Exoplanet Orbital Eccentricity: Multiplicity Relation and the Solar System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Exoplanet orbital eccentricity: Multiplicity relation and the Solar System Mary Anne Limbacha,b and Edwin L. Turnera,c,1 Departments of aAstrophysical Sciences and bMechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; and cThe Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 227-8568, Japan Edited by Neta A. Bahcall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved November 11, 2014 (received for review April 10, 2014) The known population of exoplanets exhibits a much wider range of The dataset is discussed in the next section. We then show the orbital eccentricities than Solar System planets and has a much higher trend in eccentricity with multiplicity and comment on possible average eccentricity. These facts have been widely interpreted to sources of error and bias. Next we measure the mean, median, indicate that the Solar System is an atypical member of the overall and probability density distribution of eccentricities for various population of planetary systems. We report here on a strong anti- multiplicities and fit them to a simple power-law model for correlation of orbital eccentricity with multiplicity (number of planets multiplicities greater than two. This fit is used to make a rough in the system) among cataloged radial velocity (RV) systems. The estimate of the number of higher-multiplicity systems likely to be mean, median, and rough distribution of eccentricities of Solar System contaminating the one- and two-planet system samples due to as planets fits an extrapolation of this anticorrelation to the eight-planet yet undiscovered members under plausible, but far from certain, case rather precisely despite the fact that no more than two Solar assumptions. Finally, we conclude with some discussion of the System planets would be detectable with RV data comparable to that implications of this result. in the exoplanet sample. Moreover, even if regarded as a single or double planetary system, the Solar System lies in a reasonably heavily The Dataset populated region of eccentricity−multiplicity space. Thus, the Solar Only RV exoplanet data obtained from exoplanet.org are used System is not anomalous among known exoplanetary systems with for this analysis. All of the RV exoplanets listed on the website respect to eccentricities when its multiplicity is taken into account. that have a measured eccentricity are included in the analysis. If Specifically, as the multiplicity of a system increases, the eccentricity the eccentricity of the planet was not listed or if it was given as decreases roughly as a power law of index –1.20. A simple and plau- zero, the exoplanet was excluded from our sample. Thirty-eight sible but ad hoc and model-dependent interpretation of this relation- systems were excluded on the latter basis, of which 29 had their ship implies that ∼80% of the one-planet and 25% of the two-planet eccentricity constrained to zero in the orbital fit. Table 1 lists the systems in our sample have additional, as yet undiscovered, members number of RV planets in each multiplicity bin. but that systems of higher observed multiplicity are largely complete The five- and six-planet systems, one of each, were combined (i.e., relatively rarely contain additional undiscovered planets). If low into one bin so that there was sufficient data for a statistical eccentricities indeed favor high multiplicities, habitability may be analysis. Note that the total number of planets with a given more common in systems with a larger number of planets. multiplicity is not necessarily a multiple of the multiplicity of the system because not all planets in some systems have measured orbital eccentricities | dynamical evolution | Solar System | radial velocity eccentricities. In the cases where a certain parameter of an exoplanet or exoplanet system is under debate, we used the olar System orbital eccentricities are unusually low compared exoplanet.org value. For instance, the multiplicity of a system Swith those of exoplanets. This fact is one of the most fre- may be three planets based on observations; however, the motion quently noted major surprises revealed by the discovery and early of those three planets may imply that there are additional explorations of the exoplanet population orbiting Sun-like stars companions, and therefore the multiplicity of the system may be and has been widely interpreted to indicate that the Solar System listed as four planets rather than three on exoplanet.org. In all is not a representative example of a planetary system (reviews by such cases, we simply adopt the data listed on the website for refs. 1–3 and references therein). Many planetary formation theories developed before the discovery of exoplanets suggested Significance planets would have eccentricities similar to the Solar System planets (4, 5). Several attempts