Islamic Antisemitism” **** Both Christianity and Islam Were Birthed from the Womb of Judaism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Islamic Antisemitism” **** Both Christianity and Islam Were Birthed from the Womb of Judaism First Congregational United Church of Christ – Eugene, Oregon THE ORIGIN OF ANTISEMITISM V “Islamic Antisemitism” **** Both Christianity and Islam were birthed from the womb of Judaism. However, since Islam was not a break-away sect as was Christianity, its relationship to Judaism was less bitter and was originally more like a squabble among strangers than an internecine strife among siblings. Initially, Jews were treated kindly by the early Muslims of Medina where the Islamic calendar began in 622. Some historians believe that Mohammad expected the Jews to accept Islam and its teachings, and when most of them did not, the relationship soured. There was also a series of Muslim inter-tribal wars that erupted, culminating in 627 when the largest of the Jewish groups known as the Qurayza was decimated by Mohammad’s forces for having failed to come to his aid during an outside attack on Medina. Charged with having “sinned in their hearts” for having held back their support for Islam, Mohammad ordered the beheading of all adult Jewish males and the enslavement of their wives and children. Then their lands and other property were divided among Mohammad’s Muslim followers. It was the beginning of a pattern in which Jews were tolerated or rejected on condition of their loyalty and the tribute they were willing to pay. By 750, more than a century later, Muslims controlled much of the old Roman and Byzantine Empires as well as parts of the Persian Empire. With regard to people who worshipped other gods, Muslims continued to call for conversion or death, but they dealt differently with Jews and Christians with whom they shared a monotheistic faith. Members of all three religions accepted many of the same prophets, believed in life after death and judgment, and had similar ideas about the creation of the world. But Muslims did not consider Jews and Christians as equals but as dhimmi—people who belonged to a “tolerated” religion. Dhimmi were allowed certain rights and privileges, but were also given specific prohibitions that were spelled out in an agreement often referred to as the Pact of Umar. Phyllis Goldstein, in her book A Convenient Hatred: The History of Antisemitism, lists some of its conditions: (1) We shall keep our gates wide open for passersby and travelers; (2) We shall not shelter any spy in our places of worship or homes; (3) We shall provide three days food and lodging to any Muslims who pass our way; (4) We shall not build in our cities or in Muslim neighborhoods any new synagogues, churches, heritages, or monk’s cells; (5) We shall not restore, by night or day, any of them that have fallen into ruin or which are located in the Muslims’ quarters; (6) We shall not hold public religious ceremonies or read our holy books aloud in public; (7) We shall not seek to proselytize anyone nor shall we prevent any of our kind from embracing Islam if they so desire; (8) We shall show deference to the Muslims and shall rise from our seats when they wish to sit down; (9) We shall not seek to resemble the Muslims in any way with regard to their dress; (9) We shall not display our crosses or our books anywhere in the Muslim’s thoroughfares or in their marketplaces; (10) We shall not build our homes higher than theirs. First Congregational United Church of Christ – Eugene, Oregon The pact views non-Muslims as people who have ben given the opportunity to accept the truth but have willfully chosen to persist in erroneous beliefs. In accordance with this view, the authorities found ways not only to distinguish Muslims from nonbelievers but also to humiliate the dhimmi and constantly remind them of their inferiority. No matter how high they rose or how well they blended into society, they were never regarded as equals. Perhaps as a way to escape oppressive taxes and laws that labeled them as inferior, many Christians converted to Islam over the next 150 years. By the end of the eighth century, North Africa and southwest Asia, regions that had been predominantly Christian, had become Muslim. Jews were also deeply affected by these changes. Approximately 90 percent of the world’s Jews were by then living under Muslim rule. Some converted to Islam, but most did not. Many found that the laws of the dhimmi gave them some measure of protection. Yet those same laws, along with others imposed by various Muslim rulers, also reinforced their second-class status and publicly humiliated them. Like Christians, Jews were made to pay higher taxes on their land as well as a poll tax. This drove many Jewish farmers off their land and into town where they became tanners, gold- and silver-smiths, butchers, barbers, blacksmiths, dyers, and shoemakers. Some owned small shops, while others participated in the international trade. This