DOCSLIB.ORG

Cohesion Failure and Mitosis: from Molecular Mechanisms To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cohesion Failure and Mitosis: from Molecular Mechanisms To Cohesion failure and Mitosis: From Molecular Mechanisms to Organismal Consequences Mihailo Mirkovic Dissertation presented to obtain the PhD degree in Molecular Biology Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier | Universidade Nova de Lisboa Research work coordinated by: Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia Oeiras, May 2018 1 Table of Contents Declaration………………………………...….................................6 Declaração....................................................................................6 Summary.......................................................................................7 Resumo........................................................................................11 Acknowledgments........................................................................15 List of Publications.......................................................................17 Introduction: 1.0 General Introduction…………………………………........…...19 1.1 Cohesin-Molecular Glue and much more………...............22 1.1.1 The importance of gluing DNA molecules……….…..…..23 1.1.2 The Cohesin Cycle……………………………..…............34 A) The cohesin cycle: Chromatin Loading……..……...........34 B) The cohesin cycle: Cohesion establishment………........36 C) The cohesin cycle: Prophase and Cohesion retention at the centromere……………………………………………….....38 D) The cohesin cycle: The final cut……….…..……….…….41 1.1.3 Multiple-step cohesin removal…………….…….....42 1.1.4 Sister Chromatid Resolution………………..….......43 1.1.5 Inner-centromere defining platfor…………….…....51 1.1.6 Force Balance…………………………………….....53 1.1.7 Anaphase sharpness…………………………….….56 1.1.8 Concluding Remarks………………………….........57 2 1.2 The Guardians of Mitotic Fidelity……………………………70 1.3 Aneuploidy and its Consequences………………………….86 Results: Chapter I: Premature loss of cohesion and Mitosis………………….……100 I.1 Premature Loss of Sister Chromatid Cohesion Does Not Elicit a Robust SAC Response…………………………………………...…104 I.2 Loss of Sister Chromatid Cohesion Activates EC Mechanisms during Early Mitosis……………………………………………...…..107 I.3 Attachments of Single Chromatids to the Mitotic Spindle Are Progressively Stabilized……………………………………….…….113 I.4 Cyclin B Is Gradually Degraded during Cohesin Cleavage….119 I.5 Mathematical Modeling of Multiple Feedback across the Mitotic Network………………………………………………….…….…...…120 I.6 Cells with Premature Loss of Sister Chromatid Cohesion Are Ultrasensitive to Cdk1 Inhibition………………………………....…127 I.7 Discussion……………………………………………….…....…..131 I.8 Materials and Methods…………………………….……..……...132 3 Chapter II: Spindle Assembly Checkpoint aggravates cohesin defects in mitosis……………………………………………….………..….139 II.1 Drosophila wing modifier screen reveals that depletion of Mad2 and Mps1 suppresses the developmental defects associated with loss of cohesion………………………………………..…......…..141 II.2 SAC inactivation rescues chromosome segregation defects associated with loss of cohesion……………………….…........146 II.3 SAC inactivation suppresses chromosome shuffling after loss of cohesion…………………………………………………......…155 II.4 SAC inactivation restores cell survival after loss of cohesion……………………………………………….....…...…..163 II.5 Discussion………………………………………………....…165 II.6 Materials and Methods……………………………….…..…168 Chapter III: Cohesin loss and Aneuploidy in the developing fly………...180 III.1 A genetic system for acute and time-controlled generation of aneuploidy in a developing organism…………..………….......…183 III.2 Reversible removal of cohesin results in a single round of mitotic abnormalities and consequent aneuploidy…………........186 III.3 Larvae challenged with aneuploidy during development hatch into impaired adults…………………………………………….…...196 4 III.4 Aneuploidy results in chromosomal instability and chromosome accumulation in the Neuroblasts……………………….….....….199 III.5 Karyotype restrictions in the proliferating aneuploid Neuroblast population…………………………………………………….…….208 III.6 Aneuploidy elicits a stress response in the brain tissue.