Regulation 20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regulation 20 Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission Regulation Number 20 The Arkansas Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Code Effective Date: September 26, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART/SECTION PAGE SUBCHAPTER A C GENERAL.......................................................................................... 700-1 PART 700 C GENERAL....................................................................................................... 700-1 700.1 TITLE AND SCOPE ........................................................................... 700-1 700.2 OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................ 700-2 700.5 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................... 700-2 700.10 APPLICABILITY................................................................................ 700-5 700.11 RULEMAKING INITIATED BY THE COMMISSION.................... 700-6 700.12 PETITIONS TO INITIATE RULEMAKING ..................................... 700-7 700.13 NOTICE OF CITIZEN SUITS ............................................................ 700-8 700.14 AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS........................................................ 700-9 700.15 COMPUTATION OF TIME................................................................ 700-9 700.16 EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ............................................................ 700-10 PART 701 C STATE PROGRAM ....................................................................................... 701-1 701.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................. 701-1 701.2 OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................ 701-1 701.5 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................... 701-2 701.11 APPLICABILITY.............................................................................. 701-14 PART 702 C EXEMPTION FOR COAL EXTRACTION INCIDENTAL TO THE EXTRACTION OF OTHER MINERALS.............................................................. 702-1 702.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................. 702-1 702.5 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................... 702-1 702.11 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES............... 702-2 702.12 CONTENTS OF APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION....................... 702-4 702.13 PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION............................... 702-5 702.14 REQUIREMENTS FOR EXEMPTION.............................................. 702-6 702.15 CONDITIONS OF EXEMPTION AND RIGHT OF INSPECTION AND ENTRY....................................................................................... 702-7 702.16 STOCKPILING OF MINERALS........................................................ 702-7 702.17 REVOCATION AND ENFORCEMENT ........................................... 702-9 702.18 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ..................................................... 702-10 PART 705 C RESTRICTIONS ON FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................. 705-1 705.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................. 705-1 705.2 OBJECTIVES...................................................................................... 705-1 705.4 RESPONSIBILITY.............................................................................. 705-2 705.5 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................... 705-3 705.6 PENALTIES ........................................................................................ 705-3 705.11 WHO SHALL FILE............................................................................. 705-4 i 705.13 WHEN TO FILE.................................................................................. 705-5 705.15 WHERE TO FILE................................................................................ 705-5 705.17 WHAT TO REPORT........................................................................... 705-6 705.18 GIFTS AND GRATUITIES ................................................................ 705-8 705.19 RESOLVING PROHIBITED INTERESTS ........................................ 705-8 705.21 APPEALS PROCEDURES ................................................................. 705-9 PART 707 C EXEMPTION FOR COAL EXTRACTION INCIDENT TO GOVERNMENT C FINANCED HIGHWAY OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION................................... 707-1 707.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................. 707-1 707.4 RESPONSIBILITY.............................................................................. 707-1 707.5 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................... 707-1 707.11 APPLICABILITY................................................................................ 707-2 707.12 INFORMATION TO BE MAINTAINED ON SITE .......................... 707-2 SUBCHAPTER F C AREAS UNSUITABLE FOR MINING ........................................... 760-1 PART 760 C GENERAL....................................................................................................... 760-1 760.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................. 760-1 760.2 OBJECTIVES...................................................................................... 760-1 PART 761 C AREAS DESIGNATED BY ACT OF CONGRESS .................................... 761-1 761.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................. 761-1 761.2 OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................ 761-1 761.3 AUTHORITY ...................................................................................... 