was also the period when many Jews began moving beyond the Mediterranean Sea to places in Europe to escape discrimination and persecution, and also to take advantage of greater economic opportunities in the north. However, due to increased pressure from both medieval Christians and Muslims, Jews were gradually pushed out of most of the professions of Europe and were prohibited from engaging in the normal livelihoods open to others. This forced Jews into two of the only available fields open to them: money-lending and currency exchange, both of which were prohibited by the teachings of Jews, Christians, and Muslims, and for which they then became stereotyped as “greedy, money-grabbing Jews.” It was during this period that the phrase, “Jew down” came into use as a reference to the process of negotiating more favorable prices for something. In the beginning, Mohammad had both hoped and expected the Jews to recognize him as the final and greatest prophet of Mosaic monotheism and when they did not he felt seriously threatened. One major factor that rendered Mohammad’s claims untenable to Jews was his apparent ignorance of the Bible. In Sura 28:38 of the Koran, for instance, he had Pharaoh (from Exodus) ask Haman (from the Book of Esther) to erect the Tower of Babel (which appears in the beginning of Genesis). In addition, some of his moral teachings did not seem to equal, let alone supersede, the prophetic teachings of Judaism and Christianity. In Sura 4:34, for example, he instructs men to beat disobedient wives, which must have rendered absurd the prophet’s claim that he was superseding the ethical imperatives of the Torah or the teachings of Jesus. For these and other reasons, Jews rejected Mohammad’s prophetic claims and refused to become Muslims, resulting in Mohammad turning against the Jews for basically the same reason that Christians had turned against them earlier: their refusal to recognize either Jesus or Mohammad as the human incarnation of God’s revealed truth. Mohammad and the Koran thus laid the basis for subsequent antisemitism among Muslims for basically the same reason as the New Testament and the early Church Fathers had for Christians: the First Congregational United Church of Christ – Eugene, Oregon insistence of Jews to remain Jews and everything Jewish. Jew-hatred by both Christianity and Islam was ultimately a hatred of all things Jewish since any Jew who converted to Christianity or to Islam was immediately accepted as an equal by the aforementioned group. Those who refused, while usually tolerated, were also subjected to all manner of indignities, inequities, sufferings, and sometimes death. The two guiding principles of Islam’s treatment of Jews and Christians were that Islam dominates and is not dominated, and that Jews and Christians are to be subservient and degraded. This “relationship” continued from the time of Mohammad’s death until the modern period. By the nineteenth century, the Jew’s situation under Islam went from degradation to being recurrent victims of violence. Edward Lane, in An Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians (1833-35), the Jews “are held in the utmost contempt and abhorrence by the Muslims in general . many a Jew has been put to death upon a false and malicious accusation of uttering disrespectful words against the Koran or the Prophet.” In 1840, some French Catholics introduced the blood libel into the Arab world, with rumors of Jews torturing and murdering Arabs in ritualistic-style. These blood libels quickly became popular among Muslims who attacked Jews as drinkers of Muslim blood in Aleppo, Syria, Damascus, Cairo and Alexandria. In nineteenth century Palestine, Jews had to walk past Muslims on their left, as the left is identified with Satan, and they had to yield the right-of-way to a Muslim, by “stepping into the street and letting him pass.” Synagogues had to be located in hidden, remote areas, a host of “protection taxes” had to be paid, and unsold Arab merchandise was frequently dumped on Jewish neighbors who were then billed for them (James Finn, Stirring Times, 1:118-119). It is the Jew’s refusal to accept an unequal, inferior status that lies at the heart of the Arab- Muslim hatred for the state of Israel today. As Yehoshafat Harkabi states: “The existence of the Jews was not a provocation to Islam . as long as Jews were subordinate or degraded. But a Jewish state is incompatible with the view of Jews as humiliated or wretched” (Arab Attitudes Toward Israel, p. 221). This hatred of Jewish nationalism is so intense that during World War II, most Arab leaders were pro- Nazi. The mufti Haj Amin el-Husseini was an ardent supporter of Hitler. On November 2, 1943, at a time when the Nazis were murdering thousands of Jews daily, the Mufti was quoted as saying: “The overwhelming egoism which lies in the character of Jews, their unworthy belief that they are God’s chosen nation and their assertion that all was created for them and that other people are animals .
