DOCSLIB.ORG

Mountain Protected Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mountain Protected Areas UPDATE March 2021 # 109 In this issue: A note from the editor: From People and Mountains Welcome to a special 109th edition of the Update where around the world: the mountain ‘priority areas for protection and Global conservation ’ project being undertaken by the Mountain Identification of Global Specialist Group, in association with the USGS is featured. Priorities for New Although still being refined and trialed this exciting Mountain Protected & initiative will help guide priorities for future mountain Conserved Areas protection! Have a look at the decision tool and see what Scree and Talus you think... Tools, Publications other Media ‘scree & talus’ is still included along with ‘tools & publications’ — so happy reading. March 5 2021 Mountain SG Committee Every year hundreds of thousands of people go on expeditions and trekking in remote mountains. This generates increasing amounts of waste that is not managed sustainably...here is alpinist Jost Kobusch surrounded by various mountaineering waste he collected on Mount Everest! Find out more about a new manual in Tools, Publications & other Media page 11 photo: Daniel Hug Mountain Update is a quarterly newsletter distributed to members of the Mountain Protected Areas Network. The views expressed in this UPDATE are not necessarily those of the IUCN WCPA. IUCN WCPA Mountain UPDATE # 109 Editor: Gillian Anderson [email protected] Identification of Global Priorities for New Mountain Protected and Conserved Areas: IUCN WCPA Mountain Specialist Group Why undertake a Project to identify unprotected mountains? The world’s system of protected and conserved areas includes many outstanding areas within the Earth’s mountainous landscape. Excluding Antarctica, about 19% of mountain areas globally are protected or conserved. Nevertheless, significant mountain areas are not adequately protected, and many mountain ranges are completely unprotected. Of over 6000 Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) in mountains worldwide, 40.4% are entirely unprotected. As the world conservation movement advocates to expand the global coverage of protected areas over the next decade toward 30%, identifying priorities for new mountain protected and conserved areas will be most effective if it takes a Simien Mountains Ethiopia. photo: strategic approach to ensure areas of highest ecological value and most in need of Marc Foggin protection are identified. A number of people from the Mountain Specialist Group have come together to develop a paper that describes in detail the project and a six step decision support tool. Key authors of the project paper The authors are: Peter Jacobs*, Erik Beever, Clinton Carbutt, Marc Foggin, Diego Juffe-Bignoli, Madeline Martin#, Shane Orchard and Roger Sayre#. * Peter Jacobs is the corresponding author # United States Geological Survey Project Aim Identify inadequately protected mountain areas and prioritise their importance for protection and conservation. Provide a basis for the Mountain Specialist Group and others to advocate for new mountain protected and conserved areas. Tibet. photo: peopleinnature Six Step Decision Support Tool The Mountain Specialist Group paper introduces a six step decision support tool (with tables and links to relevant data) for identifying and prioritising candidate areas for conserving mountain ecosystems, species and habitats. The tool begins with an analysis of the adequacy of the level of protection of mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). It then quantitatively assesses if the inadequately protected mountain KBA is also characterised by: inadequately protected mountain ecosystems, biodiversity hotspots, red-listed species and/or communities, Conservation of nature by indigenous other forms of effective conservation i.e. ICCAs & OECMs, and nomadic tribes of Iran photo: ICCA being within a Developing Country Consortium & CENESTA It then guides regional teams through qualitative assessments of other values to develop regionally ranked lists of priority areas to give heightened consideration for protection or conservation. IUCN WCPA Mountain Update # 109 Editor: Gillian Anderson [email protected] 2 Identification of Global Priorities for New Mountain Protected and Conserved Areas: IUCN WCPA Mountain Specialist Group Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) Protection There are many reasons why it is vital to protect and conserve new mountain areas but identifying unprotected Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) is a good starting point in a strategic and stepped process. The graph below shows breakdown of protection of mountain KBAs. There are over 6,109 identified mountain KBAs Sierra Nevada Mountains USA photo: peopleinnature In addition to KBAs; levels of protection of mountain