Appendix I: Watersheds Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix I: Watersheds Contents APPENDIX I Watersheds APPENDIX I: WATERSHEDS CONTENTS Watersheds Index..........................................................................................233 Watersheds ....................................................................................................235 1. Clackamas River Subbasin ................................................................235 2. Lewis River Subbasin .........................................................................240 3. Lower Columbia – Clatskanie Subbasin .........................................246 3a. Cathlamet Channel - Columbia River ............................................247 3b. Kalama River - Frontal Columbia River .........................................251 4. Lower Columbia – Sandy Subbasin .................................................255 4a. Sandy River .........................................................................................255 4b. Washougal River ...............................................................................261 4c. The City of Washougal – Columbia River ....................................265 Overview of the Willamette River Watershed ...................................269 5. Johnson Creek Watershed .................................................................272 6. Salmon Creek – Frontal Columbia River .......................................276 7. Scappoose Creek – Frontal Columbia River Watershed .....................................................280 8. Willamette River – Frontal Columbia River Subbasin and Hayden Island-Columbia River Watershed .................................................................................................284 9. Abernethy Creek–Willamette River Watershed (Greater Oregon City) ............................................................................290 10. Chehalem Creek–Willamette River Watershed ..........................294 11. Molalla-Pudding Subbasin .............................................................297 12. Tualatin Subbasin .............................................................................303 233 REGIONAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY BIODIVERSITY GUIDE APPENDIX I Watersheds FIGURE I-1 Watersheds I. Watersheds H APPENDIX St. Helens LaCenter F I K Ridgefield Battle Scappoose Ground J Vancouver Banks Camas Washougal Portland D Forest L Grove Hillsboro G Cornelius M Troutdale Gresham Beaverton Happy Milwaukie Valley onservation biology is scale dependent. As Portland-Vancouver region (as defined in this Damascus Tigard Lake one zooms in from the scale of the entire Biogeography Guide and the Regional Conser- The extent of Oswego C the Intertwine E Sandy Earth down to continents, countries, and states vation Strategy) we try to distinguish between region was defined Tualatin Sherwood to encompass the Oregon and further down to neighborhoods and even issues relevant in the entire watershed and those City Portland-Vancouver backyards, the ecological role, function, and relevant to the area within the greater Portland- metropolitan area and its Newberg Wilsonville importance of the geography being viewed Vancouver region. Table I-1 lists the watersheds surrounding landscapes C Estacada and watersheds. It connects A keep changing. What is critically important at in the region. with, but largely excludes, B Canby one scale may not be at larger or smaller scales. the main Cascade and Coastal Ranges and the heart of the Providing an understanding of the importance, 1. Clackamas River Subbasin Willamette Valley; these areas are ecology, and connection to watershed and land- well represented by previous Cheryl McGinnis, Clackamas River Basin Council, scape health at multiple scales was an important prioritization efforts. This map Woodburn Molalla and Carol Murdock, Clackamas County Water depicts the watersheds reported on in I motivation in developing the Regional Conserva- the RCS report, which include HUC Environment Services tion Strategy and Biodiversity Guide. This chapter sub-basins, partial sub-basins, and watersheds. The region includes eight HUC-4 sub-basins; in the presents the view at the scale of the individual Includes these named USGS HUC watersheds: case of two—the Lower Willamette and the Middle Willamette—we watershed (USGS HUC 4 and HUC 5; see Chap- chose to report on the watershed (HUC-5) level. Eagle Creek