….210 III.7 Neural stemness delays aneuploidy stress response……..214 III.8 Developmental aneuploidy does not alter significantly adult brain size and shape………………………………………..…......217 III.9 Protecting only the developing brain from induced aneuploidy rescues the lifespan of the ecloded flies……………………...…219 III.10 Discussion…………………………………..…….…………222 III.11 Materials and Methods………………………………..……229 General Discussion……………………………….……….…….242 5 Declaration I declare that this dissertation and the data presented are the result of my own work, developed between 2014 and 2018 in the laboratory of Dr. Raquel Oliveira at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência in Oeiras, Portugal. Specific author contributions are indicated in each chapter, in the Acknowledgements section. Financial support was granted by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, doctoral fellowship PD/BD/52438/2013 and ERC Starting Grant (StG), LS3, ERC-2014-STG-638917, Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (MCCIG321883/CCC) and an EMBO Installation Grant (IG2778). Declaração Declaro que esta dissertação de doutoramento e os dados nela apresentados são o resultado do meu trabalho, desenvolvido entre 2014 e 2018 no laboratório do Dr.Raquel Oliveria no Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência em Oeiras, Portugal. As contribuições de cada autor são indicadas em cada capítulo na secção dos Agradecimentos/Acknowledgements.O apoio financeiro foi concedido pela Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, através da bolsa de doutorame nto PD/BD/52438/2013e porfundos do Conselho Europeu de Investigação ERC Starting Grant (StG), LS3, ERC-2014-STG-638917, Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (MCCIG321883/CCC), EMBO Installation Grant (IG2778). 6 Summary Mitosis is a dynamic culmination of the cell cycle, resulting in generation of two daughter cells from one mother. In order for this to happen, the cell must package its DNA into chromosomes and divide it equally amongst progeny. To ensure this process happens accurately, the cell glues identical chromosomes together so it can segregate them in symmetrical fashion during anaphase. The glue holding chromosomes together is a molecule called cohesin, which encompasses replicated DNA fibers via topological entrapment. The aim of this thesis was to study the immediate mitotic response to premature cohesion loss, as well as the long term consequences of such perturbed mitosis for the cell and the whole organism. In order to study cohesion loss in mitosis, we utilized an established acute system for cohesin depletion, via the use of TEV protease, which cleaves TEV sites inserted into cohesin within hours after heat shock induction, or minutes after injection. To study cohesion loss in the entire organism, we modified the existing TEV tool in D.melanogaster to include a cohesin rescue step, generating a transient cohesin loss, which would impair mitosis in a window time, while minimizing chronic damage to the organism. The Chapter I of the thesis focuses on the interplay between cohesin loss and mechanisms protecting mitotic fidelity. It has previously been demonstrated that premature cohesion loss triggers the activation of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC), a system for mitotic delay generated by unattached chromosomes, whose main role is to provide more time for Aurora B, the main error correction protagonist, do destabilize erroneously attached chromosomes and allow for biorientation. However, cells escape 7 SAC surveillance upon cohesion loss relatively fast, resulting in aneuploidy. Our work provided additional insight on why cohesin loss is not robustly detected by the SAC. We have demonstrated that upon premature cohesion loss, chromosomes undergo cycles of attachment and detachment to the mitotic spindle, which are Aurora B dependent. However these cycles of detachment and consecutive SAC generation decline during the arrest and result in aberrant mitotic exit. The likely reason behind this is the fact that Aurora B, as well as SAC are dependent on the activity of Cdk1- Cyclin B complex. On the other