Meeting Agenda, Jan. 8, 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ATTORNEY FIRST AID KIT PROGRAM MATERIALS | February 15, 2019 Friday, February 15, 2019 ICLE: State Bar Series
ICLE ATTORNEY FIRST AID KIT PROGRAM MATERIALS | February 15, 2019 Friday, February 15, 2019 ICLE: State Bar Series ATTORNEY FIRST AID KIT 5.5 CLE Hours including 1 Ethics Hour Sponsored By: Institute of Continuing Legal Education Copyright © 2019 by the Institute of Continuing Legal Education of the State Bar of Georgia. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of ICLE. The Institute of Continuing Legal Education’s publications are intended to provide current and accurate information on designated subject matter. They are off ered as an aid to practicing attorneys to help them maintain professional competence with the understanding that the publisher is not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice. Attorneys should not rely solely on ICLE publications. Attorneys should research original and current sources of authority and take any other measures that are necessary and appropriate to ensure that they are in compliance with the pertinent rules of professional conduct for their jurisdiction. ICLE gratefully acknowledges the eff orts of the faculty in the preparation of this publication and the presentation of information on their designated subjects at the seminar. The opinions expressed by the faculty in their papers and presentations are their own and do not necessarily refl ect the opinions of the Institute of Continuing Legal Education, its offi cers, or employees. The faculty is not engaged in rendering legal or other professional advice and this publication is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. -
2001-2002 Annual Report Georgia State University College of Law
Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Annual Reports Historical Materials October 2002 2001-2002 Annual Report Georgia State University College of Law Janice C. Griffith Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/annual Institutional Repository Citation Georgia State University College of Law and Griffith,a J nice C., "2001-2002 Annual Report" (2002). Annual Reports. 24. https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/annual/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Historical Materials at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Annual Reports by an authorized administrator of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANNUAL REPORT 2001 - 2002 GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY ANNUAL REPORT FY02 COLLEGE OF LAW w September, 2002 College of Law 2001-2002 Annual Report Section A. Summary of Major Accomplishments Planning for the Future The most important accomplishment among the many notable achievements this past year was the adoption by the faculty of a new strategic plan to guide the College of Law in the years ahead. The new plan was the result of several years of diligent effort on the part of many among the faculty and administration. The new plan integrates the college's future goals with the university's strategic plan and goals. Coupled with strategic planning was the development of a more specific plan of improvement arising out of the university's academic program review. Together these documents gives clear direction and specific goals for the college to achieve in the years ahead. Interdisciplinary Programs More interdisciplinary activities are an important goal in the new strategic plan. -
Georgia Lawyer Legacies
GBJ Feature GeorgiaGeorgia LawyerLawyer LegaciesLegacies by Sarah I. Coole, Jennifer R. Mason and Johanna B. Merrill Illustration by Marc Cardwell ith a Bar membership as diverse as (admitted to the Bar in 1982) knows what it means to honor the profession. She follows in the footsteps of Georgia’s—where people relocate to members of the Abbot-Hardeman family, dating back to the 1800s. On the Hardeman side, her mater- our cities from the other 49 states and nal great-great-great-grandfather Robert Vines W Hardeman served as lawyer, state representative countries as far away as China—it may be easy to for- and Superior Court judge in the Ocmulgee Circuit. Other Hardeman family lawyers include Abbot’s get that for a number of Georgia lawyers, the roots of great-grandfather, Robert Northington “R.N.” Hardeman (1894) and her grandfather, Robert their legal careers run deep. For some, they are but the Northington Hardeman Jr. (1915). Two paternal great-great uncles, Judge William Little Phillips and second generation: the beginning of a legal legacy that John Robert Phillips both practiced in Jefferson County. According to Judge Abbot, “If you were to may stretch for generations to come. Others, however, take a look at the cases on appeal out of the courts in Jefferson County, you would see that many are con- can find their last names in Georgia Bar Association nected with an Abbot, Phillips or Hardeman.” Judge Abbot’s view of lawyers and the legal profes- rosters from before the Civil War. sion was integrally shaped by how her father, James Carswell “Jim” Abbot (1951), and grandfather, William We asked the Bar’s membership to let us know if they Wright Abbot Jr. -
Planning Ahead: a Guide to Protecting Your Clients' Interests in the Event Of