ter 1). Some issues are common among many or Lower Clackamas River all watersheds; however, given the geographic and RCS Defined Watersheds socio-economic diversity within the region, each HUC 5 watersheds are lightly outlined * Represents a partial sub basin G - Lower Columbia-Sandy Sub Basin* (217,500ac) Lower Clackamas River watershed also has unique elements and chal- The Clackamas River subbasin is located in A - Abernethy Creek-Willamette River Watershed (87,000 ac) H - Lower Columbia-Slatskanie Sub Basin* (22,000ac) lenges. Clackamas and Marion counties, Oregon, east B - Chehalem Creek-Willamette River Watershed (78,000 ac) I - Molalla-Pudding Sub Basin* (181.000ac) The short descriptions of watersheds in this and south of the Portland metropolitan area. The C- Clackamas Sub Basin * (158,500 ac) J - Salmon Creek-Frontal Columbia River Watershed (131,500ac) chapter are introductions that lead to other Clackamas River is a tributary of the Willamette D - Hayden Island-Columbia River Watershed (18,500 ac) K - Scappoose Creek-Frontal Columbia River Watershed (181,000ac) resources that have been developed by local, state, River that enters the Willamette at approximately E - Johnson Creek Watershed (60,000 ac) L - Tualatin Sub Basin (453,500ac) and federal organizations and agencies (espe- River Mile (RM) 25, the last major tributary cially watershed councils in Oregon). Where a F - Lewis Sub Basin* (221,000ac) M - Willamette River-Frontal Columbia River Watershed (78,000ac) stream downstream of Willamette Falls. Eleva- watershed crosses the boundary of the greater tions in the watershed range from approximately 234 235 REGIONAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY BIODIVERSITY GUIDE APPENDIX I Watersheds TABLE 9-1 Watersheds in the Greater Portland-Vancouver Region, Organized by U.S. Geological Survey Subbasin n Has 4,228 acres within Federal Emergency having relatively flat or rolling topography. A few Subbasin Watersheds Included in the Watershed Acres Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year flood- buttes (such as the Boring lava domes) occur in Greater Portland-Vancouver Region within the Region plains. this area. Clackamas 1. Clackamas Subbasin (partial) 158,300 n Includes about 1,500 acres of mapped Western Cascades Lowlands and Valleys. This area Lewis 2. Lewis Subbasin (partial) 220,800 wetlands. includes most of the mainstem Clackamas River Lower Columbia – Clatskanie 3. Lower Columbia-Clatskanie Subbasin (partial) 22,000 and floodplain upstream of River Mill Dam; the The majority is privately owned, although agen- upper extent of the Deep, Clear, and Eagle creeks; Lower Columbia – Sandy 4. Lower Columbia-Sandy Subbasin (partial) 217,200 cies including the U.S. Bureau of Land Manage- North Fork Eagle Creek; and the lower elevation Lower Willamette 5. Johnson Creek 60,100 ment, U.S. Forest Service, Oregon Parks and portions of the middle and upper Clackamas Recreation Department, and Metro own some 6. Salmon Creek-Frontal Columbia R 131,400 tributaries, i.e., Fish Creek, Roaring River, Oak significant natural areas in the region. Portions of Grove Fork, Collawash River, and Hot Springs 7. Scappoose Creek-Frontal Columbia R 123,100 the cities of Sandy, Gladstone, Oregon City, Es- Fork. The area is characterized by low mountain 8. Willamette R-Frontal Columbia R 78,700 tacada, Happy Valley, and Damascus are located ridges, buttes, valleys, and medium-gradient riv- (includes Hayden Island – Columbia River) (Willamette R-Frontal Columbia) within the Clackamas subbasin. ers and streams. 18,600 A variety of habitat types can be found in the Humans have occupied the Clackamas sub- (Hayden Island – Columbia River) Clackamas subbasin. The U.S. Environmental basin for thousands of years. The original Native Middle Willamette 9. Abernethy Cr-Willamette R 87,100 Protection Agency (EPA) has developed the con- American inhabitants were bands from two major cept of ecoregions. Three Level IV ecoregions are 10. Chehalem Creek-Willamette R 78,200 tribal groups, the Clackamas Chinook and the represented within the portion of the Clackamas Molalla-Pudding 11. Molalla-Pudding Subbasin (partial) 181,000 Northern Molalla. Populations of both tribal subbasin that falls within the greater Portland- groups were decimated in the early 1800s by a Tualatin 12. Tualatin Subbasin 453,200 Vancouver region: prairie terraces, valley foot- series of epidemics thought to have been brought Total 1,829,600 hills, and Western Cascades lowlands and valleys. to the area by fur trappers. The Clackamas Prairie Terraces. This area, which is located along Chinook primarily occupied the lower lying and the Clackamas River downstream of River Mill northern parts of the subbasin, while the North- Dam, consists primarily of the lower Clackamas ern Molalla occupied the higher elevation and 10 feet, at the confluence with the Willamette Clackamas Subbasin (partial) mainstem and lower tributary areas. This area southern parts. 