Film LIVES Heresm
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Before the Forties
Before The Forties director title genre year major cast USA Browning, Tod Freaks HORROR 1932 Wallace Ford Capra, Frank Lady for a day DRAMA 1933 May Robson, Warren William Capra, Frank Mr. Smith Goes to Washington DRAMA 1939 James Stewart Chaplin, Charlie Modern Times (the tramp) COMEDY 1936 Charlie Chaplin Chaplin, Charlie City Lights (the tramp) DRAMA 1931 Charlie Chaplin Chaplin, Charlie Gold Rush( the tramp ) COMEDY 1925 Charlie Chaplin Dwann, Alan Heidi FAMILY 1937 Shirley Temple Fleming, Victor The Wizard of Oz MUSICAL 1939 Judy Garland Fleming, Victor Gone With the Wind EPIC 1939 Clark Gable, Vivien Leigh Ford, John Stagecoach WESTERN 1939 John Wayne Griffith, D.W. Intolerance DRAMA 1916 Mae Marsh Griffith, D.W. Birth of a Nation DRAMA 1915 Lillian Gish Hathaway, Henry Peter Ibbetson DRAMA 1935 Gary Cooper Hawks, Howard Bringing Up Baby COMEDY 1938 Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant Lloyd, Frank Mutiny on the Bounty ADVENTURE 1935 Charles Laughton, Clark Gable Lubitsch, Ernst Ninotchka COMEDY 1935 Greta Garbo, Melvin Douglas Mamoulian, Rouben Queen Christina HISTORICAL DRAMA 1933 Greta Garbo, John Gilbert McCarey, Leo Duck Soup COMEDY 1939 Marx Brothers Newmeyer, Fred Safety Last COMEDY 1923 Buster Keaton Shoedsack, Ernest The Most Dangerous Game ADVENTURE 1933 Leslie Banks, Fay Wray Shoedsack, Ernest King Kong ADVENTURE 1933 Fay Wray Stahl, John M. Imitation of Life DRAMA 1933 Claudette Colbert, Warren Williams Van Dyke, W.S. Tarzan, the Ape Man ADVENTURE 1923 Johnny Weissmuller, Maureen O'Sullivan Wood, Sam A Night at the Opera COMEDY -
International Casting Directors Network Index
International Casting Directors Network Index 01 Welcome 02 About the ICDN 04 Index of Profiles 06 Profiles of Casting Directors 76 About European Film Promotion 78 Imprint 79 ICDN Membership Application form Gut instinct and hours of research “A great film can feel a lot like a fantastic dinner party. Actors mingle and clash in the best possible lighting, and conversation is fraught with wit and emotion. The director usually gets the bulk of the credit. But before he or she can play the consummate host, someone must carefully select the right guests, send out the invites, and keep track of the RSVPs”. ‘OSCARS: The Role Of Casting Director’ by Monica Corcoran Harel, The Deadline Team, December 6, 2012 Playing one of the key roles in creating that successful “dinner” is the Casting Director, but someone who is often over-looked in the recognition department. Everyone sees the actor at work, but very few people see the hours of research, the intrinsic skills, the gut instinct that the Casting Director puts into finding just the right person for just the right role. It’s a mix of routine and inspiration which brings the characters we come to love, and sometimes to hate, to the big screen. The Casting Director’s delicate work as liaison between director, actors, their agent/manager and the studio/network figures prominently in decisions which can make or break a project. It’s a job that can't garner an Oscar, but its mighty importance is always felt behind the scenes. In July 2013, the Academy of Motion Pictures of Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) created a new branch for Casting Directors, and we are thrilled that a number of members of the International Casting Directors Network are amongst the first Casting Directors invited into the Academy. -
December 2014 ONECELEBRATEWITHUS Join the Celebration As We Usher in a New Year of Cinema in Iowa City
A COLLABORATION WITH DEC FilmScene Staff THE EYE OPENER 12-21 Joe Tiefenthaler, Executive Director Andy Brodie, Program Director Complete info at www.icfilmscene.org/flam Andrew Sherburne, Sunday, December 14th Associate Director A curated week of new releases and restored classics on literature, art and music. Tickets: $35 for non-members / $25 for members / Emily Salmonson, Series Pass: $30 non-members / $20 members. Regular price for individual shows. $15 for supporting role and leading role members Director of Operations / FREE for Founders Circle and Screen Legend Ross Meyer, Head Projectionist and Facilities Manager Join FilmScene in celebrating the one year