Recommended publications
  • Christians and Jews in the Muslim World
    Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand 30, Open Papers presented to the 30th Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand held on the Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, July 2-5, 2013. http://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/sahanz-2013/ Mohammed Gharipour and Stephen Caffey, “Christians and Jews in the Muslim World: The Dilemma of Religious Space” in Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand: 30, Open, edited by Alexandra Brown and Andrew Leach (Gold Coast, Qld: SAHANZ, 2013), vol. 1, p 315-326. ISBN-10: 0-9876055-0-X ISBN-13: 978-0-9876055-0-4 Christians and Jews in the Muslim World The Dilemma of Religious Space Mohammed Gharipour, Morgan State University Stephen Caffey, Texas A&M University The long history of relations between Muslims and non- Muslims is a history of physical, metaphorical and idealogical proximities and distances. From among the myriad expressions of Muslim and non-Muslim identities, churches and synagogues provide unique insight into the complex interactions between Islam and other religious and spiritual traditions. The design and construction processes undertaken by various inhabitants of those communities often reflect the competitive tensions and reconciliations within and between member groups. Whether constructed by non-Muslims in a predominantly Muslim society or preserved in their original froms and/or functions after the arrival of Islam, it is in such sites, structures and spaces that one may find some of the most potent applications of architecture to the articulation of cultural identity. This paper aims to make a foundation for the study of churches and synagogues in Muslim societies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dhimmi Narrative a Comparison Between the Historical and the Actual in the Context of Christian-Muslim Relations in Egypt Today
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2009-12 The Dhimmi narrative a comparison between the historical and the actual in the context of Christian-Muslim relations in Egypt today Martin, Gianstefano C. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/4488 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE DHIMMI NARRATIVE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE HISTORICAL AND THE ACTUAL IN THE CONTEXT OF CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM RELATIONS IN MODERN EGYPT by Gianstefano C. Martin December 2009 Thesis Advisor: Mohammed Hafez Thesis Co-Advisor: Abbas Kadhim Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2009 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS The Dhimmi Narrative: A Comparison Between the Historical and the Actual in the Context of Christian-Muslim Relations in Modern Egypt 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Muslim Integration Into the Early Islamic Caliphate Through the Use of Surrender Agreements
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK History Undergraduate Honors Theses History 5-2020 Non-Muslim Integration Into the Early Islamic Caliphate Through the Use of Surrender Agreements Rachel Hutchings Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/histuht Part of the History of Religion Commons, Islamic World and Near East History Commons, and the Medieval History Commons Citation Hutchings, R. (2020). Non-Muslim Integration Into the Early Islamic Caliphate Through the Use of Surrender Agreements. History Undergraduate Honors Theses Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/histuht/6 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Non-Muslim Integration Into the Early Islamic Caliphate Through the Use of Surrender Agreements An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Honors Studies in History By Rachel Hutchings Spring 2020 History J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences The University of Arkansas 1 Acknowledgments: For my family and the University of Arkansas Honors College 2 Table of Content Introduction…………………………………….………………………………...3 Historiography……………………………………….…………………………...6 Surrender Agreements…………………………………….…………….………10 The Evolution of Surrender Agreements………………………………….…….29 Conclusion……………………………………………………….….….…...…..35 Bibliography…………………………………………………………...………..40 3 Introduction Beginning with Muhammad’s forceful consolidation of Arabia in 631 CE, the Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphates completed a series of conquests that would later become a hallmark of the early Islamic empire. Following the Prophet’s death, the Rashidun Caliphate (632-661) engulfed the Levant in the north, North Africa from Egypt to Tunisia in the west, and the Iranian plateau in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Apologetics and the Gradual Restriction of Dhimmi Social Religious Liberties from the Arab-Muslim Conquests to the Abbasid Era Michael J
    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations Graduate Capstone Projects 2017 Shifting landscapes: Christian apologetics and the gradual restriction of dhimmi social religious liberties from the Arab-Muslim conquests to the Abbasid era Michael J. Rozek Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Rozek, Michael J., "Shifting landscapes: Christian apologetics and the gradual restriction of dhimmi social religious liberties from the Arab-Muslim conquests to the Abbasid era" (2017). Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations. 863. http://commons.emich.edu/theses/863 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Graduate Capstone Projects at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shifting Landscapes: Christian Apologetics and the Gradual Restriction of Dhimmī Social-Religious Liberties from the Arab-Muslim Conquests to the Abbasid Era by Michael J. Rozek Thesis Submitted to the Department of History Eastern Michigan University in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER of History in History Thesis Committee: Philip C. Schmitz, Ph.D, Chair John L. Knight, Ph.D April 21, 2017 Ypsilanti, Michigan Abstract This historical research study explores the changes of conquered Christians’ social-religious liberties from the first interactions between Christians and Arab-Muslims during the conquests c. A.D. 630 through the the ‘Abbasid era c.
