow and red blossoms. Note the hearty seed (shown on the right through the opening in the pod) with which Merian claimed Arawak and African slave women aborted their children. Various parts of this plant are still used in many places in the Caribbean today as an abortifacient. Introduction 3 rightly focused on the explosion of knowledge associated with the scien- tific revolution and global expansion, and the frantic transfer of trade goods and plants between Europe and its colonies.3 While much literature on colonial science has focused on how knowledge is made and moved be- tween continents and heterodox traditions, I explore here instances of the nontransfer of important bodies of knowledge from the New World into Europe. In doing so, I develop a methodological tool that Robert N. Proctor has called “agnotology”—the study of culturally-induced igno- rances—that serves as a counterweight to more traditional concerns for epistemology.4 Agnotology refocuses questions about “how we know” to include questions about what we do not know, and why not.
Recommended publications
  • An Antillean Plant of Beauty, a French Botanist, and a German Name: Naming Plants in the Early Modern Atlantic World
    Estonian Journal of Ecology, 2012, 61, 1, 37–50 doi: 10.3176/eco.2012.1.05 An Antillean plant of beauty, a French botanist, and a German name: naming plants in the Early Modern Atlantic world Laura Hollsten Faculty of Arts, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Åbo, Finland; [email protected] Received 10 December 2010, revised 7 March 2011, accepted 27 June 2011 Abstract. This paper investigates the naming of plants in the work of the French botanist Charles Plumier (1646–1704). Plumier made three trips to the French Antilles between 1690 and 1697, was appointed royal botanist in 1693, and published his first work, Description des Plantes de l’Amérique, in the same year. Plumier was the first ‘modern’ botanist to describe the flora of the Caribbean in a time when natural history underwent significant qualitative changes as a result of the European expansion and transatlantic contacts. Plumier’s ambition was to replace the confusing multitude of names given to New World plants with a universal taxonomically based nomenclature. His modernity and scientific ethos manifest themselves in his neutral way of organizing the plants according to a taxonomic system and his use of a Latin nomenclature, often naming plants after well-known botanists. Through Plumier’s naming process, I argue, it is possible to highlight the colonial and Atlantic context of his work, his network as part of the scientific elite of his country, and his professionalism resulting from years of botanical studies. Key words: history of botany, early modern natural history, plant nomenclature. INTRODUCTION According to a story entitled ‘The Tree of Riches’, the French botanist Charles Plumier decided that he would like to travel the world and get rich (Pellowski, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • A Synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) James Andrew Lackey Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1977 A synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) James Andrew Lackey Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Lackey, James Andrew, "A synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) " (1977). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5832. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5832 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prespective Study of Clitoria Ternatia and Its Pharmacological Importance
    High Technology Letters ISSN NO : 1006-6748 A PRESPECTIVE STUDY OF CLITORIA TERNATIA AND ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE S. GEJALAKSHMI *1, N. HARIKRISHNAN FACULTY OF PHARMACY, DR.M.G.R. EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, VELAPPANCHAVADI, CHENNAI-77 Abstract: Medicinal herbs and aromatic plants have been extensively used for the past few decades due to its potency and minimal side effects. By observing the medicinal importance of the climbing herb Clitoria ternatea (CT)of Fabeacea family and commonly known as Butterfly pea and Shankpushpi has been taken up due to its high medicinal value due to its wide range of use over decade as memory enhancer,antidepressant,anticonvulsant,transquilizers and sedative agent.A series of secondary metabolite including triterpenoids,flavone glycosides,anthocyanins and i steroids has been isolated from CT extracts.CT plant has wide range of pharmacological activity such as antimicrobial,antipyretic,diuretic,local anaesthetic.CT has been used for several diseases due to availability of several active constituents like alkaloids,flavanoids,saponins,tannins,carbohydrates .This review is an platform to explore the phytochemical investigation and pharmacological importance of CT,which have been practiced in traditional system of medicine and its future potential prespectives in view of innumerable therapeutic importance on this well-known twinning climber. Key words: Shankpushpi,phytochemical,antibacterial,anti- fungal, anti-cancer Introduction: Herbal drugs has an impact for curing disorders. The medicinal herbs are rich in various phytochemical constituents which has been found for traditional system of medicines. In the present reveiw focused on the traditional importance of clitoria ternatea. (CT).It is perennial twinning herb. It is a member of fabiaecea family and it has various synonym like blue pea.