ecosystems, biodiversity hotspots, IUCN red listed ecosystems and species and a range of other values including OECM’s have been taken into account when identifying priorities. Biodiversity Hotspots Around the world, 36 areas qualify as biodiversity hotspots (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund 2019). They represent areas of very high biodiversity value under threat. Covering just 2.4% of Earth’s land surface they contain more than 50% of the world’s plant species as endemics and nearly 43% of bird, mammal, reptile and amphibian species as endemics. About half of the world’s biodiversity hotspots are in mountainous regions. Kyrgyzstan Mountains photo: Marc Foggin Red Listed Ecosystems and Species The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems and IUCN Red List of Threatened Species provide standards for assessing the conservation status of ecosystems and species, locally, regionally and globally. Snow Leopard is native to the mountains of Central and South Asia. Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List They are powerful tools to inform action for biodiversity conservation because the global population is estimated to and can influence policy changes that are critical to protecting the number less than 10,000 mature individuals. photo: natural resources and processes that humans rely on (IUCN 2019). WWF IUCN WCPA Mountain Update # 109 Editor: Gillian Anderson [email protected] 3 Identification of Global Priorities for New Mountain Protected and Conserved Areas: IUCN WCPA Mountain Specialist Group Protection of Mountain Biomes and Ecosystems Mountain Biomes The protection of mountains at the biome level gives an indication of relative occurrence and protection of mountain values at a broad scale prior to examining the protection at the ecosystem level. For example Mountain Grasslands make up 15% of the terrestrial landscape but are only 9.6% protected and Mountain Forests even though they have 50% coverage are only 18.7% protected. Mountain Biomes: Proportion of each biome in the mountain landscape, globally (central column), and each biome’s Level of Protection (right-most edge), (not including croplands or settlements): (based on Sayre et al. 2020). (Note that the diagram is a guide and not accurate to scale) Mountain Ecosystems There are 278 natural or semi-natural World terrestrial Ecosystems. Of those, there are 77 mountain ecosystems that cover 32% in area of the world’s natural or semi-natural ecosystems (Sayre et al. 2020). The mountain ecosystems most comprehensively protected by proportion are: Cool Temperate Moist Snow and Ice on Mountains (60%) Polar Moist Snow and Ice on Mountains (43%) Boreal Moist Snow and Ice on Mountains (40%) The mountain ecosystems least protected by proportion are: Boreal Desert Sparsely or Non-vegetated on Mountains (0%) Boreal Desert Grassland on Mountains (0%) and Cool Temperate Desert Grassland on Mountains (0.006%). Moisture/Vegetation classes Grouping the mountain ecosystems into 15 Moisture/Vegetation classes provides a mid level perspective of the protection of biodiversity characteristics between biomes and ecosystems. Percent of each Moisture/Vegetation class that occurs within protected areas IUCN WCPA Mountain Update # 109 Editor: Gillian Anderson [email protected] 4 Identification of Global Priorities for New Mountain Protected and Conserved Areas: IUCN WCPA Mountain Specialist Group Mapping the adequacy of protection of KBAs and Mountain Ecosystems: an example from Jammu Kashmir in India Protection Status of KBAs and Mountain Ecosystems in Jammu Kashmir, India. (USGS) Determining Adequacy of Protection: Protected and Conserved Areas The validation of the protection or conservation status is an important step in the process. Along with legally established protected areas, conserved ICCAs—Territory for Life and OECMs (Other Effective areas may be considered as incorporating all defined areas Conservation Measures) that effectively achieve conservation in situ. Many indigenous peoples and local communities This includes Other Effective Area-based Conservation around the world are custodians, stewards, and/or Measures (OECMs), Indigenous Peoples’ and Community guardians of the land, water, sky, soil, minerals, and Conserved Areas and Territories (ICCAs-Territories of Life) and unmanaged and ungoverned areas (ICCA 2019) other natural resources and biodiversity that is traditionally occupied or used by them. Many ICCAs – Territories of Life are conserved areas and may be considered OECMs: they conserve nature de facto, as part of biocultural systems, yet without being listed in an official protected area system. Rwanda photo: Elaine Thomas and Mick Keenan IUCN WCPA Mountain Update # 109 Editor: Gillian Anderson [email protected] 5 Identification of Global Priorities for New
Recommended publications
  • The Irish Mountain Ringlet [Online]