PLANNING AHEAD: A GUIDE TO PROTECTING YOUR CLIENTS’ INTERESTS IN THE EVENT OF YOUR DISABILITY OR DEATH A Handbook and Forms 2016 Idaho State Bar PO Box 895 Boise, ID 83701 www.isb.idaho.gov (208) 334-4500 Board of Commissioners Trudy Hanson Fouser President Tim Gresback Past President Michelle R. Points Commissioner Dennis S. Voorhees Commissioner Kent A. Higgins Commissioner Executive Director Diane K. Minnich Bar Counsel Bradley G. Andrews DISCLAIMER This handbook is designed to minimize the likelihood of you or your estate being sued for legal malpractice in the event of your death, disability, impairment, or incapacity. The material presented does not establish, report, or create the standard of care for attorneys. The material is not a complete analysis of the topic, and readers should conduct their own appropriate legal research. May 2016 Dear Idaho Lawyer: This handbook was created to help you fulfill your ethical obligations to protect your clients' interests in the event of your death, disability, impairment, or incapacity. Although it is hard to think about events that could render you unable to continue practicing law, freak accidents, unexpected illness, and untimely death do occur. Following the suggestions in this handbook will help to protect your clients' interests and will help to make your practice a valuable asset to your estate. In addition, it will simplify the closure of your office - a step your family and colleagues will very much appreciate. We hope this handbook will be of assistance to you. Sincerely, Senior Lawyers Transition Task Force William F. (Bud) Yost III, Chair Hon. -
To View Our Firm Resume
SPEED & SETA, LLC was formed in 2001 by Wallace Speed and Lesli Seta. The firm has expanded to become SPEED, SETA, MARTIN, TRIVETT & STUBLEY, LLC , a regional firm serving all of the Southeast, with offices in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, M ississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The attorneys practicing at the firm dedicate their practice to the defense of businesses in civil litigation, including workers’ compensation, subrogation, general liability, and federal Longsho r e & Harbor Workers' Compensation. The firm proudly represents some of the largest insurance companies, employers, and third - party administrators in the country, in addition to local boards of education, local governments, and self - insured employers in our c ommunities. Martindale - Hubble rates the firm as an AV firm, the highest possible rating under the Martindale - Hubbell law firm rating system, and the firm's attorneys have been named to Super Lawyers and Best Lawyers in America. B IOGRAPHICAL S KETCHES P ARTNERS W ALLACE S PEED (1941 - 202 0 ) graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree, and he subsequently served seven years on active duty in the Army (Infantry) prior to entering law school. He graduated f ro m the Emory University School of Law and then spent several years as a Senior Assistant District Attorney in Atlanta. There he prosecuted numerous major felony cases, including the “ Atlanta Missing and Murdered Children ” case which attracted i nternationa l attention. While at the DA's office he attended Georgia State University at night and obtained a Master’s degree in Public Administration. -
What Duty of Care Does a Homeowners Association Owe Its
December 2016 Volume 22, Number 4 ’Tis the Season: GEORGIA BAR Recognizing the Value of Mentoring No Vacation: Top Georgia Criminal Defense Attorneys JOURNAL Travel to Tbilisi A Conversation with Gov. Nathan Deal The Convocation on Professionalism: The New Normal for Delivery of Legal Services THE LEGAL What Duty of Care Does a Homeowner Association Owe Its Members? GEORGIA BAR JOURNAL Get Published Earn CLE Credit The Editorial Board of the Georgia Bar Journal is in regular need of scholarly legal articles to print in the Journal. Earn CLE credit, see your name in print and help the legal community by submitting an article today! Submit articles to Sarah I. Coole Director of Communications [email protected] | 404-527-8791 104 Marietta St. NW, Suite 100, Atlanta 30303 THE VIRTUAL MUSEUM OF LAW MEET PROFESSOR MCGEE AND STRIKER, the newest members of the Law-Related Education Program of the State Bar of Georgia. They are part of the Virtual Museum of Law, a new online educational resource. The site is complete with animated videos of famous cases, quizzes for students and lesson plans for teachers. For more information, email [email protected] or call Director of LRE Deborah Craytor at 404-527-8785. www.thelawmuseum.org Law-related Educa ion Program DECEMBER 2016 HEADQUARTERS COASTAL GEORGIA OFFICE SOUTH GEORGIA OFFICE 104 Marietta St. NW, Suite 100 18 E. Bay St. 244 E. Second St. (31794) Atlanta, GA 30303 Savannah, GA 31401-1225 P.O. Box 1390 800-334-6865 | 404-527-8700 877-239-9910 | 912-239-9910 Tifton, GA 31793-1390 Fax 404-527-8717 Fax 912-239-9970 800-330-0446 | 229-387-0446 www.gabar.org Fax 229-382-7435 EDITORIAL OFFICERS OF THE QUICK DIAL MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION BOARD STATE BAR OF GEORGIA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE The Georgia Bar Journal welcomes the submission of EDITOR-IN-CHIEF PRESIDENT 800-334-6865 ext. -
GB Journal Feb99