Dan DeMarco, Theater Staff anniversary of the opening of our downtown Jon Graf, Theater Staff Aaron Holmgren, Theater Staff cinema with a delicious brunch of chicken & DIALOGUE: Director Q&A NEWLY RESTORED! NEWLY RESTORED! waffles, scrambled eggs with local cheeses, Phil Ochs, Theater Staff MUSIC OF THE BURROUGHS: ROME, OPEN CITY Tony Pomales, Theater Staff beignets, mini donuts, mimosas and a cash MOMENT THE MOVIE (1983) (2014) Dir. Roberto Emily Brown, Projectionist bar. While you eat, be entertained by music (2014) Dir. Kevin Wisor. Dir. Howard Brookner. Rossellini. Legendary Kelly Gallagher, Projectionist from the films of our first year and the Iowa A locally-made feature The first and only doc Italian drama about the Kasia Plazinska, Projectionist premiere of an acclaimed short film. doc exploring the art of made with the Nazi occupation of Board of Directors improvised music, shot full participation of writer Rome and the brave few Michael Finlayson, Chair FILMFOODDRINKSMUSIC in Iowa City. William S. -
Scene and Heard: a Profile of Laura Colella
Scene and Heard: A Profile of Laura Colella She sits quietly in a coffee shop, waiting. She is of small stature, and fine boned. She has striking eyes and a beautiful face, one that easily could be in front of the camera. Providence born and raised, no one she knew ever talked about becoming a filmmaker. She is definitely under the radar – but is soaring very high. This is Laura Colella. In her 44 years, she has managed to impress some very important people in the film world. One of those folks is Paul Thomas Anderson – the same Paul Thomas Anderson who wrote and directed The Master, There Will Be Blood, Boogie Nights and my personal favorite (and I believe his), Magnolia. Last February, he hosted a screening of her film Breakfast with Curtis in LA, and held a lengthy Q & A session afterward. In the same month, at the Independent Spirit Awards, the film was nominated for the John Cassavetes Award for Best Feature made for under $500,000, and won a $50,000 distribution grant from Jameson. Her love of film started early. She grew up heavily involved in theater, was in a few productions at Trinity Rep, and worked there as a production assistant. “My first year in college at Harvard, my boyfriend took me to the end-of-year film screenings at RISD, which opened up that world of possibility for me. I discovered the excellent film department at Harvard, which centered on 16MM production, became totally immersed in it, and never looked back.” Laura now has three features under her belt – Tax Day, her first, for which she received a special equipment grant through the Sundance Institute, portrays two women on their way to the post office on that dreaded day, April 15. -
Sight & Sound Films of 2007
Sight & Sound Films of 2007 Each year we ask a selection of our contributors - reviewers and critics from around the world - for their five films of the year. It's a very loosely policed subjective selection, based on films the writer has seen and enjoyed that year, and we don't deny them the choice of films that haven't yet reached the UK. And we don't give them much time to ponder, either - just about a week. So below you'll find the familiar and the obscure, the new and the old. From this we put together the top ten you see here. What distinguishes this particular list is that it's been drawn up from one of the best years for all-round quality I can remember. 2007 has seen some extraordinary films. So all of the films in the ten are must-sees and so are many more. Enjoy. - Nick James, Editor. 1 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days (Cristian Mungiu) 2 Inland Empire (David Lynch) 3 Zodiac (David Fincher) = 4 I’m Not There (Todd Haynes) The Lives of Others (Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck) 6 Silent Light (Carlos Reygadas) = 7 The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (Andrew Dominik) Syndromes and a Century (Apichatpong Weerasethakul) No Country for Old Men (Ethan and Joel Coen) Eastern Promises (David Cronenberg) 1 Table of Contents – alphabetical by critic Gilbert Adair (Critic and author, UK)............................................................................................4 Kaleem Aftab (Critic, The Independent, UK)...............................................................................4 Geoff Andrew (Critic -