158,279 acres River, to more than 7,200 feet, at Olallie Butte is nearly level, slightly depressional, or includes Historically, the Clackamas Basin was about located along the southeast boundary of the sub- Land cover % of Watershed undulating fluvial terraces with sluggish,
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation
    2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of HUBER HEIGHTS STATE of OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M
    Agenda Page 1 of 1 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – Council Chambers 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: 2. Approval of Minutes: A. March 22, 2018 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion 4. Adjournment: https://destinyhosted.com/print_all.cfm?seq=3604&reloaded=true&id=48237 3/29/2018 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – City Council Chambers Meeting Started at 6:00pm 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: Members present: Bryan Detty, Keith Hensley, Vicki Dix, Nancy Byrge, Vincent King & Richard Shaw Members NOT present: Toni Webb • Nina Deam was resigned from the Committee 2. Approval of Minutes: No Minutes to Approval 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion • Mr. King mentioned the “Meet Me at the Park” $20,000 Grant campaign. • Mr. Detty mentioned the Lowe’s communication. • Ms. Byrge discussed the March 29, 2018 email (Copy Enclosed) • Mr. Shaw discussed access to a Shared Drive for additional information. • Mr. King shared concerns regarding “Banning” smoking at the park as no park in Huber is currently banned. • Ms. Byrge suggested Benches inside and out of the park area. • Mr. Hensley and the committee discussed in length the optional sizes for the park. • Mr. Detty expressed interest in a limestone entrance area. • Mr. Hensley suggested the 100ft distance from the North line of the Neighbors and the School property line to the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Bıoenu V( Land Management in U›E5v›I
    'Me Wíldemefif Eevíew P›v5›Aın v( tfie Bıoenu v( Land Management in U›e5v›ı _ " ;.` › › __. V L i_ „_ 4 ;' ~ gp ""! ¬~ «nvıvq f 1 -4-" _ ._ , 4_&,;¬__§?~~..„ V ıdı; "^. \-*_ ~¬¬ Q 1.z,“-_ ,._§,.';;.è,;;¶±„»_§ ' 1 4. _ _ı-?L_V wı -_ _` ' “T `;",~=:.f~ "_ ';1f“-=".f=«'í~.'›._ 2* T e \ ' "§11 ` `~. xx« (Part Une) Array Kerr ~OSPlR(5 lrwfr March 19/8 THE WILDERNESS REVIEW PROGRAM OF THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT IN OREGON PART I Andy Kerr OSPIRG Intern March, 1978 This study is dedicated to those Bureau of Land Management personnel who know what is right for the land and are doing their best to see that it is done by the Bureau. They work under difficult circurs'ances. But with them on the inside and us on the outside, changes are being made, Someday they may all come out of the rloset victorious. Copyright l978 by Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group. Individuals may reproduce or quote portions of this handbook For academic or cítizen action uses, but reproduction for commercial purposes is stríctly prohihíted. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must thank several persons who knowingly, and unknowingly, aided in this study. l'm sure that l'm forgetting some. First the BLM agency people: Ken white and Don Geary (Oregon State Office); Warren Edinger, Ron Rothschadl, and Bob Carothers (Medford District); and Dale Skeesick, Bill Power, Larry Scofield, Jerry Mclntire, Warren Tausch, John Rodosta, Scott Abdon. Jenna Gaston, Karl Bambe, and Paul Kuhns (Salem District). Bob Burkholder (U_S, Fish and Wildlife Service) was most helpful with the Oregon Islands Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Clackamas County