    [Show full text]
  • Whoever Harms a Dhimm¯I I Shall Be His Foe on the Day of Judgment
    religions Article Article “Whoever“Whoever HarmsHarms aa DhimmDhimmı¯ī II ShallShall BeBe HisHis FoeFoe onon thethe DayDay of of Judgment”: Judgment”: An An Investigation Investigation into into an an Authentic Prophetic Tradition andand ItsIts OriginsOrigins fromfrom thethe Covenants Covenants Ahmed El-Wakil Ahmed El-Wakil College of Islamic Studies, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, P.O. Box 34110 Doha, Qatar; [email protected] of Islamic Studies, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, P.O. Box 34110 Doha, Qatar; [email protected] Received: 6 June 2019; Accepted: 9 August 2019; Published: 5 September 2019 Received: 6 June 2019; Accepted: 9 August 2019; Published: 5 September 2019 Abstract: The ḥadīth, “whoever harms a dhimmī I shall be his foe on the Day of Judgment’, can be foundAbstract: as anThe endh. adclause¯ıth, “whoeverto covenants harms which a dhimmthe Prophet¯ı I shall Muḥ beammad his foe issued on the to Day Christian, of Judgment’, Jewish, and can Magianbe found communities. as an end clause As it tois covenantshighly unlikely which for the different Prophet non-Muslim Muh. ammad communities issued to Christian, to have Jewish,forged thisand Prophetic Magian communities. statement at As the it isend highly of their unlikely respective for di ffdocuments,erent non-Muslim this paper communities argues that to havethis utteranceforged this is Propheticauthentic statementand can be at confidently the end of their traced respective back to documents,the Prophet. this This paper paper argues examines that thisthe occurrenceutterance is of authentic this statement and can as bea ḥ confidentlyadīth in the tracedIslamic back literature to the and Prophet.
    [Show full text]
  • Space, Religious Difference and Aḥkām Ahl Al-Dhimma
    Conclusion Space, Religious Difference and Aḥkām ahl al-dhimma How does Ibn al-Qayyim conceive of the place of dhimmis in Muslim society and how does he use space to convey religious truth? What roles do the con- cepts of inclusion and exclusion play in his portrayal of religious difference and how do they relate to the construction of power between the religions? This chapter brings the findings of this study together to answer these ques- tions about Aḥkām ahl al-dhimma. It will begin by drawing together observations about the relevance of space as an analytical and ideational category in Aḥkām ahl al-dhimma, followed by an overview of Ibn al-Qayyim’s construction of Muslim and non-Muslim identity in the book. The focus will then move to his argument, made through- out his text, about the place of dhimmis in the Abode of Islam. Does the non- Muslim have a place at all and if so, how does Ibn al-Qayyim’s transmission of rulings define it? After reviewing this question, the chapter will address Ibn al- Qayyim’s treatment of concepts of identity, power and space in Aḥkām ahl al- dhimma and his use of them to demonstrate the truth of Islam. The sixth and last section will review the text as a whole. Building on conclusions reached in Parts 1 and 2 of this study, it will answer the questions of how best to define Aḥkām ahl al-dhimma, how to relate Ibn al-Qayyim’s argument to the literary and socio-historical context in which it was formulated, and the meaning of the text as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • What Catholics Should Know About Islam
    V VERITAS What Catholics Should Know About Islam Sandra Toenies Keating The Veritas Series is dedicated to Blessed Michael McGivney (1852-1890), priest of Jesus Christ and founder of the Knights of Columbus. The Knights of Columbus presents The Veritas Series “Proclaiming the Faith in the Third Millennium” What Catholics Should Know About Islam by Sandra Toenies Keating General Editor Father Juan-Diego Brunetta, O.P. Catholic Information Service Knights of Columbus Supreme Council Copyright © 2008-2021 by Knights of Columbus Supreme Council. All rights reserved. Cover: Designed by Gail E. Williams © Knights of Columbus Supreme Office 2008. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Write: Knights of Columbus Supreme Council Catholic Information Service PO Box 1971 New Haven, CT 06521 www.kofc.org/cis [email protected] 203-752-4267 800-735-4605 Fax Printed in the United States of America CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................5 THE ORIGINS OF ISLAM AND ITS ENVIRONMENT ..................................8 THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD ...................................................................9 CHRISTIANITY AND THE BASIC TEACHINGS OF ISLAM..........................14 MAJOR THEMES OF