    The Irish Mountain Ringlet [Online]

    24 November 2014 (original version February 2014) © Peter Eeles Citation: Eeles, P. (2014). The Irish Mountain Ringlet [Online]. Available from http://www.dispar.org/reference.php?id=1 [Accessed November 24, 2014]. The Irish Mountain Ringlet Peter Eeles Abstract: The presence of the Mountain Ringlet (Erebia epiphron) in Ireland has been a topic of much interest to Lepidopterists for decades, partly because of the small number of specimens that are reputedly Irish. This article examines available literature to date and includes images of all four surviving specimens that can lay claim to Irish provenance. [This is an update to the article written in February 2014]. The presence of the Mountain Ringlet (Erebia epiphron) in Ireland has been a topic of much interest to Lepidopterists for decades, partly because of the small number of specimens that are reputedly Irish. The Irish Mountain Ringlet is truly the stuff of legend and many articles have been written over the years, including the excellent summary by Chalmers-Hunt (1982). The purpose of this article is to examine all relevant literature and, in particular, the various points of view that have been expressed over the years. This article also includes images of all four surviving specimens that can lay claim to Irish provenance and some of the sites mentioned in conjunction with these specimens are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 - Key Sites The Birchall Mountain Ringlet (1854) The first reported occurrence of Mountain Ringlet in Ireland was provided by Edwin Birchall (Birchall, 1865) where,
  • Erebia Epiphron and Erebia Orientalis

    Erebia Epiphron and Erebia Orientalis

    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2018, XX, 1–11. With 4 figures. Erebia epiphron and Erebia orientalis: sibling butterfly Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/biolinnean/bly182/5233450 by guest on 11 December 2018 species with contrasting histories JOAN CARLES HINOJOSA1,4, YERAY MONASTERIO2, RUTH ESCOBÉS2, VLAD DINCĂ3 and ROGER VILA1,* 1Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37–49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 2Asociación Española para la Protección de las Mariposas y su Medio (ZERYNTHIA), Madre de Dios 14, 26004 Logroño, Spain 3Department of Ecology and Genetics, PO Box 3000, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland 4Departament de Ciències de la Salut i de la Vida (DCEXS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Doctor Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain Received 5 September 2018; revised 21 October 2018; accepted for publication 21 October 2018 The butterfly genus Erebia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) is the most diverse in Europe and comprises boreo-alpine habitat specialists. Populations are typically fragmented, restricted to high altitudes in one or several mountain ranges, where habitat is relatively well preserved, but where the effects of climate change are considerable. As a result, the genus Erebia has become a model to study the impact of climate changes, past and present, on intraspecific genetic diversity. In this study, we inferred phylogenetic relationships among populations of the European species Erebia epiphron and Erebia orientalis using mitochondrial (COI) and nuclear markers (ITS2, wg and RPS5), and reconstructed their phylogeographical history. We confirm E. orientalis and E. epiphron as a relatively young species pair that split c.
  • Treasures of the Krkonoše Tundra