hand, the stability of Cyclin B is SAC dependent, as SAC abolishment leads to Cyclin B degradation. To add an additional layer of complexity, Aurora B activity, which leads to SAC generation, is also Cyclin B dependent. This places the entire system in a positive feedback state, where the activity decline in any of the three main modules (SAC, Aurora B and Cyclin B) results in a mitotic exit, despite the dire consequences for the cell. In the Chapter II of the thesis, we examined situations that alleviate mitotic defects caused by premature loss of cohesin. An interesting modulator screen of our collaborators, in the Drosophila wing disc, revealed that cohesion defects can be suppressed if the SAC is downregulated. This is a very counterintuitive result, as the SAC is one of the main guardians of mitotic fidelity. However, we demonstrate that the prolonged mitosis due to SAC activation in the absence of cohesin is actually detrimental to the symmetry of genome segregation, when compared to mitosis without cohesion where SAC is not active. The culprit behind this aggravated 8 asymmetry when mitosis is prolonged is the error correction and Aurora B activation, which results in continuous cycles of chromosome shuffling, attachment and detachment. Live imaging and the quantification of centromere segregation at the anaphase in the embryo, as well as the wing disc, demonstrated that mitotic fidelity can be enhanced in the absence of cohesin in two major ways. The first is the SAC inhibition, which shortens mitosis and allows for mitotic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Looking at Earth: an Astronaut's Journey Induction Ceremony 2017
    american academy of arts & sciences winter 2018 www.amacad.org Bulletin vol. lxxi, no. 2 Induction Ceremony 2017 Class Speakers: Jane Mayer, Ursula Burns, James P. Allison, Heather K. Gerken, and Gerald Chan Annual David M. Rubenstein Lecture Looking at Earth: An Astronaut’s Journey David M. Rubenstein and Kathryn D. Sullivan ALSO: How Are Humans Different from Other Great Apes?–Ajit Varki, Pascal Gagneux, and Fred H. Gage Advancing Higher Education in America–Monica Lozano, Robert J. Birgeneau, Bob Jacobsen, and Michael S. McPherson Redistricting and Representation–Patti B. Saris, Gary King, Jamal Greene, and Moon Duchin noteworthy Select Prizes and Andrea Bertozzi (University of James R. Downing (St. Jude Chil- Barbara Grosz (Harvard Univer- California, Los Angeles) was se- dren’s Research Hospital) was sity) is the recipient of the Life- Awards to Members lected as a 2017 Simons Investi- awarded the 2017 E. Donnall time Achievement Award of the gator by the Simons Foundation. Thomas Lecture and Prize by the Association for Computational American Society of Hematology. Linguistics. Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Clara D. Bloomfield (Ohio State 2017 University) is the recipient of the Carol Dweck (Stanford Univer- Christopher Hacon (University 2017 Robert A. Kyle Award for sity) was awarded the inaugural of Utah) was awarded the Break- Joachim Frank (Columbia Univer- Outstanding Clinician-Scientist, Yidan Prize. through Prize in Mathematics. sity) presented by the Mayo Clinic Di- vision of Hematology. Felton Earls (Harvard Univer- Naomi Halas (Rice University) sity) is the recipient of the 2018 was awarded the 2018 Julius Ed- Nobel Prize in Economic Emmanuel J.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Annual Review PDF 2016-17
    Annual Review 2016/17 Pushing at the frontiers of Knowledge Portrait of Dr Henry Odili Nwume (Brasenose) by Sarah Jane Moon – see The Full Picture, page 17. FOREWORD 2016/17 has been a memorable year for the country and for our University. In the ever-changing and deeply uncertain world around us, the University of Oxford continues to attract the most talented students and the most talented academics from across the globe. They convene here, as they have always done, to learn, to push at the frontiers of knowledge and to improve the world in which we find ourselves. One of the highlights of the past twelve months was that for the second consecutive year we were named the top university in the world by the