Configuring a Scatological Gaze in Trash Filmmaking Zoe Gross
Excremental Ecstasy, Divine Defecation and Revolting Reception: Configuring a Scatological Gaze in Trash Filmmaking Zoe Gross Scatology, for all the sordid formidability the term evokes, is not an es- pecially novel or unusual theme, stylistic technique or descriptor in film or filmic reception. Shit happens – to emphasise both the banality and perva- siveness of the cliché itself – on multiple levels of textuality, manifesting it- self in both the content and aesthetic of cinematic texts, and the ways we respond to them. We often refer to “shit films,” using an excremental vo- cabulary redolent of detritus, malaise and uncleanliness to denote their otherness and “badness”. That is, films of questionable taste, aesthetics, or value, are frequently delineated and defined by the defecatory: we describe them as “trash”, “crap”, “filth”, “sewerage”, “shithouse”. When considering cinematic purviews such as the b-film, exploitation, and shock or trash filmmaking, whose narratives are so often played out on the site of the gro- tesque body, a screenscape spectacularly splattered with bodily excess and waste is de rigeur. Here, the scatological is both often on blatant dis- play – shit is ejected, consumed, smeared, slung – and underpining or tinc- turing form and style, imbuing the text with a “shitty” aesthetic. In these kinds of films – which, as their various appellations tend to suggest, are de- fined themselves by their association with marginality, excess and trash, the underground, and the illicit – the abject body and its excretia not only act as a dominant visual landscape, but provide a kind of somatic, faecal COLLOQUY text theory critique 18 (2009). -
“Laboratório” De T V Digital Usando Softw Are Open Source
“Laboratório” de TV digital usando software open source Objectivos Realizar uma pesquisa de software Open Source, nomeadamente o que está disponível em Sourceforge.net relacionado com a implementação de operações de processamento de sinais audiovisuais que tipicamente existem em sistemas de produção de TV digital. Devem ser identificadas aplicações para: • aquisição de vídeo, som e imagem • codificação com diferentes formatos (MPEG-2, MPEG-4, JPEG, etc.) • conversão entre formatos • pré e pós processamento (tal como filtragens) • edição • anotação Instalação dos programas e teste das suas funcionalidades. Linux Aquisição Filtros Codificação :: VLC :: Xine :: Ffmpeg :: Kino (DV) :: VLC :: Transcode :: Tvtime Television Viewer (TV) :: Video4Linux Grab Edição :: Mpeg4IP :: Kino (DV) Conversão :: Jashaka :: Kino :: Cinelerra :: VLC Playback :: Freej :: VLC :: FFMpeg :: Effectv :: MJPEG Tools :: PlayerYUV :: Lives :: Videometer :: MPlayer Anotação :: Xmovie :: Agtoolkit :: Video Squirrel VLC (VideoLan Client) VLC - the cross-platform media player and streaming server. VLC media player is a highly portable multimedia player for various audio and video formats (MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, mp3, ogg, ...) as well as DVDs, VCDs, and various streaming protocols. It can also be used as a server to stream in unicast or multicast in IPv4 or IPv6 on a high-bandwidth network. http://www.videolan.org/ Kino (DV) Kino is a non-linear DV editor for GNU/Linux. It features excellent integration with IEEE-1394 for capture, VTR control, and recording back to the camera. It captures video to disk in Raw DV and AVI format, in both type-1 DV and type-2 DV (separate audio stream) encodings. http://www.kinodv.org/ Tvtime Television Viewer (TV) Tvtime is a high quality television application for use with video capture cards on Linux systems. -
Post-Postmodern Cinema at the Turn of the Millennium: Paul Thomas Anderson’S Magnolia