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Afterlives: Life, Death, and Knowledge-Making in Early Modern British Scienti C and Medical Archives
    Archival Afterlives: Life, Death, and Knowledge-Making in Early Modern British Scienti!"c and Medical Archives Kohn Centre The Royal Society 2 June 2015 Conference Description: Early modern naturalists collected, generated, and shared massive amounts of paper. Inspired by calls for the wholesale reform of natural philosophy and schooled in humanist note-taking practices, they generated correspondence, reading notes (in margins, on scraps, in notebooks), experimental and observational reports, and drafts (rough, partial, fair) of treatises intended for circulation in manuscript or further replication in print. If naturalists claimed all knowledge as their province, natural philosophy was a paper empire. In our own day, naturalists’ materials, ensconced in archives, libraries, and (occasionally) private hands, are now the foundation of a history of science that has taken a material turn towards paper, ink, pen, and !"ling systems as technologies of communication, information management, and knowledge production. Recently, the creation of such papers, and their originators’ organization of them and intentions for them have received much attention. The lives archives lived after their creators’ deaths have been explored less often. The posthumous fortunes of archives are crucial both to their survival as historical sources today and to their use as scienti!"c sources in the past. How did (often) disorderly collections of paper come to be “the archives of the Scienti!"c Revolution”? The proposed conference considers the histories of these papers from the early modern past to the digital present, including collections of material initially assembled by Samuel Hartlib, John Ray, Francis Willughby, Isaac Newton, Hans Sloane, Martin Lister, Edward Lhwyd, Robert Hooke, and Théodore de Mayerne.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Dahlia Myths.Pub
    Cavanilles’ detailed illustrations established the dahlia in the botanical taxonomy In 1796, the third volume of “Icones” introduced two more dahlia species, named D. coccinea and D. rosea. They also were initially thought to be sunflowers and had been brought to Spain as part of the Alejandro Malaspina/Luis Neé expedition. More than 600 drawings brought the plant collection to light. Cavanilles, whose extensive correspondence included many of Europe’s leading botanists, began to develop a following far greater than his title of “sacerdote” (priest, in French Abbé) ever would have offered. The A. J. Cavanilles archives of the present‐day Royal Botanical Garden hold the botanist’s sizable oeu‐ vre, along with moren tha 1,300 letters, many dissertations, studies, and drawings. In time, Cavanilles achieved another goal: in 1801, he was finally appointed professor and director of the garden. Regrettably, he died in Madrid on May 10, 1804. The Cavanillesia, a tree from Central America, was later named for this famousMaterial Spanish scientist. ANDERS DAHL The lives of Dahl and his Spanish ‘godfather’ could not have been any more different. Born March 17,1751, in Varnhem town (Västergötland), this Swedish botanist struggled with health and financial hardship throughout his short life. While attending school in Skara, he and several teenage friends with scientific bent founded the “Swedish Topographic Society of Skara” and sought to catalogue the natural world of their community. With his preacher father’s support, the young Dahl enrolled on April 3, 1770, at Uppsala University in medicine, and he soon became one of Carl Linnaeus’ students.
    [Show full text]
  • Today, My Favorite Azalea Companion Plant of an Herbaceous Perennial Type Is
    Today, My Favorite Azalea Companion Plant of an Herbaceous Perennial Type Is.... By William C. Miller III—Bethesda, Maryland This is the third in a series of “favorite” articles. The natural distribution, however, extends into The azaleas ‘Ambrosia’ and ‘Opal’ were previ- Canada and Mexico and private gardens across the ously identified as my favorite Glenn Dale and US where it is a very popular element in water and Linwood Hardy Hybrids respectively.1 It occurred rain gardens and might not be represented on the to me that it would be useful to expand my focus government map. It was introduced into Europe in to the rest of the plant kingdom, since very few the mid-1620s and has become naturalized. Since people have gardens that are limited to azaleas. it isn’t overly competitive, it is technically consid- Companion plants, often overlooked in the ered non-native rather than “invasive.” homeowner garden planning process, comprise a surprisingly significant feature in every garden. Lobelia, the Genus There is the canopy and the understory trees, above the azaleas, represented by the taller trees The genus was named after Matthias de l’Obel, (e.g., oak, beech, pine, maple) and the smaller a Flemish physician and botanist (1538-1616) by Charles Plumier, a French priest, botanist, and trees (e.g., dogwood, maple, redbud, and stewar- 2,3 tia). There are plants that share the profile level New World plant explorer (1646-1704). They with the azaleas (e.g., holly, viburnum, hydrangea, both were significant influences on Linnaeus who and other rhododendrons). Finally, there are the is often called the father of taxonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacognostical and Physico–Chemical Standardization of Leaves of Caesalpinia Pulcherrima