Times Higher Education Global Rankings. While it is reasonable to be sceptical of the precise placements in these rankings, it is incontrovertible that we are universally acknowledged to be one of the greatest universities in the world. This is a privilege, a responsibility and a challenge. Other highlights include the opening of the world’s largest health big data institute, the Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, and the launch of OSCAR – the Oxford Suzhou Centre for Advanced Research – a major new research centre in Suzhou near Shanghai. In addition, the Ashmolean’s success in raising £1.35 million to purchase King Alfred’s coins, which included support from over 800 members of the public, was a cause for celebration. The pages that follow detail just some of the extraordinary research being conducted here on perovskite solar cells, indestructible tardigrades and driverless cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Ingredients for Success 18Th HFSP Awardees Meeting
    Ingredients for success In 2018, we yet again embarked on a new era in the HFSP by Guntram Bauer Fellowship program. After careful internal discussion and HFSPO Director of Scientific Affairs and Communications preparations, the review committee was presided over by a non- reviewing chair. Peter Koopman from the Institute of Molecular Bioscience of the University of Queensland took center stage as chair of this committee. Peter finished a four year tenure as a member of the fellowship review committee in 2016 and arrived back in Strasbourg after a three month sailing trip in the southern Pacific. Peer review at HFSP is not reading tea leaves but serious and demanding work for all involved. Thanks to Peter Koopman we successfully completed the first fellowship review committee run by a non-reviewing chair. We are still not sure what the magic ingredient was that made this fellowship committee stand out. Whether it was a truly committed international review panel, or the drive and oversight of its non-reviewing chair, or simply because of the HFSP Sauce which arrived in the chair's suitcase in Strasbourg. Probably all three, though be assured that we will get to the bottom of the HFSP Sauce! I don’t think we are boasting about HFSP when we say that our Program always tries to synchronize its procedures with the dynamics at the frontiers of science. This is particularly true for our peer review process. Over many years we have made more than just subtle changes to our procedures in response to feedback from the scientific community.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Fy 2018 Human Frontier Science Program Organization
    APRIL 2017 APRIL 2018 — MARCH 2019 ANNUAL REPORT FY 2018 HUMAN FRONTIER SCIENCE PROGRAM ORGANIZATION The Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO) is unique, supporting international collaboration to undertake innovative, risky, basic research at the frontier of the life sciences. Special emphasis is given to the support and training of independent young investigators, beginning at the postdoctoral level. The Program is implemented by an international organisation, supported financially by Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland, the United States of America, and the European Commission. Since 1990, over 7000 researchers from more than 70 countries have been supported. Of these, 28 HFSP awardees have gone on to receive the Nobel Prize. 2 The following documents are available on the HFSP website www.hfsp.org: Joint Communiqués (Tokyo 1992, Washington 1997, Berlin 2002, Bern 2004, Ottawa 2007, Canberra 2010, Brussels 2013, London 2016): https://www.hfsp.org/about/governance/membership Statutes of the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization: https://www.hfsp.org/about/governance/hfspo-statutes Guidelines for the participation of new members in HFSPO: https://www.hfsp.org/about/governance/membership General reviews of the HFSP (1996, 2001, 2006-2007, 2010, 2018): https://www.hfsp.org/about/strategy/reviews Updated and previous lists of awards, including titles and abstracts:
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive, Mechanistically Detailed, and Executable Model of the Cell Division Cycle in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/298745; this version posted April 10, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. A comprehensive, mechanistically detailed, and executable model of the Cell Division Cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ulrike Münzner1, 2, Edda Klipp1 and Marcus Krantz1 1. Institute of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany 2. Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Japan [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/298745; this version posted April 10, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT Understanding how cellular functions emerge from the underlying molecular mechanisms is one of the principal challenges in biology. It is widely recognised that this will require computational methods, and we expect the predictive power of these models to increase as model coverage and precision of formulation increase. The most potent examples to date are the genome-scale metabolic models that revolutionised their field and paved the way for a bacterial whole-cell model. However, to realise the potential of whole-cell models for eukaryotes, we must enable genome-scale modelling of other cellular networks. This has proven particularly challenging for the cellular regulatory networks, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Summary Corporate Plan
    The Gairdner Foundation Corporate Plan 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Section I About the Gairdner Foundation 2 Objectives and Achievements to Date 5 Benefits 7 Section II Performance Results for 2013 Activities 7-8 Detailed 2013 Evaluations 9-10 Planned Activities and Anticipated Results 2014 11 Section III Financial Summary 12 Planned Receipts and Disbursements 2014 13-15 Section IV Risk Management 16 Section V Performance Monitoring 17-19 1 THE GAIRDNER FOUNDATION CORPORATE PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HISTORY The Gairdner Foundation was created by James A. Gairdner to recognize and reward the achievements of medical researchers whose work “contributes significantly to improving the quality of human life”. The Foundation is a Canadian organization that has never lost sight of its primary mission – the recognition of scientists it deemed to have made the most important breakthrough discoveries in biomedical science. It’s recipients are responsible for the discovery of the structure of DNA, the eradication of smallpox, CT scans, MRI machines, the human genome, the cure for ulcers, and the vaccine against HPV, to name a few. Since the first awards were granted in 1959, the Canada Gairdner Awards have become Canada's foremost international award- and one of the most prestigious awards in medical science. Our track record of consistent high quality adjudication and selection by the independent adjudication committees have resulted in global recognition and esteem. The Gairdner was incorporated in December 1957 as a charitable corporation under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. Its funds originally derived from the personal gifts of the founder and members of his family.
    [Show full text]
  • (November) 2017
    ISSUE 2 (NOVEMBER) 2017 FEBS 2017 Congress FEBS Press FEBS Network 43rd FEBS Congress FEBS Advanced round-up Courses 2018 Page 3 Page 12 Page 14 Page 21 Page 24 CONTENTS Contents: The 2017 FEBS Congress Round-Up 3 Enjoy reports and photos from our big event of the year FEBS Press 12 3 Journal awards and activities at the 2017 FEBS Congress, and recent Special Issues FEBS Network 14 Wondering what it is? We introduce this exciting new initiative here 11 FEBS Education 15 A look back at key events this year aimed at 14 improving teaching in molecular life sciences ` FEBS Fellowships 17 Featuring recent distinguished Long-Term Fellows FEBS Community 18 12 Constituent Society meetings with FEBS National Lectures, and FEBS Council elections FEBS Congress 2018 21 And now to next year... Read about the plans from the Congress Chair and save the dates! 