    EXHIBIT A - Invisible Walls: Housing Discrimination in Clackamas County 94 Table of Contents A Note About This Project ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Class Bios ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Project Introduction and Methods Statement …………………………………………………………………………. 3 Timeline ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Historic Property Deed Research …………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Metropolitan Setting of the Suburban Zone ………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Community Highlights: - Lake Oswego ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24 - Milwaukie ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 - Oregon City ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 34 Land and Conflict: The Genesis of Housing Discrimination in Clackamas County ……………………. 38 Migrant Labor in Oregon: 1958 Snapshot ………………………………………………………………………………. 41 Migrant Labor in Oregon: Valley Migrant League …………………………………………………………………… 43 Chinese in Clackamas County ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 48 Japanese in Clackamas County ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 51 Direct Violence: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 54 - Richardson Family ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 55 - Perry Ellis …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 56 Resistance in Lane County …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 57 John Livingston ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 58 Political Structure: - Zoning in Clackamas County ………………………………………………………………………………………. 59 - Urban Growth Boundary …………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Oregon Association of School Libraries Fall Conference 2018
    Journal of the Oregon Association of School Libraries Fall Conference 2018 Volume 47 Issue No. 1 Fall Conference 2018 – In this Issue – 3 Welcome from the Conference Chair by Holly Chidsey-Gardner 4 From the President’s Google Drive by Stuart Levy 5–6 Saturday Sessions at OASL Wilsonville by Stuart Levy and Holly Chidsey-Gardner 6 Conference Committee 7 Shannon McClintock Miller, OASL Preconference and Keynote Speaker by Holly Chidsey-Gardner 7–8 An Evening with Mitali Perkins by Paige Battle 9–10 Friday Dessert with R. Gregory Christie by Paige Battle 10–11 Mike Lawrence: Star Author by Paige Battle 11–12 Author Kathleen Lane by Paige Battle 12 2018 OASL Silent Auction by Jane Morgan 13 OASL Cares 13 Call for 2018 Posters 14–15 What to Do in Wilsonville by Holly Chapman 16 First Timer Scholarship by Lori Lieberman 16 Saturday Evening Awards Dinner 16 Conference Schedule Overview 17 From the ParaPro by Laura Stewart 18 ORCA Nominees 18 BCCCA Nominees 19 OBOB Titles 21–22 Intellectual Freedom by Miranda Doyle 21–25 Resource Roundup by Jen Maurer Journal of the Oregon Association of School Libraries Fall Conference 2018 Issue Editor ....... Holly Chidsey-Gardner Coordinating Editor ....... Dana Berglund Assistant Coordinating Editor ....... Erin Fitzpatrick-Bjorn Layout/Printing ....... Paula Lewis/Clackamas ESD Printing OREGON ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL LIBRARIES dba Oregon Educational Media Association MISSION STATEMENT OASL provides progressive leadership to pursue excellence in school library media programs by: • advocating information literacy
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Report
    2019 Impact Report Natural springs, meadows and forested wetlands produce, filter, and store water for approximately 50% of communities in the western US that are dependent upon forested watersheds for water provision. Front Cover: The Scott River Headwaters property contains 40,000 acres of forests with the highest conifer diversity in the world, is a source of cold, clean water, and connects three wilderness areas to a rich agricultural valley below. EFM develops natural climate solutions that aim to generate positive environmental A Leading and social impacts, including carbon sequestration, habitat enhancement, and water quality protection while creating Impact investor value. EFM stewards over $200M of capital under management and advisement via commingled private funds and consulting Investment services. Investments are made through long-term fund vehicles that serve a diverse array of investors, including individuals, Manager family offices, foundations, and institutions. We specialize in blending public, private, and philanthropic capital in investment strategies that address multiple-stakeholder objectives and in managing investments for their full range of financial, ecological and social values. The Garibaldi forest is home to the first verified carbon project on private forestland in Oregon and Washington, which was developed by EFM in 2013 and expanded in 2019. These offsets are made possible by EFM’s management actions that extend rotations, expand reserves, retain trees in harvest units and protect important habitat. 1 Real