GetGet itit inin WritingWriting EXPLORING PRODUCE LAW • CHILDFEBRUARY SUPPORT 1999 CENTER • MIDYEAR MEETING1 KeyCite - pickup 12/98 inside front 2 GEORGIA BAR JOURNAL Editorial Board THEODORE H. DAVIS JR., Editor-in-Chief JENNIFER M. DAVIS, Managing Editor LYN ARMSTRONG D. SCOTT MURRAY GARY C. CHRISTY MARISA ANNE PAGNATTARO O. WAYNE ELLERBEE EARNEST REDWINE February 1999 • Vol. 4 No. 4 GEORGE W. FRYHOFER III AMELIA TOY RUDOLPH MICHAEL JABLONSKI WILLIAM W. SAPP ANNE R. JACOBS JOHN SPANGLER III MICHELLE W. JOHNSON PAMELA WHITE-COLBERT On the Cover: U.S. District Judge William T. Moore Jr. and Timothy M. O’Brien SARAJANE N. LOVE J. MICHAEL WIGGINS address the ethical issues surrounding a criminal defense attorney’s agreement with his or her client. (Photo by Richard T. Bryant) Officers of the State Bar of Georgia (ex officio members) QUICK DIAL WILLIAM E. CANNON JR., ALBANY President Attorney Discipline ............... (800) 334-6865 ext. 720 (404) 527-8720 Consumer Assistance Program ...................................... (404) 527-8759 RUDOLPH N. PATTERSON, MACON Conference Room Reservations .................................... (404) 527-8712 President-elect Fee Arbitration ............................................................... (404) 527-8750 JAMES B. FRANKLIN, STATESBORO Continuing Legal Education Transcripts ....................... (404) 527-8710 Secretary Diversity Program ......................................................... (404) 527-8754 GEORGE E. MUNDY, CEDARTOWN ETHICS Hotline .................................. (800) -
Designing a New Tier of Civil Legal Professional for Survivors of Domestic Violence
REPORT TO THE ARIZONA SUPREME COURT TASK FORCE ON DELIVERY OF LEGAL SERVICES Designing a New Tier of Civil Legal Professional for Survivors of Domestic Violence Innovation for Justice Program Innovating Legal Services Course, Spring 2019 www.law.arizona.edu/i4j This page intentionally blank. INTRODUCTION Students in the Innovating Legal Services course at the University of Arizona designed a one-year pilot program that would provide legal training to lay legal advocates at Emerge Center Against Domestic Abuse (“Emerge”). Emerge currently has seven lay legal advocates who assist domestic violence survivors (“participants”) in navigating civil legal processes. Domestic violence survivors typically navigate the civil legal system without the assistance of counsel, or with limited advice and brief service from legal aid agencies. Currently, lay legal advocates can provide legal information to survivors, but cannot offer legal advice. In this pilot program, lay legal advocates who complete a training and exam offered by the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law would be certified for a one-year period as “LLAs,” a new tier of civil legal service provider. As LLAs, they would be licensed to provide legal advice to Emerge participants in specific areas. The pilot would provide valuable information about whether a new tier of legal service can improve access to justice in the civil legal system. This report provides an overview of the pilot program, including: (1) the scope of legal services that LLAs could provide; (2) how LLAs would be trained at University of Arizona Law; (3) how the LLAs would be certified, licensed and regulated by the State Bar of Arizona; (4) how the bench, bar and public would receive education regarding the new LLA program; (5) recommendations for evaluation of the pilot; (6) expected costs of the pilot. -
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 364 487 SO 023 626 TITLE State and Local
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 364 487 SO 023 626 TITLE State and Local Bar Associations Law-Related Education Activities. INSTITUTION American Bar Association, Chicago, Ill. Special Committee on Youth Education for Citizenship. PUB DATE [93] NOTE 26p.; For related items, see SO 023 625-628. AVAILABLE FROMAmerican Bar Association, Special Committee on Youth Education for Citizenship, 541 N. Fairbanks Court, Chicago, IL 60611-3314. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Directories/Catalogs (132) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Alcohol Education; Drug Education; Elementary Secondary Education; *Law Related Education; Lawyers; *Learning Activities; Professional Associations; School Community Relationship; Social Studies; *Youth Programs IDENTIFIERS American Bar Association; Law Day ABSTRACT This document is a listing of the law-related education activities of state and local bar associations grouped by state. Under each state, the state association and often one or more local association are listed. Information on each association includes committees relating to law related education, a listing of law related education activities, funding sources, and the name, address, and phone number of the appropriate contact person. Some association listings also include volunteer recruitment strategies and resources. Listed activities include Law Day, mediation, Lawyer in the Classroom, teen court, mock trials, court docent, bicentennial, teacher education, programs f,31- at-risk youth, and drug prevention projects. The most common funding sources include general operating budgets, bar foundation grants, senior bar funding, Young Lawyers Section activity budgets, and organization dues. Volunteers are recruited by personal appeals, contacts for specific projects, publicity of projects, volunteer sign up sheets in dues packets, special invitations, and articles in organization newsletters. -
Client Trust Accounting for Arizona Attorneys