21 FEBS Advanced Courses 2018 24 Browse the list of next year’s focused-topic courses and meetings across Europe About FEBS News: This issue as well as all former issues of FEBS News are available online at www.febs.org. To receive an email when a new FEBS News issue is out, simply sign up to the e-newsletter in the News section of the FEBS website. Questions and suggestions about FEBS News should be sent to the FEBS News Editor, Carolyn Elliss ([email protected]). FEBS website postings: FEBS offers free advertising of academic positions (PhD students, postdocs, etc.) in the Career Opportunities section of the website, and scientific events can be listed in our Conference Calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorary Graduates – 1966 - 2004
    THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK HONORARY GRADUATES – 1966 - 2004 1966 MR PATRICK BLACKETT, physicist THE RT HON LORD GARDINER, Lord Chancellor SIR PETER HALL, director of plays and operas PRESIDENT KAUNDA, Head of State SIR HENRY MOORE, sculptor SIR ROBERT READ, poet and critic THE RT HON LORD ROBBINS, economist SIR MICHAEL TIPPETT, musician and composer THE RT HON BARONESS WOOTTON OF ABINGER 1967 SIR JOHN DUNNINGTON-JEFFERSON, for services to the University DR ARTHUR GLADWIN. For services to the University PROFESSOR F R LEAVIS, literary critic PROFESSOR WASSILY LEONTIEFF, economist PROFESSOR NIKLAUS PEVSNER, art & architecture critic and historian 1968 AMADEUS QUARTET NORBET BRAININ MARTIN LOVELL SIGMUND NISSELL PETER SCHIDLOF PROFESSOR F W BROOKS, historian LORD CLARK, art historian MRS B PAGE, librarian LORD SWANN, Biologist (and Director-General of the BBC) DAME EILEEN YOUNGHUSBAND, social administrator 1969 PROFESSOR L C KNIGHTS, literacy critic SIR PETER PEARS, singer SIR GEORGE PICKERING, scholar in medicine SIR GEORGE RUSSELL, industrial designer PROFESSOR FRANCIS WORMALD, historian 1969 Chancellor’s installation ceremony THE EARL OF CRAWFORD AND BALCARRES, patron of the arts MR JULIAN CAIN, scholar and librarian PROFESSOR DAVID KNOWLES, historian MR WALTER LIPPMAN, writer & journalist 1970 PROFESSOR ROGER BROWN, social psychologist THE RT HON THE VISCOUNT ESHER, PROFESSOR DOROTHY HODGKIN, chemist PROFESSOR A J P TAYLOR, historian 1971 DAME KITTY ANDERSON, headmistress DR AARON COPLAND, composer DR J FOSTER, secretary-General of the Association
    [Show full text]
  • Looking at Earth: an Astronaut's Journey Induction Ceremony 2017
    american academy of arts & sciences winter 2018 www.amacad.org Bulletin vol. lxxi, no. 2 Induction Ceremony 2017 Class Speakers: Jane Mayer, Ursula Burns, James P. Allison, Heather K. Gerken, and Gerald Chan Annual David M. Rubenstein Lecture Looking at Earth: An Astronaut’s Journey David M. Rubenstein and Kathryn D. Sullivan ALSO: How Are Humans Different from Other Great Apes?–Ajit Varki, Pascal Gagneux, and Fred H. Gage Advancing Higher Education in America–Monica Lozano, Robert J. Birgeneau, Bob Jacobsen, and Michael S. McPherson Redistricting and Representation–Patti B. Saris, Gary King, Jamal Greene, and Moon Duchin Upcoming Events MARCH APRIL 1st 12th California Institute of Technology American Academy Pasadena, CA Cambridge, MA Bryson Symposium on Climate and Annual Awards Ceremony: A Celebration of the Energy Policy Arts and Sciences Featuring: Dallas Burtraw (Resources for Featuring: Martha C. Nussbaum (Univer- the Future), Ralph Cavanagh (nrdc), sity of Chicago), recipient of the Don M. Nathan S. Lewis (California Institute of Randel Award for Humanistic Studies; and Technology), Mary Nichols (California Barbara J. Meyer (University of California, Air Resources Board), Ronald O. Nichols Berkeley), recipient of the Francis Amory (Southern California Edison), Thomas F. Prize in Medicine & Physiology Rosenbaum (California Institute of Tech- nology), and Maxine L. Savitz (Honeywell, MAY Inc., ret.; formerly, President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology) 3rd American Academy 7th Cambridge, MA American Academy Songs of Love and Death: Sonnets by Petrarch Cambridge, MA and Others Set by Cipriano de Rore in “I madri- Building, Exploring, and Using the Tree of Life gali a cinque voci” (Venice, 1542) Featuring: Douglas E.