    [Show full text]
  • The Coptic Christians of Egypt
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-1-2014 The optC ic Christians of Egypt: Dhimmitude and Discrimination Patrick Alexander Younan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Recommended Citation Younan, Patrick Alexander, "The optC ic Christians of Egypt: Dhimmitude and Discrimination" (2014). Law School Student Scholarship. 608. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/608 I. Who are the Copts? In August of 2013, after the ouster of democratically elected Egyptian president, Muhammed Morsi, supporters of the ousted president set fire to dozens of churches across Egypt in a series of mob attacks. 1 It was the latest vivid reminder of a continuous assault on non-Muslim minorities in the country. It was the latest chapter in a conflict that dates back to the first millennium that still plays out today. The Coptic Christians of Egypt are a minority group that identifies itself as one of the earliest sects of Christianity in the world.2 The Copts have lived and survived in Egypt through the centuries, under the rule of various conquerors, and from a place of political power to their current position of powerlessness. As a minority the Copts have had to adapt to survive. A casual tourist in Egypt would be hard-pressed to differentiate Copts from Muslims with respect to language, physical characteristics, or mannerisms. Indeed, for more than one thousand years, Copts, in many ways, have been socially, economically, and culturally integrated within an Egypt ruled under Islam. Despite such acculturation, fundamental religious divisions between Copts and Muslims remain that have dramatically shaped their respective laws governing marriage and family relations in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Theology and Reformed Tradition Vol.8
    International Journal of Theology and Reformed Tradition Vol.8 DHIMMI UNDER ISLAMIC STATE: POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES Muhammad Dahiru Shuni & Muhammad Sani Abdullahi Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto Abstract This article discusses the political and social responsibilities of a non-Muslim (Dhimmi) under Islamic state. It defines Islamic and Secular states and explains their features. It evaluates the position, rights and the responsibilities of Dhimmi under Islamic law. Their fundamental rights, which include protection from all external threat, internal tyranny and persecution, freedom of religion, general welfare, equality before the law, freedom of trade, right to participate in government work have all been delineated. Similarly, the article highlights the duties and responsibilities of Dhimmi- this consists of respect of the religion of Islam, payment of poll tax (Jizya), and land tax (Kharaj) among others. It then wraps up with conclusion. The analysis was made within the framework of northern Nigerian states, this with a view to proffering possible solutions to the multi-religious violence in the region. The objective of the paper is therefore, to serve as important mechanism and spiritual safeguard against executive lawlessness and disrespect for citizens‟ rights no matter what religion they profess. The paper uses analytical phenomenological methodology. Keywords: Dhimmi , Islamic State, Muslim State Introduction Religious crisis in Nigeria is fast becoming epidemic, unbearable and uncontrollable. It is also becoming a lifestyle, especially in the Muslim dominated Northern parts of Nigeria. So much life has been wasted in the past ten years and property worth billions of dollars has destroyed. Development is now at the lowest level due to religious unrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Islamic New Year !! Quran 22:65