    IJRPC 2011, 1(4) Pawar et al. ISSN: 22312781 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY Available online at www.ijrpc.com Research Article PHARMACOGNOSTICAL AND PHYSICO–CHEMICAL STANDARDIZATION OF LEAVES OF CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA C. R. Pawar1*, R. B. Kadtan1, A. A. Gaikwad1 and D. B. Kadtan2 1S.N.D. College of Pharmacy, Babhulgaon, Yeola, Nasik (Dt.), Maharashtra, India. 2R.C. Patel institute of pharmacy, Shirpur, Dhule, Maharashtra, India. *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Caesalpinia pulcherrima belonging to family Caesalpiniaceae is distributed throught out India. Commonly it is known as Peacock-flower. Plant shows diterpenoids, isovouacaperol, sitosterol and flavonoids. The plant is considered as emmenagogue, purgative and stimulant, abotificient and also used in bronchitis, asthma and malarial fever, leaves used as antipyretic, antimicrobial. Flower also shows antioxidant and antiviral activity. The present study deals with the macroscopical and microscopical studies of Caesalpinia pulcherrima leaf. Macroscopically, the Caesalpinia pulcherrima is compound leaf, ovate shape, entire margin and glabrous surface, asymmetrical base, small petiole. The microscopic study showed presence of collenchyma, vascular bundle, spongy parenchyma, palisade cells, stomata. Some distinct characters were observed while studying the transverse sections. Physiochemical studies revealed total ash, acid insoluble ash, water insoluble ash, loss on drying, alcohol soluble extractive, water soluble extractive and preliminary phytochemical studies of the leaves were also carried out. The present study might be useful to supplement information in regard to its identification parameters. Keywords: Caesalpinia pulcherrima, physico-chemical analysis, phytochemical study. INTRODUCTION diterpenoids, isovouacaperol, sitosterol also Caesalpinia pulcherrima is also known as present. Caesalpinia pulcherrima is used for a peacock flower1 is the type of genus fabaceae various purpose of herbal medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Plant Diversity for Threat Elements: a Case Study of Nargu Wildlife Sanctuary, North Western Himalaya
    Ceylon Journal of Science 46(1) 2017: 75-95 DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v46i1.7420 RESEARCH ARTICLE Assessment of plant diversity for threat elements: A case study of Nargu wildlife sanctuary, north western Himalaya Pankaj Sharma*, S.S. Samant and Manohar Lal G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Himachal Unit, Mohal- Kullu-175126, H.P., India Received: 12/07/2016; Accepted: 16/02/2017 Abstract: Biodiversity crisis is being experienced losses, over exploitation, invasions of non-native throughout the world, due to various anthropogenic species, global climate change (IUCN, 2003) and and natural factors. Therefore, it is essential to disruption of community structure (Novasek and identify suitable conservation priorities in biodiversity Cleland, 2001). As a result of the anthropogenic rich areas. For this myriads of conservational pressure, the plant extinction rate has reached approaches are being implemented in various ecosystems across the globe. The present study has to137 species per day (Mora et al., 2011; Tali et been conducted because of the dearth of the location- al., 2015). At present, the rapid loss of species is specific studies in the Indian Himalayas for assessing estimated to be between 1,000–10,000 times the ‘threatened species’. The threat assessment of faster than the expected natural extinction rate plant species in the Nargu Wildlife Sanctuary (NWS) (Hilton-Taylor, 2000). Under the current of the northwest Himalaya was investigated using scenario, about 20% of all species are likely to Conservation Priority Index (CPI) during the present go extinct within next 30 years and more than study.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Global Network for the in Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs
    THEMATIC BACKGROUND STUDY Establishment of a Global Network for the In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 39 October 2009 COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ESTABLISHMENT OF A GLOBAL NETWORK FOR THE IN SITU CONSERVATION OF CROP WILD RELATIVES: STATUS AND NEEDS by *By Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not .necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members 2 * School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham. Disclaimer The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or its Members. The designations employed and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. CONTENTS SUMMARY 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 PART 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Background and scope 8 1.2 The global and local importance of crop wild relatives 10 1.3 Definition of a crop wild relative 12 1.4 Global numbers of crop