    [Show full text]
  • Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology Annual Report
    Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology Annual Report 2009 © The University of Leeds, 2010 Front cover illustration: dyneins are microtubule motor proteins that transport a wide variety of cargo within the cell. Stan Burgess’ group used electron microscopy and image processing to locate GFP tags within engineered dyneins to define the main conformational change in the motor (Roberts et al. (2009) Cell, 136:485-495). The cover shows a lino-cut of a contoured image of dynein's motor domain tagged with GFP and BFP. Artwork by Bara Malkova. Acknowledgement The Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology thanks its many sponsors for support of the work and its members for writing these reports. The report is edited by David Brockwell. This report is also available electronically via http://www.astbury.leeds.ac.uk i Mission Statement The Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology will promote interdisciplinary research of the highest standard on the structure and function of biological molecules, biomolecular assemblies and complexes using physico-chemical, molecular biological and computational approaches. ii Introduction I am delighted to write the Introduction to the Annual Report on the activities of the Astbury Centre in for Structural Molecular Biology in 2009. The year marked the tenth anniversary of the establishment of the Astbury Centre as a formal University Centre, which was celebrated at the Astbury@10 meeting in June. In its first ten years, the Astbury Centre has thrived as an interdisciplinary research centre, bringing together scientists from diverse backgrounds from across the University of Leeds. This annual report provides a snapshot of the Astbury Centre’s research portfolio in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Report 2019
    Erwin Schrödinger International Institute 2019 for Mathematics and Physics T R L REPO A SI ANNU E 2019 ANNUAL ANNUAL REPORT REPORT 2019 Publisher: Christoph Dellago, Director, The Erwin Schrödinger International Institute for Mathematics and Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 9, 1090 Vienna / Austria. Editorial Office: Christoph Dellago, Beatrix Wolf. Cover-Design: steinkellner.com Photos: Österreichische Zentralbibliothek für Physik, Philipp Steinkellner. Printing: Berger, Horn. © 2020 Erwin Schrödinger International Institute for Mathematics and Physics. www.esi.ac.at Annual Report 2019 THE INSTITUTE PURSUES ITS MISSION FACILITIES / LOCATION THROUGH A VARIETY OF PROGRAMMES THE ERWIN SCHRÖDINGER INTERNA- THEMATIC PROGRAMMES offer the TIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS opportunity for a large number of AND PHYSICS (ESI), founded in 1993 scientists at all career stages to come and part of the University of Vienna together for discussions, brainstorming, since 2011, is dedicated to the ad- seminars and collaboration. They typi- vancement of scholarly research in all cally last between 4 and 12 weeks, and areas of mathematics and physics are structured to cover several topical and, in particular, to the promotion of focus areas connected by a main theme. exchange between these disciplines. A programme may also include shorter workshop-like periods. WORKSHOPS with a duration of up to THE SENIOR RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP two weeks focus on a specific scientific PROGRAMME aims at attracting topic in mathematics or physics with internationally
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers Worldwide Divided Over GM Crops Continued from fi Rst Page
    issue 12 spring 2009 promoting excellence in the molecular life sciences in europe Dear Reader, Farmers worldwide Many EMBO programmes foster talented scientists divided over GM crops throughout their careers. EMBO Fellowships – around “I don’t think we can possibly solve the since our beginning in the world’s food crisis without modern biotech- 1960s – support the postdoctoral research nology, including genetic engineering meth- of early career scientists. With 200 or more ods,” says Sir David King, the former UK gov- long-term fellowships granted each year, at ernment chief scientist and now Director any point in time at least 400 postdocs are of the Smith School of Enterprise and the benefi ting from the funding, support and inter- Environment. Countries like India, which national exchange offered by the programme. recorded the fastest growth in genetically But with only about one in six of the applica- modified (GM) crop adoption worldwide tions selected following rigorous evaluation, after its introduction in 2002, seem to share it’s clear that if only more funds were available, his opinion. Meanwhile, farmers in other more postdocs could benefi t. regions of Asia remain suspicious of any ini- EMBO applied last year to a new initia- tiatives coming from Europe or the US. The tive from the European Commission (EC) that issue, it seems, is as divisive as ever. offers co-funding of national and international The last issue of EMBOencounters fellowship programmes. In evaluating our Association | India of Farmer’s © Federation addressed the views of Western research- Farmers from the city of Yavatmal in the central Indian request, the EC praised the transparent evalu- ers working with genetically modifi ed crops state of Maharashtra on a fi eld planted with BT cotton ation procedures of EMBO Fellowships, the cli- and modern plant biotechnology.
    [Show full text]