Client Trust Accounting for Arizona Attorneys Publication of the State Bar of Arizona © 2014 All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer The State Bar’s Lawyer Regulation Office and Special Services Department have prepared this Client Trust Accounting Manual for Arizona Attorneys for its members. It has not been adopted or endorsed by the State Bar’s Board of Governors, and does not constitute the official position or policy of the State Bar of Arizona. It is advisory only and is not binding on the Arizona Supreme Court. The Manual contains legal information, not legal advice. While the State Bar will make every effort to update the manual as necessary, it is the responsibility of members to make sure that they are following the most current version of the Arizona Supreme Court Rules, which contain the Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct, in conjunction with this manual. Nothing contained in this Manual is intended to address any specific legal inquiry, nor is it a substitute for independent legal research to original sources or for obtaining the advice of legal counsel with respect to legal problems. The workbook may not be reproduced or copied in any manner without the express, written permission of the State Bar of Arizona. For information or a copy of this workbook, contact the State Bar of Arizona, 4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85016-6266. Acknowledgements Selected portions of this manual were adopted, adapted, and/or reprinted from the materials originally authored by the following jurisdictions and individuals with their permission: The State Bar of California, Handbook on Client Trust Accounting for California Attorneys © 2006 (For the current online version of the California Handbook, please go to: http://www.calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/ethics/2006_CTA_Handbook.pdf) at State Bar of Arizona Trust Account Manual Section I, Pages 2-3, Section II, Pages 6-26, Section III, Pages 27-32, Section IV, Pages 33-40, Section VI, Pages 47-49, Section VII, Pages 54-56, Section VIII, Pages 59-70, and Section IX, Pages 72-83. -
Utah Ethics Opinions 1992. 114. USB EAOC Opinion No. 114 Utah State
Utah Ethics Opinions fault of the named insured or other persons entitled to PIP benefits.'"9 In the vast majority of these cases "payment is 1992. generated automatically by simply filing a standard one page claim form with the insurer."10 "Since there is 114. USB EAOC Opinion No. 114 virtually no risk and the time to be required to the lawyer is minimal, [state bar ethics committees and] courts uniformly Utah State Bar hold that contingent fees are an improper measure of Ethics Advisory Opinion Committee professional compensation in such cases."11 Opinion No. 114 State bars that have considered this matter have stated their positions clearly and concisely. According to the State Bar Approved February 20, 1992 of Georgia: Issue: Is a one-third contingency fee charged by an attorney Generally a lawyer may not charge a fee contingent on a unreasonable or excessive if the recovery includes personal client's receipt of PIP benefits (accident insurance providing injury protection ("PIP" or "no fault") payments from the compensation to injured persons without regard to fault). client's insurer? Contingent fees are generally higher because receipt of the fee is itself contingent on some possibility. Since PIP Opinion: Under the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct, benefits are virtually guaranteed to accident victims a fee which require that a lawyer's fee be reasonable,1 contingent contingent on receipt of those benefits is likely to be fees charged for the routine filing and collection of unreasonable.12 undisputed PIP or "no fault" claims from the client's insurer are unreasonable and excessive.2 State bars, courts, and The South Carolina Bar agrees: commentators facing this issue uniformly agree that A lawyer may not consider the amounts recovered from the contingent fees charged on the recovery of undisputed PIP client's personal injury protection insurance coverage in payments are unreasonable. -
Handbook ORGANIZATION of the STATE BAR & ADMISSIONS Part I – Creation & Organization
Handbook ORGANIZATION OF THE STATE BAR & ADMISSIONS Part I – Creation & Organization ...................................................................................................... H-2 Part V – Amendment & Effective Date ............................................................................................. H-7 Bylaws ............................................................................................................................................ H-7 Standing Board Policy 100 (Legislative Policy and Procedure) ...................................................... H-14 Standing Board Policy 200 (Annual Statement of Revenue and Expenditures) ............................. H-16 Standing Board Policy 300 (Board Attendance Policy) ................................................................... H-16 Standing Board Policy 400 (Retired Board Members)..................................................................... H-17 Standing Board Policy 500 (Special Masters) ................................................................................. H-17 Standing Board Policy 600 (Conflicts of Interest) ............................................................................ H-17 Standing Board Policy 700 (Document Handling and Disclosure) .................................................. H-17 Standing Board Policy 800 (Confidentiality) .................................................................................... H-17 Standing Board Policy 900 (Whistleblower Non-Retaliation) ..........................................................