    [Show full text]
  • Candice Lin a Hard White Body, a Soft White Worm 10.02
    16 Photograph of a box of plant material gathered by the Tropical 34 Candice Lin, 2017, watercolor and gouache on paper. Drawing of Candice Lin 10.02.–08.04.2018 Agronomy Garden in Paris for use in French public schools, as part tobacco leaves infected with Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV). In the of the educational arm of the colonial system, highlighting the 19th century, racialized accounts of the disease described the plants A Hard White Body, Opening: 09.02.2018, 19h riches of the French empire. Credit: CIRAD Historical library. as “going mulatto.” Lin transposes this description in her drawing by a Soft White Worm giving the leaves human profiles. 17 Cacao pod. 35 Candice Lin, 2017, ink on paper. Charles Chamberland (1851-1908), an 18 Porcelain remnants with dead mushrooms that formerly grew on associate of Louis Pasteur, is credited with developing this filter. In the unfired porcelain installation in Paris. this drawing, a porcelain bar inserted into a glass boiler flask filters bacteria from a solution. Use of the porcelain filter in studies of the 19 Ridley, Glynis: The Discovery of Jeanne Baret, New York, Random Tobacco Mosaic Virus revealed that viruses were separate from House, 2010, 100-101. bacteria and gave rise to the field of virology. EN 20 Candice Lin, 2017, Watercolor on paper. 36 Ingredients of the Detox Tea. See caption 40. of internalized self-loathing. Here, in preserved fragments, it represents the way stories are 21 Denis Diderot: Nachtrag zu “Bougainvilles Reise”, Insel Verlag, 37 An advertisement for the porcelain filter designed by Charles Portikus is pleased to announce the exhibition recomposed in incomplete and new arrange- [1796], 1965, 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesalpinia Pulcherrima (Dwarf Poinciana) Size/Shape
    Caesalpinia pulcherrima (Dwarf Poinciana) The dwarf Poinciana is a fast growing large shrub or small tree Leaves are bright green bi-pinnate feathery. Flowers are very showy yellow and orange in the middle appearing throughout the year. The fruits are pod. Makes a good specimen and used as barrier. All plant parts are poisonous. Grows well in drained sandy soil and needs full sun. Landscape Information French Name: Césalpinie la plus belle, Petit Flamboyant Pronounciation: sez-al-PIN-ee-uh pul-KAIR- ih-muh Plant Type: Shrub Origin: South America Heat Zones: 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Hardiness Zones: 9, 10, 11, 12 Uses: Specimen, Border Plant, Container, Windbreak, Reclamation Size/Shape Growth Rate: Fast Tree Shape: Round Plant Image Canopy Symmetry: Irregular Canopy Density: Medium Canopy Texture: Fine Height at Maturity: 3 to 5 m Spread at Maturity: 1.5 to 3 meters Time to Ultimate Height: 5 to 10 Years Caesalpinia pulcherrima (Dwarf Poinciana) Botanical Description Foliage Leaf Arrangement: Opposite Leaf Venation: Pinnate Leaf Persistance: Evergreen Leaf Type: Bipinnately compound Leaf Blade: Less than 5 Leaf Shape: Oblong Leaf Margins: Entire Leaf Textures: Rough Leaf Scent: No Fragance Color(growing season): Green Color(changing season): Green Flower Image Flower Flower Showiness: True Flower Size Range: 3 - 7 Flower Type: Raceme Flower Sexuality: Monoecious (Bisexual) Flower Scent: No Fragance Flower Color: Yellow Seasons: Year Round Trunk Trunk Susceptibility to Breakage: Suspected to breakage Number of Trunks: Multi-Trunked,
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Guidelines
    Town of Paradise Valley Landscape Guidelines September 26, 1996 P:\PLANDEPT\MISC\PRIDEPRJ\LANDGUID.DOC TOWN OF PARADISE VALLEY LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES The following landscape planting guidelines were accepted by the Paradise Valley Town Council on September 26, 1996, to provide guidance to public and private property owners alike in the preservation and enhancement of the community’s natural environment. The Town Council has directed the Town Staff to provide these guidelines to applicants for land division approval, special use permits, and building permits. The Council also directs that Staff utilize these landscaping guidelines for all Town projects. GOAL: Tree-shaded streets and paths throughout the Town which enhance the natural desert, soften the impression given by the hard surfaces of the streets, and shield residents, homes and passersby from heat, pollution, and traffic; and to create ample massings of plantings to offset harmful pollutants and provide additional storage of carbon, greater production of oxygen and more efficient mitigation of air pollution. LANDSCAPING 1. Planting of canopy trees in new developments, as well as along existing streets, should be required at a minimum of 30 foot intervals in the rights of way along the street, between the edge of the pavement and the adjacent path, between the path and the adjacent property line, or between the pavement and the adjacent property. Ironwood trees should make up at least 20 percent of such plantings. Similar plantings of shrubs at a minimum of 20 foot intervals should also be required. Tables #1 and #2 are partial, but representative, lists of indigenous and compatible trees.
    [Show full text]