    [Show full text]
  • OR Wild -Backmatter V2
    208 OREGON WILD Afterword JIM CALLAHAN One final paragraph of advice: do not burn yourselves out. Be as I am — a reluctant enthusiast.... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted fanatic. Save the other half of your- selves and your lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough to fight for the land; it is even more important to enjoy it. While you can. While it is still here. So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests, climb the mountains, bag the peaks, run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and lucid air, sit quietly for awhile and contemplate the precious still- ness, the lovely mysterious and awesome space. Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and your head firmly attached to the body, the body active and alive and I promise you this much: I promise you this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those desk-bound men with their hearts in a safe-deposit box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators. I promise you this: you will outlive the bastards. —Edward Abbey1 Edward Abbey. Ed, take it from another Ed, not only can wilderness lovers outlive wilderness opponents, we can also defeat them. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (sic) UNIVERSITY, SHREVEPORT UNIVERSITY, to do nothing. MES SMITH NOEL COLLECTION, NOEL SMITH MES NOEL COLLECTION, MEMORIAL LIBRARY, LOUISIANA STATE LOUISIANA LIBRARY, MEMORIAL —Edmund Burke2 JA Edmund Burke. 1 Van matre, Steve and Bill Weiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Wilderness-Like Areas, but Instead Declassified Previously Protected Wildlands with High Timber Value
    48 OREGON WILD A Brief Political History of Oregon’s Wilderness Protections Government protection should be thrown around every wild grove and forest on the Although the Forest Service pioneered the concept of wilderness protection in the mountains, as it is around every private orchard, and trees in public parks. To say 1920s and 1930s, by the late 1940s and 1950s, it was methodically undoing whatever nothing of their values as fountains of timber, they are worth infinitely more than all good it had done earlier by declassifying administrative wilderness areas that contained the gardens and parks of town. any commercial timber. —John Muir1 Just prior to the end of its second term, and after receiving over a million public comments in support of protecting national forest roadless areas, the Clinton Administration promulgated a regulation (a.k.a. “the Roadless Rule”) to protect the Inadequacies of Administrative remaining unprotected wildlands (greater than 5,000 acres in size) in the National Forest System from road building and logging. At the time, Clinton’s Forest Service Protections chief Mike Dombeck asked rhetorically: here is “government protection,” and then there is government protection. Mere public ownership — especially if managed by the Bureau of Is it worth one-quarter of 1 percent of our nation’s timber supply or a fraction of a Land Management — affords land little real or permanent protection. fraction of our oil and gas to protect 58.5 million acres of wild and unfragmented land T National forests enjoy somewhat more protection than BLM lands, but in perpetuity?2 to fully protect, conserve and restore federal forests often requires a combination of Wilderness designation and additional appropriate congressional Dombeck’s remarks echoed those of a Forest Service scientist from an earlier era.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-328-June 26, 1984