761-1 761.4 RESPONSIBILITY.............................................................................. 761-2 761.5 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................... 761-2 761.11 AREAS WHERE SURFACE COAL MINING OPERATIONS ARE PROHIBITED OR LIMITED..................................................... 761-5 761.12 EXCEPTION FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES................................. 761-7 761.13 PROCEDURES FOR COMPATIBILITY FINDINGS FOR SURFACE COAL MINING OPERATIONS ON FEDERAL LANDS IN NATIONAL FORESTS ................................................... 761-7 761.14 PROCEDURES FOR RELOCATING OR CLOSING A PUBLIC ROAD OR WAIVING THE PROHIBITION ON SURFACE COAL MINING OPERATIONS WITHIN THE BUFFER ZONE OF A PUBLIC ROAD ............................................. 761-8 761.15 PROCEDURES FOR WAIVING THE PROHIBITION ON SURFACE COAL MINING OPERATIONS WITHIN THE BUFFER ZONE OF AN OCCUPIED DWELLING .................. 761-9 761.16 SUBMISSION AND PROCESSING OF REQUESTS FOR VALID EXISTING RIGHTS DETERMINATIONS ................. 761-9 761.17 AREAS DESIGNATED BY ACT OF CONGRESS......................... 761-16 761.200 INTERPRETIVE RULE RELATED TO SUBSIDENCE ii DUE TO UNDERGROUND COAL MINING IN AREAS DESIGNATED BY ACT OF CONGRESS....................................... 761-18 PART 762 C CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATING AREAS AS UNSUITABLE FOR SURFACE COAL MINING OPERATIONS.............................................................................. 762-1 762.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................. 762-1 762.4 RESPONSIBILITY.............................................................................. 762-1 762.5 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................... 762-1 762.11 CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATING LANDS AS UNSUITABLE........ 762-2 762.12 ADDITIONAL CRITERIA ................................................................. 762-3 762.13 LAND EXEMPT FROM DESIGNATION AS UNSUITABLE FOR SURFACE COAL MINING OPERATIONS ............................. 762-3 762.14 APPLICABILITY TO LANDS DESIGNATED AS UNSUITABLE BY CONGRESS.................................................................................. 762-3 762.15 EXPLORATION ON LAND DESIGNATED AS UNSUITABLE FOR SURFACE COAL MINING OPERATIONS ............................. 762-4 PART 764 C STATE PROCESSES FOR DESIGNATING AREAS UNSUITABLE FOR SURFACE COAL OPERATIONS........................................................................... 764-1 764.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................. 764-1 764.2 OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................ 764-1 764.3 AUTHORITY ...................................................................................... 764-1 764.13 PROCEDURES: PETITIONS ............................................................. 764-2 764.15 PROCEDURES: INITIAL PROCESSING, RECORDKEEPING, AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS........................................ 764-4 764.17 PROCEDURES: HEARING REQUIREMENTS................................ 764-6 764.19 PROCEDURES: DECISION............................................................... 764-7 764.21 DATA BASE AND INVENTORY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS..... 764-7 764.23 PUBLIC INFORMATION .................................................................. 764-8 764.25 DIRECTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION ........ 764-8 SUBCHAPTER G
Recommended publications
  • The La Grange Mine Site Historical Lesson Plan Grade 7
    Teaching About Historic Places Lesson Plan Grade 7 The La Grange Mine: Changing the Landscape in the Quest for Gold Located on the slopes of the Trinity Mountains, the La Grange Mine serves as a silent reminder of what people will do in their quest for gold. Today, all that remains of this mine are some discarded things left by the miners. Only the scars on the land and the isolated items left behind can tell us the story of this once-great mine. The La Grange Mine story began in the late 1860s. It was during this time that the mountains west of Weaverville in Trinity County became a center for hydraulic gold mining. The gold found in this area was in such low amounts that special methods were needed to remove it from the ground. The method used was known as hydraulic mining. It involved washing the dirt with large amounts of water. In order to make sure that there was enough water for hydraulic mining to take place, in 1873 a group of local miners got together to form the Weaverville Ditch and Hydraulic Mining Company. This company was bought by Baron Ernest de La Grange for $250,000. Between 1893 and (Top photo shows La Grange Mine circa 1930s; Bottom photo shows the La Grange workers with gold 1915, the La Grange Mine became bars recovered from mine - California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Library, and Trinity County Historical Society Archives Photos.) the largest hydraulic mine in California. By the early 20th the La Grange Mine produced $3,500,000 worth of gold.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining's Toxic Legacy