    Treasures of the Krkonoše Tundra

    Treasures of The KrKonoše Tundra Podpořeno grantem z Islandu, Lichtenštejnska a Norska. Supported by grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. Terminological Dictionary a plant or animal species which originated and only occurs in endemic a specific, geographically defined area; outside of this area it does species not naturally occur a plant or animal species which has survived in a locality since the glacial relict ice ages Hercynides, a geologically ancient, non-limestone, mountain range in central Hercynian and western Europe (Massif Central, Vosges, Schwarzwald, Harz, mountain Šumava, Bayerischer Wald, Krušné hory Mountains and the High range Sudetes) large animals which lived on Earth at the end of the last ice age (e.g. cave bear, cave lion, woolly rhinoceros, woolly mammoth, megafauna spotted hyena); most of these animals died out during the warming in the Holocene dwarf pine scrub with rare plant community on the subarctic ridge peatbogs in Krkonoše cloudberry the individual layers of snow on the slope are moving at different speeds, which causes pressure and on the bodies of plants, creeping snow especially on the branches and trunks of woody plants, which become deformed; various unusually shaped forms of woody plants occur in this way e.g. on avalanche runs (crooked forests) green plant capable of photosynthesis, but extracting water and semi-parasite mineral nutrients from its host plant Life Corcontica supports improved management of the most valuable montane project meadows in Krkonoše and selected plant and animal
  • The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve

    The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve

    Scotland’s National Nature Reserves For more information about Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve please contact: Scottish Natural Heritage, Creag Meagaidh NNR, Aberarder, Kinlochlaggan, Newtonmore, Inverness-shire, PH20 1BX Telephone/Fax: 01528 544 265 Email: [email protected] The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve The Story of Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve Foreword Creag Meagaidh National Nature Reserve (NNR), named after the great whalebacked ridge which dominates the Reserve, is one of the most diverse and important upland sites in Scotland. Creag Meagaidh is a complex massif, with numerous mountain tops and an extensive high summit plateau edged by a dramatic series of ice-carved corries and gullies. The Reserve extends from the highest of the mountain tops to the shores of Loch Laggan. The plateau is carpeted in moss-heath and is an important breeding ground for dotterel. The corries support unusual artic- alpine plants and the lower slopes have scattered patches of ancient woodland dominated by birch. Located 45 kilometres (km) northeast of Fort William and covering nearly 4,000 hectares (ha), the Reserve is owned and managed by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH). Creag Meagaidh has been a NNR since 1986 and during the last twenty years SNH has worked to restore natural habitats, particularly woodland, on the Reserve. Like much of the Highlands, the vegetation has been heavily grazed for centuries, so it was decided to reduce the number of grazing animals by removing sheep and culling red deer. The aim was not to eliminate grazing animals altogether, but to keep numbers at a level that allowed the habitats, especially the woodland, to recover.
  • With Description of Immature Stages (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) 187-196 ©Ges

    With Description of Immature Stages (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) 187-196 ©Ges

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2001 Band/Volume: 32 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuras Tomás, Benes Jiri, Konvicka Martin, Honc Lubomír Artikel/Article: Life histories of Erebia sudetica sudetica and E. epiphron silesiana with description of immature stages (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) 187-196 ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (June 2001) 32(1/2): 187-196, Colour plate XII, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 Life histories of Erebia sudetica sudetica and E. epiphron silesiana with description of immature stages (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) by To m á s Ku ras , J ir í Benes , M a r t in Ko n v ic k a & L u b o m ír H o n c received 19.111.2001 Summary: The life cycies, morphology and behaviour of the immature stages of the ringlets Erebia sudetica sudetica and E. epiphron silesiana inhabiting the Hruby Jesenik Mts. (= Alt- vatergebirge; Czech Republic) are presented. Immature stages of E. sudetica are described here for the first time. Both species have been reared to maturity from eggs laid by females caught in the wild. Out of accord with hitherto attainments, both species preferred Festuca supina as the main host plant (in choice experiments, E. epiphron preferred Avenella flexuosa). In rearing experiments, the species overwintered only once and finished their development within a one-year period. Highest mortality of individuals appeared during overwintering of L2- [E. sudetica) and L3-larvae (E epiphron). Introduction Five species of the species-rich holarctic genus Erebia Dalman, 1816, which is renown for high diversity in alpine and arctic habitats, frequent endemism and subspecific differentiation (Warren, 1936), occur in the HrubyJesenik Mts.
  • The Effects of Winter Recreation on Alpine and Subalpine Fauna: a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