    98 STAT. 272 PUBLIC LAW 98-328-JUNE 26, 1984 Public Law 98-328 98th Congress An Act June 26, 1984 To designate certain national forest system and other lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1149] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, That this Act may Wilderness Act be referred to as the "Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National SEc. 2. (a) The Congress finds that- Wilderness (1) many areas of undeveloped National Forest System land in Preservation the State of Oregon possess outstanding natural characteristics System. which give them high value as wilderness and will, if properly National Forest preserved, contribute as an enduring resource of wilderness for System. the ben~fit of the American people; (2) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have identified areas which, on the basis of their landform, ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location, will help to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a quality National Wilderness Preservation System; and (3) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have also identified areas which do not possess outstand­ ing wilderness attributes or which possess outstanding energy, mineral, timber, grazing, dispersed recreation and other values and which should not now be designated as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System but should be avail­ able for nonwilderness multiple uses under the land manage­ ment planning process and other applicable laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issue
    PRESORTED STANDARD MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID PORTLAND, OR PERMIT NO. 700 College naming Welcome Center after Grand Ronde Chief Wacheno — pg. 6 february 1, 2021 Tribes receive good COVID-19 funding news Deadline to spend monies extended until end of 2021 By Dean Rhodes Smoke Signals editor ative American Tribes na- tionwide received two good Npieces of news in December and January regarding COVID-19 relief funding as the federal govern- ment transitioned to the new Biden administration. Tribes received news on Dec. 12 that their deadline for spend- ing Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act funding approved in March 2020 has been extended by a year to Dec. 31, 2021, as part of the Consolidated Appro- priations 2021 Act that was signed into law. The Grand Ronde Tribe received a combined $44 million from the Photo by Timothy J. Gonzalez Treasury Department in three LightWerks Communication Systems Inc. Lead AV installer Beau Krebsbach left and AV Installer Corey Nelson payments and $1.56 million from , , the Department of the Interior in work on installing the second of two 85-inch televisions in the Tribal Council Chambers on Tuesday, Jan. 12. The CARES Act funding. new TVs are part of a major technological upgrade within the Governance Center. The Tribe used approximately 42 percent of that emergency funding – $19.3 million – to fund a COVID-19 Relief Payment program that sent a Council Chambers 2.0 total of $4,400 to each adult Tribal member in eight monthly payments from April through November. Technology upgrades allow full remote participation The relief payments approved in March were designed to help Tribal By Danielle Harrison in meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Nificant Natural Area Sites and Interconnections
    .~­ ". \ i' .- / ,.• --- ./ \. \ ~ • I. • h j . .LC .' \. \ \ '.', ."'- /_ ,I • ~, I • ,{ \ I j .' ,,'" "..', r -, " (. ) ./ ..~, / / --)" ( , / '- L • r-( ."• \ " • ." L •~ rr ('., r I" ~••. / r ~ ). ," , \ . ) / ) •. ~ \ '-: '.' / -' ", ,'; ---' -, ", - ( '..\~ , " ' '. ,J \. ) .~ .\ / -" ,e.' ·r ","." ~ METROPOLITAN - e> )~ .' \ I" e :\(?-reel1space~, :- J • 'f /' r: /. ..../ .J \ • ~.' / l .. 'v' /". • '> I / I e-, ~ ./ ,I \ • .>" ) Master-Piait ) e• .,/ r ", / Ij .'-..... L e "'" '. \ e ( r e /. e e, , --- '~. e j -.', ,.­ ;' r .. •er, ) r / -'. ~ \' - ( . ~ . ., ~ ~' -\ A Cooperative Regio!lal$ystem ofNa.tural Areas, "Open Space, T~f!:..ils a~¢ Gree.nways / /', ' '.)' " forWilcJlife and p,!ople . ./( . ./ ,... ' .... / r • '. X- •.\ / e ! -, "e- ( \ - '- '\ .J • r~gional go~ernmeht (As' ofJuly 1992) "- (. • Metro is the 'directly elected thatserves , .. ,/ Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington cOUlities andilie 24 Policy Advisory COn:'!m,ittee M,ember;s: • \'citiesThat make up the P~rtlana metropolita~;rea. " "'- Ri~hard Devlin, Metro councilor and chair •e- Metr~is ;~spon~ible f~r soli~:~aste management, op~ration/of Ruth~cFariana, Metro,co~n;ilor rmd vice-chair ,_ .i ,'-- M~tro us~ \, the Washington Park Zoo, transportation-and land Sandi Hansen/Metro councilor " "- ~" ' pl~nping, 1da~inerstad, commissi~ne~ urban growth boundary management, technical ." J Judie Clackamas County . ,. services to local go\\ernments and, 'through the Metropolitan Pauline Anderson, Multnomah County commissioner ) r·, ) : fxposition)Recre,ation Gommission,man~gementofthe
    [Show full text]