    Mining’s Toxic Legacy An Initiative to Address Mining Toxins in the Sierra Nevada Acknowledgements _____________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Sierra Fund would like to thank Dr. Carrie Monohan, contributing author of this report, and Kyle Leach, lead technical advisor. Thanks as well to Dr. William M. Murphy, Dr. Dave Brown, and Professor Becky Damazo, RN, of California State University, Chico for their research into the human and environmental impacts of mining toxins, and to the graduate students who assisted them: Lowren C. McAmis and Melinda Montano, Gina Grayson, James Guichard, and Yvette Irons. Thanks to Malaika Bishop and Roberto Garcia for their hard work to engage community partners in this effort, and Terry Lowe and Anna Reynolds Trabucco for their editorial expertise. For production of this report we recognize Elizabeth “Izzy” Martin of The Sierra Fund for conceiving of and coordinating the overall Initiative and writing substantial portions of the document, Kerry Morse for editing, and Emily Rivenes for design and formatting. Many others were vital to the development of the report, especially the members of our Gold Ribbon Panel and our Government Science and Policy Advisors. We also thank the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment and The Abandoned Mine Alliance who provided funding to pay for a portion of the expenses in printing this report. Special thanks to Rebecca Solnit, whose article “Winged Mercury and
    [Show full text]
  • Pike Law Geology Report by Colin Fowler
    Geology of the Pike Law area. The Pike law mine site lies astride the Newbiggin to Westgate road, bounded on the east by Flushiemere beck and on the west by Westerbeck, with Broadley Hill at the NE corner being the highest point at 530m. Dunham describes the area: “The outcrop of the beds between the base of the Great Limestone and the Firestone on Pike Law, between Wester Beck and Flushiemere Beck, is traversed by a remarkable complex of veins.” (PP 243) Details of the geology have been given by Dunham, (1948 &1990); Bridges and Young, (2007); Bevins et al, (2010). Geological Survey of England and Wales 1:63,360/1:50,000 geological map series, New Series, sheet 25, Alston. The area has been worked by shaft, adit and hush, with 3 named areas of hush to the East of the road, Leonard’s Hush; Pikelaw Hush and Flask Hushes. To the West of the road, West End Hushes. There are a complex of leats and old dams forming reservoirs on both sides of the road, though non of them seem to have been able to hold sufficient water to enable hydraulic flushing alone to have created the hushes that we see. It is most likely to have been quarried and the water used for washing the mineral. “The production of lead concentrates from 1852 to 1891, when all work ceased was only 1725 tons.” (Dunham) “Surface evidence suggests that the area had been heavily worked prior to 1852, and what is recorded is the last gleanings of an old mining field” (Fairburn, A 2009) The figure given in Dunham may be optimistic, J.
    [Show full text]
  • 93 Placer Tailings Are Features on the Historic-Period Mining Landscape
    PAPERS ON HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 93 GGGOLDOLDOLD IN THETHETHE TAILINGSAILINGSAILINGS MICHAEL DAVID NEWLAND Recent field research of post-Gold Rush placer-mining operations along the Feather River suggests that placer tailings, the cleaned and processed rock and sediment waste of placer-mining operations, can contain important information about mining technique and landscape reconstruction. In addition, careful reconstruction of mining events can tie early mining claims with their mining operations. Two placer-mining sites, Spring Valley Gulch, worked in the 1860s-1870s, and the McCabe Creek Complex, worked in 1853-1860, both studied as part of the Oroville Relicensing Project, will be used as illustrations. lacer tailings are features on the historic-period mining landscape These three questions can be addressed using two sites as case that are typically ignored or recorded minimally, because studies: the Spring Valley Gulch complex and the McCabe Creek Presearchers think that either there is no information potential complex. there, or such features are too complex to address during field study. Placer tailings are found throughout the gold country of the west, and indeed around the world. Tailings are the bi-product of mining: the TWO CASE STUDIES: SPRING VALLEY GULCH AND MCCABE CREEK scraped, washed, or otherwise processed boulders, cobbles, and finer sediments left as a end result of mining; this paper focuses only on Spring Valley Gulch (CA-BUT-1872/H) placer mining and not on other forms of gold extraction. Spring Valley Gulch is filled with mining sites dating to the A lot has been said about tailings over the past two decades, and 1860s-1870s.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Mining Complex
    Ah Heng Mining Complex A Malheur National Forest Virtual Tour Introduction: Types of Gold Mining Placer vs. Hard Rock (Quartz, Load) Mining There are several different ways to mine for gold. The following is a brief description of placer and hard rock mining. The remainder of this virtual tour focuses on the placer mining done by the Ah Heng Company at a leased mining claim near Big Creek. Placer Mining- using water to excavate, transport, and recover Hard Rock Mining- the underground excavation of lode deposits. A heavy minerals from alluvial deposits. These deposits consist of lode deposit is the original mineral occurrence within a fissure minerals that have eroded from their parent lode into a variety through native rock, also known as a vein or ledge. In order to access of natural contexts among the sedimentary formations. Placer these minerals, miners must excavate either a decline (ramp), vertical deposits are generally free from parent material and do not shaft, or an adit. These type of claims were a longer term investment require additional refinement when they are separated from because of the additional labor and equipment needed to extract the other sediments. and refine the ore and the need for transportation infrastructure to ship the refined ore to smelting facilities. Placer Mining 2. After gold was discovered through prospecting, more complex equipment and Technology techniques were employed to recover gold buried in the alluvial deposits Rocker – Long Toms a rocking box and Sluice which Boxes- allowed Trough-like recovery of 1. The first step in placer mining is boxes with gold with prospecting for rich gold deposits, usually water small flowing over with shovel, pick and .