    The Effects of Winter Recreation on Alpine and Subalpine Fauna: a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

    The Effects of Winter Recreation on Alpine and Subalpine Fauna: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis Chloe F. Sato1*, Jeff T. Wood1, David B. Lindenmayer1,2 1 Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Abstract The ski industry is often perceived as having a negative impact on sensitive alpine and subalpine communities. However, empirical evidence of such impacts is lacking. We reviewed the available literature from the last 35 years to quantify the reported effects of winter recreation on faunal communities. Overall, using one-sample binomial tests (‘sign tests’) we found that the effects of all types of winter recreation-related disturbances (i.e. ski runs, resort infrastructure and winter tourism) were more likely to be negative or have no effect, than be positive for wildlife. More specifically, in Europe, where the majority of the available research was conducted, the impacts of winter recreation were most often negative for fauna. In terms of specific taxa, birds and to a lesser extent mammals and arthropods, responded negatively to disturbance. Results from our meta-analysis confirmed the results from our binomial tests. Richness, abundance and diversity of fauna were lower in areas affected by winter recreation when compared with undisturbed areas. For most regions and taxa, however, empirical evidence remains too limited to identify clear impacts of winter recreation. We therefore conclude that the majority of ski resorts are operating in the absence of knowledge needed to inform effective strategies for biodiversity conservation and ecologically-sound management.
  • Multiple Glacial Refugia and Contemporary Dispersal Shape the Genetic Structure of an Endemic Amphibian from the Pyrenees

    Multiple Glacial Refugia and Contemporary Dispersal Shape the Genetic Structure of an Endemic Amphibian from the Pyrenees

    MS. FEDERICA LUCATI (Orcid ID : 0000-0001-9925-7137) DR. MATHIEU DENOEL (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-3586-8323) Article type : Original Article Multiple glacial refugia and contemporary dispersal shape the genetic structure of an endemic amphibian from the Pyrenees Running title: Linking phylogeography and recent dispersal Federica Lucati*1,2 ꝉ, Manon Poignet*3, Alexandre Miró2, Audrey Trochet3,4, Fabien Aubret3, Laurent Barthe5, Romain Bertrand3, Teresa Buchaca2, Olivier Calvez3, Jenny Caner2, Elodie Darnet3, Mathieu Denoël6, Olivier Guillaume3, Hugo Le Chevalier3, Albert Martínez-Silvestre7, Marc Mossoll-Torres8,9, David O’Brien10, Víctor Osorio2, Gilles Pottier5, Murielle Richard3, Ibor Sabás2, Jérémie Souchet3, Jan Tomàs2 and Marc Ventura2 *Both authors contributed equally to this work 1 Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal 2 Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Blanes, Spain 3 CNRS, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale (SETE), Université Paul Sabatier, Moulis, France 4 Société Herpétologique de France, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France 5 Association Nature En Occitanie, Maison de l’Environnement de Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been throughAccepted Article the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/MEC.15521 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved 6 Laboratory of Ecology and Conservation of Amphibians (LECA), Freshwater and OCeanic science Unit of reSearch (FOCUS), University of Liege, Liege, Belgium 7 Catalonia Reptile and Amphibian Rescue Center (CRARC), Masquefa, Spain 8 Pirenalia, Encamp, Andorra 9 Bomosa, Les Escaldes, Andorra 10 Scottish Natural Heritage, Scotland, UK ꝉ Corresponding author.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    BULGARIA Nick Greatorex-Davies. European Butterflies Group Contact ([email protected]) Local Contact Prof. Stoyan Beshkov. ([email protected]) National Museum of Natural History (NMNH), Sofia, Butterfly Conservation Europe Partner Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Stanislav Abadjiev compiled and collated butterfly records for the whole of Bulgaria and published a Local Recording Scheme distribution atlas in 2001 (see below). Records are still being gathered and can be sent to Stoyan Beshkov at NMNH, Sofia. Butterfly List See Butterflies of Bulgaria website (Details below) Introduction Bulgaria is situated in eastern Europe with its eastern border running along the Black Sea coast. It is separated from Romania for much of its northern border by the River Danube. It shares its western border with Serbia and Macedonia, and its southern border with Greece and Turkey. Bulgaria has a land area of almost 111,000 sq km (smaller than England but bigger than Scotland) and a declining human population of 7.15 million (as of 2015), 1.5 million of which live in the capital city, Sofia. It is very varied in both climate, topography and habitats. Substantial parts of the country are mountainous, particularly in the west, south-west and central ‘spine’ of the country and has the highest mountain in the Balkan Mountains (Musala peak in the Rila Mountains, 2925m) (Map 1). Almost 70% of the land area is above 200m and over 27% above 600m. About 40% of the country is forested and this is likely to increase through natural regeneration due to the abandonment of agricultural land. Following nearly 500 years under the rule of the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria was independent for just a few years from 1908 before coming under the domination of the soviet communist regime in 1946.
  • Insectos Y Arácnidos