have been made to accurately The Solar System planets have near-circular orbits (i.e., un- model the dynamical evolution of planetary systems since then, usually low eccentricity) compared with the known population with the goal of explaining the observed eccentricity distribution of exoplanets, planets that orbit stars other than the Sun. This (6–10). These papers invoke planet−planet interactions as the fact has been widely interpreted to indicate that the Solar primary mechanism determining the distribution of orbital ec- System is an atypical member of the overall population of centricities. The most recent of these papers (10) concludes that planetary systems. We find a strong anticorrelation of orbital there would be a dependence of eccentricity on multiplicity (the eccentricity with the number of planets (multiplicity) in a sys- number of planets in the system) in this scenario. We use existing tem that extrapolates nicely to the eight-planet, Solar System case despite the fact that no more than two Solar System radial velocity (RV) exoplanet data to test that prediction. planets would be detectable in the sample in which the anti- Our dataset consists of 403 of the 441 cataloged RV exoplanets correlation was discovered. Habitability may be more common obtained since the 1990s (exoplanet.org). Of these, 127 are in systems with a larger number of planets, which have lower members of known multiple-planet systems with multiplicities typical eccentricities. of up to six. The data are sufficient to allow an estimate of the relationship of eccentricity to multiplicity. It has been noted that Author contributions: M.A.L. and E.L.T. designed research; M.A.L. and E.L.T. performed eccentricity in two-planet systems tends to be lower than in research; M.A.L. analyzed data; and M.A.L. and E.L.T. wrote the paper. single-planet systems (11). This paper explores the relation at The authors declare no conflict of interest. higher multiplicities and notes its unexpected and surprising This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. consistency with the Solar System case. 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. 20–24 | PNAS | January 6, 2015 | vol. 112 | no. 1 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1406545111 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 Table 1. Number of planets in dataset for given multiplicity 8 planets 1 planet 2 planets 3 planets 4 planets 5/6 planets (SS) Total number of planets 1 Multiplicity (no. planets in system) with given multiplicity* 0.9 1 276 2810.8 325 4120.7 5or6 9 0.6 *This value is not necessarily a multiple of the system multiplicity since not all exoplanets have measured eccentricities. 0.5 Eccentricity 0.4 consistency. The data were taken from the website over the 0.3 course of several weeks in February and March 2014. We used RV data only for our analysis since the planets in that subset 0.2 of the dataset typically have known and relatively reliably measured eccentricities. 0.1 A Trend in Multiplicity Versus Eccentricity 0 10 2 100 102 10 2 100 102 10 2 100 102 10 2 100 102 10 2 100 102 10 2 100 102 Fig. 1 shows the cumulative eccentricity distribution function in Semi-major Axis (AU) exoplanet systems and the Solar System for systems of various Fig. 2. Eccentricity versus semimajor axis going from low (left) to high multiplicities. There is a clear trend toward lower eccentricities multiplicity (right). A red dot is shown for where Jupiter would appear on in higher-multiplicity systems. This trend is perhaps most no- the one- and two-planet distributions, and for Saturn on the two-planet ticeable in the top (high eccentricity) half of the plot. Fig. 2 distribution. This demonstrates that even if the Solar System were shows the eccentricity vs. semimajor axis relation at each mul- detected via RV as a one- or two-planet system, it would still be consistent tiplicity and also displays the strong tendency toward lower ec- with the data. centricity at higher multiplicity. The strength and nature of the anticorrelation of orbital ec- despite the fact that the RV data quality for the exoplanetary centricity with multiplicity is even more dramatically revealed systems would only allow the detection of Jupiter and perhaps by plotting the mean and median eccentricity as a function of Saturn. In other words, it would be more statistically consistent multiplicity, as shown in Fig. 3. Two features of this figure are to plot the Solar System point in these figures at a multiplicity of worthy of special note (i) The divergence of the one-planet one or two, as also shown in the figure. In either case, the Solar systems, and two-planet systems to a lesser extent, from what System does not appear to have unusually low orbital eccen- ASTRONOMY appears to be a power-law relation at higher multiplicities is tricities with respect to exoplanet systems, but rather the Solar noticeable in both the mean and median curves.