    [Show full text]
  • Mines of El Dorado County
    by Doug Noble © 2002 Definitions Of Mining Terms:.........................................3 Burt Valley Mine............................................................13 Adams Gulch Mine........................................................4 Butler Pit........................................................................13 Agara Mine ...................................................................4 Calaveras Mine.............................................................13 Alabaster Cave Mine ....................................................4 Caledonia Mine..............................................................13 Alderson Mine...............................................................4 California-Bangor Slate Company Mine ........................13 Alhambra Mine..............................................................4 California Consolidated (Ibid, Tapioca) Mine.................13 Allen Dredge.................................................................5 California Jack Mine......................................................13 Alveoro Mine.................................................................5 California Slate Quarry .................................................14 Amelia Mine...................................................................5 Camelback (Voss) Mine................................................14 Argonaut Mine ..............................................................5 Carrie Hale Mine............................................................14 Badger Hill Mine
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Control of Hydraulic Mining
    HYDRA ULIC MINING. FEDERAL CONTROL OF HYDRAULIC MINING. The question of the right and authority of the Federal Gov- ernment to control mining by the hydraulic process to any extent has recently become interesting and important, particularly in the State of California, by reason of the efforts recently made by the United States authorities to enjoin gravel mining there, until the miner shall have submitted to the jurisdiction of a commission composed of engineers of the United States army appointed by the President. Hydraulic mining, of itself, is and always has been recog- nized as a legitimate industry not subject to interference by the courts, except when it invaded the property rights of others. It may be-well to here observe, that hydraulic mining, as it is now and for more than thirty years last past has been conducted and understood in the mining regions of the western part of our country, is a process or mode of gold mining, by which hills, rocks, banks and other forms of deposits, composed largely of auriferous earth, are mined and removed from their position by means of large streams of water, which by great pressure are forced through pipes terminating in nozzles generally known as little giants or monitors. The water is discharged from these nozzles with great force against these bodies of earth, which are first frequently shattered or broken up by blasts of powder, and softened by streams of running water flowing at their base, loosening and tending to disintegrate them before they are fur- ther disintegrated and swept away by the great streams of water which are hurled upon them by the little giants or monitors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth Behind California's Gold Rush
    A Golden Myth: The Truth Behind California's Gold Rush Eric Rapps McGill University 2 The California Gold Rush of 1848 was one of the most transformational events in American history. In terms of America’s demographics, California became one of the most attractive destinations for Chinese, French, and Latin American immigrants, in addition to the 250,000 American migrants who moved there in search of gold.1 The abundance of gold in California and the economic contribution that gold mining made to the American economy in the second half of the nineteenth century were the main reasons why California earned statehood after only three years as a territory.2 From a social history perspective, Californians developed an identity based on materialism because their sole motivation for moving out west had been to get rich off of gold—the ultimate symbol of wealth.3 However, popular romanticism of the Gold Rush overlooks the environmental impacts of the event. Not only did the hydraulic mining associated with the Gold Rush destroy some of California’s most important water sources, but the mining and dredging that went along with it led to the deforestation of significant portions of California’s landscape as well. While it seemed that America’s major corporations at the time were willing to sacrifice the environment for financial gain, the Southern Pacific Transportation Company played an important role in promoting environmental regulations. It was largely thanks to their activism that the federal government adopted legislation to preserve sites like Yosemite, Sequoia, and the Sierra National Forest, which successfully prevented mining companies from further damaging California’s landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Abandoned Mines