    Insectos Y Arácnidos

    Insectos y arácnidos English Español Français abdomen abdomen abdomen abiotic factor agente abiótico facteur abiotique acarine disease acariasis acariose acarine mite ácaro traqueal acarien acarinosis of vine acarosis de la vid acariose de la vigne acephalous acéfalo acéphale acid gland glándula ácida glande adaptation adaptación adaptation Aden skipper ajedrezada de Walker hespérie saoudienne adjustable entrance piquera regulable réducteur d'entrée adonis blue niña celeste azuré bleu céleste adult adulto adulte adzuki bean weevil gorgojo del frijol adzuki bruche chinoise aedeagus edeago édéage aetherie fritillary doncella gaditana mélitée andalouse African armyworm gusano africano chenille légionnaire africaine African assassin bug chinche asesina africana réduve à deux tâches African babul blue babul azul africana azuré du mimosa African cotton leafworm rosquilla negra ver du cotonnier African emperor scorpion escorpión emperador africano scorpion empereur African field cricket grillo negro grillon à deux tâches African grass blue niña esmaltada menor azuré de la surelle African ringlet erebia africana astéropode Agenjo’s anomalous blue velludita parda de Agenjo sablé d’Agenjo air sac saco traqueal sac à air alate alado ailé albino bee abeja albina abeille albinos alchymist alquimista alchimiste alcon blue hormiguera azuré des mouillères alder fly mosca del aliso sialis de la vase alder kitten harpía de los alisos queue-fourchue de l’aulne alder moth polilla gris de los alisos noctuelle de l’aulne alder tubemaker barrenador del aliso
  • 40Th FREE with Orders Over

    40Th FREE with Orders Over

    By Appointment To H.R.H. The Duke Of Edinburgh Booksellers London Est. 1978 www.bibliophilebooks.com ISSN 1478-064X CATALOGUE NO. 366 OCT 2018 PAGE PAGE 18 The Night 18 * Before FREE with orders over £40 Christmas A 3-D Pop- BIBLIOPHILE Up Advent th Calendar 40 with ANNIVERSARY stickers PEN 1978-2018 Christmas 84496, £3.50 (*excluding P&P, Books pages 19-20 84760 £23.84 now £7 84872 £4.50 Page 17 84834 £14.99 now £6.50UK only) 84459 £7.99 now £5 84903 Set of 3 only £4 84138 £9.99 now £6.50 HISTORY Books Make Lovely Gifts… For Family & Friends (or Yourself!) Bibliophile has once again this year Let us help you find a book on any topic 84674 RUSSIA OF THE devised helpful categories to make useful you may want by phone and we’ll TSARS by Peter Waldron Including a wallet of facsimile suggestions for bargain-priced gift buying research our database of 3400 titles! documents, this chunky book in the Thames and Hudson series of this year. The gift sections are Stocking FREE RUBY ANNIVERSARY PEN WHEN YOU History Files is a beautifully illustrated miracle of concise Fillers under a fiver, Children’s gift ideas SPEND OVER £40 (automatically added to narration, starting with the (in Children’s), £5-£20 gift ideas, Luxury orders even online when you reach this). development of the first Russian state, Rus, in the 9th century. tomes £20-£250 and our Yuletide books Happy Reading, Unlike other European countries, Russia did not have to selection.
  • NEWSLETTER Issue 2 October 2007