    PRAYER TIMINGS Effective 08/22 MCA NOOR Fajr 5:40 5:50 Dhuhr 1:30 1:30 Asr 5:15 6:15 Maghrib Sunset Sunset Isha 9:20 9:20 Juma 1 1:30 1:30 Juma 2 2:00 2:00 Newsletter Juma 3 2:30 2:30 Published Weekly by the Muslim Community Association of San Francisco Bay Area www.mcabayarea.org Moharram 2, 1442 AH Friday, Aug 21, 2020 Zahir Mosque – Kedah, Malaysia AL-QURAN Do you not see that Allah has subjected to you whatever is on the earth and the ships which run through the sea For questions please email [email protected]. by His command? And He restrains the sky from falling upon the earth, unless by His permission. Indeed Allah, to the people, is Kind and Merciful. Happy Islamic New Year !! Quran 22:65 HADITH Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) as saying: You would find people like those of mine, the good amongst you in the Days of Ignorance would be good amongst you in the days of Islam, provided they have an understanding of it and you will find good amongst people the persons who would be averse to position of authority until it is thrust upon them, and you will find the worst amongst persons one who has double face. He comes with one face to them and with the other face to the others. Sahih Muslim, Book 44, Hadith 283 1442 Hijri (2020-2021) MCA Elections Announcement NOMINATION DEADLINE: due at [email protected] by 10pm, Tuesday, August 18th July 29, 2020 Assalamu-Alaikum Dear MCA Member, InshaAllah, the MCA Elections for 1442H will be held on Sep 11-13, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Freedom Under Islam
    FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway http://www.forum18.org/ The right to believe, to worship and witness The right to change one's belief or religion The right to join together and express one's belief This article was published by F18News on: 13 January 2004 COMMENTARY: Religious freedom under Islam By Henrik Ertner Rasmussen, General Secretary, Danish European Mission <http://www.daneu.dk> In this personal commentary for Forum 18 News Service <http://www.forum18.org>, Henrik Ertner Rasmussen, General Secretary of the Danish European Mission <http://www.daneu.dk>, draws on his experience of living and studying in the Muslim world to examine how Islam understands religious freedom. He believes Muslims' attitudes to religious freedom have been shaped by the concept of Dhimmitude, under which proselytism by non-Muslims was banned, and Jews and Christians have become second-class citizens with only limited rights. He notes that a "religious supermarket" with a free choice of different products and brands has not been introduced in the Muslim world, but sees signs of hope that intellectuals and religious officials in the Muslim world are discussing new ideas openly and are suggesting reforms which could lead to greater religious liberty. At a conference on Christian-Muslim dialogue, the question of religious freedom came up. "In our country, the Christians have more religious freedom than the Muslims," one Muslim leader declared, "because they have the right to convert, while Muslims haven't." At another conference, where the topic was aired, the Muslims in one working group agreed with the Christians that of course, there should be religious freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam: a Primer
    Order Code RS21432 February 19, 2003 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Islam: A Primer Clyde Mark Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary There are about one billion Muslims in the world, concentrated primarily in North Africa, the Middle East, and South and Southeast Asia. Islam teaches that Allah selected Muhammad, a merchant from Mecca, as the last of the prophets following Adam, Moses, Jesus, and others, to deliver God’s message to mankind. The report includes short descriptions of the historical background, the tenets of Islam, jihad, the status of women in Islam, and other aspects of Islam. The report will not be updated. Historical Background According to Islamic belief, in 610 A.D., Muhammad, a 40-year-old merchant of the Quraysh tribe in Mecca, in the Arabian desert (now eastern Saudi Arabia), was commanded by the angel Gabriel to “recite” the message of Allah (Arabic for God). Gabriel said mankind had lost sight of Allah’s previous messages to earlier prophets, Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Solomon, and Jesus, among others, and that Muhammad was to spread Allah’s message to all people so that mankind would know how to live, how to show respect for Allah, and how to prepare for the judgement day. The message to Muhammad was to be God’s last; Muhammad was the “seal of the prophets.” Muhammad won some converts to Islam, but his monotheist preaching threatened to undermine the profitable polytheist pilgrim traffic supporting many Meccan merchants. In 622 A.D., the merchants drove Muhammad and his followers out of Mecca to the city of Yathrib (later renamed Medina, or city - as in the city of the prophet).
    [Show full text]