Revista de Estudios Norteamericanos, vol. 24, 2020. Seville, Spain, ISSN 1133-309-X, pp. 1-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/REN.2020.i24.01 POST-POSTMODERN CINEMA AT THE TURN OF THE MILLENNIUM: PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON’S MAGNOLIA JESÚS BOLAÑO QUINTERO Universidad de Cádiz [email protected] Received: 20 May 2020 Accepted: 26 July 2020 KEYWORDS Magnolia; Paul Thomas Anderson; post-postmodern cinema; New Sincerity; French New Wave; Jean-Luc Godard; Vivre sa Vie PALABRAS CLAVE Magnolia; Paul Thomas Anderson; cine post-postmoderno; Nueva Sinceridad; Nouvelle Vague; Jean-Luc Godard; Vivir su vida ABSTRACT Starting with an analysis of the significance of the French New Wave for postmodern cinema, this essay sets out to make a study of Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia (1999) as the film that marks the beginning of what could be considered a paradigm shift in American cinema at the end of the 20th century. Building from the much- debated passing of postmodernism, this study focuses on several key postmodern aspects that take a different slant in this movie. The film points out the value of aspects that had lost their meaning within the fiction typical of postmodernism—such as the absence of causality; sincere honesty as opposed to destructive irony; or the loss of faith in Lyotardian meta-narratives. We shall look at the nature of the paradigm shift to link it to the desire to overcome postmodern values through a recovery of Romantic ideas. RESUMEN Partiendo de un análisis del significado de la Nouvelle Vague para el cine postmoderno, este trabajo presenta un estudio de Magnolia (1999), de Paul Thomas Anderson, como obra sobre la que pivota lo que se podría tratar como un cambio de paradigma en el cine estadounidense de finales del siglo XX. -
Directed By: Josephine Decker Written By: Sarah Gubbins Starring: Elisabeth Moss, Odessa Young, Michael Stuhlbarg, Logan Lerman
SHIRLEY Directed by: Josephine Decker Written by: Sarah Gubbins Starring: Elisabeth Moss, Odessa Young, Michael Stuhlbarg, Logan Lerman Running Time: 107 Minutes CORNERSTONE FILMS CONTACTS: Publicity: Anna Bohlin/ [email protected] Marketing: Joanne Michael/ [email protected] SYNPOSIS Fred and Rose move to a small Vermont college town in pursuit of a job for Fred as an assistant professor of literature. The young couple receives an offer for free room and board from professor Stanley Hyman, as long as Rose agrees to spend time cleaning up the home and looking after his wife, acclaimed horror author Shirley Jackson. At first Fred and Rose detest the rocky household of the eccentric couple, but they eventually establish deep bonds with their counterparts, which will test the limits of their young love. Director Josephine Decker makes an exciting return with a biographical portrait brought alive with energy and imagination, based on a novel by Susan Merrill and screenplay by Sarah Gubbins. Shirley is a fresh take on the period drama, full of contemporary intrigue and dynamic in style. It features a stellar lead cast—Elisabeth Moss, Michael Stuhlbarg, Odessa Young, and Logan Lerman—who all return to the Festival to give another memorable performance. DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT Shirley Jackson was a wildly unorthodox human and storyteller. Encountering her work was like finding a map towards becoming the kind of artist I would like to be. Daring. Intimate. Structured yet dreamlike. Shirley’s work rides on the skin between imagined and real, seducing with its oddness and humble cracks until you can’t tell if you’re looking up the stairwell or into your own mouth. -
La Coalescencia Literario-Cine
Publicado en: Lourdes Carriedo, Mª Dolores Picazo y Mª Luisa Guerrero (eds.), Entre escritura e imagen. Lecturas de narrativa contemporánea. Bruselas, Peter Lang, pp. 245-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6392-3 ISBN: 978-3-0352-6392-3 La coalescencia literario-cinematográfica en la obra de Marguerite Duras Lourdes Monterrubio Ibáñez Universidad Complutense de Madrid El trabajo de Marguerite Duras, único en la creación de un espacio literario- cinematográfico nuevo, fértil e inabarcable en sus múltiples posibilidades, genera una nueva materia literario-cinematográfica a la que hace referencia el título de este artículo, donde el texto literario escribe con la imagen. En uno de los textos recogidos en Les Yeux verts, y hablando sobre Aurélia Steiner (1979), uno de los colaboradores de Cahiers du cinéma se expresa en los siguientes términos a propósito de cómo la voz, la voz de Duras, va creando el personaje de Aurélia: Le terme qui conviendrait mieux serait peut-être coalescence, osmose. On imagine mal que quelqu’un d’autre puisse dire ce texte. Tu étais Aurélia Steiner en même temps que tu l’écrivais et que tu le lisais. Tu es Aurélia Steiner. On ne pense pas : c’est Marguerite Duras. Je ne vois pas quelqu’un d’autre que toi pouvant proférer ce texte. C’est peut-être un leurre (Duras, 1996: 151). Ósmosis y coalescencia, estos son los términos a partir de los cuales desarrollaremos la definición y caracterización de la obra literario-cinematográfica de Marguerite Duras. La definición de la Real Academia Española de la Lengua de ambos términos es la siguiente: Ósmosis: 1. -