    California’s Abandoned Mines A Report on the Magnitude and Scope of the Issue in the State Volume I Department of Conservation Office of Mine Reclamation Abandoned Mine Lands Unit June, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS: VOLUME I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................... 5 PREPARERS OF THIS REPORT ....................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 7 OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................................... 7 KEY FINDINGS .................................................................................................................... 8 OTHER STATE AND FEDERAL AML PROGRAMS ...................................................................... 8 OPTIONS............................................................................................................................. 8 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................11 CALIFORNIA'S MINING HISTORY .......................................................................................... 12 Metallic Mining........................................................................................................... 14 Non-Metallic Mining..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Tools
    METHODS AND TOOLS ESTIMATING MERCURY USE AND DOCUMENTING PRACTICES IN ARTISANAL AND SMALL-SCALE GOLD MINING (ASGM) © 2017 AGC Your text here Estimating Mercury Use and Documenting Practices in Artisanal and Small-scale Gold Mining (ASGM) Methods and Tools Version 1.0 An Artisanal Gold Council (AGC) document produced in conjunction with the UN Environment Global Mercury Partnership This publication should be cited as follows: O’Neill, J. D. and Telmer, K. (2017). Estimating Mercury Use and Documenting Practices in Artisanal and Small-scale Gold Mining (ASGM). Geneva, Switzerland: UN Environment. ISBN 978-0-9939459-8-4. Estimating Mercury Use in Artisanal and Small-scale Gold Mining Table of Contents FOREWARD Who is this toolkit for? . i How does this toolkit contribute to the National Action Plan? . .i How is this toolkit organized? . iv What will be accomplished with this toolkit? . v How to use this toolkit . v Challenges . vi Skills, people, and resources required for ASGM baseline research vi. Other Reference Documents . vii CHAPTER 1 – ASGM SECTOR AND BASELINE COMPREHENSION 1 .Introduction to ASGM . 1 1 .1 . What is ASGM? . 1 1 .2 . Where Does ASGM Occur? . 2 1 .3 . Gold . 3 1 .3 .1 . Gold Deposits . 3 1 .3 .2 . Ore Grade . 4 1 .3 .3 . Gold Purity . 5 1 .4 . Extraction: Mining Ore . 6 1 .4 .1 . Types of Mineral Deposits . 6 1 .4 .2 . Extraction Units . 7 1 .4 .3 . Extraction Equipment . 8 1 .4 .4 . Organization of Extraction Workers . 9 1 .5 . Transport: Linking Extraction and Processing . 9 1 .6 . Processing: Liberating Gold from Ore .
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduc on to the Mining Industry
    1. Introducon to the Mining Industry Unit 1.1 - Introduction to Mining Sector Unit 1.2 - Basic knowledge about Mining Unit 1.3 - Mining Equipments Unit 1.4- Duties and Responsibilities of a Mine Welder Parcipant Handbook Key Learning Outcomes At the end of this module, you will be able to: 1. Explain the key features of the Indian mining sector 2. Discuss various mining methods 3. Discuss the various phases and types of mining 4. List the various mining equipment and the precauons necessary to use them 5. Explain some basic electrical concepts 6. List the dues, responsibilies and key competencies of a Mine Welder 2 Mine Welder UNIT 1.1: Introducon to Mining Sector Unit Objecves At the end of this unit, you will be able to: 1. Describe the mining industry in India 2. Describe the growth expected in the mining industry 3. Explain the various kinds of minerals available in various parts of India 4. Describe the key workforce requirement in the mining sector 5. List various mining acts, legislaon and key bodies in India 1.1.1 The Mining Industry Minerals are valuable natural resources. They are available in limited quanes on Earth. They provide the raw materials for many basic industries and are a major resource for our development. Mining and mineral extracon in India go back to ancient mes. The wide availability of the minerals in India in the form of abundant rich reserves made it very conducive for the growth and development of the mining sector in India. The following shows mining operaons in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Mine. This Handbook
    Conservation Practices for the Reclamation of Surface Mines in Arkansas By James F. Stephens, P.G. Robert S. Rogers, P.G. and Phillip K. Fields, P.G. March 30, 2001 Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Surface Mining and Reclamation Division 8001 National Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Disclaimer: The thoughts and ideas expressed in this publication are intended to further research and development in this field. The Conservation Practices presented are not to be considered to be the only viable options. New technology is constantly providing new approaches to the problems associated with the prevention of non-point source pollution at surface mining operations. The State of Arkansas and the Department of Environmental Quality make no express or implied warranty concerning the thoughts and ideas expressed herein, should they fail to work as planned if utilized. Further the State of Arkansas and the Department of Environmental Quality make no warranty that the thoughts and ideas expressed herein are adequate for the reader’s purposes in general or for the reader’s compliance with local, state, or federal laws and regulations concerning surface mining operations. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the government of Arkansas. Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Richard A. Weiss - Interim Director Surface Mining and Reclamation Division James F. Stephens, P.G. - Chief Front Cover: Cover photographs are U.S. Vanadium’s Christy Mine located in Hot Spring County, Arkansas taken before and after final reclamation. In 1998 this site won the first place award for outstanding non-coal reclamation from the Interstate Mining Compact Commission in a nation- wide competition among member states.
    [Show full text]