    NEWSLETTER Issue 2 October 2007

    NEWSLETTER Issue 2 October 2007 Contents Page PART 1 Introduction 2 Contact Details / Dates for your Diary 3 Nets – Simon Spencer 4 & 5 EIG Trips in 2008 6 Hungary 6 Mount Chelmos (Greece) 6,7,&8 2007 EIG Trips 9 Ecrins National Park France July 2007 9 & 10 EIG Project in Turkey 10 & 11 A New Species of Melitaea in Europe 12 & 13 Requests for Information 14 A chance to help – Drome – Joyce & Peter Gay 14 Majorca – Andy Britton 14 Little Fritillary – Richard Smith 15 Arctic circle for Butterflies – Richard Smith 15 Getting the Garvarnie Blues – David Newland 16 & 17 Butterflies of the Croatian Islands 18 & 19 PART 2 - To be sent as a separate Pdf file Member’s Trip Reports of 2007: Bulgaria – Peter Bygate The Year in Provence – Butterflies of Var – Roger Gibbons Spring in Morocco – Neil Thompson PART 3 – To be sent as a separate Pdf file Pyrgus warrenensis (Warren’s Skipper) near the Bernina Pass – Bernard Watts The EIG Website www.bc-eig.org.uk Send us anything that you think should go on the website – it’s your website. Please email any thoughts, ideas, or whatever you have, to [email protected] . Thank you. Butterfly Conservation a registered and non-profit making company, limited by guarantee. Registered in England No: 2206468 – Registered Charity No: 254937 Registered office: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset. BH20 5QP. Tel: 0870 7744309 1 INTRODUCTION EIG has got off to a reasonable start and now has 110 members, which is way beyond the critical mass needed to make the organisation effective.
  • Serbia for the Period 2011 – 2018

    Serbia for the Period 2011 – 2018

    MINISTRY OF ENVIRONmeNT AND SPATIAL PLANNING BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY OF THE RePUBLIC OF SeRBIA FOR THE PERIOD 2011 – 2018 Belgrade, 2011. IMPRINT Title of the publication: Biodiversity Strategy of the Republic of Serbia for the period 2011 – 2018 Publisher: Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, Belgrade For Publisher: Oliver Dulic, MD Editors: Prof. Ivica Radovic, PhD Milena Kozomara, MA Photography: Boris Erg, Sergej Ivanov and Predrag Mirkovic Design: Coba&associates Printed on Recycled paper in “PUBLIKUM”, Belgrade February 2011 200 copies ISBN 978-86-87159-04-4 FOR EWORD “Because of the items that satisfy his fleeting greed, he destroys large plants that protect the soil everywhere, quickly leading to the infertility of the soil he inhabits and causing springs to dry up, removing animals that relied on this nature for their food and resulting in large areas of the once very fertile earth that were largely inhabited in every respect, being now barren, infertile, uninhabitable, deserted. One could say that he is destined, after making the earth uninhabitable, to destroy himself” Jean Baptiste Lamarck (Zoological Philosophy, 1809). Two centuries after Lamarck recorded these thoughts, it is as if we were only a step away from fulfilling his alarming prophecy. Today, unfortunately, it is possible to state that man’s influence over the environment has never been as intensive, extensive or far-reaching. The explosive, exponential growth of the world’s population, coupled with a rapid depletion of natural resources and incessant accumulation of various pollutants, provides a dramatic warning of the severity of the situation at the beginning of the third millennium.