The Domestic Is Not Free, Nov 2—10, Spotlighting the Ways Women Have Created, Challenged, and Subverted Domesticity
BAM presents Women at Work: The Domestic Is Not Free, Nov 2—10, spotlighting the ways women have created, challenged, and subverted domesticity October 9, 2018/Brooklyn, NY—From Friday, November 2 through Saturday, November 10 BAM presents Women at Work: The Domestic Is Not Free, a wide-ranging series spotlighting the overlooked work women take on in the home as house-workers, caretakers, and familial partners. The Domestic Is Not Free is the third edition of the ongoing Women at Work series—following Women at Work: Labor Activism in March and Women at Work: Radical Creativity in August—and highlights the historically erased and undervalued physical and emotional labor women perform, often invisibly, every day. The series considers the myriad ways in which women around the world have challenged and subverted traditional associations between gender and domesticity. Exploring the intersections of labor, race, class, and social environment, these films embody human stories of sacrifice and endurance. BAM Cinema Department Coordinator and programmer of the series Natalie Erazo explains, “I learned early on to value the domestic space and appreciate the women around me who shaped it. I hope this series will encourage viewers to acknowledge the monotony and emotional bearing of a life often relegated to being behind the scenes.” The series opens with Ousmane Sembène’s seminal Black Girl (1966—Nov 2). Screening with short films Fannie’s Film (Woods, 1979) and Fucked Like a Star (Saintonge, 2018), these films depict black women in roles of domestic service while also giving audiences access to their inner thoughts, feelings, and struggles. -
Download This PDF File
Dominiek Hoens & Sigi Jöttkandt INTRODUCTION ‘Lacan is not all’1 xpressed with the simplicity of her elliptical put-down which we have adopted for our title for this special issue, Marguerite Duras’ attitude to- wards psychoanalysis was ambiguous to say the least.1 Frequently, when she speaks of psychoanalysis, she leaves us in no doubt of her very great Emistrust of it, her acute sense of being a stranger to its discourse. Yet, regarding the event that inspired these invitations to express her opinion on psychoanalysis – Jacques Lacan’s “Homage to Marguerite Duras, on Le Ravissement de Lol V. Stein,” – she is generally positive, at times even enthusiastic.2 Since its first appearance in 1965, Lacan’s sibylline essay has provoked a flood of commentaries and further explorations of the topics it alludes to: love, desire, femi- ninity, writing, among many others. Therefore, it seems natural to us to launch this issue with Jean-Michel Rabaté’s essay on The Ravishing of Lol V. Stein, the pivotal novel in Duras’ oeuvre and the text that originally sparked the Lacanian interest in Duras. In his candid contribution, Rabaté raises the issue of ravissement, starting from his question, “Why were we all in love with Marguerite Duras?” This ‘all,’ we discover, may first and foremost include Lacan, whose “Homage” entails an analy- sis of his own ravishment by Duras or, more precisely, by the unfolding triangles in Lol V. Stein that end up encompassing the reader. It is for this reason that, even as he pays careful, ‘academic’ attention to the ternaries inside, yet transgressing, the confines of the novel, Rabaté also cannot refrain from a ‘personal’ questioning of the triangle that was constituted by Duras, her work and himself, as he recalls in this intimate memoir recounting the remarkable times that they spent together in Dijon, and later, in Paris in the 1970s and 1980s.